Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T20:23:36.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography of Secondary Sources

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2017

John Baker
John Baker
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Reinvention of Magna Carta 1216–1616 , pp. 534 - 541
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography of Secondary Sources

Alsop, J. D., ‘William Fleetwood and English Historical Scholarship’ (1994) 25 Sixteenth-Century Journal 155–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axton, M., The Queen’s Two Bodies: Drama and the Elizabethan Succession (1977).Google Scholar
Baker, J. H., Catalogue of English Legal Manuscripts in Cambridge University Library (Woodbridge, 1996).Google Scholar
Baker, J. H., Readers and Readings in the Inns of Court and Chancery (13 SS Suppl. Series, 2000).Google Scholar
Baker, J. H., The Law’s Two Bodies (Oxford, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, J. H., Oxford History of the Laws of England, vi (1483–1558) (Oxford, 2003).Google Scholar
Baker, J. H., The Men of Court 1440–1550: A Prosopography of the Inns of Court and Chancery and the Courts of Law (18 SS Suppl. Series, 2012), two volumes.Google Scholar
Baker, J. H., Collected Papers on English Legal History (Cambridge, 2013), three volumes.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, J. H., ‘The Legal Force and Effect of Magna Carta’, in Magna Carta: Muse & Mentor, ed. Holland, R. J. (Library of Congress [Washington, DC], 2014), pp. 65–84, (notes) 258–61.Google Scholar
Baker, J. H., ed., The Reports of Sir John Spelman (93–94 SS, 1977–8), two volumes.Google Scholar
Baker, J. H., Reports from the Lost Notebooks of Sir James Dyer, i (109–10 SS, 1994–95), two volumes.Google Scholar
Baker, J. H., Selected Readings and Commentaries on Magna Carta 1400–1604 (132 SS, 2015).Google Scholar
Barnes, T. G., ‘The Prerogative and Environmental Control of London Building in the Early Seventeenth Century’ (1970) 58 California Law Review 1332–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, T. G., ‘A Cheshire Seductress, Precedent, and a “Sore Blow” to Star Chamber’ in On the Laws and Customs of England: Essays in Honor of Samuel E. Thorne, ed. Arnold, M. S. and others (Chapel Hill, 1981), pp. 359–82.Google Scholar
Bémont, C., ed., Chartes des Libertés Anglaises (Paris, 1892).Google Scholar
Bindoff, S. T., ed., The History of Parliament: The House of Commons 1509–1558 (1982), three volumes.Google Scholar
Birdsall, P., ‘“Non Obstante”: A Study of the Dispensing Power of the English Kings’ in Essays in History and Politics in Honor of C. H. McIlwain (Cambridge, MA, 1936), pp. 37–76.Google Scholar
Blackstone, W., The Great Charter (Oxford, 1759).Google Scholar
Boyer, A. D., Sir Edward Coke and the Elizabethan Age (Stanford, CA, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, C. W., Pettifoggers and Vipers of the Commonwealth: The ‘Lower Branch’ of the Legal Profession in Early Modern England (Cambridge, 1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, C. W., ‘The Place of Magna Carta and the Ancient Constitution in Sixteenth-Century English Legal Thought’ (1993) in Roots of Liberty, ed. Sandoz (q.v.), pp. 74–114.Google Scholar
Brooks, C. W., Law, Politics and Society in Early Modern England (Cambridge, 2008).Google Scholar
Brooks, C. W., ‘A Puritan Collaboration in Defence of the Liberty of the Subject: James Morice, Robert Beale and the Elizabethan Campaign against Ecclesiastical Authority’ in Collaboration and Interdiscipliniarity in the Republic of Letters, ed. Scott, P. (Manchester, 2011), pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Burgess, G., ‘Common Law and Political Theory in Early Stuart England’ (1988) 40 Political Science 4–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, G., Politics of the Ancient Constitution 1603–42 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, G., Absolute Monarchy and the Stuart Constitution (New Haven, CT, 1996).Google Scholar
