Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T05:19:54.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  aN Invalid Date NaN

Edited by
Melanie Fink
Melanie Fink
Affiliation:
Leiden University
Type
Chapter
Information
Redressing Fundamental Rights Violations by the EU
The Promise of the ‘Complete System of Remedies'
 , pp. 431 - 460
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This content is Open Access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/cclicenses/

References

Aalto, P, Public Liability in EU Law: Brasserie, Bergaderm and Beyond (Hart 2011).Google Scholar
Abbasy, M, ‘The Online Civil Money Claim: Litigation, ADR and ODR in One Single Dispute Resolution Process’ (2020) 7 International Journal of Online Dispute Resolution 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackermann, B, ‘Good-Bye, Montesquieu’ in Rose-Ackerman, Susan, Emerson, Blake, and Lindseth, Peter (eds), Comparative Administrative Law (2nd edn, Edward Elgar 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adam, C and Others, Taking the EU to Court. Annulment Proceedings and Multilevel Judicial Conflict (Palgrave 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alberti, J, ‘The Position of Boards of Appeal: Between Functional Continuity and Independence’ in Chamon, Merijn and Eliantonio, Mariolina (eds), Boards of Appeal of EU Agencies (Oxford University Press 2022).Google Scholar
Alonso de León, S, ‘Composite Administrative Procedures in the European Union’ (PhD thesis, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid 2016).Google Scholar
Alter, K, Establishing the Supremacy of European Law: The Making of an International Rule of Law in Europe (Oxford University Press 2001).Google Scholar
Ambrose, C, ‘Arbitration and the Free Movement of Judgments’ (2003) 19(1) Arbitration International Law 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, D and Demetriou, M, References to the European Court (2nd edn, Sweet & Maxwell 2002).Google Scholar
Andersen, E, Out of the Closets and into the Courts: Legal Opportunity Structure and Gay Rights Litigation (University of Michigan Press 2006).Google Scholar
Anderson, T, Schum, D, and Twining, W, Analysis of Evidence (Cambridge University Press 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andone, C and Coman-Kund, F, ‘A Legal-Argumentative Framework for Persuasive EU Soft Law: The Case of the European Commission’s Recommendations’, in Láncos, Petra, Xanthoulis, Napoleon, and Jiménez, Luis Arroyo (eds), The Legal Effects of EU Soft Law: Theory, Language and Sectoral Insights into EU Multi-level Governance (Edward Elgar 2023).Google Scholar
Arestis, G, ‘Fundamental rights in the EU: three years after Lisbon, the Luxembourg perspective’ (Cooperative Research Paper 02/2013, College of Europe).Google Scholar
Aristova, E and Grusic, U, ‘Introduction: Civil Remedies and Human Rights in Flux’ in Aristova, Ekaterina and Grusic, Ugljesa (eds), Civil Remedies and Human Rights in Flux: Key Legal Developments in Selected Jurisdictions (1st edn, Hart 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnull, A, ‘EU Recommendations and Judicial Review’ (2018) 14 European Constitutional Law Review 609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnull, A, ‘Article 47 CFR and national procedural autonomy’ (2020) 45 European Law Review 681.Google Scholar
Arrigioni, M, ‘The Administrative Board of Review of the European Central Bank: A Critical Analysis’ [2020] Rivista Orizzonti del Diritto Commerciale 519.Google Scholar
Arroyo Jiménez, L, ‘Effective Judicial Protection and Mutual Recognition in the European Administrative Space’ (2021) 22 German Law Journal 344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asimov, M, ‘Five Models of Administrative Adjudication’ (2015) 63 The American Journal of Comparative Law 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayres, I and Braithwaite, J, Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate (Oxford University Press 1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azimi, A and Others, ‘The Crotone Cover Up’ (Lighthouse Reports, 2 June 2023) <www.lighthousereports.com/investigation/the-crotone-cover-up/>..>Google Scholar
Azoulai, L and Vries, K M de (eds), EU Migration Law: Legal Complexities and Political Rationales (Oxford University Press 2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backes, C and Eliantonio, M (eds), Cases, Materials and Text on Judicial Review of Administrative Action (Hart 2019).Google Scholar
Baldaccini, A, ‘Counter-Terrorism and the EU Strategy for Border Security: Framing Suspects with Biometric Documents and Databases’ (2008) 10 European Journal of Migration and Law 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, R, Cave, M, and Lodge, M, ‘Responsive Regulation’ in Baldwin, Robert and Others (eds), Understanding Regulation: Theory, Strategy, and Practice (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardutzky, S, ‘Constitutional Courts, Preliminary Rulings and the “New Form of Law”: The Adjudication of the European Stability Mechanism’ (2016) 16 German Law Journal 1771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barents, R, ‘EU Procedural Law and Effective Legal Protection’ (2014) 51 Common Market Law Review 1437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagińska, E (ed), Damages for Violations of Human Rights: A Comparative Study of Domestic Legal Systems (Springer 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnard, C and Peers, S, European Law (Oxford University Press 2014).Google Scholar
Basedow, J, ‘EU Law in International Arbitration: Referrals to the European Court of Justice’ (2015) 32(4) Journal of International Arbitration 367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baude, W, ‘Adjudication Outside Article III’ (2020) 133 Harvard Law Review 1511.Google Scholar
Beijer, M, The Limits of Fundamental Rights Protection by the EU. The Scope for the Development of Positive Obligations (Intersentia 2017).Google Scholar
Beijer, M, ‘Procedural Fundamental Rights Review by the Court of Justice of the European Union’ in Gerards, Janneke and Brems, Eva (eds), Procedural Review in European Fundamental Rights Cases (Cambridge University Press 2017).Google Scholar
Bell, E, ‘An Introduction to Judicial Fact-Finding’ (2013) 39 Commonwealth Law Bulletin 519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, J and Lichère, F, Contemporary French Administrative Law (Cambridge University Press 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentham, J, A Treatise on Judicial Evidence (Baldwin 1825).Google Scholar
Bermann, G, ‘Reconciling European Union law demands with the demands of International Arbitration’ (2011) 34(1) Fordham International Law Journal 1193.Google Scholar
Bernard, E, La spécificité du standard juridique en droit communautaire (Bruylant 2010).Google Scholar
Bertea, S, ‘Looking for Coherence within the European Community’ (2005) 11 European Law Journal 154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertuzzi, L, ‘AI Act: EU Parliament’s Crunch Time on High-Risk Categorisation, Prohibited Practices’ (www.euractiv.com, 7 February 2023) <www.euractiv.com/section/artificial-intelligence/news/ai-act-eu-parliaments-crunch-time-on-high-risk-categorisation-prohibited-practices/>..>Google Scholar
Beslay, L and Galbally, J, ‘Fingerprint Identification Technology for Its Implementation in the Schengen Information System II (SIS-II)’ [2015] JRC Science for Policy Report EUR 27473, <https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC97779> 100.+100.>Google Scholar
Besselink, L, ‘The Protection of Fundamental Rights Post-Lisbon. The Interaction between the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and National Constitutions’ (FIDE General Report 2013).Google Scholar
Beukers, T, de Witte, B, and Kilpatrick, C (eds), Constitutional Change through Euro-Crisis Law (Cambridge University Press 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilchitz, D, Poverty and Fundamental Rights: The Justification and Enforcement of Socio-economic Rights (Oxford University Press 2007).Google Scholar
Black, J, ‘Constitutionalising Self-Regulation’ (1996) 59(1) Modern Law Review 1468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, H J and Mangiameli, S, Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union – A Commentary (Springer Commentaries on International and European Law 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blomgren Amsler, L, Martinez, J, and Smith, S E, Dispute System Design (Stanford University Press 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bobek, M, ‘What Are Grand Chambers For?’ (2021) 23 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogucki, A and Others, ‘The AI Act and Emerging EU Digital Acquis: Overlaps, Gaps and Inconsistencies’, CEPS In-Depth Analysis, 2022 <www.ceps.eu/ceps-publications/the-ai-act-and-emerging-eu-digital-acquis/>..>Google Scholar
Bos, K van den, Wilke, H A M, and Lind, E A, ‘When Do We Need Procedural Fairness? The Role of Trust in Authority’ (1998) 75(6) Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1449.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P, Outline of a Theory of Practice (Cambridge University Press 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bovend’Eerdt, K, ‘The Protection of Fundamental Rights in OLAF Composite Enforcement Procedures (and the EPPO’s Ship Smoke on the Horizon)’ (PhD thesis, Utrecht University 2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradley, K, ‘Activities of the European Community in the Field of Private International Law in 2007’ (2007) Yearbook of Private International Law 399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breitler, C, ‘Jurisdiction in CFSP Matters – Conquering the Gallic Village One Case at a Time?’ (European Law Blog, 13 October 2022) <ELB-Blogpost-Christian-Breitler-October-202239-final.pdf (europeanlawblog.eu)>.CrossRef.>Google Scholar
Brekke, SA and Others, ‘The CJEU Database Platform: Decisions and Decisions-Makers’ (2023) Journal of Law and Courts 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brekoulakis, S and Dimitropoulos, G, International Commercial Courts: The Future of Transnational Adjudication (Cambridge University Press 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brescia Morra, C, Smits, R, and Magliari, A, ‘The Administrative Board of Review of the European Central Bank: Experience after 2 Years’ (2017) 18 European Business Organization Law Review 567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, M, ‘Civil Courts Structure Review’ (Judiciary of England and Wales, July 2016) <www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/civil-courts-structure-review-final-report-jul-16-final-1.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Briggs, M, ‘The Civil Online Court in England’ in Assy, Rabeea and Higgins, Andrew (eds), Principles, Procedure, and Justice: Essays in honour of Adrian Zuckerman (Oxford University Press 2020).Google Scholar
Brito Bastos, F, ‘The Borelli Doctrine revisited: three issues of coherence in a landmark ruling for EU administrative justice’ (2015) 8 Review of European Administrative Law 269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brito Bastos, F, ‘Beyond executive federalism: the judicial crafting of the law of composite administrative decision-making’ (PhD thesis, European University Institute 2018).Google Scholar
Brito Bastos, F, ‘Derivative Illegality in the European Composite Administrative Procedures’ (2018) 55 Common Market Law Review 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brito Bastos, F, ‘An Administrative Crack in the EU’s Rule of Law: Composite Decision-making and Nonjusticiable National Law’ (2020) 16 European Constitutional Law Review 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brito Bastos, F ‘Judicial Annulment of National Preparatory Acts and the Effects on Final Union Administrative Decisions: Comments on the Judgment of 29 January 2020, Case C-785/18 Jeanningros, EU:C:2020:46’ (2021) 14(2) Review of European Administrative Law 109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broberg, M, ‘Preliminary References as a Means for Enforcing EU Law’ in Jakab, Andras and Kochenov, Dimitry (eds), The Enforcement of EU Law and Values: Ensuring Member States’ Compliance (Oxford University Press 2017).Google Scholar
Broberg, M and Fenger, N, Preliminary References to the European Court of Justice (2nd edn, Oxford University Press 2014).Google Scholar
Broberg, M and Fenger, N, The Procedure before the Court of Justice (Oxford University Press 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brockner, J and Others, ‘Culture and Procedural Fairness: When the Effects of What You Do Depend on How You Do It’ (2000) 45(1) Administrative Science Quarterly 138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouwer, E, ‘Legality and Data Protection Law: The Forgotten Purpose of Purpose Limitation’ in Besselink, Leonard F M, Pennings, F, and Prechal, Sacha (eds), The eclipse of the legality principle in the European Union (Kluwer Law International 2011).Google Scholar
