Book contents
- Rejecting Compromise
- Rejecting Compromise
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Rejecting Compromise, Getting Gridlock
- 2 Legislators Reject Half-Loaf Compromises
- 3 Legislators Reject Half-Loaf Compromises Because They Fear Voter Retribution
- 4 Primary Voters as the Source of Punishment
- 5 Voter Punishment Is Rare but Real
- 6 Structuring Negotiations in the Shadow of Primary Voter Punishment
- 7 Compromise, Voter Punishment in Primaries, and Legislative Gridlock
- References
- Index
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 January 2020
Book contents
- Rejecting Compromise
- Rejecting Compromise
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Rejecting Compromise, Getting Gridlock
- 2 Legislators Reject Half-Loaf Compromises
- 3 Legislators Reject Half-Loaf Compromises Because They Fear Voter Retribution
- 4 Primary Voters as the Source of Punishment
- 5 Voter Punishment Is Rare but Real
- 6 Structuring Negotiations in the Shadow of Primary Voter Punishment
- 7 Compromise, Voter Punishment in Primaries, and Legislative Gridlock
- References
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Rejecting CompromiseLegislators' Fear of Primary Voters, pp. 147 - 167Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Abramowitz, Alan I. 2012. “Grand Old Tea Party: Partisan Polarization and the Rise of the Tea Party Movement.” In Steep: The Precipitous Rise of the Tea Party, eds. Rosenthal, Lawrence and Trost, Christine. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Adams, James, Merrill, Samuel III, Simas, Elizabeth N., and Stone, Walter J.. 2011. “When Candidates Value Good Character: A Spatial Model with Applications to Congressional Elections.” The Journal of Politics 73 (1): 17–30.Google Scholar
Ahler, Douglas J., Citrin, Jack, and Lenz, Gabriel S.. 2016. “Do Open Primaries Improve Representation? An Experimental Test of California’s 2012 Top‐Two Primary.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 41 (2): 237–68.Google Scholar
Anderson, Sarah E., Butler, Daniel M., and Harbridge, Laurel. 2016. “Legislative Institutions as a Source of Party Leaders’ Influence.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 41 (3): 605–31.Google Scholar
“Another moderate shown the door.” 2012. The Economist, May 12, 2012. [cited April 10, 2018]. Available from www.economist.com/the-economist-explains/2013/09/04/why-are-the-economists-writers-anonymous.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen. 2012. “CCES Common Content, 2010.” hdl:1902.1/17705, Harvard Dataverse, V3.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Schaffner, Brian. 2013. “CCES Common Content, 2012.” hdl:1902.1/21447, Harvard Dataverse, V8.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, Snyder, James M., and Ting, Michael M.. 2003. “Bargaining in Bicameral Legislatures: When and Why Does Malapportionment Matter?” American Political Science Review 97 (3): 471–81.Google Scholar
Anzia, Sarah F., and Jackman, Molly C.. 2013. “Legislative Organization and the Second Face of Power: Evidence from U.S. State Legislatures.” The Journal of Politics 75 (1): 210–24.Google Scholar
Arnold, R. Douglas. 1990. The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Associated Press. 2017. “Illinois Senate overrides Gov. Rauner’s budget veto.” Associated Press, July 4, 2017. [cited July 6, 2017]. Available from www.dailyherald.com/business/20170704/illinois-senate-overrides-rauners-budget-vetoes.Google Scholar
Associated Press. 2018. “Rep. Dan Lipinski narrowly beats Marie Newman in Illinois Democratic primary.” NBC News, March 21, 2018. [cited March 26, 2018]. Available from www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/rep-dan-lapinski-narrowly-beats-marie-newman-illinois-democratic-primary-n858571.Google Scholar
Bade, Rachael, and Caygle, Heather. 2019. “Exasperated Democrats try to rein in Ocasio-Cortez.” Politico, January 11, 2019. [cited January 25, 2019]. Available from www.politico.com/story/2019/01/11/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-democrats-establisment-1093728.Google Scholar
Bai, Matt. 2012. “Obama vs. Boehner: Who killed the debt deal?” The New York Times Magazine, March 28, 2012. [cited September 5, 2017]. Available from www.nytimes.com/2012/04/01/magazine/obama-vs-boehner-who-killed-the-debt-deal.html?mcubz=0.Google Scholar
Bailey, Michael A., Mummolo, Jonathan, and Noel, Hans. 2012. “Tea Party Influence.” American Politics Research 40 (5): 769–804.Google Scholar
Baker, Ross K. 2015. Is Bipartisanship Dead? A Report from the Senate. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
Ballotpedia. 2014a. Partisan Composition of State Houses. [cited July 31, 2014]. Available from http://ballotpedia.org/Partisan_composition_of_state_houses.Google Scholar
Ballotpedia. 2014b. Partisan Composition of State Senates. [cited July 31, 2014]. Available from http://ballotpedia.org/Partisan_composition_of_state_senates.Google Scholar
Ballotpedia. 2014c. State Legislatures with Term Limits. [cited July 31, 2014]. Available from http://ballotpedia.org/State_legislatures_with_term_limits.Google Scholar
Ballotpedia. 2016a. Incumbents with a Primary Challenger in the 2016 State Legislative Elections. [cited March 18, 2019]. Available from https://ballotpedia.org/Incumbents_with_a_primary_challenger_in_the_2016_state_legislative_elections.Google Scholar
Ballotpedia. 2016b. State Legislative Elections. [cited August 18, 2017]. Available from https://ballotpedia.org/State_legislative_elections.Google Scholar
Ballotpedia. 2016c. U.S. House Primaries. [cited August 18, 2017]. Available from https://ballotpedia.org/U.S._House_primaries.Google Scholar
Barber, Michael J. 2016. “Ideological Donors, Contribution Limits, and the Polarization of American Legislatures.” The Journal of Politics 78 (1): 296–310.Google Scholar
Barker, Rocky. 2016. “Land-transfer agitator Chmelik loses in Idaho County.” Idaho Statesman, May 19, 2016. [cited January 4, 2018]. Available from www.idahostatesman.com/news/local/news-columns-blogs/letters-from-the-west/article78731237.htmlGoogle Scholar
Baron, David P., and Ferejohn, John A.. 1989. “Bargaining in Legislatures.” American Political Science Review 83 (4): 1181–206.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 2000. “Partisanship and Voting Behavior: 1952–1996.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (1): 35–50.Google Scholar
Bauer, Nichole M., Yong, Laurel Harbridge, and Krupnikov, Yanna. 2017. “Who Is Punished? Conditions Affecting Voter Evaluations of Legislators Who Do Not Compromise.” Political Behavior 39 (2): 279–300.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R., Berry, Jeffrey M., Hojnacki, Marie, Kimball, David C., and Leech, Beth L.. 2009. Lobbying and Policy Change: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bawn, Kathleen, Cohen, Martin, Karol, David, Masket, Seth, Noel, Hans, and Zaller, John. 2012. “A Theory of Political Parties: Groups, Policy Demands and Nominations in American Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 10 (3): 571–97.Google Scholar
Bennis, Will M., Medin, Douglas L., and Bartels, Daniel M.. 2010. “The Costs and Benefits of Calculation and Moral Rules.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 5 (2): 187–202.Google Scholar
Berman, Russell. 2015. “Paul Ryan’s Uneasy Alliance with the House Freedom Caucus.” The Atlantic, October 22, 2015. [cited December 19, 2017]. Available from www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/10/paul-ryans-uneasy-alliance-with-the-house-freedom-caucus/411715/.Google Scholar
Bertelli, Anthony M., and Grose, Christian R.. 2006. “The Spatial Model and the Senate Trial of President Clinton.” American Politics Research 34 (4): 535–59.Google Scholar
Bianco, William T. 1994. Trust: Representatives and Constituents. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Binder, Sarah. 2003. Stalemate: Causes and Consequences of Legislative Gridlock. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Binder, Sarah. 2014. “Polarized We Govern?” Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Binder, Sarah. 2015. “Can Paul Ryan disarm the Freedom Caucus?” The Washington Post, October 25, 2015. [cited December 19, 2017]. Available from www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2015/10/26/can-paul-ryan-disarm-the-freedom-caucus/?utm_term=.03af4621fe66.Google Scholar
