References

Jaime Lindsey

doi:10.1017/9781108993203.010

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 September 2022

Jaime Lindsey

Show author details

Jaime Lindsey: Affiliation:
University of Essex

Book contents

Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Type: Chapter
Information: Reimagining the Court of Protection
Access to Justice in Mental Capacity Law
, pp. 227 - 240

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108993203.010 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aitken, M., Cunningham-Burley, S. and Pagliari, C. ‘Moving from trust to trustworthiness: experiences of public engagement in the Scottish Health Informatics Programme’ (2016) 43 Science and Public Policy 713.Google Scholar

Allan Lind, E., Kanfer, R. and Early, C. ‘Voice, control and procedural justice’ (1990) 59 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 952.Google Scholar

American Bar Association. Report of the Taskforce on Research on Mediator Techniques (2017), www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/dispute_resolution/materials/2019-mediation-research-task-force-report.pdf.Google Scholar

Anderson, J. ‘Autonomy and vulnerability entwined’ in Mackenzie, C., Rogers, W. and Dodds, S. (eds.), Vulnerability: New Essays in Ethics and Feminist Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Arstein-Kerslake, A. Restoring Voice to People with Cognitive Disabilities: Realizing the Right to Equal Recognition before the Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Avraham, R. Hubbard, W. H. J. and Lipschits, I. ‘Procedural flexibility in three dimensions’, Coase–Sandor Working Paper Series in Law and Economics, No. 843 (2018).CrossRef Google Scholar

Baggs, A. M. ‘In my language’ (2007), www.youtube.com/watch?v=JnylM1hI2jc.Google Scholar

Banakar, R. and Travers, M. ‘Law, sociology and method’ in Banakar, R. and Travers, M. (eds.), Theory and Method in Socio-Legal Research (Oxford: Hart, 2005).Google Scholar

Banks, L. M., Davey, C., Shakespeare, T. and Kuper, H. ‘Disability-inclusive responses to COVID-19: lessons learnt from research on social protection in low- and middle-income countries’ (2021) 137 World Development 105178.Google Scholar

Banner, N. F. ‘Unreasonable reasons: normative judgements in the assessment of mental capacity’ (2012) 18 Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 1038.Google Scholar

Barad, K. ‘Posthumanist performativity: toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter’ (2003) 28 Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 801.Google Scholar

Barnes, C. ‘An ethical agenda in disability research: rhetoric or reality?’ in Mertens, D. M. and Ginsberg, P. E. (eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (London: Sage, 2008).Google Scholar

Barry, L. ‘Elder mediation: what’s in a name?’ (2015) 32 Conflict Resolution Quarterly 435.Google Scholar

Bens, J. ‘The courtroom as an affective arrangement: analysing atmospheres in courtroom ethnography’ (2018) 50 Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 336.Google Scholar

Berger-Walliser, G., Barton, T. D. and Haapio, H. ‘From visualization to legal design: a collaborative and creative process’ (2017) 54 American Business Law Journal 347.CrossRef Google Scholar

Blader, S. L. and Tyler, T. ‘A four-component model of procedural justice: defining the meaning of a “fair” process’ (2003) 29 Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 747.Google Scholar

Blakey, R. ‘Cracking the code: the role of mediators and flexibility post-LASPO’ (2020) 32 Child and Family Law Quarterly 53.Google Scholar

Bondy, V., Mulcahy, L., Doyle, M. and Reid, V. (2009) ‘Mediation and judicial review: an empirical research study’ (London: The Public Law Project), www.nuffieldfoundation.org/sites/default/files/files/MediationandJudicialReview.pdf.Google Scholar

Brammer, A. and Cooper, P. ‘Still waiting for a meeting of minds: child witnesses in the criminal and family justice systems’ (2011) 12 Criminal Law Review 925.Google Scholar

Brazier, M. and Miola, J. ‘Bye-bye Bolam: a medical litigation revolution?’ (2000) 8 Medical Law Review 85.Google Scholar

Breden, T. M. and Vollmann, J. ‘The cognitive based approach of capacity assessment in psychiatry: a philosophical critique of the MacCAT-T’ (2004) 12 Health Care Analysis 273.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Burchell, K. ‘Empiricist selves and contingent “others”: the performative function of the discourse of scientists working in conditions of controversy’ (2007) 16 Public Understanding of Science 145.Google Scholar

Burton, M., Evans, R. and Sanders, A. ‘Vulnerable and intimidated witnesses and the adversarial process in England and Wales’ (2007) 11 International Journal of Evidence and Proof 1.Google Scholar

Butler, -Cole, V. and Hobey-Hamsher, L. ‘The assessment of capacity by judges of the Court of Protection’ (2016) 6 Elder Law Journal 145.Google Scholar

Byrom, N. ‘Measuring success in online courts: an empirical challenge’ (October 2018), https://research.thelegaleducationfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Measuring-Success-in-Online-Courts-Briefing-Paper.pdf.Google Scholar

