Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:35:52.485Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Sol Picciotto
Sol Picciotto
Affiliation:
Lancaster University
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Regulating Global Corporate Capitalism , pp. 469 - 543
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aaron, H. J. and Slemrod, J. 2004. The Crisis in Tax Administration. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Abbott, F. M. 2009. ‘Cross-Retaliation in TRIPs: Options for Developing Countries’, Geneva: ICSID.
Abbott, F. M., Breining-Kaufmann, C. and Cottier, T. 2006. International Trade and Human Rights: Foundations and Conceptual Issues. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Abbott, K. W., Keohane, R. O., Moravcsik, A., Slaughter, A.-M. and Snidal, D. 2000. ‘The Concept of Legalization’, International Organization, 54: 401–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, K. W. and Snidal, D. 2000. ‘Hard and Soft Law in International Governance’, International Organization, 54: 421–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aberbach, J. D. and Christensen, T. 2007. ‘The Challenges of Modernizing Tax Administration. Putting Customers First in Coercive Public Organizations’, Public Policy and Administration, 22: 155–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abolafia, M. Y. 1985. ‘Self-Regulation as Market Maintenance’, in Noll, R. G. (ed.), Regulatory Policy and the Social Sciences, 312–43. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Adam, N. 1992. Regulating Global Financial Markets. London: Economist Intelligence Unit.Google Scholar
Adler, E. and Bernstein, S. 2005. ‘Knowledge in Power: The Epistemic Construction of Global Governance’, in Barnett, M. N. and Duvall, R. (eds.), Power in Global Governance, 294–318. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Adler-Karlsson, G. 1968. Western Economic Warfare 1947–1967. A Case Study in Foreign Economic Policy. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Aguesse, P. 2007. ‘Is Rating an Efficient Response to the Challenges of the Structured Finance Market?’, Risk and Trend Mapping No. 2, Paris: Autorité des Marchés Financiers.Google Scholar
Ahn, D. 2003. ‘Linkages between International Financial and Trade Institutions: IMF, World Bank and WTO’: School of Public Policy and Management, Korea Development Institute.
,AIPPI 1997. AIPPI and the Development of Industrial Property 1897–1997. Paris: AIPPI (Association Internationale pour la Protection de la Propriété Intellectuelle).Google Scholar
Akehurst, M. 1972–3. ‘Jurisdiction in International Law’, British Yearbook of International Law, 46: 145–257.Google Scholar
Akinsanya, A. 1980. The Expropriation of Multinational Property in the Third World. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Akinsanya, A. 1987. ‘International Protection of Direct Foreign Investments in the Third World’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 36: 58–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alderton, T. and Winchester, N. 2002. ‘Globalisation and Deregulation in the Maritime Industry’, Marine Policy, 26: 35–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, K., Dhumale, R. and Eatwell, J. 2006. Global Governance of Financial Systems: The International Regulation of Systemic Risk. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alford, D. E. 1992. ‘Basle Committee Minimum Standards: International Regulatory Response to the Failure of BCCI’, George Washington Journal of International Law and Economics, 26: 241–91.Google Scholar
Alston, P. 2002. ‘Resisting the Merger and Acquisition of Human Rights by Trade Law: A Reply to Petersmann’, European Journal of International Law, 13: 815–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, P. and Robinson, M. 2005. Human rights and Development: Towards Mutual Reinforcement. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, P. and Tomasevski, K. 1984. The Right to Food. Utrecht: M. Nijhoff; SIM Netherlands Institute of Human Rights.Google Scholar
Alter, K. J. 2003. ‘Resolving or Exacerbating Disputes? The WTO's New Dispute Resolution System’, International Affairs, 79: 783–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altinger, L. and Enders, A. 1996. ‘The Scope and Depth of GATS Commitments’, World Economy, 19: 307–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altman, Z. D. 2005. Dispute Resolution under Tax Treaties. Amsterdam: IBFD.Google Scholar
Alvarez, J. E. 1989. ‘Political Protectionism and United States International Investment Obligations in Conflict: The Hazards of Exon–Florio’, Virginia Journal of International Law, 30: 1–187.Google Scholar
Aman, A. C. 2002. ‘Globalization, Democracy, and the Need for a New Administrative Law. Symposium: New Forms of Governance: Ceding Public Power to Private Actors’, UCLA Law Review, 49: 1687–716.Google Scholar
Amani, B. and Coombe, R. 2005. ‘The Human Genome Diversity Project: The Politics of Patents at the Intersection of Race, Religion, and Research Ethics’, Law and Policy, 27: 152–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,ANAO 2008. The Australian Taxation Office's Strategies to Address Tax Haven Compliance Risks. ACT: Australian National Audit Office.Google Scholar
Andersen, B. and Frenz, M. 2007. The Impact of Music Downloads and P2P File-Sharing on the Purchase of Music: A Study for Industry Canada (www.ic.gc.ca).
Anderson, B. 1991. Imagined Communities. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Anderson, M. 1989. Policing the World. Interpol and the Politics of International Police Cooperation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Andersson, S. and Heywood, P. M. 2009. ‘The Politics of Perception: Use and Abuse of Transparency International's Approach to Measuring Corruption’, Political Studies, 57: 746–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anghie, A. 1999. ‘Finding the Peripheries: Sovereignty and Colonialism in Nineteenth-Century International Law’, Harvard International Law Journal, 40: 1–80.Google Scholar
Ansell, C. and Vogel, D. (eds.) 2006. What's the Beef? The Contested Governance of European Food Safety. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Antoine, R.-M. B. 1999. Commonwealth Caribbean Law and Legal Systems. London: Cavendish.Google Scholar
Aoki, K. 1998. ‘Neocolonialism, Anti-commons Property, and Biopiracy in the (Not-So-Brave) New World Order of International Intellectual Property Protection’, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 6: 11–58.Google Scholar
Aoki, K. 2009. ‘Free Seeds, Not Free Beer’, Fordham Law Review, 77: 2275–310.Google Scholar
Appelbaum, R. P. 1998. ‘The Future of Law in a Global Economy’, Social and Legal Studies, 7: 171–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appelbaum, R. P., Felstiner, W. L. F. and Gessner, V. 2001. Rules and Networks: The Legal Culture of Global Business Transactions. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Arrighi, G. 2007. Adam Smith in Beijing: Lineages of the Twenty-First Century. LondonVerso.Google Scholar
Arthurs, H. 2001. ‘The Reconstitution of the Public Domain’, in Drache, D. (ed.), The Market or the Public Domain? Global Governance and the Asymmetry of Power, 85–109. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Arup, C. 2000. The New World Trade Organization Agreements: Globalizing Law through Services and Intellectual Property. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Atik, J. 1997. ‘Science and International Regulatory Convergence’, Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business, 17: 736–58.Google Scholar
Aust, A. 2008. Modern Treaty Law and Practice. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Treasury, Australia, 2004. New International Tax Arrangements (Participation Exemption and Other Measures) Bill 2004. Explanatory Memoranda, Canberra: Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia, House of Representatives.Google Scholar
Avi-Yonah, R. S. 1996. ‘The Structure of International Taxation: A Proposal for Simplification’, Texas Law Review, 74: 1301–59.Google Scholar
Avi-Yonah, R. S. 2001. ‘Globalization and Tax Competition: Implications for Developing Countries’: Inter-American Development Bank.
Avi-Yonah, R. S. 2007. International Tax as International Law. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avi-Yonah, R. S. 2009. ‘Closing the International Tax Gap Via Cooperation, Not Competition’, Worldwide Tax Daily, 10 September.Google Scholar
Avi-Yonah, and Benshalom, I. 2010. ‘Formulary Apportionment: Myths and Prospects – Promoting Better International Tax Policy and Utilizing the Misunderstood and Under-Theorized Formulary Alternative’, SSRN eLibrary.
Ayres, I. and Braithwaite, J. 1992. Responsive Regulation. Transcending the Deregulation Debate. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bacchus, J. 2002. ‘Table Talk: Around the Table of the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organization’, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 35: 1021–39.Google Scholar
Badie, B. 2000. The Imported State: The Westernization of the Political Order. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bagley, M. A. 2003. ‘Patently Unconstitutional: The Geographical Limitation on Prior Art in a Small World’, Minnesota Law Review, 87: 679–742.Google Scholar
Bagley, M. A. 2008. ‘The Need for Speed (and Grace): Issues in a First-Inventor-to-File World’, University of Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper Series. Working Paper 100.
Baiocchi, G. 2001. ‘Participation, Activism, and Politics: The Porto Alegre Experiment and Deliberative Democratic Theory’, Politics and Society, 29: 43–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bairoch, P. 1996. ‘Globalization Myths and Realities. One Century of External Trade and Foreign Investment’, in Boyer, R. and Drache, D. (eds.), States Against Markets. The Limits of Globalization, 173–92. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Baistrocchi, E. A. 2008. ‘The Use and Interpretation of Tax Treaties in the Emerging World: Theory and Implications’, British Tax Review, 352–91.
Bakan, J. 2004. The Corporation: The Pathological Pursuit of Profit and Power. London: Constable.Google Scholar
Baker, D. and Ayer, D. B. 1993. ‘Anti-Trust Imperialism’, European Competition Law Review, 14: 3–5.Google Scholar
Baker, R. 2005. Capitalism's Achilles Heel. Dirty Money and How to Renew the Free-Market System. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Baldwin, D. A. (ed.) 1993. Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate. New York: Columbia University Press.
Ball, G. W. 1967. ‘Cosmocorp – The Importance of Being Stateless’, Columbia Journal of World Business, 2: 25–32.Google Scholar
Ball, G. W. (ed.) 1975. Global Companies: The Political Economy of World Business. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bantekas, I. 2006. ‘Corruption as an International Crime and Crime Against Humanity’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, 4: 466–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bantekas, I. and Nash, S. 2003. International Criminal Law. London: Cavendish.Google Scholar
Bantekas, I. and Nash, S. 2010. International Criminal Law. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Bardach, E. and Kagan, R. A. 1982. Going by the Book: The Problem of Regulatory Unreasonableness. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Barfield, C. E. (ed.) 1996. International Financial Markets. Harmonization versus Competition. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
Barnes, J. J. 1974. Authors, Publishers and Politicians. The Quest for an Anglo-American Copyright Agreement 1815–1854. London: RKP.Google Scholar
Bartels, L. 2001. ‘Applicable Law in WTO Dispute Settlement Proceedings’, Journal of World Trade, 35: 499–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, C. A. and Ghoshal, S. 1989. Managing Across Borders. The Transnational Solution. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Barton, J. 2000. ‘Reforming the Patent System’, Science, 287: 1933–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barzel, Y. 1997. Economic Analysis of Property Rights. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baslar, K. 1998. The Concept of the Common Heritage of Mankind in International Law. The Hague: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Bassiouni, M. C. 1974. International Extradition and World Public Order. Leiden: Sijthoff.Google Scholar
Bassiouni, M. C. 2001. ‘Universal Jurisdiction for International Crimes: Historical Perspectives and Contemporary Practice’, Virginia Journal of International Law, 42: 81–162.Google Scholar
Baughn, C., Bodie, N. L., Buchanan, M. A. and Bixby, M. B. 2010. ‘Bribery in International Business Transactions’, Journal of Business Ethics, 92: 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baunsgaard, T. and Keen, M. 2005. ‘Tax Revenue and (or?) Trade Liberalization’, Working Paper 05/112: International Monetary Fund, Fiscal Affairs Dept.
Baxi, U. 1986. Inconvenient Forum and Convenient Catastrophe: The Bhopal Case. Bombay: Tripathi.Google Scholar
Baxi, U. 1999. ‘Mass Torts, Multinational Enterprise Liability and Private International Law’, Recueil des Cours de l'Académie de Droit International, 276: 301–427.Google Scholar
,BBS 1995. Report of the Board of Banking Supervision Inquiry into the Collapse of Barings. London: Board of Banking Supervision.Google Scholar
,Basel Committee on Banking Supervision 1999. Banks' Interactions with Highly Leveraged Institutions. Basel: Basel Committee on Banking Supervision.Google Scholar
,Basel Committee on Banking Supervision 2009. Strengthening the Resilience of the Banking Sector – Consultative Document. Basel: Basel Committee on Banking Supervision.Google Scholar
,BCG 2010. Global Wealth. Regaining Lost Ground. Resurgent Markets and New Opportunities. Boston Consulting Group.Google Scholar
Bebchuk, L. A. and Roe, M. J. 1999. ‘A Theory of Path Dependence in Corporate Ownership and Governance’, Stanford Law Review, 52: 127–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, T., Coyle, D., Dewatripont, M., Freixas, X. and Seabright, P. 2010. Bailing out the Banks: Reconciling Stability and Competition. An Analysis of State-Supported Schemes for Financial Institutions. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.Google Scholar
Becker, G. S. 1976. The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Beier, F.-K. 1984. ‘One Hundred Years of International Cooperation – The Role of the Paris Convention in the Past, Present and Future’, IIC, 15: 1–20.Google Scholar
Bélanger, J., Björkman, T. and Köhler, C. (eds.) 1999. Being Local Worldwide: ABB and the Challenge of Global Management. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Belchem, J. 1992. ‘The Neglected “Unstamped”: The Manx Pauper Press of the 1840s’, Albion, 24: 605–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, A. S. 2003. Forum Shopping and Venue in Transnational Litigation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bell, D. 1973. The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. An Essay in Social Forecasting. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Bell, D. and Graubard, S. R. (eds.) 1997. Toward the Year 2000. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bell, S. and Quiggin, J. 2006. ‘Asset Price Instability and Policy Responses: The Legacy of Liberalization’, Journal of Economic Issues, 40: 629–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellis, M.. 2006. ‘Global Standards for Domestic Financial Regulations: Concourse, Competition and Mutual Reinforcement between Different Types of Global Administration’, Global Jurist Advances, 6: 3 (art. 6).Google Scholar
Benhabib, S. (ed.) 1996. Democracy and Difference. Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. PrincetonUniversity Press.
Benkler, Y. 2003. ‘Freedom in the Commons: Towards a Political Economy of Information’, Duke Law Journal, 52: 1245–76.Google Scholar
Bentley, L. 2007. ‘Rosen: GPL Is Good, but OSL Is Better’, 21 June, IT Business Edge.
Benvenisti, E. and Downs, G. W. 2007. ‘The Empire's New Clothes: Political Economy and the Fragmentation of International Law’, Stanford Law Review, 60: 595–631.Google Scholar
Berle, A. A. and Means, G. C. 1932. The Modern Corporation and Private Property. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bernard, A. B., Jensen, J. B. and Schott, P. K. 2008. ‘Transfer Pricing by US-Based Multinational Firms’, Discussion Papers CES 08–29 Washington, DC: Center for Economic Studies, Bureau of the Census.
Bernstein, M. H. 1955. Regulating Business by Independent Commission. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, S. and Hannah, E. 2008. ‘Non-State Global Standard Setting and the WTO: Legitimacy and the Need for Regulatory Space’, Journal of International Economic Law, 11: 575–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhagwati, J. 2005. ‘From Seattle to Hong Kong’, Foreign Affairs, 84 (art. 15).Google Scholar
Bhagwati, J. and Hudec, R. E. (eds.) 1996. Fair Trade and Harmonization. Prerequisites for Free Trade? Vol. 2 Legal Analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bhagwati, J. and Patrick, H. T. (eds.) 1990. Aggressive Unilateralism. America's 301 Trading Policy and the World Trading System. Ann Arbor: University ofMichigan Press.
Bhagwati, P. N. 1989. ‘Travesty of justice’, 15 March, India Today.
Bhala, R. 1999a. ‘The Myth about Stare Decisis and International Trade Law (Part One of a Trilogy)’, American University International Law Review, 14: 845–956.Google Scholar
Bhala, R. 1999b. ‘The Precedent Setters: De Facto Stare Decisis in WTO Adjudication (Part Two of a Trilogy)’, Journal of Transnational Law and Policy, 9: 1–151.Google Scholar
Bingham, L. J. 1992. Report of the Inquiry into the Supervision of the Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI). Chairman: The Right Honourable Lord Justice Bingham. London: UK Treasury.Google Scholar
,Bank for International Settlements 1998. Annual Report. Basel: Bank for International Settlements.Google Scholar
,Bank for International Settlements 2007. Triennial Central Bank Survey. Foreign Exchange and Derivatives Market Activity in 2007. Basel: Bank for International Settlements.Google Scholar
,Bank for International Settlements 2009. Annual Report. Basel: Bank for International Settlements.Google Scholar
Bittlingmayer, G. 1985. ‘Did Antitrust Policy Cause the Great Merger Wave?’, Journal of Law and Economics, 28: 77–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, J. 1998. ‘Regulation as Facilitation: Negotiating the Genetic Revolution’, Modern Law Review, 61: 621–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blackburn, R. 2002. Banking on Death: Or, Investing in Life: The History and Future of Pensions. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Blanpain, R. 1979. The OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Labour Relations 1976–1979. Experience and Review. Deventer: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanpain, R. 1983. The OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Labour Relations 1979–82: Experience and Mid-term Report. Deventer: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Bloom, A. 2001. ‘Taking on Goliath. Why Personal Injury Litigation May Represent the Future of Transnational Cause Lawyering’, in Sarat, A. and Scheingold, S. (eds.), Cause Lawyering and the State in a Global Era. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blouin, C., Drager, N. and Smith, R. 2006. International Trade in Health Services and the GATS: Current Issues and Debates. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Blum, J., Levi, M., Naylor, T. and Williams, P. 1998. Financial Havens, Banking Secrecy and Money-Laundering. Vienna: UN Office for Drug Control and Crime Prevention.Google Scholar
Blumberg, P. I. 1986. ‘Limited Liability and Corporate Groups’, Journal of Corporation Law, 11: 573–631.Google Scholar
Blumberg, P. I. 1993. The Multinational Challenge to Corporation Law: The Search for a New Corporate Personality. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blunden, G. 1977. ‘International Cooperation in Banking Supervision’, Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, 17: 325–9.Google Scholar
Bodansky, D. 1999. ‘The Framework Convention/Protocol Approach’, WHO/NCD/TFI/99.1 Geneva: World Health Organization.
Bodenhausen, G. H. C. 1968. Guide to the Application of the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property. As revised at Stockholm in 1967. Geneva: United International Bureaux for the Protection of Intellectual Property (BIRPI).Google Scholar
Bogle, J. C. 2008. ‘A Question So Important that it Should Be Hard to Think about Anything Else’, Journal of Portfolio Management, 34: 95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boldrin, M. and Levine, D. 2002. ‘The Case Against Intellectual Property’, American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 92: 209–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boltanski, L. and Chiapello, E. 1999. Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Bolton, D. 1985. Nationalization – A Road to Socialism? The Lessons of Tanzania. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Bonney, R. (ed.) 1999. The Rise of the Fiscal State in Europe, c.1200–1815. Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Bonsignore, E. 2008. ‘Defence, Trade and the Misuse of Justice’, Military Technology, 32: 8–9.Google Scholar
Botzem, S. and Quack, S. 2006. ‘Contested Rules and Shifting Boundaries: International Standard-Setting in Accounting’, in Djelic, M.-L. and Sahlin-Andersson, K. (eds.), Transnational Governance. Institutional Dynamics of Regulation, 266–86. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1986. ‘La force du droit. Eléments pour une sociologie du champ juridique’, Actes de la Recherche en Science Sociales, 64: 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1987. ‘The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridical Field’, Hastings Law Journal, 38: 805–53.Google Scholar
Bowring, F. 2003. Science, Seeds, and Cyborgs: Biotechnology and the Appropriation of Life. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Boyle, J. 1996. Shamans, Software and Spleens. Law and the Construction of the Information Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Boyle, J. 2003. ‘The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain’, Law and Contemporary Problems, 66: 33–74.Google Scholar
Boyrie, M. E., Pak, S. J. and Zdanowicz, J. S. 2004. ‘Estimating the Magnitude of Capital Flight due to Abnormal Pricing in International Trade: The Russia–USA Case’: CIBER Working Paper; Center for International Business and Education Research, Florida International University.
Braga, C. A. P., Forestier, E. and Stern, P. A. 1999. ‘Developing Countries and Accounting Rates Reform – A Technological and Regulatory El Nino?’, Public Policy for the Private Sector, Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, J. 1993. ‘Transnational Regulation of the Pharmaceutical Industry’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 525: 12–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, J. 2000. ‘The New Regulatory State and the Transformation of Criminology’, British Journal of Criminology, 40: 222–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braithwaite, J. 2002. ‘Rules and Principles: A Theory of Legal Certainty’, Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy, 27: 47–82.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, J. 2005. Markets in Vice, Markets in Virtue. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, J. 2008. Regulatory Capitalism. How it Works, Ideas for Making it Work Better. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, J. and Drahos, P. 2000. Global Business Regulation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, V. (ed.) 2003. Taxing Democracy. Understanding Tax Avoidance and Evasion. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Brandeis, L. D. 1914. Other People's Money, and How the Bankers Use it. New York: Frederick A. Stokes.Google Scholar
Bratton, W. W. 2003a. ‘Enron and the Dark Side of Shareholder Value’, Tulane Law Review, 76: 1275–361.Google Scholar
Bratton, W. W. 2003b. ‘Enron, Sarbanes–Oxley and Accounting: Rules versus Principles versus Rents’, Villanova Law Review, 48: 1023–56.Google Scholar
Bratton, W. W. and McCahery, J. 1999. ‘Comparative Corporate Governance and the Theory of the Firm – The Case against Global Cross-Reference’, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 38: 213–98.Google Scholar
Bratton, W. W., McCahery, J., Picciotto, S. and Scott, C. (eds.) 1996. International Regulatory Competition and Coordination. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Bräutigam, D. 2002. ‘Building Leviathan: Revenue, State Capacity and Governance’, IDS Bulletin, 33: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bräutigam, D. 2004. ‘The People's Budget? Politics, Participation and Pro-poor Policy’, Development Policy Review, 22: 653–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bräutigam, D., Fjeldstad, O.-H. and Moore, M. (eds.) 2008. Taxation and State Building in Developing Countries. Capacity and Consent. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Brecher, J., Costello, T. and Smith, B. 2000. Globalization from Below: The Power of Solidarity. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.Google Scholar
Brennan, G. and Buchanan, J. M. 1985. The Reason of Rules. Constitutional Political Economy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brenner, R. 2002. The Boom and the Bubble: The US in the World Economy. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Brenner, R. 2006. The Economics of Global Turbulence: The Advanced Capitalist Economies from Long Boom to Long Downturn, 1945–2005. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Bretschger, L. and Hettich, F. 2002. ‘Globalisation, Capital Mobility and Tax Competition: Theory and Evidence for OECD Countries’, European Journal of Political Economy, 18: 695–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brett, E. A. 1985. The World Economy since the War – The Politics of Uneven Development. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Brilmayer, L. 1989 Justifying International Acts. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Brin, S. 2009. ‘A Library to Last Forever’, 8 October, New York Times.
Brinkley, A. 1993. ‘The Antimonopoly Ideal and the Liberal State: The Case of Thurman Arnold’, Journal of American History, 80: 557–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brock, W. 1982. ‘A Simple Plan for Negotiating on Trade in Services’, World Economy, 229–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronckers, M. 2001. ‘More power to the WTO?’, Journal of International Economic Law, 4: 41–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, D. and Nicholas, G. 2010. ‘Protecting Canadian First Nations and Maori Heritage through Conventional Legal Means’, ‘New Zealand and Canada: Connections, Comparisons and Challenges’ (conference), Wellington, New Zealand, 9–10 February 2010.
Brunsson, N., Jacobsson, B. and Associates, 2000. A World of Standards. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brütsch, C. and Lehmkuhl, D. (eds.) 2007. Law and Legalization in Transnational Relations. London: Routledge.
Buchanan, J. and Tollison, R. D. 1984. The Theory of Public Choice. Ann Arbor: University ofMichigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, P. J. and Roberts, B. R. 1982. European Direct Investment in the USA Before World War I. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budzinski, O. 2003. ‘Toward an International Governance of Transborder Mergers? Competition Networks and Institutions between Centralism and Decentralism’, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 36: 1–52.Google Scholar
Bull, H., Kingsbury, B. and Roberts, A. (eds.) 1990. Hugo Grotius and International Relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Bullard, L. 2005. Freeing the Free Tree. Research Foundation for Science, Technology and Ecology, New Delhi, India; International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements; the Greens/European Free Alliance in the European Parliament.Google Scholar
Búrca, G. and Weiler, J. (eds.) 2001. The European Court of Justice. Oxford University Press.