Binder, Sarah A., and Lee, Frances E.. 2016. “Making Deals in Congress.” In Political Negotiation, ed. Mansbridge, J. and Martin, C. J.. Washington, DC: Brookings. pp. 91–117.Google Scholar
Binning, Kevin R., Sherman, David K., Cohen, Geoffrey L., and Heitland, Kirsten. 2010. “Seeing the Other Side: Reducing Political Partisanship via Self-Affirmation in the 2008 Presidential Election.” Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy 10 (1): 276–92.Google Scholar
Birnbaum, Jeffrey H., and Murray, Alan S.. 1987. Showdown at Gucci Gulch: Lawmakers, Lobbyists, and the Unlikely Triumph of Tax Reform. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Bishin, Benjamin G. 2000. “Constituency Influence in Congress: Does Subconstituency Matter?” Legislative Studies Quarterly 25 (3): 389–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boatright, Robert G. 2013. Getting Primaried: The Changing Politics of Congressional Primary Challenges. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Bolsen, Toby, Druckman, James N., and Cook, Fay Lomax. 2014. “The Influence of Partisan Motivated Reasoning on Public Opinion.” Political Behavior 36 (2): 235–62.Google Scholar
Bond, Jon R. 2013. “‘Life Ain’t Easy for a President Named Barack’: Party, Ideology, and Tea Party Freshman Support for the Nation’s First Black President.” The Forum 11 (2): 243–58.Google Scholar
Bonica, Adam. 2013. “Ideology and Interests in the Political Marketplace.” American Journal of Political Science 57 (2): 294–311.Google Scholar
Bornemeier, James. 1996. “Reform of Pesticide Rules Passes House Unanimously.” Los Angeles Times, July 24, 1996. [cited September 5, 2017]. Available from http://articles.latimes.com/1996-07-24/news/mn-27420_1_agricultural-pesticides.Google Scholar
Bradner, Eric. 2015. “How secretive Is the Trans-Pacific Partnership?” CNN, June 12, 2015. [cited September 5, 2017]. Available from www.cnn.com/2015/06/11/politics/trade-deal-secrecy-tpp/index.html.Google Scholar
Brady, David W., Han, Hahrie, and Pope, Jeremy C.. 2007. “Primary Elections and Candidate Ideology: Out-of-Step with the Primary Electorate?” Legislative Studies Quarterly 32 (1): 79–105.Google Scholar
Brady, David W., and Volden, Craig. 1998. Revolving Gridlock. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Broockman, David E., and Butler, Daniel M.. 2017. “The Causal Effects of Elite Position‐Taking on Voter Attitudes: Field Experiments with Elite Communication.” American Journal of Political Science 61 (1): 208–21.Google Scholar
Broockman, David E., and Skovron, Christopher. 2018. “Bias in Perceptions of Public Opinion Among American Political Elites.” American Political Science Review 112 (3): 542–63.Google Scholar
Brown, Bert R. 1977. “Face-Saving and Face-Restoration in Negotiation.” In Negotiations: Social-Psychological Perspectives, ed. Druckman, D.. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Bullock, Dennis R. 2016. “Of principle and compromise: A paradox within America’s political discourse.” The Hill, December 4, 2016. [cited January 26, 2018]. Available from http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/politics/308578-of-principle-and-compromise-a-paradox-within-americas-political.Google Scholar
Burden, Barry C. 2001. “The Polarizing Effects of Congressional Primaries.” In Congressional Primaries and the Politics of Representation, ed. Galderisi, P. F., Ezra, M., and Lyons, M.. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 95–115.Google Scholar
Burden, Barry C. 2011. “Polarization, Obstruction, and Governing in the Senate.” The Forum 9 (4):Article 4.Google Scholar
Butler, Daniel M. 2009. “The Effect of the Size of Voting Blocs on Incumbents’ Roll-Call Voting and the Asymmetric Polarization of Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 34 (3): 297–318.Google Scholar
Butler, Daniel M., and Powell, Eleanor Neff. 2014. “Understanding the Party Brand: Experimental Evidence on the Role of Valence.” The Journal of Politics 76 (2): 492–505.Google Scholar
Butler, Daniel M., Volden, Craig, Dynes, Adam M., and Shor, Boris. 2017. “Ideology, Learning, and Policy Diffusion: Experimental Evidence.” American Journal of Political Science 61 (1): 37–49.Google Scholar
Cameron, Charles M. 2000. Veto Bargaining: Presidents and the Politics of Negative Power. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Phillip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Campbell, David E., and Putnam, Robert D.. 2011. “Crashing the Tea Party.” The New York Times, August 16, 2011. [cited August 18, 2017]. Available from www.nytimes.com/2011/08/17/opinion/crashing-the-tea-party.html?mcubz=0.Google Scholar
Canes-Wrone, Brandice, Brady, David W., and Cogan, John F.. 2002. “Out of Step, Out of Office: Electoral Accountability and House Members’ Voting.” American Political Science Review 96 (1): 127–40.Google Scholar
Canes-Wrone, Brandice, Minozzi, William, and Reveley, Jessica Bonney. 2011. “Issue Accountability and the Mass Public.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 36 (1): 5–35.Google Scholar
Cannon, Michael F. 2017. “GOP healthcare bill Is not repeal – it is ObamaCare-lite, or worse.” The Hill, May 4, 2017. [cited February 4, 2019]. Available from https://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/healthcare/331987-this-is-not-repeal-it-is-obamacare-lite-or-worse.Google Scholar
Carey, John M., Niemi, Richard G., Powell, Lynda W., and Moncrief, Gary. 2002. State Legislative Survey. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].Google Scholar
Carson, Jamie, Crespin, Michael H., Eaves, Carrie P., and Wanless, Emily. 2011a. “Constituency Congruency and Candidate Competition in U.S. House Elections.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 36 (3): 461–82.Google Scholar
Carson, Jamie, Crespin, Michael H., Eaves, Carrie P., and Wanless, Emily O.. 2012. “Constituency Congruency and Candidate Competition in Primary Elections for the U.S. House.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 12 (2): 127–45.Google Scholar
Carson, Jamie L., Crespin, Michael H., Finocchiaro, Charles J., and Rohde, David W.. 2007. “Redistricting and Party Polarization in the US House of Representatives.” American Politics Research 35 (6): 878–904.Google Scholar
Carson, Jamie L., Koger, Gregory, Lebo, Matthew J., and Young, Everett. 2010. “The Electoral Costs of Party Loyalty in Congress.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (3): 598–616.Google Scholar
Carson, Jamie L., Monroe, Nathan W., and Robinson, Gregory. 2011b. “Unpacking Agenda Control in Congress: Individual Roll Rates and the Republican Revolution.” Political Research Quarterly 64 (1): 17–30.Google Scholar
Claassen, Ryan L., and Nicholson, Stephen P.. 2013. “Extreme Voices, Interest Groups and the Misrepresentation of Issue Publics.” Public Opinion Quarterly 77 (4): 861–87.Google Scholar
Clifford, Scott, and Jerit, Jennifer. 2013. “How Words Do the Work of Politics: Moral Foundations Theory and the Debate over Stem Cell Research.” The Journal of Politics 75 (3): 659–71.Google Scholar
Clinton, Joshua D., and Meirowitz, Adam. 2004. “Testing Explanations of Strategic Voting in Legislatures: A Reexamination of the Compromise of 1790.” American Journal of Political Science 48 (4): 675–89.Google Scholar
CNN Political Unit. 2012. “In statement, Lugar defends campaign while criticizing partisan environment.” CNN Politics, May 8, 2012. [cited April 20, 2018]. Available from http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/05/08/in-statement-lugar-defends-campaign-while-criticizing-partisan-environment/.Google Scholar
Cohen, Geoffrey L., Sherman, David K., Bastardi, Anthony, Hsu, Lillian, McGoey, Michelle, and Ross, Lee. 2007. “Bridging the Partisan Divide: Self-Affirmation Reduces Ideological Closed-Mindedness and Inflexibility in Negotiation.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 93 (3): 415–30.Google Scholar
“Congressional Record, December 13.” 2007. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