Byrom, N. ‘Digital justice: HMCTS data strategy and delivering access to justice’ (October 2019), https://research.thelegaleducationfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/DigitalJusticeFINAL.pdf.Google Scholar

Carney, T. and Tait, D. The Adult Guardianship Experiment: Tribunals and Popular Justice (Sydney: Federation Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Case, P. ‘Dangerous liaisons? Psychiatry and law in the Court of Protection – expert discourses of “insight” (and “compliance”)’ (2016) 24 Medical Law Review 360.CrossRef Google Scholar

Case, P. ‘Negotiating the domain of mental capacity: clinical judgement or judicial diagnosis?’ (2016) 16 Medical Law International 174.Google Scholar

Case, P. ‘When the judge met P: the rules of engagement in the Court of Protection and the parallel universe of children meeting judges in the Family Court’ (2019) 39 Legal Studies 302.CrossRef Google Scholar

Cermele, J. A., Daniels, S. and Anderson, K. L. ‘Defining normal: constructions of race and gender in the DSM-IV Casebook’ (2001) 11 Feminism & Psychology 229.Google Scholar

Charles, Mr Justice. ‘Facilitating participation of “P” and vulnerable persons in Court of Protection Proceedings’ (2016), www.familylaw.co.uk/system/froala_assets/documents/1334/Practice_Guidance_Vulnerable_Persons.pdf.Google Scholar

Clough, B. ‘Vulnerability and capacity to consent to sex: asking the right questions?’ (2014) 26 Child and Family Law Quarterly 371.Google Scholar

Clough, B. ‘“People like that”: realising the social model in mental capacity jurisprudence’ (2015) 23 Medical Law Review 53.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Clough, B. ‘Disability and vulnerability: challenging the capacity/incapacity binary’ (2017) 16 Social Policy and Society 469.Google Scholar

Clough, B. ‘New legal landscapes: (re)constructing the boundaries of mental capacity law’ (2018) 26 Medical Law Review 246–275.Google Scholar

Coggon, J. and Miola, J. ‘Autonomy, liberty, and medical decision-making’ (2011) 70 Cambridge Law Journal 523.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Collins, H. and Evans, R. ‘The third wave of science studies: studies of expertise and experience’ (2002) 32 Social Studies of Science 235.CrossRef Google Scholar

Collins, H. and Evans, R. Rethinking expertise (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Cooper, P. and Wurtzel, D. ‘A day late and a dollar short: in search of an intermediary scheme for vulnerable defendants in England and Wales’ (2013) 1 Criminal Law Review 4.Google Scholar

Crampton, A. ‘Escape from the laboratory: ethnographic methods in the study of elder and family court mediation’ (2016) 32 Negotiation Journal 191.Google Scholar

Cunningham-Hill, S. and Elder, K. Civil Litigation 2019–20 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019).Google Scholar

David, A. and Ariyo, K. ‘Insight is a useful construct in clinical assessments if used wisely’ (2021) 47 Journal of Medical Ethics 185.Google Scholar

De Girolamo, D. ‘The mediation process: challenges to neutrality and the delivery of procedural justice’ (2019) 39 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 834.Google Scholar

Delgado, R., Dunn, C., Brown, P. and Lee, H. ‘Fairness and formality: minimizing the risk of prejudice in alternative dispute resolution’ (1985) 1985 Wisconsin Law Review 1359.Google Scholar

Dennis, D. and Monahan, J. (eds.). Coercion and Aggressive Community Treatment: A New Frontier in Mental Health Law (New York: Plenum Press, 1996).CrossRef Google Scholar

Devaney, S. and Holm, S. ‘The transmutation of deference in medicine: an ethico-legal perspective’ (2018) 26 Medical Law Review 202.CrossRef Google Scholar

Donnelly, M. ‘Best interests, patient participation and the Mental Capacity Act 2005’ (2009) 17 Medical Law Review 1.Google Scholar

Donnelly, M. ‘Capacity assessment under the Mental Capacity Act 2005: delivering on the functional approach?’ (2009) 29 Legal Studies 464.Google Scholar

Donnelly, M. Healthcare Decision-Making and the Law: Autonomy, Capacity and the Limits of Liberalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Donnelly, M. ‘Best interests in the Mental Capacity Act: time to say goodbye?’ (2016) 24 Medical Law Review 318.Google Scholar

Donnelly, M. and Kilkelly, U. ‘Child-friendly healthcare: delivering on the right to be heard’ (2011) 19 Medical Law Review 27.Google Scholar

Douglas, K. and Hurley, J. ‘The potential of procedural justice in mediation: a study into mediators understandings’ (2017) 29 Bond Law Review 69 . Google Scholar