Burley, A.-M. and Mattli, W. 1993. ‘Europe Before the Court: A Political Theory of European Integration’, International Organization, 47: 41–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnham, P. 1990. The Political Economy of Postwar Reconstruction. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burrough, B. and Helyar, J. [1990] 2004. Barbarians at the Gate: The Fall of RJR Nabisco. London: Cape.Google Scholar
Burton, J. 1972. World Society. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busch, A. 2009. Banking Regulation and Globalization. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Buxbaum, R. M. 2000. ‘Back to the Future? From “Centros” to the “Uberlagerungstheorie”’, in Berger, K. P. and Sandrock, O. (eds.), Festschrift für Otto Sandrock zum 70. Geburtstag, 149–64. Heidelberg: Verlag Recht und Wirtschaft.Google Scholar
Buxbaum, R. M. and Hopt, K. J. (eds.) 1988. Legal Harmonization and the Business Enterprise. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Bygrave, L. A. 2002. ‘The Technologization of Copyright: Implications for Privacy and Related Interests’, European Intellectual Property Review, 24: 51–7.Google Scholar
Cabin, M. A. 2009. ‘Labor Rights in the Peru Agreement: Can Vague Principles Yield Concrete Change?’, Columbia Law Review, 109: 1047–93.Google Scholar
Cabral, W. 1995. ‘Bermuda’, Comparative Law Yearbook of International Business, 23–8.Google Scholar
Cahill, K. 1986. Trade Wars: The High-Technology Scandal of the 1980s. London: W. H. Allen.Google Scholar
Calabresi, G. and Melamed, A. D. 1972. ‘Property Rules, Liability Rules and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral’, Harvard Law Review, 85: 1089–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calaby, C. A. 1989. ‘The Basle Accord: An Opportunity for Expanding Bank Holding Company Securities Activities?’, George Washington Journal of International Law and Economics, 23: 531–72.Google Scholar
Calderon, R., Alvarez-Arce, J. L. and Mayoral, S. 2009. ‘Corporation as a Crucial Ally against Corruption’, Journal of Business Ethics, 87: 319–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callan, E. 2007. ‘Global drive to recover stolen assets’, 18 September, Financial Times.
Callon, M. (ed.) 1998. The Laws of the Markets. Oxford: Blackwell.
Campbell, D. I. 1990. ‘Adam Smith, Farrar on Company Law, and the Economics of the Corporation’, Anglo-American Law Review, 19: 185–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, D. I. 1993. ‘Why Regulate the Modern Corporation? The Failure of “Market Failure”’, in McCahery, J., Picciotto, S. and Scott, C. (eds.), Corporate Control and Accountability. Changing Structures and the Dynamics of Regulation, 103–31. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. I. 1996. The Failure of Marxism: The Concept of Inversion in Marx's Critique of Capitalism. Aldershot: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. I. 1999. ‘The “Hybrid Contract” and the Merging of the Public and Private Law of the Allocation of Economic Goods’, in Lewis, N. D. and Campbell, D. I. (eds.), Promoting Participation: Law or Politics?, 45–73. London: Cavendish.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. I. and Griffin, S. 2006. ‘Enron and the End of Corporate Governance’, in Macleod, S. (ed.), Global Governance and the Quest for Justice. Volume II Corporate Governance, 47–72. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. I. and Klaes, M. 2005. ‘The Principle of Institutional Direction: Coase's Regulatory Critique of Intervention’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 29: 263–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, D. I. and Picciotto, S. 1998. ‘Exploring the Interaction between Law and Economics: The Limits of Formalism’, Legal Studies, 18: 249–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, D. I. and Picciotto, S. 2000. ‘The Justification of Financial Futures Exchanges’, in Hudson, A. (ed.), Modern Financial Techniques, Derivatives, and Law, 121–33. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. I. and Picciotto, S. 2006. ‘The Acceptable Face of Intervention: Intellectual Property in Posnerian Law and Economics’, Social and Legal Studies, 15: 435–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canan, P. and Reichman, N. 2002. Ozone Connections. Expert Networks in Global Environmental Governance. Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf.Google Scholar
Caprio, G. 1997. ‘Safe and Sound Banking in Developing Countries. We're Not in Kansas Anymore’, Washington, DC: World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 1739.
Carbonneau, T. (ed.) 1990. Lex Mercatoria and Arbitration: A Discussion of the New Law Merchant. Dobbs Ferry, NY: Transnational Juris Publications.
Carlisle, R. 1981. Sovereignty for Sale. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, M. B. 1978. Global Perspectives of an International Tax Lawyer. Hicksville, NY: Exposition Press.Google Scholar
Carruthers, B. G. and Ariovich, L. 2004. ‘The Sociology of Property Rights’, Annual Review of Sociology, 30: 23–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, B. G. and Halliday, T. C. 1998. Rescuing Business: The Making of Corporate Bankruptcy Law in England and the United States. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cary, W. L. 1974. ‘Federalism and Corporate Law: Reflections Upon Delaware’, Yale Law Journal, 83: 663–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cass, D. Z. 2005. The Constitutionalization of the World Trade Organization: Legitimacy, Democracy, and Community in the International Trading System. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassels, J. 1993. The Uncertain Promise of Law. Lessons from Bhopal. Toronto University Press.Google Scholar
Castells, M. 1996. The Rise of the Network Society. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Castells, M. 1998. End of Millennium. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Castleman, G. 2002. ‘WTO Confidential: The Case of Asbestos’, International Journal of Health Services, 32: 489–501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
,Center for Food Safety 2005. Monsanto v. US Farmers. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Champ, P. and Attaran, A. 2002. ‘Patent Rights and Local Working under the WTO TRIPs Agreement: An Analysis of the US–Brazil Patent Dispute’, Yale Journal of International Law, 27: 365–93.Google Scholar
Chandler, A. D. 1962. Strategy and Structure: The History of American Industrial Enterprise. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chandler, A. D. 1977. The Visible Hand. The Managerial Revolution in American Business. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University.Google Scholar
Chandler, D. 2000. ‘International Justice’, New Left Review, 2nd series, 6: 55–66.Google Scholar
Chang, H.-J. 2002. Kicking Away the Ladder – Development Strategy in Historical Perspective. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
Charkham, J. P. 1994. Keeping Good Company. A Study of Corporate Governance in Five Countries. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Charlton, A. 2003. ‘Incentive Bidding for Mobile Investment: Economic Consequences and Potential Responses’, DEV/DOC(2003)01 Paris: OECD.
Charnovitz, S. 1995. ‘The World Trade Organization and Social Issues’, Journal of World Trade, 29: 17–33.Google Scholar
Charnovitz, S. 2001. ‘Rethinking Trade Sanctions’, American Journal of International Law, 95: 792–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charny, D. 1991. ‘Competition among Jurisdictions in Formulating Corporate Law Rules: An American Perspective on the “Race to the Bottom” in the European Communities’, Harvard International Law Journal, 32: 423–56.Google Scholar
Chaudhuri, S. 2005. The WTO and India's Pharmaceutical Industry. Patent Protection, TRIPs and Developing Countries. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cheek, M. L. 2001. ‘The Limits of Informal Regulatory Cooperation in International Affairs: A Review of the Global Intellectual Property Regime’, George Washington International Law Review, 33: 277–323.Google Scholar
Cheng, I. 2002. ‘Survivors who laughed all the way to the bank’, 30 July, Financial Times.
Chetley, A. 1986. The Politics of Baby Foods. Successful Challenges to an International Marketing Strategy. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Chimni, B. S. 2004. ‘International Institutions Today: An Imperial Global State in the Making’, European Journal of International Law, 15: 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chinkin, C. 2000. ‘Normative Development in the International Legal System’, in Shelton, D. (ed.), Commitment and Compliance. The Role of Non-Binding Norms in the International Legal System, 21–42. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chua, A. T. L. 1998. ‘Reasonable Expectations and Non-Violation Complaints in GATT/WTO Jurisprudence’, Journal of World Trade, 32: 27–50.Google Scholar
,CIMA 2008. Investments Statistical Digest. Cayman Islands Monetary Authority.Google Scholar
Claessens, S., Klingebiel, D. and Schmukler, S. L. 2002. ‘Explaining the Migration of Stocks from Exchanges in Emerging Economies to International Centers’: World Bank Development Economics Research Group.
Clarke, S. (ed.) 1991. The State Debate. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRef
Clarke, T. 2007. International Corporate Governance. A Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Clausing, K. A. and Avi-Yonah, R. S. 2007. ‘Reforming Corporate Taxation in a Global Economy: A Proposal to Adopt Formulary Apportionment’, Hamilton Project Discussion Paper. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Coase, R. H. 1988. The Firm, the Market and the Law. University ofChicago Press 1988.Google Scholar
Coase, R. H. 1993. ‘Coase on Posner on Coase’, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 149: 96–8.Google Scholar
Cobham, A. 2005. ‘Tax Evasion, Tax Avoidance and Development Finance’, QEH Working Paper Series – QEHWPS129 Oxford.
Cockbain, J. 2007. ‘Intellectual Property Rights and Patents’, in Kennewell, P. D. (ed.), Comprehensive Medicinal Chemistry II. London: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Coen, D. and Thatcher, M. 2005. ‘The New Governance of Markets and Non-Majoritarian Regulators’, Governance, 18: 329–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffee, J. C. 1995. ‘Competition versus Consolidation: The Significance of Organizational Structure in Financial and Securities Regulation’, Business Lawyer, 50: 447–84.Google Scholar
Coffee, J. C. 2001. ‘The Rise of Dispersed Ownership: The Roles of Law and the State in the Separation of Ownership and Control’, Yale Law Journal, 111: 1–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffee, J. C. 2002. ‘Racing towards the top?: The Impact of Cross-Listings and Stock Market Competition on International Corporate Governance’, Columbia Law Review, 102: 1757–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. and Sabel, C. 1997. ‘Directly-Deliberative Polyarchy’, European Law Journal, 3: 313–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. L. and Arato, A. 1992. Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, G. 2009. ‘Code is Speech: Legal Tinkering, Expertise, and Protest among Free and Open Source Software Developers’, Cultural Anthropology, 24: 420–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, H. 1999. Regulating Contracts. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Collins, J. H., Hutchinson, D. S. and Wekstein, W. D. 1996. A Financial Future for Nepal. Boston, MA: Collins & Associates.Google Scholar
Cooke, C. A. 1950. Corporation, Trust and Company. Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Coombe, R. 2010. ‘The Expanding Purview of Cultural Properties and Their Politics’, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 5: 393–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, G. 2008. The Origin of Financial Crises. Petersfield: Harriman House Publishing.Google Scholar
Cooper, H. D. 2002. ‘The International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture’, RECIEL: Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 11: 1–16.Google Scholar
Coornaert, E. L. J. 1967. ‘European Economic Institutions and the New World: The Chartered Companies’, in Rich, E. E. and Wilson, C. H. (eds.), The Cambridge Economic History of Europe, ch. 4.Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
,CopySouth 2009. The Copy/South Dosier. Issues in the Economics, Politics, and Ideology of Copyright in the Global South (www.copysouth.org).
Coriat, B. and Orsini, F. 2002. ‘Establishing a New Intellectual Property Rights Regime in the United States: Origin, Content and Problems’, Research Policy, 31: 1491–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornish, W. R. 1979. ‘Legal Control over Cartels and Monopolization 1880–1914. A Comparison’, in Horn, N. and Kocka, J. (eds.), Law and the Formation of the Big Enterprises in the 19th and Early 20th Centuries280–303. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Cornish, W. R. and Llewelyn, D. 2007. Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights. London: Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar
Costa, H. A. 2006. ‘The Old and the New in the New Labor Internationalism’, in Santos, B. d. S. (ed.), Another Production Is Possible, 243–78. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Cottier, T. and Mavroidis, P. C. (eds.) 2000. Regulatory Barriers and the Principle of Non-Discrimination in Trade Law. Ann Arbor: University ofMichigan Press.CrossRef
Cottier, T., Paulwelyn, J. and Bürgi Bonanomi, E. 2005. Human Rights and International Trade. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottier, T. and Schefer, K. N. 2000. ‘Good Faith and Protection of Legitimate Expectations in the WTO’, in Bronckers, M. and Quick, R. (eds.), New Directions in International Economic Law, Essays in Honour of John H. Jackson47. The Hague: Kluwer Law.Google Scholar
Couper, A. D., Walsh, C., Stanberry, B. and Boerne, G. L. 1999. Voyages of Abuse. Seafarers, Human Rights and International Shipping. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Coupland, D. 1995. Microserfs. London: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Court, J.-F. 1985. ‘La France et les conventions fiscales’, Journal du Droit des Affaires Internationales, 1: 31–90.Google Scholar
Covelli, N. and Hohots, V. 2003. ‘The Health Regulation of Biotech Foods under the WTO Agreements’, Journal of International Economic Law, 6: 773–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowhey, P. 2004. ‘Accounting Rates, Cross-Border Services, and the Next WTO Round on Basic Telecommunications Services’, in Geradin, D. and Luff, D. (eds.), The WTO and Global Convergence in Telecommunications and Audio-Visual Services, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crawford, J.-A. and Fiorentino, R. V. 2005. ‘The Changing Landscape of Regional Trade Agreements’, Discussion Paper 8 Geneva: WTO.
Cullet, P. 2001. ‘Plant Variety Protection in Africa: Towards Compliance with the Trips Agreement’, Journal of African Law, 45: 97–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuomo, A. M. 2009. No Rhyme or Reason: The ‘Heads I Win, Tails You Lose’ Bank Bonus Culture. New York: Attorney General of the State ofNew York.Google Scholar
Cutler, A. C. 1995. ‘Global Capitalism and Liberal Myths: Dispute Settlement in Private International Trade Relations’, Millennium, 24: 377–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutler, A. C. 2003. Private Power and Global Authority: Transnational Merchant Law in the Global Political Economy. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daintith, T. C. 1986. ‘The Design and Performance of Long-Term Contracts’, in Daintith, T. C. and Teubner, G. (eds.), Contract and Organisation. Legal Analysis in the Light of Economic and Social Theory, 164–89. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dale, R. 1996. Risk and Regulation in Global Securities Markets. Chichester: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Daly, M. 2005. ‘The WTO and Direct Taxation’, Discussion Papers 9 Geneva: WTO.
Dam, K. W. 2001. ‘Self-Help in the Digital Jungle’, in Dreyfuss, R. C., Zimmerman, D. L. and First, H. (eds.), Expanding the Boundaries of Intellectual Property. Innovation Policy for the Information Society, 103–22. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Das, D. K. 1998. ‘Trade in Financial Services and the Role of the GATS, Against the Backdrop of the Asian Financial Crises’, Journal of World Trade, 32: 80–114.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, P. and David, P. A. 1994. ‘Towards a New Economics of Science’, Research Policy, 23: 487–521.Google Scholar
Daunton, M. 2004. ‘What is Income?’, in Tiley, J. (ed.), Studies in the History of Tax Law, 3–13. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Daunton, M. J. 2001. Trusting Leviathan: The Politics of Taxation in Britain, 1799–1914. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Daunton, M. J. 2002. Just Taxes: The Politics of Taxation in Britain, 1914–1979. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daus, D. G. 1981. ‘New Life in US Patents. The Chakrabarty Case’, European Intellectual Property Review, 7: 194–200.Google Scholar
Davey, W. J. 2001. ‘Has the WTO Dispute Settlement System Exceeded Its Authority? A Consideration of Deference Shown by the System to Member Government Decisions and Its Use of Issue-Avoidance Techniques’, Journal of International Economic Law, 4: 79–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davey, W. J. 2002. ‘A Permanent Panel Body for WTO Dispute Settlement: Desirable or Practical?’, in Kennedy, D. L. M. and Southwick, J. D. (eds.), The Political Economy of International Trade Law. Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec, 496–527. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davey, W. J. 2003. ‘The Case for a Permanent Panel Body’, Journal of International Economic Law, 6: 177–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidow, J. 1981. ‘International Antitrust Codes: The Post-Acceptance Phase’, Antitrust Bulletin, 26: 567–91.Google Scholar
Davies, G. 1994. Copyright and the Public Interest. Weinheim: VCH Publishers.Google Scholar
Davies, H. and Green, D. 2008. Global Financial Regulation. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Davies, L. 2002. ‘Technical Cooperation and the International Coordination of Patentability of Biotechnological Inventions’, Journal of Law and Society, 29: 137–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, W. 2009. Reinventing the Firm. London: Demos.Google Scholar
Davis, C. L. 2003. Food Fights over Free Trade: How International Institutions Promote Agricultural Trade Liberalization. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Deere, C. 2009. The Implementation Game. The TRIPs Agreement and the Global Politics of Intellectual Policy Reform in Developing Countries. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dehousse, R. 1989. ‘1992 and Beyond: The Institutional Dimension of the Internal Market Programme’, Legal Issues of European Integration, 1: 109–36.Google Scholar
Dehousse, R. 1992. ‘Integration v. Regulation? On the Dynamics of Regulation in the European Community’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 30: 383–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delaume, G. 1989. ‘The Myth of the Lex Mercatoria’, Tulane Law Review, 63: 575–611.Google Scholar
Delimatsis, P. 2008. ‘Determining the Necessity of Domestic Regulations in Services. The Best is Yet to Come’, European Journal of International Law, 19: 365–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dell, S. 1990. The United Nations and International Business. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, for UNITAR.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Y. 1996. ‘Between the State, Law, and the Market: The Social and Professional Stakes in the Construction and Definition of a Regulatory Arena’, in Bratton, W., McCahery, J., Picciotto, S. and Scott, C. (eds.), International Regulatory Competition and Coordination, 59–87. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Y. and Garth, B. 1995. ‘Merchants of Law as Moral Entrepreneurs: Constructing International Justice from the Competition for Transnational Business Disputes’, Law and Society Review, 29: 27–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dezalay, Y. and Garth, B. 1996. Dealing in Virtue. International Commercial Arbitration and the Construction of a Transnational Legal Order. Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Y. and Garth, B. 1997. ‘Law, Lawyers, and Social Capital: “Rule of Law” versus Relational Capitalism’, Social and Legal Studies, 6: 109–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dezalay, Y. and Garth, B. 1998. ‘Le “Washington Consensus”. Contribution à une sociologie de l'hégémonie du néolibéralisme’, Actes de la Recherche en sciences sociales, 121–2: 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dezalay, Y. and Garth, B. 2001. The Internationalization of Palace Wars: Lawyers, Economists, and the Contest to Transform Latin American States. University ofChicago Press.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Y. and Garth, B. (eds.) 2002. Global Prescriptions. The Production, Exportation and Importation of a New Legal Orthodoxy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRef
Dezalay, Y. and Garth, B. G. 2008. ‘Law, Lawyers, and Empire’, in Grossberg, M. and Tomlins, C. L. (eds.), The Cambridge History of Law in America. The Twentieth Century and After (1920–), 718–58. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Y. and Garth, B. G. 2010. Asian Legal Revivals: Lawyers in the Shadow of Empire. University ofChicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMaggio, P. (ed.) 2001. The Twenty-First-Century Firm. Changing Economic Organization in International Perspective. Princeton University Press.
Djelic, M.-L. 1998. Exporting the American Model: The Postwar Transformation of European Business. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djelic, M.-L. and Kleiner, T. 2006. ‘The International Competition Network: Moving Towards Transnational Governance’, in Djelic, M.-L. and Sahlin-Anderson, K. (eds.), Transnational Governance: Institutional Dynamics of Regulation, 287–307. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolder, F. 2006. ‘Traditional Knowledge and Patenting: The Experience of the Neemfungicide and the Hoodia Cases’, Biotechnology Law Report, 26: 583–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolzer, R. 1981. ‘New Foundations of the Law of Expropriation of Alien Property’, American Journal of International Law, 75: 553–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolzer, R. and Stevens, M. 1995. Bilateral Investment Treaties. The Hague: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
dos Santos, P. L. 2009. ‘On the Content of Banking in Contemporary Capitalism’, Historical Materialism, 17: 180–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dowd, K. 1998. Beyond Value at Risk. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Dowd, K. and Hutchinson, M. 2010. Alchemists of Loss. How Modern Finance and Government Intervention Crashed the Financial System. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Drache, D. 2000. ‘The Short But Amazingly Significant Life of the ITO. Free Trade and Full Employment: Friends or Foes Forever?’, Toronto (www.yorku.ca/drache/wto.php).
Drache, D. (ed.) 2001. The Market or the Public Domain? Global Governance and the Asymmetry of Power. London: Routledge.
Drahos, P. (ed.) 1999a. Intellectual Property. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Drahos, P. 1999b. ‘Biotechnology Patents, Markets and Morality’, European Intellectual Property Review, 21: 441–9.Google Scholar
Drahos, P. 2007. ‘Four Lessons for Developing Countries from the Trade Negotiations over Access to Medicines’, Liverpool Law Review, 28: 11–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drahos, P. and Braithwaite, J. 2002a. Information Feudalism. Who Owns the Knowledge Economy?London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Drahos, P. and Braithwaite, J. 2002b. ‘Intellectual Property, Corporate Strategy, Globalisation: Trips in Context’, Wisconsin International Law Journal, 20: 451–80.Google Scholar
Drahos, P. and Mayne, R. (eds.) 2002. Global Intellectual Property Rights. Knowledge, Access and Development. Basingstoke: Macmillan for Oxfam.CrossRef
Drake, W. J. and Nicolaïdis, K. 1992. ‘Ideas, Interests, and Institutionalization: “Trade in Services” and the Uruguay Round’, International Organization, 46: 37–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryzek, J. S. 1990. Discursive Democracy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dryzek, J. S. 1999. ‘Transnational Democracy’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 7: 30–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duckworth, A. 1998. ‘STAR Wars: The Colony Strikes Back’, Trust Law International, 12: 16–25.Google Scholar
Duckworth, A. and Matthews, P. 1999. ‘STAR Wars: Smiting the Bull’, Trust Law International, 13: 158–68.Google Scholar
Dulin, A. 2007. ‘Biens mal acquis…profitent trop souvent’, Paris: CCFD (Comité Catholique contre la Faim et pour le Développement).
Dunning, J. H. 1983. ‘Changes in the Level and Structure of International Production: The Last One Hundred Years’, in Casson, M. (ed.), The Growth of International Business, 84–139. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Dunning, J. H. 1988. Explaining International Production. London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Dunning, J. H. 2001a. ‘The Eclectic (OLI) Paradigm of International Production: Past, Present and Future’, International Journal of the Economics of Business, 8: 173–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunning, J. H. 2001b. ‘The Key Literature on IB Activities: 1960–2000’, in Rugman, A. M. and Brewer, T. L. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Business, 36–68. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutfield, G. 2003a. Intellectual Property Rights and the Life Science Industries: A Twentieth Century History. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Dutfield, G. 2003b. Protecting Traditional Knowledge and Folklore. Geneva: ICTSD (International Center for Trade and Sustainable Development).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutfield, G. 2009. Intellectual Property Rights and the Life Science Industries: A Twentieth Century History. London: World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dutton, H. I. 1984. The Patent System and Inventive Activity During the Industrial Revolution 1750–1852. Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Duxbury, N. 1990. ‘Some Radicalism about Realism? Thurman Arnold and the Politics of Modern Jurisprudence’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 10: 11–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyer, A. 1999. ‘International Recognition and Adaptation of Trusts: The Influence of the Hague Convention’, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 32: 989–1013.Google Scholar
Easson, A. J. 2004. Tax Incentives for Foreign Direct Investment. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Easterbrook, F. H. and Fischel, D. R. 1991. The Economic Structure of Corporate Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Eatwell, J. and Taylor, L. 2000. Global Finance at Risk: The Case for International Regulation. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
Ebrill, L., Keen, M., Bodin, J.-P. and Summers, V. 2002. ‘The Allure of the Value-Added Tax’, Finance and Development, 39: 44–7.Google Scholar
,Editorial 2008. ‘The Moody's Blues’, 15 February, Wall Street Journal.