Burson, B, ‘Refugee Status Determination’ in Costello, Cathryn, Foster, Michelle, and McAdam, Jane (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Refugee Law (Oxford University Press 2021).Google Scholar
Bussani, M and Infantino, M, ‘The Many Cultures of Tort Liability’ in Bussani, Mauro and Sebok, Anthony J (eds), Comparative Tort Law: Global Perspectives (Edward Elgar 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, G, ‘A question of jurisdiction: Art. 267 TFEU preliminary references of a CFSP nature’ (2017) 2 European Papers 201.Google Scholar
Cafaggi, F, ‘Private Regulation in European Private Law’ EUI RSCAS Working Paper 2009/31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callewaert, J, The accession of the European Union to the European Convention on Human Rights (Council of Europe 2014).Google Scholar
Callewaert, J, ‘Do we still need Article 6(2) TEU? Considerations on the absence of EU accession to the ECHR and its consequences’ (2018) 55 Common Market Law Review 1685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callewaert, J, ‘No more common understanding of fundamental rights’ (2022) 22 La revue des jurists de Sciences Po 25.Google Scholar
Cane, P, Administrative Tribunals and Adjudication (Hart 2010).Google Scholar
Cane, P, Controlling Administrative Power: An Historical Comparison (Cambridge University Press 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canor, I, ‘Primus inter pares. Who is the ultimate guardian of fundamental rights in Europe?’ (2000) 25 European Law Review 3.Google Scholar
Cappelletti, M, The Judicial Process in Comparative Perspective (Clarendon Press 1989).Google Scholar
Cappelletti, M and Garth, B, Access to Justice: Vol. I A World Survey (Book I, Sijthoff; Giuffrè 1978).Google Scholar
Cappelletti, M and Garth, B, ‘Access to Justice: The Newest Wave in the Worldwide Movement to Make Rights Effective’ (1978) 27 Buffalo Law Review 181.Google Scholar
Carrera, S and Mitsilegas, V, ‘Constitutionalising the Security Union’ in Carrera, Sergio and Mitsilegas, Valsamis (eds), Constitutionalising the Security Union: Effectiveness, rule of law and rights in countering terrorism and crime (Centre for European Policy Studies 2017).Google Scholar
Carrera, S, Somer, M de and Petkova, B, ‘The Court of Justice of the European Union as a Fundamental Rights Tribunal: Challenges for the effective Delivery of Fundamental Rights in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice’ (2012) Centre for European Policy Studies paper 49.Google Scholar
Carrera, S and Stefan, M, ‘Complaint Mechanisms in Border Management and Expulsion Operations in Europe: Effective Remedies For Victims of Human Rights Violations?’ (Centre for European Policy Studies, 26 March 2018) <www.ceps.eu/ceps-publications/complaint-mechanisms-border-management-and-expulsion-operations-europe-effective/>..>Google Scholar
Catanzariti, M and Türk, A, ‘EU agencies and the rise of a mixed administration in the EU multi-jurisdictional setting: facing the challenges of the rule of law’ in Scholten, Miroslava and Brenninkmeijer, Alex (eds), Controlling EU Agencies. The Rule of Law in a Multi-Jurisdictional Legal Order (Edward Elgar 2020).Google Scholar
Chalmers, D and Chaves, M, ‘The Reference Points of EU Judicial Politics’ (2012) 19 Journal of European Public Policy 25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamon, M, EU Agencies – Legal and Political Limits to the Transformation of the EU Administration (Oxford University Press 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamon, M, ‘The joint board of appeal as an accountability mechanism for the ESAs’ in Bergström, Carl Fredrik and Strand, Magnus (eds), Legal Accountability in EU Markets for Financial Instruments: The Dual Role of Investment Firms (Edward Elgar 2021).Google Scholar
Chamon, M, Volpato, A, and Eliantonio, M (eds), Boards of Appeal of EU Agencies: Towards Judicialization of Administrative Review? (Oxford University Press 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chayes, A, ‘The Role of the Judge in Public Law Litigation’ (1976) 89 Harvard Law Review 1281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chevalier, E, ‘Administrative Cooperation in the field of Risk Regulation’, in Chevalier, E, Eliantonio, M, and Lanceiro, R (eds), Administrative Cooperation in the European Union (Bruylant, forthcoming 2024).Google Scholar
Chevalier, E, Eliantonio, M, and Lanceiro, R, Administrative Cooperation in the European Space (Bruylant, forthcoming 2024).Google Scholar
Chirulli, P and De Lucia, L, ‘Specialised adjudication in EU administrative law: the Boards of Appeal of EU agencies 39’ (2015) 40 European Law Review 832.Google Scholar
Chirulli, P and De Lucia, L, Non-Judicial Remedies and EU Administration: Protection of Rights versus Preservation of Autonomy (Routledge 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiti, M, ‘Forms of European administrative action’ (2004) 68 Law & Contemporary Problems 37.Google Scholar
Chiti, E, ‘The Agencification Process and the Evolution of the EU Administrative System’ in Craig, Paul and de Búrca, Gràinne (eds), The Evolution of EU Law (Oxford University Press 2021).Google Scholar
Cisotta, R and Gallo, D, ‘The Portuguese Constitutional Court Case Law on Austerity Measures: A Reappraisal’ in Kilpatrick, Claire and de Witte, Bruno (eds), Social Rights in Times of Crisis in the Eurozone: The Role of Fundamental Rights’ Challenges (EUI Working papers LAW 05/2014)Google Scholar
Coglianese, C, ‘Litigating within Relationships: Disputes and Disturbance in the Regulatory Process’ (1996) 30 Law & Society Review 738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, A and Vauchez, A, ‘The Social Construction of Law: The European Court of Justice and Its Legal Revolution Revisited’ (2011) 7 Annual Review of Law and Social Science 417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conant, L and Others, ‘Mobilizing European Law’ (2018) 25 Journal of European Public Policy 1376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constantinesco, L J, L’applicabilité directe dans le droit de la CEE (Bruylant 2006).Google Scholar
Craig, P, ‘EU accession to the ECHR: Competence, procedure and substance’ (2013) 36 Fordham International Law Journal 1114.Google Scholar
Craig, P and Búrca, G de, EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials (7th edn, Oxford University Press 2020).Google Scholar
Craig, P, ‘Article 41: The Right to Good Administration’ in Peers, Steve and Others (eds), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (2nd edn, Hart 2021).Google Scholar
Cruz Villalón, P, ‘Rights in Europe: The crowded house’ (2012) King’s College London Working Paper 01/2012.Google Scholar
Cseres, K and Outhuijse, A, ‘Parallel enforcement and accountability: EU competition law’ in Scholten, Miroslava and Luchtman, Michiel (eds), Law Enforcement by EU Authorities (Edward Elgar 2017).Google Scholar
Csernatoni, R, ‘Constructing the EU’s High-Tech Borders: FRONTEX and Dual-Use Drones for Border Management’ (2018) 27 European Security 175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtin, D, Executive Power of the European Union: Law, Practices, and the Living Constitution (Oxford University Press 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtin, D, ‘From a Europe of Bits and Pieces to a Union of Variegated Differentiation’ in Craig, P P and De Búrca, G (eds), The Evolution of EU Law (Oxford University Press 2021).Google Scholar
Curtin, DM and Brito, Bastos F, ‘Interoperable Information Sharing and the Five Novel Frontiers of EU Governance: A Special Issue’ (2020) 26 European Public Law 59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtin, D and Senden, L, ‘Public Accountability of Transnational Private Regulation: Chimera or Reality?’ (2011) 38 Journal of Law and Society 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahlan, M, Lastra, R, and Rochette, G, Research Handbook on EU Energy Law and Policy (1st edn, Edward Elgar 2022).Google Scholar
Dam, C van, European Tort Law (Oxford University Press 2013).Google Scholar
Dannemann, G, ‘Constitutional Complaints: The European Perspective’ (1994) 43 The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, B, Resisting the European Court of Justice: West Germany’s Confrontation with European Law, 1949–1979 (Cambridge University Press 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, B, ‘Internationale Handelsgesellschaft and the Miscalculation at the Inception of the ECJ’s Human Rights Jurisprudence’ in Davies, Bill and Nicola, Fernanda (eds), EU Law Stories: Contextual and Critical Histories of European Jurisprudence (Cambridge University Press 2017).Google Scholar
Davis, D M, ‘Socio-Economic Rights’ in Rosenfeld, Michel and Sajó, András (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Law (Oxford University Press 2012).Google Scholar
Davies, G, ‘Legislative Control of the European Court of Justice’ (2014) 51 Common Market Law Review 1579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, M, Enderlein, H, and Joerges, C (eds), Beyond the Crisis: The Governance of Europe’s Economic, Political and Legal Transformation (Oxford University Press 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, M, Witte, B de, and Muir, E, Judicial activism at the European Court of Justice: causes, responses and solutions (Edward Elgar 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Bellis, M, ‘Multi-level Administration, Inspections and Fundamental Rights: Is Judicial Protection Full and Effective?’ (2021) 22 German Law Journal 416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Bellis, M, I poteri ispettivi dell’amministrazione europea (Giappichelli 2021).Google Scholar
De Coninck, J, ‘Catch-22 in the Law of Responsibility of International Organizations: Systemic Deficiencies in the EU Responsibility Paradigm for Unlawful Human Rights Conduct in Integrated Border Management’ (PhD thesis, Ghent University 2020).Google Scholar
De Coninck, J, ‘Effective Remedies for Human Rights Violations in EU CSDP Military Missions: Smoke and Mirrors in Human Rights Adjudication?’ (2023) 24 German Law Journal 342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Gregorio, G, ‘Democratising online content moderation: A constitutional framework’ (2020) 36 Computer Law & Security Review 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Gregorio, G and Ranchordás, S, ‘Breaking down Information Silos with Big Data: A Legal Analysis of Data Sharing’ in Cannataci, Joe, Falce, Valeria, and Pollicino, Oresto (eds), Legal Challenges of Big Data (Edward Elgar 2020).Google Scholar
De Lucia, L, ‘Autorizzazioni transnazionali e cooperazione amministrativa nell’ordinamento europeo’ (2010) 3 Rivista Italiana di Diritto Pubblico Comunitario 759.Google Scholar
Della Cananea, G, ‘The European Union’s Mixed Administrative Proceedings’ (2005) 68 Law and Contemporary Problems 197.Google Scholar
Demková, S, ‘The Decisional Value of Information in European Semi-Automated Decision-Making’ (2021) 14 Review of European Administrative Law 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demková, S, ‘Enforcing Remedies: The Challenges of Automatisation for Effective Oversight’ in Ligeti, Katalin and Brodersen, Kei Hannah (eds), Studies on enforcement in multi-regulatory systems (Nomos 2022).Google Scholar
Demková, S, Automated Decision-Making and Effective Remedies: The New Dynamics in the Protection of EU Fundamental Rights in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (Edward Elgar 2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demková, S and Hofmann, H C H, ‘General Principles of Procedural Justice’ in Ziegler, Katja, Neuvonen, Päivi, and Moreno-Lax, Violeta (eds), Research Handbook on General Principles of EU Law: Constructing Legal Orders in Europe (Edward Elgar 2022).Google Scholar
Dermine, P and Eliantonio, M, ‘Case Note: CJEU (Grand Chamber), Judgment of 19 December 2018, C-219/17, Silvio Berlusconi and Finanziaria d’investimento Fininvest SpA (Fininvest) v Banca d’Italia and Istituto per la Vigilanza Sulle Assicurazioni (IVASS)’ (2019) 12 Review of European Administrative Law 237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimitrova, D, ‘Data Protection within Police and Judicial Cooperation’ in Hofmann, Herwig C H, Rowe, Gerard C and Türk, Alexander H (eds), Specialized Administrative Law of the European Union: A Sectoral Review (Oxford University Press 2018).Google Scholar
Douglas-Scott, S, ‘The European Union and human rights after the Treaty of Lisbon’ (2011) 11 Human Rights Law Review 645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas-Scott, S, ‘The European Union and Fundamental Rights’ in Schütze, Robert and Tridimas, Takis (eds), Oxford Principles Of European Union Law: The European Union Legal Order: Volume I (Oxford University Press 2018).Google Scholar