Dwyer, D. The Judicial Assessment of Expert Evidence (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Edmond, G. ‘After objectivity: expert evidence and procedural reform’ (2003) 25 Sydney Law Review 131.Google Scholar

Eisenstein, Z. The Female Body and the Law (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988).Google Scholar

Fabre, C. Whose Body Is It Anyway? Justice and the Integrity of the Person (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Fairclough, S. ‘“It doesn’t happen … and I’ve never thought it was necessary for it to happen”: barriers to vulnerable defendants giving evidence by live link in Crown Court trials’ (2017) 21 International Journal of Evidence and Proof 209.Google Scholar

Fallon-Kund, M., Coenen, M. and Bickenbach, J. E. ‘Balancing autonomy and protection: a qualitative analysis of court hearings dealing with protective measures’ (2017) 53 International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 69.Google Scholar

Fineman, M. ‘The vulnerable subject and the responsive state’ (2010) 60 Emory Law Journal 251.Google Scholar

Fletcher, R., Fox, M. and McCandless, J. ‘Legal embodiment: analysing the body of healthcare law’ (2008) 16 Medical Law Review 321.Google Scholar

Flynn, E. Disabled Justice? Access to Justice and the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (London: Routledge, 2015).Google Scholar

Flynn, E. and Arstein-Kerslake, A. ‘Legislating personhood: realising the right to support in exercising legal capacity’ (2014) 10 International Journal of Law in Context 81.CrossRef Google Scholar

Foster, C. and Miola, J. ‘Who’s in charge? The relationship between medical law, medical ethics, and medical morality?’ (2015) 23 Medical Law Review 505.Google Scholar

Foucault, M. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (London: Peregrine, 1979).Google Scholar

Fox, M. and Murphy, T. ‘The body, bodies, embodiment: feminist legal engagement with health’ in Munro, V. and Davies, M. (eds.), Ashgate Research Companion to Feminist Legal Theory (Farnham: Ashgate, 2013).Google Scholar

Fox, M. and Thomson, M. ‘Bodily integrity, embodiment, and the regulation of parental choice’ (2017) 44 Journal of Law and Society 501.Google Scholar

Fricker, M. ‘Epistemic justice as a condition of political freedom?’ (2013) 190 Synthese 1317.Google Scholar

Garland-Thomson, R. ‘Misfits: a feminist materialist disability concept’ (2011) 26 Hypatia 591.Google Scholar

Genn, H. Paths to Justice (Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1999).Google Scholar

Genn, H. ‘Civil mediation: a measured approach?’ (2010) 32 Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 195.CrossRef Google Scholar

Genn, H. Judging Civil Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Gráinne, M. ‘A ladder of legal participation for tribunal users’ (2013) Public Law 575.Google Scholar

Green, S. ‘Sarah’s story: being “P” – the importance of rule 3A’ (2016) 6 Elder Law Journal 168.Google Scholar

Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J. and Graham, W. F. ‘Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs’ (1989) 11 Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 255.Google Scholar

Hall, K. Q. ‘Feminism, disability, and embodiment’ (2002) 14 NWSA Journal vii.Google Scholar

Halliday, S. Autonomy and Pregnancy: A Comparative Analysis of Compelled Obstetric Intervention (Abingdon: Routledge, 2016).Google Scholar

Harding, R. Regulating Sexuality: Legal Consciousness in Lesbian and Gay Lives (Abingdon: Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar

Harding, R. ‘The rise of statutory wills and the limits of best interests decision‐making in inheritance’ (2015) 78 Modern Law Review 945.Google Scholar

Harding, R. ‘Safeguarding Freedom: the Liberty Protection Safeguards, Social Justice and the Rule of Law’, Current Legal Problems lecture, 4 March 2021.CrossRef Google Scholar

Harding, R. and Tascioglu, E. Everyday Decisions Project Report: Supporting Legal Capacity through Care, Support and Empowerment (2017), https://legalcapacity.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Everyday_Decisions_Project_Report.pdf.Google Scholar

Harding, R., Taşcıoğlu, E. and Furgalska, M. ‘Supported will‐making: a socio‐legal study of experiences, values and potential in supporting testamentary capacity’ (2019), www.legalcapacity.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/SupportedWillMaking_FinalReport_2019_web.pdf.Google Scholar

Harnacke, C. ‘Disability and capability: exploring the usefulness of Martha Nussbaum’s capabilities approach for the UN Disability Rights Convention’ (2013) 41 Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics 768.Google Scholar

Harrington, J. Towards a Rhetoric of Medical Law (Abingdon: Routledge, 2016).Google Scholar

Harrington, J., Series, L. and Ruck-Keene, A. ‘Law and rhetoric: critical possibilities’ (2019) 46 Journal of Law and Society 302.Google Scholar

Harris, M. ‘Anthropology and postmodernism’ in Murphy, M. F. and Margolis, M. L. (eds.), Science, Materialism and the Study of Culture (Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 1995).Google Scholar