Butterfield, H., Magna Carta in the Historiography of the 16th and 17th Centuries (1969).Google Scholar
Cam, H. M., Magna Carta: Event or Document? (SS lecture, 1965).Google Scholar
Carpenter, D., Magna Carta (2015).Google Scholar
Chrimes, S. B., ‘The Constitutional Ideas of Dr Cowell’ (1949) 64 EHR 461–87.Google Scholar
Chrimes, S. B, ‘Richard II’s Questions to the Judges’ (1956) 72 LQR 365–90.Google Scholar
Christianson, P., ‘Young John Selden and the Ancient Constitution c. 1610–18’ (1984) 128 Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 271–315.Google Scholar
Christianson, P., ‘Royal and Parliamentary Voices on the Ancient Constitution 1604–21’ (1991) in The Mental World of the Jacobean Court, ed. Peck (q.v.), pp. 71–95.Google Scholar
Christianson, P., ‘Ancient Constitutions in the Age of Sir Edward Coke and John Selden’ (1993) in Roots of Liberty, ed. Sandoz (q.v.), pp. 115–84.Google Scholar
Cockburn, J. S., A History of English Assizes 1558–1714 (Cambridge, 1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collinson, P., The Elizabethan Puritan Movement (1967).Google Scholar
Collinson, P., Richard Bancroft and Elizabethan Anti-Puritanism (Cambridge, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cope, E. S., ‘Sir Edward Coke and Proclamations 1610’ (1971) 15 American Journal of Legal History 215–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corré, J. I., ‘The Argument, Decision and Reports of Darcy v. Allen’ (1996) 45 Emory Law Journal 1261–1327.Google Scholar
Corwin, E. S., ‘The Doctrine of Due Process before the Civil War’ (1911) 24 Harvard Law Review 366–85, 460–79.Google Scholar
Croft, P., ‘Fresh Light on Bate’s Case’ (1987) 30 Historical Journal 523–39.Google Scholar
Cromartie, A., The Constitutinalist Revolution: An Essay on the History of England 1450–1642 (Cambridge, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, D. S., ‘Further Light on the Case of Monopolies’ (1932) 48 LQR 394–414.Google Scholar
Dawson, J. P., ‘Coke and Ellesmere Disinterred: The Attack on the Chancery in 1616’ (1941) 36 Illinois Law Review 127–52.Google Scholar
Dawson, J. P., ‘The Privy Council and Private Law in the Tudor and Stuart Period’ (1950) 48 Michigan Law Review 393–428, 627–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrett, J. D. M., ‘The Trial of Sir Thomas More’ (1964) 79 EHR 449–77.Google Scholar
Dietz, F. C., English Government Finance 1485–1558 (2nd edn, 1964).Google Scholar
Donald, M. B., Elizabethan Monopolies (Edinburgh, 1961).Google Scholar
Dunham, W. H., ‘Regal Power and the Rule of Law: A Tudor Paradox’ (1964) 3 Journal of British Studies 24–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunham, W. H., ‘Magna Carta & British Constitutionalism’ in The Great Charter: Four Essays on Magna Carta and the History of our Liberty (New York, 1965), pp. 26–50.Google Scholar
Edie, C. A., ‘Tactics and Strategies: Parliament’s Attack on the Royal Dispensing Power 1597–1689’ (1985) 29 American Journal of Legal History 197–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elton, G. R., Studies in Tudor and Stuart Politics and Government (Cambridge, 1974–92).Google Scholar
Elton, G. R., The Tudor Constitution (2nd edn, 1982).Google Scholar
Elton, G. R., The Parliament of England 1559–81 (Cambridge, 1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, J. J., ‘Francis Bacon and the Challenge to the Prerogative in 1610’ (1969) 2 Journal of Historical Studies 272–82.Google Scholar
Forrest, I., The Detection of Heresy in Late Medieval England (Oxford, 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fussner, F. S., ed., ‘William Camden’s “Discourse concerning the Prerogative of the King” [c. 1615]’ (1957) 101 Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 204–15.Google Scholar