Duffy, H, Strategic Human Rights Litigation (Hart 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duin, A van, Effective Judicial Protection in Consumer Litigation (Intersentia 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckes, C, ‘EU Accession to the ECHR: Between Autonomy and Adaptation’ (2013) 76 The Modern Law Review 254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, L, ‘Expert Opinion: Regulating AI in Europe: Four Problems and Four Solutions’ (Ada Lovelace Institute, 31 March 2022) <www.adalovelaceinstitute.org/report/regulating-ai-in-europe/>..>Google Scholar
Eliantonio, M, ‘Judicial Review in an Integrated Administration: The Case of “Composite Procedures”’ (2014) 7 Review of European Administrative Law 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eliantonio, M, ‘Information Exchange in European Administrative Law: A Threat to Effective Judicial Protection?’ (2016) 23 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eliantonio, M, ‘Judicial Review of Soft Law before the European and the National Courts a Wind of Change Blowing from the Member States?’ in Eliantonio, Mariolina, Korkea-aho, Emilia, and Ştefan, Oana (eds), EU Soft Law in the Member States Theoretical Findings and Empirical Evidence (Hart 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eliantonio, M ‘Access to Justice in Composite Procedures for the Implementation of EU Law: The Story so Far’ (2023) <https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4373333>..>Google Scholar
Eliantonio, M and Röttger-Wirtz, S, ‘From Integration to Exclusion: EU Composite Administration and Gaps in Judicial Accountability in the Authorisation of Pharmaceuticals’ (2019) 10 European Journal of Risk Regulation 393.Google Scholar
Ellerbrok, T, ‘Das umgekehrte Vorabentscheidungsverfahren als Schlussstein im europäischen Rechtsschutzverbund’ (2022) 113 Verwaltungsarchiv 202.Google Scholar
Epp, C R, The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective (University of Chicago Press 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabbrini, F and Sajó, A, ‘The dangers of constitutional identity’ (2019) 25 European Law Journal 457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fallon, R H, ‘Of Legislative Courts, Administrative Agencies, and Article III’ (1988) 101 Harvard Law Review 915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fartunova, M, La preuve dans le droit de l’Union européenne (Bruylant 2013).Google Scholar
Fasone, C, ‘Constitutional Courts Facing the Euro Crisis. Italy, Portugal and Spain in a Comparative Perspective’ (EUI Working Papers MWP 25/2014).Google Scholar
Fazio, G de, ‘Legal opportunity structure and social movement strategy in Northern Ireland and southern United States’ (2012) 53 International Journal of Comparative Sociology 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feichtner, I, ‘The German Constitutional Court’s PSPP Judgment: Impediment and Impetus for the Democratization of Europe’ (2020) 21 German Law Journal 1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferejohn, J and Pasquino, P, ‘Constitutional Adjudication: Lessons from Europe’ (2004) 82 Texas Law Review 1671.Google Scholar
Ferretti, F, ‘EU Internal Market Law and the Law of International Commercial Arbitration: Have the EU Chickens Come Home to Roost?’ (2020) 20(1) Cambridge Yearbook of European Studies 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fikfak, V, ‘Compliance and Compensation: Money as a Currency of Human Rights’ in Murray, Rachel and Long, Debra (eds), Research Handbook on Implementation of Human Rights in Practice (Edward Elgar 2022).Google Scholar
Fines, F, ‘A General Analytical Perspective on Community Liability’ in Heukels, Ton and McDonnell, Alison (eds), The Action for Damages in Community Law (Kluwer Law International 1997).Google Scholar
Fink, M, Frontex and Human Rights: Responsibility in ‘Multi-Actor Situations’ under the ECHR and EU Public Liability Law (Oxford University Press 2018).Google Scholar
Fink, M, ‘EU liability for contributions to Member States’ breaches of EU law’ (2019) 56(5) Common Market Law Review 1227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fink, M, ‘The Action for Damages as a Fundamental Rights Remedy: Holding Frontex Liable’ (2020) 21 German Law Journal 532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fink, M and Idriz, N, ‘Effective Judicial Protection in the External Dimension of the EU’s Migration and Asylum Policies?’ in Kassoti, Eva and Idriz, Narin (eds), The Informalisation of the EU’s External Action in the Field of Migration and Asylum (Edward Elgar 2022).Google Scholar
Fink, M and Rijpma, J J, ‘The Management of the European Union’s External Borders’ in Tsourdi, Evangelina and De Bruycker, Philippe (eds), Research Handbook on EU Migration and Asylum Law (Edward Elgar 2022).Google Scholar
Fiss, O M, ‘The Bureaucratization of the Judiciary’ (1983) 92 Yale Law Journal 1442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FitzGerald, D, Refuge Beyond Reach: How Rich Democracies Repel Asylum Seekers (Oxford University Press 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fons, M P, ‘The Effectiveness of EU law and Private Arbitration’ (2020) 57(1) Common Market Law Review 1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, J, ‘A power to fine: Establishing negligence and intent in infringements by credit rating agencies and trade repositories’ in Scholten, Miroslava (ed), Research Handbook on the Enforcement of EU Law (Edward Elgar 2023).Google Scholar
Fuster, G G and Others, ‘The Right to Lodge a Data Protection Complaint: OK, but Then What? An Empirical Study of Current Practices under the GDPR’ (Data Protection Law Scholars Network, June 2022) <www.accessnow.org/cms/assets/uploads/2022/06/Complaint-study-Final-version-before-design-June-15.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Galanter, M, ‘Why the “haves” come out ahead: speculations on the limits of legal change’ (1974) 9 Law & Society Review 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galetta, D U, Hofmann, H C H and Schneider, J P, ‘Information Exchange in the European Administrative Union: An Introduction’ (2014) 20 European Public Law 65.Google Scholar
Galli, F, ‘Interoperable Databases: New Cooperation Dynamics in the EU AFSJ?’ (2020) 26 European Public Law 109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gammeltoft-Hansen, T and Hathaway, J C, ‘Non-Refoulement in a World of Cooperative Deterrence’ (2015) 53 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 235.Google Scholar
Garben, S, ‘Sky-High Controversy and High-Flying Claims? The Sturgeon Case Law in Light of Judicial Activism, Euroscepticism and Eurolegalism’ (2013) 50 Common Market Law Review 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García Antón, R, La Cuestión Prejudicial y La Fiscalidad Directa (European University Institute 2015).Google Scholar
García Antón, R, ‘The Reformulation of the Questions Referred to the CJEU for a Preliminary Ruling in Direct Taxation: Towards a Constructive Cooperation Model’ (2015) 24 EC Tax Review 258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geist, M, ‘Fair.com? An Examination of the Allegations of Systemic Unfairness in the ICANN UDRP’ (2002) 27 Brooklyn Journal of International Law 903.Google Scholar
Gentile, G, ‘The ECJ as the EU Court of Appeal’ (2020) 13(1) Review of European Administrative Law 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentile, G, ‘Ensuring effective judicial review of EU soft law via the action for annulment before the EU courts: A plea for a liberal-constitutional approach’ (2020) 16 European Constitutional Law Review, 466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerards, J, General Principles of the European Convention on Human Rights (Cambridge University Press 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerven, W van, Lever, J, and Larouche, P, Cases, Materials and Text on National, Supranational and International Tort Law (Hart 2000).Google Scholar
Gestel, R van and Poorter, J de, In the Court We Trust: Cooperation, Coordination and Collaboration between the ECJ and Supreme Administrative Courts (Cambridge University Press 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gkliati, M, ‘The Application of the EU-Turkey Agreement: A Critical Analysis of the Decisions of the Greek Appeals Committees’ (2017) 10 European Journal of Legal Studies 81.Google Scholar
Glas, L, ‘The age of subsidiarity? The ECtHR’s approach to the admissibility requirement that applicants raise their Convention complaint before domestic courts’ (2023) 41(2) Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goanta, C and Ortolani, P, ‘Unpacking Content Moderation: The Rise of Social Media Platforms as Online Civil Courts’ in Kramer, Xandra, Hoevenaars, Jos, Kas, Betül, and Themeli, Erlis (eds), Frontiers in Civil Justice (Edward Elgar 2022).Google Scholar
Gradoni, L, ‘Constitutional Review via Facebook’s Oversight Board: How platform governance had its Marbury v Madison’ (Verfassungsblog, 10 February 2021) <https://verfassungsblog.de/fob-marbury-v-madison/>..>Google Scholar
Gragl, P, ‘A giant leap for European human rights? The final agreement on the European Union’s accession to the European Convention on Human Rights’ (2014) 51 Common Market Law Review 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grando, M, Evidence, Proof, and Fact-Finding in WTO Dispute Settlement (Oxford University Press 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Granger, M P and Irion, K, ‘The Court of Justice and the Data Retention Directive in Digital Rights Ireland: Telling Off the EU Legislator and Teaching a Lesson in Privacy and Data Protection’ (2014) 6 European Law Review 835.Google Scholar
Graver, H P, ‘The Holship ruling of the ECtHR and the protection of fundamental rights in Europe’ (2022) 23 ERA Forum 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grozdanovski, L, La présomption en droit de l’Union européenne (Anthémis 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gubin, E, Éliane Vogel-Polsky: a woman of conviction (Institute for the Equality of Women and Men 2018).Google Scholar
Guerrero, M, ‘Strategic litigation in EU gender equality law’ (Publications office European Commission, 7 May 2020) <https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2838/458994>..>Google Scholar
Guinier, L, ‘From Racial Liberalism to Racial Literacy: Brown v. Board of Education and the Interest-Divergence Dilemma’ (2004) 91 Journal of American History 92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gundel, J, ‘Rechtsschutz gegen Empfehlungen der EU-Kommission?’ (2018) 53(5) Europarecht 593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutman, K, ‘The Non-contractual Liability of the European Union: Principle, Practice and Promise’ in Giliker, Paula (ed), Research Handbook on EU Tort Law (Edward Elgar 2017).Google Scholar
Gutman, K, ‘The Essence of the Fundamental Right to an Effective Remedy and to a Fair Trial in the Case-Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union: The Best Is Yet to Come’ (2019) 20 German Law Journal 884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagan, M and Others, ‘Design Report: Language Access Innovations in Court: How Can Courts Use Technology & Design to Support People in Court When They’re Not Proficient in English?’ (Legal Design Lab, February 2019) <https://justiceinnovation.law.stanford.edu/courses/language-access/>..>Google Scholar
Halberstam, D and von der Boegart, S, ‘A Fresh Look at Judicial Remedies in EU Equality Law and Beyond: The Untapped Possibility of Structural Injunctions’ [2023] Michigan Law Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series 23/012.Google Scholar
Halmai, G, ‘Abuse of constitutional identity: the Hungarian constitutional court on interpretation of article E) (2) of the fundamental law’ (2018) 43 Review of Central and East European law 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halmai, G, ‘Coping Strategies of the Hungarian Constitutional Court since 2010’ (Verfassungsblog, 27 September 2022) <https://verfassungsblog.de/coping-strategies-of-the-hungarian-constitutional-court-since-2010/>..>Google Scholar
Hamann, H, ‘Der blinde Fleck der deutschen Rechtswissenschaft – Zur digitalen Verfügbarkeit instanzgerichtlicher Rechtsprechung’ (2021) 76 Juristen Zeitung 656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanf, D, ‘EU Liability Actions’ in Schütze, Robert and Tridimas, Takis (eds), Oxford Principles Of European Union Law: The European Union Legal Order: Volume I (Oxford University Press 2018).Google Scholar
