Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:43:11.629Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Reassessing the neo-liberal development model in Central and Eastern Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2014

Vivien A. Schmidt
Affiliation:
Boston University
Mark Thatcher
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Get access

Summary

From the point of view of many participants and observers, the breakthrough of 1989 was nothing else but the historical victory of liberalism over socialism.

(Szacki 1995 [1994]: 3–4)

The standard stabilization principles apply here: fiscal deficits must be eliminated, money creation controlled.

(Blanchard et al. 1993: xii)

Developments outside Slovakia have been exceptionally turbulent since 2008, which makes the need to provide certainty for our citizens ever more pressing. The Government…will guarantee sound and sustainable economic growth…which is not based predominantly on cheap labour, uncertainty in industrial relations, impaired health and safety at work, agency work, speculation and fraud.

(Government of the Slovak Republic 2012)

Introduction

Central and Eastern European countries were global leaders in the adoption of neo-liberal ideas and policies during the 1990s and 2000s. After being ruled for decades by communist political regimes that rejected free-market economics, Central and Eastern European countries were among the least liberal societies in the world in 1989. The following two decades witnessed a dramatic catch-up with and popularization of Western liberal norms. Estonia, for instance, which was part of the Soviet Union for almost fifty years, transformed into one of the most liberal economies in the world and a Eurozone member in the twenty years between 1991 and 2011. Its economic liberalism now exceeds that of most Western European countries. Other countries moved at their own pace, in their own way, and with greater or lesser trouble, but nearly all Central and Eastern European countries adopted neo-liberal ideas and policies at a dramatic rate for the better part of two decades.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, Bruce. 1992. The Future of Liberal Revolution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Appel, Hilary. 2000. ‘The Ideological Determinants of Liberal Economic Reform: The Case of Privatization’, World Politics 52 (4): 520–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appel, Hilary, and Orenstein, Mitchell A.. 2013. ‘Ideas versus Resources: Explaining the Flat Tax and Pension Privatization Revolutions in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union’, Comparative Political Studies 46 (2): 132–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balcerowicz, Leszek. 1994. ‘Understanding Postcommunist Transitions’, Journal of Democracy 5 (4): 75–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanchard, Olivier. 1999. The Economics of Post-Communist Transition. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Blanchard, Olivier, Rudiger Dornbusch, , Krugman, Paul, Layard, Richard, and Summers, Lawrence. 1993. Reform in Eastern Europe. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bockman, Johanna. 2011. Markets in the Name of Socialism: The Left-Wing Origins of Neoliberalism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bockman, Johanna, and Eyal, Gil. 2002. ‘Eastern Europe as a Laboratory for Economic Knowledge: The Transnational Roots of Neoliberalism’, American Journal of Sociology 108 (2): 310–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohle, Dorothee. 2006. ‘Neoliberal Hegemony, Transnational Capital and the Terms of the EU's Eastward Expansion’, Capital & Class 30 (1): 57–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremmer, Ian. 2010. The End of the Free Market: Who Wins the War between States and Corporations?New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Cook, Linda, and Orenstein, Mitchell A.. 1999. ‘Introduction’. In Left Parties and Social Policy in Central and Eastern Europe, edited by Cook, Linda, Orenstein, Mitchell A., and Rueschemeyer, Marilyn. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), 2007. ‘Transition Report 2007: People in Transition’. Reports data from the World Bank–EBRD ‘Life in Transition’ survey of 29,000 households in twenty-eight transition countries conducted in September 2006. (London.)
Free Hungary. 2012. ‘Hungary PM Orbán's Scandalous Statements at a Forum of Hungarian Business Leaders’ (29 July). Available at .
Government of Romania. 2009. ‘Programme for Government 2009–2012: Internal and International Economic and Financial Context’. Available at .
Government of the Slovak Republic. 2012 (May). ‘Manifesto of the Government of the Slovak Republic’. Available at .
Gowan, Peter. 1995. ‘Neo-Liberal Theory and Practice for Eastern Europe’, New Left Review 1 (213) (September/October): 3–60.Google Scholar
Grzymala-Busse, Anna. 2007. Rebuilding Leviathan. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellman, Joel S. 1998. ‘Winners Take All: The Politics of Partial Reform in Postcommunist Transitions’, World Politics 50: 203–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, Wade. 2006. ‘Inspiration, Coalition, and Substitution: External Influences on Postcommunist Transformations’, World Politics 58: 623–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kattel, Rainer. 2010. ‘Financial and Economic Crisis in Eastern Europe’, Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics 33 (1): 41–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klaus, Vaclav. 2005. On the Road to Democracy: The Czech Republic from Communism to Free Society. Washington, DC: National Center for Policy Analysis.Google Scholar
Kornai, Janos. 1990. The Road to a Free Economy. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Manzetti, Luigi. 2009. Neoliberalism, Accountability, and Reform Failures in Emerging Markets: Eastern Europe, Russia, Argentina, and Chile in Comparative Perspective. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Nölke, Andreas, and Vliegenthart, Arjan. 2009. ‘Enlarging the Varieties of Capitalism: The Emergence of Dependent Market Economies in East Central Europe’, World Politics 61: 670–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orenstein, Mitchell A. 2009. ‘What Happened in East European (Political) Economies? A Balance Sheet for Neoliberal Reform’, East European Politics and Societies 23 (4): 479–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ost, David. 2005. The Defeat of Solidarity: Anger and Politics in Postcommunist Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Philipov, Dimitŭr, and Dorbritz, Jürgen. 2003. ‘Demographic Consequences of Economic Transition in Countries of Central and Eastern Europe’, Population Studies, Issue 39. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Ringold, Dena, Orenstein, Mitchell A., and Wilkens, Erika. 2005. Roma in an Expanding Europe: Breaking the Poverty Cycle. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Sachs, Jeffrey. 1994. Poland's Jump to the Market Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Stuckler, David, King, Lawrence, and McKee, Martin. 2009. ‘Mass Privatisation and the Post-Communist Mortality Crisis: A Cross-National Analysis’, The Lancet 373: 399–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Szacki, Jerzy. 1995 [1994]. Liberalism after Communism. Budapest: Central European University Press. First published as Liberalizm po komunizmie. 1994. Warsaw: Znak and Fundacja Im. Stefana Batorego.Google Scholar
Tavits, Margit, and Letki, Natalia. 2009. ‘When Left Is Right: Party Ideology and Policy in Post-Communist Europe’, American Political Science Review 103: 555–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagstyl, Stefan. 2009. ‘Variable Vulnerability’, Financial Times (25 February).Google Scholar
Wedel, Janine. 1998. Collision and Collusion: The Strange Case of Western Aid to Eastern Europe. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Weiner, Mark S. 2013. The Rule of the Clan: What an Ancient Form of Social Organization Reveals about the Future of Individual Freedom. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar
Williamson, John. 1990. ‘What Washington Means by Policy Reform’. In Latin American Adjustment: How Much Has Happened?, edited by Williamson, John (7–38). Washington: Institute of International Economics, Washington.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×