Edwards, L. 2009. ‘The Fall and Rise of Intermediary Liability Online’, in Edwards, L. and Waelde, C. (eds.), Law and the Internet, 47–88. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Effros, R. C. 1982. Emerging Financial Centres. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
Eggers, B. and Mackenzie, R. 2000. ‘The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety’, Journal of International Economic Law, 3: 525–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Egmont 2000. FIUs in Action. 100 Cases from the Egmont Group. Egmont Group (www.egmontgroup.org).
Ehlermann, C.-D. 2000. ‘The Modernization of EC Antitrust Policy: A Legal and Cultural Revolution’, Common Market Law Review, 37: 537–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehlermann, C.-D. 2002. ‘Six Years on the Bench of the “World Trade Court”. Some Personal Experiences as a Member of the Appellate Body of the WTO’, Journal of World Trade, 36: 605–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehlermann, C.-D. 2003. ‘Reflections on the Appellate Body of the WTO’, Journal of International Economic Law, 6: 695–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrlich, C. 1989. Harmonious Alliance: A History of the Performing Right Society. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eisner, M. 1991. Antitrust and the Triumph of Economics. Institutions, Expertise and Policy Change. Chapel Hill, NC: University ofNorth Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Emberland, M. 2006. The Human Rights Of Companies: Exploring The Structure of ECHR Protection. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Enron 2002. Report of Investigation by the Special Investigative Committee of the Board of Directors of Enron Corp.
Epstein, G. A. (ed.) 2005. Financialization and the World Economy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Epstein, R. 1985. Takings. Private Property and the Power of Eminent Domain. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Erturk, I., Froud, J., Johal, S., Leaver, A. and Williams, K. (eds.) 2008. Financialization at Work. Key Texts and Commentary. London: Routledge.
Esanov, A., Raiser, M. and Buiter, W. H. 2001. ‘Nature's Blessing or Nature's Curse: The Political Economy of Transition in Resource-based Economies’, EBRD Working Paper No. 65.
Esserman, S. and Howse, R. 2003. ‘The WTO on Trial’, Foreign Affairs, 82: 130–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esty, D. C. 1994. Greening the GATT. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
,European Commission 2001a. Governance. A White Paper. Brussels.Google Scholar
,European Commission 2001b. Towards an Internal Market without Tax Obstacles. A Strategy for Providing Companies with a Consolidated Corporate Tax Base for Their EU-Wide Activities. Brussels.Google Scholar
,European Commission 2003. Modernising Company Law and Enhancing Corporate Governance in the European Union – A Plan to Move Forward. COM (2003) 284 final.Google Scholar
Evans, G. A. 1999. ‘The Human Genome Project and Public Policy’, Public Understanding of Science, 8: 161–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, P. 1998. Trade, Labour, Global Competition and the Social ClauseDelhi: CUTS International.Google Scholar
Evenett, S. J., Lehmann, A. and Steil, B. (eds.) 2000. Antitrust Goes Global: What Future for Transatlantic Cooperation?London, Washington, DC: Royal Institute of International Affairs;Brookings Institution Press.
Society, Fabian. Commission on Taxation and, C. 2000. Paying for Progress: A New Politics of Tax for Public Spending. London: Fabian Society.Google Scholar
Farrow, T. C. W. 2003. ‘Globalization, International Human Rights, and Civil Procedure’, Alberta Law Review, 41: 671–712.Google Scholar
Faunce, T. 2007. ‘A dubious and secret influence on our public health policy’, 13 June, Melbourne, The Age.
Faundez, J. (ed.) 1997. Good Government and Law. Legal and Institutional Reform in Developing Countries. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Faundez, J., Footer, M. E. and Norton, J. J. 2000. Governance, Development and Globalization: A Tribute to Lawrence Tshuma. London: Blackstone.Google Scholar
Faundez, J. and Picciotto, S. (eds.) 1978. The Nationalization of Multinationals in Peripheral Economies. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRef
Featherstone, M. (ed.) 1990. Global Culture. Nationalism, Globalization and Modernity. London: Sage.
Federico, P. J. 1937. ‘Louis Pasteur's Patents’, Science, 86: 327–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feigenbaum, H. B., Henig, J. R. and Hamnett, C. 1998. Shrinking the State: The Political Underpinnings of Privatization. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felstead, A. 1993. The Corporate Paradox. Power and Control in the Business Franchise. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ferguson, N. 2010. High Financier: The Lives and Time of Siegmund Warburg. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Fidler, D. P., Correa, C. and Aginam, O. 2005. ‘Draft Legal Review of the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) from a Health Policy Perspective’, Geneva: WHO.
Field, C. 2001. ‘Copyright Co-ownership in Cyberspace: The Digital Merger of Content and Technology in Digital Rights Management and E-commerce’, Entertainment and Sports Lawyer, 19: 3–8.Google Scholar
Fieldhouse, D. K. 1978. Unilever Overseas: The Anatomy of a Multinational 1895–1965. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution.Google Scholar
Fieldhouse, D. K. 1986. ‘The Multinational: Critique of a Concept’, in Teichova, A., Levy-Leboyer, M. and Nussbaum, H. (eds.), Multinational Enterprise in Historical Perspective, 9–29. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fine, B. 1999. ‘The Developmental State Is Dead: Long Live Social Capital?’, Development and Change, 30: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fink, C. and Correa, C. M. 2009. ‘The Global Debate on the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights and Developing Countries’, Geneva: ICTSD (International Center for Trade and Sustainable Development).
Finnemore, M. and Toope, S. J. 2001. ‘Alternatives to “Legalization”: Richer Views of Law and Politics’, International Organization, 55: 743–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer-Lescano, A. and Teubner, G. 2004. ‘Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law’, Michigan Journal of International Law, 25: 999–1046.Google Scholar
Fisher, E. 2007. Risk Regulation and Administrative Constitutionalism. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Fisher, W. F. and Ponniah, T. 2003. Another World Is Possible: Popular Alternatives to Globalization at the World Social Forum. Nova Scotia: Fernwood Pub. and London: Zed Press.Google Scholar
Fitzpatrick, P. 1984. ‘Law and Societies’, Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 22: 115–38.Google Scholar
Fjeldstad, O.-H. and Rakner, L. 2003. ‘Taxation and Tax Reforms in Developing Countries: Illustrations from Sub-Saharan Africa’, Bergen: Chr. Michelsen Institute Development Studies and Human Rights.
Fjeldstad, O.-H. and Therkildsen, O. 2008. ‘Mass Taxation and State–Society Relations in East Africa’, in Bräutigam, D., Fjeldstad, O.-H. and Moore, M. (eds.), Taxation and State-Building in Developing Countries. Capacity and Consent, 114–34. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming Jr., J. C., Peroni, R. J. and Shay, S. E. 2009. ‘Worse than Exemption’, Emory Law Journal, 59: 79–149.Google Scholar
Flett, J.2011. ‘Importing Other International Régimes into WTO Litigation’, in Young, M. (ed.), Régime Interaction in International Law. Cambridge University Press.
Fligstein, N. 1990. The Transformation of Corporate Control. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fligstein, N. 2001. The Architecture of Markets. An Economic Sociology of Twenty-First-Century Capitalist Societies. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Flood, J. and Skordaki, E. 1997. ‘Normative Bricolage: Informal Rule-Making by Accountants and Lawyers in Mega-Insolvencies’, in Teubner, G. (ed.), Global Law Without A State, 109–31. Aldershot: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
Fox, E. M. 2003. ‘International Antitrust and the Doha Dome’, Virginia Journal of International Law, 43: 911–32.Google Scholar
Fox, H. 2002. The Law of State Immunity. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Franck, S. 2009. ‘Developments and Outcomes of Investment Treaty Arbitration’, Harvard Journal of International Law, 50: 435–89.Google Scholar
Franck, T. M. 1990. The Power of Legitimacy Among Nations. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Freedeman, C. E. 1979. Joint-Stock Enterprise in France, 1807–1867: From Privileged Company to Modern Corporation. Chapel Hill, NC: University ofNorth Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Freedeman, C. E. 1993. The Triumph of Corporate Capitalism in France 1867–1914. University ofRochester Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, J. 2000. ‘The Contracting State’, Florida State University Law Review, 28: 155–214.Google Scholar
Freeman, J. 2003. ‘Extending Public Law Norms Through Privatization’, Harvard Law Review, 116: 1285–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
French, K. R. 2008. ‘Presidential Address: The Costs of Active Investing’, Journal of Finance, 63: 1537–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freyer, T. 1992. Regulating Big Business. Antitrust in Great Britain and America 1880–1990. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fridd, P. and Sainsbury, J. 1999. ‘The Role of Voluntary Codes of Conduct and Regulation: A Retailers View’, in Picciotto, S. and Mayne, R. (eds.), Regulating International Business: Beyond Liberalization, 221–34. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froomkin, A. M. 2003. ‘[email protected]: Towards a Critical Theory of Cyberspace’, Harvard Law Review, 116: 749–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frynas, J. G. 2000. Oil in Nigeria. Conflict and Litigation between Oil Companies and Village Communities. Hamburg: LIT Verlag.Google Scholar
Fuest, C. 2008. ‘The European Commission's Proposal for a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 24: 720–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuks, I. 2006. ‘Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain and the Future of ATCA Litigation: Examining Bonded Labor Claims and Corporate Liability’, Columbia Law Review, 106: 112–43.Google Scholar
,G30 2008. The Structure of Financial Supervision. Approaches and Challenges in a Global Marketplace. Group of Thirty.Google Scholar
Gaillard, Y. 2010. La politique du livre face au défi du numérique. Rapport d'information N° 338. Paris: French Senate, Commission des Finances.Google Scholar
Galanter, M. 2002. ‘Law's Elusive Promise: Learning from Bhopal’, in Likosky, M. (ed.), Transnational Legal Processes. Globalisation and Power Disparities, 172–85. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Gallagher, K. P. and Birch, M. B. L. 2006. ‘Do Investment Agreements Attract Investment? Evidence from Latin America’, Journal of World Investment and Trade, 7: 961–74.Google Scholar
Gallagher, R. 1990. Report of Mr Rodney Gallagher of Coopers and Lybrand on the Survey of Offshore Finance Sectors in the Caribbean Dependent Territories, 1989–90, No. 121. London: House of Commons.Google Scholar
Gallagher, T. 2001. ‘Copyright Compulsory Licensing and Incentives’: Oxford Intellectual Property Research Centre Working Paper Series No. 2.
Ganghof, S. 2006. The Politics of Income Taxation: A Comparative Analysis. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Gapper, J. and Denton, N. 1996. All That Glitters. The Fall of Barings. London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
Gardner, R. N. [1956] 1980. Sterling-Dollar Diplomacy in Current Perspective. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Genschel, P. 2002. ‘Globalization, Tax Competition, and the Welfare State’, Politics and Society, 30: 245–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, S. 2004. Another World Is Possible If…London: Verso Books in association with TNI.Google Scholar
Gerber, D. 1998. Law and Competition in Twentieth Century Europe. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gereffi, G. 2001. ‘Shifting Governance Structures in Global Commodity Chains, with Special Reference to the Internet’, American Behavioral Scientist, 44: 1616–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gereffi, G. and Korzeniewicz, M. (eds.) 1994. Commodity Chains and Global Capitalism. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Gerstenberger, H. and Welke, U. (eds.) 2002. Seefahrt im Zeichen der GlobalisierungMunster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.
Gervais, D. 2008. The TRIPs Agreement. London: Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar
Gervais, D. (ed.) 2010. Collective Management of Copyright and Related Rights. Alphen: Kluwer.
Gessner, V. and Nelken, D. (eds.) 2007. European Ways of Law. Towards a European Sociology of Law. Oxford: Hart.
Ghai, Y. and Choong, T. C. 1988. Management Contracts and Public Enterprises in Developing Countries. International Center for Public Enterprises in Developing Countries.Google Scholar
Ghijsen, H. 2009. ‘Intellectual Property Rights and Access Rules for Germplasm: Benefit or Straitjacket?’, Euphytica, 170: 229–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gianviti, F. 1998. ‘International Convergence and the Role of the IMF’, in Andenas, M. (ed.), Transnational (Corporate) Finance and the Challenge to the Law, London: Hart Legal Workshop.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. (ed.) 2008. Patenting Lives. Life Patents, Culture and Development. Aldershot: Ashgate-Dartmouth.
Gilbert, C. L. 1996. ‘International Commodity Agreements: An Obituary Notice’, World Development, 24: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, S. 2003. Power and Resistance in the New World Order. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Gilmore, W. C. 1995. Dirty Money. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Gilson, R. J. 2001. ‘Globalizing Corporate Governance: Convergence of Form or Function’, American Journal of Comparative Law, 49: 329–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glasbeek, H. 2002. Between the Lines. Toronto: Between the Lines.Google Scholar
Glasson, J. and Thomas, G. (eds.) 2006. The International Trust. London: Jordans.
Glenn, H. P. 2000. Legal Traditions of the World. Sustainable Diversity in Law. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Glimstedt, H. 2001. ‘Between National and International Governance: Geopolitics, Strategizing Actors, and Sector Coordination in Electrical Engineering in the Interwar Era’, in Morgan, G., Kristensen, P. H. and Whitley, R. (eds.), The Multinational Firm: Organizing across Institutional and National Divides, 125–52. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Glinski, C. 2007. ‘Corporate Codes of Conduct: Moral or Legal Obligation?’, in McBarnet, D., Voiculescu, A. and Campbell, T. (eds.), The New Corporate Accountability. Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law, 119–47. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gold, P. H.1981–3. ‘Legal Problems in Expanding the Scope of GATT to Include Trade in Services’, International Trade Law Journal, 7: 281–305.
Goldfrank, B. and Schneider, A. 2006. ‘Competitive Institution Building: The PT and Participatory Budgeting in Rio Grande do Sul’, Latin American Politics and Society, 48: 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, J. L. and Wu, T. 2006. Who Controls the Internet?: Illusions of a Borderless World. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldstein, J. 1993. ‘Creating the GATT Rules: Politics, Institutions and American Policy’, in Ruggie, J. G. (ed.), Multilateralism Matters: The Theory and Practice of an Institutional Form, 201–32. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Goldstein, J., Kahler, M., Keohane, R. O. and Slaughter, A.-M. (eds.) 2001. Legalization and World Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Goldstein, J. and Martin, L. L. 2000. ‘Legalization, Trade Liberalization, and Domestic Politics: A Cautionary Note’, International Organization, 54: 603–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, M. and Turner, P. 1996. ‘Banking Crises in Emerging Economies: Origins and Policy Options’, Basel: BIS Economic Papers No. 46.
Goldstein, P. 1994. Copyright's Highway. From Gutenberg to the Celestial Jukebox. New York: Hill & Wang.Google Scholar
Goldstein, P. 2001. International Copyright: Principles, Law, and Practice. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Golob, S. R. 2003. ‘Beyond the Policy Frontier: Canada, Mexico, and the Ideological Origins of NAFTA’, World Politics, 55: 361–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, R. W. 1984. ‘“The Ideal and the Actual in the Law”: Fantasies and Practices of New York City Lawyers, 1870–1910’, in Gawalt, G. W. (ed.), The New High Priests: Lawyers in Post-Civil War America, 53–74. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Gough, I. 1979. The Political Economy of the Welfare State. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Governor of the Bank of England. 1973. ‘Multinational Enterprises’, Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, 13: 184–92.Google Scholar
Graber, C. B. and Burri-Nenova, M. (eds.) 2008. Intellectual Property and Traditional Cultural Expressions in a Digital Environment. Cheltenham: E. Elgar.CrossRef
Grandin, G. 2009. Fordlandia: The Rise and Fall of Henry Ford's Forgotten Jungle City. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Grandy, C. 1989. ‘New Jersey Corporate Chartermongering, 1875–1929’, Journal of Economic History, 49: 677–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granovetter, M. and Swedberg, E. (eds.) 1992. The Sociology of Economic Life. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Graubart, J. 2008. Legalizing Transnational Activism: The Struggle to Gain Social Change from NAFTA's Citizen Petitions. Philadelphia: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Greenwald, J. 2003. ‘WTO Dispute Settlement: An Exercise in Trade Law Legislation?’, Journal of International Economic Law, 6: 113–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groom, A. J. R. and Taylor, P. (eds.) 1990. Frameworks for International Cooperation. London: Pinter.
Grubb, P. W. 1999. Patents for Chemicals, Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology. Fundamentals of Global Law, Practice and Strategy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Guermazi, B. 2004. ‘Reforming International Accounting Rates: A Developing Country Perspective’, in Geradin, D. and Luff, D. (eds.), The WTO and Global Convergence in Telecommunications and Audio-Visual Services. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Guex, S. 1999. ‘Les origines du secret bancaire suisse et son rôle dans la politique de la Confédération au sortir de la Seconde Guerre mondiale’, Genèses, 34: 4–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guex, S. 2007. ‘1932: l'affaire des fraudes fiscales et le gouvernement Herriot’, L'Economie politique, 89–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gugl, E. and Zodrow, G. R. 2006. ‘International Tax Competition and Tax Incentives for Developing Countries’, in Alm, J., Martínez-Vázquez, J. and Rider, M. (eds.), Challenges of Tax Reform in a Global Economy, 167–82. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Gugler, K., Mueller, D. C. and Yurtoglu, B. B. 2004. ‘Corporate Governance and Globalization’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 20: 129–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guisinger, S. E. 1985. Investment Incentives and Performance Requirements. Patterns of International Trade, Production and Investment. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Gunningham, N. 1991. ‘Private Ordering, Self-Regulation and Futures Markets: A Comparative Study of Informal Social Control’, Law and Policy, 13: 297–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunningham, N. and Grabosky, P. 1998. Smart Regulation: Designing Environmental Policy. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Gupta, A. K. 2005. WIPO–UNEP Study on the Role of Intellectual Property Rights in the Sharing of Benefits Arising from the Use of Biological Resources and Associated Traditional Knowledge. Study No. 4. Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organisation.Google Scholar
Gupta, A. S. 2007. ‘Determinants of Tax Revenue Efforts in Developing Countries’, Working Paper No. 07/184 Washington, DC: IMF.
Guzman, A. T. 1998. ‘Why LDCs Sign Treaties that Hurt Them: Explaining the Popularity of Bilateral Investment Treaties’, Virginia Journal of International Law, 38: 639–88.Google Scholar
Haas, E. B. 1964. Beyond the Nation-State: Functionalism and International Organization. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Haas, P. M. 1992. ‘Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination’, International Organization, 46: 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J. 1996. ‘Three Normative Models of Democracy’, in Benhabib, S. (ed.), Democracy and Difference. Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, 21–30. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 2001. The Postnational Constellation. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Hadden, T. 1984. ‘Inside Corporate Groups’, International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 12: 271–86.Google Scholar
Hadden, T. 1993. ‘Regulating Corporate Groups: An International Perspective’, in McCahery, J., Picciotto, S. and Scott, C. (eds.), Corporate Control and Accountability, 343–69. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Haley, J. O. 2001. Antitrust in Germany and Japan, the First Fifty Years, 1947–1998. University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Hall, P. A. and Soskice, D. W. 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, T. C. and Carruthers, B. G. 2009. Bankrupt. Global Lawmaking and Systemic Financial Crisis. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Halverson, J. T. 1991. ‘Antitrust in a Global Environment: Conflicts and Resolutions: Harmonization and Coordination of International Merger Procedures’, Antitrust Law Journal, 60: 531–42.Google Scholar
Hamilton, S. 2003. ‘Putting the Client First: The Emerging Copernican Revolution of Tax Administration’, Tax Notes International Magazine, 29: 569–76.Google Scholar
Hampton, M. P. 1996. The Offshore Interface. Tax Havens in the Global Economy. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Handtke, C. and Towse, R. 2007. ‘Economics of Copyright Collecting Societies’, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 38: 937–57.Google Scholar
Hansmann, H. and Kraakman, R. 2001. ‘The End of History for Corporate Law’, Georgetown Law Journal, 89: 439–68.Google Scholar
Harashima, Y. 2008. ‘Trade and Environment Negotiations in the WTO: Asian Perspectives’, International Environmental Agreements, 8: 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, G. 1968. ‘The Tragedy of the Commons’, Science (new series), 162: 1243–8.Google ScholarPubMed
Hardin, G. 1998. ‘Extensions of “The Tragedy of the Commons”’, Science (new series), 280: 682–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardt, M. and Negri, A. 2000. Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hardt, M. and Negri, A. 2005. Multitude. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Harlow, C. 1999. ‘European Administrative Law and the Global Challenge’, in Craig, P. and Búrca, G. (eds.), The Evolution of EU Law, 261–85. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, P. 2006. Income Tax in Common Law Jurisdictions: From The Origins to 1820. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, B. 1994. Lean and Mean: The Changing Landscape of Corporate Power in the Age of Flexibility. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Harvey, C. and Press, J. 1990 ‘The City and International Mining’, Business History, 32: 98–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haufler, V. 2001. A Public Role for the Private Sector. Industry Self-Regulation in a Global Economy. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
Hawley, E. J. 1966. The New Deal and the Problem of Monopoly. A Study in Economic Ambivalence. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hawley, J. P. 1984. ‘Protecting Capital from Itself: US Attempts to Regulate the Eurocurrency System’, International Organization, 38: 131–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawley, J. P. 1987. Dollars and Borders: US Government Attempts to Restrict Capital Flows, 1960–1980. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Hay, P. 1986. ‘Refining Personal Jurisdiction in the United States’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 35: 32–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, R. J. 2006. ‘OECD Level Playing Field Report: Consensus or Conflict?’, Tax Planning International Review, 33: 3–10.Google Scholar
Hayden, C. 2003. ‘From Market to Market: Bioprospecting's Idioms of Inclusion’, American Ethnologist, 30: 359–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayden, C. 2004. ‘Prospecting's Publics’, in Humphrey, C. and Verdery, K. (eds.), Property in Question. Value Transformation in the Global Economy, 115–38. London: Berg.Google Scholar
Hayton, D. J. (ed.) 2002. Extending the Boundaries of Trusts and Similar Ring-fenced Funds. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
Hedlund, G. 1986. ‘The Hypermodern MNC – A Heterarchy?’, Human Resource Management, 25: 9–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heilbrunn, J. R. 2005. ‘Oil and Water? Elite Politicians and Corruption in France’, Comparative Politics, 37: 277–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Held, D. 1995. Democracy and the Global Order. From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Held, D. 1997. ‘Cosmopolitan Democracy and the Global Order: A New Agenda’, in Bohman, J. and Lutz-Bachman, M. (eds.), Perpetual Peace, 235–51. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Held, D., McGrew, A., Goldblatt, D. and Perraton, J. 1999. Global Transformations. Politics and Culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Helfer, L. R. 1998. ‘Adjudicating Copyright Claims under the TRIPs Agreement. The Case for a European Human Rights Analogy’, Harvard International Law Journal, 39: 357.Google Scholar
Helfer, L. R. 2000. ‘World Music on a US Stage: A Berne/TRIPs and Economic Analysis of the Fairness in Music Licensing Act’, Boston University Law Review, 80: 93–204.Google Scholar
Helfer, L. R. 2004. Intellectual Property Rights in Plant Varieties International Legal Regimes and Policy Options for National Governments. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.Google Scholar
Helfer, L. R., Alter, K. J. and Guerzovich, M. F. 2009. ‘Islands of Effective International Adjudication: Constructing an Intellectual Property Rule of Law in the Andean Community’, American Journal of International Law, 103: 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helfer, L. R. and Slaughter, A.-M. 1997. ‘Toward a Theory of Effective Supranational Adjudication’, Yale Law Journal, 107: 273–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helleiner, E. 1995. ‘Explaining the Globalization of Financial Markets: Bringing States Back In’, Review of International Political Economy, 2: 315–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heller, M. A. and Eisenberg, R. S. 1998. ‘Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research’, Science, 280: 698–701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hellerstein, W. and McClure, C. 2004. ‘The European Commission's Report on Company Income Taxation. What the EU Can Learn from the Experience of the United States’, International Tax and Public Finance, 11: 199–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, A., Gentle, I. and Ball, E. 2005. ‘WTO Principles and Telecommunications in Developing Nations: Challenges and Consequences of Accession’, Telecommunications Policy, 29: 205–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, D. 1999. The MAI Affair. A Story and Its Lessons. London: Royal Institute of International Affairs.Google Scholar
Herring, R. J. and Litan, R. E. 1995. Financial Regulation in the Global Economy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Heyvaert, V. 1999. ‘Reconceptualizing Risk Assessment’, Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 8: 135–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heywood, M. 2001. ‘Debunking Conglomo-talk: A Case Study of the Amicus Curiae as an Instrument for Advocacy, Investigation and Mobilisation’, ‘Health, Law and Human Rights: Exploring the Connections’, an international cross-disciplinary conference honoring Jonathan M. Mann, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Hildebrand, P. M. 2008. ‘Is Basel II Enough? The Benefits of a Leverage Ratio’, Financial Markets Group Lecture, London School of Economics, London, 15 December 2008. Speech by Mr Philipp M. Hildebrand, Vice-Chairman of the Governing Board of the Swiss National Bank.