“Congressional Record, June 7.” 2000. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
“Congressional Record, June 26.” 2008. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
“Congressional Record, June 30.” 2010. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
“Congressional Record, May 2.” 1996. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
“Congressional Record, May 14.” 2003. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
“Congressional Record, May 14.” 2008. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Converse, Phillip E. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, ed. Apter, D. E.. New York: Free Press. pp. 206–31.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1993. Legislative Leviathan. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crisp, Brian F., Desposato, Scott W., and Kanthak, Kristin. 2011. “Legislative Pivots, Presidential Powers, and Policy Stability.” The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 27 (2): 426–52.Google Scholar
Curry, James M. 2015. Legislating in the Dark: Information and Power in the House of Representatives. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Curry, James M., and Lee, Frances E.. 2016. “Congress is far more bipartisan than headlines suggest.” The Washington Post. December 20, 2016. [cited March 10, 2017]. Available from www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/12/20/congress-is-far-more-bipartisan-than-headlines-suggest/?utm_term=.314562d526c5.Google Scholar
Davey, Monica. 2012. “Lugar Loses Primary Challenge in Indiana.” The New York Times, May 8, 2012. [cited April 20, 2018]. Available from www.nytimes.com/2012/05/09/us/politics/lugar-loses-primary-challenge-in-indiana.html.Google Scholar
DeBell, Matthew, Wilson, Catherine, Segura, Gary, Jackman, Simon, and Hutchings, Vincent. 2012. “Methodology Report and User’s Guide for the ANES 2010–2012 Evaluations of Government and Society Study.” ed. American National Election Study. Palo Alto, CA and Ann Arbor, MI: Stanford University and University of Michigan.Google Scholar
“Default Avoided at Eleventh Hour.” 2011. In CQ Almanac, ed. Austin, J.. Washington, DC: CQ-Roll Call Group, 2012.Google Scholar
Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Keeter, Scott. 1996. What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Demko, Paul. 2017. “How the Senate health bill became ‘Obamacare lite’.” Politico, July 6, 2017. [cited February 4, 2019]. Available from www.politico.com/story/2017/07/06/republican-senate-struggles-obamacare-240278.Google Scholar
Democratic Platform Committee. 2016. “2016 Democratic Party Platform.” Available at www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/2016-democratic-party-platform.Google Scholar
Ditto, Peter H., and Mastronarde, Andrew J.. 2009. “The Paradox of the Political Maverick.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 45 (1): 295–98.Google Scholar
Druckman, Daniel. 1993. “The Situational Levers of Negotiating Flexibility.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 37 (2): 236–76.Google Scholar
Druckman, Daniel. 1994. “Determinants of Compromising Behavior in Negotiation: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 38 (3): 507–56.Google Scholar
Druckman, Daniel. 1995. “Situational Levers of Position Change: Further Explorations.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 542 (1): 61–80.Google Scholar
Druckman, Daniel, and Druckman, James N.. 1996. “Visibility and Negotiating Flexibility.” The Journal of Social Psychology 136 (1): 117–20.Google Scholar
Druckman, James N., Peterson, Erik, and Slothuus, Rune. 2013. “How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation.” American Political Science Review 107 (1): 57–79.Google Scholar
Durrant, Jeffrey O. 2007. Struggle Over Utah’s San Rafael Swell: Wilderness, National Conservation Areas, and National Monuments. Tucson, AZ: The University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Egan, Patrick J. 2014. “‘Do Something’ Politics and Double-Peaked Policy Preferences.” Journal of Politics 76 (2): 333–49.Google Scholar
Elving, Ronald D. 1995. Conflict & Compromise: How Congress Makes the Law. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Enelow, James M., and Hinich, Melvin J.. 1984. The Spatial Theory of Voting: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
E&E Daily. 2010. “Senate Climate Debate: The 60-vote Climb.” May 12, 2010. [cited March 22, 2018]. Available from www.eenews.net/eed/documents/climate_debate_senate.pdf.Google Scholar
Epstein, David, and Peter, Zemsky. 1995. “Money Talks: Deterring Quality Challengers in Congressional Elections.” American Political Science Review 89 (2): 295–308.Google Scholar
Esterling, Kevin M., Neblo, Michael A., and Lazer, David M. J.. 2011. “Means, Motive, and Opportunity in Becoming Informed about Politics: A Deliberative Field Experiment with Members of Congress and Their Constituents.” Public Opinion Quarterly 75 (3): 483–503.Google Scholar
Feinberg, Matthew, and Willer, Robb. 2013. “The Moral Roots of Environmental Attitudes.” Psychological Science 24 (1): 56–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fenno, Richard F. Jr. 1978. Home Style: Home Members in Their Districts. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1974. Representatives, Roll Calls, and Constituencies. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P. 1983. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fiorina, Morris P., Abrams, Samuel, and Pope, Jeremy. 2005. Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America. New York: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
Fisher, Samuel H. III, and Herrick, Rebekah. 2013. “Old versus New: The Comparative Efficiency of Mail and Internet Surveys of State Legislators ”State Politics & Policy Quarterly 13 (2): 147–63.Google Scholar
Flynn, D. J., and Harbridge, Laurel. 2016. “How Partisan Conflict in Congress Affects Public Opinion: Strategies, Outcomes, and Issue Differences.” American Politics Research 44 (5): 875–902.Google Scholar
Fowler, Linda L. 1982. “How Interest Groups Select Issues for Rating Voting Records of Members of the US Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 7 (3): 401–13.Google Scholar
Fox, Justin, and Rothenberg, Lawrence. 2011. “Influence Without Bribes: A Noncontracting Model of Campaign Giving and Policymaking.” Political Analysis 19 (3): 325–41.Google Scholar
Gaertner, Samuel L., and Dovidio, John F.. 2011. “Common Ingroup Identity Model.” In The Encyclopedia of Peace Psychology, ed. Christie, Daniel J.. Malden: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Garcia, Monique, and Geiger, Kim. 2017. “Madigan’s House approves major income tax hike as Republicans break with Rauner.” Chicago Tribune, July 2, 2017. [cited July 6, 2017]. Available from www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/politics/ct-illinois-budget-madigan-tax-hike-vote-met-0703-20170702-story.html.Google Scholar
Gerber, Elisabeth R., and Morton, Rebecca B.. 1998. “Primary Election Systems and Representation.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 14 (2): 304–24.Google Scholar
Gilens, Martin. 2005. “Inequality and Democratic Responsiveness.” Public Opinion Quarterly 69 (5): 778–96.Google Scholar
Gilens, Martin, and Page, Benjamin I.. 2014. “Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens.” Perspectives on Politics 12 (3): 564–81.Google Scholar
Gilmour, John B. 1995. Strategic Disagreement. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Ginges, Jeremy, Atran, Scott, Medin, Douglas, and Shikaki, Khalil. 2007. “Sacred Bounds on Rational Resolution of Violent Political Conflict.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104 (18): 7357–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glaser, James M. 2006. “Public Support for Political Compromise on a Volatile Racial Issue: Insight from the Survey Experiment.” Political Psychology 27 (3): 423–39.Google Scholar
Graham, Jesse, Haidt, Jonathan, and Nosek, Brian A.. 2009. “Liberals and Conservatives Rely on Different Sets of Moral Foundations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 96 (5): 1029.Google Scholar