Hanf, D, ‘The Trailblazers: The Boards of Appeal of EUIPO and CPVO’ in Chamon, Merijn, Volpato, Annalisa, and Eliantonio, Mariolina (eds), Boards of Appeal of EU Agencies: Towards Judicialization of Administrative Review? (Oxford University Press 2022).Google Scholar
Haraksim, R, Galbally, J, and Beslay, L, ‘Study on Fingermark and Palmmark Identification Technologies for Their Implementation in the Schengen Information System’ (Joint Research Centre EC, 2019) <http://publications.europa.eu/publication/manifestation_identifier/PUB_KJNA29755ENN>..>Google Scholar
Harding, C, ‘The Choice of Court Problem in Cases of Non-Contractual Liability under E.E.C. Law’ (1979) 16 Common Market Law Review 389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harlow, C, State Liability: Tort Law and Beyond (Oxford University Press 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harten, G van, ‘The public-private distinction in the international arbitration of individual claims against the state’ (2007) 56(2) International and comparative corporate law quarterly 371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, D, ‘Process-oriented federalism in the EU: A (partial) response to critiques of process review advocacy in the EU’ (2021) 46(4) European Law Review 460.Google Scholar
Havu, K A, ‘Damages Liability for Non-Material Harm in EU Case Law’ (2019) 44 European Law Review 492.Google Scholar
Heikkila, M, ‘Dutch Scandal Serves as a Warning for Europe over Risks of Using Algorithms’ (Politico, 29 March 2022) <www.politico.eu/article/dutch-scandal-serves-as-a-warning-for-europe-over-risks-of-using-algorithms/>..>Google Scholar
Hermansen, S S L, ‘Building Legitimacy: Strategic Case Allocations in the Court of Justice of the European Union’ (2020) 27 Journal of European Public Policy 1127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertogh, M, ‘A “European” conception of legal consciousness: rediscovering Eugen Ehrlich (2004) 31 Journal of Law and Society 457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hess, B, The Private-Public Divide in International Dispute Resolution (1st edn, Brill Nijhoff 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickman, T R, ‘Tort Law, Public Authorities, and the Human Rights Act 1998’ in Fairgrieve, Duncan, Andenas, Mads, and Bell, John (eds), Tort Liability of Public Authorities in Comparative Perspective (The British Institute of International and Comparative Law 2002).Google Scholar
Hillion, C and Wessel, R, ‘The European Union and International Dispute Settlement: Mapping Principles and Conditions’ in Cremona, Marise, Thies, Anne, and A Wessel, Ramses (eds), The European Union and International Dispute Settlement (Hart 2017).Google Scholar
Hillion, C and Wessel, R, ‘‘The Good, the Bad and the Ugly’: three levels of judicial control over the CFSP’ in Blockmans, Steven and Koutrakos, Panos (eds), Research Handbook on EU Common Foreign and Security Policy (Edward Elgar 2018).Google Scholar
Hilpold, P, ‘So Long Solange? The PSPP Judgment of the German Constitutional Court and the Conflict between the German and the European “Popular Spirit”’ (2021) 23 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilson, C, ‘New Social Movements: the Role of Legal Opportunity’ (2002) 9 Journal of European Public Policy 238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinarejos, A, The Euro Area Crisis in Constitutional Perspective (Oxford University Press 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoevenaars, J, A People’s Court? A bottom-up approach to litigation before the European Court of Justice (Eleven 2018).Google Scholar
Hoevenaars, J and Krommendijk, J, ‘Black Box in Luxembourg the Bewildering Experience of National Judges and Lawyers in the Context of the Preliminary Reference Procedure’ (2021) 46 European Law Review 61.Google Scholar
Hofmann, A and Naurin, D, ‘Explaining interest group litigation in Europe: Evidence from the comparative interest group survey’ (2020) 34 Governance 1235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, H C H, ‘Composite decision-making procedures in EU administrative law’ in Hofmann, Herwig C and Türk, Alexander H (eds), Legal Challenges in EU Administrative Law – Towards an Integrated Administration (Edward Elgar 2009) 136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, H C H, ‘Multi-Jurisdictional Composite Procedures. The Backbone to the EU’s Single Regulatory Space’ (2019) 3 University of Luxembourg Law Working Paper Series 12.Google Scholar
Hofmann, H C H, ‘The Duty of Care in EU Public Law - A Principle between Discretion and Proportionality’ (2020) 13 Review of European Administrative Law 87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, H C H, ‘Article 47: Specific Provisions (Meaning)’ in Peers, Steve and Others (eds), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (2nd edn, Hart 2021).Google Scholar
Hofmann, H C H and Mihaescu-Evans, B C, ‘The Relation between the Charter’s Fundamental Rights and the Unwritten General Principles of EU Law: Good Administration as the Test Case’ (2013) 9 European Constitutional Law Review 73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, H C H, Rowe, G C, and Türk, A H, EU Administrative Law (Oxford University Press 2011).Google Scholar
Hofmann, H C H, Rowe, G C, and Türk, A H (eds), Specialized Administrative Law of the European Union: A Sectoral Review (Oxford University Press 2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, H C H and Tidghi, M, ‘Rights and Remedies in Implementation of EU Policies by Multi-Jurisdictional Networks’ (2014) 20(1) European Public Law 147.Google Scholar
Hofmann, H C H and Ziller, J (eds), Accountability in the EU: the Role of the European Ombudsman (Edward Elgar 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holznagel, D, ‘A Self-Regulatory Race to the Bottom through Out-of-Court Dispute Settlement in the Digital Services Act’ (Verfassungsblog, 16 March 2022) <https://verfassungsblog.de/a-self-regulatory-race-to-the-bottom-through-art-18-digital-services-act/>..>Google Scholar
Iglesias Sánchez, S, ‘The Court and the Charter: The impact of the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty on the ECJ’s approach to fundamental rights’ (2012) 49 Common Market Law Review 1565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inghelram, I, ‘Fundamental Rights, the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) and a European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO): Some Selected Issues’ (2012) 1 Kritische Vierteljahresschrift für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inverardi, P, ‘The Challenge of Human Dignity in the Era of Autonomous Systems’ in Werthner, Hannes and Others (eds), Perspectives on Digital Humanism (Springer 2022).Google Scholar
Isiksel, T, ‘European exceptionalism and the EU’s accession to the ECHR’ (2016) 27 The European Journal of International Law 565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jääskinen, N, ‘Final Thoughts’, in Eliantonio, Mariolina, Korkea-aho, Emilia, Ştefan, Oana (eds), EU Soft Law in the Member States Theoretical Findings and Empirical Evidence (Hart 2021).Google Scholar
Jacobs, F, ‘The Lisbon Treaty and the Court of Justice’ in Biondi, Andrea, Eeckhout, Piet, and Ripley, Stefanie (eds), EU law after Lisbon (Oxford University Press 2012).Google Scholar
Jacqué, J P, ‘The accession of the European Union to the European Convention of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms’ (2011) 48 Common Market Law Review 995.Google Scholar
Jan, B, ‘Safeguarding the Right to an Effective Remedy in Algorithmic Multi-Governance Systems: An Inquiry in Artificial Intelligence-Powered Informational Cooperation in the EU Administrative Space’ (2023) 16 Review of European Administrative Law 9.Google Scholar
Jaraczewski, J, ‘Gazing into the Abyss: The K 3/21 decision of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal’ (Verfassungsblog, 12 October 2021) <https://verfassungsblog.de/gazing-into-the-abyss/>..>Google Scholar
Jeandesboz, J, ‘Ceci n’est Pas Un Contrôle: PNR Data Processing and the Reshaping of Borderless Travel in the Schengen Area’ (2021) 23 European Journal of Migration and Law 431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansen, S Ø, ‘Suing the European Union in the UK: Tomanović et. al. v. The EU et. al.’ (2019) 4 European Papers 345.Google Scholar
Jones, C, Valdivia, A, and Kilpatrick, J, ‘Funds for Fortress Europe: Spending by Frontex and Eu-LISA’ (Statewatch, 28 January 2022) <www.statewatch.org/analyses/2022/funds-for-fortress-europe-spending-by-frontex-and-eu-lisa/>..>Google Scholar
Kanuck, S, ‘Humor, Ethics, and Dignity: Being Human in the Age of Artificial Intelligence’ (2019) 33 Ethics & International Affairs 3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplow, J, ‘Burden of Proof’ (2012) 121 The Yale Law Journal 738.Google Scholar
Karagianni, A, The protection of fundamental rights in composite banking supervision procedures (Europa Law 2022).Google Scholar
Kassoti, E and Idriz, N (eds), The Informalisation of the EU’s External Action in the Field of Migration and Asylum (Springer 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katsh, E, ‘ODR: A Look at History’ in Abdel Wahab, Mohamed S, Katsh, Ethan, and Rainey, Daniel (eds), Online Dispute Resolution: Theory and Practice (1st edn, Eleven 2011).Google Scholar
Katsh, E, and Rifkin, J, Online Dispute Resolution: Resolving Conflicts in Cyberspace (Jossey-Bass 2001).Google Scholar
Katsh, E and Rule, C, ‘What We Know and Need to Know about Online Dispute Resolution’ (2016) 67 South Carolina Law Review 329.Google Scholar
Kelemen, D, Eurolegalism: The Transformation of Law and Regulation in the European Union (Harvard University Press 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kenner, J and Peake, K, ‘Art 33 – Family and Professional Life’, in Peers, Steve, Hervey, Tamara, Kenner, Jeff, and Ward, Angela (eds), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (Hart 2021).Google Scholar
Kenny, D, ‘Proportionality, the burden of proof, and some signs of reconsideration’ (2014) 52 Irish Jurist 141.Google Scholar
Khaitan, T, ‘Guarantor Institutions’ (2021) 16 Asian Journal of Comparative Law 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilpatrick, C, ‘Are the Bailouts Immune to EU Social Challenge Because They Are Not EU Law?’ (2014) 10 European Constitutional Law Review 393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilpatrick, C, ‘Constitutions, Social Rights and Sovereign Debt States in Europe: A Challenging New Area of Constitutional Inquiry’ in de Witte, Bruno, Kilpatrick, Claire, and Beukers, Thomas (eds), Constitutional Change through Euro-Crisis Law (Cambridge University Press 2017).Google Scholar
Kitschelt, H P, ‘Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest: Anti- Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies’ (2009) 16 British Journal of Political Science 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kistemaker, L, ‘Rechtwijzer and Uitelkaar.nl. Dutch Experiences with ODR for Divorce’ (2021) 59 Family Court Review 232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klonick, K, ‘The Facebook Oversight Board: Creating an Independent Institution to Adjudicate Online Free Expression’ (2020) 129 Yale Law Journal 2420.Google Scholar
Kornhauser, L A, ‘Incentives, Compensation, and Irreparable Harm’ in Nollkaemper, André, Jacobs, Dov, and Schechinger, Jessica N M (eds), Distribution of Responsibilities in International Law (Cambridge University Press 2015).Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, M, ‘Performing Legal Expertise: Reflections on the Construction of Transnational Authority’ in Korkea-aho, Emilia and Leino-Sandberg, Päivi (eds), Law, Legal Expertise and EU Policy-Making (Cambridge University Press 2022).Google Scholar
Kozak, M, ‘ECN+ Directive – A missed opportunity for strengthening the rights of parties?’ in Rusu, Catalin S and Others (eds), New Directions of Antitrust Enforcement (Wolf Legal 2020).Google Scholar
Kozak, M and Mainardi, J, ‘Rights of Complainants Before the European Commission – a Critical Analysis’ (2023) 14(3) Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krajewski, M, Relative Authority of Judicial and Extra-Judicial Review: EU Courts, Boards of Appeal, Ombudsman (Hart 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krajewski, M, ‘Judicial and Extra-Judicial Review: The Quest for Epistemic Certainty’ in Chamon, Merijn, Eliantonio, Mariolina, and Volpato, Annalisa (eds), Boards of Appeal of EU Agencies (Oxford University Press 2022).Google Scholar