Garnett, G., ‘“The Ould Fields”: Law and History in the Prefaces to Sir Edward Coke’s Reports’ (2013) 34 Journal of Legal History 245–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsworthy, J., The Sovereignty of Parliament: History and Philosophy (Oxford, 1999).Google Scholar
Gough, J. W., Fundamental Law in English Constitutional History (Oxford, 1955).Google Scholar
Gray, C. [M.], ‘Reason, Authority, and Imagination: The Jurisprudence of Sir Edward Coke’ in Culture and Politics from Puritanism to the Enlightenment, ed. Zagorin, P. (Berkeley, 1980), pp. 25–66.Google Scholar
Gray, C. [M.], The Writ of Prohibition: Jurisdiction in Early Modern English Law (New York, 1994), two volumes.Google Scholar
Gray, C. [M.], ‘Self-Incrimination in Interjurisdictional Law’ in The Privilege against Self-Incrimination, ed. Helmholz, R. H. and others (Chicago, 1997), pp. 47–81.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J., The Radical Face of the Ancient Constitution: St Edward’s ‘Laws’ in Early Modern Political Thought (Cambridge, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith-Jones, R., and Hill, M., eds., Magna Carta, Religion and the Rule of Law (Cambridge, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guy, J. A., The Public Career of Sir Thomas More (Brighton, 1980).Google Scholar
Guy, J. A., ed., The Debellation of Salem and Bizance (10 Complete Works of St Thomas More, New Haven, CT, 1987).Google Scholar
Guy, J. A., ed., The Reign of Elizabeth I (Cambridge, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, G. D. G., ‘Impositions and the Courts 1554–1606’ (1953) 69 LQR 200–18.Google Scholar
Halliday, P., Habeas Corpus: From England to Empire (Cambridge, MA, 2010).Google Scholar
Harris, R., ‘William Fleetwood, Recorder of the City, and Catholicism in Elizabethan London’ (1963) 7 Recusant History 106–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, J. S., The Rule of Law 1603–1660: Crowns, Courts and Judges (2003).Google Scholar
Hasler, P. W., ed., The History of Parliament: The House of Commons 1558–1603 (1981), three volumes.Google Scholar
Heinze, R. W., ‘Proclamations and Parliamentary Protest 1539–1610’ in Tudor Rule and Revolution, ed. Guth, D. J. and McKenna, J. W. (Cambridge, 1982), pp. 237–59.Google Scholar
Helmholz, R. H., ‘Bonham’s Case, Judicial Review, and the Law of Nature’ (2009) 1 Journal of Legal Analysis 324–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, E. G., Foundations of English Administrative Law (Cambridge, MA, 1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, J. C., ‘The Origins of the Constitutional Tradition in England’ in Magna Carta and Medieval Government, ed. J. C. Holt (1985), pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
Holt, J. C, Magna Carta, 3rd edn by Garnett, G. and Hudson, J. (Cambridge, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulme, E. W., ‘The Early History of the English Patent System’ in Select Essays in Anglo-American Legal History (Boston, MA, 1909), iii. 117–48.Google Scholar
Ibbetson, D., ‘The Earl of Oxford’s Case (1615)’ in Landmark Cases in Equity, ed. Mitchell, C. and Mitchell, P. (Oxford 2012), pp. 1–32.Google Scholar
Jenks, E., ‘The Myth of Magna Carta’ (1905) 4 Independent Review 260–73.Google Scholar
Jones, W. J., The Elizabethan Court of Chancery (Oxford, 1967).Google Scholar
Keir, D. L., ‘The Case of Ship Money’ (1936) 52 LQR 546–74.Google Scholar
Kelly, H. A., ‘Inquisition and the Prosecution of Heresy: Misconceptions and Abuses’ (1989) 58 Church History 439–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, H. A., Inquisitions and other Trial Procedures in the Medieval West (Aldershot, 2001).Google Scholar
Kelly, H. A., with Karlin, L. W. and Wegemer, G. B., eds., Thomas More’s Trial by Jury (Woodbridge, 2011).Google Scholar
