Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T14:11:12.343Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Anna Grzymala-Busse
Anna Grzymala-Busse
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Rebuilding Leviathan
Party Competition and State Exploitation in Post-Communist Democracies
 , pp. 247 - 268
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ades, Alberto, and Di Tella, Rafael. 1999. “Rents, Competition, and Corruption,” American Economic Review, 89, 4 (September): 982–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ades, Alberto, and Di Tella, Rafael. 1997. “The New Economics of Corruption: A Survey and Some New Results,” Political Studies, 45, 3: 496–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ades, Alberto, and Di Tella, Rafael. 1995. “Competition and Corruption.” Applied Economics Discussion Paper Series No. 169. Oxford University.
Ágh, Attila, ed. 1994. The First Steps. Budapest: Hungarian Center of Democracy Studies.Google Scholar
Ágh, Attila, and Kurtán, Sándor. 1996. “‘Parliaments’ and ‘Organized Interests’ in Civil Society: Local Government Legislation and Elections in Hungary (1990–1995),” in Ágh, Attila, and Ilonszki, Gabriella, eds. Parliaments and Organized Interests: The Second Steps. Budapest: Hungarian Center for Democracy Studies.Google Scholar
Ákos, Róna-Tas. 1997. The Great Surprise of the Small Transformation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Albats, Yevgenia. 2003. The State Within a State: The KGB and Its Hold on Russia. Ph.D. Dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Aldrich, John. 1995. Why Parties? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allina-Pisano, Jessica. 2005. “Informal Politics and Challenges to Democracy: Administrative Resource in Kuchma's Ukraine.” Unpublished Manuscript, Harvard University.
Amsden, Alice, Kochanowicz, Jacek, and Taylor, Lance. 1994. The Market Meets Its Match. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ansell, Christopher, and Burris, Arthur. 1997. “Bosses of the City Unite! Labor Politics and Political Machine Consolidation, 1870–1910,” Studies in American Political Development, 11 (Spring): 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appel, Hilary. 2004. A New Capitalist Order: Privatization and Ideology in Russia and Eastern Europe. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appel, Hilary. 2001. “Corruption and the Collapse of the Czech Transition Miracle,” East European Politics and Societies, 15, 3: 528–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arian, Alan, and Barnes, Samuel. 1974. “The Dominant Party System: A Neglected Model of Democratic Stability,” Journal of Politics, 36, 1: 592–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auers, Daunis. 2002/2003. “Latvia's 2002 Elections: Dawn of a New Era?” East European Constitutional Review, 11/12, 4/1 (Fall/Winter): 106–10.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert. 1970. Conflict of Interest. Chicago: Markham.Google Scholar
Baldersheim, Harald, et al. 1996. “New Institutions of Local Government: A Comparison,” in Baldersheim, Harald, Illner, Michal, Offerdal, Audun, Rose, Lawrence, and Swaniewicz, Paweł, eds. Local Democracy and the Processes of Transformation in East-Central Europe. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, Andrew. 2003. “Comparative Theft: Context and Choice in the Hungarian Czech, and Russian Transformations 1989–2000,” East European Politics and Societies, 17, 3: 533–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, David. 1997. The Political Economy of Dual Transformations. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, David. 1996. “Democracy, Institutional Change, and Stabilization Policy in Hungary,” Europe-Asia Studies, 48, 1: 47–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartolini, Stefano. 1999–2000. “Collusion, Competition, and Democracy,” Journal of Theoretical Politics, 11, 4: 435–70; 12, 1: 33–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartolini, Stefano. 2002. “Electoral and Party Competition: Analytical Dimensions and Empirical Problems,” in Gunther, Richard, Montero, Jose Ramon, and Linz, Juan, eds. Political Parties. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 84–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartolini, Stefano, and Mair, Peter. 1990. Identity, Competition, and Electoral Availability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barzelay, Michael. 1997. “Central Audit Institutions and Performance Auditing,” Governance, 10, 3: 235–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, Robert. 1981. Markets and States in Tropical Africa. Berkeley: UC Press.Google Scholar
Bendor, Jonathan, Glazer, A., Hammond, T. 2001. “Theories of Delegation,” Annual Review of Political Science, 4: 235–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Colin. 1997. “Understanding Ripple Effects: The Cross-National Adoption of Policy Instruments for Bureaucratic Accountability,” Governance, 10, 3: 213–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benoit, Kenneth. 2004. “Models of Electoral System Change,” Electoral Studies, 23: 363–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benoit, Kenneth, and Hayden, Jacqueline. 2004. “Institutional Change and Persistence: The Evolution of Poland's Electoral System, 1989–2001,” Journal of Politics, 66, 2: 396–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bercík, Peter, and Nemec, Juraj. 1999. “The Civil Service System of the Slovak Republic,” in Verheijen, Tony, ed. Civil Service Systems in Central and Eastern Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 184–210.Google Scholar
Bernhard, Michael. 2000. “Institutional Choice After Communism,” East European Politics and Societies, 3: 316–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bielasiak, Jack. 1983. “The Party: Permanent Crisis,” in Brumberg, Abraham, ed. Poland: Genesis of a Revolution. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Birch, Sarah. 2002. Electoral Systems and Political Transformation in Post-Communist Europe. London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Birch, Sarah. 2001. “Electoral Systems and Party System Stability in Post-Communist Europe.” Paper presented at American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, 30 August–2 September 2001, San Francisco.
Birnir, Jóhanna Kristín. 2005. “Public Venture Capital and Party Institutionalization,” Comparative Political Studies, 38, 8 (October): 915–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruszt, Laszlo, and Stark, David. 1991. “Remaking the Political Field in Hungary: From the Politics of Confrontation to the Politics of Competition,” Journal of International Affairs, 45, 1 (Summer): 201–45.Google Scholar
Brym, Robert, and Gimpelson, Vladimir. 2004. “The Size, Composition, and Dynamics of the Russian State Bureaucracy in the 1990s,” Slavic Review, 63, 1: 90–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, James, and Tullock, Gordon. 1963. The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Bugaric, Bojan. 2005. “The Europeanization of National Administrations in Central and Eastern Europe: Creating Formal Structures Without Substance?” Paper prepared for the Apres Enlargement Workshop, EUI, Florence, 29–30 April.
Bukowska, Xymena, and Czesnik, Mikołaj. 2002. “Analiza Treści Programów Wyborczych,” in Markowski, Radoslaw, ed. System Partyjny I Zachowania Wyborcze. Warsaw: ISP PAN.Google Scholar
Bunce, Valerie. 2001. “Democratization and Economic Reform,” Annual Review of Political Science, 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunce, Valerie. 1999. “The Political Economy of Postsocialism,” Slavic Review 58, 4: 756–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvo, Ernesto, and Murillo, Maria Victoria. 2004. “Who Delivers? Partisan Clients in the Argentine Electoral Market,” American Journal of Political Science, 48 (4 October): 742–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, John. 2000. “Parchment, Equilibria, and Institutions,” Comparative Political Studies, 33, 6/7: 735–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, Daniel. 2001. The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy.Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
CBOS. 2000. “Finansowanie partii politycznych.” Komunikat z badań (Fall).
Cekota, Jaromir, Gönenç, Rauf, and Kwang-Yeol Yoo. 2002. “Strengthening the Management of Public Spending in Hungary,” OECD Economics Department Working Paper No. 336 (30 July).
Center for Study of Democracy. 2004. Brief. Bulgaria Sofia (July). Available at http://www.csd.bg, accessed 19 November 2004.
Čigāne, Lolita. 2002. “A Reflection of the Shortcomings in Legislation on Party Financing in the 2001 Finance Declarations.” Soros Foundation Latvia and Transparency International “delna,” Riga Latvia (April). Available at http://www.politika.lv.
Cirtautas, Arista. 1995. “The Post-Leninist State: A Conceptual and Empirical Examination,” Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 28, 4: 379–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colazingari, Silvia, and Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1998. “Corruption in a Paternalistic Democracy: Lessons from Italy for Latin America,” Political Science Quarterly, 113, 3: 447–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, David, and Levitsky, Steven. 1997. “Research Note: Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research,” World Politics, 49, 3: 430–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colomer, Josep. 1995. “Strategies and Outcomes in Eastern Europe,” Journal of Democracy, 6, 2: 74–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comisso, Ellen. 1986. “State Structures, Political Processes, and Collective Choice in CMEA States,” in Comisso, Ellen, and Tyson, Laura D'Andrea, eds. Power, Purpose, and Collective Choice: Economic Strategy in Socialist States. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Coppedge, Michael. 2001. “Political Darwinism in Latin America's Lost Decade,” in Larry, Diamond, and Richard, Gunther, eds. Political Parties and Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, pp. 173–205.Google Scholar
Coppedge, Michael. 1993. “Parties and Society in Mexico and Venezuela: Why Competition Matters,” Comparative Political Studies, 26, 1 (April): 253–74.Google Scholar
Cotta, Maurizio. 1996. “Structuring the New Party Systems after the Dictatorship,” in Pridham, Geoffrey, and Lewis, Paul, eds. Stabilising Fragile Democracies. London: Routledge, pp. 69–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crenson, Matthew, and Ginsberg, Benjamin. 2004. Downsizing Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Crombrugghe, Alain de. 1997. “Wage and Pension Pressure on the Polish Budget.” Report for World Bank Project RPO 678–96, Policy Research Working Paper No. 1793.
Czabański, Krzysztof. 2003. “Rywin TV.” Wprost, 26 October.
Dallek, Robert. 1998. Flawed Giant: Lyndon B. Johnson, 1960–1973. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mesquita, Bruce Bueno. 1974. “Need for Achievement and Competitiveness as Determinants of Political Party Success in Elections and Coalitions,” American Political Science Review, 68, 3: 1207–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Porta, Donatella. 2000. “Political Parties and Corruption: 17 Hypotheses on the Interactions Between Parties and Corruption.” EUI Working Papers RSC 2000/60, European University Institute, Fiesole, San Domenico, Italy.
Della Porta, Donatella, and Meny, Yves, eds. 1997. Democracy and Corruption in Europe. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Della Porta, Donatella, and Vannucci, Alberto Vannucci. 1997. “The ‘Perverse Effects’ of Political Corruption,” Political Studies, 45, 3: 516–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demsetz, Harold. 1982. Economic, Legal, and Political Dimensions of Competition. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Di Palma, Giuseppe. 1990. “Establishing Party Dominance,” in Pempel, T. J., ed. Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Diermeier, Daniel, and Merlo, Antonio. 2000. “Government Turnover in Parliamentary Democracies,” Journal of Economic Theory, 94: 46–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dnitrova, Zoya. 2002. Financing Election Campaigns. Unpublished Manuscript. Ljabljana: Peace Institute.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Duverger, Maurice. 1965. Political Parties. New York: Wiley and Sons, p. 308.Google Scholar
Dyson, Kenneth. 1977. “Party, State, and Bureaucracy in Western Germany.” Sage Professional Papers in Comparative Politics, No. 01-063. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
East European Constitutional Review. 2001. (Winter). Available at http://www.balticsworldwide.com/wkcrier/0301_0322_99.htm, accessed February 9, 2006. RFE/RL OMRI Daily Digest Report, 29 July 1996.
Ekiert, Grzegorz. 2001. The State After State Socialism: Poland in Comparative Perspective. Unpublished Manuscript. Harvard University.Google Scholar
Ekiert, Grzegorz, and Zielonka, Jan. 2003. “Introduction: Academic Boundaries and Path Dependencies Facing the EU's Eastward Enlargement,” East European Politics and Societies, 17, 1 (Winter): 7–23.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon, Offe, Claus, and Preuss, Ulrich K. 1998. Institutional Design in Post-Communist Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enyedi, Zsolt. 2006. “Party Politics in Post-Communist Transition,” in Katz, Richard, and Crotty, William, eds. Handbook of Party Politics. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Enyedi, Zsolt. 2003. “Cleavage Formation in Hungary: The Role of Agency.” Paper presented at the 2003 Joint Sessions of the ECPR Edinburgh.
Enyedi, Zsolt. 1996. “Organizing a Sub-Cultural Party in Eastern Europe,” Party Politics, 2, 3: 377–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, David, and O'Halloryn, Sharyn. 1994. “Administrative Procedures, Information, and Agency Discretion,” American Journal of Political Science, 38/3: 697–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Union Commission. 2000. Regular Report on the Czech Republic's Progress Towards Accession. Brussels: EU.
Evans, Peter, Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, and Skocpol, Theda, eds. 1985. Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eyal, Gil, Szelényi, Ivan, and Townsley, Eleanor. 1998. Making Capitalism Without Capitalists. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Fainsod, Merle. 1963. Bureaucracy and Modernization. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Fainsod, Merle. 1958. Smolensk Under Soviet Rule. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fainsod, Merle. 1953. How Russia Is Ruled. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fearon, James. 1999. “Electoral Accountability and the Control of Politicians: Selecting Good Types Versus Sanctioning Poor Performance,” in Stokes, Susan, Przeworski, Adam, and Manin, Bernard, eds. Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, John. 1999. “Accountability and Authority: Toward a Theory of Political Accountability,” in Stokes, Susan, Przeworski, Adam, and Manin, Bernard, eds. Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 131–53.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, John. 1986. “Incumbent Performance and Electoral Control,” Public Choice, 30: 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fidrmuc, Jan, Fidrmuc, Jarko, and Horvath, Julius. 2002. “Visegrad Economies: Growth Experience and Prospects.” GDN Global Research Project: Determinants of Economic Growth.
Firmin-Sellers, Kathryn. 1995. “The Politics of Property Rights,” American Political Science Review, 89, 4: 867–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, M. Steven. 1998. “The Determinants of Economic Reform in the Postcommunist World,” East European Politics and Societies, 12: 31–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, Freedom. 2002. Nations in Transit, 2001. Washington: Freedom House.Google Scholar
Frič, Pavol. 1999. Korupce na český způsob. Prague: G Plus G.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Carl, and Brzezinski, Zbigniew. 1956. Totalitarian Dictatorship and Autocracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Frydman, Roman, Murphy, Kenneth, and Rapaczynski, Andrzej. 1998. Capitalism with a Comrade's Face. Budapest: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
Frye, Timothy. 2002. “The Perils of Polarization,” World Politics, 54 (April), pp. 308–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frye, Timothy. 1997. “A Politics of Institutional Choice: Post-Communist Presidencies,” Comparative Political Studies, 30: 523–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganev, Venelin. 2005. Preying on the State: State Formation in Post-Communist Bulgaria (1989–1997). Unpublished Manuscript.
Ganev, Venelin. 2000. “Post-Communism as a Historical Episode of State Building, or Explaining the Weakness of the Post-Communist State.” Paper presented at the twelfth International Conference of Europeanists Chicago, March.