Krämer, H, Rechtsschutz im EG-Eigenverwaltungsrecht zwischen Einheitlichkeit und sektorieller Ausdifferenzierung: eine Untersuchung unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Gemeinschaftsmarkenrechts (Duncker & Humblot 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krenn, C, ‘Autonomy and effectiveness as common concerns: A path to ECHR accession after Opinion 2/13’ (2015) 16 German Law Journal 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krenn, C, The Procedural and Organisational Law of the European Court of Justice: An Incomplete Transformation (Cambridge University Press 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krenn, C, ‘A Sense of Common Purpose: On the Role of Case Assignment and the Judge-Rapporteur at the European Court of Justice’ in Madsen, Mikael Rask, Nicola, Fernanda, and Vauchez, Antoine (eds), Researching the European Court of Justice: methodological shifts and law’s embeddedness (Cambridge University Press 2022).Google Scholar
Kriesi, H, ‘Political Context and Opportunity’ in Snow, David, Soule, Sarah, and Kriesi, Hanspeter (eds), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements (Blackwell 2004).Google Scholar
Krommendijk, J, ‘Opinion 2/13 as a Game Changer in the Dialogue between the European Courts?’ in Bribosia, Emmanuelle, and Rorive, Isabelle (eds), Human Rights Tectonics. Global Perspectives on Integration and Fragmentation (Intersentia 2018).Google Scholar
Krommendijk, J, ‘Tell me more, tell me more: the obligation for national courts to reason their refusals to refer to the CJEU in Sanofi Pasteur’ (Strasbourg Observers, 20 February 2020) <https://strasbourgobservers.com/2020/02/20/tell-me-more-tell-me-more-the-obligation-for-national-courts-to-reason-their-refusals-to-refer-to-the-cjeu-in-sanofi-pasteur/>..>Google Scholar
Krommendijk, J and Pas, K van der, ‘To intervene or not to intervene: intervention before the court of justice of the european union in environmental and migration law’ (2022) 26 The International Journal of Human Rights 1394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krommendijk, J and Pas, K van der, ‘Third-party interventions before the Court of Justice in migration law cases’ (EU Migration Law Blog, 29 November 2022) <https://eumigrationlawblog.eu/third-party-interventions-before-the-court-of-justice-in-migration-law-cases/>..>Google Scholar
Krommendijk, J and Vries, G de, ‘Do Luxembourg and Strasbourg trust each other? The interaction between the Court of Justice and the European Court of Human Rights in cases concerning mutual trust’ (2021) 4(5) European Journal of Human Rights 319.Google Scholar
Küçüksu, A, ‘Adjudicating Asylum as a Technical Matter at the Court of Justice of the European Union: Neglecting Human Rights When the CEAS Appears to Be in Jeopardy?’ in Kassoti, Eva and Idriz, Narin (eds), The Informalisation of the EU’s External Action in the Field of Migration and Asylum (Springer 2022).Google Scholar
Kuijer, M, ‘The accession of the European Union to the ECHR: A gift for the ECHR’s 60th anniversary or an unwelcome intruder at the party?’ (2011) 3 Amsterdam Law Forum 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuijper, P J, Amtenbrink, F, Curtin, D, Witte, B de, McDonnell, A, and Bogaert, S van den, The Law of the European Union (5th edn, Wouters Kluwer International 2018).Google Scholar
Kwan, A, Yang, S A, and Zhang, A H, ‘Crowd-judging on Two-sided Platforms: An Analysis of In-group Bias’ (Management Science, 9 February 2023) <https://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/full/10.1287/mnsc.2023.4818>..>Google Scholar
Lamandini, M, ‘The ESAs’ Board of Appeal as a Blueprint for the Quasi-Judicial Review of European Financial Supervision’ (2014) 11(6) European Company Law 290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamandini, M and Muñoz, D R, ‘Law and Practice of Financial Appeal Bodies (ESAs’ Board of Appeal, SRB Appeal Panel): A View from the Inside’ (2020) 57 Common Market Law Review 119.Google Scholar
Lanceiro, R and Eliantonio, M, ‘The Genetically Modified Organisms’ Regime: A Playground for Multi-Level Administration and a Nightmare for Effective Judicial Protection?’ (2021) 22 German Law Journal 371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasok, P, Lasok’s European Court Practice and Procedure (3rd edn, Bloomsbury Professional 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lauterpacht, S E and Bethlehem, D, ‘The Scope and Content of the Principle of Non-Refoulement: Opinion’ in Feller, Erika, Türk, Volker, and Nicholson, Frances (eds), Refugee Protection in International Law (Cambridge University Press 2003).Google Scholar
Łazowski, A and Wessel, R, ‘When caveats turn into locks: Opinion 2/13 on accession of the European Union to the ECHR’ (2015) 16 German Law Journal 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leczykiewicz, D, ‘Compensatory Remedies in EU law: The Relationship between EU Law and National Law’ in Giliker, Paula (ed), Research Handbook on EU Tort Law (Edward Elgar 2017).Google Scholar
Lenaerts, K, ‘Some Reflections on the Separation of Powers in the European Community’ (1991) 28 Common Market Law Review 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenaerts, K, ‘The Rule of Law and the Coherence of the Judicial System of the European Union’ (2007) 44 Common Market Law Review 1625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenaerts, K and Others, EU Procedural Law (Oxford University Press 2014).Google Scholar
Leskinen, C, ‘An evaluation of rights of defense during antitrust inspections in the light of the case law of the ECtHR: would accession of the European Union to the ECHR bring about a significant change’ Instituto de Empresa Business School Working Paper 10/04.Google Scholar
Letsas, G, ‘The scope and balancing of rights – Diagnostic or constitutive?’, in Brems, Eva and Gerards, Janneke (eds), Shaping Rights in the ECHR: The Role of the European Court of Human Rights in Determining the Scope of Human Rights (Cambridge University Press 2014).Google Scholar
Levidis, S and Others, ‘Drift-Backs in the Aegean Sea’ (Forensic Architecture, 15 July 2022) <https://forensic-architecture.org/investigation/drift-backs-in-the-aegean-sea>..>Google Scholar
Ligeti, K and Robinson, G, ‘Composite Enforcement and Comprehensive Judicial Protection’ in Luchtman, Michiel, Ligeti, Katalin, and Vervaele, John (eds), EU Enforcement Authorities – Punitive Law Enforcement in a Composite Legal Order (Hart 2023).Google Scholar
Linden, O, ‘The Internal Market’ in Scholten, Miroslava (ed), Research Handbook on the Enforcement of EU Law (Edward Elgar 2023).Google Scholar
Lindseth, P L, Power and Legitimacy: Reconciling Europe and the Nation-State (Oxford University Press 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lisi, G and Eliantonio, M, ‘The Gaps in Judicial Accountability of EASO in the Processing of Asylum Requests in Hotspots’ (2019) 4 European Papers 589.Google Scholar
Lock, T, ‘EU Accession to the ECHR: Implications for Judicial Review in Strasbourg’ (2010) 35 European Law Review 777.Google Scholar
Lock, T, ‘Rights and Principles in the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights’ (2019) 56 Common Market Law Review 1201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López Zurita, L, ‘The Survival of the Fitted? Individual Protection in the European Court of Justice’s Preliminary Ruling Procedure’ (PhD thesis, European University Institute 2021).Google Scholar
López Zurita, L, ‘Responding to What? Reformulated Questions, Useful Answers and Party Observations in the CJEU’s Case Law’ (The Court of Justice as a Relational Actor, University of Gothenburg, September 2022).Google Scholar
Lucía López, Zurita and Stein Arne, Brekke, A Spoonful of Sugar: Deference at the Court of Justice’ (2023) Journal of Common Market Studies, available at https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luchtman, L and Wasmeier, M, ‘The Political and Judicial Accountability of OLAF’ in Scholten, Miroslava and Luchtman, Michiel (eds), Law Enforcement by EU Authorities. Implications for Political and Judicial Accountability (Edward Elgar 2017).Google Scholar
Luchtman, M, ‘Pertinent Issues of Punitive Enforcement in a Composite Legal Order’ in Luchtman, Michiel, Ligeti, Katalin, and Vervaele, John (eds), EU Enforcement Authorities. Punitive Law Enforcement in a Composite Legal Order (Hart 2023).Google Scholar
Luchtman, M, ‘The rise of EU law enforcement authorities’ in Luchtman, Michiel, Ligeti, Katalin, and Vervaele, John (eds), EU Enforcement Authorities. Punitive Law Enforcement in a Composite Legal Order (Hart 2023).Google Scholar
Luchtman, M and Others (eds), Of Swords and Shields: Due Process and Crime Control in Times of Globalization – Liber Amicorum prof. dr. J.A.E. Vervaele (Eleven 2023).Google Scholar
Ludwigs, M, ‘Die Verfahrensautonomie der Mitgliedstaaten’ (2018) 19 Neue Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht 1417.Google Scholar
Lustig, D and Weiler, J H H, ‘Judicial review in the contemporary world – retrospective and prospective’ (2018) 16(2) International Journal of Constitutional Law 316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynskey, O, ‘Deconstructing Data Protection: The “Added Value” of a Right to Data Protection in the EU Legal Order’ (2014) 63 International & Comparative Law Quarterly 569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynskey, O, ‘The role of collective actors in the enforcement of the right to data protection under EU law’ in Muir, Elise and Others (eds), How EU law shapes opportunities for preliminary references on fundamental rights: discriminationa, data protection and asylum (EUI Working Papers 2017/17).Google Scholar
Maas, H, ‘La Commission administrative pour la sécurité sociale des travailleurs migrants’ (1966) 2 Cahiers de droit européen 343.Google Scholar
MacCormick, N, Institutions of Law: An Essay in Legal Theory (Oxford University Press 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machnikowski, P, ‘European Union’ in Oliphant, Ken (ed), The Liability of Public Authorities in Comparative Perspective (Intersentia 2017).Google Scholar
Malgieri, G, ‘Automated Decision-Making and Data Protection in Europe’ in González, Gloria, Van Brakel, Rosamunde, and De Hert, Paul (eds), Research Handbook on Privacy and Data Protection Law (Edward Elgar 2022).Google Scholar
Malleghem, P A van and Baeten, N, ‘Before the laws stands a gatekeeper – Or, what is a ‘regulatory act’ in Article 263(4) TFEU?’ (2014) 51 Common Market Law Review 1187.Google Scholar
Mantelero, A, ‘Fundamental rights impact assessments in the DSA’ (Verfassungsblog, 1 November 2022) <https://verfassungsblog.de/dsa-impact-assessment/>..>Google Scholar
Mare, T de la and Donnelly, C, ‘Preliminary Rulings and EU Legal Integration: Evolution and Stasis’ in Craig, Paul and de Búrca, Grainne (eds), The evolution of EU law (Oxford University Press 2011).Google Scholar
Mańko, R, ‘Action for Damages Against the EU: European Parliament Briefing’ (2018) <www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2018/630333/EPRS_BRI(2018)630333_EN.pdf>..>Google Scholar
Marín Aís, J R, ‘Freedom of Religion in the Workplace v. Freedom to Conduct a Business, the Islamic Veil Before the Court of Justice: Ms. Samira Achbita Case’ (2018) 3 European Papers 409.Google Scholar
Marin, L and Krajčíková, K, ‘Deploying Drones in Policing Southern European Borders: Constraints and Challenges for Data Protection and Human Rights’ in Završnik, Aleš (ed), Drones and Unmanned Aerial Systems: Legal and Social Implications for Security and Surveillance (Springer 2016)Google Scholar
Mashaw, J L, Bureaucratic Justice: Managing Social Security Disability Claims (Yale University Press 1983).Google Scholar
Mazzotti, P and Eliantonio, M, ‘Transnational Judicial Review in Horizontal Composite Procedures: Berlioz, Donnellan, and the Constitutional Law of the Union’ (2020) 5 European Papers 41.Google Scholar
Mazzotti, P and Eliantonio, M, ‘Towards a Theory of Transnational Judicial Review in European Administrative Law’ (2021) 13 Italian Journal of Public Law 350 <ww.ijpl.eu/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/3.Eliantonio_Mazzotti.pdf>.Google Scholar
Mbongo, P and Vauchez, A, Dans La Fabrique Du Droit Européen: Scènes, Acteurs et Publics de La Cour de Justice Des Communautés Européennes (Bruylant 2009).Google Scholar
McHard, A, ‘Reconciling Human Rights and the Public interest’ (1999) 62 Modern Law Review 671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendes, J and Venzke, I (eds), Allocating Authority: Who Should Do What in European and International Law? (Hart 2018).Google Scholar
Merrils, J, International Dispute Settlement (4th edn, Cambridge University Press 2005).Google Scholar
Meyer, F, ‘Protection of fundamental rights in a multi-jurisdictional setting of the EU’ in Scholten, Miroslava and Brenninkmeijer, Alex (eds), Controlling EU Agencies. The Rule of Law in a Multi-Jurisdictional Legal Order (Edward Elgar 2020).Google Scholar
Meyer, J W and Rowan, B, ‘Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony’ (1977) 83 American Journal of Sociology 340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyerson, D, ‘Why Courts Should not Balance Rights against the Public Interest’ (2007) Melbourne University Law Review 873.Google Scholar