Hilferding, R. [1910] 1981. Finance Capital. A Study of the Latest Phase of Capitalist Development. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hirsch, P., Michaels, S. and Friedman, R. 1990. ‘Clean Models vs Dirty Hands: Why Economics is Different from Sociology’, in Zukin, S. and DiMaggio, P. (eds.), Structures of Capital: The Social Organization of the Economy, 39–56. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hirst, P. and Thompson, G. 1996. Globalization in Question. The International Economy and the Possibilities of Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, E. J. 1990. Nations and Nationalism since 1780. Programme, Myth, Reality. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A. 1915. Towards International Government. London: Geo. Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. M. 2003. ‘Disappearing Taxes or the “Race to the Middle”? Fiscal Policy in the OECD’, in Weiss, L. (ed.), States in the Global Economy. Bringing Domestic Institutions Back In, 37–57. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgkin, T. L. 1956. Nationalism in colonial Africa. London: Frederick Muller.Google Scholar
Hope, J. 2008. Biobazaar: The Open Source Revolution and Biotechnology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horlick, G. N. and Meyer, M. A. 1995. ‘The International Convergence of Antitrust Policy’, International Lawyer, 29: 65–76.Google Scholar
Horn, N. and Kocka, J. (eds.) 1979. Law and the Formation of the Big Enterprises in the 19th Century. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.
Houlder, V. 2007. ‘Offshore amnesty swells UK tax coffers by £400m’, 6 December, Financial Times.
Hounshell, D. A. 1985. From the American System to Mass Production 1800–1932. The Development of Manufacturing Technology in the United States. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Hovenkamp, H. 1991. Enterprise and American Law 1836–1937. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howse, R. 2000. ‘Managing the Interface Between International Trade Law and the Regulatory State: What Lessons Should (and Should Not) be Drawn from the Jurisprudence of the US Dormant Commerce Clause’, in Cottier, T. and Mavroidis, P. C. (eds.), Regulatory Barriers and the Principle of Non-Discrimination in Trade Law, 139–70. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Howse, R. 2002. ‘From Politics to Technocracy – And Back Again: The Fate of the Multilateral Trading Regime’, American Journal of International Law, 96: 94–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howse, R. 2004. Mainstreaming the Right to Development into International Trade Law and Policy at the World Trade Organization. E/CN.4/Sub.2/2004/17. UN Commission on Human Rights, Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights.
Hu, H. T. C. 1980. ‘Compensation in Expropriations: A Preliminary Economic Analysis’, Virginia Journal of International Law, 20: 61–95.Google Scholar
Huault, I. and Rainelli-Le Montagner, H. 2009. ‘Market Shaping as an Answer to Ambiguities: The Case of Credit Derivatives’, Organization Studies, 30: 549–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudec, R. E. 1975. The GATT Legal System and World Trade Diplomacy. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Hudec, R. E. 1987. Developing Countries in the GATT Legal System. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
Hudec, R. E. 1993. Enforcing International Trade Law. Evolution of the GATT Dispute-Settlement System. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Hudson, A. 2009. The Law of Finance. London: Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar
Huertas, T. F. 1990. ‘US Multinational Banking: History and Prospects’, in Jones, G. (ed.), Banks as Multinationals, 249–65. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hugenholtz, B., Guibault, L. and Geffen, S. v. 2003. The Future of Levies in a Digital Environment. Amsterdam: Institute for Information Law.Google Scholar
,Human Genome Sciences. 2008. Annual Report.
Huxley, A. 2000. ‘Rhodes, Arakan, Cayman, Grand: Three Versions of Offshore’, in Edge, I. (ed.), Comparative Law in Global Perspective: Essays in Celebration of the Fiftieth Anniversary of the Founding of the SOAS Law Department, 145–70. Ardsley, NY: Transnational Publishers.Google Scholar
Huys, I., Berthels, N., Matthijs, G. and Overwalle, G. 2009. ‘Legal Uncertainty in the Area of Genetic Diagnostic Testing’, Nature Biotechnology, 27: 903–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hymer, S. [1960] 1976. The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Investment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hymer, S. 1972. ‘The Multinational Corporation and Uneven Development’, in Kapoor, A. and Grub, P. D. (eds.), The Multinational Enterprise in Transition, 438–56. Princeton, NJ: Darwin.Google Scholar
,IADB 2004. Integration and Trade in the Americas. Fiscal Impact of Trade Liberalization in the Americas. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
,IFRRO 2008. Copyright Levies and Reprography. International Federation of Reproduction Rights Organizations.Google Scholar
Iida, K. 2006. Legalization and Japan: The Politics of WTO Dispute Settlement. London: Cameron May.Google Scholar
,IISD 2010. Summary of the 9th Meeting of the Working Group on ABS of the CBD. Earth Negotiations Bulletin 503. International Institute for Sustainable Development.Google Scholar
,ILC 2006. Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law. A/CN.4/L.702. New York: Study Group of the International Law Commission.Google Scholar
,International Labour Organization 1994. The Social Dimensions of the Liberalization of World Trade. GB.261/WP/SLD/1. Geneva: ILO Working party on the Social Dimensions of the Liberalization of International Trade.Google Scholar
,International Labour Organization 1998. Overview of Global Developments and Office Activities Concerning Codes of Conduct, Social Labelling and Other Private Sector Initiatives Addressing Labour Issues. GB.273/WP/SDL/1(Rev.1). Geneva: ILO Working Party on the Social Dimensions of the Liberalization of International Trade.Google Scholar
,International Labour Organization 1999. Further Examination of Questions Concerning Private Initiatives, Including Codes of Conduct. GB.274/WP/SDL/1. Geneva: ILO Working Party on the Social Dimensions of the Liberalization of International Trade.Google Scholar
,International Labour Organization 2003a. Employment and Social Policy in Respect of Export Processing Zones (EPZs). GB.286/ESP/3, 286th Session. Geneva: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
,International Labour Organization 2003b. Information Note on Corporate Social Responsibility and International Labour Standards. GB.286/WP/SDG/4. Geneva: ILOWorking Party on the Social Dimension of Globalization.Google Scholar
,International Labour Organization 2004. A Fair Globalization: Creating Opportunities for All. Geneva: World Commission on the Social Dimension of Globalization.Google Scholar
,International Labour Organization 2008. Declaration on Social Justice for a Fair Globalization.
,ILO and WTO 2007. Trade and Employment: Challenges for Policy Research. Geneva: International Labour Office and Secretariat of the World Trade Organization.Google Scholar
,International Monetary Fund 2009. The State of Public Finances: Outlook and Medium-Term Policies After the 2008 Crisis. Washington, DC: IMF Fiscal Affairs Department.Google Scholar
,IMF–IEO 2005. Report on the Evaluation of the IMF's Approach to Capital Account Liberalization. Washington, DC: IMF Independent Evaluation Office.Google Scholar
Ingham, G. 1994. ‘States and Markets in the Production of World Money’, in Corbridge, S., Thrift, N. and Martin, R. (eds.), Money, Power and Space, 29–49. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ireland, P. 1996. ‘Capitalism without the Capitalist: The Joint Stock Company Share and the Emergence of the Modern Doctrine of Separate Legal Personality’, Legal History, 17: 40–72.Google Scholar
Ireland, P. 2003a. ‘Property and Contract in Contemporary Corporate Theory’, Legal Studies, 23: 453–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ireland, P. 2003b. ‘Property, Private Government and the Myth of Deregulation’, in Worthington, S. (ed.), Commercial Law and Commercial Practice, 85–113. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Ireland, P. 2008. ‘Limited Liability, Shareholder Rights and the Problem of Corporate Irresponsibility’, Cambridge Journal of Economics. Advanced access online doi:10.1093/cje/ben040.CrossRef
Ireland, P. 2009. ‘Financialization and Corporate Governance’, Northern Ireland Legal Quarterly, 60(1), 1.Google Scholar
,International Transport Federation 2005. Campaign against Flags of Convenience and Substandard Shipping. Annual Report 2004. International Transport Workers' Federation.Google Scholar
Jackson, H. E. 1998. ‘The Selective Incorporation of Foreign Legal Systems to Promote Nepal as an International Financial Services Centre’, in McCrudden, C. (ed.), Regulation and Deregulation – Policy and Practice in the Utilities and Financial Services Industries, 367–408. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. H. 1997. The World Trading System. Law and Policy of International Economic Relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. H. 2004. ‘International Law Status of WTO Dispute Settlement Reports: Obligation to Comply or Option to “Buy Out”?’, American Journal of International Law, 98: 109–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, M. 2001. ‘Using Technology to Circumvent the Law: The DMCA's Push to Privatize Copyright’, Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal, 23: 607–46.Google Scholar
Jackson, P., Furfine, C., Groeneveld, H., Hancock, D., Jones, D., Perraudin, W., Radecki, L. and Yoneyama, M. 1999. ‘Capital Requirements and Bank Behaviour: The Impact of the Basle Accord’, Working Papers 1, Basel: Basel Committee on Banking Supervision.
Jackson, R. H. 1990. Quasi-States: Sovereignty, International Relations and the Third World. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jawara, F. and Kwa, A. 2004. Behind the Scenes at the WTO. The Real World of Trade Negotiations. Lessons of Cancun, updated edition. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Jayaprakash, N. D. 1990. ‘Perilous Litigation: The Leak Disaster Case’, Economic and Political Weekly, 22 December, 2761–66.Google Scholar
Jayaprakash, N. D. 1993. ‘Plight of Bhopal Gas Victims’, Economic and Political Weekly, 1 May, 838.Google Scholar
Jeffreys, D. 2004. Aspirin. The Remarkable Story of a Wonder Drug. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Jehoram, H. C. 2001. ‘The Future of Copyright Collecting Societies’, European Intellectual Property Review, 23: 134–9.Google Scholar
Jenkins, R. 1987. Transnational Corporations and Uneven Development. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Jenkins, R. 2002. ‘The Political Economy of Codes of Conduct’, in Jenkins, R., Pearson, R. and Seyfang, G. (eds.), Corporate Responsibility and Labour Rights. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Jenkins, R., Pearson, R. and Seyfang, G. (eds.) 2002. Corporate Responsibility and Labour Rights. London: Earthscan.
Jenks, C. W. 1958. The Common Law of Mankind. London: Stevens.Google Scholar
Jensen, N. and Wantchekon, L. 2004. ‘Resource Wealth and Political Regimes in Africa’, Comparative Political Studies, 37: 816–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jessop, B. 1982. The Capitalist State: Marxist Theories and Methods. Oxford: Robertson.Google Scholar
Jessup, P. C. 1956. Transnational Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Joelson, M. R. 1976. ‘The Proposed International Codes of Conduct as Related to Restrictive Business Practices’, Law and Policy in International Business, 8: 837–45.Google Scholar
Joerges, C. 1990. ‘Paradoxes of Deregulatory Strategies at Community Level: The Example of Product Safety Policy’, in Majone, G. (ed.), Deregulation or Re-regulation? Regulatory Reform in Europe and the United States, 176–97. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Joerges, C. 1999. ‘Bureaucratic Nightmare, Technocratic Regime and the Dream of Good Transnational Governance’, in Joerges, C. and Vos, E. (eds.), EU Committees: Social Regulation, Law and Politics, 3–47. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Joerges, C. 2001. ‘Law, Science and the Management of Risks to Health at the National, European and International Level – Stories on Baby Dummies, Mad Cows and Hormones in Beef’, Columbia Journal of European Law, 7: 1–19.Google Scholar
Joerges, C. 2007. Conflict of Laws as Constitutional Form. Reflections on the International Trade Law and the Biotech Panel Report. RECON Online Working Paper 2007/03.Google Scholar
Joerges, C. and Neyer, J. 1997. ‘From Intergovernmental Bargaining to Deliberative Political Processes: The Constitutionalisation of Comitology’, European Law Journal, 3: 273–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joerges, C. and Neyer, J. 2003. ‘Politics, Risk Management, World Trade Organization Governance and the Limits of Legalisation’, Science and Public Policy, 30: 219–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C. A. 1987. International Business in the Nineteenth Century: The Rise and Fall of a Cosmopolitan Bourgeoisie. Brighton: Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Jones, G. (ed.) 1990. Banks as Multinationals. London: Routledge.
Jordan, R. S. (ed.) 1971. International Administration. Its Evolution and Contemporary Applications. OxfordUniversity Press.
Joyner, D. H. 2004. ‘Restructuring the Multilateral Export Control Regime System’, Journal of Conflict and Security Law, 9: 181–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jülich, R. and Falk, H. 1999. ‘The Integration of Voluntary Approaches into Existing Legal Systems. Literature Survey’: CAVA 99/09/4.
Justice, D. W. 2002. ‘The International Trade Union Movement and the New Codes of Conduct’, in Jenkins, R., Pearson, R. and Seyfang, G. (eds.), Corporate Responsibility and Labour Rights. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Kagan, R. A. (2007). ‘Globalization and Legal Change: The “Americanization” of European Law?’, Regulation and Governance, 1: 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn-Freund, O. 1974. ‘On Uses and Misuses of Comparative Law’, Modern Law Review, 37: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalderimis, D. 2004. ‘IMF Conditionality as Investment Regulation: A Theoretical Analysis’, Social and Legal Studies, 13: 103–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. [1795] 1966. ‘Toward Perpetual Peace’, in Gregor, M. J. (ed.), Practical Philosophy, 311–51. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kapczynski, A., Chaifetz, S., Katz, Z. and Benkler, Y. 2005. ‘Addressing Global Health Inequities: An Open Licensing Approach For University Innovations’, Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 20: 1031–114.Google Scholar
Kaplow, L. and Shavell, S. 1996. ‘Property Rules versus Liability Rules: An Economic Analysis’, Harvard Law Review, 109: 713–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kapstein, E. B. 1994. Governing the Global Economy. International Finance and the State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kar, D. and Cartwright-Smith, D. 2008. Illicit Financial Flows From Developing Countries: 2002–2006. Washington, DC: Global Financial Integrity (GFI).Google Scholar
Kar, D., Cartwright-Smith, D. and Hollingshead, A. 2010. The Absorption of Illicit Financial Flows from Developing Countries: 2002–2006. Washington, DC: GFI.Google Scholar
Kassim, H. and Wright, K. 2009. ‘Bringing Regulatory Processes Back In: The Reform of EU Antitrust and Merger Control’, West European Politics, 32: 738–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kassoulides, G. C. 1993. Port State Control and Jurisdiction. The Evolution of the Port State Regime. Dordrecht: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Kaufman, H. 2008. ‘The principles of sound regulation’, 5 August, Financial Times.
Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A. and Mastruzzi, M. 2005. Measuring Governance Using Cross-Country Perceptions Data. World Bank.Google Scholar
Kaul, I., Grunberg, I. and Stern, M. A. (eds.) 1999. Global Public Goods. International Cooperation in the 21st Century. www.undp.org/globalpublicgoods: Oxford University Press.
Kawamoto, A. 1999. ‘How Can Regulatory Reform be Linked to the New Trade Round? Perspectives from the OECD Regulatory Reform Country Reviews’, International Trade Law Review, (5) 124–30, (6) 58–63.Google Scholar
Kearney, N. 1999. ‘Corporate Codes of Conduct: The Privatized Application of Labour Standards’, in Picciotto, S. and Mayne, R. (eds.), Regulating International Business. Beyond Liberalization, 205–20. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keck, M. E. and Sikkink, K. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders. Advocacy Networks in International Politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Keen, M., Kim, K. and Varsano, R. 2006. ‘The “Flat Tax(es)”: Principles and Evidence’, Working Paper No. 06/218 IMF.
Kell, G. 2003. ‘The Global Compact. Origins, Operations, Progress, Challenges’, Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 11: 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellerman, C., Rixen, T. and Uhl, S. 2007. Europeanizing Corporate Taxation to Regain National Tax Policy Autonomy. www.fes.de: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.Google Scholar
Kelsey, J. 1995. Economic Fundamentalism. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Kelsey, J. 2008. Serving Whose Interests? The Political Economy of Trade in Services Agreements. Abingdon: Routledge-Cavendish.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, R. 2009. ‘Open Source Software: An Introduction’, Computer Law and Security Report, 24: 77–85.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. 1986. ‘Primitive Legal Scholarship’, Harvard International Law Journal, 27: 1–98.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. 2005. ‘Challenging Expert Rule: The Politics of Global Governance’, Sydney Law Review, 27: 5–28.Google Scholar
Kenyon, W. 2009. ‘Companies need a culture change to escape bribery prosecutions’, 19 November, Financial Times.
Kerf, M., Neto, I. and Géradin, D. 2005. ‘Controlling Market Power: Balancing Antitrust and Sector Regulation in Telecoms’, Private Sector Development, Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Kernochan, J. M. 1985. ‘Music Performance Rights Organizations in the United States of America: Special Characteristics, Restraints, and Public Attitudes’, Copyright, 21: 389–410.Google Scholar
Kersting, C. 2002. ‘Corporate Choice of Law – A Comparison of the United States and European Systems and a Proposal for a European Directive’, Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 28: 1–75.Google Scholar
Kimenyi, M. S. 2005. ‘Efficiency and Efficacy of Kenya's Constituency Development Fund: Theory and Evidence’, Working Paper 2005–42 Storrs: University of Connecticut Department of Economics.
Kindleberger, C. P. 1969. American Business Abroad. Six Lectures on Direct Investment. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kindleberger, C. P. 1980. A GATT for Foreign Investment; Further Reflections. Carnegie Center for Transnational Studies.Google Scholar
King, A. and Lenox, M. 2000. ‘Industry Self-Regulation without Sanctions: The Chemical Industry's Responsible Care Program’, Academy of Management Journal, 43: 698–716.Google Scholar
King, M. 2009. ‘Speech at the Lord Mayor's Banquet’, 17 June, London.
Kingsbury, B. 1994. ‘The Tuna–Dolphin Controversy, The World Trade Organization, and the Liberal Project to Reconceptualize International Law’, Yearbook of International Environmental Law, 5: 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingsbury, B., Krisch, N. and Stewart, R. B. 2005. ‘The Emergence of Global Administrative Law’, Law and Contemporary Problems, 68: 15–62.Google Scholar
Kingsbury, B. and Schill, S. 2009. ‘Investor–State Arbitration as Governance: Fair and Equitable Treatment, Proportionality and the Emerging Global Administrative Law’. IILJ Working Paper 2009/6 (Global Administrative Law Series), New York University Law School.
Kitch, E. W. 1977. ‘The Nature and Function of the Patent System’, Journal of Law and Economics, 20: 265–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitching, G. 1989. Development and Underdevelopment in Historical Perspective. Populism, Nationalism and Industrialization. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Klein, M. 2000. No Logo. Taking Aim at the Brand Bullies. London: Flamingo.Google Scholar
Kleinman, D. and Kinchy, A. J. 2003. ‘Why Ban Bovine Growth Hormone? Science, Social Welfare, and the Divergent Biotech Policy Landscapes in Europe and the United States’, Science as Culture, 12: 375–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klug, H. 2008. ‘Law, Politics, and Access to Essential Medicines in Developing Countries’, Politics and Society, 36: 207–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knightley, P. 1993. The Rise and Fall of the House of Vestey. London: Warner.Google Scholar
Kobrin, S. J. 1984. ‘Expropriation as an Attempt to Control Foreign Firms in LDCs: Trends from 1960 to 1979’, International Studies Quarterly, 28: 329–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohler-Koch, B. and Eising, R. (eds.) 1999. The Transformation of Governance in the European Union. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolko, G. 1963. The Triumph of Conservatism: A Reinterpretation of American History. New York: Collier Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kongolo, T. 2008. Unsettled International Intellectual Property Issues. Alphen: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Kontorovich, E. 2004. ‘The Piracy Analogy: Modern Universal Jurisdiction's Hollow Foundation’, Harvard International Law Journal, 45: 183–237.Google Scholar
Kooiman, J. (ed.) 1993. Modern Governance. New Government–Society Interactions. London: Sage.
Kornai, J. 1992. The Socialist System. The Political Economy of Communism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, M. 1988. From Apology to Utopia. The Structure of International Legal Argument. Helsinki: Finnish Lawyers' Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M. 1990. ‘The Politics of International Law’, European Journal of International Law, 1: 4–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, M. 2002. The Gentle Civilizer of Nations. The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M. 2007. ‘The Fate of Public International Law: Between Technique and Politics’, Modern Law Review, 70: 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotlikoff, L. J. 2010. Jimmy Stewart is Dead: Ending the World's Ongoing Financial Plague with Limited Purpose Banking. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Kraakman, R. H. (ed.) 2004. The Anatomy of Corporate Law: A Comparative and Functional Approach. Oxford University Press.
Krajewski, M. 2003. National Regulation and Trade Liberalisation in Services: The Legal Impact of the General Agreement on Trade in Services. London: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Kramer, A. E. 2010. ‘Russia slow to pick up the lead in bribery cases’, 29 April, New York Times (Global Edition).
Kramer, C. S. 1989. ‘Food Safety and International Trade. The US–EC Meat and Hormone Controversies’, in Kramer, C. S. (ed.), The Political Economy of US Agriculture. Challenges for the 1990s, 203–33. Washington, DC: National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy. Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
Krasner, S. D. 2001. ‘Sovereignty’, Jan./Feb. Foreign Policy, 122: 20–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochwil, F. V. 1989. Rules, Norms and Decisions. On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kretschmer, M. 2002a. ‘The Failure of Property Rules in Collective Administration: Rethinking Copyright Societies as Regulatory Instruments’, European Intellectual Property Review, 24: 126–37.Google Scholar
Kretschmer, M. 2002b. ‘Copyright Societies Do Not Administer Individual Property Rights: The Incoherence of Institutional Traditions in Germany and the UK’, in Towse, R. (ed.), Copyright in the Cultural Industries, 140–64. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Krippner, G. R. 2005. ‘The Financialization of the American Economy’, Socio-Economic Review, 3: 173–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krisch, N. and Kingsbury, B. 2006. ‘Introduction: Global Governance and Global Administrative Law in the International Legal Order’, European Journal of International Law, 17: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristensen, P. H. and Zeitlin, J. 2005. Local Players in Global Games: The Strategic Constitution of a Multinational Corporation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kronke, H.2005–6. ‘The UN Sales Convention, The UNIDROIT Contract Principles and the Way Beyond’, Journal of Law and Commerce, 25: 451–65.
Kronstein, H. 1973. The Law of International Cartels (trans. from Das Recht der Internationalen Kartellen, 1967). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kronstein, H. and Till, I. 1947. ‘A Reevaluation of the International Patent Convention’, Law and Contemporary Problems, 12: 765–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, A. O. (ed.) 1998. The WTO as an International Organization. University of Chicago Press.