Gazsó, Ferenc. 1992. “Cadre Bureaucracy and the Intelligentsia,” Journal of Communist Studies (September): 76–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 1994. The Politician's Dilemma. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Geddes, Barbara, and Neto, Artur Ribeiro. 1992. “Institutional Sources of Corruption in Brazil,” Third World Quarterly, 4: 641–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gimpelson, Vladimir, and Treisman, Daniel. 2002. “Fiscal Games and Public Employment,” World Politics, 54: 145–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetz, Klaus H. 2001. “Making Sense of Post-Communist Central Administration: Modernization Europeanization or Latinization?” Journal of European Public Policy, 8, 6 (December): 1032–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetz, Klaus, and Margetts, Helen. 1999. “The Solitary Center: The Core Executive in Central and Eastern Europe,” Governance, 12, 4 (October): 425–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golden, Miriam, and Chang, Eric. 2001. “Competitive Corruption: Factional Conflict and Political Malfeasance in Postwar Italian Christian Democracy,” World Politics, 53: 588–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, Arthur. 1999. “Africa's Overgrown State Reconsidered,” World Politics, 4: 520–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Government of the Czech Republic. 1998. “Programové prohlašení Vlády České Republiky” [Programmatic declaration of the Government of the Czech Republic] (27 January). Available at http://www.vlada.cz/ASC/urad/historie/vlada98/dokumenty/progrprohl.il2.htm.
Government of the Republic of Slovakia. 2001. “Správa o boji proti korupcii na Slovensku.” [Report of the Slovak government]. October. Available at http://www.government.gov.sk, accessed 23 November 2002.
Grabbe, Heather. 2001. “How Does Europeanization Affect CEE Governance? Conditionality, Diffusion, and Diversity,” Journal of European Public Policy, 8, 6 (December): 1013–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, Kenneth. 2004. Defeating Dominance: Opposition Party Building and Mexico's Democratization in Comparative Perspective. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.
Gros, Daniel, and Suhcrke, Marc. 2000. “Ten Years After: What Is Special About Transition Countries?” EBRD Working Paper No. 56, August.
Grzymała-Busse, Anna. 2004. “Informal Institutions and the Post-Communist State.” Paper prepared for the Conference on the Role of Ideas in Post-Communist Politics: A Re-Evaluation Havighurst Center, Luxembourg, 5–9 July.
Grzymała-Busse, Anna. 2003. “Political Competition and the Politicization of the State,” Comparative Political Studies, 36, 10 (December): 1123–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grzymała-Busse, Anna. 2002. Redeeming the Communist Past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grzymała-Busse, Anna, and Innes, Abby. 2003. “Great Expectations: The EU and Domestic Political Competition in East Central Europe,” East European Politics and Societies, 17, 1: 64–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grzymała-Busse, Anna, and Jones Luong, Pauline. 2002. “Reconceptualizing the Post-Communist State,” Politics and Society, 30, 4 (December): 529–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
György, Istvan. 1999. “The Civil Service System of Hungary,” in Verheijen, Tony, ed. Civil Service Systems in Central and Eastern Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar: 131–58.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1975. Legitimation Crisis. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
Hadenius, Stig. 1985. Swedish Politics During the 20th Century. Boras: Swedish Institute.Google Scholar
Hegedüs, József. 1999. “Hungarian Local Government,” in Emil, Kirchner, ed., Decentralization and Transition in the Visegrad. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Heidenheimer, Arnold J., Johnston, Michael, and Levine, Victor, eds. 1989. Political Corruption. New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
Hellman, Joel. 1998. “Winners Take All: The Politics of Partial Reform,” World Politics, 50, 2 (January): 203–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellman, Joel, and Kaufmann, Daniel. 2001. “Confronting the Challenge of State Capture in Transition Economics,” Finance and Development, 38, 3 (September).Google Scholar
Hellman, Joel, Jones, Geraint, and Kaufmann, Daniel. 2000. “Seize the State, Seize the Day.” World Bank Policy Research Paper No. 2444.
Hendley, Katherine. 1996. Trying to Make Law Matter. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrera, Yoshiko. 2001. “Russian Economic Reform 1991–1998,” in Barany, Zoltan, and Moser, Robert, eds. Challenges to Democratic Transition In Russia. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesse, Joachim Jens. 1993. “From Transformation to Modernization: Administrative Change in Central and Eastern Europe,” in idem. ed. Administrative Transformation in Central and Eastern Europe. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Heywood, Paul. 1997. “Political Corruption: Problems and Perspectives,” Political Studies, 45, 3: 417–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirszowicz, Maria. 1980. The Bureaucratic Leviathan. Oxford: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
Hojnacki, William. 1996. “Politicization as a Civil Service Dilemma,” in Bekke, Hans, Perry, James, and Toonen, Theo, eds. Civil Service Systems in Comparative Perspective. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 137–64.Google Scholar
Holmes, Stephen. 1996. “Cultural Legacies or State Collapse: Probing the Post-Communist Dilemma,” in Mandelbaum, Michael, ed. Postcommunism: Four Perspectives. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.Google Scholar
Holmstrom, Bengt. 1982. “Managerial Incentive Problems: A Dynamic Perspective,” in Essays in Economic and Management in Honor of Lars Wahlbeck. Stockholm: Swedish School of Economics.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Shale, and Petréš, Martin. 2003. “Pride and Prejudice in Prague: Understanding Early Policy Error and Belsteol Reform in Czech Economic Transition,” East European Politics and Societies, 17, 2: 231–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horráth, Tamás, ed. 2000. Decentralization: Experiments and Reforms. Budapest: Open Society Institute.Google Scholar
Hough, Jerry. 1969. The Soviet Prefects. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hough, Jerry, and Fainsod, Merle. 1979. How the Soviet Union Is Governed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Howard, Marc Morjé. 2003. The Weakness of Civil Society in Post-Communist Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, John, and Shipan, Charles. 2002. Deliberate Discretion? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphrey, Caroline. 2002. The Unmaking of Soviet Life. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hutchcroft, Paul. 1998. Booty Capitalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Ichino, Nahomi. 2006. Thugs and Voters: Political Tournaments in Nigeria. Ph.D. Thesis Department of Political Science, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Ikstens, Jānis, Smilov, Daniel, and Walecki, Marcin. 2002. “Campaign Finance in Central and Eastern Europe,” IFES Reports (April). Washington: IFES.Google Scholar
Ilonszki, Gabriella. 2002. “A Functional Clarification of Parliamentary Committees in Hungary, 1990–1998,” in Olson, David, and Crowther, William, eds. Committees in Post-Communist Democratic Parliaments: Comparative Institutionalization. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, pp. 21–43.Google Scholar
Ilonszki, Gabriella. 2000. “The Second Generation Political Elite in Hungary: Partial Consolidation,” in Frentzel-Zagórska, Janina, and Wasilewski, Jacek, eds. The Second Generation of Democratic Elites in East and Central Europe. Warsaw: PAN ISP.Google Scholar
Ilonszki, Gabriella. 1998. “Representation Deficit in a New Democracy: Theoretical Considerations and the Hungarian Case,” Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 14: 157–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
INEKO for the Slovak Government. 2000. “Zaverečná správa o výsledkoch a odporučaniach audity súladu činnosti a financovania úsredných orgánov štátnej správy,” August.
Innes, Abby. 2002. “Party Competition in Post-Communist Europe: The Great Electoral Lottery,” Comparative Politics, 35, 1: 85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Monetary Fund. 1999. Report on Observance of Standards and Codes, August 1999/March 2000.
Ishiyama, John. 1997. “Transitional Electoral Systems in Post-Communist Eastern Europe,” Political Science Quarterly, 112, 1: 95–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Issacharoff, Samuel, and Pildes, Richard. 1998. “Politics as Markets: Partisan Lockups of the Democratic Process,” Stanford Law Review (February): 642–717.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben, and Wren, Anne. 1998. “Equality, Employment, and Budgetary Restraint,” World Politics, 50, 4: 507–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jabłoński, A. 1998. “Europeanization of Public Administration in Central Europe: Poland in Comparative Perspective.” NATO Individual Democratic Institution Research Fellowships, Final Report 1995–7.
Jackman, Robert. 1993. Power Without Force. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, Wade. 2004. The Enlargement of the EU and NATO: Ordering from the Menu in Central Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarosz, Maria. 2001. Manowce Polskiej Prywatyzacji. Warszawa: PWN SA.Google Scholar
Jednotka boji proti korupci, Ministry of Interior. 2001. Zpráva o korupci v ČR a o plnění harmonogramu opatření vládního programu boje proti korupci v ČR.
Johns, Michael. 2003. “Do as I Say and Not as I Do: The European Union, Eastern Europe, and Minority Rights,” East European Politics and Societies, 17, 4 (November): 682–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones Luong, Pauline. 2002. Institutional Change and Political Continuity in Post-Soviet Central Asia: Power, Perceptions, and Pacts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones Luong, Pauline, and Weinthal, Erika. 2004. “Contra Coercion: Russian Tax Reform, Exogenous Shocks and Negotiated Institutional Change,” American Political Science Review, 98, 1: 139–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jungerstam-Mulders, Susanne, ed. 2006. Post-Communist EU Member States: Parties and Party Systems. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Kalniņš, Valts, and Čigāne, Lolita. 2003. “On the Road Toward a More Honest Society.” Policy Report, January. Available at http://www.politika.lv.
Kaminski, Antoni. 1992. An Institutional Theory of Communist Regimes: Design, Function, and Breakdown. San Francisco: ICS Press.Google Scholar
Kang, David. 2002. Crony Capitalism: Corruption and Development in South Korea and the Philippines. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, Karel. 1993. Aparát ÚV KSC v letech 1948–1968. Sesity Ústavu pro Soudobé Dějiny AV ČR Sv. 10.
Kaplan, Karel. 1987. The Short March: The Communist Takeover of Power in Czechoslovakia, 1945–1948. Boulder CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Karasimeonov, Georgii. 1996. “Bulgaria's New Party System,” in Pridham, Geoffrey, and Lewis, Paul, eds. Stabilizing Fragile Democracies. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karklins, Rasma. 2002. Typology of Post-Communist Corruption, Problems of Post-Communism, 49 (July/August): 22–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karl-Heinz, Nassmacher. 1989. “Structure and Impact of Public Subsidies to Political Parties in Europe,” in Alexander, Herbert, ed. Comparative Political Finance in the 1980s, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 236–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Richard, and Mair, Peter. 1995. “Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy,” Party Politics, 1: 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, Daniel. 2003. “Rethinking Governance: Empirical Lessons Challenge Orthodoxy.” World Bank Working Paper.
Kaufman, Daniel, Kraay, A., and Mastruzzi, M. 2005. Governance Matters IV: Governance Indicators 1996–2004. Washington: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keri, Laszlo. 1994. Balance: The Hungarian Government 1990–1994. Budapest: Korridor.Google Scholar
Kettle, Steve. 1995. “Straining at the Seams.” Transition (April). Available at http://www.tol.cz.
King, Roswitha. 2003. “Conversations with Civil Servants: Interview Results from Estonia, Lithuania, Czech Republic and Poland.” Manuscript, University of Latvia Riga.
Kiss, Csilla. 2003. “From Liberalism to Conservatism: The Federation of Young Democrats in Post-Communist Hungary,” East European Politics and Societies, 16, 3, 739–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 2001. “Divergent Paths of Post-Communist Democracies,” in Diamond, Larry, and Gunther, Richard, eds. Political Parties and Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, pp. 299–323.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 2000. “Linkages Between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Polities,” Comparative Political Studies, 33, 6/7: 845–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert, Mansfeldová, Zdenka, Markowski, Radoslaw, and Toka, Gábor. 1999. Post-Communist Party Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert, and Wilkinson, Steven. Forthcoming. “Citizen-Politician Linkages: An Introduction,” in Kitschelt, and Wilkinson, , eds. Patrons, Clients, and Linkages. Manuscript, Duke University.Google Scholar
KNAB. 2003. “Progress and Results in the Field of Corruption Prevention and Combat,” Periodic Update 24 (November). Available at http://www.knab.gov.lv/ru/actual/article.php?id=18863, accessed 12 February 2004.
Knight, Jack. 1992. Institutions and Social Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochanowicz, Jacek. 1994. “Reforming Weak States and Deficient Bureaucracies,” in Nelson, Joan M., Kochanowicz, Jacek, Mizsei, Kalman, and Munoz, Oscar, eds. Intricate Links: Democratization and Market Reforms in Latin America and Eastern Europe. Washington: Overseas Development Council, pp. 194–206.Google Scholar
Koole, Ruud. 1996. “Cadre, Catch-all or Cartel? A Comment,” Party Politics, 4: 507–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopecký, Petr. 2006. “Political Parties and the State in Post-Communist Europe: The Nature of the Symbiosis,” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 22, 3 (September): 251–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopstein, Jeff, and Reilly, David. 2000. “Geographic Diffusion and the Transformation of the Postcommunist World,” World Politics, 53, 1: 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Körösényi, Andras. 1999. Government and Politics in Hungary. Budapest: CEU Press.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen. 1984. “Approaches to the State: Alternative Conceptions and Historical Dynamics,” Comparative Politics, 16, 2 (January): 223–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krašovec, Alenka. 2001. “Party and State in Democratic Slovenia,” in Lewis, Paul G., ed. Party Development and Democratic Change in Post-Communist Europe. London: Frank Cass, pp. 93–106.Google Scholar
Krause, Kevin Deegan. 2006. Elected Affinities. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Krueger, Anne. 1974. “The Political Economy of the Rent-Seeking Society,” American Economic Review, 64, 3: 291–303.Google Scholar
Krupavičius, Algis. 1998. “The Post-Communist Transition and Institutionalization of Lithuania's Parties,” Political Studies, 46, 3: 465–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunicová, Jana, and Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 2005. “Electoral Rules and Constitutional Structures as Constraints on Corruption,” British Journal of Political Science, 35: 573–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurczewski, Jacek. 1999. “The Rule of Law in Poland,” in Přibán, Jiří, and Young, James, eds. The Rule of Law in Central Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Lancaster, Thomas D., and Montinolla, Gabriella. 2001. “Comparative Political Corruption: Issues of Operationalization and Measurement,” Studies in Comparative International Development, 36, 3 (Fall): 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palombara, Joseph. 1994. “Structural and Institutional Aspects of Corruption,” Social Research, 61, 2 (Summer): 325–50.Google Scholar
Laver, Michael, and Shepsle, Kenneth. 1999. “Government Accountability in Parliamentary Democracy,” in Stokes, Susan, Przeworski, Adam, and Manin, Bernard, eds. Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 279–96.Google Scholar
Lawson, Stephanie. 1993. “Conceptual Issues in the Comparative Study of Regime Change and Democratization,” Comparative Politics, 25, 2 (January): 183–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, Margaret. 1997. Consent, Dissent, and Patriotism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, Margaret. 1988. Of Rule and Revenue. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Levite, Ariel, and Tarrow, Sidney. 1983. “The Legitimation of Excluded Parties in Dominant Party Systems,” Comparative Politics, 15, 3 (April): 295–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven. 2003. Transforming Labor-Based Parties in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewanski, Rudolf. 1997. “Italian Civil Service: A Pre-Modern Bureaucracy in Transition?” Paper prepared for the Conference on Civil Service Systems in Comparative Perspective, Indiana University, 5–8 April.
Lewis, Paul, and Gortat, Radzisława. 1995. “Models of Party Development and Questions of State Dependence in Poland,” Party Politics, 4: 599–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Paul G. 2000. Political Parties in Post-Communist Eastern Europe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lieven, Anatol. 1994. The Baltic Revolution. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arendt. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arendt, ed. 1992. Parliamentary Versus Presidential Government. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lindberg, Staffan. 2004. The Power of Elections: Democratic Participation, Competition, and Legitimacy in Africa. Lund: Lund University.Google Scholar
Linek, Lukáš. 2002. “Czech Republic,” European Journal of Political Research, 41: 931–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linek, Lukáš, and Rakušanová, Petra. 2002. “Parties in the Parliament: Why, When, and How Do Parties Act in Unity?” Institute of Sociology, Czech Republic Sociological Paper No. 02:9.