Möllers, C, ‘European Governance: Meaning and Value of a Concept’ (2006) 43 Common Market Law Review 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Möllers, C, The Three Branches: A Comparative Model of Separation of Powers (Oxford University Press 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morano-Foadi, S and Andreadakis, S, ‘Reflections on the Architecture of the EU after the Treaty of Lisbon: The European Judicial Approach to Fundamental Rights’ (2011) 17 European Law Journal 595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moreno Lax, V, Accessing Asylum in Europe: Extraterritorial Border Controls and Refugee Rights under EU Law (Oxford University Press 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mot, J de and Faure, M, ‘The Liability of Public Authorities: An Economic Analysis’ in Oliphant, Ken (ed), The Liability of Public Authorities in Comparative Perspective (Intersentia 2017).Google Scholar
Nappert, S, ‘International Arbitration as a Tool of Global Governance: The Use (and Abuse) of Discretion’ in Brousseau, Eric, Glachant, Jean-Michel, and Sgard, Jérôme (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Institutions of International Economic Governance and Market Regulation (Oxford University Press 2019).Google Scholar
Narrillos, E, ‘MEPs to Grill Frontex Director on Agency’s Role in Pushbacks of Asylum-Seekers’ (European Parliament Press Releases, 30 November 2020) <www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20201126IPR92509/meps-to-grill-frontex-director-on-agency-s-role-in-pushbacks-of-asylum-seekers>..>Google Scholar
Nelken, D, ‘Using the Concept of Legal Culture’ (2004) 29 Australian Journal of Legal Philosophy 1.Google Scholar
NeJaime, D, ‘Winning through Losing’ (2011) 96 Iowa Law Review 941.Google Scholar
Neuwahl, N A, ‘The Treaty on European Union: A Step Forward in the Protection of Human Rights?’ in Neuwahl, Nanette A and Rosas, Allan (eds), The European Union and human rights (Martinus Nijhoff 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolosi, S and Omičević, E, ‘The Rise of EU Migration Agencies: Striking a Balance between Enforcement Needs and Access to Justice’ (2022) Jean Monnet Network on EU Law Enforcement Working Paper 16/22, 1.Google Scholar
Nogueira, de Brito M, ‘Putting Social Rights in Brackets? The Portuguese Experience with Welfare Challenges in Times of Crisis’ in Kilpatrick, Claire and de Witte, Bruno (eds), Social Rights in Times of Crisis in the Eurozone: The Role of Fundamental Rights’ Challenges (EUI Working papers LAW 05/2014).Google Scholar
Nolan, A, ‘Welfare Rights in Crisis in the Eurozone: Ireland’ in Kilpatrick, Claire and de Witte, Bruno (eds), Social Rights in Times of Crisis in the Eurozone: The Role of Fundamental Rights’ Challenges (EUI Working papers LAW 05/2014).Google Scholar
Nollkaemper, A and Others, ‘Guiding Principles on Shared Responsibility in International Law’ (2020) 31 European Journal of International Law 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M, Women and human development: The capabilities approach (Cambridge University Press 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussbaum, M, Creating Capabilities. The Human Development Approach (Harvard University Press 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyikos, S, ‘Strategic Interaction among Courts within the Preliminary Reference Process – Stage 1: National Court Preemptive Opinions’ (2006) 45 European Journal of Political Research 527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ojiegbe, C, International Commercial Arbitration in the European Union (1st edn, Edward Elgar 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Leary, S, Employment Law at the European Court of Justice: Judicial Structures, Policies and Processes (Hart 2002).Google Scholar
Oliphant, K, ‘The Liability of Public Authorities in Comparative Perspective’ in Oliphant, Ken (ed), The Liability of Public Authorities in Comparative Perspective (Intersentia 2017).Google Scholar
Oliver, P, ‘Joint Liability of the Community and the Member States’ in Heukels, Ton and McDonnell, Alison (eds), The Action for Damages in Community Law (Kluwer Law International 1997).Google Scholar
O’Meara, N, ‘“A more secure Europe of rights?” The European Court of Human Rights, the Court of Justice of the European Union and EU accession to the ECHR’ (2011) 12 German Law Journal 1813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortolani, P, ‘Self-Enforcing Online Dispute Resolution: Lessons from Bitcoin’ (2016) 36 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortolani, P, ‘If You Build it, They will Come’ (Verfassungsblog, 7 November 2022) <https://verfassungsblog.de/dsa-build-it/>..>Google Scholar
Owusu-Bempah, A, ‘The interpretation and application of the right to effective participation’ (2018) 22 The International Journal of Evidence and Proof 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagano, M, ‘Overcoming Plaumann in EU environmental litigation: an analysis of NGOs legal arguments in actions for annulment’ (2019) Diritto e Processo 311.Google Scholar
Papp, K von, EU Law and International Arbitration: Managing Distrust Through Dialogue (1st edn, Hart 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pas, K van der, ‘Conceptualising Strategic Litigation’ (2021) 11 Oñati Socio-Legal Series 116.Google Scholar
Passalacqua, V, ‘Legal mobilization via preliminary reference: Insights from the case of migrant rights’ (2021) 58 Common Market Law Review 751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwelyn, J and Pelc, K, ‘Who Guards the “Guardians of the System”? The Role of the Secretariat in WTO Dispute Settlement’ (2022) 116 American Journal of International Law 534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavone, T, ‘From Marx to Market: Lawyers, European Law, and the Contentious Transformation of the Port of Genoa’ (2018) 53 Law & Society Review 851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavone, T, The Ghostwriters: Lawyers and the Politics behind the Judicial Construction of Europe (Cambridge University Press 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peers, S, ‘The CJEU and the EU’s accession to the ECHR: A clear and present danger to human rights protection’ (EU Law Analysis, 18 December 2014) <http://eulawanalysis.blogspot.com/2014/12/the-cjeu-and-eus-accession-to-echr.html.>..>Google Scholar
Perea Molleda, R, ‘The Ecn+ Directive and the Next Steps for Independence in Competition Law Enforcement’ (2020) 12 Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pergantis, V and Johansen, S Ø, ‘The EU accession to the ECHR and the responsibility question. Between a rock and a hard place’ in Levrat, Nicolas and Others (eds), The EU and Its Member States’ Joint Participation in International Agreements (Hart 2022).Google Scholar
Pescatore, P, ‘Les Travaux Du “Groupe Juridique” Dans La Négociation Des Traités de Rome’ (1981) 34 Studia Diplomatica 159.Google Scholar
Pescatore, P, Etudes de droit européen 1962–2007 (Bruylant 2008).Google Scholar
Pescatore, P, ‘Van Gend En Loos, 3 February 1963 – A View from Within’ in Maduro, Miguel Poiares and Azoulai, Loïc (eds), The Past and Future of EU Law: The Classics of EU Law Revisited on the 50th Anniversary of the Rome Treaty (Hart 2010).Google Scholar
Pesch, P J, Dimitrova, D, and Boehm, F, ‘Data Protection and Machine-Learning-Supported Decision-Making at the EU Border: ETIAS Profiling Under Scrutiny’ in Gryszczyńska, Agnieszka and Others (eds), Privacy Technologies and Policy (Springer 2022).Google Scholar
Peters, A, ‘The European Ombudsman and the European Constitution’ (2006) 43 Common Market Law Review 697.Google Scholar
Peters, A, Beyond Human Rights: The Legal Status of the Individual in International Law (Cambridge University Press 2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfander, J E, ‘Article I Tribunals, Article III Courts, and the Judicial Power of the United States’ (2004) 118 Harvard Law Review 643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pijnenburg, A and Pas, K van der, ‘Strategic Litigation against European Migration Control Policies: the Legal Battleground of the Central Mediterranean Migration Route’ (2022) 24 European Journal of Migration and Law 401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirrello, A, ‘The European Union Agency for Asylum: legal remedies and national articulations in composite border procedures’ (forthcoming 2024) European Law Journal.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pócza, K, Dobos, G, and Gyulai, A, ‘How to Measure the Strength of Judicial Decisions: A Methodological Framework’ (2017) 18 German Law Journal 1557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polakiewicz, J, ‘EU law and the ECHR: Will EU accession to the European Convention on Human Rights square the circle? The draft accession agreement of 5 April 2013’ [2013] SSRN Electronic Journal.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poli, S, ‘The right to effective judicial protection with respect to acts imposing restrictive measures and its transformative force for the Common Foreign and Security Policy’ (2022) 59(4) Common Market Law Review 1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Półtorak, N, ‘Action for Damages in the Case of Infringement of Fundamental Rights by the European Union’ in Bagińska, Ewa (ed), Damages for Violations of Human Rights: A Comparative Study of Domestic Legal Systems (Springer 2016).Google Scholar
Poulou, A, ‘The Liability of the EU in the ESM framework’ (2017) 24(1) Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulou, A, ‘Financial assistance conditionality and human rights protection: What is the role of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights?’ (2017) 54 Common Market Law Review 991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prechal, S and Widdershoven, R, ‘Redefining the Relationship between Rewe-effectiveness and Effective Judicial Protection’ (2011) 4 Review of European Administrative Law 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prechal, S, ‘Individuals Challenging Directives in EU Courts’ (2022) 59 Common Market Law Review 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prieur, M, Complaints and appeals in the area of environment in the member states of the European Union (Study for the Commission of the European Community, DGXI 1998).Google Scholar
Psychogiopoulou, E, ‘Welfare rights in crisis in Greece: The role of fundamental rights challenges’ in Kilpatrick, Claire and de Witte, Bruno (eds), Social Rights in Times of Crisis in the Eurozone: The Role of Fundamental Rights’ Challenges (EUI Working papers LAW 05/2014).Google Scholar
Quaintance, Z, ‘Michigan Scales Back Massive Applications Process with Human-Centric Design’ (GovernmentTechnology, 31 January 2018), <www.govtech.com/health/michigan-scales-back-massive-applications-process-with-human-centric-design.html>..>Google Scholar
Quinn, P and Malgieri, G, ‘The Difficulty of Defining Sensitive Data – The Concept of Sensitive Data in the EU Data Protection Framework’ (2021) 22 German Law Journal 1583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quintel, T, Data Protection, Migration and Border Control: The GDPR, the Law Enforcement Directive and Beyond (Bloomsbury 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rademacher, T, ‘Factual Administrative Conduct and Judicial Review in EU Law’ (2017) 29(2) European Review of Public Law 399.Google Scholar
Ramsden, M and Gledhill, K, ‘Defining Strategic Litigation’ (2019) 4 Civil Justice Quarterly 407.Google Scholar
Ranchordas, S, Experimental lawmaking in the EU: Regulatory Sandboxes (Social Science Research Network, 22 October 2021) SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3963810 2 <https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3963810>.CrossRef.>Google Scholar
Rangel de Mesquita, MJ, ‘Judicial review of Common Foreign and Security Policy by the ECtHR and the (re)negotiation on the accession of the EU to the ECHR’ (2021) 28 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmussen, H, ‘Why Is Article 173 Interpreted against Private Plaintiffs?’ (1980) 5 European Law Review 112.Google Scholar
Rasnača, Z, Constitutional Change through Eurocrisis Law: Latvia (European University Institute 2014).Google Scholar
Rauchegger, C, ‘Article 47: Damages for Breach of the Charter as a Remedy under the First Paragraph of Article 47’ in Peers, Steve and Others (eds), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (2nd edn, Hart 2021).Google Scholar
Raz, J, The morality of freedom (Claredon Press 1986).Google Scholar