Green, Donald, Palmquist, Bradley, and Schickler, Eric. 2002. Partisan Hearts and Minds. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Greene, Steven. 2004. “Social Identity Theory and Party Identification.” Social Science Quarterly 85 (1): 136–53.Google Scholar
Griffin, John D., and Newman, Brian. 2005. “Are Voters Better Represented?” The Journal of Politics 67 (4): 1206–27.Google Scholar
Grose, Christian R., Malhotra, Neil, and Van Houweling, Robert Parks. 2015. “Explaining Explanations: How Legislators Explain Their Policy Positions and How Citizens React.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (3): 724–43.Google Scholar
Groseclose, Tim, and McCarty, Nolan. 2001. “The Politics of Blame: Bargaining before an Audience.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (1): 100–19.Google Scholar
Grossmann, Matt, and Hopkins, David A.. 2015. “Ideological Republicans and Group Interest Democrats: The Asymmetry of American Party Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 13 (1): 119–39.Google Scholar
Grumbach, Jacob M. 2018. “From Backwaters to Major Policymakers: Policy Polarization in the States, 1970–2014.” Perspectives on Politics 16 (2): 416–35.Google Scholar
Gutmann, Amy, and Thompson, Dennis. 2012. The Spirit of Compromise: Why Governing Demands It and Campaigning Undermines It. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Andrew B. 2015. “What Happens When Extremists Win Primaries?” American Political Science Review 109 (1): 18–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, John Mark. 1991. Gaining Access: Congress and the Farm Lobby, 1919–1981. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Harbridge, Laurel. 2015. Is Bipartisanship Dead? Policy Agreement and Agenda-Setting in the House of Representatives. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harbridge, Laurel, and Malhotra, Neil. 2011. “Electoral Incentives and Partisan Conflict in Congress: Evidence from Survey Experiments.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (3): 1–17.Google Scholar
Harbridge, Laurel, Malhotra, Neil, and Harrison, Brian F.. 2014. “Public Preferences for Bipartisanship in the Policymaking Process.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 39 (3): 327–55.Google Scholar
Harden, Jeffrey J. 2013. “Multidimensional Responsiveness: The Determinants of Legislators’ Representational Priorities.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 38 (2): 155–84.Google Scholar
Harden, Jeffrey J., and Kirkland, Justin H.. 2016. “Do Campaign Donors Influence Polarization? Evidence from Public Financing in the American States.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 41 (1): 119–52.Google Scholar
Hill, Seth J. 2015. “Institution of Nomination and the Policy Ideology of Primary Electorates.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 10 (4): 461–87.Google Scholar
Hirano, Shigeo, Snyder, James M., Ansolabehere, Stephen Daniel, and Hansen, John Mark. 2010. “Primary Elections and Partisan Polarization in the U.S. Congress.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 5 (2): 169–91.Google Scholar
Holbrook, Allyson L., Krosnick, Jon A., and Pfent, Alison. 2008. “The Causes and Consequences of Response Rates in Surveys by the New Media and Government Contractor Survey Research Firms.” In Advances in Telephone Survey Methodology, ed. Lepkowski, J. M., Tucker, C., Brick, J. M., de Lecuw, E., Japec, L., Lavrakas, P. J., Link, M. W., and Sangster, R. L.. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. pp. 499–528.Google Scholar
House of Representatives Resources Committee. 2000. “Report on the San Rafael Western Legacy District and National Conservation Act to Accompany H.R. 3605.” Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Hujer, Marc, and Schmitz, Gregor Peter. 2011. “Interview with Tea Party Co-Founder Mark Meckler ‘We Have Compromised Our Way Into Disaster’.” Spiegel Online, August 1, 2011. [cited April 10, 2018]. Available from www.spiegel.de/international/world/interview-with-tea-party-co-founder-mark-meckler-we-have-compromised-our-way-into-disaster-a-777705.html.Google Scholar
Humphreys, Macartan, Sanchez de la Sierra, Raul, and van der Windt, Peter. 2013. “Fishing, Commitment, and Communication: A Proposal for Comprehensive Nonbinding Research Registration.” Political Analysis 21 (1): 1–20.Google Scholar
Huntsman, Jon, and Manchin, Joe, eds. 2014. No Labels: A Shared Vision for a Stronger America. New York: Diversion Books.Google Scholar
Hutchings, Vincent, Brader, Ted, Iyengar, Shanto, Segura, Gary, and Jackman, Simon. 2017. “User’s Guide and Codebook for the ANES 2016 Time Series Study.” ed. American National Election Study. Palo Alto and Ann Arbor: Stanford University and University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Hutchings, Vincent, Brader, Ted, Iyengar, Shanto, Segura, Gary, and Jackman, Simon. 2018. “American National Election Studies Time Series Cumulative Data File 1948–2016.” ed. American National Election Study. Palo Alto and Ann Arbor: Stanford University and University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Inskeep, Steve. 2019. “We Need to Work Together to Reopen Government, Rep. Suozzi Says.” NPR Morning Edition, January 17, 2019. [cited February 1, 2019]. Available from www.npr.org/2019/01/17/686135349/we-need-to-work-together-to-reopen-government-rep-suozzi-says.Google Scholar
Interview with Ronald Reagan. 1980. “An Extremist? ‘I’ll Run on My Record’.” U.S. News & World Report, May 5, 1980, Retrieved from Nexis Uni.Google Scholar
Iyengar, Shanto, Hahn, Kyu S., Krosnick, Jon A., and Walker, John. 2008. “Selective Exposure to Campaign Communication: The Role of Anticipated Agreement and Issue Public Membership.” The Journal of Politics 70 (1): 186–200.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 2011. “The President, the Tea Party, and Voting Behavior in 2010: Insights from the Cooperative Congressional Election Study.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Seattle.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 2014. “Strategic Politicians and the Dynamics of U.S. House Elections, 1946–86.” American Political Science Review 83 (3): 773–93.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C., and Kernell, Samuel. 1983. Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections. 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Janofsky, Michael. 2000. “Tire Tracks Ignite a Debate About Pristine Tract in Utah.” The New York Times, March 11, 2000. [cited January 26, 2019]. Available from www.nytimes.com/2000/03/11/us/tire-tracks-ignite-a-debate-about-pristine-tract-in-utah.html.Google Scholar
Jansa, Joshua M., and Hoyman, Michele M.. 2018. “Do Unions Punish Democrats? Free-Trade Votes and Labor PAC Contributions, 1999–2012.” Political Research Quarterly 71 (2): 424–39.Google Scholar
Jessee, Stephen A. 2009. “Spatial Voting in the 2004 Presidential Election.” American Political Science Review 103 (1): 59–81.Google Scholar
Jessee, Stephen A. 2012. Ideology and Spatial Voting in American Elections. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jochim, Ashley E., and Jones, Bryan D.. 2013. “Issue Politics in a Polarized Congress.” Political Research Quarterly 66 (2): 352–69.Google Scholar
Joesten, Danielle A., and Stone, Walter J.. 2014. “Reassessing Proximity Voting: Expertise, Party, and Choice in Congressional Elections.” The Journal of Politics 76 (3): 740–53.Google Scholar
Jones, Bryan D., Sulkin, Tracy, and Larsen, Heather R.. 2003. “Policy Punctuations in American Political Institutions.” American Political Science Review 97 (1): 151–69.Google Scholar
Jordan, Karen, and Burton, Cheryl. 2018. “Des Plaines adopts vaping ordinance supported by Main West High School.” ABC 7 News, May 7, 2018. [cited January 22, 2019]. Available from https://abc7chicago.com/health/des-plaines-adopts-vaping-ordinance-supported-by-maine-west/3440337/.Google Scholar
Kahan, Dan M., and Braman, Donald. 2006. “Cultural Cognition and Public Policy.” Yale Law & Policy Review 24 (1): 149–72.Google Scholar
Kalla, Joshua L., and Broockman, David E.. 2017. “The Minimal Persuasive Effects of Campaign Contact in General Elections: Evidence from 49 Field Experiments.” American Political Science Review 112 (1): 148–66.Google Scholar