Hayden, Mr Justice. Third COVID guidance, 23 March 2020, www.mentalcapacitylawandpolicy.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/VP-COP-Third-COVID-19-Guidance-23-March-2020.pdf.Google Scholar

Hayden, Mr Justice. Remote access to the Court of Protection guidance, 31 March 2021, www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/20200331-Court-of-Protection-Remote-Hearings.pdf.Google Scholar

Henderson, E. ‘Taking control of cross-examination: judges, advocates and intermediaries discuss judicial management of the cross-examination of vulnerable people’ (2016) 3 Criminal Law Review 181.Google Scholar

HM Courts and Tribunals Service. Reform Programme Projects explained (2018), www.gov.uk/guidance/the-hmcts-reform-programme.Google Scholar

HM Courts and Tribunals Service. Court and Tribunal Design Guide (2019), www.gov.uk/government/publications/court-and-tribunal-design-guide.Google Scholar

Herring, J. Commentary on: Sheffield City Council v E (Oxford: Hart, 2010).Google Scholar

Herring, J. and Wall, J. ‘Autonomy, capacity and vulnerable adults: filling the gaps in the Mental Capacity Act’ (2015) 35 Legal Studies 698.Google Scholar

Hildreth, J. A. D., Moore, D. A. and Blader, S. L. ‘Revisiting the instrumentality of voice: having voice in the process makes people think they will get what they want’ (2014) 27 Social Justice Research 209.Google Scholar

Hopt, K. J. and Steffek, F. (eds.). Mediation: Principles and Regulation in Comparative Perspective (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Hull, R. J. ‘Cheap listening – reflections on the concept of wrongful disability’ (2006) 20 Bioethics 55.Google Scholar

Hunter, G., Jacobson, J. and Kirby, A. Out of the Shadows: Victims’ and Witnesses’ Experiences of Attending the Crown Court (London: Victim Support, 2013).Google Scholar

Huxtable, R., Law, Ethics and Compromise at the Limits of Life (London: Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar

Hynes, J., Gill, N. and Tomlinson, J. ‘In defence of the hearing? Emerging geographies of publicness, materiality, access and communication in court hearings’ (2021) n/a Geography Compass e12499.Google Scholar

Ipsos Mori. Trust: The Truth (2019), www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/publication/documents/2019-09/ipsos-thinks-trust-the-truth.pdf.Google Scholar

Irvine, C. ‘What do “lay” people know about justice? An empirical enquiry’ (2020) 16 International Journal of Law in Context 146.Google Scholar

Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Hough, M., Myhill, A., Quinton, P. and Tyler, T. ‘Why do people comply with the law? Legitimacy and the influence of legal institutions’ (2012) 52 British Journal of Criminology 1051.Google Scholar

Jacob, M.-A. Matching Organs with Donors: Legality and Kinship in Transplants (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2012).Google Scholar

James, A. L. ‘Children, the UNCRC, and family law in England and Wales’ (2008) 46 Family Court Review 53.Google Scholar

James, A. L., James, A. and McNamee, S. ‘Turn down the volume: not hearing children in family proceedings’ (2004) 16 Child and Family Law Quarterly 189.Google Scholar

Judicial College. Equal Treatment Bench Book (2021), www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Equal-Treatment-Bench-Book-February-2021-1.pdf.Google Scholar

Kaganas, F. ‘Justifying the LASPO Act: authenticity, necessity, suitability, responsibility and autonomy’ (2017) 39 Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 168.Google Scholar

Kane, N. B., Ruck Keene, A., Owen, G. S. and Kim, S. Y. H. ‘Applying decision-making capacity criteria in practice: a content analysis of court judgments’ (2021) 16 Plos One e0246521.Google Scholar

Kant, I. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Katsh, E. and Rabinovich-Einy, O. Digital Justice: Technology and the Internet of Disputes (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Keeling, A. ‘“Organising objects”: adult safeguarding practice and article 16 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities’ (2017) 53 International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 77.Google Scholar

Kinchin, N. Administrative Justice in the UN: Procedural Protections, Gaps and Proposals for Reform (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2018).Google Scholar

Kong, C. Mental Capacity in Relationship: Decision-Making, Dialogue, and Autonomy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Kong, C., Coggon, J., Dunn, M. and Ruck Keene, A. ‘An aide memoire for a balancing act? Critiquing the “balance sheet” approach to best interests decision-making’ (2020) 28(4) Medical Law Review 753.Google Scholar

Kvale, S. and Brinkmann, S. InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing (Los Angeles: Sage 2009).Google Scholar

Langdon-Down, G. ‘Facts of life’, Law Gazette, 26 November 2018, www.lawgazette.co.uk/features/facts-of-life/5068423.article.Google Scholar

Lawson, A. ‘Accessibility obligations in the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: Nyusti & Takacs v. Hungary special issue on disability’ (2014) 30 South African Journal on Human Rights 380.Google Scholar