Redondon, MC, ‘Legal Reasons: between Universalism and Particularism’ (2005) 2(1) Journal of Moral Philosophy 47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reich, N, ‘More Clarity after “Claro”? Arbitration Clauses in Consumer Contracts as an ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) Mechanism for Effective and Speedy Conflict Resolution, or as “Deni de Justice”?’ (2007) 3(1) European Review of Contract Law 41.Google Scholar
Reich, N, ‘Party Autonomy and Consumer Arbitration in Conflict: A “Trojan Horse” in the Access to Justice in the E.U. ADR-Directive 2013/11?’ (2015) Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs 258.Google Scholar
Renzenbrink, U F, Gemeinschaftshaftung und Mitgliedstaatliche Rechtsbehelfe: Vorrang, Subsidiarität oder Gleichstufigkeit? (Peter Lang 2000).Google Scholar
Repasi, R, ‘Judicial protection against austerity measures in the euro area: Ledra and Mallis’ (2017) 54(4) Common Market Law Review 1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Resnik, J, ‘Managerial Judges’ (1982) 96 Harvard Law Review 374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rijsbergen, M van and Scholten, M, ‘ESMA Inspecting: The Implications for Judicial Control under Shared Enforcement’ (2016) 7 European Journal of Risk Regulation 569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritleng, D, ‘Boards of Appeal of EU Agencies and Article 47 of the Charter: Uneasy Bedfellows?’ in Chamon, Merijn, Volpato, Annalisa, and Eliantonio, Mariolina (eds), Boards of Appeal of EU Agencies: Towards Judicialization of Administrative Review? (Oxford University Press 2022).Google Scholar
Röben, V, ‘The Enforcement Authority of International Institutions’ (2008) 9 German Law Journal 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rocca, P and Eliantonio, M, ‘European Union soft law by agencies: An analysis of the legitimacy of their procedural frameworks’ in de Bellis, Maurizia, della Cananea, Giacinto, and Conticelli, Martina (eds), EU executive governance: Agencies and procedures (Giappichelli 2020).Google Scholar
Rooi, B van and Fine, A, The Behavioral Code. The Hidden Ways That the Law Makes Us Better … or Worse (Beacon Press 2021).Google Scholar
Rosas, A, ‘The EU and International Dispute Settlement’ (2017) 1(1) Europe and the World Law Review 1.Google Scholar
Rudolph, S, ‘Blackstone’s Vision of Alternative Dispute Resolution’ (1992) 22(2) Memphis University Law Review 279.Google Scholar
Ruffert, M, Law of Administrative Organization of the EU: A Comparative Approach (Edward Elgar 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Šadl, U and Others, ‘Law and Orders: The Orders of the European Court of Justice as a Window in the Judicial Process and Institutional Transformations’ (2022) 1 European Law Open 549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Šadl, U, López Zurita, L, and Piccolo, S, ‘Route 66. Mutations of the Internal Market Explored through the Prism of Citation Networks’ (2023) 21 International Journal of Constitutional Law 826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Šadl, U and Wallerman Ghavanini, A, ‘“The Referring Court Asks, in Essence”: Is Reformulation of Preliminary Questions by the Court of Justice a Decision Writing Fixture or a Decision-Making Approach?’ (2019) 25 European Law Journal 416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadurski, W, ‘Solange, Chapter 3’: Constitutional Courts in Central Europe (EUI LAW Working Paper 40/2006).Google Scholar
Santos Vara, J and Matellán, L P, ‘The Informalization of EU Return Policy: A Change of Paradigm in Migration Cooperation with Third Countries?’ in Kassoti, Eva and Idriz, Narin (eds), The Informalisation of the EU’s External Action in the Field of Migration and Asylum (Springer 2022).Google Scholar
Sarmiento, D, ‘Amending the Preliminary Reference Procedure for the Administrative Judge’ (2009) 2 Review of European Administrative Law 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Säuberlich, U, Die Außervertragliche Haftung im Gemeinschaftsrecht: Eine Untersuchung der Mehrpersonenverhältnisse (Springer 2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheingold, SA, The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy, and Political Change (Yale University Press 1974).Google Scholar
Schermers, H and Waelbroeck, D, Judicial Protection in the European Union (Kluwer Law International 2001).Google Scholar
Schmidt-Kessen, M J, Nogueira, R, and Cantero Gamito, M, ‘Success or Failure? – Effectiveness of Consumer ODR Platforms in Brazil and in the EU’ (2020) 43 Journal of Consumer Policy 659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitz, A and Martinez, J, ‘ODR and Innovation in the United States’, in Abdel Wahab, Mohamed S, Katsh, Ethan, and Rainey, Daniel (eds), Online Dispute Resolution: Theory and Practice (2nd edn, Eleven 2021).Google Scholar
Schneider, J P, ‘Basic Structures of Information Management in the European Administrative Union’ (2014) 20(1) European Public Law 89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, J P, ‘Information Exchange and Its Problems’ in Harlow, Carol, Leino, Päivi, and Cananea, Giacinto della (eds), Research Handbook on EU Administrative Law (Edward Elgar 2017).Google Scholar
Scholten, M, ‘Independence vs. Accountability: Proving the negative correlation’ (2013) 21 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholten, M, ‘Mind the Trend! Enforcement of EU Law Has Been Moving to Brussels’ (2017) Journal of European Public Policy 1348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholten, M and Brenninkmeijer, A, Controlling EU Agencies. The Rule of Law in a Multi-jurisdictional Legal Order (Edward Elgar 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholten, M, ‘Shared Tasks, but Separated Controls: Building the System of Control for Shared Administration in an EU Multi-Jurisdictional Setting’ (2019) 10 European Journal of Risk Regulation 538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholten, M and Luchtman, M (eds), Law Enforcement by EU Authorities: Implications for Political and Judicial Accountability (Edward Elgar 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholten, M, Strauss, B, and Brenninkmeijer, A, ‘Controlling EU Agencies: an Introduction’ in Scholten, Miroslava and Brenninkmeijer, Alex (eds), Controlling EU Agencies. The Rule of Law in a Multi-jurisdictional Legal Order (Edward Elgar 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholten, M, ‘Challenges and successes of enforcement of EU law’ in Scholten, Miroslava (ed), Research Handbook on the Enforcement of EU Law (Edward Elgar 2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schramm, M, ‘Emulated Guardians: Practice, Politics, and Performativity of the DSA and the Oversight Board’ (PhD Thesis, HU Berlin, June 2023).Google Scholar
Schuppert, G F, ‘Public Law: Towards a Post-National Model’ in Dyson, Kenneth and Goetz, Klaus (eds), Germany, Europe, and the Politics of Constraint (Oxford University Press 2003).Google Scholar
Senden, L, Soft law in European Community Law (Hart 2004).Google Scholar
Senden, L and Brink, T van den, ‘Checks and Balances of Soft EU Rule-Making’, Study for the European Parliament Directorate General for Internal Policies (2012) PE 462.433.Google Scholar
Setzer, J and Higham, C, ‘Global trends in climate change litigation: 2021 snapshot’ (2021) London: Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment and Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science.Google Scholar
Setzer, J and Vanhala, L C, ‘Climate change litigation: A review of research on courts and litigants in climate governance’ (2019) 10(3) WIREs Climate Change e580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, M M, Courts, a Comparative and Political Analysis (University of Chicago Press 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelton, D, Remedies in International Human Rights Law (3rd edn, Oxford University Press 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shelton, D, ‘Reparations in Human Rights Law’ in Murray, Rachel and Long, Debra (eds), Research Handbook on Implementation of Human Rights in Practice (Edward Elgar 2022).Google Scholar
Shipan, C R and Volden, C, ‘The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion’ (2008) 52 American Journal of Political Science 840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, B A, Dobbin, F, and Garrett, G (eds), The Global Diffusion of Markets and Democracy (Cambridge University Press 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singapore Management University, School of Law, Singapore International Dispute Resolution Academy (SIDRA), SIDRA International Dispute Resolution Survey: 2020 Final Report (Sidra, 2020) <https://sidra.smu.edu.sg/sidra-international-dispute-resolution-survey-final-report-2020>..>Google Scholar
Sheikh, H, Prins, C, and Schrijvers, E, Mission AI: The New System Technology (Springer 2023).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silbey, S S, ‘After legal consciousness’ (2005) 1 Annual Review of Law and Social Science 323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slaughter, A M, Stone Sweet, A, and Weiler, J H H (eds), The European Court and National Courts Doctrine & Jurisprudence: Legal Change in its Social Context (Hart 1998).Google Scholar
Smulders, B, ‘Increasing convergence between the European court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union in their recent case law on judicial independence: The case of irregular judicial appointments’ (2022) 59 Common Market Law Review 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solum, L B, ‘Procedural Justice’ (2004) 67 Southern California Law Review 181.Google Scholar
Stancil, P, ‘Substantive Equality and Procedural Justice’ (2016) 102 Iowa Law Review 1633.Google Scholar
Statewatch, , ‘Frontex and Interoperable Databases: Knowledge as Power?’ (Statewatch 2023) < www.statewatch.org/frontex-and-interoperable-databases-knowledge-as-power/>..>Google Scholar
Stefan, M and Hertog, L den, ‘Frontex: Great Powers but No Appeals’ in Chamon, Merijn, Volpato, Annalisa, and Eliantonio, Mariolina (eds), Boards of Appeal of EU Agencies: Towards Judicialization of Administrative Review? (Oxford University Press 2022).Google Scholar
Stein, E, ‘Lawyers, Judges, and the Making of a Transnational Constitution’ (1981) 75 American Journal of International Law 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streckert, O, Verwaltungsinterner Unionsrechtsschutz – Kohärenter Rechtsschutz durch Einführung eines Widerspruchskammermodells für die Europäische Kommission (Mohr Siebeck 2016).Google Scholar
Stronks, M, Grasping Legal Time: Temporality and European Migration Law (Cambridge University Press 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stubberfield, C, ‘Lifting the Organisational Veil: Positive Obligations of the European Union Following Accession to the European Convention on Human Rights’ (2012) 19 Australian International Law Journal 117.Google Scholar
Sugarman, SD, ‘Tort Damages for Non-Economic Loss: Personal Injury’ in Bussani, Mauro and J Sebok, Anthony (eds), Comparative Tort Law: Global Perspectives (Edward Elgar 2015).Google Scholar
Sunderland, J and Pezzani, L, ‘Airborne Complicity: Frontex Aerial Surveillance Enables Abuse’ (Human Rights Watch, 12 August 2022) <www.hrw.org/node/383557>..>Google Scholar
Syrpis, P, ‘The Relationship between Primary and Secondary Law in the EU’ (2015) 52 Common Market Law Review 461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tas, S, ‘Frontex Actions: Out of Control?’ [2020] TARN Working Paper 03/2020.Google Scholar
Thanou, S, ‘Individual restrictive measures and actions for damages before the General Court of the European Union’ (2020) 20 ERA Forum 599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thierse, S, ‘Mobilisierung des Rechts: Organisierte Interessen und Verfassungsbeschwerden vor dem Bundesverfassungsgericht’ (2020) 61 Politische Vierteljahresschrift 553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tidghi, M and Hofmann, H C H, ‘Rights and Remedies in Implementation of EU Policies by Multi-Jurisdictional Networks’ (2014) 20 European Public Law 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmermans, C, ‘Will the Accession of the EU to the European Convention on Human Rights fundamentally change the relationship between the Luxemburg and the Strasbourg courts?’ [2014] EUI Distinguished Lectures (Speech delivered at the ‘Judicial Cooperation in Private Law’ of 15 and 16 April 2013).Google Scholar
Toth, A G, ‘The Concepts of Damage and Causality as Elements of Non-contractual Liability’ in Heukels, Ton and McDonnell, Alison (eds), The Action for Damages in Community Law (Kluwer Law International 1997).Google Scholar
Tovo, C, ‘The Boards of Appeal of Networked Services Agencies: Specialized Arbitrators of Transnational Regulatory Conflicts?’ in Chamon, Merijn, Volpato, Annalisa, and Eliantonio, Mariolina (eds), Boards of Appeal of EU Agencies – Towards Judicialization of Administrative Review? (Oxford University Press 2022).Google Scholar