Kanthak, Kristin. 2002. “Top-Down Divergence: The Effect of Party-Determined Power on Candidate Ideological Placement.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 14 (3): 301–23.Google Scholar
Kanthak, Kristin, and Morton, Rebecca. 2001. “The Effects of Electoral Rules on Congressional Primaries.” In Congressional Primaries and the Politics of Representation, ed. Galderisi, P.F., Ezra, M., and Lyons, M.. Boulder: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. pp. 116–31.Google Scholar
Karol, David. 2015. “Party Activists, Interest Groups, and Polarization in American Politics.” In American Gridlock: The Sources, Character, and Impact of Political Polarization, ed. Thurber, J. A. and Yoshinaka, A.. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 68–85.Google Scholar
Karpowitz, Christopher F., and Mansbridge, Jane. 2005. “Disagreement and Consensus: The Importance of Dynamic Updating in Public Deliberation.” In The Deliberative Democracy Handbook, ed. Gastil, J. and Levine, P.. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. pp. 237–53.Google Scholar
Karpowitz, Christopher F., and Mendelberg, Tali. 2007. “Groups and Deliberation.” Swiss Political Science Review 13 (4): 645–62.Google Scholar
Karpowitz, Christopher F., Mendelberg, Tali, and Shaker, L. E. E.. 2012. “Gender Inequality in Deliberative Participation.” American Political Science Review 106 (3): 533–47.Google Scholar
Karpowitz, Christopher F., Monson, J. Quin, Patterson, Kelly D., and Pope, Jeremy C.. 2011. “Tea Time in America? The Impact of the Tea Party Movement on the 2010 Midterm Elections.” PS: Political Science & Politics 44 (2): 303–9.Google Scholar
Key, Vladimir O. 1966. The Responsible Electorate: Rationality in Presidential Voting, 1936–1960. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., and Kalmoe, Nathan P.. 2017. Neither Liberal nor Conservative: Ideological Innocence in the American Public. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kirkland, Justin H., and Harden, Jeffrey J.. 2016. “Representation, Competing Principals, and Waffling on Bills in US Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 41 (3): 657–86.Google Scholar
Klar, Samara. 2013. “The Influence of Competing Identity Primes on Political Preferences.” The Journal of Politics 75 (4): 1108–24.Google Scholar
Koger, Gregory. 2003. “Position Taking and Cosponsorship in the U.S. House.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 28 (2): 225–46.Google Scholar
Koger, Gregory, and Lebo, Matthew J.. 2017. Strategic Party Government: Why Winning Trumps Ideology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Korecki, Natasha. 2017. “Illinois lawmakers face budget rage.” Politico, July 5, 2017. [cited July 6, 2017]. Available from www.politico.com/story/2017/07/05/illinois-budget-rage-240243.Google Scholar
Kousser, Thad, and Phillips, Justin H.. 2009. “Who Blinks First? Legislative Patience and Bargaining with Governors.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 34 (1): 55–86.Google Scholar
Kramer, Roderick M., Pommerenke, Pamela, and Newton, Elizabeth. 1993. “The Social Context of Negotiation: Effects of Social Identity and Interpersonal Accountability on Negotiator Decision Making.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 37 (4): 633–54.Google Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith, and Rivers, Douglas. 1988. “The Analysis of Committee Power: An Application to Senate Voting on the Minimum Wage.” American Journal of Political Science 32 (4): 1151–74.Google Scholar
Krosnick, Jon A. 1990. “Government Policy and Citizen Passion: A Study of Issue Publics in Contemporary America.” Political Behavior 12 (1): 59–92.Google Scholar
Krosnick, Jon A., Berent, Matthew K., and Boninger, David S.. 1994. “Pockets of Responsibility in the American Electorate: Findings of a Research Program on Attitude Importance.” Political Communication 11 (4): 391–411.Google Scholar
Krosnick, Jon, and Telhami, Shibley. 1995. “Public Attitudes Toward Israel: A Study of the Attentive and Issue Publics.” International Studies Quarterly 39 (4): 535–44.Google Scholar
Kull, Steven, and Destler, I. M.. 1999. Misreading the Public: The Myth of a New Isolationism. Washington, DC: Brooking Institution Press.Google Scholar
Kuster, Ann McLane. 2013. “Kuster Calls for Common Sense, Compromise In Speech at New England Council.” May 11, 2013. House of Representatives, Member Press Release. [cited March 22, 2018]. Available from https://kuster.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/kuster-calls-for-common-sense-compromise-in-speech-at-new-england.Google Scholar
La Raja, Raymond J., and Schaffner, Brian F.. 2015. Campaign Finance and Political Polarization: When Purists Prevail. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 2002. Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 2014. The All New Don’t Think of an Elephant!: Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. White River Junction: Chelsea Green Publishing.Google Scholar
Lane, Eric, and Oreskes, Michael. 2007. The Genius of America: How the Constitution Saved Our Country – and Why It Can Again. New York: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar
Lavine, Howard, Johnston, Christopher, and Steenbergen, Marco. 2012. The Ambivalent Partisan. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lebo, Matthew J., McGlynn, Adam J., and Koger, Gregory. 2007. “Strategic Party Government: Party Influence in Congress, 1789–2000.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (3): 464–81.Google Scholar
Lee, Frances E. 2009. Beyond Ideology: Politics, Principles, and Partisanship in the U.S. Senate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lee, Frances E. 2016. Insecure Majorities: Congress and the Perpetual Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Leighley, Jan E., and Oser, Jennifer. 2017. “Representation in an Era of Political and Economic Inequality: How and When Citizen Engagement Matters.” Perspectives on Politics 16 (2): 328–44.Google Scholar
Lenz, Gabriel S. 2013. Follow the Leader? How Voters Response to Politicians’ Policies and Performance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lerner, Jennifer S., and Tetlock, Philip E.. 1999. “Accounting for the Effects of Accountability.” Psychological Bulletin 125 (2): 255–75.Google Scholar
Levendusky, Matthew. 2009. The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levitt, Stephen. 1996. “How Do Senators Vote? Disentangling the Role of Voter Preferences, Party Affiliation, and Senator Ideology.” American Economic Review 86 (2): 425–41.Google Scholar
Lin, C.-Y. Cynthia, and Prince, Lea. 2009. “The Optimal Gas Tax for California.” Energy Policy 37 (12): 5173–83.Google Scholar
Lott, Trent, and Daschle, Tom. 2017. Crisis Point: Why We Must – and How We Can – Overcome Our Broken Politics in Washington and Across America. New York: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar
Maestas, Cherie, Neeley, Grant W., and Jr. Richardson, Lilliard E.. 2003. “The State of Surveying Legislators: Dilemmas and Suggestions.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 3 (1): 90–108.Google Scholar
Mann, Thomas, and Ornstein, Norman J.. 2012. It’s Even Worse Than It Looks: How the American Constitutional System Collided with the Politics of Extremism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Maoz, Ifat. 2012. “Threats versus Promises: How the Framing of Concession Appeals in News Coverage Affects Support for Compromise.” International Journal of Communication 6: 2280–300.Google Scholar
Mason, George. 1892. “Letter to His Son on May 27, 1787.” In The Life of George Mason, 1725–1792, ed. Rowland, K. M.. New York: G.P. Putnam’s Sons.Google Scholar
Mason, Lilliana. 2013. “The Rise of Uncivil Agreement: Issue versus Behavioral Polarization in the American Electorate.” American Behavioral Scientist 57 (1): 140–59.Google Scholar
Mason, Lilliana. 2015. “‘I Disrespectfully Agree’: The Differential Effects of Partisan Sorting on Social and Issue Polarization.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (1): 128–45.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Ideology and Unequal Riches. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