Krugman, P. R. 1994a. ‘Competitiveness: A Dangerous Obsession’, Foreign Affairs, 73: 28–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krugman, P. R. 1994b. Peddling Prosperity: Economic Sense and Nonsense in An Age of Diminished Expectations. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Kuanpoth, J. 2006. ‘TRIPs-Plus Intellectual Property Rules: Impact on Thailand's Public Health’, Journal of World Intellectual Property, 9: 573–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kudo, A. and Hara, T. (eds.) 1992. International Cartels in Business History. University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
Kummer, K. 1995. International Management of Hazardous Wastes: The Basel Convention and Related Legal Rules. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kuprianov, A. 1995. ‘Derivatives Debacles. Case Studies of Large Losses in Derivatives Markets’, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Economic Quarterly, 81: 1–39.Google Scholar
Kuritzkes, A., Schuermann, T. and Weiner, S. M. 2003. ‘Risk Measurement, Risk Management, and Capital Adequacy in Financial Conglomerates’, Brookings–Wharton Papers on Financial Services.
Ladas, S. B. 1930. The International Protection of Industrial Property. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laddie, J. 1996. ‘Copyright: Over-strength, Over-regulated, Over-rated?’, European Intellectual Property Review, 18: 253–60.Google Scholar
Lamoreaux, W. R. 1985. The Great Merger Movement in American Business 1895–1904. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamy, P. 2006. ‘The Place and Role of the WTO and its Law in the International Legal Order’, European Journal of International Law, 17: 969–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landfried, C. 1999. ‘The European Regulation of Biotechnology by Polycratic Governance’, in Joerges, C. and Vos, E. (eds.), EU Committees: Social Regulation, Law and Politics, 173–94. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Lang, A. 2007a. ‘Reflecting on ‘Linkage’: Cognitive and Institutional Change in the International Trading System’, Modern Law Review, 70: 523–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, A. 2007b. ‘The Role of the Human Rights Movement in Trade Policy-Making: Human Rights as a Trigger for Social Learning’, New Zealand Journal of Public and International Law, 5: 77–102.Google Scholar
Lang, A. and Scott, J. 2009. ‘The Hidden World of WTO Governance’, European Journal of International Law, 20: 575–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange, D. 2003. ‘Reimagining the Public Domain’, Law and Contemporary Problems, 66: 463–83.Google Scholar
Lapavitsas, C. 2009. ‘Financialised Capitalism: Crisis and Financial Expropriation’, Historical Materialism, 17: 114–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larosière, J., Balcerowicz, L., Issing, O., Masera, R., Carthy, C. M., Nyberg, L., Pérez, J. and Ruding, O. 2009. Report of the High-Level Group on Financial Supervision in the EU. Brussels.Google Scholar
Lazonick, W. 1991. Business Organization and the Myth of the Market Economy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leary, V. A. 1996. ‘Workers’ Rights and International Trade: The Social Clause (GATT, ILO, NAFTA, US Laws)', in Bhagwati, J. and Hudec, R. E. (eds.), Fair Trade and Harmonization. Prerequisites for Free Trade? Vol. 2 Legal Analysis, 177–230. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lee, R. 1998. What is an exchange?: The Automation, Management, and Regulation of Financial Markets. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
,Leigh Day & Co. 2009. Memorandum to the Joint Committee on Human Rights Inquiry on Business and Human Rights. Leigh, Day & Co. Solicitors.Google Scholar
Leigh, D. and Evans, R. 2007. ‘BAE's secret $12m payout in African deal. Middleman reveals covert cash for “unnecessary” Tanzanian radar sale’, 15 January, Guardian.
Leiner, B. M., Cerf, V. G., Clark, D. D., Kahn, R. E., Kleinrock, L., Lynch, D. C., Postel, J., Roberts, L. G. and Wolff, S. 2003. ‘A Brief History of the Internet’ (www.isoc.org/internet/history/brief.shtml: Internet Society).
Lennard, M. 2002. ‘Navigating by the Stars: Interpreting the WTO Agreements’, Journal of International Economic Law, 5: 17–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lessig, L. 2001. The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Lessig, L. 2006. ‘.commons’, in Drobak, J. N. (ed.), Norms and the Law, 88–104. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leubuscher, C. 1956. Bulk Buying from the Colonies: A Study of the Bulk Purchase of Colonial Commodities by the United Kingdom Government. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levi-Faur, D. and Jordana, J. (eds.) 2005. The Rise of Regulatory Capitalism: The Global Diffusion of a New Order. London: Sage.
Levy, N. 2003. ‘EU Merger Control: From Birth to Adolescence’, World Competition, 26: 195–218.Google Scholar
,LEWRG(London/Edinburgh Weekend Return Group) 1980. In and Against the State. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
Leyshon, A. and Thrift, N. 1995. ‘Geographies of Financial Exclusion: Financial Abandonment in Britain and the United States’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 20: 312–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichtenstein, C. C. 1997. ‘The New Financial World of Cross-Border Capital Movements: The International Monetary Fund Agreement in the Light of the 1994 Mexico Peso Crisis’, in Weber, A. (ed.), Währung und Wirtschaft. Das Geld im Recht. Festschrift für Prof. Dr. Hugo J. Hahn zum 70. Geburtstag. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Lillich, R. B. and Weston, B. H. 1975. International Claims: Their Settlement by Lump-Sum Agreements. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
Lillich, R. B. and Weston, B. H. 1988. ‘Lump-Sum Agreements: Their Continuing Contribution to the Law of International Claims’, American Journal of International Law, 82: 69–80.Google Scholar
Lim, H. 2001. ‘Trade and Human Rights What's at Issue?’, Journal of World Trade, 35: 275–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindgren, C.-J., Garcia, G. and Saal, M. I. 1996. Bank Soundness and Macro-Economic Policy. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
Lindner, L. F. 2008. ‘Regulating Food Safety: The Power of Alignment and Drive towards Convergence’, Innovation: The European Journal of Social Sciences, 21: 133–43.Google Scholar
Lipson, C. 1985. Standing Guard: Protecting Foreign Capital in the 19th and 20th Centuries. Berkeley: California University Press.Google Scholar
Loughlin, M. and Scott, C. 1997. ‘The Regulatory State’, in Dunleavy, P., Gamble, A., Holliday, I. and Peele, G. (eds.), Developments in British Politics 5, 205–19. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, A. V. 1983. Extraterritorial Jurisdiction. An Annotated Collection of Legal Materials. Cambridge: Grotius.Google Scholar
Lowenfeld, A. F. 1979. ‘Public Law in the International Arena; Conflict of Laws, International Law and Some Suggestions for their Interaction’, Academy of International Law, The Hague, Recueil des Cours, 163: 315–445.Google Scholar
Lowenfeld, A. F. 1990. ‘United States Law Enforcement Abroad: The Constitution and International Law, Continued’, American Journal of International Law, 84: 444–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowenfeld, A. F. 1996. International Litigation and the Quest for Reasonableness. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Lowenfeld, A. F. 2002. International Economic Law. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lubkin, G. 2002. ‘The End of Extraterritorial Income Exclusion? The WTO Appellate Decision and Its Consequences’, Tax Management International Journal, 31: 254–69.Google Scholar
Lugard, F. J. D. 1919/1970. Political Memoranda: Revision of Instructions to Political Officers on Subjects Chiefly Political and Administrative, 1913–1918. London: Cass.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N. 1987. ‘The Unity of the Legal System’, in Teubner, G. (ed.), Autopoietic Law: A New Approach to Law and Society, 12–35. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lutter, M. 1990. ‘Enterprise Law Corp. vs Entity Law Inc. – Philip Blumberg's Book from the Point of View of an European Lawyer’, American Journal of Comparative Law 38: 949–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyons, F. S. L. 1963. Internationalism in Europe 1815–1914. Leyden: Sythoff.Google Scholar
MacCormick, N. 1995. ‘The Maastricht-Urteil: Sovereignty Now’, European Law Journal 1: 259–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macdonald, S. 2002. ‘Exploring the Hidden Costs of Patents’, in Drahos, P. and Mayne, R. (eds.), Global Intellectual Property Rights. Knowledge, Access, Development, 13–39. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan, Oxfam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macintosh, J. 2008. ‘Board comes under fire’, 17 September, Financial Times.
MacKenzie, D. 2003. ‘An Equation and Its Worlds: Bricolage, Exemplars, Disunity and Performativity in Financial Economics’, Social Studies of Science, 33: 831–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKenzie, D. 2006. An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial Models Shape Markets. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKenzie, D. 2009. ‘All Those Arrows’, London Review of Books, 31: 20–2.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, D. A., Muniesa, F.and Siu, L. (eds.) 2007. Do Economists Make Markets?Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Macneil, I. R., Campbell, D., Feinman, J. M. and Vincent-Jones, P. 2001. The Relational Theory of Contract: Selected Works of Ian Macneil. London: Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar
Macpherson, C. B. 1962. The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Madsen, M. R. and Vauchez, A. 2004. ‘European Constitutionalism at the Cradle. Law and Lawyers in the Construction of a European Political Order (1920–1960)’, in Jettinghoff, A. and Schepel, H. (eds.), Recht der Werkelijkheid, 15–34 (special issue on lawyers' circles, lawyers and European legal integration).
Maher, I. 2002. ‘Competition Law in the International Domain: Networks as a New Form of Governance’, Journal of Law and Society, 29: 111–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maher, I. 2008. ‘Regulation and Modes of Governance in EC Competition Law: What's New in Enforcement?’, Fordham International Law Journal, 31: 1713–40.Google Scholar
Majone, G. (ed.) 1990. Deregulation or Re-Regulation. Regulatory Reform in Europe and the United States. London: Pinter.
Majone, G. 1993. ‘The Rise of the Regulatory State in Europe’, West European Politics, 17: 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malkin, J. and Wildavsky, A. 1991. ‘Why the Traditional Distinction between Public and Private Goods Should Be Abandoned’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 3: 355–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallaby, S. 2010. `Wall Street owes its survival to the Fed', 2 December, Financial Times.
Manby, B. 1999. ‘The Role and Responsibility of Oil Multinationals in Nigeria’, Journal of International Affairs, 53: 281–301.Google Scholar
Manin, B. 1994. ‘The Metamorphoses of Representative Government’, Economy and Society, 23: 133–71.Google Scholar
Manin, B. 1997. The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, F. A. 1964. ‘The Doctrine of Jurisdiction in International Law’, Academy of International Law, The Hague, Recueil des Cours, 111: 1–162.Google Scholar
Mann, F. A. 1984. ‘The Doctrine of International Jurisdiction Revisited after 20 Years’, Recueil des Cours de l'Académie de Droit International, 186: 9–116.Google Scholar
Marceau, G. 2002. ‘WTO Dispute Settlement and Human Rights’, European Journal of International Law, 13: 753–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marceau, G. and Trachtman, J. P. 2002. ‘The Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement, the Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures Agreement, and the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade: A Map of the World Trade Organization Law of Domestic Regulation of Goods’, Journal of World Trade, 36: 811–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcial, G. G. 1995. Secrets of the Street. The Dark Side of Making Money. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Marcus, A. 1989. The Middle East on the Eve of Modernity. Aleppo in the Eighteenth Century. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Marsh, D. 1992. The Bundesbank: The Bank that Rules Europe. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Marx, K. 1867/1976. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Mashayekhi, M., Julsaint, M. and Tuerk, E. 2006. ‘Strategic Considerations for Developing Countries: The Case of GATS and Health Services’, in Blouin, C., Drager, N. and Smith, R. (eds.), International Trade in Health Services and The GATS: Current Issues and Debates, 17–81. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Mason, J. R. and Rosner, J. 2007. ‘Where Did the Risk Go? How Misapplied Bond Ratings Cause Mortgage Backed Securities and Collateralized Debt Obligation Market Disruptions’: SSRN.
Mathews, D. 2002. Globalizing Intellectual Property Rights: The TRIPs Agreement. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsushita, M. 1993. International Trade and Competition Law in Japan. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mattli, W. and Büthe, T. 2005. ‘Accountability in Accounting? The Politics of Private Rule-Making in the Public Interest’, Governance, 18: 399–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattoo, A. 1997. ‘National Treatment in the GATS: Corner-Stone or Pandora's Box’, Journal of World Trade, 31: 107–35.Google Scholar
Mattoo, A. 1998. ‘Financial Services and the WTO: Liberalization in the Developing and Transition Economies’, WTO Staff Working Paper TISD–98–03.
May, C. and Sell, S. K. 2006. Intellectual Property Rights: A Critical History. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Maycock, J. 1986. Financial Conglomerates: The New Phenomenon. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
McBarnet, D. 2007. ‘Corporate Social Responsibility beyond Law, through Law, for Law: The New Corporate Accountability’, in McBarnet, D., Voiculescu, A. and Campbell, T. (eds.), The New Corporate Accountability. Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law, 9–56. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McBarnet, D. and Kurkchiyan, M. 2007. ‘Corporate Social Responsibility through Contractual Control? Global Supply Chains and “Other Regulation”’, in McBarnet, D., Voiculescu, A. and Campbell, T. (eds.), The New Corporate Accountability. Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law, 59–92. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McBarnet, D. and Schmidt, P. 2007. ‘Corporate Accountability through Creative Enforcement: Human Rights, the Alien Torts Claims Act and the Limits of Legal Impunity’, in McBarnet, D., Voiculescu, A. and Campbell, T. (eds.), The New Corporate Accountability. Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law, 148–76. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McBarnet, D., Voiculescu, A. and Campbell, T. (eds.) 2007. The New Corporate Accountability: Corporate Social Responsibility and the Law. Cambridge University Press.
McBarnet, D. and Whelan, C. 1999. Creative Accounting and the Cross-Eyed Javelin-Thrower. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
McCahery, J. and Picciotto, S. 1995. ‘Creative Lawyering and the Dynamics of Business Regulation’, in Dezalay, Y. and Sugarman, D. (eds.), Professional Competition and Professional Power. Lawyers, Accountants and the Social Construction of Markets, 238–74. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McCahery, J., Picciotto, S. and Scott, C. (eds.) 1993. Corporate Control and Accountability. Changing Structures and the Dynamics of Regulation. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
McClean, J. D. 2002. International Co-operation in Civil and Criminal Matters. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McCrudden, C. 1999. ‘International Economic Law and the Pursuit of Human Rights: A Framework for Discussion of the Legality of “Selective Purchasing” Laws Under the WTO Government Procurement Agreement’, Journal of International Economic Law, 2: 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGinnis, J. O. and Movesian, M. L. 2000. ‘The World Trade Constitution’, Harvard Law Review, 114: 512–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrath, J. 1994. ‘The lawyers who rebuilt EuroDisney’, International Financial Law Review, May, 10–12.
McKelvey, M. D. 1996. Evolutionary Innovation. The Business of Biotechnology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McKinley, T. and Kyrili, K. 2009. ‘Is Stagnation of Domestic Revenue in Low-Income Countries Inevitable?’, CDPR Research Paper 27/09. London: School of Oriental and African Studies.
McMichael, P. 1996. ‘Globalization: Myths and Realities’, Rural Sociology, 61: 25–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNair, L. 1961 The Law of Treaties. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McRae, D. M. 2000. ‘The WTO in International Law: Tradition Continued or New Frontier?’, Journal of International Economic Law, 3: 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meeran, R. 1999. ‘The Unveiling of Transnational Corporations: A Direct Approach’, in Addo, M. K. (ed.), Human Rights Standards and the Responsibility of Transnational Corporations. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 161–70.Google Scholar
Meeran, R. 2009. Open Letter to UN Secretary-General's Special Representative on Business and Human Rights: The Genesis and Development of MNC Litigation in South Africa and a Possible Model for the Future.
Mehrotra, A. K. 2005. ‘Envisioning the Modern American Fiscal State: Progressive-Era Economists and the Intellectual Foundations of the US Income Tax’, UCLA Law Review, 52: 1793–866.Google Scholar
Meidinger, E. 2006. ‘The Administrative Law of Global Private–Public Regulation: The Case of Forestry’, European Journal of International Law, 17: 47–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mekouar, M. A. 2000. ‘Pesticides and Chemicals. The Requirement of Prior Informed Consent’, in Shelton, D. (ed.), Commitment and Compliance. The Role of Non-Binding Norms in the International Legal System, 146–63. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mekouar, M. A. 2002. ‘A Global Instrument on Agrodiversity: The International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture’, FAO Legal Papers Online 24: Food and Agriculture Organization.
Meléndez-Ortiz, R. and Sánchez, V. (eds.) 2005. Trading in Genes – Development Perspectives on Biotechnology, Trade and Sustainability. London: Earthscan.
Melissaris, E. 2004. ‘The More the Merrier? A New Take on Legal Pluralism’, Social and Legal Studies, 13: 57–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mena, L. N. A. O. and Rodriguez, R. 2005. ‘Mexico's International Telecommunications Policy: Origins, the WTO Dispute, and Future Challenges’, Telecommunications Policy, 29: 429–48.Google Scholar
Merges, R. P. 1996. ‘Contracting into Liability Rules: Intellectual Property Rights and Collective Rights Organizations’, California Law Review, 84: 1293–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merges, R. P. 1999. ‘As Many as Six Impossible Patents Before Breakfast: Property Rights for Business Concepts and Patent System Reform’, Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 14: 577–615.Google Scholar
Merges, R. P. 2008. ‘The continuing vitality of music performance rights organizations’. Law and Technology Scholarship 49: Berkeley Center for Law and Technology, Paper 37.
Merges, R. P. and Nelson, R. R. 1990. ‘On the Complex Economics of Patent Scope’, Columbia Law Review, 90: 839–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merk, J. 2004. ‘Regulating the Global Athletic Footwear Industry: The Collective Worker in the Product Chain’, in Assassi, L., Wigan, D. and Pijl, K. v. d. (eds.), Global Regulation. Managing Crises After the Imperial Turn, 128–43. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Merrill, S. A. and Mazza, A.-M. (eds.) 2006. Reaping the Benefits of Genomic and Proteomic Research. Intellectual Property Rights, Innovation, and Public Health. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; for Committee on Intellectual Property Rights in Genomic and Protein Research of the National Research Council of the National Academies.
Merry, S. E. 1988. ‘Legal Pluralism’, Law and Society Review, 22: 869–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mertes, T. and Bello, W. F. 2004. A Movement of Movements: Is Another World Really Possible?London: Verso.Google Scholar
Mestral, A. L. C. and Gruchalla-Wesierski, T. 1990. Extraterritorial Application of Export Control Legislation: Canada and the USA. Dordrecht: Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Miéville, C. 2005. Between Equal Rights: A Marxist Theory of International Law. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Mikulecky, D. 2001. ‘The Emergence of Complexity: Science Coming of Age or Science Growing Old?’, Computers and Chemistry, 25: 341–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milward, A. S. 1992. The European Rescue of the Nation-State. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Minsky, H. P. 1992. ‘The Financial Instability Hypothesis’, Jerome Levy Economics Institute Working Papers 74: Bard College, Levy Economics Institute.
Mitrany, D. 1943/1966. A Working Peace System. Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Mommsen, W. J. and Moor, J. A. (eds.) 1992. European Expansion and Law. The Encounter of European and Indigenous Law in 19th and 20th Century Africa and Asia. Oxford: Berg.
Monbiot, G. 2003. ‘I was wrong about trade. Our aim should not be to abolish the World Trade Organisation, but to transform it’, 24 June, Guardian.
Montagna, P. 1990. ‘Accounting Rationality and Financial Legitimation’, in Zukin, S. and DiMaggio, P. (eds.), Structures of Capital. The Social Organization of the Economy, 227–60. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Montgomerie, J. 2008. ‘Bridging the Critical Divide: Global Finance, Financialisation and Contemporary Capitalism’, Contemporary Politics, 14: 233–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montt, S. 2009. State Liability in Investment Arbitration Global Constitutional and Administrative Law in the BIT Generation. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Moore, M. 2000. ‘The backlash against globalization?’, Speech to the Liberal International, Ottawa: WTO.
Moore, M. 2004. ‘Taxation and the Political Agenda, North and South’, Norwegian Institute for International Affairs.
Moore, M. 2007. ‘How does taxation affect the quality of governance? Can dependency on taxation make governments accountable, capable and responsive?’, Working Paper 280 Brighton, Institute for Development Studies.
Moran, M. 1984. The Politics of Banking. The Strange Case of Competition and Credit Control. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Moran, M. 1991. The Politics of the Financial Services Revolution. The USA, the UK, Japan. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Moran, M. 2003. The British Regulatory State: High Modernism and Hyper-Innovation. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, B. 2003. ‘The Economization of Politics: Meta-Regulation as a Form of Nonjudicial Legality’, Social and Legal Studies, 12: 489–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, G. 2006. ‘Transnational Actors, Transnational Institutions, Transnational Spaces: The Role of Law Firms in the Internationalization of Competition Regulation’, in Djelic, M.-L. and Sahlin-Anderson, K. (eds.), Transnational Governance: Institutional Dynamics of Regulation, 139–60. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, G., Kristensen, P. H. and Whitley, R. 2001. The Multinational Firm: Organizing Across Institutional and National Divides. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Morris-Suzuki, T. 2000. ‘For and Against NGOs. The Politics of the Lived World’, New Left Review (second series), 2: 63–84.Google Scholar
Mosher, J. S. and Trubek, D. M. 2003. ‘Alternative Approaches to Governance in the EU: EU Social Policy and the European Employment Strategy’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 41: 63–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mowery, D. C. and Rosenberg, N. 1998. Paths of Innovation. Technological Change in 20th Century America. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyer-Henry, K. 2008. ‘Patenting Neem and Hoodia: Conflicting Decisions Issued by the Opposition Board of the European Patent Office’, Biotechnology Law Report, 27: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muchlinski, P. 1999. ‘A Brief History of Regulation’, in Picciotto, S. and Mayne, R. (eds.), Regulating International Business. Beyond Liberalization. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Muchlinski, P. 2001. ‘Corporations in International Litigation: Problems of Jurisdiction and the UK Asbestos Cases’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 50: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muchlinski, P. 2007. Multinational Enterprises and the Law. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munck, R. 1988. The New International Labour Studies. An Introduction. London: Zed Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, C. N. 1994. International Organization and Industrial Change. Global Governance since 1850. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, D. D. 2004. The Structure of Regulatory Competition. Corporations and Public Policies in a Global Economy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, D. D. 2005. ‘Interjurisdictional competition and regulatory advantage’, Journal of International Economic Law, 8: 891–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, D., Raynolds, L. T. and Taylor, P. L. 2003. One Cup at a Time. Poverty Alleviation and Fair Trade Coffee in Latin America. Boulder, CO: Fair Trade Research Group, Colorado University.Google Scholar
Murray, R. 1971. ‘The Internationalization of Capital and the Nation State’, New Left Review (first series), 67: 84–109.Google Scholar
Musgrave, R. A. 1992. ‘Schumpeter's Crisis of the Tax State: An Essay in Fiscal Sociology’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 2: 89–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadal, L. M. 2008. ‘Why Is the Subpart F AFI Exception Temporary?’, Tax Notes International, 50: 11–13.Google Scholar
Nadelmann, E. A. 1990. ‘Global Prohibition Regimes: The Evolution of Norms in International Society’, International Organization, 44: 479–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadelmann, E. A. 1993. Cops Across Borders: The Internationalization of US Criminal Law Enforcement. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Naess, E. D. 1972. The Great Panlibhon Controversy. The Fight over the Flags of Shipping. London: Gower Press.Google Scholar
Naylor, R. T. 1994. Hot Money and the Politics of Debt. Montreal: Black Rose Books.Google Scholar
Neale, A. D. and Stephens, M. L. 1988. International Business and National Jurisdiction. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Nesvetailova, A. 2007. Fragile Finance: Debt, Speculation and Crisis in the Age of Global Credit. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, F. 1942. Behemoth (Left Book Club edition). London: Gollancz.Google Scholar
Neumayer, E. and Spess, L. 2005. ‘Do Bilateral Investment Treaties Increase Foreign Direct Investment to Developing Countries?’, World Development, 33: 1567–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholls, A. and Opal, C. 2005. Fair Trade. Market-Driven Ethical Consumption. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Nicolaïdis, K. 2007. ‘Trusting the Poles? Constructing Europe through Mutual Recognition’, Journal of European Public Policy, 14: 682–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolaïdis, P. 1991. ‘Investment Policies in an Integrated World Economy’, World Economy, 14: 121–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolaïdis, P. 1992. ‘Competition Among Rules’, World Competition, 16: 113–21.Google Scholar
Nimmer, D. 2000. ‘A Riff on Fair Use in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act’, University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 148: 673–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noble, D. F. 1977 America By Design. Science, Technology, and the Rise of Capitalism. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Noll, R. G. (ed.) 1985. Regulatory Policy and the Social Sciences. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Nonet, P. and Selznick, P. 2001 (orig.1978). Law and Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Noonan, J. T. 1976. Persons and Masks of the Law. New York: Farrar, Strauss & Giroux.Google Scholar
Norr, M. 1962. ‘Jurisdiction to Tax and National Income’, Tax Law Review, 17 431–63.Google Scholar
North, D. C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Northrup, H. R. and Rowan, R. 1979. Multinational Collective Bargaining Attempts: The Record, the Cases and the Prospects. Philadelphia: Industrial Relations Unit, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Nov, A. 2006. ‘The “Bidding War” to Attract Foreign Direct Investment: The Need for a Global Solution’, Virginia Tax Review, 25: 835–75.Google Scholar
Novy, A. and Leubolt, B. 2005. ‘Participatory Budgeting in Porto Alegre: Social Innovation and the Dialectical Relationship of State and Civil Society’, Urban Studies, 42: 2023–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, H. 1986. ‘International Cartels and Multinational Enterprises’, in Teichova, A., Levy-Leboyer, M. and Nussbaum, H. (eds.), Multinational Enterprise in Historical Perspective, 131–44. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O'Connell, D. 2006. ‘BAE cashes in on £40bn Arab jet deal’, 20 August, The Sunday Times.