Linz, Juan. 1994. “Introduction: Some Thoughts on Presidentialism in PostCommunist Europe,” in Taras, Ray, ed. Postcommunist Presidents. Cambridge, Oxford University Press: 1–14.Google Scholar
Lippert, Barbara, Umbach, Gaby, and Wessels, Wolfgang. 2001. “Europeanization of CEE Executives: EU Membership Negotiations as a Shaping Power,” Journal of European Public Policy, 8 (6 December): 980–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Logue, John, and Einhorn, Eric. 1988. “Restraining the Governors: The Nordic Experience with Limiting the Strong State,” Scandinavian Political Studies, 11, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Łoś, Maria, and Zybertowicz, Andrzej. 1999. “Is Revolution a Solution?” in Krygier, Martin, and Czarnota, Adam, eds. The Rule of Law After Communism. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Lucking, Richard. 2003. Civil Service Training in the Context of Public Administration Reform. New York: United Nations Development Program.Google Scholar
Lupia, Arthur, and McCubbins, Matthew. 2000. “The Institutional Foundations of Political Competence,” in Lupia, Arthur, McCubbins, Mathew D., and Popkin, Samuel L., eds. Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 47–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupia, Arthur, and McCubbins, Matthew. 2000. Privatizing the Police State. New York, St. Martins.Google Scholar
Luther, Kurt Richard, and Müller, Wolfgang. 1992. Politics in Austria: Still a Case of Consociationalism? London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott. 1993. “Presidentialism, Multipartism, and Democracy: The Difficult Combination,” Comparative Political Studies, 26, 2 (July): 198–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mair, Peter. 1997. Party System Change: Approaches and Interpretations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Mair, Peter. 1995. “Political Parties, Popular Legitimacy, and Public Privilege,” West European Politics, 18, 2 (July): 40–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mair, Peter. 1994. “Party Organizations,” in Katz, Richard, and Mair, Peter, eds. How Parties Organize. New York: Sage, pp. 134–57.Google Scholar
Majone, Giandomenico. 1994. “The Rise of the Regulatory State in Europe,” West European Politics, 12, 3 (July): 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malcická, Lenka. 2001. “Vybrané aspekty financovania politických strán a hnutí v SR” [Selected aspects of party and movement financing in Slovakia]. Manuscript, Bratislava. Available at http://politika.host.sk/prispevky/prispevok_malcicka_financovaniestran.htm, accessed 21 June 2001.
Malová, Darina. 1997. “The Development of Interest Representation in Slovakia After 1989,” in Szomolányi, Soňa, and Gould, John, eds. Slovakia: Problems of Democratic Consolidation. Bratislava: Friedrich Ebert Foundation.Google Scholar
Mann, Michael. 1988. States, War, and Capitalism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
“Marching Backwards: Slovakia's Counterrevolution.” 1995. October. Available at http://project-syndicate.org/surveys/marching_bac.php4, accessed 10 September, 2004.
Mattli, Walter, and Plümper, Thomas. 2002. “The Demand-Side Politics of EU Enlargement: Democracy and the Application for EU Membership,” Journal of European Public Policy, 9, 4: 550–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauro, Paolo. 1998. “Corruption: Causes, Consequences, and Agenda for Further Research,” Finance and Development (March): 11–14.Google Scholar
Mauro, Paolo. 1995. “Corruption and Growth,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 3: 681–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McChesney, Fred. 1987. “Rent Extraction and Rent Creation in the Economic Theory of Regulation,” Journal of Legal Studies, 16: 101–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCubbins, Matthew, Noll, Roger, and Weingast, Barry. 1989. “Structure and Process; Politics and Policy: Administrative Arrangements and the Political Control of Agencies,” Virginia Law Review, 75, 2: 431–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCubbins, Matthew, Noll, Roger, and Weingast, Barry. 1987. “Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control,” Economics and Organization, 77 (March): 243–77.Google Scholar
McFaul, M. 1995. “State Power, Institutional Change, and the Politics of Privatization in Russia,” World Politics, 47, 2: 210–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMann, Kelly. 2003. “The Civic Realm in Kyrgyzstan: Soviet Economic Legacies and Activists' Expectations,” in Jones Luong, Pauline, ed. The Transformation of Central Asia: States and Societies from Soviet Rule to Independence. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp. 213–45.Google Scholar
McMenamin, Iain, and Schoenman, Roger. 2004, “Political Competition: The Rule of Law and Corruption in Successful Post-Communist Countries,” Working Papers in International Studies, 7.Google Scholar
Meltzer, Allan H., and Richard, Scott F. 1981. “Rational Theory of the Size of Government,” Journal of Political Economy, 89, 5: 914–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendilow, Jonathan. 1992. “Public Party Funding and Party Transformation in Multiparty Systems,” Comparative Political Studies, 25, 1 (April): 90–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesežnikov, Grigorij. 2002. “Domestic Politics,” in Mesežnikov, Grigorij, Kollár, Miroslav, and Nicholson, Tom, eds. Slovakia 2001. Bratislava: Institute for Public Affairs, pp. 21–92.Google Scholar
Mesežnikov, Grigorij. 1997. “The Open-Ended Formation of Slovakia's Political Party System,” in Szomolányi, Soňa, and John, Gould, eds. Slovakia: Problems of Democratic Consolidation. Bratislava: Friedrich Ebert Foundation.Google Scholar
Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik. 2006. “The Rise of the Partisan State? Parties, Patronage, and the Ministerial Bureaucracy in Hungary,” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 22, 3 (September): 274–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, William, Grødeland, Ase, and Koshechkina, Tatyana. 2001. A Culture of Corruption? Coping with Government in Post-Communist Europe. Budapest: CEU Press.Google Scholar
Moe, Terry M. 1990. “Political Institutions: The Neglected Side of the Story,” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 7: 213–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moe, Terry M., and Caldwell, Michael, 1994. “The Institutional Foundations of Democratic Government: A Comparison of Presidential and Parliamentary Systems,” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 150/1: 171–95.Google Scholar
Moe, Terry, and Miller, Goney. 1983. “Bureaucrats, Legislators, and the Size of Government,” American Political Science Review, 77: 297–323.Google Scholar
Montinola, Gabriella, and Jackman, Robert. 2002. “Source of Corruption: A Cross-Country Study,” British Journal of Political Science, 32, 1 (January): 147–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew, and Vachudová, Milada Anna. 2003. “National Interests, State Power and EU Enlargement,” East European Politics and Societies, 4, 17, 1 (Winter): 42–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morlino, Leonardo. 2001. “The Three Phases of Italian Parties,” in Diamond, Larry, and Gunter, Richard, eds. Political Parties and Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, pp. 109–42.Google Scholar
Müller-Rommel, Ferdinand, Fettelschoss, Katja, and Harst, Philipp, 2004. “Party Government in Central East European Democracies: A Data Collection (1990–2003),” European Journal of Political Research, 43: 869–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Wolfgang. 2006. “Party Patronage and Party Colonization of the State,” in Richard, Katz, and Crotty, William, eds. Handbook of Party Politic. London: Sage, pp. 189–95.Google Scholar
Müller, Wolfgang. 1992. “Austrian Governmental Institutions: Do They Matter?” in Luther, Kurt Richard, and Müller, Wolfgang, eds. Politics in Austria: Still a Case of Consociationalism? London: Frank Cass, pp. 99–131.Google Scholar
Munck, Gerardo, and Verkuilen, Jay. 2002. “Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: Evaluating Alternative Indices,” Comparative Political Studies, 35, 1: 5–34.Google Scholar
Myerson, Roger. 1993. “Effectiveness of Electoral Systems for Reducing Government Corruption,” Games and Economic Behavior, 5: 118–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nassmacher, Karl-Heinz. 1989. “Structure and Impact of Public Subsidies to Political Parties in Europe,” in Alexander, Herbert, ed. Comparative Political Finance in the 1980s. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 236–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nello, Susan Senior. 2001. “The Role of the IMF,” in Zielonka, Jan, and Pravda, Alex, eds. Democratic Consolidation in Eastern Europe. Vol. 2: International and Transnational Factors. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nørgaard, Ole, Ostrovska, Ilze, and Hansen, Ole Hersted. 2000. “State of the State in Post-Communist Latvia: State Capacity and Government Effectiveness in a Newly Independent Country.” Paper presented at the 2000 European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR) Joint Sessions, Copenhagen.
North, Douglass. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, Douglass. 1981. Structure and Change in Economic History. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
North, Douglass, and Weingast, Barry. 1989. “Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutional Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century England,” Journal of Economic History, 49, 4 (December): 803–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novotný, Vít. 1999. “Deset lat po listopadu: Omězme Moc české Politické Oligarchie,” Britské Listy, 29 November.
Nunberg, Barbara. 2000. “Ready for Europe: Public Administration Reform and European Union Accession in Central and Eastern Europe.” World Bank Technical Paper No. 466. Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar
Nunberg, Barbara, ed. 1999. The State After Communism. Washington: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Dwyer, Conor. 2004. “Runaway State Building: How Political Parties Shape States in Postcommunist Eastern Europe,” World Politics: 520–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Dwyer, Conor. 2003. “Expanding the Post-Communist State? A Theory and Some Empirical Evidence.” Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Association for the Advancement of Slavic Studies (AAASS) Toronto, Canada.
O'Dwyer, Conor. 2002. “Civilizing the State Bureaucracy: The Unfulfilled Promise of Public Administration Reform in Poland, Slovakia, and the Czech Republic (1990–2000).” Occasional paper, Berkeley Program in Soviet and Post Soviet Studies.
OECD. 2001a. Issues and Developments in Public Management: Czech Republic–2000.
OECD. 2001b. Issues and Developments in Public Management: Hungry–2000.
Olson, David. 1998. “Party Formation and Party System Consolidation in the New Democracies of Central Europe,” Political Studies, 46, 3: 432–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1993. “Dictatorship, Democracy and Development,” American Political Science Review, 87 (3 September): 567–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neil, Patrick. 1998. Revolution from Within. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
O'Neil, Patrick. 1996. “Revolution from Within: Institutional Analysis, Transitions from Authoritarianisms, and the Case of Hungary,” World Politics, 48, 4 (July): 579–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neil, Patrick. 1993. “Presidential Power in Post-Communist Europe: The Hungarian Case in Comparative Perspective,” Journal of Communist Studies, 9, 3: 177–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orenstein, Mitchell. 2001. Out of the Red: Building Capitalism and Democracy in Postcommunist Europe. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Örkény, Antal, and Scheppele, Kim Lane. 1999. “Rules of Law: The Complexity of Legality in Hungary,” in Krygier, Martin, and Czarnota, Adam, eds. The Rule of Law After Communism. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Ost, David. 1991. “Shaping a New Politics in Poland.” Program on Central and Eastern Europe Working Paper Series, Center for European Studies (CES) Harvard University, No. 8.
Panków, Irena. 1991. “Przemiany środowiska społecznego Polaków w latach osiemdziesiatych,” Kultura i Społeczenstwo, 1: 53–65.Google Scholar
Parlamentní Zpravodaj. 1999. “Jakě jsou klady a zapory aktualního navrhu novely zakona o politických stranach” [What are the bases for the current proposal for the novelization of the law on political parties].
Pempel, T. J. 2000. Regime Shift: Comparative Dynamics of the Japanese Political Economy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Peltzman, Sam. 1998. Political Participation and Government Regulation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Perkins, Doug. 1996. “Structure and Choice: The Role of Organizations, Patronage, and the Media in Party Formation,” Party Politics, 2, 3: 355–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persson, Torsten, Tabellini, , and Guido, . 2002. Political Economics. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Persson, Torsten, Tabellini, Guido, and Trebbi, Francesco. 2001. Electoral Rules and Corruption. Manuscript, June.
Petroff, Włodzimierz. 1996. Finansowanie partii politycznych w postkomunistycznej Europie [The financing of political parties in Europe]. Warsaw: Polish Parliamentary Bureau of Analyses and Expertise.Google Scholar
Pettai, Vello. 1997. “Political Stability Through Disenfranchisement,” Transition, 3, 6 (4 April).Google Scholar
Pettai, Vello, and Kreuzer, Marcus. 2001. “Institutions and Party Development in the Baltic States,” in Lewis, Paul, ed. Party Development and Democratic Change in Post-Communist Europe. London: Frank Cass, pp. 107–25.Google Scholar
PHARE and NVF. 1998. “An Analysis of Public Administration of the Czech Republic.” Summary Report, Prague, September.
Piattoni, Simona. 2001. “Introduction,” in Piattoni, Simona, ed. Clientelism, Interests, and Democratic Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierre, Jon, Svasand, Lars, and Widfeldt, Anders. 2000. “State Subsidies to Political Parties: Confronting Rhetoric with Reality,” West European Politics, 23, 2 (July): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinto-Duschinsky, Michael. 1985. “How Can Money in Politics Be Assessed?” Paper presented at the International Political Science Conference Paris.
Plakans, Andrejs. 1998. “Democratization and Political Participation in Post-Communist Societies: The Case of Latvia,” in Dawish, Karen, and Parott, Bruce, eds. The Consolidation of Democracy in East-Central Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Plasser, Fritz, Ulram, Peter, and Grausgruber, Alfred. 1992. “The Decline of ‘Lager Mentality’ and the New Model of Electoral Competition in Austria,” in Luther, Kurt Richard, and Müller, Wolfgang, eds. Politics in Austria: Still a Case of Consociationalism? London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Poggi, Gianfranco. 1990. The State: Its Nature, Development, and Prospects. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Powell, Bingham. 2000. Elections as Instruments of Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Protsyk, Oleh. 2003. Reforming Cabinets in Post-Communist Countries: Political Determinants of Cabinet Organization and Size. Manuscript, University of Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1999. “Minimalist Conception of Democracy: A Defense,” in Shapiro, Ian, and Hacker-Cordón, Casiano, eds. Democracy's Value. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 23–55.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1997. “The State in a Market Economy,” in Nelson, Joan, Tilly, Charles, and Walker, Lee, eds. Transforming Post-Communist Political Economies. Washington: National Academy Press, pp. 411–31.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1991. Democracy and Market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1990. The State and the Economy Under Capitalism. London: Harwood Academic.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1995. Sustainable Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pujas, Véronique, and Rhodes, Martin. 1999. “Party Finance and Political Scandal in Italy, Spain, and France,” West European Politics, 22, 3: 41–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raiser, Martin, Di Tommaso, Maria, and Weeks, Melvyn. 2000. “The Measurement and Determinants of Institutional Change: Evidence from Transition Economies.” EBRD Working Paper No. 60.
Reed, Quentin. 2002. “Corruption in Czech Privatization: The Dangers of ‘Neo-Liberal’ Privatization,” in Kotkin, Stephen, and Sajos, Andras, eds. Political Corruption: A Skeptic's Handbook. Budapest: CEU Press, pp. 261–86.Google Scholar
Reed, Quentin. 1996. Political Corruption, Privatization and Control in the Czech Republic. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Oxford University.