McCormack, John. 2011. “Toomey: Dems Rejected Compromise, Demanded $1 Trillion Tax Hike.” The Weekly Standard, November 22, 2011. [cited July 19, 2017]. Available from www.weeklystandard.com/toomey-dems-rejected-compromise-demanded-1-trillion-tax-hike/article/610027.Google Scholar
McGhee, Eric, Masket, Seth, Shor, Boris, Rogers, Steven, and McCarty, Nolan. 2014. “A Primary Cause of Partisanship? Nomination Systems and Legislator Ideology.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (2): 337–51.Google Scholar
McGhee, Eric, and Shor, Boris. 2017. “Has the Top Two Primary Elected More Moderates?” Perspectives on Politics 15 (4): 1053–66.Google Scholar
McGreevy, Patrick. 2017. “He rallied support for California’s climate change fight. Now Chad Mayes is out as Assembly Republican leader.” Los Angeles Times, August 24, 2017. [cited February 4, 2018]. Available from www.latimes.com/politics/la-pol-ca-republicans-assembly-leader-dahle-20170824-story.html.Google Scholar
Memoli, Michael A. 2014. “Eric Cantor upset: How Dave Brat pulled off a historic Political Coup.” Los Angeles Times, June 11, 2014. [cited August 18, 2017]. Available from www.latimes.com/nation/politics/politicsnow/la-pn-eric-cantor-dave-brat-primary-20140611-story.html.Google Scholar
Miller, Warren R., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1963. “Constituency Influence in Congress.” American Political Science Review 57 (1): 45–56.Google Scholar
Moe, Alexandra. 2010. “Just 32% of Tea Party Candidates Win.” NBC News, November 3, 2010. [cited August 18, 2017]. Available from http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2010/11/03/5403120-just-32-of-tea-party-candidates-win.Google Scholar
Monogan, James E. III 2013. “A Case for Registering Studies of Political Outcomes: An Application in the 2010 House Elections.” Political Analysis 21 (1): 21–37.Google Scholar
Montanaro, Domenico. 2018. “John McCain Makes an Appeal for Civility and Humility.” NPR, May 1, 2018. [cited May 2, 2018]. Available from www.npr.org/2018/05/01/607193169/john-mccain-makes-an-appeal-for-civility-and-humility.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Jacob M., Nyhan, Brendan, and Torres, Michelle. 2018. “How Conditioning on Posttreatment Variables Can Ruin Your Experiment and What to Do about It.” American Journal of Political Science 62 (3): 760–75.Google Scholar
Mooney, Christopher Z., and Schuldt, Richard G.. 2008. “Does Morality Policy Exist? Testing a Basic Assumption.” Policy Studies Journal 36 (2): 199–218.Google Scholar
Nall, Clayton. 2015. “The Political Consequences of Spatial Policies: How Interstate Highways Facilitated Geographic Polarization.” The Journal of Politics 77 (2): 394–406.Google Scholar
National Conference of State Legislatures. 2013. Women in State Legislatures: 2013 Legislative Session. [cited July 21, 2014]. Available from www.ncsl.org/legislators-sta/legislators/womens-legislative-network/women-in-state-legislatures-for-2013.aspx.Google Scholar
National Conference of State Legislatures. 2014. NCSL ‘Transportation Funding and Finance Legislation Database. [cited April 23, 2018]. Available from www.ncsl.org/research/transportation/ncsl-transportation-funding-nance-legis-database.aspx.Google Scholar
Neblo, Michael A., Esterling, Kevin M., Kennedy, Ryan P., Lazer, David M. J., and Sokhey, Anand E.. 2010. “Who Wants to Deliberate—And Why?” American Political Science Review 104 (3): 566–83.Google Scholar
Newport, Frank. 2017. “Americans Favor Compromise to Get Things Done in Washington.” Gallup, October 9, 2017. [cited January 26, 2018]. Available from http://news.gallup.com/poll/220265/americans-favor-compromise-things-done-washington.aspx?g_source=POLITICS&g_medium=topic&g_campaign=tiles.Google Scholar
Newport, Frank, and Saad, Lydia. 2016. “Congress’ Harshest Critics Identify a Crisis of Influence.” Gallup. [cited August 2, 2016]. Available from www.gallup.com/poll/193079/congress-harshest-critics-identify-crisis-influence.aspx.Google Scholar
No Labels. 2016. No Labels Stakes Out a National Agenda, February 2, 2016. [cited July 17, 2017]. Available from www.nolabels.org/blog/press/no-labels-stakes-out-a-national-agenda/.Google Scholar
No Labels. 2017. No Labels Philosophy. [cited July 19, 2017]. Available from www.nolabels.org/philosophy/.Google Scholar
Norrander, Barbara, and Wendland, Jay. 2016. “Open versus Closed Primaries and the Ideological Composition of Presidential Primary Electorates.” Electoral Studies 42: 229–36.Google Scholar
North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nyhan, Brendan, McGhee, Eric, Sides, John, Masket, Seth, and Greene, Steven. 2012. “One Vote Out of Step? The Effects of Salient Roll Call Votes in the 2010 Election.” American Politics Research 40 (5): 844–79.Google Scholar
Olivella, Santiago, Kanthak, Kristin, and Crisp, Brian F.. 2017. “… And Keeping Your Enemies Closer: Building Reputations for Facing Electoral Challenges.” Electoral Studies 46: 75–86.Google Scholar
Paletta, Damian, and Stein, Jeff. 2017. “Sweeping Tax Overhaul Clears Congress.” The Washington Post, December 20, 2017. [cited February 4, 2019]. Available from www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/gop-tax-bill-passes-congress-as-trump-prepares-to-sign-it-into-law/2017/12/20/0ba2fd98-e597-11e7-9ec2-518810e7d44d_story.html?utm_term=.3290572894ab.Google Scholar
Paris, Celia. 2017. “Breaking Down Bipartisanship: When and Why Citizens React to Cooperation Across Party Lines.” Public Opinion Quarterly 81 (2): 473–94.Google Scholar
Parker, Christopher S., and Barreto, Matt A.. 2014. Change They Can’t Believe In: The Tea Party and Reactionary Politics in America-Updated Edition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Parry, Ian W. H., and Small, Kenneth A.. 2005. “Does Britain or the United States Have the Right Gasoline Tax?” The American Economic Review 95 (4): 1276–89.Google Scholar
Patty, John W. 2016. “Signaling Through Obstruction.” American Journal of Political Science 60 (1): 175–89.Google Scholar
Pear, Robert, and Kaplan, Thomas. 2017. “House Republicans Unveil Plan to Replace Health Laq.” The New York Times, March 6, 2017.Google Scholar
Pearson, Rick. 2018. “House Republican Leader Jim Durkin Faces Rare Primary Challenge, Symbolizing GOP Conflict.” Chicago Tribune, March 16, 2018. [cited March 27, 2018]. Available from www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/politics/ct-met-jim-durkin-primary-challenge-20180316-story.html.Google Scholar
Pendergast, William R. 1990. “Managing the Negotiation Agenda.” Negotiation Journal 6 (2): 135–45.Google Scholar
Penn, Elizabeth Maggie. 2009. “A Model of Farsighted Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 53 (1): 36–54.Google Scholar
Perkins, Luke. 2017. “Attempt to Spare Hospitals a $264 Million Cut in Limbo.” The Durango Herald, May 1, 2017. [cited July 17, 2017]. Available from https://durangoherald.com/articles/154945-state-democrats-reject-compromise-on-hospital-fee.Google Scholar
Petty, Richard E., and Cacioppo, John T.. 1984. “Source Factors and the Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion.” ACR North American Advances.Google Scholar
Petty, Richard E., and Cacioppo, John T.. 1986. “The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 19: 123–205.Google Scholar
Pew. 2011. Most Want Budget Compromise but Split on Who’s to Blame for Shutdown. Pew Research Center Publications, April 4, 2011. [cited September 21, 2017]. Available from www.pewresearch.org/2011/04/04/most-want-budget-compromise-but-split-on-whos-to-blame-for-a-shutdown/.Google Scholar
Pew. 2012. Trends in American Values: 1987–2012. The Pew Research Center for People and the Press 2012. [cited July 9, 2012]. Available from www.people-press.org/files/legacy-pdf/06-04-12%20Values%20Release.pdf.Google Scholar
Pew. 2013. Anger at Government Most Pronounced among Conservative Republicans [Report]. Pew Research Center, September 20, 2013. [cited January 26, 2018]. Available from www.people-press.org/2013/09/30/anger-at-government-most-pronounced-among-conservative-republicans/.Google Scholar