Kitching, C. J., ‘The Quest for Concealed Lands in the Reign of Elizabeth I’ (1974) 5 Transactions of the Royal Historical Society (5th series) 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klinck, D. R., Conscience, Equity and the Court of Chancery in Early Modern England (Farnham, 2013).Google Scholar
Knafla, L. A., Law and Politics in Jacobean England: the Tracts of Lord Chancellor Ellesmere (Cambridge, 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langbein, J. H., Torture and the Law of Proof (Chicago, 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levack, B. P., The Civil Lawyers in England 1603–1641: A Political Study (Oxford, 1973).Google Scholar
Levack, B. P., ‘English Law, Scots Law and the Union 1603–1707’ in Law-Making and Law-Makers in British History, ed. A. Harding (1980), 105–26.Google Scholar
Levack, B. P., ‘Law, Sovereignty and the Union’ in Scots and Britons: British Political Thought and the Union of 1603, ed. Mason, R. A. (Cambridge, 1994), pp. 213–37.Google Scholar
Lewis, A. H., A Study of Elizabethan Ship Money (Philadelphia, 1928).Google Scholar
Lidington, D. R., ‘The Enforcement of the Penal Statutes at the Court of Exchequer c. 1558-c. 1571’ (unpublished Cambridge PhD dissertation, 1988).Google Scholar
Loach, J., Parliament and the Crown in the Reign of Mary Tudor (1986).Google Scholar
Loach, J., Parliament under the Tudors (Oxford, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lobban, M., A History of the Philosophy of Law in the Common Law World, 1600–1900 (Dordrecht, 2007).Google Scholar
McGlynn, M., The Royal Prerogative and the Learning of the Inns of Court (Cambridge, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGlynn, M., ‘From Charter to Common Law: the Rights and Liberties of the Pre-Reformation Church’ in Magna Carta, Religion and the Rule of Law, ed. Griffith-Jones, R. and Hill, M. (Cambridge, 2015), pp. 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGlynn, M., ed., The Rights and Liberties of the English Church: Readings from the Pre-Reformation Inns of Court (129 SS, 2015).Google Scholar
McIlwain, C. H., The High Court of Parliament and its Supremacy (New Haven, 1910).Google Scholar
McIlwain, C. H., ‘Due process of Law in Magna Carta’ (1914) 14 Columbia Law Review 27–51; reprinted in Constitutionalism and the Changing World: Collected Papers (Cambridge, 1939), pp. 86–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIlwain, C. H., ‘Magna Carta and Common Law’ (1917), in Malden, ed., Magna Carta Commemoration Essays (q.v.), pp. 122–79; reprinted in Constitutionalism and the Changing World: Collected Papers (Cambridge, 1939), pp. 127–77.Google Scholar
McIlwain, C. H., ed., Political Works of James I (Cambridge, MA, 1918).Google Scholar
McKechnie, W. S., Magna Carta: A Commentary on the Great Charter of King John (Glasgow, 1906; 2nd edn, 1914).Google Scholar
Maguire, M., ‘Attack of the Common Lawyers on the Oath Ex Officio’ in Essays in History and Political Theory in Honour of C. H. McIlwain, ed. Wittke, C. (Cambridge, MA, 1936), pp. 199–229.Google Scholar
Malament, B., ‘The “Economic Liberalism” of Sir Edward Coke’ (1967) 76 Yale Law Journal 1321–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malden, H. E., ed., Magna Carta Commemoration Essays (1917).Google Scholar
Matthew, H. C. G., and Harrison, B., eds., Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (Oxford, 2004), 61 volumes.Google Scholar
Moore, D., ‘Recorder Fleetwood and the Tudor Queenship Controversy’ in Ambiguous Realities: Women in the Middle Ages and Renaissance, ed. Levin, C. and Watson, J. C. (Detroit, 1987), pp. 235–51.Google Scholar
Moore, D., and Beem, C., eds., The Name of a Queen: William Fleetwood’s Itinerarium ad Windsor (New York, 2013).Google Scholar
