Book contents
- Frontmatter
- PREFACE
- Contents
- CHAPTER I RECENT ADDITIONS TO OUR KNOWLEDGE OF THE PLANETARY SYSTEM
- CHAPTER II RECENT ADDITIONS TO OUR KNOWLEDGE OF COMETS
- SECTION I
- SECTION II
- SECTION III
- SECTION IV
- SECTION V
- SECTION VI
- SECTION VII
- CHAPTER III ADDITIONS TO OUR KNOWLEDGE OF FIXED STARS AND NEBULÆ
- CHAPTER IV PROGRESS OF ASTRONOMY IN THE UNITED STATES
- POSTSCRIPT
- Frontmatter
- PREFACE
- Contents
- CHAPTER I RECENT ADDITIONS TO OUR KNOWLEDGE OF THE PLANETARY SYSTEM
- CHAPTER II RECENT ADDITIONS TO OUR KNOWLEDGE OF COMETS
- SECTION I
- SECTION II
- SECTION III
- SECTION IV
- SECTION V
- SECTION VI
- SECTION VII
- CHAPTER III ADDITIONS TO OUR KNOWLEDGE OF FIXED STARS AND NEBULÆ
- CHAPTER IV PROGRESS OF ASTRONOMY IN THE UNITED STATES
- POSTSCRIPT
Summary
On the 27th of February, 1826, M. Biela, an Austrian officer, discovered a comet; and on computing its elements, it was found that the same body had been observed in 1805 and in 1772. It was soon discovered that the comet made its revolution round the sun in a period of six years and two thirds. It was of course predicted that the comet would return in 1832. Computation also disclosed another fact, which excited no little alarm. It was predicted that on the 29th of October, 1832, the comet would cross the plane of the ecliptic at a distance of less than 20,000 miles from the earth's path. Now the comet's radius, from observations in 1805, had been determined to be greater than 20,000 miles; from which it followed, that a portion of the earth's orbit would be included within the nebulosity of the comet. It was found, however, that the earth would not arrive at this point of its orbit until a full month afterward. There was, therefore, no great danger of collision; nevertheless, no little alarm was experienced by those not much conversant with astronomy. The comet returned at the time predicted, and was observed by Sir John Herschel; but it was extremely faint, and could only be seen in good telescopes.
In 1839, this comet must have returned again to the sun; but its position was most unfavorable for observation, and it is not known to have been observed at all.
In 1846, this comet returned to its perihelion under circumstances more favorable for observation.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Recent Progress of AstronomyEspecially in the United States, pp. 140 - 149Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010First published in: 1856