Pew. 2014a. “2014 Political Polarization and Typology Survey.” Pew Research Center. [cited April 20, 2018]. Available from www.people-press.org/2014/06/12/political-polarization-in-the-american-public/.Google Scholar
Pew. 2014b. Beyond Red vs. Blue: The Political Typology. Pew Research Center, June 26, 2014. [cited September 21, 2017]. Available from www.people-press.org/2014/06/26/the-political-typology-beyond-red-vs-blue/.Google Scholar
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rabinowitz, George, and Macdonald, Stuart Elaine. 2014. “A Directional Theory of Issue Voting.” American Political Science Review 83 (1): 93–121.Google Scholar
Ragusa, Jordan M., and Gaspar, Anthony. 2016. “Where’s the Tea Party? An Examination of the Tea Party’s Voting Behavior in the House of Representatives.” Political Research Quarterly 69 (2): 361–72.Google Scholar
Ramey, Adam. 2015. “Weighing the Alternatives: Preferences, Parties, and Constituency in Roll-Call Voting.” The Journal of Politics 77 (2): 421–32.Google Scholar
Rand, A. Barry. 2013. “The Road Forward: Social Security and Medicare” [Blog]. The Huffington Post, January 20, 2013. [cited July 27, 2016]. Available from www.huffingtonpost.com/a-barry-rand/social-security-medicare_b_2513928.html.Google Scholar
Reid, Harry. 2012. “DNC 2012: Senator Harry Reid’s Speech to the Democratic Convention.” The Washington Post, September 4, 2012. [cited August 24, 2016]. Available from www.washingtonpost.com/politics/dnc-2012-senator-harry-reids-speech-to-democratic-convention-full-speech/2012/09/04/69571634-f6f2-11e1-8253-3f495ae70650_story.html?utm_term=.ea5e8bf6f7b4.Google Scholar
Republican Platform Committee. 2016. “Republican Party Platform 2016.” Available at www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/2016-republican-party-platform.Google Scholar
Richard, Brandon. 2018. “Terri Bryant Defeats GOP Primary Challenger.” WSIL ABC, March 20, 2018. [cited March 27, 2018]. Available from www.wsiltv.com/story/37772301/terri-bryant-defeats-gop-primary-challenger.Google Scholar
Rigby, Elizabeth, and Wright, Gerald C.. 2015. “The Policy Consequences of Party Polarization: Evidence from the American States.” In American Gridlock: The Sources, Character, and Impact of Partisan Polarization, ed. Thurber, J. A. and Yoshinaka, A.. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 236–55.Google Scholar
Ritov, Ilana, and Baron, Jonathan. 1999. “Protected Values and Omission Bias.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 79 (2): 79–94.Google Scholar
Rojas, Alexandra, and Mcelwee, Sean. 2019. “A Democrats Who Votes with Trump 69% of the Time Should Be Primaried.” CNN, January 15, 2019. [cited January 25, 2019]. Available from www.cnn.com/2019/01/14/opinions/importance-of-challenging-democratic-incumbents-rojas-mcelwee/index.html.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, David E. 1986. “The Tax Reform Act of 1986: How the Measure Came Together.” The New York Times, October 23, 1986. [cited April 13, 2018]. Available from www.nytimes.com/1986/10/23/business/tax-reform-act--measure-came-together-tax-bill-for-textbooks.html?pagewanted=all.Google Scholar
Rosenbluth, Frances McCall, and Shapiro, Ian. 2018. Responsible Parties: Saving Democratic from Itself. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Alan. 2009. Engines of Democracy: Politics and Policymaking in State Legislatures. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Ryan, Timothy J. 2014. “Reconsidering Moral Issues in Politics.” The Journal of Politics 76 (2): 380–97.Google Scholar
Ryan, Timothy J. 2017. “No Compromise: Political Consequences of Moralized Attitudes.” American Journal of Political Science 61 (2): 409–23.Google Scholar
Sacramento Bee Editorial Board. 2017. “Here’s Why to Support Jerry Brown’s Cap and Trade Deal.” The Sacramento Bee, July 17, 2017. [cited January 26, 2018]. Available from www.sacbee.com/opinion/editorials/article160849844.html.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Robert J. 2013. “Ideology Is What Has Won in the Shutdown Debate.” The Washington Post, October 6, 2013. [cited June 3, 2014]. Available from www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/robert-samuelson-the-shutdown-is-a-triumph-of-ideology/2013/10/06/1bc17054-2d4c-11e3-97a3-ff2758228523_story.html.Google Scholar
Sanchez, Raf. 2014. “Tea Party Victory Dashes Barack Obama’s Lingering Hopes for a Compromise with Republicans.” The Telegraph, June 11, 2014. [cited December 7, 2015]. Available from www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/republicans/10893084/Tea-Party-victory-dashes-Barack-Obamas-lingering-hopes-for-compromise-with-Republicans.html.Google Scholar
Sax, Linda J., Gilmartin, Shannon K., and Bryant, Alyssa N.. 2003. “Assessing Response Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Web and Paper Surveys.” Research in Higher Education 44 (4): 409–32.Google Scholar
Schaffner, Brian, and Ansolabehere, Stephen. 2015. “CCES Common Content, 2014.” Harvard Dataverse, V4, UNF:6:WvvlTX+E+iNraxwbaWNVdg== [fileUNF].Google Scholar
Schaper, David. 2014. GOP Leaders: Gas Tax Hike Could Fuel Fixes to Bad Roads and Bridges. NPR.org, December 8, 2014. [cited October 12, 2016]. Available from www.npr.org/2014/12/08/369373660/gop-leaders-gas-tax-hike-could-fuel-fixes-to-bad-roads-and-bridges.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Shalom H. 1977. “Normative Influences on Altruism.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 10: 221–79.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Shalom H. 1992. “Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 21: 1–65.Google Scholar
Sernoffsky, Evan. 2017. “Protestors Shut Down Pelosi News Conference in DACA: ‘All of Us or None of Us’.” San Francisco Chronicle, September 18, 2017. [cited October 25, 2017]. Available from www.sfchronicle.com/news/article/Protesters-shut-down-Pelosi-news-conference-on-12206788.php.Google Scholar
Serrano, Jose. 2016. “The Serrano Report.” In Congressman Serrano Votes in Support of PROMESA. Washington, DC: House of Representatives Member Newsletter.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Catherine R., Brady, David W., Brody, Richard A., and Ferejohn, John A.. 1990. “Linking Constituency Opinion and Senate Voting Scores: A Hybrid Explanation.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 15 (4): 599–621.Google Scholar
Sherman, Jake. 2014. “Cantor Loses.” Politico, June 11, 2014. [cited October 12, 2016]. Available from www.politico.com/story/2014/06/eric-cantor-primary-election-results-virginia-107683.Google Scholar
Shor, Boris, and McCarty, Nolan. 2011. “The Ideological Mapping of American Legislatures.” American Political Science Review 104 (3): 530–51.Google Scholar
Siders, David, and Marinucci, Carla. 2018. “California Democrats Decline to Endorse Feinstein.” Politico, February 25, 2018. [cited March 26, 2018]. Available from www.sfgate.com/politics/article/Feinstein-answers-questions-still-gets-hard-10957888.php.Google Scholar
Sides, John, Tausanovitch, Chris, Vavreck, Lynn, and Warshaw, Christopher. 2018. “On the Representativeness of Primary Electorates.” British Journal of Political Science: 1–9 doi:10.1017/S000712341700062X.Google Scholar
Skocpol, Theda, and Williamson, Vanessa. 2012. The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Skovron, Christopher. 2018. “What Politicians Believe About Electoral Accountability.” SSRN. [cited January 8, 2019]. Available from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3309906.Google Scholar
Snyder, James M. 1992. “Artificial Extremism in Interest Group Ratings.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 17 (3): 319–45.Google Scholar
Solomon, Christopher. 2016. The Massive Land Deal That Could Change the West Forever. Outside Online, February 22, 2016. [cited March 18, 2019]. Available from www.outsideonline.com/2056806/devils-grand-bargain-rob-bishop-western-lands.Google Scholar
Spetalnick, Matt. 2015. “Obama Defends TPP Secrecy, Says Now Is Chance for Debate.” November 20, 2015. [cited September 5, 2017]. Available from www.reuters.com/article/us-trade-tpp-usa/obama-defends-tpp-secrecy-says-now-is-chance-for-debate-idUSKCN0T91GQ20151120.Google Scholar