Lee, M. ‘Knowledge and landscape in wind energy planning’ (2017) 37 Legal Studies 3.Google Scholar

Le Sueur, A., Sunkin, M. and Murkens, J. Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Lindsey, J. ‘Developing vulnerability: a situational response to the abuse of women with mental disabilities’ (2016) 24 Feminist Legal Studies 295.Google Scholar

Lindsey, J. ‘Streamlining the approach to depriving a person of their liberty: the Re X litigation’ (2016) 38 Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 79.Google Scholar

Lindsey, J. ‘Testimonial injustice and vulnerability: a qualitative analysis of participation in the Court of Protection’ (2019) 28 Social & Legal Studies 450.Google Scholar

Lindsey, J. ‘Competing professional knowledge claims about mental capacity in the Court of Protection’ (2020) 28 Medical Law Review 1.Google Scholar

Lindsey, J. ‘Protecting vulnerable adults from abuse: under-protection and over-protection in adult safeguarding and mental capacity law’ (2020) 32 Child and Family Law Quarterly 157.Google Scholar

Lindsey, J. The Role of Mediation in the Court of Protection: A Roundtable Report (2020), http://repository.essex.ac.uk/28658/1/Mediation%20roundtable%20report_2020.pdf.Google Scholar

Lindsey, J. ‘Protecting disabled adults from abusive family relationships: mental capacity, autonomy and vulnerability’ in Clough, B. and Herring, J. (eds.), Disability, Care and Family Law (Abingdon: Routledge, 2021).Google Scholar

Lindsey, J. ‘Best interests and relationality in reproductive healthcare’ in Davey, S. and Lindsey, J. (eds.), Grandparents and the Law: Rights and Relationships (Abingdon: Routledge, in press).Google Scholar

Lindsey, J. and Loomes-Quinn, G., Evaluation of Mediation in the Court of Protection Report, (forthcoming 2022).Google Scholar

Lord, J., Guernsey, K. N., Balfe, J. M., Karr, V. L. and Flowers, N. (eds.). Human Rights: Yes! Action and Advocacy on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (Human Rights Resource Center, 2009), https://hpod.law.harvard.edu/pdf/Human-Rights-Yes.pdf.Google Scholar

Lucy, W. ‘The normative standing of access to justice: an argument from non-domination’ (2016) 33 Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice 231.Google Scholar

Lucy, W. ‘Access to justice and the rule of law’ (2020) 40 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 377.Google Scholar

MacCoun, R. J. ‘Voice, control, and belonging: the double-edged sword of procedural fairness’ (2005) 1 Annual Review of Law and Social Science 171.Google Scholar

Mackenzie, C. ‘Embodied agents, narrative selves’ (2014) 17 Philosophical Explorations 154.CrossRef Google Scholar

Mackenzie, C. and Rogers, W. (2013) ‘Autonomy, vulnerability and capacity: a philosophical appraisal of the Mental Capacity Act’ 9 International Journal of Law in Context 37.Google Scholar

Mackenzie, C. and Stoljar, N. (eds.). Relational Autonomy: Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency, and the Social Self (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Mant, J. ‘Neoliberalism, family law and the cost of access to justice’ (2017) 39 Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 246.Google Scholar

Martin, W., Michalowski, S., Jutten, T. and Burch, M. Achieving CRPD Compliance (Colchester: Essex Autonomy Project, 2014), http://repository.essex.ac.uk/13624/1/EAP-Position-Paper-FINAL-copy.pdf.Google Scholar

Martin, W., Michalowski, S., Stavert, J., Ward, A., Ruck Keene, A., Caughey, A., Hempsey, A. and McGregor, R. Three Jurisdictions Report: Towards Compliance with CRPD Art. 12 in Capacity/Incapacity Legislation across the UK (Colchester: Essex Autonomy Project, 2016), https://autonomy.essex.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/EAP-3J-Final-Report-2016.pdf.Google Scholar

May, C. ‘Elder and guardianship mediation: a review of the Canadian EGM report and its relevance in the UK’ (2012) 4 Elder Law Journal 12.Google Scholar

May, C. ‘Court of Protection mediation research: where are we in the UK?’ (2019), www.adultcaremediation.co.uk/Court_of_Protection_Mediation_Research_190531.pdf.Google Scholar

Mayo, M., Koessl, G., Scott, M. and Slater, I. Access to Justice for Disadvantaged Communities (Bristol: Policy Press, 2015).Google Scholar

McKenna, B. J. and Graham, P. ‘Technocratic discourse: a primer’ (2000) 30 Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 223.Google Scholar

McKimmie, B. M., Hays, J. M. and Tait, D. ‘Just spaces: does courtroom design affect how the defendant is perceived?’ (2016) 23 Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 885.Google Scholar