Travel Europe, ‘What Is ETIAS’ (Travel-europe.europa.eu) <https://travel-europe.europa.eu/etias/what-etias_en>..>Google Scholar
Tridimas, T and Gentile, G, ‘The Essence of Rights: An Unreliable Boundary?’ (2019) 20 German Law Journal 794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truby, J and Others, ‘A Sandbox Approach to Regulating High-Risk Artificial Intelligence Applications’ (2022) 13 European Journal of Risk Regulation 270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsourdi, EL, ‘Bottom-up Salvation? From Practical Cooperation Towards Joint Implementation Through the European Asylum Support Office’ (2016) 3 European Papers 997.Google Scholar
Türk, A, Judicial review in EU law (Edward Elgar 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tushnet, M V, The New Fourth Branch: Institutions for Protecting Constitutional Democracy (Cambridge University Press 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twining, W, ‘Moving Beyond Law: Interdisciplinarity and the Study of Evidence’ in Dawid, Philip, Twining, William, and Vasilaki, Mimi (eds), Evidence, Inference and Enquiry (Oxford University Press / British Academy 2011).Google Scholar
Undheim, K, Erikson, T, and Timmermans, B, ‘True Uncertainty and Ethical AI: Regulatory Sandboxes as a Policy Tool for Moral Imagination’ (2023) 3(3) AI and Ethics 997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ury, W L, Brett, J M, and Goldberg, S B, Getting Disputes Resolved (Jossey-Bass 1988).Google Scholar
Vandamme, T, ‘‘The two-step can’t be the quick step’: The CJEU reaffirms its case law on the European Arrest Warrant and the rule of law backsliding’, (European Law Blog, 10 February 2021) <https://europeanlawblog.eu/2021/02/10/the-two-step-cant-be-the-quick-step-the-cjeu-reaffirms-its-case-law-on-the-european-arrest-warrant-and-the-rule-of-law-backsliding/>.CrossRef.>Google Scholar
Vandenbruwaene, W, Constitutional Change through Eurocrisis Law: Belgium (European University Institute 2014).Google Scholar
Vanhala, L, Making Rights a Reality (Cambridge University Press 2011).Google Scholar
Vanhala, L, ‘Legal Opportunity Structures and the Paradox of Legal Mobilization by the Environmental Movement in the UK’ (2012) 46 Law & Society Review 523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanhala, L, ‘Legal Mobilization under Neo-corporatist Governance: Environmental NGOs before the Conseil d’État in France, 1975–2010’ (2016) 4 Journal of Law and Courts 103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanhala, L, ‘Is Legal Mobilization for the Birds? Legal Opportunity Structures and Environmental Nongovernmental Organizations in the United Kingdom, France, Finland, and Italy’ (2018) 51 Comparative Political Studies 380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanhala, L, ‘Legal Mobilization’ (Oxford Bibliographies, 23 November 2021) <www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199756223/obo-9780199756223-0031.xml>..>Google Scholar
Varuhas, J N E, Damages and Human Rights (Hart 2016).Google Scholar
Vauchez, A, ‘The Force of a Weak Field: Law and Lawyers in the Government of the European Union (For a Renewed Research Agenda)’ (2008) 2 International Political Sociology 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vauchez, A, Brokering Europe: Euro-Lawyers and the Making of a Transnational Polity (Cambridge University Press 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vauchez, A, ‘The Genie of Independence and the European Bottle: How Independence Became Europe’s Most Contentious Legal and Political Category’ (2022) International Journal of Constitutional Law 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vavoula, N, ‘Artificial Intelligence (AI) at Schengen Borders: Automated Processing, Algorithmic Profiling and Facial Recognition in the Era of Techno-Solutionism’ (2021) 23 European Journal of Migration and Law 457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vavoula, N, ‘Information Sharing in the Dublin System: Remedies for Asylum Seekers In-Between Gaps in Judicial Protection and Interstate Trust’ (2021) 22 German Law Journal 391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vavoula, N, Immigration and Privacy in the Law of the European Union: The Case of Information Systems (Brill Nijhoff 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venzke, I, How Interpretation Makes International Law (Oxford University Press 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venzke, I and Mendes, J, ‘The Idea of Relative Authority in European and International Law’ (2018) 16 International Journal of Constitutional Law 75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vervaele, J (ed), Compliance and Enforcement of European Community Law (Kluwer International 1999).Google Scholar
Vervaele, J, ‘Special procedural measures and the protection of human rights: General Report’ (2009) 80 International Review of Penal Law 75.Google Scholar
Vervaele, J, ‘Surveillance and Criminal Investigation: Blurring of Thresholds and Boundaries in the Criminal Justice System’ in Gutwirth, Serge, Leenes, Ronald, and De Hert, Paul (eds), Reloading Data Protection. Multidisciplinary Insights and Contemporary Challenges (Springer 2014).Google Scholar
Vezzani, S, ‘The International Responsibility of the European Union and of Its Member States for Breaches of Obligations Arising from Investment Agreements:: Lex Specialis or European Exceptionalism?’ in Adenas, Mads and Others (eds), EU External Action in International Economical Law: Recent Trends and Developements (T.M.C. Asser Press/Springer 2020).Google Scholar
Vissink, L, Effective Legal Protection in Banking Supervision (Europa Law Publishing 2021).Google Scholar
Vogiatzis, N, ‘The Independence Of The European Court Of Auditors’ (2019) 56 Common Market Law Review 667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogiatzoglou, P and Valcke, P, ‘Two Decades of Article 8 CFR: A Critical Exploration of the Fundamental Right to Personal Data Protection in EU Law’ in Kosta, Eleni, Leenes, Ronald, and Kamara, Irene (eds), Research Handbook on EU Data Protection (Edward Elgar 2022).Google Scholar
Vossen, K, Rechtsschutz in Der Europäischen Bankenaufsicht (Mohr Siebeck 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, J, ‘The Concept and the Rule of Law’ (2008) 43 Georgia Law Review 1.Google Scholar
Wallace, R M M, ‘The Principle of Non-Refoulement in International Refugee Law’ in Chetail, Vincent and Bauloz, Céline (eds), Research Handbook on International Law and Migration (Edward Elgar 2014).Google Scholar
Wallerman Ghavanini, A, ‘Mostly Harmless: The Referring Court in the Preliminary Reference Procedure’ (2022) 47 European Law Review 310.Google Scholar
Ward, A, ‘Damages under the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights’ (2012) 12 ERA Forum 589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, A, ‘Article 47: Interrelationship with Other Provisions of the Charter’ in Peers, Steve and Others (eds), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (2nd edn, Hart 2021).Google Scholar
Ward, A, ‘Article 47: The Right to an Effective Remedy under the First Paragraph of Article 47 and Challenge to EU Measure’ in Peers, Steve and Others (eds), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: A Commentary (2nd edn, Hart 2021).Google Scholar
Ward, A, ‘Article 51 – Field of Application’ in Peers, Steve and Others (eds), The EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: a commentary (2nd edn, Hart 2021).Google Scholar
Waters, N, Freudenthal, E and Williams, L, ‘Frontex at Fault: European Border Force Complicit in “Illegal” Pushbacks’ (Bellingcat, 23 October 2020) <www.bellingcat.com/news/2020/10/23/frontex-at-fault-european-border-force-complicit-in-illegal-pushbacks/>..>Google Scholar
Weiler, J H H, ‘The Transformation of Europe’ (1991) 100 Yale Law Journal 2403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werkmeister, C, Pötters, S, and Traut, J, ‘Regulatory Acts within Article 263(4) TFEU – A Dissonant Extension of Locus Standi for Private Applicants’ (2010–2011) 13 Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westney, D E, Imitation and Innovation The Transfer of Western Organizational Patterns to Meiji Japan (Harvard University Press 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White & Case and Queen Mary University of London, ‘2018 International Arbitration Survey: The Evolution of International Arbitration’ (White & Case, 2018) <www.whitecase.com/sites/whitecase/files/files/download/publications/qmul-international-arbitration-survey-2018-19.pdf>..>Google Scholar
White, S, ‘Rights of Defence in Administrative Investigations: Access to the File in EC Investigations’ (2009) 1 Review of European Law 57.Google Scholar
Widdershoven, R, ‘National Procedural Autonomy and General EU Law Limits’ (2019) 12 Review of European Administrative Law 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigmore, J H, A Treaties on the Anglo-American System of Evidence in Trials at Common Law (Brown 1923).Google Scholar
Wiik, A, Amicus Curiae before International Courts and Tribunals (Nomos 2018).Google Scholar
Wildemeersch, J, Contentieux de la légalité des actes de l’Union européenne: le mythe du droit à un recours effectif (Bruylant 2019).Google Scholar
Wille, A and Bovens, M, ‘Watching EU Watchdogs Assessing the Accountability Powers of the European Court of Auditors and the European Ombudsman’ (2022) 44 Journal of European Integration 183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wils, W, ‘Concurrent Liability of the Community and a Member State’ (1992) 17 European Law Review 191.Google Scholar
Wind, M, ‘The Nordics, the EU and the Reluctance towards Supranational Judicial Review’ (2010) 48 Journal of Common Market Studies 1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witte, B de, ‘The use of the ECHR and Convention case law by the European Court of Justice’ in Popelier, Patricia, van de Heyning, Catherine, and van Nuffel, Piet (eds), Human rights protection in the European legal order: the interaction between the European and the national courts (Intersentia 2011).Google Scholar
Witte, F de, ‘Here Be Dragons: Legal Geography and EU Law’ (2022) 1 European Law Open 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wollenschläger, F, ‘Informationssysteme als Herausforderung für den Rechtsschutz im Europäischen Verwaltungsverbund: Das EU-Schnellwarnsystem für Lebens- und Futtermittel (RASFF)’ (2019) 52 Die Verwaltung 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolters, P T J, ‘The Control by and Rights of the Data Subject Under the GDPR’ (2018) 22 Journal of Internet Law 7.Google Scholar
Wright, J, ‘The Retreat from Osman: Z v United Kingdom in the European Court of Human Rights and Beyond’ (2002) International & Comparative Law Quarterly 55.Google Scholar
Wróblewski, J, ‘La preuve juridique: axiologie, logique et argumentation’ in Perelman, Chaïm and Foriers, Paul (eds), La preuve en droit: études (Bruylant 1981).Google Scholar
Xanthoulis, N, ‘Administrative Factual Conduct: Legal Effects and Judicial Control in EU Law’ (2019) 12 Review of European Administrative Law 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yannakourou, M, ‘Challenging austerity measures affecting work rights at domestic and international level. The case of Greece’ in Kilpatrick, Claire and de Witte, Bruno (eds), Social Rights in Times of Crisis in the Eurozone: The Role of Fundamental Rights’ Challenges (EUI Working papers LAW 05/2014).Google Scholar
Zamboni, M, ‘Legislative Policy and Effectiveness: A (Small) Contribution from Legal Theory’ (2018) 9 European Journal Of Risk Regulation 416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zarbiyev, F, ‘On the Judge Centredness of the International Legal Self’ (2021) 32 European Journal of International Law 1139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zekos, G, ‘The Historical Appearance of Arbitration as a Dispute Mechanism’ in Zekos, Georgis (ed), International Commercial and Marine arbitration (1st edn, Routledge-Cavendish 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zglinski, J, ‘The Rise of Deference: The Margin of Appreciation and Decentralized Judicial Review in EU Free Movement Law’ (2018) 55 Common Market Law Review 1341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Melanie Fink, Leiden University
  • Book: Redressing Fundamental Rights Violations by the EU
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009373814.024
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Melanie Fink, Leiden University
  • Book: Redressing Fundamental Rights Violations by the EU
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009373814.024
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Melanie Fink, Leiden University
  • Book: Redressing Fundamental Rights Violations by the EU
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009373814.024
Available formats
×