Regulski, Jerzy. 1999. “Building Democracy in Poland: The State Reform of 1998.” Discussion Paper 9, Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative. Budapest: Open Society Institute.Google Scholar
Remington, Thomas, and Smith, Steven. 1996. “Institutional Design, Uncertainty, and Path Dependency During Transition,” American Journal of Political Science 40, 4: 1253–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, Eric. 1992. “Public Administration in Post-Socialist Eastern Europe,” Public Administration Review, 52, 2 (March/April): 116–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Bradley. 2001. “Japan's ‘1995 System’ and Beyond,” in Diamond, Larry, and Gunther, Richard, eds. Political Parties and Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, pp. 143–69.Google Scholar
Riker, William. 1982. Liberalism Against Populism. Prospect Heights: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
Riker, William, and Ordeshook, Peter. 1968. “A Theory of the Calculus of Voting,” American Political Science Review, 62: 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, James, and Verdier, Therry. 2002. “The Political Economy of Clientelism.” Centre for Economic Policy Discussion Paper Series No. 3205.
Roland, Gerard. 2001. “Ten Years After … Transition and Economics.” IMF Staff Papers, No. 48. Washington: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
Róna-Tas, Ákos. 1997. The Great Surprise of the Small Transformation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1999. Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1978. Corruption. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Roubini, Nouriel, and Sachs, Jeffrey. 1989. “Government Spending and Budget Deficits in the Industrial Economies.” NBER Working Papers No. 2919, National Bureau of Economic Research.
Rus, Andrej. 1996. “Quasi Privatization: From Class Struggle to a Scuffle of Small Particularisms,” in Benderly, Jill, and Kraft, Evan, eds. Independent Slovenia: Origins, Movements, Prospects. New York: St. Martin's Press, pp. 225–50.Google Scholar
Rybář, Marek. 2006. “Powered by the State: The Role of Public Resources in Party-Building in Slovakia,” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 22, 3 (September): 320–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rydlewski, Grzegorz. 2000. Rządzenie Koalicyjne w Polsce. Warsaw: Elipsa.Google Scholar
Sadurski, Wojciech, ed. 2002. Constitutional Justice, East and West: Democratic Legitimacy and Constitutional Courts in Post-Communist Europe. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Sajo, Andras. 1998a. “Corruption, Clientelism, and the Future of the Constitutional State in Eastern Europe,” East European Constitutional Review, 7, 2. Available at http://www.law.nyu.edu/eecr/vol7num2.Google Scholar
Sajo, Andras. 1998b. “How the Rule of Law Can Facilitate the Spread of Sleaze,” East European Constitutional Review. 7, 2. Available at http://www.law.ngu.edu/eecr/vol7num 2.Google Scholar
Samuels, David. 2001. “Does Money Matter? Credible Commitments and Campaign Finance in New Democracies,” Comparative Politics, 34, 1 (October): 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1976. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scarrow, Susan. 2002. “Parties Without Members?” in Dalton, Russell, and Wattenberg, Martin, eds. Parties Without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schamis, Hector E. 2002. Re-Forming the State: The Politics of Privatization in Latin America and Europe. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schavio-Campo, Salvatore, do Tommaso, G., and Mukherjee, A. 1997a. “Government Employment and Pay in Global Perspective.” Washington: World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 1771.
Schavio-Campo, Salvatore, do Tommaso, G., and Mukherjee, A. 1997b. “An International Statistical Survey of Government Employment and Wages.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 1806.
Scheppele, Kim Lane. 2002. “Democracy by Judiciary.” Paper presented at the conference. Rethinking the Rule of Law in Post-Communist Europa: Past Legacies, Institutional Innovations, and Constitutional Discourses, EUI, Florence, 22–3 February.
Scherpereel, John. 2003. “Appreciating the Third Player: The European Union and the Politics of Civil Service Reform in East Central Europe.” Paper prepared for presentation at the Annual Meeting of American Political Science Association (APSA), Philadelphia, 28–31 August.
Schumpeter, Joseph. 1948. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James. 1972. Comparative Political Corruption. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Shefter, Martin. 1994. Political Parties and the State: The American Experience. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shleifer, Andrei, and Vishny, Robert W. 1998. The Grabbing Hand: Government Pathologies and Their Cures. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Shleifer, Andrei, and Vishny, Robert W.. 1993. “Corruption,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108: 599–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SIGMA. 2002a. “Bulgaria: Public Service and the Administrative Framework: Assessment 2002.”
SIGMA. 2002b. “Czech Republic: Public Service and the Administrative Framework: Assessment 2002.”
SIGMA 2002c. “Latvia: Public Service and the Administrative Framework: Assessment 2002.”
SIGMA. 2002d. “Slovakia: Public Service and the Administrative Framework: Assessment 2002.”
SIGMA. 1999. Public Management Profiles of Central and East European Countries: Estonia. October.
Sikk, Allan. 2006. “From Private Organizations to Democratic Infrastructure: Political Parties and the State in Estonia,” Journal of Communist Studies and Transitional Politics, 22, 3 (September): 341–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sikk, Allan. 2003. “A Cartel Party System in a Post-Communist Country? The Case of Estonia.” Paper prepared for the European Constitution for Political Review (ECPR) General Conference, 18–21 September, Marborg, Germany.
Sjöblom, Gunnar. 1983. “Political Change and Political Accountability: A Propositional Inventory of Causes and Effects,” in Daalder, Hans, and Peter, Mair, eds. West European Party Systems. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Skach, Cindy, and Stepan, Alfred. 1993. “Constitutional Frameworks and Democratic Consolidation: Parliamentarianism Versus Presidentialism,” World Politics, 46, 1: 1–22.Google Scholar
Slovak Government Information Service. 2000. “Audit súladu činností a financovania ústredných orgánov štátnej správy” [Audit of the activities and finances of the central institutions of public administration]. August. Also available at http://www.vlada.gov.sk/INFOSERVIs/.
Slovak Government Information Service. 1999. “Analysis of the Inherited State of the Economy and Society.”
Smith, David, Pabriks, Artis, Purs, Aldis, and Lane, Thomas. 2002. The Baltic States. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smith, Karen. 2001. “The Promotion of Democracy,” in Zielonka, Jan, and Pravda, Alex, eds. Democratic Consolidation in Eastern Europe. Vol. 2: International and Transnational Factors. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 31–57.Google Scholar
Smithey, Shannon Ishiyama, and Ishiyama, John. 2000. “Judicious Choices: Designing Courts in Post-Communist Politics,” Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 33: 163–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snipe, Arta. 2003. Financing of Political Parites: Effectiveness of Regulation. The Latvian Example. Master's Thesis, Riga Graduate School of Law, Riga, Latvia.
Spar, Deborah. 1994. The Cooperative Edge: The Internal Politics of International Cartels. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Spruyt, Hendrik. 1992. The Sovereign State and Its Competitors. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Staniszkis, Jadwiga. 1999. Post-Socialism. Warsaw: PAN.Google Scholar
Stark, David, and Bruszt, Laszlo. 1998. Postsocialist Pathways. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stein, Jonathan. 1998. “Still in Bed Together.” New Presence (January). Available at http://www.new-presence.in.
Stepan, Alfred. 1994. “Corruption in South America,” in Trang, Due, ed. Corruption and Democracy. Budapest: CEU.Google Scholar
Stigler, George. 1975. The Citizen and the State. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Stigler, George. 1972. “Economic Competition and Political Competition,” Public Choice, 13: 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroehlein, Andrew. 1999. “The Czech Republic 1992 to 1999,” Central Europe Review. (13 September). Available at http://www.ce-review:org.
Strøm, Kaare. 2000. “Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies,” European Journal of Political Research, 37: 261–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strøm, Kaare. 1990. Minority Government and Majority Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strøm, Kaare. 1989. “Inter-Party Competition in Advanced Democracies,” Journal of Theoretical Politics, 1, 3: 277–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suleiman, Ezra N. 2003. Dismantling Democratic States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Swaniewiuz, Pawet. 2004. Consolidation or Fragmentation? Budapest: Open Society Institute.Google Scholar
Szabó, Gábor. 1993. “Administrative Transition in a Post-Communist Society: The Case of Hungary,” Hesse, Joachim Jens, ed. Administrative Transformation in Central and Eastern Europe. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Szczerbak, Aleks. 2006. “State Party Funding and Patronage in Post-1989 Poland,” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 22, 3 (September): 298–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szelenyi, Ivan, and Szelenyi, Sonya. 1991. “The Vacuum in Hungarian Politics: Classes and Parties,” New Left Review (May–June): 121–37.Google Scholar
Szoboszlai, György, 1985a. “Bureaucracy and Social Control,” in Szoboszlai, György, ed. Politics and Public Administration in Hungary. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Szoboszlai, György, ed. 1985b. Politics and Public Administration in Hungary. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Szomolányi, Soňa. 1997. “Identifying Slovakia's Emerging Regime,” in Szomolányi, Soňa, and Gould, John, eds. Slovakia: Problems of Democratic Consolidation. Bratislava: Friedrich Ebert Foundation, pp. 9–34.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 1990. “Maintaining Hegemony in Italy: ‘The Softer They Rise, the Slower They Fall,’” in Pempol, T. J ., ed. Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp. 306–32.Google Scholar
Terra, Jonathan. 2002. “Political Institutions and Post Communist Transitions.” Paper prepared for the Fourth Annual Society for Comparative Research Graduate Student Retreat, Budapest, May.
Thayer, Nathaniel. 1969. How the Conservatives Rule Japan. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1990. Coercion, Capital, and European States. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tisenkopfs, Tālis, and Kalniņš, Valts. 2002. “Public Accountability Procedures in Politics in Latvia.” Report, Baltic Studies Center, Riga, Latvia, February.
Todorova, Rossitsa. 2001. “EU Integration as an Agent of Public Administration Reform.” Unpublished Manuscript, American University in Bulgaria.
Toonen, Theo. 1993. “Analysing Institutional Change,” in Hesse, Joachim Jens, ed. Administrative Transformation in Central and Eastern Europe. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Torres-Bartyzel, Claudia, and Kacprowicz, Grażyna. 1999. “The National Civil Service System in Poland,” in Verheijen, Tony, ed. Civil Service Systems in Central and Eastern Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 159–83.Google Scholar
Trang, Duc, ed. 1994. Corruption and Democracy. Budapest: CEN Press.Google Scholar
Treisman, Daniel. 2000. “The Causes of Corruption: A Cross-National Study,” Journal of Public Economics, 76: 399–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treisman, Daniel. 1998. “Dollars and Democratization: The Role and Power of Money in Russia's Transitional Elections,” Comparative Politics, 31, 1 (October): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tullock, Gordon. 1967. “The Welfare Costs of Tariffs, Monopolies and Theft,” Western Economic Journal, 5: 224–32.Google Scholar
Turner, Arthur. 1993. “Postauthoritarian Elections: Testing Expectations about ‘First’ Elections,”Comparative Political Studies, 26, 3 (October): 330–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
USAID public opinion poll. 1999. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty broadcast, Slovakia, 10 November.
Úsek pro Reformu Veřejné správy. [Section for the Reform of the Public Administration]. 2001. “Vybrané výstupy z projekty PHARE CZ 9808.01 Posílení institucionálních a administrativních kapacit pro implementaci acquis communautaire.” Prague.
Vachudová, Milada Anna. 2005. Europe Undivided: Democracy, Leverage and Integration After Communism. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, ch. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanagunas, Stan. 1997. “Civil Service Reform in the Baltics.” Paper presented for conference on Civil Service Systems in Comparative Perspective, Indiana University Bloomington, 5–8 April.
Biezen, Ingrid. 2004. “Political Parties as Public Utilities,” Party Politics, 10, 6: 701–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biezen, Ingrid. 2000. “Party Financing in New Democracies,” Party Politics, 6, 3: 329–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biezen, Ingrid, and Kopecký, Petr. 2001. “On the Predominance of State Money: Reassessing Party Financing in the New Democracies of Southern and Eastern Europe,” Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 2, 3: 401–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vass, Lászlo. 1994. “Changes in Hungary's Governmental System,” in Ágh, Attila, ed. The Emergence of West Central European Parliaments: The First Steps. Budapest: Hungarian Center for Democracy Studies, pp. 186–97.Google Scholar
Verheijen, Tony. 2002. “The European Union and Public Administration Development in Central and Eastern Europe,” in Baker, Randall, ed. Transitions from Authoritarianism: The Role of the Bureaucracy. London: Praeger.Google Scholar
Verheijen, Tony. 1999. “The Civil Service of Bulgaria: Hope on the Horizon,” in Verheijen, Tony, ed. Civil Service Systems in Central and Eastern Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 92–130.Google Scholar
Vinton, Lucy. 1993. Poland's New Election Law: Fewer Parties, Same Impasse? RFE/RL Report (8 July): 7–17.Google Scholar
Vládní program boje proti korupci v Česke Republice. [Government program for the fight against corruption in the Czech Republic]. 1998. “Zpráva o korupci v České republice a možnostech účinného postupu proti tomut negativnímu společenskému jevu.” [Report about corruption in the Czech Republic and the possibilities of an active approach against this negative social development], 17 February.
Vreeland, James Raymond. 2003. The IMF and Economic Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walecki, Marcin, ed. 2002. Finansowanie Polityki. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Sejmowe.Google Scholar
Warner, Carolyn. 2001. “Mass Parties and Clientelism: France and Italy,” in Piattoni, Simona, ed. Clientelism, Interests, and Democratic Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 122–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasilewski, Jacek, 2000. “Polish Post-Transitional Elite,” in Frentzel-Zagórska, Janina, and Wasilewski, Jacek, eds. Warsaw: PAN ISP. The Second Generation of Democratic Elites in East and Central Europe.Google Scholar
Waterbury, John. 1973. “Endemic and Planned Corruption in a Monarchical Regime,” World Politics, 25, 4 (July): 533–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Max. 1947. Wirtschaft und Gesellshaft. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
Weingast, Barry. 1997. “The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of Law,” American Political Science Review, 91 (June): 245–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weingast, Barry, and Marshall, William. 1988. “The Industrial Organization of Congress; or, Why Legislatures, Like Firms, Are Not Organized as Markets,” Journal of Political Economy, 96, 1: 132–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winiecki, Jan. 1996. “Impediments to Institutional Change in the Former Soviet System,” in Alston, Lee., eds. Empirical Studies in Institutional Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 63–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittman, Donald. 1995. The Myth of Democratic Failure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
World Bank. 1999. Corruption in Poland: Review of Priority Areas and Proposals for Action. Warsaw: World Bank.
Zemanovičová, Daniela, and Sičáková, xsEmília. 2001. “Transparency and Corruption,” in Mesežnikov, Miroslav, Grigorij, Kollár, and Nicholson, Tom, eds. Slovakia 2001. Bratislava: Institute for Public Affairs, pp. 537–52.Google Scholar
Zielonka, Jan. 1994. “New Institutions in the Old East Bloc,” Journal of Democracy, 5: 87–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Žižmond, Egon. 1993. “Slovenia–One Year of Independence,” Europe-Asia Studies, 45, 5: 887–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckerman, Alan. 1979. The Politics of Faction: Christian Democratic Rule in Italy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ades, Alberto, and Di Tella, Rafael. 1999. “Rents, Competition, and Corruption,” American Economic Review, 89, 4 (September): 982–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ades, Alberto, and Di Tella, Rafael. 1997. “The New Economics of Corruption: A Survey and Some New Results,” Political Studies, 45, 3: 496–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ades, Alberto, and Di Tella, Rafael. 1995. “Competition and Corruption.” Applied Economics Discussion Paper Series No. 169. Oxford University.