O'Rourke, D. 2002. ‘Monitoring the Monitors: A Critique of Corporate, Third-Party Labor Monitoring’, in Jenkins, R., Pearson, R. and Seyfang, G. (eds.), Corporate Responsibility and Labour Rights. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Odell, J. and Eichengreen, B. 1998. ‘The United States, the ITO and the WTO: Exit Options, Agent Slack and Presidential Leadership’, in Krueger, A. O. (ed.), The WTO as an International Organization, 181–212. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
,Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 1977. Restrictive Business Practices of Multinational Enterprises. Paris:OECD, Committee of Experts on Restrictive Business Practices.Google Scholar
,Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 1979. International Investment and Multinational Enterprises. Review of the 1976 Declaration and Decisions. Paris: OECD–CIIME.Google Scholar
,Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 1987a. Minimizing Conflicting Requirements. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
,Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 1987b. Competition Policy and International Trade. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
,Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 1987c. Introduction to the OECD Codes of Liberalisation. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
,Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 1987d. International Tax Avoidance and Evasion. Four Related Studies. Paris: OECD, Committee on Fiscal Affairs.Google Scholar
,Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 1994a. Merger Cases in the Real World – A Study of Merger Control Procedures. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
,Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 1994b. Regulatory Reform for an Interdependent World. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
,Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 1995. Security Markets in OECD Countries. Organisation and Regulation. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
,Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 1996. Controlled Foreign Company Legislation. Paris: OECD, Committee on Fiscal Affairs.Google Scholar
,Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 1998. Harmful Tax Competition. An Emerging Global Issue. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
,Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 2000a. No Longer Business as Usual: Fighting Bribery and Corruption. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
,Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 2000b. Codes of Corporate Conduct: An Expanded Review of their Contents. TD/TC/WP(99)56/FINAL. Paris: OECD, Working Party of the Trade Committee.Google Scholar
,Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 2000c. Tax Burdens. Alternative Measures. Paris: OECD, Fiscal Affairs Secretariat.Google Scholar
,Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 2001a. The OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. Text, Commentary and Clarifications. DAFFE/IME/WPG(2000)15/FINAL. Paris: OECD, Directorate for Financial, Fiscal and Enterprise Affairs.Google Scholar
,Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 2001b. Tax and the Economy. A Comparative Assessment of OECD Countries. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
,Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 2002a. Genetic Inventions, Intellectual Property Rights and Licensing Practices. Evidences and Policies. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
,Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 2002b. OECD Economic Surveys. United Kingdom. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
,Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 2002c. Forty Years' Experience with the OECD Code of Liberalisation of Capital MovementsParis: OECD.Google Scholar
,Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 2005a. Revenue Statistics 1965–2004. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
,Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 2005b. Measuring Globalisation: OECD Economic Globalisation Indicators. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
,Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 2006. Tax Co-operation: Towards a Level Playing Field. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
,Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 2007a. Measuring Globalisation: Activities of Multinationals – Volume I: Manufacturing, 2000–2004. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
,Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 2007b. Tax Co-operation 2007: Towards a Level Playing Field: Assessment by the Global Forum on Taxation. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
,Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 2008. Tax Co-operation 2008: Towards a Level Playing Field: Assessment by the Global Forum on Taxation. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
,Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 2009. The Role of Stock Exchanges in Corporate Governance. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
,Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 2010a. Promoting Transparency and Exchange of Information for Tax Purposes. Paris: OECD–CFA.Google Scholar
,Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 2010b. Addressing Tax Risks Involving Bank Losses. Paris: OECD, Joint Report of the Forum on Tax Administration and Working Party No. 8 on Tax Avoidance and Evasion.Google Scholar
,OECD–CFA 2002. Reference Guide on Sources of Information from Abroad. Paris: OECD, Committee on Fiscal Affairs.Google Scholar
,OECD–CFA 2006. Manual on Information Exchange. Paris: OECD Committee on Fiscal Affairs.Google Scholar
,OECD Watch 2005. Five Years On. A Review of the OECD Guidelines and National Contact Points. Amsterdam: SOMO.Google Scholar
Offe, C. and Keane, J. 1984. Contradictions of the Welfare State. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Olson, M. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ormrod, W. M., Bonney, M. and Bonney, R. 1999. Crises, Revolutions and Self-Sustained Growth: Essays in European Fiscal History, 1130–1830. Stamford: Shaun Tyas.Google Scholar
Osborne, D. and Gaebler, T. 1992. Reinventing Government. How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owens, J. 2007. Written Testimony of Jeffrey Owens, Director, OECD Center for Tax Policy and Administration, Hearings on Offshore Tax Evasion, 3 May, Washington, DC: Senate Finance Committee.Google Scholar
Owens, J. 2009. ‘Tax and Development’, Tax Justice Focus, 4: 1–3.Google Scholar
Padoa-Schioppa, T. and Saccomanni, F. 1994. ‘Managing a Market-Led Global Financial System’, in Kenen, P. B. (ed.), Managing the World Economy. Fifty Years after Bretton Woods, 235–68. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
Palan, R. 1999. ‘Offshore and the Structural Enablement of Sovereignty’, in Hampton, M. P. and Abbott, J. P. (eds.), Offshore Finance Centres and Tax Havens. The Rise of Global Capital. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Palan, R. 2002. ‘Tax Havens and the Commercialization of State Sovereignty’, International Organization, 56: 151–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palan, R. 2003. The Offshore World: Sovereign Markets, Virtual Places, and Nomad Millionaires. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Palmeter, D. and Mavroidis, P. C. 1998. ‘The WTO Legal System: Sources of Law’, American Journal of International Law, 92: 398–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, C. 2002. The Open Corporation. Effective Self-regulation and Democracy. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parry, B. 2004a. ‘Bodily Transactions: Regulating a New Space of Flows in “Bio-Information” ’, in Verderey, K. and Humphrey, C. (eds.), Property in Question. Value Transformation in the Global Economy, 29–48. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Parry, B. 2004b. Trading the Genome: Investigating the Commodification of Bio-Information. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Partnoy, F. 2002. ‘ISDA, NASD, CFMA, and SDNY: The four horsemen of derivatives regulation?’, Brookings–Wharton Papers on Financial Services.
Partnoy, F. 2006. ‘How and why credit rating agencies are not like other gatekeepers’, San Diego Legal Studies Papers 07–46: University of San Diego School of Law.
Partnoy, F. 2008. ‘Hubris – is thy name Richard Fuld?’, 12 September, Financial Times.
Patel, S. J., Roffe, P. and Yusuf, A. (eds.) 2001. International Technology Transfer. The Origins and Aftermath of the United Nations Negotiations on a Draft Code of Conduct. The Hague: Kluwer Law.
Paul, J. R. 1991. ‘Comity in International Law’, Harvard International Law Journal, 32: 1–79.
Pauly, L. W. 1997. Who Elected the Bankers? Surveillance and Control in the World Economy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Pauwelyn, J. 2001. ‘The Role of Public International Law in the WTO: How Far Can We Go?’, American Journal of International Law, 95: 535–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwelyn, J. 2005. ‘Rien ne va plus? Distinguishing Domestic Regulation From Market Access in GATT and GATS’, World Trade Review, 4: 131–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payer, C. 1982. The World Bank: A Critical Analysis. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Payne, P. L. 1988. British Entrepreneurship in the Nineteenth Century. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, J. H. N. 2007. ‘The Rise and Development of the Concept of “Total Income” in United Kingdom Income Tax Law: 1842–1952’, in Tiley, J. (ed.), Studies in the History of Tax Law. Vol. 2, 87–118. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Peckron, H. S. 2002. ‘Watchdogs that Failed to Bark: Standards of Tax Review after Enron’, Florida Tax Review, 5: 853–916.Google Scholar
Pekkanen, S. M. 2001. ‘Aggressive Legalism: The Rules of the WTO and Japan's Emerging Trade Strategy’, World Economy, 24: 707–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pekkanen, S. M. 2003. ‘International Law, Industry and the State: Explaining Japan's Complainant Activities at the WTO’, Pacific Review, 16: 285–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penaherrera, G. S. 1980. ‘Viable Integration and the Economic Co-Operation Problems of the Developing World’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 19: 65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penrose, E. T. 1951. The Economics of the International Patent System. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Penrose, E. T., Joffe, G. and Stevens, P. 1992. ‘Nationalisation of Foreign-Owned Property for a Public Purpose: An Economic Perspective on Appropriate Compensation’, Modern Law Review, 55: 351–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peredo, E., Lora, M. and Buxton, N. 2007. ‘ICSID: Justice According to Transnationals’, Tunupa, (34) (available from: www.funsolon.org/publicaciones/TUNUPA34CIADI.pdf; accessed 24/03/2010).Google Scholar
Perez, O. 2002. ‘Using Private–Public Linkages to Regulate Environmental Conflicts: The Case of International Construction Contracts’, Journal of Law and Society, 29: 77–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perez, O. 2004. Ecological Sensitivity and Global Legal Pluralism: Rethinking the Trade and Environment Conflict. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Perry, J. and Nölke, A. 2006. ‘The Political Economy of International Accounting Standards’, Review of International Political Economy, 13: 559–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersmann, E.-U. 1993a. ‘International Competition Rules for the GATT–MTO World Trade and Legal System’, Journal of World Trade, 27: 35–86.Google Scholar
Petersmann, E.-U. 1993b. ‘National Constitutions and International Economic Law’, in Hilf, M. and Petersmann, E.-U. (eds.), National Constitutions and International Economic Law, 3–53. Deventer: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Petersmann, E.-U. 1998. ‘How to Constitutionalize International Law and Foreign Policy for the Benefit of Civil Society’, Michigan Journal of International Law, 20: 1–30.Google Scholar
Petersmann, E.-U. 2000. ‘The WTO Constitution and Human Rights’, Journal of International Economic Law 3: 19–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersmann, E.-U. 2002a. ‘Constitutionalism and WTO Law: From a State-Centered Approach Towards a Human Rights Approach in International Economic Law’, in Kennedy, D. L. M. and Southwick, J. D. (eds.), The Political Economy of International Trade Law. Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec, 32–67. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersmann, E.-U. 2002b. ‘Time for a United Nations “Global Compact” for Integrating Human Rights into the Law of Worldwide Organizations: Lessons from European Integration’, European Journal of International Law, 13: 621–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersmann, E.-U. 2003. ‘Human Rights and the Law of the World Trade Organization’, Journal of World Trade, 37: 241–81.Google Scholar
Petersmann, E.-U. 2004. ‘The “Human Rights Approach” Advocated by the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and by the International Labour Organization: Is It Relevant for WTO Law and Policy?’, Journal of International Economic Law, 7: 605–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersmann, E.-U. 2005. ‘Human Rights and International Trade Law: Defining and Connecting the Two Fields’, in Cottier, T., Paulwelyn, J. and Bonanomi, E. Bürgi (eds.), Human Rights and International Trade, 29–94. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, L. E. 2006. ‘More Spanish portfolio investors line up to sue Russia over Yukos’, 13 October, Investment Treaty News.Google Scholar
Peterson, L. E. 2009. ‘Argentine Crisis Arbitration Awards Pile Up, But Investors Still Wait for a Payout’, Focus Europe: law.com.
Picciotto, S. 1983. ‘Jurisdictional Conflicts, International Law and the International State System’, International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 11: 11–40.Google Scholar
Picciotto, S. 1991. ‘The Internationalization of the State’, Capital and Class, 43: 43–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Picciotto, S. 1992. International Business Taxation. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Picciotto, S. 1995. ‘The Construction of International Taxation’, in Dezalay, Y. and Sugarman, D. (eds.), Professional Competition and Professional Power, 25–50. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Picciotto, S. 1997a. ‘Fragmented States and International Rules of Law’, Social and Legal Studies, 6: 259–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Picciotto, S. 1997b. ‘Networks in International Economic Integration: Fragmented States and the Dilemmas of Neo-Liberalism’, Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business, 17: 1014–56.Google Scholar
Picciotto, S. 1998. ‘Linkages in International Investment Regulation: The Antinomies of the Draft Multilateral Agreement on Investment’, University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law, 19: 731–68.Google Scholar
Picciotto, S. 1999. ‘Offshore: The State as Legal Fiction’, in Hampton, M. P. and Abbott, J. P. (eds.), Offshore Finance Centres and Tax Havens. The Rise of Global Capital, 43–79. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Picciotto, S. 2000. ‘Lessons of the MAI: Towards a New Regulatory Framework for International Investment’, Law, Social Justice and Global Development (www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/elj/lgd/2000_1/picciotto).
Picciotto, S. 2001. ‘Democratizing Globalism’, in Drache, D. (ed.), The Market or the Public Domain? Global Governance and the Asymmetry of Power, 335–59. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Picciotto, S. 2002. ‘Copyright Licensing: The Case of Higher Education Photocopying in the UK’, European Intellectual Property Review, 24: 438–47.Google Scholar
Picciotto, S. 2003a. ‘Private Rights vs Public Standards in the WTO’, Review of International Political Economy, 10: 377–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Picciotto, S. 2003b. ‘Rights, Responsibilities and Regulation of International Business’, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 42: 131–52.Google Scholar
Picciotto, S. 2005. ‘The WTO's Appellate Body: Formalism as a Legitimation of Global Governance’, Governance, 18: 477–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Picciotto, S. 2007a. ‘Constructing Compliance: Game Playing, Tax Law, and the Regulatory State’, Law and Policy, 29: 11–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Picciotto, S. 2007b. ‘The WTO as a Node of Global Governance: Economic Regulation and Human Rights Discourses’, Law, Social Justice and Global Development, paper 1.
Picciotto, S. and Campbell, D. I. 2003. ‘Whose Molecule Is It Anyway? Private and Social Perspectives on Intellectual Property’, in A. Hudson (ed.), New Perspectives on Property Law, Obligations and Restitution, 279–303. London: Cavendish.Google Scholar
Picciotto, S. and Haines, J. 1999. ‘Regulating Global Financial Markets’, Journal of Law and Society, 26: 351–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Picciotto, S. and Mayne, R. (eds.) 1999. Regulating International Business. Beyond Liberalization. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRef
Pierre, J. (ed.) 2000. Debating Governance. Oxford University Press.
Pinder, J. 1968. ‘Positive and Negative Integration: Some Problems of Economic Union in the EEC’, World Today, 24: 88–110.Google Scholar
Pitkethly, R. 1999. ‘The European Patent System: Implementing Patent Law Harmonisation’, Oxford: OIPRC.
Plant, A. 1934. ‘The Economic Theory Concerning Patents for Inventions’, Economica (new series), 1: 45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plasseraud, Y. and Savignon, F. 1983. Paris 1883. Genèse du Droit Unioniste des Brevets. Paris: Librairies techniques.Google Scholar
Porter, M. E. 1998. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, T. 1993. States, Markets, and Regimes in Global Finance. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Power, M. 1997. The Audit Society. Rituals of Verification. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Prager, F. D. 1944. ‘A History of Intellectual Property from 1545 to 1787’, Journal of the Patent Office Society, 26: 711–59.Google Scholar
Prebble, J. 1998. ‘Should Tax Legislation Be Written From a Principles and Purpose Point of View or a Precise and Detailed Point of View’, British Tax Review, 112–23.Google Scholar
Preeg, E. H. 1970. Traders and Diplomats. An Analysis of the Kennedy Round of Negotiations under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Prieto-Acosta, M. G. 2006. ‘Biodiversity versus Biotechnology: An economic and environmental struggle for life’, in Williams, L. (ed.), International Poverty Law. An Emerging Discourse, 48–86. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Princen, S. 2002. EU Regulation and Transatlantic Trade. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Prosser, T. 2000. ‘Public Service Law: Privatization's Unexpected Offspring’, Law and Contemporary Problems, 63: 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prows, P. S. 2006. ‘Tough Love: The Dramatic Birth and Looming Demise of UNCLOS Property Law’, New York University Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers 30.CrossRef
,PWC and WB 2006. Paying Taxes. The Global Picture. Washington, DC: World Bank and PriceWaterhouseCoopers.Google Scholar
Rabinowitz, V. 1978. ‘The Cuban Nationalisations in the United States Courts: The Sabbatino Case and its Progeny’, in Faundez, J. and Picciotto, S. (eds.), The Nationalisation of Multinationals in Peripheral Economies, 103–31. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Radaelli, C. M. 1997. The Politics of Corporate Taxation in the European Union. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Radaelli, C. M. 2003. ‘The Code of Conduct against Harmful Tax Competition. Open Method of Coordination in Disguise?’, Public Administration, 81: 513–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radice, H. 1975. International Firms and Modern Imperialism: Selected Readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Radice, H. 1984. ‘The National Economy: A Keynesian Myth?’, Capital and Class, 22: 111–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radin, M. J. 1993. Reinterpreting Property. Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Raffaelli, M. 1995. Rise and Demise of Commodity Agreements: An Investigation into the Breakdown of International Commodity Agreements. Cambridge: Woodhead.Google Scholar
Raghavan, C. 1990. Recolonization. GATT, the Uruguay Round and the Third World. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Raikes, P., Larsen, M. F. and Ponte, S. 2000. ‘Global Commodity Chain Analysis and the French Filière Approach: Comparison and Critique’, Economy and Society, 29: 390–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raiser, T. 1988. ‘The Theory of Enterprise Law in the Federal Republic of Germany’, American Journal of Comparative Law, 36: 111–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randall, K. C. 1988. ‘Universal Jurisdiction Under International Law’, Texas Law Review, 66: 785–841.Google Scholar
Rangnekar, D. 2004. The Socio-Economics of Geographical Indications. Geneva: ICTSD–UNCTAD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rangnekar, D. 2010. Geographical Indications and Localisation: A Case Study of Feni. Warwick School of Law.Google Scholar
Ranitz, R. d. 1999. ‘Jan Brinkhof in Conversation with Remco de Ranitz’, European Intellectual Property Reports, 21: 142–46.Google Scholar
Raustiala, K. and Victor, D. G. 2004. ‘The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources’, International Organization, 58: 277–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raymond, E. S. 2000. ‘The Cathedral and the Bazaar’ (www.catb.org).
Raynalds, L. T., Murray, D. and Wilkinson, J. (eds.) 2007. Fair Trade. The Challenges of Transforming Globalization. Abingdon: Routledge.
Reader, W. J. 1975. Imperial Chemicals Industries: A History. Vol. I: The First Quarter-Century. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rearden, W. 2006. ‘“A Delicate Inquiry”: Foreign Policy Concerns Revive the Revenue Rule in the Second Circuit and Bar Foreign Governments from Suing Big Tobacco’, Saint Louis University Law Journal, 51: 203–39.Google Scholar
Redfern, A.Hunter, M., Blackaby, N. and Partasides, C. 2004. Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration. London: Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar
Reed, M. 1999. ‘From the “Cage” to the “Gaze”? The Dynamics of Organizational Control in Late Modernity’, in Morgan, G. and Engwall, L. (eds.), Regulation and Organizations. International Perspectives, 17–49. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Reeve, A. 1986. Property. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reich, A. 1996–7. ‘From Diplomacy to Law: The Juridicization of International Trade Relations’, Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business, 17: 775–849.Google Scholar
Reichman, J. 1992. ‘Legal Hybrids between the Patent and Copyright Paradigms’, in Korthals, W. F. Altes, Domenering, E. J., Hugenholtz, P. B. and Kobel, J. J. C. (eds.), Information Law towards the 21st Century, 325–61. Deventer: Kluwer Law.Google Scholar
Reichman, J. H. 1994. ‘Legal Hybrids Between the Patent and Copyright Paradigms’, Columbia Law Review, 94: 2432–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichman, J. H. 2001. ‘Of Green Tulips and Legal Kudzu: Repackaging Rights in Subpatentable Innovation’, in Dreyfuss, R. C., Zimmerman, D. L. and First, H. (eds.), Expanding the Boundaries of Intellectual Property. Innovation Policy for the Information Society, 23–53. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reichman, J. H. and Dreyfuss, R. C. 2007. ‘Harmonization without Consensus: Critical Reflections on Drafting a Substantive Patent Law Treaty’, Duke Law Journal, 57: 85–130.Google Scholar
Reinhart, C. M. and Rogoff, K. S. 2008. ‘Banking Crises: An Equal Opportunity Menace’ (www.economics.harvard.edu/faculty/rogoff).
Reinhart, C. M. and Rogoff, K. S. 2009. This Time is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Reinicke, W. and Witte, J. M. 2000. ‘Interdependence, Globalization and Sovereignty: The Role of Non-Binding International Legal Accords’, in Shelton, D. (ed.), Commitment and Compliance. The Role of Non-Binding Norms in the International Legal System, 75–100. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reisman, W. M. 1992. Systems of Control in International Adjudication. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Renner, K. 1904. The Institutions of Private Law and their Social Functions. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Revesz, R. 1992. ‘Rehabilitating Interstate Competition: Rethinking the “Race to the Bottom” Rationale for Federal Environmental Regulation’, New York University Law Review, 67: 1210–54.Google Scholar
Rhodes, R. A. W. (ed.) 1997. Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity, Accountability. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Ribstein, L. E. and O'Hara, E. A. 2009. The Law Market. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, J. 1998. Engineering of Consent. Uncovering Corporate PR Strategies. The Cornerhouse.Google Scholar
Richter, J. 2001. Holding Corporations Accountable. Corporate Conduct, International Codes and Citizen Action. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Ricketson, S. 1987. The Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works. Deventer: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Ricketson, S. 1995. ‘The Future of Traditional Intellectual Property Conventions in the Brave New World of Trade-Related Intellectual Property Rights’, International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law, 26: 872–99.Google Scholar
Ricketson, S. 2003. WIPO Study on Limitations and Exceptions of Copyright and Related Rights in the Digital Environment. WIPO Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights.Google Scholar
Ricketson, S. and Ginsburg, J. C. 2006a. International Copyright and Neighbouring Rights: The Berne Convention and Beyond. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ricketson, S. and Ginsburg, J. C. 2006b. ‘Inducers and Authorisers: A Comparison of the US Supreme Court's Grokster Decision and the Australian Federal Court's KaZaa Ruling’, Columbia Public Law and Legal Theory Working Papers 0698: Columbia Law School.
Ridgeway, G. L. 1938. Merchants of Peace: Twenty Years of Business Diplomacy Through the International Chamber of Commerce. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Rittberger, V. (ed.) 1993. Regime Theory and International Relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Ritzer, G. 2008. The McDonaldization of Society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge.Google Scholar
Roberts, S. 1994. ‘Fictitious Capital, Fictitious Spaces: The Geography of Offshore Financial Flows’, in Corbridge, S., Thrift, N. and Martin, R. (eds.), Money, Power and Space, 91–115. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Rochet, J.-C. 2008. Why Are There So Many Banking Crises?: The Politics and Policy of Bank Regulation. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rock, E. B. 2002. ‘Coming to America?: Venture Capital, Corporate Identity and US Securities Law’, Research Papers 02–07: University of Pennsylvania Law School.
