Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T17:30:04.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Literature, power, and the recovery of philosophical ethics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

Jane Adamson
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Richard Freadman
Affiliation:
La Trobe University, Victoria
David Parker
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Canberra
Get access

Summary

One of the striking features of contemporary literary theory, and indeed cultural studies more generally, is what might be termed its socio-politicisation of the ethical. Literary texts, traditionally viewed as repositories of moral and aesthetic insight or challenge, tend now to be seen as predominantly ideological constructions, or sites of power struggles between social forces of various kinds. Individuals and individual actions are treated as wholly explicable in terms of impersonal social forces locked in political confict. We are urged to see ourselves as ‘docile bodies’, and to view ‘creative’ literary output as simply evidential of impersonal social power struggles.

In what follows we will not directly concern ourselves with literature but with certain understandings of the social and political domains. Our aim is first of all to clarify the nature of social and political action and thereby to free it from some of the confusions to which its interpretation can be prone (this will be the primary task of Miller's section of the chapter) and second, to illustrate, in Coady's section, the complexities of ethical thinking about social and political realites by examining two relatively unexplored ‘moral situations’, those of compromise and extrication, each of which shows some of the ways in which moral reasoning and practical necessity can and should complement each other.

Socio-political action: a theoretical framework (Seumas Miller)

Much of the theoretical – as opposed to political – impetus for the process of the socio-politicisation of the ethical in the writings of literary and cultural theorists derives from two tendencies. Firstly, there is the tendency to operate with an insufficiently differentiated notion of social action.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×