Spielvogel, Christian. 2005. “‘You Know Where I Stand’: Moral Framing of the War on Terrorism and the Iraq War in the 2004 Presidential Campaign.” Rhetoric & Public Affairs 8 (4): 549–69.Google Scholar
Squire, Peverill. 2007. “Measuring State Legislative Professionalism: The Squire Index Revisited.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 7 (2): 211–27.Google Scholar
Squire, Peverill, and Moncrief, Gary. 2015. State Legislatures Today: Politics Under the Domes. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Stasavage, David. 2007. “Polarization and Publicity: Rethinking the Benefits of Deliberative Democracy.” The Journal of Politics 69 (1): 59–72.Google Scholar
Stone, Walter J., and Simas, Elizabeth N.. 2010. “Candidate Valence and Ideological Positions in U.S. House Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (2): 371–88.Google Scholar
Tamu, Jordan. 2011. “In Defense of the Back-Room Deal.” The New York Times, October 18, 2011. [cited January 4, 2018]. Available from www.nytimes.com/2011/10/19/opinion/secrecy-helps-committees-negotiate.html.Google Scholar
Tausanovitch, Chris, and Warshaw, Christopher. 2013. “Measuring Constituent Policy Preferences in Congress, State Legislatures, and Cities.” The Journal of Politics 75 (2): 330–42.Google Scholar
Taylor, Shelley E., and Pham, Lien B.. 1999. “The Effect of Mental Simulation on Goal-Directed Performance.” Imagination, Cognition and Personality 18 (4): 253–68.Google Scholar
Taylor, Shelley E., Pham, Lien B., Rivkin, Inna D., and Armor, David A.. 1998. “Harnessing the Imagination: Mental Simulation, Self-Regulation, and Coping.” American Psychologist 53 (4): 429–39.Google Scholar
Tetlock, Philip E. 1983. “Accountability and Complexity of Thought.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45 (1): 74–83.Google Scholar
Theriault, Sean M. 2008. Party Polarization in Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Theriault, Sean M. 2015. “The Ugly Side of Party Polarization in Congress.” In American Gridlock: The Sources, Character, and Impact of Political Polarization, ed. Thurber, J. A. and Yoshinaka, A.. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 152–70.Google Scholar
Thomsen, Danielle M. 2017. Opting Out of Congress: Partisan Polarization. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trounstine, Jessica. 2009. “All Politics Is Local: The Reemergence of the Study of City Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 7 (3): 611–18.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, George. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Vinicky, Amanda. 2017. “State Rep. Steven Andersson to Step Down.” WTTW: Chicago Tonight, August 17, 2017. [cited February 4, 2018]. Available from http://chicagotonight.wttw.com/2017/08/17/state-rep-steven-andersson-step-down.Google Scholar
Vogel, Kennth P., and Smith, Ben. 2011. “Kochs’ Plan for 2012: Raise $88M.” Politico, February 11, 2012. [cited March 25, 2019]. Available from www.politico.com/story/2011/02/kochs-plan-for-2012-raise-88m-049303.Google Scholar
Volden, Craig. 1998. “Sophisticated Voting in Supermajoritarian Settings.” The Journal of Politics 60 (1): 149–73.Google Scholar
Volden, Craig, and Wiseman, Alan E.. 2007. “Bargaining in Legislatures over Particularistic and Collective Goods.” American Political Science Review 101 (1): 79–92.Google Scholar
Volden, Craig, and Wiseman, Alan E.. 2014. The Lawmakers: Legislative Effectiveness in the United States Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Walton, Richard E., and McKersie, Robert B.. 1965. A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations: An Analysis of a Social Interaction System. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Warren, Mark E., Mansbridge, Jane, and Cameron, Max A. with Bächtiger, André, Chambers, Simone, Ferejohn, John, Jacobs, Alan, Knight, Jack, Naurin, Daniel, Schwartzberg, Melissa, Tamir, Yael, Thompson, Dennis, and Williams, Melissa. 2016. “Deliberative Negotiation.” In Political Negotiation: A Handbook, ed. Mansbridge, J. and Martin, C. J.. Washington, DC: Brookings. pp. 141–96.Google Scholar
Washington Post Editorial Board. 2017. “California’s Cap-and-Trade Program Could Offer Other States Guidance.” The Washington Post, July 29, 2017. [cited February 4, 2018]. Available from www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/californias-cap-and-trade-program-could-offer-other-states-guidance/2017/07/28/80aadf4c-6e4c-11e7-96ab-5f38140b38cc_story.html?utm_term=.264d2973219.Google Scholar
Waxman, Henry, and with Green, Joshua. 2009. The Waxman Report: How Congress Really Works. New York: Twelve: Hachette Book Group.Google Scholar
Weisman, Jonathan, and Steinhauer, Jennifer. 2013. “Senate Women Lead in Effort to Find Accord.” The New York Times, October 14, 2013. [cited December 19, 2017]. Available from www.nytimes.com/2013/10/15/us/senate-women-lead-in-effort-to-find-accord.html?mcubz=0.Google Scholar
Welsh, Nick. 2017. “Jackson, Limon on Opposite Sides of Cap-and-Trade Vote.” The Santa Barbara Independent, July 20, 2017. [cited February 4, 2018]. Available from www.independent.com/news/2017/jul/20/jackson-limon-opposite-sides-cap-and-trade-vote/.Google Scholar
Westwood, Sean J. 2014. “When Bipartisanship Is Partisan: The Strategic Use of Bipartisanship in Congress.” Dartmouth University.Google Scholar
White, Margaret Kimbrell, and Borowsky, Sasha. 2018. “You Won’t Believe the Names the Left if Calling ‘No Labels’.” The Wall Street Journal, April 8, 2018. [cited April 13, 2018]. Available from www.wsj.com/articles/you-wont-believe-the-names-the-left-is-calling-no-labels-1523209037.Google Scholar
Wildermuth, John. 2017. “Feinstein Answers Questions; Still Gets Hard Time from Protesters.” SF Gate, February 24, 2017. [cited March 26, 2018]. Available from www.sfgate.com/politics/article/Feinstein-answers-questions-still-gets-hard-10957888.php.Google Scholar
Wilderness Connect. 2019. Wilderness Data Search. Wilderness Connect 2019. [cited March 18, 2019]. Available from www.wilderness.net/NWPS/advSearch.Google Scholar
Wildlife Management Institute. 2011. “House and Senate Square Off on Federal Budget.” [cited October 25, 2017]. Available from www.wildlifemanagementinstitute.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=516:house-and-senate-square-off-on-federal-budget&catid=34:ONB%20Articles&Itemid=54.Google Scholar
Willon, Phil. 2017. “California Tea Party Conservatives Take Shots at GOP Establishment, Sounding Downright Progressive.” Los Angeles Times, August 11, 2017. [cited February 4, 2018]. Available from www.latimes.com/politics/essential/la-pol-ca-essential-politics-updates-california-tea-party-takes-shots-at-gop-1502494930-htmlstory.html.Google Scholar
Wolak, Jennifer. 2013. “Congressional Decision-Making and Public Support for Compromise.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. Chicago.Google Scholar
Wolak, Jennifer. 2017a. “Public Expectations of State Legislators.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 42 (2): 175–209.Google Scholar
Wolak, Jennifer. 2017b. “Support for Compromise in Principle and in Practice.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. San Francisco.Google Scholar
Workman, Samuel, Jones, Bryan D., and Jochim, Ashley E.. 2009. “Information Processing and Policy Dynamics.” Policy Studies Journal 37 (1): 75–92.Google Scholar
Wyant, Sara. 2017. Lesson #1: Every Farm Bill Is Unique – The Last One Was a Doozy. AgriPulse, February 2, 2017. [cited December 19, 2017]. Available from www.agri-pulse.com/articles/8894-lesson-1-every-farm-bill-is-unique-the-last-one-was-a-doozy.Google Scholar
Zapler, Mike. 2012. “Lugar Unloads on ‘Unrelenting’ Partisanship.” Politico, May 9, 2012. [cited July 3, 2012]. Available from www.politico.com/blogs/on-congress/2012/05/lugar-unloads-on-unrelenting-partisanship-122891.Google Scholar
Zartman, I. William, and Berman, Maureen R.. 1982. The Practical Negotiator. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Zornick, George. 2014. Elizabeth Warren Reveals Inside Details of Trade Talks. The Nation, May 15, 2014. [cited September 5, 2017]. Available from www.thenation.com/article/elizabeth-warren-reveals-inside-details-trade-talks/.Google Scholar