Roffe, P. 1998. ‘Control of Anti-Competitive Practices in Contractual Licences under the TRIPs Agreement’, in Correa, C. and Yusuf, A. A. (eds.), Intellectual Property and International Trade: The TRIPs AgreementDeventer: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Rohatgi, R. 2007. Basic International Taxation. Delhi: Taxmann.Google Scholar
Roitman, J. L. 2005. Fiscal Disobedience: An Anthropology of Economic Regulation in Central Africa. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Romeo Casabona, C. M. 1999. Biotechnology, Law, and Bioethics: Comparative Perspectives. Brussels: Bruylant.Google Scholar
Rose, C. M. 1988. ‘The Comedy of the Commons: Custom, Commerce, and Inherently Public Property’, University of Chicago Law Review, 53: 711–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, C. M. 1998. ‘The Several Futures of Property: Of Cyberspace and Folk Tales, Emission Trades and Ecosystems’, Minnesota Law Review, 83: 129–82.Google Scholar
Rose, C. M. 2003. ‘Romans, Roads, and Romantic Creators: Traditions of Public Property in the Information Age’, Law and Contemporary Problems, 66: 89–110.Google Scholar
Rose, M. 2003. ‘Nine-Tenths of the Law: The English Copyright Debates and the Rhetoric of the Public Domain’, Law and Contemporary Problems, 66: 75–87.Google Scholar
Rose, N. and Miller, P. 1992. ‘Political Power Beyond the State: Problematics of Government’, British Journal of Sociology, 43: 173–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, S. 1997. ‘The Role of the World Bank in Controlling Corruption’, Law and Policy in International Business, 29: 93–115.Google Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, S. (ed.) 2006. International Handbook on the Economics of Corruption. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRef
Rosen, R. E. 2003. ‘Risk Management and Corporate Governance: The Case of Enron’, Connecticut Law Review, 35: 1157–84.Google Scholar
Rosenau, J. and Czempiel, E.-O. (eds.) 1992. Governance without Government. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Rosenberg, J. 1994. The Empire of Civil Society. A Critique of the Realist Theory of International Relations. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, J. 2005. ‘Globalization Theory: A Post-Mortem’, International Politics, 42: 2–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, D. E., Knighton, W. M. and RIIA. 1982. National Laws and International Commerce: The Problem of Extraterritoriality. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul for Royal Institute of International AffairsGoogle Scholar
Roy, W. G. 1997. Socializing Capital. The Rise of the Large Industrial Corporation in America. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rubin, G. 2008. ‘Capital Windfall?’, ABA Banking Journal, 100: 46–53.Google Scholar
Ruggie, J. G. 1982. ‘International Regimes, Transactions and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order’, International Organization, 36: 379–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggie, J. G. 2008. Protect, Respect and Remedy: A Framework for Business and Human Rights. United Nations Human Rights Council, Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and other business enterprises.Google Scholar
Ryan, M. P. 1998. Knowledge Diplomacy. Global Competition and the Politics of Intellectual Property. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Safrin, S. 2002. ‘Treaties in Collision? The Biosafety Protocol and the WTO Agreements’, American Journal of International Law, 96: 606–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Safrin, S. 2004. ‘Hyperownership in a Time of Biotechnological Promise: The International Conflict to Control the Building Blocks of Life’, American Journal of International Law, 98: 641–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sagafi-nejad, T. and Dunning, J. H. 2008. The UN and Transnational Corporations: From Code of Conduct to Global Compact. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Saint-Amans, P. and Russo, R. 2010. ‘Amending Protocol Strengthens OECD Mutual Assistance Convention’, Tax Notes International, 58: 1059–77.Google Scholar
Salacuse, J. 1990. ‘BIT by BIT: The Growth of Bilateral Investment Treaties and their Impact on Foreign Investment in Developing Countries’, International Lawyer, 24: 655–75.Google Scholar
Saldias, O. 2007. ‘Supranational Courts as Engines of Disintegration – The Case of the Andean Community’, Berlin Working Paper on European Integration No. 5 Free University of Berlin – Research College ‘The Transformative Power of Europe’.
Sally, R. 1998. Classical Liberalism and International Economic Order. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. 2009. ‘Google Books is Not a Library’, 13 October, Huffington Post.
Samuelson, P. 2010. ‘Google Book Search and the Future of Books in Cyberspace’, UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 1535067.
Samuelson, P., Davis, R., Kapor, M. D. and Reichman, J. H. 1994. ‘A Manifesto Concerning the Legal Protection of Computer Programs’, Columbia Law Review, 94: 2308–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandel, M. 2009. ‘A New Citizenship. The Reith Lectures’ (available from www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00kt7rg).
Santos, B. d. S. 1987. ‘Law, a Map of Misreading: Towards a Postmodern Conception of Law’, Journal of Law and Society, 14: 279–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, B. d. S. 1995. Toward a New Common Sense. Law, Science and Politics in the Paradigmatic Transition. Routledge: London.Google Scholar
Santos, B. d. S. 1998. ‘Participatory Budgeting in Porto Alegre: Toward a Redistributive Democracy’, Politics and Society, 26: 461–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, B. d. S. 2002. Toward a New Legal Common Sense. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Santos, B. d. S. and Rodriguez Garavito, C. A. 2005. Law and Globalization from below: Towards a Cosmopolitan Legality. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapir, A. 1998. ‘The Political Economy of EC Regionalism’, European Economic Review, 42: 717–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauvant, K. P. and Sachs, L. E. (eds.) 2009. The Effect of Treaties on Foreign Direct Investment. Bilateral Investment Treaties, Double Taxation Treaties, and Investment Flows. Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Saville, J. 1956. ‘Sleeping Partnership and Limited Liability, 1850–1856’, Economic History Review (new series), 8: 418–33.Google Scholar
Sayers, R. S. 1976. The Bank of England 1891–1944. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schachter, O. 1984. ‘Compensation for Expropriation’, American Journal of International Law, 78: 121–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schäfer, D. and Waters, R. 2010. ‘HP raided in Moscow over €35m bribes probe’, 15 April, Financial Times.
Schenk, C. R. 1998. ‘The Origins of the Eurodollar Market in London: 1955–1963’, Explorations in Economic History, 35: 221–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schepel, H. 2005. The Constitution of Private Governance: Product Standards in the Regulation of Integrating Markets. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Scherer, F. M. and Weisburst, S. 1995. ‘Economic Effects of Strengthening Pharmaceutical Patent Protection in Italy’, International Review of Intellectual Property and Copyright Law (IIC), 26: 1009–24.Google Scholar
Schiebinger, L. L. 2004. Plants and Empire: Colonial Bioprospecting in the Atlantic World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schiff, E. 1971. Industrialization without National Patents: The Netherlands, 1869–1912, Switzerland, 1850–1907. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schill, S. W. 2008. ‘The Multilateralization of International Investment Law: The Emergence of a Multilateral System of Investment Protection on the Basis of Bilateral Treaties’, Society of International Economic Law (SIEL) Inaugural Conference Paper.
Schill, S. W. 2009. The Multilateralization of International Investment Law. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schinasi, G. J. 2006. Safeguarding Financial Stability. Theory and Practice. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
Schloemann, H. 2008. ‘Brazil Tyres: Policy Space Confirmed under GATT Article XX’, Bridges, 12: 13–15.Google Scholar
Schloemer, E., Li, W., Ernst, K. and Keest, K. 2006. Losing Ground: Foreclosures in the Subprime Market and Their Cost to Homeowners. Center for Responsible Lending.Google Scholar
Schmidt, A. 1971. Les Sociétés d'Auteurs SACEM–SACD: Contrats de Représentation. Paris: Pichon & Durand-Audias.Google Scholar
Schmitter, P. 1996. ‘The Influence of the International Context upon the Choice of National Institutions and Policies in Neo-Democracies’, in Whitehead, L. (ed.), The International Dimensions of Democratization. Europe and the Americas, 26–54. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schmitter, P. C. and Streeck, W. 1991. ‘From National Corporatism to Transnational Pluralism: Organized Interests in the Single European Market’, Politics and Society, 19: 133–64.Google Scholar
Schneiderman, D. 2008. Constitutionalizing Economic Globalization: Investment Rules and Democracy's Promise. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schoenberger, E. 1997. The Cultural Crisis of the Firm. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schoenmaker, D. 2009. ‘The Financial Trilemma in Europe’, Vox.
Schorr, D. K. 2004. Healthy Fisheries, Sustainable Trade. Crafting New Rules on Subsidies in the World Trade Organisation. World Wildlife Fund.Google Scholar
Schroth, P. W. 2002. ‘The United States and the International Bribery Conventions’, American Journal of Comparative Law, 50: 593–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. 1918. ‘The Crisis of the Tax State’, in Swedberg, R. (ed.), The Economics and Sociology of Capitalism. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, C. 1998. ‘The Proceduralization of Telecommunications Law’, Telecommunications Policy, 22: 243–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, C. 2002. ‘Private Regulation of the Public Sector: A Neglected Facet of Contemporary Governance’, Journal of Law and Society, 29: 56–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, J. 1997. Corporate Business and Capitalist Classes. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, J. 2004. ‘International Trade and Environmental Governance: Relating Rules (and Standards) in the EU and the WTO’, European Journal of International Law, 15: 307–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, J. 2009. ‘From Brussels with Love: The Transatlantic Travels of European Law and the Chemistry of Regulatory Attraction’, American Journal of Comparative Law, 57: 897–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seidl-Hohenveldern, I. 1979. ‘International Economic “Soft Law”’, Hague Academy of International Law, Recueil des cours, 163-II: 169–246.Google Scholar
Seidl-Hohenveldern, I. 1987. Corporations in and under International Law. Cambridge: Grotius Publications.Google Scholar
Sell, S. K. 1998. Power and Ideas: North–South Politics of Intellectual Property and Antitrust. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Sell, S. K. 2002. ‘Trips And The Access To Medicines Campaign’, Wisconsin International Law Journal, 20: 481–522.Google Scholar
Sell, S. K. 2003. Private Power, Public Law: The Globalization of Intellectual Property Rights. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Servan-Schreiber, J.-J. 1967. Le Défi Américain. Paris: Denoël.Google Scholar
Seville, C. 2006. The Internationalisation of Copyright Law: Books, Buccaneers, and the Black Flag in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shafer, M. 1983. ‘Capturing the Mineral Multinationals: Advantage or Disadvantage?’, International Organization, 37: 93–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaffer, G. C. 2003. Defending Interests: Public–Private Partnerships in WTO Litigation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Shaffer, G. C., Ratton-Sanchez, M. and Rosenberg, B. 2008. ‘The Trials of Winning at the WTO: What Lies Behind Brazil's Success’, Cornell International Law Journal, 41: 383–502.Google Scholar
Shah, A. (ed.) 2007. Participatory Budgeting. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRef
Shamir, R. 2004. ‘Between Self-Regulation and the Alien Tort Claims Act: On the Contested Concept of Corporate Social Responsibility’, Law and Society Review, 8: 635–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shamir, R. 2008. ‘The Age of Responsibilization: On Market-Embedded Morality’, Economy and Society, 37: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapren, A. J. 2003. ‘Nafta Chapter 11: A Step Forward In International Trade Law Or A Step Backward For Democracy?’, Temple International and Comparative Law Journal, 17: 323–50.Google Scholar
Sharman, J. C. 2006. Havens in a Storm. The Struggle for Global Tax Regulation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Sheets, J. 2000. ‘Copyright Misused: The Impact of the DMCA Anti-Circumvention Measures on Fair and Innovative Markets’, Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal, 22: 1–27.Google Scholar
Shelton, D. (ed.) 2000. Commitment and Compliance. The Role of Non-Binding Norms in the International Legal System. Oxford University Press.
Sheppard, L. A. 2008. ‘How Do US Holders of Swiss Accounts Come Clean? Part 2’, Tax Notes Document Service, 26687.
Sheppard, L. A. and Sullivan, M. A. 2008. ‘Offshore Explorations: Caribbean Hedge Funds, Part 1’, Tax Notes International, 49: 108–18.Google Scholar
Sherman, B. and Bently, L. 1999. The Making of Modern Intellectual Property Law. The British Experience, 1760–1911. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shiller, R. J. 2000. Irrational Exuberance. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shiva, V. 1997. Biopiracy. The Plunder of Nature and Knowledge. Boston South End Press.Google Scholar
Shiva, V. 2001. Protect or Plunder? Understanding Intellectual Property Rights. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Shiva, V. 2007. ‘Biodiversity, Intellectual Property Rights, and Globalization’, in Santos, B. d. S. (ed.), Another Knowledge is Possible. Beyond Northern Epistemologies, 272–87. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Shivji, I. G. 1986. Law, State and the Working Class in Tanzania. London, Dar es Salaam: James Currey, Tanzania Publishing House.Google Scholar
Shukla, S. P. 2000. ‘From GATT to WTO and Beyond’, WP 195 Helsinki: UNU/WIDER.Google Scholar
Sicular, D. R. 2007. ‘The New Look-Through Rule: W(h)ither Subpart F?’, Tax Notes International, 46: 589–623.Google Scholar
Sidak, J. G. 2003. ‘The Failure of Good Intentions: The Worldcom Fraud and the Collapse of American Telecommunications after Deregulation’, Yale Journal on Regulation, 20: 207–67.Google Scholar
Sidak, J. G. and Singer, H. J. 2004. ‘Überregulation without Economics: The World Trade Organization's Decision in the US–Mexico Arbitration on Telecommunications Services’, Federal Communications Law Journal, 57: 1–48.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. 1982. Models of Bounded Rationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A., Egidi, M. and Marris, R. 1992. Economics, Bounded Rationality and the Cognitive Revolution. Aldershot: Elgar.Google Scholar
Simpson, E. 2004. ‘The Ramsay Principle: A Curious Incident of Judicial Reticence’, British Tax Review, 358–74.Google Scholar
Sinacore-Guinn, D. 1993. Collective Administration of Copyright and Neighbouring Rights. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Sinclair, T. J. 2005. The New Masters of Capital: American Bond Rating Agencies and the Politics of Creditworthiness. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
,Singapore 1995. Baring Futures (Singapore) Pte. Ltd: Investigation Pursuant to Section 231 of the Companies Act (Chapter 50) – The Report of the Inspectors appointed by the Minister for Finance. Singapore: Ministry of Finance.Google Scholar
Singh, S. 2000. ‘UN Human Rights Commissioner responds to the WTO. The UN Commissioner for Human Rights has responded to the complaints made to it by the WTO over an expert study on the human rights implications of globalization’, 29 August. Geneva: SUNS.
Skeel, D. A., Jr. 2010. ‘The New Financial Deal: Understanding the Dodd–Frank Act and Its (Unintended) Consequences’, University of Pennsylvania Institute of Law and Economic Research Paper No. 10-21.
Sklar, M. J. 1988. The Corporate Reconstruction of American Capitalism 1890–1916. The Market, Law and Politics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slaughter, A.-M. 1998. ‘Court to Court’, American Journal of International Law, 92: 708–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slaughter-Burley, A.-M. 1993. ‘International Law and International Relations Theory: A Dual Agenda’, American Journal of International Law, 87: 205–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slemrod, J. and Avi-Yonah, R. 2002. ‘(How) Should Trade Agreements Deal With Income Tax Issues?’, Tax Law Review, 51: 533–54.Google Scholar
Smith, M. D. and Telang, R. 2009. ‘Competing with Free: The Impact of Movie Broadcasts on DVD Sales and Internet Piracy’, MIS Quarterly, 33: 321–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smolders, W. 2005. ‘Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture: Facilitated Access or Utility Patents on Plant Varieties?’, IP Strategy Today, 13: 1–17.Google Scholar
Snyder, F. 1981. ‘Anthropology, Dispute Processes, and Law: A Critical Introduction’, British Journal of Law and Society, 8: 141–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, F. 2000. ‘Global Economic Networks and Global Legal Pluralism’, in Bermann, G. A., Herdegen, M. and Lindseth, P. L. (eds.), Transatlantic Regulatory Cooperation, 99–115. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Soederberg, S. 2009. Corporate Power and Ownership in Contemporary Capitalism: The Politics of Resistance and Domination. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sornarajah, M. 2004. The International Law on Foreign Investment. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soros, G. [1987] 2003. The Alchemy of Finance: Reading the Mind of the Market. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Spencer, D. 2007. ‘International Tax Evasion’, Journal of International Taxation, 18: (4) 44–64, (5) 36–48.Google Scholar
Spencer, D. 2010a. ‘International Tax Cooperation. Centrifugal vs. Centripetal Forces’, Journal of International Taxation, 21: (3) 38–51, (4) 46–60.Google Scholar
Spencer, D. 2010b. ‘Climate Is Changing for Exchange of Information’, International Tax Review, 21: (6) 1–3.Google Scholar
Spencer, D. and Sharman, J. C. 2006. ‘OECD Proposals on Harmful Tax Practices. A Status Report’, Journal of International Taxation, 17: (10) 3–20, (11) 32–39.Google Scholar
Spengel, C. and Wendt, C. 2007. ‘A Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base for Multinational Companies in the European Union, Some Issues and Options’, WP 0717: Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation.
Srinivas, K. R. 2006. ‘Intellectual Property Rights and Bio Commons: Open Source and Beyond’, International Social Science Journal, 58: 319–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steger, D. P. 2002. ‘The Appellate Body and its Contribution to WTO Dispute Settlement’, in Kennedy, D. L. M. and Southwick, J. D. (eds.), The Political Economy of International Trade Law. Essays in Honor of Robert E. Hudec, 482–95. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Steil, B. (ed.) 1994. International Financial Market Regulation. Chichester: Wiley.
Stein, E. 1981. ‘Lawyers, Judges, and the Making of a Transnational Constitution’, American Journal of International Law, 75: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, H. J. and Vagts, D. F. 1968. Transnational Legal Problems: Materials and Text. Mineola, NY: Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Steinmo, S. 1993. Taxation and Democracy: Swedish, British, and American Approaches to Financing the Modern State. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
,STEP (ed.) 2006. Beyond the Level Playing Field?: Society of Trusts and Estates Practitioners.
Sterckx, S. 2000. Biotechnology, Patents and Morality. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Sterckx, S. 2010. ‘Is the Non-Patentability of “Essentially Biological Processes” Under Threat?’, Journal of World Intellectual Property, 13: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterckx, S. and Cockbain, J. 2010. ‘The Patentability of Computer Programs in Europe: An Improved Interpretation of Articles 52(2) and (3) of the European Patent Convention’, Journal of World Intellectual Property, 13: 366–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevis, D. 2010. International Framework Agreements and Global Social Dialogue: Parameters and Prospects. Employment Working Paper No. 47. ILO Employment Sector.Google Scholar
Stewart, J. B. 1991. Den of Thieves. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Stewart, K. and Webb, M. 2006. ‘International Competition in Corporate Taxation: Evidence from The OECD Time Series’, Economic Policy, 21: 153–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, M. and Jogarajan, S. 2004. ‘The International Monetary Fund and Tax Reform’, British Tax Review, 146–74.
Stewart, T. P. (ed.) 1993. The GATT Uruguay Round. A Negotiating History. The Hague: Kluwer.
Stigler, G. J. 1971. ‘The Theory of Economic Regulation’, Bell Journal of Economics, 2: 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, J. E. 1998. ‘More Instruments and Broader Goals: Moving Towards the Post-Washington Consensus’. The 1998 WIDER Annual Lecture, Helsinki, Finland.
Stiglitz, J. E. 2002. Globalization and Its Discontents. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J. E. 2008. ‘Regulating Multinational Corporations: Towards Principles of Cross-Border Legal Frameworks in a Globalized World Balancing Rights with Responsibilities’, American University International Law Review, 23: 451–558.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J. E. and Chang, H.-J. 2001. Joseph Stiglitz and the World Bank: The Rebel within: Selected Speeches. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
Stocking, G. W. and Watkins, M. W. 1946. Cartels in Action: Case Studies in International Business Diplomacy. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.Google Scholar
Stocking, G. W. and Watkins, M. W. 1948. Cartels or Competition?: The Economics of International Controls by Business and Government. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.Google Scholar
Stone, K. 1996. ‘Labour in the Global Economy. Four Approaches to Transnational Labour Regulation’, in Bratton, W., McCahery, J., Picciotto, S. and Scott, C. (eds.), International Regulatory Competition and Coordination, 445–77. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Story, J. 1997. ‘Globalisation, the European Union, and German Financial Reform: The Political Economy of “Finanzplatz Deutschland”’, in Underhill, G. R. D. (ed.), The New World Order in International Finance, 245–73. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Strandburg, K. J. 2009. ‘Evolving Innovation Paradigms and the Global Intellectual Property Regime’, Connecticut Law Review, 41: 861–920.Google Scholar
Strange, S. 1986. Casino Capitalism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Strowel, A. and Doutrelepont, C. 1989. ‘La socialisation du droit d'auteur a travers la généralisation des licences non volontaires: Un danger ou une nécessité?’, Revue Interdisciplinaire d'Etudes Juridiques, 22: 133–48.Google Scholar
Sullivan, M. A. 2004a. ‘With Billions at Stake, Glaxo puts US APA Program on Trial’, Tax Notes International Magazine, 34: 456–63.Google Scholar
Sullivan, M. A. 2004b. ‘Large Banks Keep More Profits in Tax Havens’, Tax Notes International, 34: 1379–86.Google Scholar
Sullivan, M. A. 2007. ‘Sex, Drugs and Tax Evasion’, Tax Notes International, 46: 1291–4.Google Scholar
Sulston, J. and Ferry, G. 2002. The Common Thread. Science, Politics, Ethics and the Human Genome. London: Bantam.Google Scholar
Sumption, A. 1982 Taxation of Overseas Income and Gains. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Sutherland, P. F. 1979. ‘The World Bank Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 28: 367–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swank, D. and Steinmo, S. 2002. ‘The New Political Economy of Taxation in Advanced Capitalist Democracies’, American Journal of Political Science, 46: 642–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Switzerland–USA 2009. ‘Agreement between the Swiss Confederation and the USA on the request from the Internal Revenue Service for information regarding UBS AG, a corporation established under the law of the Swiss Confederation’ (www.ejpd.admin.ch).
Sykes, A. 2000. ‘The Remedy for Breach of Obligations under the WTO DSU: Damages or Specific Performance?’, in Bronckers, M. and Quick, R. (eds.), New Directions in International Economic Law, Essays in Honour of John H. Jackson, 347–57. The Hague: Kluwer Law.Google Scholar
Szeftel, M. 1998. ‘Misunderstanding African Politics: Corruption and the Governance Agenda’, Review of African Political Economy, 25: 221–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanzi, V. 1987. ‘Quantitative Characteristics of the Tax Systems of Developing Countries’, in Newbery, D. and Stern, N. (eds.), The Theory of Taxation for Developing Countries. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tanzi, V. 1995. Taxation in an Integrating World. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Tarbell, I. M. and Chalmers, D. M. [1904] 1966. The History of the Standard Oil Company: Briefer Version. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Tarschys, D. 2001. ‘Wealth, Values, Institutions: Trends in Government and Governance’, in OECD (ed.), Governance in the 21st Century, Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 27–41.Google Scholar
Tarullo, D. K. 2002. ‘The Hidden Costs of International Dispute Settlement: WTO Review of Domestic Anti-Dumping Decisions’, Law and Policy in International Business, 34: 109–81.Google Scholar
Taylor, W. 1991. ‘The Logic of Global Business: An Interview with ABB's Percy Barnevik’, Harvard Business Review, 69: 90–105.Google Scholar
Temin, P. 1979. ‘Technology, Regulation and Market Structure in the Modern Pharmaceutical Industry’, Bell Journal of Economics, 10: 429–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tett, G. 2009. Fool's Gold. How Unrestrained Greed Corrupted a Dream, Shattered Global Markets and Unleashed a Catastrophe. London: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Teubner, G. 1983. ‘Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law’, Law and Society Review, 17: 239–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teubner, G. 1987. ‘Juridification – Concepts, Aspects, Limits, Solutions’, in Teubner, G. (ed.), Juridification of Social Spheres. A Comparative Analysis in the Areas of Labor, Corporate, Antitrust and Social Welfare Law, 3–49. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Teubner, G. 1988. ‘Enterprise Corporatism: New Industrial Policy and the ‘Essence’ of the Legal Person’, American Journal of Comparative Law, 36: 130–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teubner, G. 1992. ‘The Two Faces of Janus: Rethinking Legal Pluralism’, Cardozo Law Review, 13: 1443–62.Google Scholar
Teubner, G. (ed.) 1997. Global Law without a State. Aldershot: Dartmouth.