Musson, A., Medieval Law in Context: The Growth of Legal Consciousness from Magna Carta to the Peasants’ Revolt (Manchester, 2001).Google Scholar
Musson, A., ‘Magna Carta in the Later Middle Ages’ in Magna Carta: The Foundation of Freedom, ed. N. Vincent [2015].Google Scholar
Neale, J. E., Elizabeth I and her Parliaments 1559–81 (1952).Google Scholar
Neale, J. E., Elizabeth I and her Parliaments 1584–1601 (1957).Google Scholar
Oakley, D., ‘English Heresy Procedures in Thomas More’s Dialogue concerning Heresies’ (2008) 3 Thomas More Studies 70–80.Google Scholar
Oakley, F., ‘Jacobean Political Theology: The Absolute and Ordinary Powers of the King’ (1968) 29 Journal of the History of Ideas 323–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peck, L. L., ed., The Mental World of the Jacobean Court (Cambridge, 1991).Google Scholar
Pila, J., ‘The Common Law Monopoly in its Original Form’ (2001) 3 Intellectual Property Quarterly 209–24.Google Scholar
Plucknett, T. F. T., Statutes and their Interpretation in the First Half of the Fourteenth Century (Cambridge, 1922).Google Scholar
Plucknett, T. F. T., ‘The Origin of Impeachment’ (1942) 24 Transactions of the Royal Historical Society (4th series) 47–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plucknett, T. F. T., ‘Ellesmere on Statutes’ (1944) 60 LQR 242–9.Google Scholar
Plucknett, T. F. T., ‘The Impeachments of 1376’ (1951) 1 Transactions of the Royal Historical Society (5th series) 153–64, reprinted in Studies in English Legal History (1983), ch. 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plucknett, T. F. T., Concise History of the Common Law (5th edn, 1956).Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A., The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law (1957; reissued, with a retrospective essay, Cambridge, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, F., and Maitland, F. W., History of English Law before the Time of Edward I (2nd edn, Cambridge, 1898).Google Scholar
Pound, R., The Development of Constitutional Guarantees of Liberty (New Haven, 1957).Google Scholar
Powell, D. X., ‘Why did James Whitelocke go to Jail in 1613?’ (1995) 11 Australian Journal of Law and Society 169–90.Google Scholar
Powell, D. X., Sir James Whitelocke’s Liber Famelicus 1570–1632 (Bern, 2000).Google Scholar
Powicke, F. M., ‘Per Judicium Parium vel Per Legem Terrae’ (1917) in Malden ed., Magna Carta Commemoration Essays (q.v.), pp. 96–121.Google Scholar
Prest, W. R., The Rise of the Barristers (Oxford, 1986).Google Scholar
Prichard, M. J. and Yale, D. E. C., Hale and Fleetwood on Admiralty Jurisdiction (108 SS, 1993).Google Scholar
Putnam, B. H., Early Treatises on Justices of the Peace in the Fifteenth and Sixteenth Centuries (Oxford, 1924).Google Scholar
Radin, M., ‘The Myth of Magna Carta’ (1947) 60 Harvard Law Review 1060–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, R. R., The King’s Council in the North (1921).Google Scholar
Rex, R., ‘Thomas More and the Heretics: Statesman or Fanatic?’ in Logan, G. ed., The Cambridge Companion to Thomas More (Cambridge, 2011), pp. 93–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, S., ‘Magna Carta 1297 and the Uses of Literacy’ (1989) 62 Historical Research 233–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, D. H., ‘The Countervailing of Benefits: Monopoly, Liberty and Benevolence in Elizabethan England’ in Tudor Political Culture, ed. Hoak, D. (Cambridge, 1995), pp. 272–91.Google Scholar
Sandoz, E., ed., The Roots of Liberty: Magna Carta, Ancient Constitution, and the Anglo-American Tradition of Rule of Law (1993).Google Scholar
Shagan, E. H., ‘The English Inquisition: Constitutional Conflict and Ecclesiastical Law in the 1590s’ (2004) 47 Historical Journal 541–65.Google Scholar