McNay, L. ‘Suffering, silence and social weightlessness: Honneth and Bourdieu on embodiment and power’ in Gonzalez-Arnal, S., Jagger, G. and Lennon, K. (eds.), Embodied Selves (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012).Google Scholar

Menkel-Meadow, C. J. Mediation, Arbitration, and Alternative Dispute Resolution (New York: Elsevier, 2015).Google Scholar

Menkel-Meadow, C. J. ‘The evolving complexity of dispute resolution ethics 30th anniversary commemorative issue: commemorative contributions’ (2017) 30 Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 389.Google Scholar

Menkel-Meadow, C. J. (ed.). Mediation: Theory, Policy and Practice (Abingdon: Routledge 2018).Google Scholar

Merry, S. E. Getting Justice and Getting Even: Legal Consciousness among Working-Class Americans (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Meyerson, D. and Mackenzie, C. ‘Procedural justice and the law’ (2018) 13 Philosophy Compass e12548.Google Scholar

Meyerson, D., Mackenzie, C. and MacDermott, T. (eds.). Procedural Justice and Relational Theory: Empirical, Philosophical, and Legal Perspectives (Abingdon: Routledge, 2021).Google Scholar

Ministry of Justice. Family Court Statistics Quarterly: October to December 2020 (2020), www.gov.uk/government/statistics/family-court-statistics-quarterly-october-to-december-2020.Google Scholar

Minkowitz, T. ‘CRPD and transformative equality’ (2017) 13 International Journal of Law in Context 77.Google Scholar

Montgomery, J., Jones, C. and Biggs, H. ‘Hidden law-making in the province of medical jurisprudence’ (2014) 77 Modern Law Review 343.Google Scholar

Mulcahy, L. ‘The unbearable lightness of being? Shifts towards the virtual trial’ (2008) 35 Journal of Law and Society 464.Google Scholar

Mulcahy, L. Legal Architecture: Justice, Due Process and the Place of Law (Abingdon: Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar

Mulcahy, L. and Rowden, E. The Democratic Courthouse: A Modern History of Design, Due Process and Dignity (Abingdon: Routledge, 2020).Google Scholar

Murris, K. ‘The epistemic challenge of hearing child’s voice’ (2013) 32 Studies in Philosophy and Education 245.Google Scholar

Naffine, N. Law’s Meaning of Life: Philosophy, Religion, Darwin and the Legal Person (Oxford: Hart, 2009).Google Scholar

Naffine, N. and Owens, R. (eds.). Sexing the Subject of Law (North Ryde, NSW: LBC Information Services and Sweet and Maxwell, 1997).Google Scholar

Nedelsky, J. ‘Law, boundaries, and the bounded self’ (1990) 30 Representations 162.CrossRef Google Scholar

Nedelsky, J. Law’s Relations: A Relational Theory of Self, Autonomy, and Law (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011).Google Scholar

Nicolson, D. Evidence and Proof in Scotland: Context and Critique (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2019).Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. C. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. C. Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality and Species Membership (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Nussbaum, M. C. ‘The capabilities of people with cognitive disabilities’ in Kittay, E. F. and Carlson, L. (eds.), Cognitive Disability and Its Challenge to Moral Philosophy (Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2010).Google Scholar

Oliver, M. The Politics of Disablement (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1990).Google Scholar

O’Neill, O. Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Oorschot, I., Mascini, P. and Weenink, D. ‘Remorse in context(s)’ (2017) 26 Social & Legal Studies 359.Google Scholar

Oshana, M. Personal Autonomy in Society (Farnham: Ashgate, 2006).Google Scholar

Paul, S., Nakhost, A., Stergiopoulos, V., Matheson, F. I., Simpson, A. I. F. and Guimond, T. ‘Perceptions of key stakeholders on procedural justice in the Consent and Capacity Board of Ontario’s hearings’ (2020) 68 International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 1.Google Scholar

Peeples, R. A., Reynolds, S. and Harris, C. T. ‘It’s the conflict, stupid: an empirical study of factors that inhibit successful mediation in high-conflict custody cases’ (2008) 43 Wake Forest Law Review 505.Google Scholar

Penney, J. N. ‘The biopsychosocial model: redefining osteopathic philosophy?’ (2013) 16 International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine 33.Google Scholar

Perry, A. ‘The flexibility rule in administrative law’ (2017) 76 Cambridge Law Journal 375.Google Scholar

Perry-Kessaris, A. ‘The pop-up museum of legal objects project: an experiment in socio-legal design special issue’ (2017) 68 Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly 225.Google Scholar

Perry-Kessaris, A. ‘Legal design for practice, activism, policy, and research’ (2019) 46 Journal of Law and Society 185.Google Scholar

Perry-Kessaris, A. ‘Work in progress: doing socio-legal research in design mode’ (2019), www.amandaperrykessaris.org/2019/11/28/work-in-progress-doing-socio-legal-research-in-design-mode/.Google Scholar