Teubner, G. 2002. ‘Breaking Frames. Economic Globalization and the Emergence of Lex Mercatoria’, European Journal of Social Theory, 5: 199–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teubner, G. 2004. ‘Global Private Regimes: Neo-Spontaneous Law and Dual Constitution of Autonomous Sectors?’, in Ladeur, K.-H. (ed.), Public Governance in the Age of Globalization, 71–88. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Therien, J. R. 2001. ‘Exorcising the Specter of a “Pay-Per-Use” Society: Toward Preserving Fair Use and the Public Domain in the Digital Age’, Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 16: 979–1043.Google Scholar
Thomson, J. E. and Krasner, S. D. 1989. ‘Global Transactions and the Consolidation of Sovereignty’, in Czempiel, E.-O. and Rosenau, J. N. (eds.), Global Changes and Theoretical Challenges. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Tiebout, C. M. 1956. ‘A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures’, Journal of Political Economy, 64: 416–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tietje, C. 2002. ‘Global Governance and Inter-Agency Cooperation in International Economic Law’, Journal of World Trade, 36: 501–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timberg, S. 1955. ‘Restrictive Business Practices as an Appropriate Subject for United Nations Action’, Antitrust Bulletin, 1: 409–40.Google Scholar
,TIP Expert Group 2008. Toward a New Era of Intellectual Property: From Confrontation to Negotiation. The Innovation Partnership, International Expert Group on Biotechnology, Innovation and Intellectual Property.Google Scholar
Tollefson, C. 2002. ‘Games Without Frontiers: Investor Claims and Citizen Submissions Under the Nafta Regime’, Yale Journal of International Law, 27: 141–90.Google Scholar
Touraine, A. 1971. The Post-Industrial Society. Tomorrow's Social History. London: Wildwood House.Google Scholar
,TRAC 2000. Tangled Up in Blue. Corporate Partnerships at the United Nations. Transnational Resource and Action Centre.Google Scholar
Trachtman, J. P. 1994. ‘Conflict of Laws and Accuracy in the Allocation of Government Responsibility’, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 26: 975–1057.Google Scholar
Trachtman, J. P. 1996. ‘The International Economic Law Revolution’, University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law, 17: 33–61.Google Scholar
Trachtman, J. P. 1998. ‘Case-Note: EC – Customs Classification of Certain Computer Equipment’, European Journal of International Law, 9: 551–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trachtman, J. P. 1999. ‘The Domain of WTO Dispute-Resolution’, Harvard International Law Journal, 40: 333–77.Google Scholar
Treanor, J. and Tran, M. 1998. ‘Markets in turmoil: rescued hedge fund was “leveraged 250 times”’, 10 October, Guardian.
Tshuma, L. 1999. ‘The Political Economy of the World Bank's Legal Framework for Development’, Social and Legal Studies, 8: 75–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, A. 2009. A Regulatory Response to the Global Banking Crisis. London: Financial Services Authority.Google Scholar
Turner, G. 2008. The Credit Crunch: Housing Bubbles, Globalisation and the Worldwide Economic Crisis. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
,TWIN–SAL 1999. ‘Enough is Enough’, Economiquity, 2–4.Google Scholar
Tyler, M. 1998. The Changing Role of Government in an Era of Telecommunications Deregulation. Geneva: International Telecommunications Union, 7th Regulatory Colloquium.Google Scholar
,UK Company Law Review Steering Group 2000. Modern Company Law for a Competitive Economy: Developing the Framework. Department for Business Innovation and Skills.Google Scholar
,UK Inland Revenue 1967–77. Review of Tax Havens 2. Public Records Office File IR40/16744. London.Google Scholar
,UK Law Commission 1997. Legislating the Criminal Code: Corruption. London: Law Commission.Google Scholar
,UK Law Commission 2008. Reforming Bribery. LC 313.
,UK Parliament 2009. Draft Bribery Bill: Report of the Joint Committee, Oral and Written Evidence. HL Paper 115-II, HC 430-II. London.Google Scholar
,UK Treasury Committee 2008a. Financial Stability and Transparency. HC 371. London: House of Commons Treasury Committee.Google Scholar
,UK Treasury Committee 2008b. The Run on the Rock. HC 56–I. London: House of Commons Treasury Committee.Google Scholar
,United Nations 1974. The Impact of Multinational Corporations on Development and on International Relations. E/5500 rev.1. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
,United Nations 1983. Draft Code of Conduct on TNCs. Official Records of the Economic and Social Council, 1983, Supplement No. 7 (E/1983/17/Rev. 1), Annex II.Google Scholar
,UN Commission on Human Rights 2000. Globalization and its impact on the full enjoyment of human rights. Preliminary report submitted by J. Oloka-Onyango and Deepika Udagama, in accordance with Sub-Commission resolution 1999/8. E/CN.4/Sub.2/2000/13. Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights.Google Scholar
,UN Commission on Human Rights 2004. The right of everyone to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. Report of the Special Rapporteur, Paul Hunt. E/CN.4/2004/49.
,UN High Commissioner for Human Rights 2001. The impact of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights on human rights. E/CN.4/Sub.2/2001/13.
,UN High Commissioner for Human Rights 2002a. Globalization and its impact on the full enjoyment of human rights. E/CN.4/2002/54.
,UN High Commissioner for Human Rights 2002b. Liberalization of trade in services and human rights. E/CN.4/Sub.2/2002/9.
,UN High Commissioner for Human Rights 2003. Human rights, trade and investment. E/CN.4/Sub.2/2003/9.
,UN High Commissioner for Human Rights 2004a. Analytical study of the High Commissioner for Human Rights on the fundamental principle of participation and its application in the context of globalization. E/CN.4/2005/41.
,UN High Commissioner for Human Rights 2004b. Analytical study of the High Commissioner for Human Rights on the fundamental principle of non-discrimination in the context of globalization. E/CN.4/2004/40.
,UN Security Council 2001. Report of the Panel of Experts Pursuant to Security Council resolution 1343 (2001), paragraph 19, concerning Liberia. S/2001/1015. New York.Google Scholar
,United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (ed.) 1996a. International Investment Instruments: A Compendium. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
,United Nations Conference on Trade and Development 1996b. Incentives and Foreign Direct Investment. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
,United Nations Conference on Trade and Development 1997. Transfer Pricing Regulations and Transnational Corporation Practices: Guidance for Developing Countries. TD/B/ITNC/AC1(XIV)/CRP.2/Rev1. Geneva: Intergovernmental Working Group of Experts on International Standards of Accounting and Reporting.Google Scholar
,United Nations Conference on Trade and Development 2000. Tax Incentives and Foreign Direct Investment. A Global Survey. ASIT Advisory Studies No. 16. Geneva.Google Scholar
,United Nations Conference on Trade and Development 2004. World Investment Report. The Shift Towards Services. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
,United Nations Conference on Trade and Development 2005. Investor–State Disputes Arising from Investment Treaties: A Review. UNCTAD/ITE/IIT/2005/4. Geneva.Google Scholar
,United Nations Conference on Trade and Development 2009. Latest Developments in Investor–State Dispute Settlement. UNCTAD/WEB/DIAE/IIA/2009/6.
,UNCTAD–ICTSD 2005. Resource Book on TRIPs and Development. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Underhill, G. R. D. (ed.) 1997. The New World Order in International Finance. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRef
,US Congress 1975. Covert Action in Chile 1963–73 (the Church Report). US GPO 63–372. Staff Report of the Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities.Google Scholar
,US Congress 2003. Staff Report of Investigation of Enron Corporation and Related Entities Regarding Federal Tax and Compensation Issues, and Policy Recommendations. JCS-3–03. Joint Committee on Taxation.Google Scholar
,US GAO 2006. Company Formations. Minimal Ownership Information is Collected and Available. GAO–06–376. Washington, DC: Government Accountability Office.Google Scholar
,US GAO 2007. Risk-Based Capital: Bank Regulators Need to Improve Transparency and Overcome Impediments to Finalizing the Proposed Basel II Framework. GAO–07–253. Washington, DC: Government Accountability Office.Google Scholar
,US GAO 2008. Tax Administration. Comparison of Reported Tax Liabilities of Foreign – and US-Controlled Corporations, 1998–2005. GAO–08–957. Washington, DC: Government Accountability Office.Google Scholar
,US IRS 1984. Sources of Information from Abroad. Doc. 6743 (Rev.4–84) T22.2 IN 3. Washington, DC: Internal Revenue Service.Google Scholar
,US Senate 1983 Crime and Secrecy: The Use of Offshore Banks and Companies. Staff Study. Print, S.98–21. Washington, DC: Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs, Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations.Google Scholar
,US Senate 2006. Tax Haven Abuses: The Enablers, the Tools and Secrecy. Washington, DC: Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations of the Committee on Homeland and Security Affairs.Google Scholar
,US Senate 2008. Tax Haven Banks and US Tax Compliance. Washington, DC: Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations.Google Scholar
,US Treasury 1981. Tax Havens and their Use by United States Taxpayers – An Overview (Gordon report). A report by Richard A. Gordon, the Special Counsel for International Taxation, to the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, the Assistant Attorney General (Tax Division) and the Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (Tax Policy).
,US Treasury 2008. Blueprint for a Modernized Financial Regulatory Structure. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Vaidhyanathan, S. 2007. ‘The Googlization of Everything and the Future of Copyright’, University of California Davis Law Review, 40: 1207–31.Google Scholar
Vaitsos, C. 1970. ‘Bargaining and the Distribution of Returns in the Purchase of Technology by Developing Countries’, Bulletin of the Institute of Development Studies, 3: 16–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaitsos, C. V. 1974. Intercountry Income Distribution and Transnational Enterprises. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Pijl, K. 1998. Transnational Classes and International Relations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Eeckhaute, J. C. 1999. ‘Private Complaints against Unfair Trade Practices. The EC's Trade Barriers Regulation’, Journal of World Trade, 33: 199–213.Google Scholar
Harten, G. 2007. Investment Treaty Arbitration and Public Law. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harten, G. and Loughlin, M. 2006. ‘Investment Treaty Arbitration as a Species of Global Administrative Law’, European Journal of International Law, 17: 121–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Overwalle, G. (ed.) 2009. Gene Patents and Collaborative Licensing Models. Patent Pools, Clearinghouses, Open Source Models and Liability Regimes. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Overwalle, G., Zimmeren, E. v., Verbeure, B. and Matthijs, G. 2006. ‘Models for Facilitating Access to Patents on Genetic Inventions’, Nature Reviews Genetics, 7: 143–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zyl, A. 2010. What is Wrong with the Constituency Development Funds?International Budget Partnership.Google Scholar
Vandevelde, K. J. 1998a. ‘Investment Liberalization and Economic Development: The Role of Bilateral Investment Treaties’, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 36: 501–27.Google Scholar
Vandevelde, K. J. 1998b. ‘The Political Economy of a Bilateral Investment Treaty’, American Journal of International Law, 92: 621–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verbeure, B. 2009. ‘Patent Pooling for Gene-Based Diagnostic Testing: Conceptual Framework’, in Overwalle, G. (ed.), Gene Patents and Collaborative Licensing Models. Patent Pools, Clearinghouses, Open Source Models and Liability Regimes, 3–32. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vernon, R. 1971. Sovereignty at Bay: The Multinational Spread of US Enterprises. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Vincent-Jones, P. 1999. ‘The Regulation of Contractualisation in Quasi-Markets for Public Services’, Public Law, 1–31.Google Scholar
Vitols, S. 2001. ‘Varieties of Corporate Governance: Comparing Germany and the UK’, in Hall, P. A. and Soskice, D. (eds.), Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vogel, D. 1995. Trading Up. Consumer and Environmental Regulation in a Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Vogel, D. 2005. The Market for Virtue. the Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Vogel, S. K. 1996. Freer Markets, More Rules. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Volcker, P., Goldstone, R. and Pieth, M. 2005. Manipulation of the Oil-for-Food Programme by the Iraqi Regime. New York: Independent Inquiry Committee into the United Nations Oil-for-Food Programme (www.iic-offp.org).Google Scholar
Hippel, E. 2005. Democratizing Innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lewinsky, S. (ed.) 2008. Indigenous Heritage and Intellectual Property: Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore. London: Kluwer Law International.
Vos, E. 1999. Institutional Frameworks of Community Health and Safety Legislation. Committees, Agencies and Private Bodies. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Wade, R. 1994. ‘The East Asian Miracle: Why the Controversy Continues’, in UNCTAD (ed.), International Monetary and Financial Issues, 65–79. Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.Google Scholar
Wade, R. 1996. ‘Japan, The World Bank, and the Art of Paradigm Maintenance: The East Asian Miracle in Political Perspective’, New Left Review, 217: 3–36.Google Scholar
Wälde, T. W. (ed.) 1996. The Energy Charter Treaty. An East–West Gateway for Investment and Trade. London: Kluwer.
Waldron, J. 1988. The Right to Private Property. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Walker, S. 2006. ‘A Human Rights Approach to the TRIPs Agreement’, in Abbott, F. M., Breining-Kaufmann, C. and Cottier, T. (eds.), International Trade and Human Rights, 171–9. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Wall, J. F. 1990. Alfred I. Du Pont. The Man and his Family. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Warbrick, C. 2007. ‘Recent Developments in UK Extradition Law’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 56: 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, H. and Lee, B. 2003. Corporate Responsibility and the Future of the International Trade and Investment Agenda. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.Google Scholar
Waris, A. 2009. ‘Solving the fiscal crisis: legitimising taxation through realisation of human rights in Kenya’, Ph.D. thesis in law: Lancaster University.
Waterman, P. 1988. The Old Internationalism and the New. The Hague: ILERI Foundation.Google Scholar
Waters, R. 2007. ‘Amazon settles suit’, 9 May, Financial Times.
Watson, A. 1974. Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
Watson, A. 1992. The Evolution of International Society. London: RKP.Google Scholar
Watson, A. 1993. Legal Transplants: An Approach To Comparative Law. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Webb, K. and Morrison, A. 2004. ‘The Law and Voluntary Codes: Examining the “Tangled Web”’, in Webb, K. (ed.), Voluntary Codes: Private Governance, the Public Interest and Innovation, 97–174. Ottawa: Carleton Research Unit for Innovation Science and Environment Carleton University.Google Scholar
Webb, K. R. 2004. Voluntary Codes: Private Governance, the Public Interest and Innovation. Ottawa: Carleton Research Unit for Innovation Science and Environment Carleton University.Google Scholar
Weber, M., Roth, G. and Wittich, C. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weber, S. 2004. The Success of Open Source. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Weber-Fas, R. 1968 ‘Corporate Residence Rules for International Tax Jurisdiction: A Study of American and German Law’, Harvard Journal on Legislation, 5: 175–251.Google Scholar
Wedderburn, K. W. 1985. ‘The Legal Development of Corporate Responsibility’, in Hopt, K. J. and Teubner, G. (eds.), Corporate Governance and Directors' Liabilities. Legal, Economic, and Sociological Analyses on Corporate Social Responsibility, 3–54. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wegner, H. C. 1993. Patent Harmonization. London: Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar
Weiler, J. H. H. 1991. ‘The Transformation of Europe’, Yale Law Journal, 100: 267–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiler, J. H. H. 1995. ‘Does Europe Need a New Constitution? Demos, Telos and the German Maastricht Decision’, European Law Journal, 1: 219–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiler, J. H. H. 2001. ‘The Rule of Lawyers and the Ethos of Diplomats – Reflections on the Internal and External Legitimacy of WTO Dispute Settlement’, Journal of World Trade, 35: 191–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiler, T. 2000. ‘International Regulatory Reform Obligations’, Journal of World Trade, 34: 71–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiner, J. M. 2008. ‘Icelandic Bank Failure Reveals Tax Haven Links’, Tax Notes International, 52: 443–55.Google Scholar
Weiner, J. M. 2009. ‘Is Switzerland a Tax Haven?’, Tax Notes International, 54: 356–60.Google Scholar
Weinstein, A. J. 1968. The Corporate Ideal in the Liberal State 1900–1918. Boston, MA: Beacon.Google Scholar
Weiss, L. (ed.) 2003. States in the Global Economy. Bringing Domestic Institutions Back In. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Wellink, N. 2008. ‘Recent market turmoil – implications for supervisors and risk managers’, Remarks by Dr Nout Wellink, President of the Netherlands Bank and Chairman of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, at the GARP 2008 9th Annual Risk Management Convention and Exhibition, New York: BCBS.
Wells, W. 2003. Antitrust and the Formation of the Postwar World. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Weston, B. H., Lillich, R. B. and Bederman, D. J. 1999. International Claims: Their Settlement by Lump Sum Agreements, 1975–1995. Ardsley, NY: Transnational Publishers.Google Scholar
Wheeler, D., Fabig, H. and Boele, R. 2002. ‘Paradoxes and Dilemmas for Stakeholder Responsive Firms in the Extractive Sector: Lessons from the Case of Shell and the Ogoni’, Journal of Business Ethics, 39: 297–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L. J. 2009. ‘The Credit-Rating Agencies and the Subprime Debacle’, Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society, 21: 389–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, R. A. 2004. Breaking Silence. The Case that Changed the Face of Human Rights. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Whitehead, L. (ed.) 1996. The International Dimensions of Democratization. Europe and the Americas. Oxford University Press.
,WHO–CIPIH 2006. Public Health. Innovation and Intellectual Property Rights. Geneva: World Health Organization, Commission on Intellectual Property Rights, Innovation and Public Health.Google Scholar
Wilkins, M. 1998. ‘Multinational Enterprises and Economic Change’, Australian Economic History Review, 38: 103–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, B. 2000. ‘Comment, Is Shell Report 2000's Sustainable Development Focus an Anomaly or Sign of the Future?’, Oil and Gas Journal, 98: 74–6.Google Scholar
Williams, J. 1986. The Economic Function of Futures Markets. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, S. 2008. ‘The BAE/Saudi Al-Yamamah Contracts: Implications in Law and Public Procurement’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 57: 200–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, J. 1999. ‘Whether and When to Liberalize Capital Account and Financial Services’, Staff Working Papers ERAD 99–03 Geneva: WTO.
Williamson, O. 1985 The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. London: Collier-Macmillan.Google Scholar
,Wilson Committee 1980. Committee to Review the Functioning of Financial Institutions. Cmnd 7937. London: UK Government.Google Scholar
Winickoff, D., Jasanoff, S., Busch, L., Grove-White, R. and Wynne, B. 2005. ‘Adjudicating the GM Food Wars: Science, Risk, and Democracy in World Trade Law’, Yale Journal of International Law, 30: 81–123.Google Scholar
Winter, G. 1992. ‘Patent Law Policy in Biotechnology’, Journal of Environmental Law, 4: 167–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, M. 2007. ‘Why the credit squeeze is a turning point for the world’, 11 December, Financial Times.
Wolfe, R. 2005a. ‘Decision-Making and Transparency in the “Medieval” WTO: Does the Sutherland Report have the Right Prescription?’, Journal of International Economic Law, 8: 631–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, R. 2005b. ‘See You in Geneva? Legal (Mis)Representations of the Trading System’, European Journal of International Relations, 11: 339–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodmansee, M. 1984. ‘The Genius and the Copyright: Economic and Legal Conditions of the Emergence of the “Author”’, Eighteenth-Century Studies, 17: 425–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woods, N. 2006. The Globalizers: The IMF, the World Bank, and their Borrowers. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Woolcock, S. 1996. ‘Competition Among Rules in the Single European Market’, in Bratton, W., McCahery, J., Picciotto, S. and Scott, C. (eds.), International Regulatory Competition and Coordination. Perspectives on Economic Regulation in Europe and the United States, 289–321. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Woolf, L. S. 1916. International government; two reports by L. S. Woolf prepared for the Fabian Research Department, together with a project by a Fabian Committee for a supernational authority that will prevent war. London: Fabian Society.Google Scholar
,World Bank 1983. World Development Report. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
,World Bank 1988. World Development Report. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
,World Bank 1993. The East Asian Miracle. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
,World Bank 2005. Global Economic Prospects 2005: Trade, Regionalism and Development. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
,WTO Consultative Board 2004. The Future of the WTO. Geneva: World Trade Organization.Google Scholar
Wuerth, I. 2009. ‘Wiwa v. Shell: The $15.5 Million Settlement’, ASIL Insights, 13 (14).Google Scholar
Wynne, B. 1992. ‘Risk and Social Learning’, in Krimsky, S. and Golding, D. (eds.), Social Theories of Risk, 275–97. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
Xanthaki., H. 2001. ‘Centros: Is This Really the End for the Theory of the Siège Réel’, Company Lawyer, 22: 2–8.Google Scholar
Xiao, G. 1998. ‘Reforming the Governance Structure of China's State-Owned Enterprises’, Public Administration and Development, 18: 273–80.3.0.CO;2-T>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeung, H. W.-C. 1998. Transnational Corporations and Business Networks: Hong Kong Firms in the ASEAN Region. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Yi, Y.-J. 2004. ‘Standards and science in trade regulation in the global age: a critique of the WTO SPS Agreement in relation to public health and safety concerns’, Ph.D. thesis in law: Lancaster University.
Yntema, H. E. 1953. ‘The Historic Bases of Private International Law’, American Journal of Comparative Law, 2: 297–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yntema, H. E. 1966. ‘The Comity Doctrine’, Michigan Law Review, 65: 9–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, A. K. 1979. The Sogo Shosha: Japan's Multinational Trading Companies. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Young, M. A. 2007. ‘The WTO'S Use of Relevant Rules of International Law: An Analysis of the Biotech Case’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 56: 907–30.Google Scholar
Young, M. A. 2009. ‘Fragmentation or Interaction: The WTO, Fisheries Subsidies and International Law’, World Trade Review, 8: 477–515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, M. A. (ed.) 2011. Regime Interaction in International Law. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Zaki, M. 2004. ‘Face à Londres, la Suisse se positionne comme place “proper” pour les trusts’, 22 November, Geneva, Le Temps.
Zammit, A. and Utting, P. 2006. Beyond Pragmatism: Appraising UN – Business Partnerships. Geneva: UN Research Institute for Social Development.Google Scholar
Zapatero, P. 2009. ‘Legal Imagination in Vitoria: The Power of Ideas’, Journal of the History of International Law, 11: 221–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zee, H. H. 1996. ‘Empirics of Cross-country Tax Revenue Comparisons’, World Development, 24: 1659–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zee, H. H., Stotsky, J. G. and Ley, E. 2002. ‘Tax Incentives for Business Investment: A Primer for Policy Makers in Developing Countries’, World Development, 30: 1497–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeile, W. J. 1997. ‘US Intrafirm Trade in Goods’, Survey of Current Business, February, 23–38.Google Scholar
Zhang, P. G. 1995. Barings Bankruptcy and Financial Derivatives. Singapore: World Scientific.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zoller, E. 1985. ‘Remedies for Unfair Trade: European and United States Views’, Cornell International Law Journal, 18: 227–45.Google Scholar
Zukin, S. and DiMaggio, P. (eds.) 1990. Structures of Capital. The Social Organization of the Economy. Cambridge University Press.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Sol Picciotto, Lancaster University
  • Book: Regulating Global Corporate Capitalism
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511792625.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Sol Picciotto, Lancaster University
  • Book: Regulating Global Corporate Capitalism
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511792625.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Sol Picciotto, Lancaster University
  • Book: Regulating Global Corporate Capitalism
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511792625.012
Available formats
×