Ágh, Attila, ed. 1994. The First Steps. Budapest: Hungarian Center of Democracy Studies.Google Scholar
Ágh, Attila, and Kurtán, Sándor. 1996. “‘Parliaments’ and ‘Organized Interests’ in Civil Society: Local Government Legislation and Elections in Hungary (1990–1995),” in Ágh, Attila, and Ilonszki, Gabriella, eds. Parliaments and Organized Interests: The Second Steps. Budapest: Hungarian Center for Democracy Studies.Google Scholar
Ákos, Róna-Tas. 1997. The Great Surprise of the Small Transformation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Albats, Yevgenia. 2003. The State Within a State: The KGB and Its Hold on Russia. Ph.D. Dissertation, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Aldrich, John. 1995. Why Parties? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allina-Pisano, Jessica. 2005. “Informal Politics and Challenges to Democracy: Administrative Resource in Kuchma's Ukraine.” Unpublished Manuscript, Harvard University.
Amsden, Alice, Kochanowicz, Jacek, and Taylor, Lance. 1994. The Market Meets Its Match. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ansell, Christopher, and Burris, Arthur. 1997. “Bosses of the City Unite! Labor Politics and Political Machine Consolidation, 1870–1910,” Studies in American Political Development, 11 (Spring): 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appel, Hilary. 2004. A New Capitalist Order: Privatization and Ideology in Russia and Eastern Europe. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appel, Hilary. 2001. “Corruption and the Collapse of the Czech Transition Miracle,” East European Politics and Societies, 15, 3: 528–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arian, Alan, and Barnes, Samuel. 1974. “The Dominant Party System: A Neglected Model of Democratic Stability,” Journal of Politics, 36, 1: 592–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auers, Daunis. 2002/2003. “Latvia's 2002 Elections: Dawn of a New Era?” East European Constitutional Review, 11/12, 4/1 (Fall/Winter): 106–10.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert. 1970. Conflict of Interest. Chicago: Markham.Google Scholar
Baldersheim, Harald, et al. 1996. “New Institutions of Local Government: A Comparison,” in Baldersheim, Harald, Illner, Michal, Offerdal, Audun, Rose, Lawrence, and Swaniewicz, Paweł, eds. Local Democracy and the Processes of Transformation in East-Central Europe. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, Andrew. 2003. “Comparative Theft: Context and Choice in the Hungarian Czech, and Russian Transformations 1989–2000,” East European Politics and Societies, 17, 3: 533–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, David. 1997. The Political Economy of Dual Transformations. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, David. 1996. “Democracy, Institutional Change, and Stabilization Policy in Hungary,” Europe-Asia Studies, 48, 1: 47–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartolini, Stefano. 1999–2000. “Collusion, Competition, and Democracy,” Journal of Theoretical Politics, 11, 4: 435–70; 12, 1: 33–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartolini, Stefano. 2002. “Electoral and Party Competition: Analytical Dimensions and Empirical Problems,” in Gunther, Richard, Montero, Jose Ramon, and Linz, Juan, eds. Political Parties. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 84–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartolini, Stefano, and Mair, Peter. 1990. Identity, Competition, and Electoral Availability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barzelay, Michael. 1997. “Central Audit Institutions and Performance Auditing,” Governance, 10, 3: 235–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, Robert. 1981. Markets and States in Tropical Africa. Berkeley: UC Press.Google Scholar
Bendor, Jonathan, Glazer, A., Hammond, T. 2001. “Theories of Delegation,” Annual Review of Political Science, 4: 235–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Colin. 1997. “Understanding Ripple Effects: The Cross-National Adoption of Policy Instruments for Bureaucratic Accountability,” Governance, 10, 3: 213–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benoit, Kenneth. 2004. “Models of Electoral System Change,” Electoral Studies, 23: 363–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benoit, Kenneth, and Hayden, Jacqueline. 2004. “Institutional Change and Persistence: The Evolution of Poland's Electoral System, 1989–2001,” Journal of Politics, 66, 2: 396–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bercík, Peter, and Nemec, Juraj. 1999. “The Civil Service System of the Slovak Republic,” in Verheijen, Tony, ed. Civil Service Systems in Central and Eastern Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 184–210.Google Scholar
Bernhard, Michael. 2000. “Institutional Choice After Communism,” East European Politics and Societies, 3: 316–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bielasiak, Jack. 1983. “The Party: Permanent Crisis,” in Brumberg, Abraham, ed. Poland: Genesis of a Revolution. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Birch, Sarah. 2002. Electoral Systems and Political Transformation in Post-Communist Europe. London: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Birch, Sarah. 2001. “Electoral Systems and Party System Stability in Post-Communist Europe.” Paper presented at American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, 30 August–2 September 2001, San Francisco.
Birnir, Jóhanna Kristín. 2005. “Public Venture Capital and Party Institutionalization,” Comparative Political Studies, 38, 8 (October): 915–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruszt, Laszlo, and Stark, David. 1991. “Remaking the Political Field in Hungary: From the Politics of Confrontation to the Politics of Competition,” Journal of International Affairs, 45, 1 (Summer): 201–45.Google Scholar
Brym, Robert, and Gimpelson, Vladimir. 2004. “The Size, Composition, and Dynamics of the Russian State Bureaucracy in the 1990s,” Slavic Review, 63, 1: 90–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, James, and Tullock, Gordon. 1963. The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Bugaric, Bojan. 2005. “The Europeanization of National Administrations in Central and Eastern Europe: Creating Formal Structures Without Substance?” Paper prepared for the Apres Enlargement Workshop, EUI, Florence, 29–30 April.
Bukowska, Xymena, and Czesnik, Mikołaj. 2002. “Analiza Treści Programów Wyborczych,” in Markowski, Radoslaw, ed. System Partyjny I Zachowania Wyborcze. Warsaw: ISP PAN.Google Scholar
Bunce, Valerie. 2001. “Democratization and Economic Reform,” Annual Review of Political Science, 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunce, Valerie. 1999. “The Political Economy of Postsocialism,” Slavic Review 58, 4: 756–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvo, Ernesto, and Murillo, Maria Victoria. 2004. “Who Delivers? Partisan Clients in the Argentine Electoral Market,” American Journal of Political Science, 48 (4 October): 742–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, John. 2000. “Parchment, Equilibria, and Institutions,” Comparative Political Studies, 33, 6/7: 735–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, Daniel. 2001. The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy.Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
CBOS. 2000. “Finansowanie partii politycznych.” Komunikat z badań (Fall).
Cekota, Jaromir, Gönenç, Rauf, and Kwang-Yeol Yoo. 2002. “Strengthening the Management of Public Spending in Hungary,” OECD Economics Department Working Paper No. 336 (30 July).
Center for Study of Democracy. 2004. Brief. Bulgaria Sofia (July). Available at http://www.csd.bg, accessed 19 November 2004.
Čigāne, Lolita. 2002. “A Reflection of the Shortcomings in Legislation on Party Financing in the 2001 Finance Declarations.” Soros Foundation Latvia and Transparency International “delna,” Riga Latvia (April). Available at http://www.politika.lv.
Cirtautas, Arista. 1995. “The Post-Leninist State: A Conceptual and Empirical Examination,” Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 28, 4: 379–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colazingari, Silvia, and Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1998. “Corruption in a Paternalistic Democracy: Lessons from Italy for Latin America,” Political Science Quarterly, 113, 3: 447–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, David, and Levitsky, Steven. 1997. “Research Note: Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research,” World Politics, 49, 3: 430–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colomer, Josep. 1995. “Strategies and Outcomes in Eastern Europe,” Journal of Democracy, 6, 2: 74–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comisso, Ellen. 1986. “State Structures, Political Processes, and Collective Choice in CMEA States,” in Comisso, Ellen, and Tyson, Laura D'Andrea, eds. Power, Purpose, and Collective Choice: Economic Strategy in Socialist States. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Coppedge, Michael. 2001. “Political Darwinism in Latin America's Lost Decade,” in Larry, Diamond, and Richard, Gunther, eds. Political Parties and Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, pp. 173–205.Google Scholar
Coppedge, Michael. 1993. “Parties and Society in Mexico and Venezuela: Why Competition Matters,” Comparative Political Studies, 26, 1 (April): 253–74.Google Scholar
Cotta, Maurizio. 1996. “Structuring the New Party Systems after the Dictatorship,” in Pridham, Geoffrey, and Lewis, Paul, eds. Stabilising Fragile Democracies. London: Routledge, pp. 69–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crenson, Matthew, and Ginsberg, Benjamin. 2004. Downsizing Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
Crombrugghe, Alain de. 1997. “Wage and Pension Pressure on the Polish Budget.” Report for World Bank Project RPO 678–96, Policy Research Working Paper No. 1793.
Czabański, Krzysztof. 2003. “Rywin TV.” Wprost, 26 October.
Dallek, Robert. 1998. Flawed Giant: Lyndon B. Johnson, 1960–1973. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mesquita, Bruce Bueno. 1974. “Need for Achievement and Competitiveness as Determinants of Political Party Success in Elections and Coalitions,” American Political Science Review, 68, 3: 1207–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Porta, Donatella. 2000. “Political Parties and Corruption: 17 Hypotheses on the Interactions Between Parties and Corruption.” EUI Working Papers RSC 2000/60, European University Institute, Fiesole, San Domenico, Italy.
Della Porta, Donatella, and Meny, Yves, eds. 1997. Democracy and Corruption in Europe. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
Della Porta, Donatella, and Vannucci, Alberto Vannucci. 1997. “The ‘Perverse Effects’ of Political Corruption,” Political Studies, 45, 3: 516–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demsetz, Harold. 1982. Economic, Legal, and Political Dimensions of Competition. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Di Palma, Giuseppe. 1990. “Establishing Party Dominance,” in Pempel, T. J., ed. Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Diermeier, Daniel, and Merlo, Antonio. 2000. “Government Turnover in Parliamentary Democracies,” Journal of Economic Theory, 94: 46–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dnitrova, Zoya. 2002. Financing Election Campaigns. Unpublished Manuscript. Ljabljana: Peace Institute.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Duverger, Maurice. 1965. Political Parties. New York: Wiley and Sons, p. 308.Google Scholar
Dyson, Kenneth. 1977. “Party, State, and Bureaucracy in Western Germany.” Sage Professional Papers in Comparative Politics, No. 01-063. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
East European Constitutional Review. 2001. (Winter). Available at http://www.balticsworldwide.com/wkcrier/0301_0322_99.htm, accessed February 9, 2006. RFE/RL OMRI Daily Digest Report, 29 July 1996.
Ekiert, Grzegorz. 2001. The State After State Socialism: Poland in Comparative Perspective. Unpublished Manuscript. Harvard University.Google Scholar
Ekiert, Grzegorz, and Zielonka, Jan. 2003. “Introduction: Academic Boundaries and Path Dependencies Facing the EU's Eastward Enlargement,” East European Politics and Societies, 17, 1 (Winter): 7–23.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon, Offe, Claus, and Preuss, Ulrich K. 1998. Institutional Design in Post-Communist Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enyedi, Zsolt. 2006. “Party Politics in Post-Communist Transition,” in Katz, Richard, and Crotty, William, eds. Handbook of Party Politics. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Enyedi, Zsolt. 2003. “Cleavage Formation in Hungary: The Role of Agency.” Paper presented at the 2003 Joint Sessions of the ECPR Edinburgh.
Enyedi, Zsolt. 1996. “Organizing a Sub-Cultural Party in Eastern Europe,” Party Politics, 2, 3: 377–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, David, and O'Halloryn, Sharyn. 1994. “Administrative Procedures, Information, and Agency Discretion,” American Journal of Political Science, 38/3: 697–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Union Commission. 2000. Regular Report on the Czech Republic's Progress Towards Accession. Brussels: EU.
Evans, Peter, Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, and Skocpol, Theda, eds. 1985. Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eyal, Gil, Szelényi, Ivan, and Townsley, Eleanor. 1998. Making Capitalism Without Capitalists. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Fainsod, Merle. 1963. Bureaucracy and Modernization. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Fainsod, Merle. 1958. Smolensk Under Soviet Rule. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fainsod, Merle. 1953. How Russia Is Ruled. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fearon, James. 1999. “Electoral Accountability and the Control of Politicians: Selecting Good Types Versus Sanctioning Poor Performance,” in Stokes, Susan, Przeworski, Adam, and Manin, Bernard, eds. Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, John. 1999. “Accountability and Authority: Toward a Theory of Political Accountability,” in Stokes, Susan, Przeworski, Adam, and Manin, Bernard, eds. Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 131–53.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, John. 1986. “Incumbent Performance and Electoral Control,” Public Choice, 30: 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fidrmuc, Jan, Fidrmuc, Jarko, and Horvath, Julius. 2002. “Visegrad Economies: Growth Experience and Prospects.” GDN Global Research Project: Determinants of Economic Growth.
Firmin-Sellers, Kathryn. 1995. “The Politics of Property Rights,” American Political Science Review, 89, 4: 867–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, M. Steven. 1998. “The Determinants of Economic Reform in the Postcommunist World,” East European Politics and Societies, 12: 31–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, Freedom. 2002. Nations in Transit, 2001. Washington: Freedom House.Google Scholar
Frič, Pavol. 1999. Korupce na český způsob. Prague: G Plus G.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Carl, and Brzezinski, Zbigniew. 1956. Totalitarian Dictatorship and Autocracy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Frydman, Roman, Murphy, Kenneth, and Rapaczynski, Andrzej. 1998. Capitalism with a Comrade's Face. Budapest: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
Frye, Timothy. 2002. “The Perils of Polarization,” World Politics, 54 (April), pp. 308–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frye, Timothy. 1997. “A Politics of Institutional Choice: Post-Communist Presidencies,” Comparative Political Studies, 30: 523–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganev, Venelin. 2005. Preying on the State: State Formation in Post-Communist Bulgaria (1989–1997). Unpublished Manuscript.
Ganev, Venelin. 2000. “Post-Communism as a Historical Episode of State Building, or Explaining the Weakness of the Post-Communist State.” Paper presented at the twelfth International Conference of Europeanists Chicago, March.
Gazsó, Ferenc. 1992. “Cadre Bureaucracy and the Intelligentsia,” Journal of Communist Studies (September): 76–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 1994. The Politician's Dilemma. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Geddes, Barbara, and Neto, Artur Ribeiro. 1992. “Institutional Sources of Corruption in Brazil,” Third World Quarterly, 4: 641–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gimpelson, Vladimir, and Treisman, Daniel. 2002. “Fiscal Games and Public Employment,” World Politics, 54: 145–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetz, Klaus H. 2001. “Making Sense of Post-Communist Central Administration: Modernization Europeanization or Latinization?” Journal of European Public Policy, 8, 6 (December): 1032–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetz, Klaus, and Margetts, Helen. 1999. “The Solitary Center: The Core Executive in Central and Eastern Europe,” Governance, 12, 4 (October): 425–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golden, Miriam, and Chang, Eric. 2001. “Competitive Corruption: Factional Conflict and Political Malfeasance in Postwar Italian Christian Democracy,” World Politics, 53: 588–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldsmith, Arthur. 1999. “Africa's Overgrown State Reconsidered,” World Politics, 4: 520–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Government of the Czech Republic. 1998. “Programové prohlašení Vlády České Republiky” [Programmatic declaration of the Government of the Czech Republic] (27 January). Available at http://www.vlada.cz/ASC/urad/historie/vlada98/dokumenty/progrprohl.il2.htm.