Petersen, A. C. and Olsson, J. I. ‘Calling evidence-based practice into question: acknowledging phronetic knowledge in social work’ (2015) 45 British Journal of Social Work 1581.Google Scholar

Pettit, P. ‘The cunning of trust’ (1995) 24 Philosophy and Public Affairs 202.Google Scholar

Pincock, H. ‘Does mediation make us better? Exploring the capacity-building potential of community mediation’ (2013) 31 Conflict Resolution Quarterly 13.Google Scholar

Pritchard-Jones, L. ‘The good, the bad, and the “vulnerable older adult”’ (2016) 38 Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 51.Google Scholar

Pruitt, D. G., Peirce, R. S., McGillicuddy, N. B., Welton, G. L. and Castrianno, L. M. ‘Long-term success in mediation’ (1993) 17 Law and Human Behavior 313.Google Scholar

Rawls, J. A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Rhode, D. ‘Access to justice’ (2000–2001) 69 Fordham Law Review 1785.Google Scholar

Richardson, G. ‘Existing approaches to process in administrative law: the legal regulation of process’, in Richardson, G. and Genn, H. (eds.), Administrative Law and Government Action (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Riles, A. ‘Anthropology, human rights, and legal knowledge: culture in the iron cage’ (2006) 108 American Anthropologist 52.Google Scholar

Rock, P. The Social World of an English Crown Court: Witnesses and Professionals at the Crown Court Centre at Wood Green (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Roelofs, P. ‘Transparency and mistrust: who or what should be made transparent?’ (2019) 32 Governance 565.Google Scholar

Romelli, K., Frigerio, A. and Colombo, M. ‘DSM over time: from legitimisation of authority to hegemony’ (2016) 11 BioSocieties 1.Google Scholar

Roosevelt, E. ‘The great question. Remarks delivered at the United Nations in New York on March 27, 1958’ (New York: United Nations, 1958).Google Scholar

Rossner, M., Tait, D., McKimmie, B. and Sarre, R. ‘The dock on trial: courtroom design and the presumption of innocence’ (2017) 44 Journal of Law and Society 317.Google Scholar

Ruck Keene, A., Bartlett, P. and Allen, N. ‘Litigation friends or foes? Representation of “P” before the Court of Protection’ (2016) 24 Medical Law Review 333.Google Scholar

Ruck Keene, A., Edwards, K., Eldergill, A., Mackintosh, N. and Miles, S. Court of Protection Handbook (Legal Action Group, 2020).Google Scholar

Ruck Keene, A., Kane, N. B., Kim, S. Y. H. and Owen, G. S. ‘Taking capacity seriously? Ten years of mental capacity disputes before England’s Court of Protection’ (2019) 62 International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 56.Google Scholar

Sandland, R. ‘Concubitu prohibere vago: sex and the idiot girl’ (2013) 21 Feminist Legal Studies 81.Google Scholar

Sandland, R. ‘Sex and capacity: the management of monsters?’ (2013) 76 Modern Law Review 981.Google Scholar

Scherpe, J. and Marten, B. ‘Mediation in England and Wales: regulation and practice’ in Hopt, K. J. and Steffek, F. (eds.), Mediation: Principles and Regulation in Comparative Perspective (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Scully, J. L. ‘Disability and the thinking body’ in Gonzalez-Arnal, S., Jagger, G. and Lennon, K. (eds.), Embodied Selves (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012).Google Scholar

Scully, J. L. ‘Disability and vulnerability: on bodies, dependence and power’ in Mackenzie, C., Rogers, W. and Dodds, S. (eds.), Vulnerability: New Essays in Ethics and Feminist Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Sen, A. Commodoties and Capabilities (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985).Google Scholar

Sen, A. Development as Freedom (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Sen, A. The Idea of Justice (London: Allen Lane, 2009).Google Scholar

Series, L. ‘Relationships, autonomy and legal capacity: mental capacity and support paradigms’ (2015) 40 International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 80.Google Scholar

Series, L., Fennell, P., Clements, L. and Doughty, J. Transparency in the Court of Protection (Cardiff: Cardiff University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Series, L., Fennell, P. and Doughty, J. The Participation of P in Welfare Cases in the Court of Protection (Cardiff: Cardiff University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Series, L., Mercer, A., Walbridge, A., Mobbs, K., Fennell, P., Doughty, J. and Clements, L. Use of the Court of Protection’s Welfare Jurisdiction by Supervisory Bodies in England and Wales (Cardiff: Cardiff University Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Shakespeare, T. Disability Rights and Wrongs (Abingdon: Routledge, 2006).Google Scholar

Shogren, K., Wehmeyer, M., Martinis, J. and Blanck, P. Supported Decision-making: Theory, Research, and Practice to Enhance Self-determination and Quality of Life (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019).Google Scholar