Smith, D. C., ‘Was there a Rule in Shelley’s Case?’ (2009) 30 Journal of Legal History 53–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, D. C., ‘Remembering Usurpation: The Common Lawyers, Reformation Narratives and the Prerogative’ (2013) 86 Historical Research 619–37.Google Scholar
Smith, D. C., Sir Edward Coke and the Reformation of the Laws: Religion, Politics and Jurisprudence 1579–1616 (Cambridge, 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sommerville, J. P., ‘James I and the Divine Right of Kings’ in The Mental World of the Jacobean Court, ed. Peck, L. L. (Cambridge, 1991), pp. 55–70.Google Scholar
Sommerville, J. P., Royalists and Patriots: Politics and Ideology in England 1603–1640 (2nd edn, Harlow, 1999).Google Scholar
Stenton, D. M., After Runnymede: Magna Carta in the Middle Ages (Charlottesville, 1965).Google Scholar
Tatnall, E., ‘John Wyclif and Ecclesia Anglicana’ (1969) 20 Journal of Ecclesiastical History 19–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, G. W., ‘James I, Equity and Lord Keeper Williams’ (1976) 91 EHR 506–28.Google Scholar
Thompson, F., ‘Parliamentary Confirmations of the Great Charter’ (1933) 38 American Historical Review 659–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, F., Magna Carta: Its Role in the Making of the English Constitution 1300–1629 (Minneapolis, 1948).Google Scholar
Thomson, J. A. F., The Later Lollards 1414–1520 (Oxford, 1965).Google Scholar
Thorne, S. E., ‘Praemunire and Sir Edward Coke’ (1938) 2 Huntington Library Quarterly 85–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorne, S. E., ed., A Discourse upon the Exposicion & Understandinge of Statutes With Sir Thomas Egerton’s Additions: Edited from Manuscripts in the Huntington Library (San Marino, California, 1942).Google Scholar
Thorne, S. E., ed., Readings and Moots at the Inns of Court in the Fifteenth Century, vol.i: Readings (71 SS, 1954).Google Scholar
Thrush, A. and Ferris, J., eds., The History of Parliament: The House of Commons 1604–1629 (2010), four volumes.Google Scholar
Tittler, R., The Reformation and the Towns in England: Politics and Political Culture c. 1540–1640 (Oxford, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, R. V., Magna Carta through the Ages (Harlow, 2003).Google Scholar
Tyacke, T., The English Revolution c. 1590–1720: Politics, Religion and Communities (Manchester, 2007), 15–16.Google Scholar
Usher, R. G., ‘James I and Sir Edward Coke’ (1903) 18 EHR 664–75.Google Scholar
Usher, R. G., ‘Nicholas Fuller: a Forgotten Exponent of English Liberty’ (1906–7) 12 American Historical Review 743–60.Google Scholar
Usher, R. G., The Reconstruction of the English Church (1910; reprinted in facsimile, Farnborough, 1969), two volumes.Google Scholar
Usher, R. G., The Rise and Fall of the High Commission (Oxford, 1913).Google Scholar
Vincent, N., Magna Carta: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, D. O., ‘Coke and the Rise of Economic Liberalism’ (1935) 6 Economic History Review 30–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, A. B., ‘The Name Magna Carta’ (1915) 30 EHR 472–5.Google Scholar
Williams, I., ‘Dr Bonham’s Case and “Void” Statutes’ (2006) 27 Journal of Legal History 111–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, I., ‘The Tudor Genesis of Edward Coke’s Immemorial Common Law’ (2010) 43 Sixteenth Century Journal 103–23.Google Scholar
Williams, I., review of Kelly, H. A. and others, Sir Thomas More’s Trial by Jury (2011) 33 Journal of Legal History 123–6.Google Scholar
Williams, P., The Council in the Marches of Wales under Elizabeth I (Cardiff, 1958).Google Scholar
Woodworth, A., Purveyance for the Royal Household in the Reign of Elizabeth (Philadelphia, 1945).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, S., ‘Nicholas Fuller and the Liberties of the Subject’ (2006) 25 Parliamentary History 176–213.Google Scholar
Youngs, F. A., Proclamations of the Tudor Queens (Cambridge, 1976).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×