Government of the Republic of Slovakia. 2001. “Správa o boji proti korupcii na Slovensku.” [Report of the Slovak government]. October. Available at http://www.government.gov.sk, accessed 23 November 2002.
Grabbe, Heather. 2001. “How Does Europeanization Affect CEE Governance? Conditionality, Diffusion, and Diversity,” Journal of European Public Policy, 8, 6 (December): 1013–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, Kenneth. 2004. Defeating Dominance: Opposition Party Building and Mexico's Democratization in Comparative Perspective. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.
Gros, Daniel, and Suhcrke, Marc. 2000. “Ten Years After: What Is Special About Transition Countries?” EBRD Working Paper No. 56, August.
Grzymała-Busse, Anna. 2004. “Informal Institutions and the Post-Communist State.” Paper prepared for the Conference on the Role of Ideas in Post-Communist Politics: A Re-Evaluation Havighurst Center, Luxembourg, 5–9 July.
Grzymała-Busse, Anna. 2003. “Political Competition and the Politicization of the State,” Comparative Political Studies, 36, 10 (December): 1123–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grzymała-Busse, Anna. 2002. Redeeming the Communist Past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grzymała-Busse, Anna, and Innes, Abby. 2003. “Great Expectations: The EU and Domestic Political Competition in East Central Europe,” East European Politics and Societies, 17, 1: 64–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grzymała-Busse, Anna, and Jones Luong, Pauline. 2002. “Reconceptualizing the Post-Communist State,” Politics and Society, 30, 4 (December): 529–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
György, Istvan. 1999. “The Civil Service System of Hungary,” in Verheijen, Tony, ed. Civil Service Systems in Central and Eastern Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar: 131–58.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1975. Legitimation Crisis. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
Hadenius, Stig. 1985. Swedish Politics During the 20th Century. Boras: Swedish Institute.Google Scholar
Hegedüs, József. 1999. “Hungarian Local Government,” in Emil, Kirchner, ed., Decentralization and Transition in the Visegrad. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Heidenheimer, Arnold J., Johnston, Michael, and Levine, Victor, eds. 1989. Political Corruption. New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
Hellman, Joel. 1998. “Winners Take All: The Politics of Partial Reform,” World Politics, 50, 2 (January): 203–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellman, Joel, and Kaufmann, Daniel. 2001. “Confronting the Challenge of State Capture in Transition Economics,” Finance and Development, 38, 3 (September).Google Scholar
Hellman, Joel, Jones, Geraint, and Kaufmann, Daniel. 2000. “Seize the State, Seize the Day.” World Bank Policy Research Paper No. 2444.
Hendley, Katherine. 1996. Trying to Make Law Matter. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrera, Yoshiko. 2001. “Russian Economic Reform 1991–1998,” in Barany, Zoltan, and Moser, Robert, eds. Challenges to Democratic Transition In Russia. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hesse, Joachim Jens. 1993. “From Transformation to Modernization: Administrative Change in Central and Eastern Europe,” in idem. ed. Administrative Transformation in Central and Eastern Europe. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Heywood, Paul. 1997. “Political Corruption: Problems and Perspectives,” Political Studies, 45, 3: 417–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirszowicz, Maria. 1980. The Bureaucratic Leviathan. Oxford: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
Hojnacki, William. 1996. “Politicization as a Civil Service Dilemma,” in Bekke, Hans, Perry, James, and Toonen, Theo, eds. Civil Service Systems in Comparative Perspective. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 137–64.Google Scholar
Holmes, Stephen. 1996. “Cultural Legacies or State Collapse: Probing the Post-Communist Dilemma,” in Mandelbaum, Michael, ed. Postcommunism: Four Perspectives. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.Google Scholar
Holmstrom, Bengt. 1982. “Managerial Incentive Problems: A Dynamic Perspective,” in Essays in Economic and Management in Honor of Lars Wahlbeck. Stockholm: Swedish School of Economics.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Shale, and Petréš, Martin. 2003. “Pride and Prejudice in Prague: Understanding Early Policy Error and Belsteol Reform in Czech Economic Transition,” East European Politics and Societies, 17, 2: 231–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horráth, Tamás, ed. 2000. Decentralization: Experiments and Reforms. Budapest: Open Society Institute.Google Scholar
Hough, Jerry. 1969. The Soviet Prefects. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hough, Jerry, and Fainsod, Merle. 1979. How the Soviet Union Is Governed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Howard, Marc Morjé. 2003. The Weakness of Civil Society in Post-Communist Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, John, and Shipan, Charles. 2002. Deliberate Discretion? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphrey, Caroline. 2002. The Unmaking of Soviet Life. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hutchcroft, Paul. 1998. Booty Capitalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Ichino, Nahomi. 2006. Thugs and Voters: Political Tournaments in Nigeria. Ph.D. Thesis Department of Political Science, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Ikstens, Jānis, Smilov, Daniel, and Walecki, Marcin. 2002. “Campaign Finance in Central and Eastern Europe,” IFES Reports (April). Washington: IFES.Google Scholar
Ilonszki, Gabriella. 2002. “A Functional Clarification of Parliamentary Committees in Hungary, 1990–1998,” in Olson, David, and Crowther, William, eds. Committees in Post-Communist Democratic Parliaments: Comparative Institutionalization. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, pp. 21–43.Google Scholar
Ilonszki, Gabriella. 2000. “The Second Generation Political Elite in Hungary: Partial Consolidation,” in Frentzel-Zagórska, Janina, and Wasilewski, Jacek, eds. The Second Generation of Democratic Elites in East and Central Europe. Warsaw: PAN ISP.Google Scholar
Ilonszki, Gabriella. 1998. “Representation Deficit in a New Democracy: Theoretical Considerations and the Hungarian Case,” Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 14: 157–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
INEKO for the Slovak Government. 2000. “Zaverečná správa o výsledkoch a odporučaniach audity súladu činnosti a financovania úsredných orgánov štátnej správy,” August.
Innes, Abby. 2002. “Party Competition in Post-Communist Europe: The Great Electoral Lottery,” Comparative Politics, 35, 1: 85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Monetary Fund. 1999. Report on Observance of Standards and Codes, August 1999/March 2000.
Ishiyama, John. 1997. “Transitional Electoral Systems in Post-Communist Eastern Europe,” Political Science Quarterly, 112, 1: 95–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Issacharoff, Samuel, and Pildes, Richard. 1998. “Politics as Markets: Partisan Lockups of the Democratic Process,” Stanford Law Review (February): 642–717.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben, and Wren, Anne. 1998. “Equality, Employment, and Budgetary Restraint,” World Politics, 50, 4: 507–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jabłoński, A. 1998. “Europeanization of Public Administration in Central Europe: Poland in Comparative Perspective.” NATO Individual Democratic Institution Research Fellowships, Final Report 1995–7.
Jackman, Robert. 1993. Power Without Force. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacoby, Wade. 2004. The Enlargement of the EU and NATO: Ordering from the Menu in Central Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarosz, Maria. 2001. Manowce Polskiej Prywatyzacji. Warszawa: PWN SA.Google Scholar
Jednotka boji proti korupci, Ministry of Interior. 2001. Zpráva o korupci v ČR a o plnění harmonogramu opatření vládního programu boje proti korupci v ČR.
Johns, Michael. 2003. “Do as I Say and Not as I Do: The European Union, Eastern Europe, and Minority Rights,” East European Politics and Societies, 17, 4 (November): 682–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones Luong, Pauline. 2002. Institutional Change and Political Continuity in Post-Soviet Central Asia: Power, Perceptions, and Pacts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones Luong, Pauline, and Weinthal, Erika. 2004. “Contra Coercion: Russian Tax Reform, Exogenous Shocks and Negotiated Institutional Change,” American Political Science Review, 98, 1: 139–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jungerstam-Mulders, Susanne, ed. 2006. Post-Communist EU Member States: Parties and Party Systems. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Kalniņš, Valts, and Čigāne, Lolita. 2003. “On the Road Toward a More Honest Society.” Policy Report, January. Available at http://www.politika.lv.
Kaminski, Antoni. 1992. An Institutional Theory of Communist Regimes: Design, Function, and Breakdown. San Francisco: ICS Press.Google Scholar
Kang, David. 2002. Crony Capitalism: Corruption and Development in South Korea and the Philippines. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, Karel. 1993. Aparát ÚV KSC v letech 1948–1968. Sesity Ústavu pro Soudobé Dějiny AV ČR Sv. 10.
Kaplan, Karel. 1987. The Short March: The Communist Takeover of Power in Czechoslovakia, 1945–1948. Boulder CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Karasimeonov, Georgii. 1996. “Bulgaria's New Party System,” in Pridham, Geoffrey, and Lewis, Paul, eds. Stabilizing Fragile Democracies. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karklins, Rasma. 2002. Typology of Post-Communist Corruption, Problems of Post-Communism, 49 (July/August): 22–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karl-Heinz, Nassmacher. 1989. “Structure and Impact of Public Subsidies to Political Parties in Europe,” in Alexander, Herbert, ed. Comparative Political Finance in the 1980s, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 236–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Richard, and Mair, Peter. 1995. “Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy,” Party Politics, 1: 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, Daniel. 2003. “Rethinking Governance: Empirical Lessons Challenge Orthodoxy.” World Bank Working Paper.
Kaufman, Daniel, Kraay, A., and Mastruzzi, M. 2005. Governance Matters IV: Governance Indicators 1996–2004. Washington: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keri, Laszlo. 1994. Balance: The Hungarian Government 1990–1994. Budapest: Korridor.Google Scholar
Kettle, Steve. 1995. “Straining at the Seams.” Transition (April). Available at http://www.tol.cz.
King, Roswitha. 2003. “Conversations with Civil Servants: Interview Results from Estonia, Lithuania, Czech Republic and Poland.” Manuscript, University of Latvia Riga.
Kiss, Csilla. 2003. “From Liberalism to Conservatism: The Federation of Young Democrats in Post-Communist Hungary,” East European Politics and Societies, 16, 3, 739–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 2001. “Divergent Paths of Post-Communist Democracies,” in Diamond, Larry, and Gunther, Richard, eds. Political Parties and Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, pp. 299–323.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 2000. “Linkages Between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Polities,” Comparative Political Studies, 33, 6/7: 845–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert, Mansfeldová, Zdenka, Markowski, Radoslaw, and Toka, Gábor. 1999. Post-Communist Party Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert, and Wilkinson, Steven. Forthcoming. “Citizen-Politician Linkages: An Introduction,” in Kitschelt, and Wilkinson, , eds. Patrons, Clients, and Linkages. Manuscript, Duke University.Google Scholar
KNAB. 2003. “Progress and Results in the Field of Corruption Prevention and Combat,” Periodic Update 24 (November). Available at http://www.knab.gov.lv/ru/actual/article.php?id=18863, accessed 12 February 2004.
Knight, Jack. 1992. Institutions and Social Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochanowicz, Jacek. 1994. “Reforming Weak States and Deficient Bureaucracies,” in Nelson, Joan M., Kochanowicz, Jacek, Mizsei, Kalman, and Munoz, Oscar, eds. Intricate Links: Democratization and Market Reforms in Latin America and Eastern Europe. Washington: Overseas Development Council, pp. 194–206.Google Scholar
Koole, Ruud. 1996. “Cadre, Catch-all or Cartel? A Comment,” Party Politics, 4: 507–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopecký, Petr. 2006. “Political Parties and the State in Post-Communist Europe: The Nature of the Symbiosis,” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 22, 3 (September): 251–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopstein, Jeff, and Reilly, David. 2000. “Geographic Diffusion and the Transformation of the Postcommunist World,” World Politics, 53, 1: 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Körösényi, Andras. 1999. Government and Politics in Hungary. Budapest: CEU Press.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen. 1984. “Approaches to the State: Alternative Conceptions and Historical Dynamics,” Comparative Politics, 16, 2 (January): 223–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krašovec, Alenka. 2001. “Party and State in Democratic Slovenia,” in Lewis, Paul G., ed. Party Development and Democratic Change in Post-Communist Europe. London: Frank Cass, pp. 93–106.Google Scholar
Krause, Kevin Deegan. 2006. Elected Affinities. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Krueger, Anne. 1974. “The Political Economy of the Rent-Seeking Society,” American Economic Review, 64, 3: 291–303.Google Scholar
Krupavičius, Algis. 1998. “The Post-Communist Transition and Institutionalization of Lithuania's Parties,” Political Studies, 46, 3: 465–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunicová, Jana, and Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 2005. “Electoral Rules and Constitutional Structures as Constraints on Corruption,” British Journal of Political Science, 35: 573–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurczewski, Jacek. 1999. “The Rule of Law in Poland,” in Přibán, Jiří, and Young, James, eds. The Rule of Law in Central Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Lancaster, Thomas D., and Montinolla, Gabriella. 2001. “Comparative Political Corruption: Issues of Operationalization and Measurement,” Studies in Comparative International Development, 36, 3 (Fall): 3–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palombara, Joseph. 1994. “Structural and Institutional Aspects of Corruption,” Social Research, 61, 2 (Summer): 325–50.Google Scholar
Laver, Michael, and Shepsle, Kenneth. 1999. “Government Accountability in Parliamentary Democracy,” in Stokes, Susan, Przeworski, Adam, and Manin, Bernard, eds. Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 279–96.Google Scholar
Lawson, Stephanie. 1993. “Conceptual Issues in the Comparative Study of Regime Change and Democratization,” Comparative Politics, 25, 2 (January): 183–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, Margaret. 1997. Consent, Dissent, and Patriotism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levi, Margaret. 1988. Of Rule and Revenue. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Levite, Ariel, and Tarrow, Sidney. 1983. “The Legitimation of Excluded Parties in Dominant Party Systems,” Comparative Politics, 15, 3 (April): 295–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven. 2003. Transforming Labor-Based Parties in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewanski, Rudolf. 1997. “Italian Civil Service: A Pre-Modern Bureaucracy in Transition?” Paper prepared for the Conference on Civil Service Systems in Comparative Perspective, Indiana University, 5–8 April.
Lewis, Paul, and Gortat, Radzisława. 1995. “Models of Party Development and Questions of State Dependence in Poland,” Party Politics, 4: 599–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Paul G. 2000. Political Parties in Post-Communist Eastern Europe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lieven, Anatol. 1994. The Baltic Revolution. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arendt. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arendt, ed. 1992. Parliamentary Versus Presidential Government. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lindberg, Staffan. 2004. The Power of Elections: Democratic Participation, Competition, and Legitimacy in Africa. Lund: Lund University.Google Scholar
Linek, Lukáš. 2002. “Czech Republic,” European Journal of Political Research, 41: 931–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linek, Lukáš, and Rakušanová, Petra. 2002. “Parties in the Parliament: Why, When, and How Do Parties Act in Unity?” Institute of Sociology, Czech Republic Sociological Paper No. 02:9.
Linz, Juan. 1994. “Introduction: Some Thoughts on Presidentialism in PostCommunist Europe,” in Taras, Ray, ed. Postcommunist Presidents. Cambridge, Oxford University Press: 1–14.Google Scholar
Lippert, Barbara, Umbach, Gaby, and Wessels, Wolfgang. 2001. “Europeanization of CEE Executives: EU Membership Negotiations as a Shaping Power,” Journal of European Public Policy, 8 (6 December): 980–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Logue, John, and Einhorn, Eric. 1988. “Restraining the Governors: The Nordic Experience with Limiting the Strong State,” Scandinavian Political Studies, 11, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Łoś, Maria, and Zybertowicz, Andrzej. 1999. “Is Revolution a Solution?” in Krygier, Martin, and Czarnota, Adam, eds. The Rule of Law After Communism. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Lucking, Richard. 2003. Civil Service Training in the Context of Public Administration Reform. New York: United Nations Development Program.Google Scholar
Lupia, Arthur, and McCubbins, Matthew. 2000. “The Institutional Foundations of Political Competence,” in Lupia, Arthur, McCubbins, Mathew D., and Popkin, Samuel L., eds. Elements of Reason: Cognition, Choice, and the Bounds of Rationality. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 47–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupia, Arthur, and McCubbins, Matthew. 2000. Privatizing the Police State. New York, St. Martins.Google Scholar
Luther, Kurt Richard, and Müller, Wolfgang. 1992. Politics in Austria: Still a Case of Consociationalism? London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott. 1993. “Presidentialism, Multipartism, and Democracy: The Difficult Combination,” Comparative Political Studies, 26, 2 (July): 198–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mair, Peter. 1997. Party System Change: Approaches and Interpretations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Mair, Peter. 1995. “Political Parties, Popular Legitimacy, and Public Privilege,” West European Politics, 18, 2 (July): 40–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mair, Peter. 1994. “Party Organizations,” in Katz, Richard, and Mair, Peter, eds. How Parties Organize. New York: Sage, pp. 134–57.Google Scholar
Majone, Giandomenico. 1994. “The Rise of the Regulatory State in Europe,” West European Politics, 12, 3 (July): 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malcická, Lenka. 2001. “Vybrané aspekty financovania politických strán a hnutí v SR” [Selected aspects of party and movement financing in Slovakia]. Manuscript, Bratislava. Available at http://politika.host.sk/prispevky/prispevok_malcicka_financovaniestran.htm, accessed 21 June 2001.
Malová, Darina. 1997. “The Development of Interest Representation in Slovakia After 1989,” in Szomolányi, Soňa, and Gould, John, eds. Slovakia: Problems of Democratic Consolidation. Bratislava: Friedrich Ebert Foundation.Google Scholar
Mann, Michael. 1988. States, War, and Capitalism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
“Marching Backwards: Slovakia's Counterrevolution.” 1995. October. Available at http://project-syndicate.org/surveys/marching_bac.php4, accessed 10 September, 2004.
Mattli, Walter, and Plümper, Thomas. 2002. “The Demand-Side Politics of EU Enlargement: Democracy and the Application for EU Membership,” Journal of European Public Policy, 9, 4: 550–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauro, Paolo. 1998. “Corruption: Causes, Consequences, and Agenda for Further Research,” Finance and Development (March): 11–14.Google Scholar
Mauro, Paolo. 1995. “Corruption and Growth,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 3: 681–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McChesney, Fred. 1987. “Rent Extraction and Rent Creation in the Economic Theory of Regulation,” Journal of Legal Studies, 16: 101–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCubbins, Matthew, Noll, Roger, and Weingast, Barry. 1989. “Structure and Process; Politics and Policy: Administrative Arrangements and the Political Control of Agencies,” Virginia Law Review, 75, 2: 431–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCubbins, Matthew, Noll, Roger, and Weingast, Barry. 1987. “Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control,” Economics and Organization, 77 (March): 243–77.Google Scholar
McFaul, M. 1995. “State Power, Institutional Change, and the Politics of Privatization in Russia,” World Politics, 47, 2: 210–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMann, Kelly. 2003. “The Civic Realm in Kyrgyzstan: Soviet Economic Legacies and Activists' Expectations,” in Jones Luong, Pauline, ed. The Transformation of Central Asia: States and Societies from Soviet Rule to Independence. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp. 213–45.Google Scholar
McMenamin, Iain, and Schoenman, Roger. 2004, “Political Competition: The Rule of Law and Corruption in Successful Post-Communist Countries,” Working Papers in International Studies, 7.Google Scholar
Meltzer, Allan H., and Richard, Scott F. 1981. “Rational Theory of the Size of Government,” Journal of Political Economy, 89, 5: 914–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendilow, Jonathan. 1992. “Public Party Funding and Party Transformation in Multiparty Systems,” Comparative Political Studies, 25, 1 (April): 90–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesežnikov, Grigorij. 2002. “Domestic Politics,” in Mesežnikov, Grigorij, Kollár, Miroslav, and Nicholson, Tom, eds. Slovakia 2001. Bratislava: Institute for Public Affairs, pp. 21–92.Google Scholar
Mesežnikov, Grigorij. 1997. “The Open-Ended Formation of Slovakia's Political Party System,” in Szomolányi, Soňa, and John, Gould, eds. Slovakia: Problems of Democratic Consolidation. Bratislava: Friedrich Ebert Foundation.Google Scholar
Meyer-Sahling, Jan-Hinrik. 2006. “The Rise of the Partisan State? Parties, Patronage, and the Ministerial Bureaucracy in Hungary,” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 22, 3 (September): 274–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, William, Grødeland, Ase, and Koshechkina, Tatyana. 2001. A Culture of Corruption? Coping with Government in Post-Communist Europe. Budapest: CEU Press.Google Scholar
Moe, Terry M. 1990. “Political Institutions: The Neglected Side of the Story,” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 7: 213–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moe, Terry M., and Caldwell, Michael, 1994. “The Institutional Foundations of Democratic Government: A Comparison of Presidential and Parliamentary Systems,” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 150/1: 171–95.Google Scholar
Moe, Terry, and Miller, Goney. 1983. “Bureaucrats, Legislators, and the Size of Government,” American Political Science Review, 77: 297–323.Google Scholar
Montinola, Gabriella, and Jackman, Robert. 2002. “Source of Corruption: A Cross-Country Study,” British Journal of Political Science, 32, 1 (January): 147–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew, and Vachudová, Milada Anna. 2003. “National Interests, State Power and EU Enlargement,” East European Politics and Societies, 4, 17, 1 (Winter): 42–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morlino, Leonardo. 2001. “The Three Phases of Italian Parties,” in Diamond, Larry, and Gunter, Richard, eds. Political Parties and Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, pp. 109–42.Google Scholar
Müller-Rommel, Ferdinand, Fettelschoss, Katja, and Harst, Philipp, 2004. “Party Government in Central East European Democracies: A Data Collection (1990–2003),” European Journal of Political Research, 43: 869–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Wolfgang. 2006. “Party Patronage and Party Colonization of the State,” in Richard, Katz, and Crotty, William, eds. Handbook of Party Politic. London: Sage, pp. 189–95.Google Scholar
Müller, Wolfgang. 1992. “Austrian Governmental Institutions: Do They Matter?” in Luther, Kurt Richard, and Müller, Wolfgang, eds. Politics in Austria: Still a Case of Consociationalism? London: Frank Cass, pp. 99–131.Google Scholar
Munck, Gerardo, and Verkuilen, Jay. 2002. “Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: Evaluating Alternative Indices,” Comparative Political Studies, 35, 1: 5–34.Google Scholar
Myerson, Roger. 1993. “Effectiveness of Electoral Systems for Reducing Government Corruption,” Games and Economic Behavior, 5: 118–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nassmacher, Karl-Heinz. 1989. “Structure and Impact of Public Subsidies to Political Parties in Europe,” in Alexander, Herbert, ed. Comparative Political Finance in the 1980s. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 236–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nello, Susan Senior. 2001. “The Role of the IMF,” in Zielonka, Jan, and Pravda, Alex, eds. Democratic Consolidation in Eastern Europe. Vol. 2: International and Transnational Factors. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nørgaard, Ole, Ostrovska, Ilze, and Hansen, Ole Hersted. 2000. “State of the State in Post-Communist Latvia: State Capacity and Government Effectiveness in a Newly Independent Country.” Paper presented at the 2000 European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR) Joint Sessions, Copenhagen.
North, Douglass. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, Douglass. 1981. Structure and Change in Economic History. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
North, Douglass, and Weingast, Barry. 1989. “Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutional Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century England,” Journal of Economic History, 49, 4 (December): 803–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novotný, Vít. 1999. “Deset lat po listopadu: Omězme Moc české Politické Oligarchie,” Britské Listy, 29 November.
Nunberg, Barbara. 2000. “Ready for Europe: Public Administration Reform and European Union Accession in Central and Eastern Europe.” World Bank Technical Paper No. 466. Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar
Nunberg, Barbara, ed. 1999. The State After Communism. Washington: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Dwyer, Conor. 2004. “Runaway State Building: How Political Parties Shape States in Postcommunist Eastern Europe,” World Politics: 520–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Dwyer, Conor. 2003. “Expanding the Post-Communist State? A Theory and Some Empirical Evidence.” Paper presented at the Annual Convention of the American Association for the Advancement of Slavic Studies (AAASS) Toronto, Canada.
O'Dwyer, Conor. 2002. “Civilizing the State Bureaucracy: The Unfulfilled Promise of Public Administration Reform in Poland, Slovakia, and the Czech Republic (1990–2000).” Occasional paper, Berkeley Program in Soviet and Post Soviet Studies.
OECD. 2001a. Issues and Developments in Public Management: Czech Republic–2000.
OECD. 2001b. Issues and Developments in Public Management: Hungry–2000.
Olson, David. 1998. “Party Formation and Party System Consolidation in the New Democracies of Central Europe,” Political Studies, 46, 3: 432–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1993. “Dictatorship, Democracy and Development,” American Political Science Review, 87 (3 September): 567–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neil, Patrick. 1998. Revolution from Within. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
O'Neil, Patrick. 1996. “Revolution from Within: Institutional Analysis, Transitions from Authoritarianisms, and the Case of Hungary,” World Politics, 48, 4 (July): 579–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neil, Patrick. 1993. “Presidential Power in Post-Communist Europe: The Hungarian Case in Comparative Perspective,” Journal of Communist Studies, 9, 3: 177–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orenstein, Mitchell. 2001. Out of the Red: Building Capitalism and Democracy in Postcommunist Europe. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Örkény, Antal, and Scheppele, Kim Lane. 1999. “Rules of Law: The Complexity of Legality in Hungary,” in Krygier, Martin, and Czarnota, Adam, eds. The Rule of Law After Communism. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Ost, David. 1991. “Shaping a New Politics in Poland.” Program on Central and Eastern Europe Working Paper Series, Center for European Studies (CES) Harvard University, No. 8.
Panków, Irena. 1991. “Przemiany środowiska społecznego Polaków w latach osiemdziesiatych,” Kultura i Społeczenstwo, 1: 53–65.Google Scholar
Parlamentní Zpravodaj. 1999. “Jakě jsou klady a zapory aktualního navrhu novely zakona o politických stranach” [What are the bases for the current proposal for the novelization of the law on political parties].
Pempel, T. J. 2000. Regime Shift: Comparative Dynamics of the Japanese Political Economy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Peltzman, Sam. 1998. Political Participation and Government Regulation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Perkins, Doug. 1996. “Structure and Choice: The Role of Organizations, Patronage, and the Media in Party Formation,” Party Politics, 2, 3: 355–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persson, Torsten, Tabellini, , and Guido, . 2002. Political Economics. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Persson, Torsten, Tabellini, Guido, and Trebbi, Francesco. 2001. Electoral Rules and Corruption. Manuscript, June.
Petroff, Włodzimierz. 1996. Finansowanie partii politycznych w postkomunistycznej Europie [The financing of political parties in Europe]. Warsaw: Polish Parliamentary Bureau of Analyses and Expertise.Google Scholar
Pettai, Vello. 1997. “Political Stability Through Disenfranchisement,” Transition, 3, 6 (4 April).Google Scholar
Pettai, Vello, and Kreuzer, Marcus. 2001. “Institutions and Party Development in the Baltic States,” in Lewis, Paul, ed. Party Development and Democratic Change in Post-Communist Europe. London: Frank Cass, pp. 107–25.Google Scholar
PHARE and NVF. 1998. “An Analysis of Public Administration of the Czech Republic.” Summary Report, Prague, September.
Piattoni, Simona. 2001. “Introduction,” in Piattoni, Simona, ed. Clientelism, Interests, and Democratic Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pierre, Jon, Svasand, Lars, and Widfeldt, Anders. 2000. “State Subsidies to Political Parties: Confronting Rhetoric with Reality,” West European Politics, 23, 2 (July): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinto-Duschinsky, Michael. 1985. “How Can Money in Politics Be Assessed?” Paper presented at the International Political Science Conference Paris.
Plakans, Andrejs. 1998. “Democratization and Political Participation in Post-Communist Societies: The Case of Latvia,” in Dawish, Karen, and Parott, Bruce, eds. The Consolidation of Democracy in East-Central Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Plasser, Fritz, Ulram, Peter, and Grausgruber, Alfred. 1992. “The Decline of ‘Lager Mentality’ and the New Model of Electoral Competition in Austria,” in Luther, Kurt Richard, and Müller, Wolfgang, eds. Politics in Austria: Still a Case of Consociationalism? London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Poggi, Gianfranco. 1990. The State: Its Nature, Development, and Prospects. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Powell, Bingham. 2000. Elections as Instruments of Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Protsyk, Oleh. 2003. Reforming Cabinets in Post-Communist Countries: Political Determinants of Cabinet Organization and Size. Manuscript, University of Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1999. “Minimalist Conception of Democracy: A Defense,” in Shapiro, Ian, and Hacker-Cordón, Casiano, eds. Democracy's Value. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 23–55.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1997. “The State in a Market Economy,” in Nelson, Joan, Tilly, Charles, and Walker, Lee, eds. Transforming Post-Communist Political Economies. Washington: National Academy Press, pp. 411–31.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1991. Democracy and Market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1990. The State and the Economy Under Capitalism. London: Harwood Academic.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1995. Sustainable Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pujas, Véronique, and Rhodes, Martin. 1999. “Party Finance and Political Scandal in Italy, Spain, and France,” West European Politics, 22, 3: 41–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raiser, Martin, Di Tommaso, Maria, and Weeks, Melvyn. 2000. “The Measurement and Determinants of Institutional Change: Evidence from Transition Economies.” EBRD Working Paper No. 60.
Reed, Quentin. 2002. “Corruption in Czech Privatization: The Dangers of ‘Neo-Liberal’ Privatization,” in Kotkin, Stephen, and Sajos, Andras, eds. Political Corruption: A Skeptic's Handbook. Budapest: CEU Press, pp. 261–86.Google Scholar
Reed, Quentin. 1996. Political Corruption, Privatization and Control in the Czech Republic. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Oxford University.
Regulski, Jerzy. 1999. “Building Democracy in Poland: The State Reform of 1998.” Discussion Paper 9, Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative. Budapest: Open Society Institute.Google Scholar
Remington, Thomas, and Smith, Steven. 1996. “Institutional Design, Uncertainty, and Path Dependency During Transition,” American Journal of Political Science 40, 4: 1253–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, Eric. 1992. “Public Administration in Post-Socialist Eastern Europe,” Public Administration Review, 52, 2 (March/April): 116–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Bradley. 2001. “Japan's ‘1995 System’ and Beyond,” in Diamond, Larry, and Gunther, Richard, eds. Political Parties and Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, pp. 143–69.Google Scholar
Riker, William. 1982. Liberalism Against Populism. Prospect Heights: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
Riker, William, and Ordeshook, Peter. 1968. “A Theory of the Calculus of Voting,” American Political Science Review, 62: 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, James, and Verdier, Therry. 2002. “The Political Economy of Clientelism.” Centre for Economic Policy Discussion Paper Series No. 3205.
Roland, Gerard. 2001. “Ten Years After … Transition and Economics.” IMF Staff Papers, No. 48. Washington: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
Róna-Tas, Ákos. 1997. The Great Surprise of the Small Transformation. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1999. Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1978. Corruption. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Roubini, Nouriel, and Sachs, Jeffrey. 1989. “Government Spending and Budget Deficits in the Industrial Economies.” NBER Working Papers No. 2919, National Bureau of Economic Research.
Rus, Andrej. 1996. “Quasi Privatization: From Class Struggle to a Scuffle of Small Particularisms,” in Benderly, Jill, and Kraft, Evan, eds. Independent Slovenia: Origins, Movements, Prospects. New York: St. Martin's Press, pp. 225–50.Google Scholar
Rybář, Marek. 2006. “Powered by the State: The Role of Public Resources in Party-Building in Slovakia,” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 22, 3 (September): 320–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rydlewski, Grzegorz. 2000. Rządzenie Koalicyjne w Polsce. Warsaw: Elipsa.Google Scholar
Sadurski, Wojciech, ed. 2002. Constitutional Justice, East and West: Democratic Legitimacy and Constitutional Courts in Post-Communist Europe. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Sajo, Andras. 1998a. “Corruption, Clientelism, and the Future of the Constitutional State in Eastern Europe,” East European Constitutional Review, 7, 2. Available at http://www.law.nyu.edu/eecr/vol7num2.Google Scholar
Sajo, Andras. 1998b. “How the Rule of Law Can Facilitate the Spread of Sleaze,” East European Constitutional Review. 7, 2. Available at http://www.law.ngu.edu/eecr/vol7num 2.Google Scholar
Samuels, David. 2001. “Does Money Matter? Credible Commitments and Campaign Finance in New Democracies,” Comparative Politics, 34, 1 (October): 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1976. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Scarrow, Susan. 2002. “Parties Without Members?” in Dalton, Russell, and Wattenberg, Martin, eds. Parties Without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schamis, Hector E. 2002. Re-Forming the State: The Politics of Privatization in Latin America and Europe. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schavio-Campo, Salvatore, do Tommaso, G., and Mukherjee, A. 1997a. “Government Employment and Pay in Global Perspective.” Washington: World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 1771.
Schavio-Campo, Salvatore, do Tommaso, G., and Mukherjee, A. 1997b. “An International Statistical Survey of Government Employment and Wages.” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 1806.
Scheppele, Kim Lane. 2002. “Democracy by Judiciary.” Paper presented at the conference. Rethinking the Rule of Law in Post-Communist Europa: Past Legacies, Institutional Innovations, and Constitutional Discourses, EUI, Florence, 22–3 February.
Scherpereel, John. 2003. “Appreciating the Third Player: The European Union and the Politics of Civil Service Reform in East Central Europe.” Paper prepared for presentation at the Annual Meeting of American Political Science Association (APSA), Philadelphia, 28–31 August.
Schumpeter, Joseph. 1948. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Scott, James. 1972. Comparative Political Corruption. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Shefter, Martin. 1994. Political Parties and the State: The American Experience. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shleifer, Andrei, and Vishny, Robert W. 1998. The Grabbing Hand: Government Pathologies and Their Cures. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Shleifer, Andrei, and Vishny, Robert W.. 1993. “Corruption,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108: 599–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SIGMA. 2002a. “Bulgaria: Public Service and the Administrative Framework: Assessment 2002.”
SIGMA. 2002b. “Czech Republic: Public Service and the Administrative Framework: Assessment 2002.”
SIGMA 2002c. “Latvia: Public Service and the Administrative Framework: Assessment 2002.”
SIGMA. 2002d. “Slovakia: Public Service and the Administrative Framework: Assessment 2002.”
SIGMA. 1999. Public Management Profiles of Central and East European Countries: Estonia. October.
Sikk, Allan. 2006. “From Private Organizations to Democratic Infrastructure: Political Parties and the State in Estonia,” Journal of Communist Studies and Transitional Politics, 22, 3 (September): 341–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sikk, Allan. 2003. “A Cartel Party System in a Post-Communist Country? The Case of Estonia.” Paper prepared for the European Constitution for Political Review (ECPR) General Conference, 18–21 September, Marborg, Germany.
Sjöblom, Gunnar. 1983. “Political Change and Political Accountability: A Propositional Inventory of Causes and Effects,” in Daalder, Hans, and Peter, Mair, eds. West European Party Systems. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Skach, Cindy, and Stepan, Alfred. 1993. “Constitutional Frameworks and Democratic Consolidation: Parliamentarianism Versus Presidentialism,” World Politics, 46, 1: 1–22.Google Scholar
Slovak Government Information Service. 2000. “Audit súladu činností a financovania ústredných orgánov štátnej správy” [Audit of the activities and finances of the central institutions of public administration]. August. Also available at http://www.vlada.gov.sk/INFOSERVIs/.
Slovak Government Information Service. 1999. “Analysis of the Inherited State of the Economy and Society.”
Smith, David, Pabriks, Artis, Purs, Aldis, and Lane, Thomas. 2002. The Baltic States. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smith, Karen. 2001. “The Promotion of Democracy,” in Zielonka, Jan, and Pravda, Alex, eds. Democratic Consolidation in Eastern Europe. Vol. 2: International and Transnational Factors. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 31–57.Google Scholar
Smithey, Shannon Ishiyama, and Ishiyama, John. 2000. “Judicious Choices: Designing Courts in Post-Communist Politics,” Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 33: 163–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snipe, Arta. 2003. Financing of Political Parites: Effectiveness of Regulation. The Latvian Example. Master's Thesis, Riga Graduate School of Law, Riga, Latvia.
Spar, Deborah. 1994. The Cooperative Edge: The Internal Politics of International Cartels. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Spruyt, Hendrik. 1992. The Sovereign State and Its Competitors. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Staniszkis, Jadwiga. 1999. Post-Socialism. Warsaw: PAN.Google Scholar
Stark, David, and Bruszt, Laszlo. 1998. Postsocialist Pathways. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stein, Jonathan. 1998. “Still in Bed Together.” New Presence (January). Available at http://www.new-presence.in.
Stepan, Alfred. 1994. “Corruption in South America,” in Trang, Due, ed. Corruption and Democracy. Budapest: CEU.Google Scholar
Stigler, George. 1975. The Citizen and the State. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Stigler, George. 1972. “Economic Competition and Political Competition,” Public Choice, 13: 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroehlein, Andrew. 1999. “The Czech Republic 1992 to 1999,” Central Europe Review. (13 September). Available at http://www.ce-review:org.
Strøm, Kaare. 2000. “Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies,” European Journal of Political Research, 37: 261–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strøm, Kaare. 1990. Minority Government and Majority Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strøm, Kaare. 1989. “Inter-Party Competition in Advanced Democracies,” Journal of Theoretical Politics, 1, 3: 277–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suleiman, Ezra N. 2003. Dismantling Democratic States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Swaniewiuz, Pawet. 2004. Consolidation or Fragmentation? Budapest: Open Society Institute.Google Scholar
Szabó, Gábor. 1993. “Administrative Transition in a Post-Communist Society: The Case of Hungary,” Hesse, Joachim Jens, ed. Administrative Transformation in Central and Eastern Europe. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Szczerbak, Aleks. 2006. “State Party Funding and Patronage in Post-1989 Poland,” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 22, 3 (September): 298–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szelenyi, Ivan, and Szelenyi, Sonya. 1991. “The Vacuum in Hungarian Politics: Classes and Parties,” New Left Review (May–June): 121–37.Google Scholar
Szoboszlai, György, 1985a. “Bureaucracy and Social Control,” in Szoboszlai, György, ed. Politics and Public Administration in Hungary. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Szoboszlai, György, ed. 1985b. Politics and Public Administration in Hungary. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Szomolányi, Soňa. 1997. “Identifying Slovakia's Emerging Regime,” in Szomolányi, Soňa, and Gould, John, eds. Slovakia: Problems of Democratic Consolidation. Bratislava: Friedrich Ebert Foundation, pp. 9–34.Google Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney. 1990. “Maintaining Hegemony in Italy: ‘The Softer They Rise, the Slower They Fall,’” in Pempol, T. J ., ed. Uncommon Democracies: The One-Party Dominant Regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp. 306–32.Google Scholar
Terra, Jonathan. 2002. “Political Institutions and Post Communist Transitions.” Paper prepared for the Fourth Annual Society for Comparative Research Graduate Student Retreat, Budapest, May.
Thayer, Nathaniel. 1969. How the Conservatives Rule Japan. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1990. Coercion, Capital, and European States. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tisenkopfs, Tālis, and Kalniņš, Valts. 2002. “Public Accountability Procedures in Politics in Latvia.” Report, Baltic Studies Center, Riga, Latvia, February.
Todorova, Rossitsa. 2001. “EU Integration as an Agent of Public Administration Reform.” Unpublished Manuscript, American University in Bulgaria.
Toonen, Theo. 1993. “Analysing Institutional Change,” in Hesse, Joachim Jens, ed. Administrative Transformation in Central and Eastern Europe. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Torres-Bartyzel, Claudia, and Kacprowicz, Grażyna. 1999. “The National Civil Service System in Poland,” in Verheijen, Tony, ed. Civil Service Systems in Central and Eastern Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 159–83.Google Scholar
Trang, Duc, ed. 1994. Corruption and Democracy. Budapest: CEN Press.Google Scholar
Treisman, Daniel. 2000. “The Causes of Corruption: A Cross-National Study,” Journal of Public Economics, 76: 399–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treisman, Daniel. 1998. “Dollars and Democratization: The Role and Power of Money in Russia's Transitional Elections,” Comparative Politics, 31, 1 (October): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tullock, Gordon. 1967. “The Welfare Costs of Tariffs, Monopolies and Theft,” Western Economic Journal, 5: 224–32.Google Scholar
Turner, Arthur. 1993. “Postauthoritarian Elections: Testing Expectations about ‘First’ Elections,”Comparative Political Studies, 26, 3 (October): 330–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
USAID public opinion poll. 1999. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty broadcast, Slovakia, 10 November.
Úsek pro Reformu Veřejné správy. [Section for the Reform of the Public Administration]. 2001. “Vybrané výstupy z projekty PHARE CZ 9808.01 Posílení institucionálních a administrativních kapacit pro implementaci acquis communautaire.” Prague.
Vachudová, Milada Anna. 2005. Europe Undivided: Democracy, Leverage and Integration After Communism. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, ch. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanagunas, Stan. 1997. “Civil Service Reform in the Baltics.” Paper presented for conference on Civil Service Systems in Comparative Perspective, Indiana University Bloomington, 5–8 April.
Biezen, Ingrid. 2004. “Political Parties as Public Utilities,” Party Politics, 10, 6: 701–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biezen, Ingrid. 2000. “Party Financing in New Democracies,” Party Politics, 6, 3: 329–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biezen, Ingrid, and Kopecký, Petr. 2001. “On the Predominance of State Money: Reassessing Party Financing in the New Democracies of Southern and Eastern Europe,” Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 2, 3: 401–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vass, Lászlo. 1994. “Changes in Hungary's Governmental System,” in Ágh, Attila, ed. The Emergence of West Central European Parliaments: The First Steps. Budapest: Hungarian Center for Democracy Studies, pp. 186–97.Google Scholar
Verheijen, Tony. 2002. “The European Union and Public Administration Development in Central and Eastern Europe,” in Baker, Randall, ed. Transitions from Authoritarianism: The Role of the Bureaucracy. London: Praeger.Google Scholar
Verheijen, Tony. 1999. “The Civil Service of Bulgaria: Hope on the Horizon,” in Verheijen, Tony, ed. Civil Service Systems in Central and Eastern Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 92–130.Google Scholar
Vinton, Lucy. 1993. Poland's New Election Law: Fewer Parties, Same Impasse? RFE/RL Report (8 July): 7–17.Google Scholar
Vládní program boje proti korupci v Česke Republice. [Government program for the fight against corruption in the Czech Republic]. 1998. “Zpráva o korupci v České republice a možnostech účinného postupu proti tomut negativnímu společenskému jevu.” [Report about corruption in the Czech Republic and the possibilities of an active approach against this negative social development], 17 February.
Vreeland, James Raymond. 2003. The IMF and Economic Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walecki, Marcin, ed. 2002. Finansowanie Polityki. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Sejmowe.Google Scholar
Warner, Carolyn. 2001. “Mass Parties and Clientelism: France and Italy,” in Piattoni, Simona, ed. Clientelism, Interests, and Democratic Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 122–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasilewski, Jacek, 2000. “Polish Post-Transitional Elite,” in Frentzel-Zagórska, Janina, and Wasilewski, Jacek, eds. Warsaw: PAN ISP. The Second Generation of Democratic Elites in East and Central Europe.Google Scholar
Waterbury, John. 1973. “Endemic and Planned Corruption in a Monarchical Regime,” World Politics, 25, 4 (July): 533–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Max. 1947. Wirtschaft und Gesellshaft. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
Weingast, Barry. 1997. “The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of Law,” American Political Science Review, 91 (June): 245–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weingast, Barry, and Marshall, William. 1988. “The Industrial Organization of Congress; or, Why Legislatures, Like Firms, Are Not Organized as Markets,” Journal of Political Economy, 96, 1: 132–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winiecki, Jan. 1996. “Impediments to Institutional Change in the Former Soviet System,” in Alston, Lee., eds. Empirical Studies in Institutional Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 63–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittman, Donald. 1995. The Myth of Democratic Failure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
World Bank. 1999. Corruption in Poland: Review of Priority Areas and Proposals for Action. Warsaw: World Bank.
Zemanovičová, Daniela, and Sičáková, xsEmília. 2001. “Transparency and Corruption,” in Mesežnikov, Miroslav, Grigorij, Kollár, and Nicholson, Tom, eds. Slovakia 2001. Bratislava: Institute for Public Affairs, pp. 537–52.Google Scholar
Zielonka, Jan. 1994. “New Institutions in the Old East Bloc,” Journal of Democracy, 5: 87–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Žižmond, Egon. 1993. “Slovenia–One Year of Independence,” Europe-Asia Studies, 45, 5: 887–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckerman, Alan. 1979. The Politics of Faction: Christian Democratic Rule in Italy. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Anna Grzymala-Busse, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Book: Rebuilding Leviathan
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618819.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Anna Grzymala-Busse, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Book: Rebuilding Leviathan
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618819.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Anna Grzymala-Busse, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Book: Rebuilding Leviathan
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511618819.010
Available formats
×