Simmons, M. B. and Gooding, P. M. ‘Spot the difference: shared decision-making and supported decision-making in mental health’ (2017) 34 Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine 275.Google Scholar

Skowron, P. ‘The relationship between autonomy and adult mental capacity in the law of England and Wales’ (2019) 27 Medical Law Review 32.Google Scholar

Smart, C. Feminism and the Power of Law (London: Routledge, 1989).Google Scholar

Stebbings, C. ‘Protecting the property of the mentally ill: the judicial solution in nineteenth century lunacy law’ (2012) 71 Cambridge Law Journal 384 . Google Scholar

Steup, Matthias and Ram, Neta, ‘Epistemology’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2020 edition), Zalta, E. (ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/epistemology/.Google Scholar

Susskind, R. Online Courts and the Future of Justice (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019).Google Scholar

Tait, D. ‘Rituals and spaces in innovative courts’ (2018) 27 Griffith Law Review 233.Google Scholar

Tallodi, T. How Parties Experience Mediation: An Interview Study on Relationship Changes in Workplace Mediation (London: Springer, 2019).Google Scholar

Taylor, H. J. ‘What are “Best Interests”? A critical evaluation of “Best Interests” decision-making in clinical practice’ (2016) 24 Medical Law Review 176.Google Scholar

Thibault, J. and Walker, L. Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1975).Google Scholar

Thirty-Nine Essex Chambers. Mental Capacity Report: Health, Welfare and Deprivation of Liberty (December 2019), www.39essex.com/mental-capacity-report-december-2019/.Google Scholar

Trevithick, P. ‘Revisiting the knowledge base of social work: a framework for practice’ (2008) 38 British Journal of Social Work 1212.Google Scholar

Twining, W. Evidence and Legal Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997).Google Scholar

Tyler, T. ‘Procedural justice, legitimacy, and the effective rule of law’ (2003) 30 Crime and Justice 283.Google Scholar

Tyler, T. ‘Procedural justice’ in Sarat, A. (ed.), The Blackwell Companion to Law and Society (Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2004).Google Scholar

Tyler, T. ‘Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation’ (2006) 57 Annual Review of Psychology 375.Google Scholar

Tyler, T. Why People Obey the Law (Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Tyler, T., Degoey, P. and Smith, H. ‘Understanding why the justice of group procedures matters: a test of the psychological dynamics of the group-value model’ (1996) 70 Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 913.Google Scholar

Umbreit, M., Coates, R. B. and Kalanj, B. Victim Meets Offender: The Impact of Restorative Justice and Mediation (New York: Criminal Justice Press, 2010).Google Scholar

UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. The System of Guardianship in Practice in the Republic of Moldova: Human Rights and Vulnerability of Persons Declared Incapacitated (UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, 2013), www.un.md/key_doc_pub/STUDY_The_System_of_Guardianship_in_Practice_in%20_Republic_of_Moldova.pdf.Google Scholar

Unsworth, C. ‘Law and lunacy in psychiatry’s “Golden Age”’ (1993) 13 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 479.Google Scholar

Walklate, S., Maher, J., McCulloch, J., Fitz-Gibbon, K. and Beavis, K. ‘Victim stories and victim policy: is there a case for a narrative victimology?’ (2019) 15 Crime, Media, Culture 199.Google Scholar

Wanderer, J. ‘Addressing testimonial injustice: being ignored and being rejected’ (2012) 62 The Philosophical Quarterly 148.Google Scholar

Westlund, A. C. ‘Rethinking relational autonomy’ (2009) 24 Hypatia 26.Google Scholar

Weston, J. ‘Managing mental incapacity in the 20th century: a history of the Court of Protection of England & Wales’ (2020) 68 International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 101524.Google Scholar

Wilkinson, D., Barclay, S. and Savulescu, J. ‘Disagreement, mediation, arbitration: resolving disputes about medical treatment’ (2018) 391 The Lancet 2302.Google Scholar

Williams, J., Gill, C., Creutzfeldt, N. and Vivian, N. ‘Participation as a framework for analysing consumers’ experiences of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR)’ (2020) 47 Journal of Law and Society 271.Google Scholar

Winick, B. J. ‘On autonomy: legal and psychological perspectives’ (1992) 37 Villanova Law Review 1765.Google Scholar

Winick, B. J. ‘The right to refuse mental health treatment: a therapeutic jurisprudence analysis’ (1994) 17 International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 99.Google Scholar

Wissler, R. L. ‘The effectiveness of court-connected dispute resolution in civil cases’ (2004) 22 Conflict Resolution Quarterly 55.Google Scholar

Wong, S. and Cain, R. ‘The impact of cuts in legal aid funding of private family law cases’ (2019) 41 Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law.Google Scholar

Woolf, L. ‘Are the courts excessively deferential to the medical profession?’ (2001) 9 Medical Law Review 1.Google Scholar

Book contents

References

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive