Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 November 2022
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Realism for Realistic PeopleA New Pragmatist Philosophy of Science, pp. 256 - 274Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Ahmad, Zubair, Rahim, Shabina, Zubair, Maha and Abdul-Ghafar, Jamshid. 2021. Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Medicine, Current Applications and Future Role with Special Emphasis on Its Potential and Promise in Pathology. Diagnostic Pathology 16, article 24.Google Scholar
Ankeny, Rachel and Leonelli, Sabina. 2016. Repertoires: A Post-Kuhnian Perspective on Scientific Change and Collaborative Research. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science A60: 18–28.Google Scholar
Arabatzis, Theodore. 2006. Representing Electrons: A Biographical Approach to Theoretical Entities. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert. 2014. Epistemology: A Contemporary Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. [1950] 1979. Truth. In Urmson, J. O. and Warnock, G. J. (eds.), Philosophical Papers, 3rd edn, 117–33. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. [1957] 1979. A Plea for Excuses. In Urmson, J. O. and Warnock, G. J. (eds.), Philosophical Papers, 3rd edn, 175–204. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Auxier, Randall E., Anderson, Douglas R. and Hahn, Lewis Edwin (eds.). The Philosophy of Hilary Putnam. Chicago and La Salle, il: Open Court.Google Scholar
Beck, Lewis White. 1968. The Kantianism of Lewis. In Schilpp, Paul Arthur (ed.), The Philosophy of C. I. Lewis, 271–85. La Salle, il: Open Court.Google Scholar
Berkeley, George. [1709] 1910. A New Theory of Vision and Other Writings. London: J. M. Dent & Sons.Google Scholar
Bermejo, Fernando, Hüg, Mercedes X. and Di Paolo, Ezequiel A. 2020. Rediscovering Richard Held: Activity and Passivity in Perceptual Learning. Frontiers in Psychology, published online 19 May 2020. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00844Google Scholar
Bokulich, Alisa. 2008. Reexamining the Quantum-Classical Relation: Beyond Reductionism and Pluralism. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boon, Mieke. 2015. Contingency and Inevitability in Science: Instruments, Interfaces, and the Independent World. In Soler, Léna et al. (eds.), Science as It Could Have Been: Discussing the Contingency/Inevitability Problem, 151–74. University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Bowdle, Brian F. and Gentner, Dedre. 2005. The Career of Metaphor. Psychological Review 112: 193–216.Google Scholar
Boyd, Richard. 1990. Realism, Approximate Truth, and Philosophical Method. In Savage, C. Wade (ed.), Scientific Theories, 355–91. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, Richard. 1999. Homeostasis, Species, and Higher Taxa. In Wilson, Robert A. (ed.), Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, 141–86. Cambridge, ma: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brading, Katherine and Crull, Elise. 2017. Epistemic Structural Realism and Poincaré’s Philosophy of Science. HOPOS 7: 108–29.Google Scholar
Brading, Katherine and Landry, Elaine. 2006. Scientific Structuralism: Presentation and Representation. Philosophy of Science 73:571–81.Google Scholar
Bradley, Richard. 2017. Decision Theory with a Human Face. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bridgman, Percy Williams. 1940. Science: Public or Private? Philosophy of Science 7/1: 36–48.Google Scholar
Bridgman, Percy Williams. 1955. Reflections of a Physicist. 2nd edn. New York: Philosophical Library.Google Scholar
Bridgman, Percy Williams. 1956. The Present State of Operationalism. In Frank, Philipp (ed.), The Validation of Scientific Theories, 75–83. Boston, ma: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Bridgman, Percy Williams. 1959. The Way Things Are. Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Matthew J. 2013. Values in Science beyond Underdetermination and Inductive Risk. Philosophy of Science 80: 829–39.Google Scholar
Brown, Matthew J. 2020. Science and Moral Imagination. University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Brun, Georg. 2016. Explication as a Method of Conceptual Re-engineering. Erkenntnis 81:1211–41.Google Scholar
Burge, Tyler. 1998. Computer Proof, Apriori Knowledge, and Other Minds: The Sixth Philosophical Perspectives Lecture. Philosophical Perspectives 12: 1–37.Google Scholar
Cao, Tian Yu and Schweber, Silvan S. 1993. The Conceptual Foundations and the Philosophical Aspects of Renormalization Theory. Synthese 97: 33–108.Google Scholar
Cappelen, Herman. 2018. Fixing Language: An Essay on Conceptual Engineering. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Capps, John. 2019. The Pragmatic Theory of Truth. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2019/entries/truth-pragmatic.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf. 1950. Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 4/11: 20–40.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf. 1963. Replies and Systematic Expositions. In Schilpp, Paul Arthur (ed.), The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, 859–1013. La Salle, il: Open Court.Google Scholar
Carrier, Martin. 2013. Values and Objectivity in Science: Value-Ladenness, Pluralism and the Epistemic Attitude. Science & Education 22: 2547–68.Google Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy. 1999. The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy. 2011. A Philosopher’s View of the Long Road from RCTs to Effectiveness. The Lancet 377 (9775): 1400–1.Google Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy. 2019. Nature, the Artful Modeler: Lectures on Laws, Science, How Nature Arranges the World and How We Can Arrange It Better. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
Cartwright, Nancy and Hardie, Jeremy. 2012. Evidence-Based Policy: A Practical Guide to Doing It Better. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. [1910] 1953. Substance and Function & Einstein’s Theory of Relativity. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Chakravartty, Anjan. 2010. Perspectivism, Inconsistent Models, and Contrastive Explanation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 41: 405–12.Google Scholar
Chakravartty, Anjan. 2017. Scientific Ontology: Integrating Naturalized Metaphysics and Voluntarist Epistemology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chalmers, Alan. 2009. The Scientist’s Atom and the Philosopher’s Stone. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Chalmers, Alan. 2013. What Is This Thing Called Science? 4th edn. St Lucia: University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar
Chalmers, David J. 1996. The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chang, Hasok. 2002. Rumford and the Reflection of Radiant Cold: Historical Reflections and Metaphysical Reflexes. Physics in Perspective 4: 127–69.Google Scholar
Chang, Hasok. 2003. Preservative Realism and Its Discontents: Revisiting Caloric. Philosophy of Science 70: 902–12.Google Scholar
Chang, Hasok. 2004. Inventing Temperature: Measurement and Scientific Progress. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chang, Hasok. 2007. Scientific Progress: Beyond Foundationalism and Coherentism. In O’Hear, Anthony (ed.), Philosophy of Science, 1–20. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chang, Hasok. 2008. Contingent Transcendental Arguments for Metaphysical Principles. In Massimi, Michela (ed.), Kant and the Philosophy of Science Today, 113–33. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chang, Hasok. 2009a. Ontological Principles and the Intelligibility of Epistemic Activities. In De Regt, , Leonelli, and Eigner, (eds.), 64–82.Google Scholar
Chang, Hasok. 2009b. Operationalism. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2009/entries/operationalism.Google Scholar
Chang, Hasok. 2011a. The Philosophical Grammar of Scientific Practice. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25: 205–21.Google Scholar
Chang, Hasok. 2011b. Compositionism as a Dominant Way of Knowing in Modern Chemistry. History of Science 49: 247–68.Google Scholar
Chang, Hasok. 2012a. Is Water H2O? Evidence, Realism and Pluralism. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Chang, Hasok. 2012b. Practicing Eighteenth-Century Science Today. In Biagioli, Mario and Riskin, Jessica (eds.), Nature Engaged: Science in Practice from the Renaissance to the Present, 41–58. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Chang, Hasok. 2014. Epistemic Activities and Systems of Practice: Units of Analysis in Philosophy of Science after the Practice Turn. In Soler, et al. (eds.), 67–79.Google Scholar
Chang, Hasok. 2016a. The Rising of Chemical Natural Kinds through Epistemic Iteration. In Kendig, (ed.), 33–46.Google Scholar
Chang, Hasok. 2016b. Pragmatic Realism. Revista de Humanidades de Valparaiso 4: 107–22.Google Scholar
Chang, Hasok. 2017a. Epistemic Iteration and Natural Kinds: Realism and Pluralism in Taxonomy. In Kendler, Kenneth S. and Parnas, Josef (eds.), Philosophical Issues in Psychiatry, vol iv: Classification of Psychiatric Illnesses, 229–45. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chang, Hasok. 2017b. Operational Coherence as the Source of Truth. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 117: 103–22.Google Scholar
Chang, Hasok. 2017c. Operationalism: Old Lessons and New Challenges. In Mößner, Nicola and Nordmann, Alfred (eds.), Reasoning in Measurement, 25–38. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chang, Hasok. 2017d. What History Tells Us about the Distinct Nature of Chemistry. Ambix 64: 360–74.Google Scholar
Chang, Hasok. 2017e. Prospects for an Integrated History and Philosophy of Composition. In Leitgeb, Hannes et al. (eds.), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science – Proceedings of the 15th International Congress, 215–31. London: College Publications.Google Scholar
Chang, Hasok. 2018. Is Pluralism Compatible with Scientific Realism? In Saatsi, (ed.), 176–86.Google Scholar
Chang, Hasok. 2020a. Pragmatism, Perspectivism and the Historicity of Science. In Massimi, and McCoy, (eds.), 10–27.Google Scholar
Chang, Hasok. 2020b. Relativism, Perspectivism and Pluralism. In Kusch, (ed.), 398–406.Google Scholar
Chang, Hasok. 2021. The Coherence of Feyerabend’s Pluralist Realism. In Bschir, Karim and Shaw, Jamie (eds.), Interpreting Feyerabend: Critical Essays, 40–56. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chang, Hasok and Fisher, Grant. 2011. What the Ravens Really Teach Us: The Inherent Contextuality of Evidence. In Twining, William, Dawid, Philip and Vasilaki, Mimi (eds.), Evidence, Inference and Enquiry, 341–66. Oxford University Press and the British Academy.Google Scholar
Chang, Hasok and Leonelli, Sabina. 2005. Infrared Metaphysics: The Elusive Ontology of Radiation (Part 1); Infrared Metaphysics: Radiation and Theory-Choice (Part 2). Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 36: 477–508; 686–705.Google Scholar
Chang, Hasok and Yi, Sang Wook. 2005. The Absolute and Its Measurement: William Thomson on Temperature. Annals of Science 62: 281–308.Google Scholar
Chirimuuta, Mazviita. 2015. Outside Color: Perceptual Science and the Puzzle of Color in Philosophy. Cambridge, ma: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Crombie, Alistair. 1961. Quantification in Medieval Physics. In Woolf, Harry (ed.), Quantification: A History of the Meaning of Measurement in the Natural and Social Sciences, 13–30. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Curiel, Erik. (forthcoming). Why Rigid Designation Cannot Stand on Scientific Ground.Google Scholar
Daly, C. B. 1968. Polanyi and Wittgenstein. In Langford, Thomas A. and Poteat, William H. (eds.), Intellect and Hope: Essays in the Thought of Michael Polanyi, 136–68. Durham, nc: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen. 2006. The Second-Person Standpoint: Morality, Respect, and Accountability. Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
David, Marian. 2016. The Correspondence Theory of Truth. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2016/entries/truth-correspondence.Google Scholar
Dawid, Richard. 2013. String Theory and the Scientific Method. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
De Regt, Henk W. 2017. Understanding Scientific Understanding. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
De Regt, Henk W., Leonelli, Sabina and Eigner, Kai (eds.). 2009. Scientific Understanding: Philosophical Perspectives. University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Debus, Allen G. 1967. Fire Analysis and the Elements in the Sixteenth and the Seventeenth Centuries. Annals of Science 23(2): 127–47.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles and Guattari, Félix. [1980] 1987. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia, trans. Massumi, Brian. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. [1907] 1977. The Intellectual Criterion for Truth. In The Collected Works of John Dewey: The Middle Works, vol. iv, 50–75. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1917. The Need for a Recovery of Philosophy. In John Dewey (ed.), Creative Intelligence: Essays in the Pragmatic Attitude, 3–69. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1929. The Quest for Certainty: A Study of the Relation of Knowledge and Action. New York: Minton, Balch and Co.Google Scholar
Diamond, Cora. 1991. The Realistic Spirit: Wittgenstein, Philosophy, and the Mind. Cambridge, ma: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Douglas, Heather. 2009. Science, Policy and the Value-Free Ideal. University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Douven, Igor. 2021. Abduction. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/abduction.Google Scholar
Dupré, John. 1993. The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science. Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dutilh Novaes, Catarina. 2020. Carnapian Explication and Ameliorative Analysis: A Systematic Comparison. Synthese 197: 1011–34.Google Scholar
Eddington, Arthur S. 1928. The Nature of the Physical World. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Einstein, Albert. 1961. Relativity: The Special and the General Theory, trans. Lawson, Robert W.. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
Einstein, Albert and Infeld, Leopold. 1938. The Evolution of Physics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Brian. 2015. The Ant Trap: Rebuilding the Foundations of the Social Sciences. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Faraday, Michael. 1822. On Some New Electro-Magnetic Motions, and on the Theory of Magnetism. Quarterly Journal of Science, Literature and the Arts 12: 74–96.Google Scholar
Fernflores, Francisco. 2012. The Equivalence of Mass and Energy. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosopy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2012/entries/equivME.Google Scholar
Fine, Arthur. 1984. The Natural Ontological Attitude. In Leplin, Jarrett (ed.), Scientific Realism, 83–107. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Fine, Arthur. 2007. Relativism, Pragmatism, and the Practice of Science. In Misak, (ed.), 50–67.Google Scholar
Floyd, Juliet and Shieh, Sanford (eds.). 2001. Future Pasts: The Analytic Tradition in Twentieth-Century Philosophy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Foley, Richard. 1998. Justification, Epistemic. In Craig, Edward (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 157–65. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Føllesdal, Dagfinn. 1990. The Lebenswelt in Husserl. In Haaparanta, Leila, Kusch, Martin and Niiniluoto, Ilkka (eds.), Language, Knowledge, and Intentionality: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Jaakko Hintikka. Acta Philosophica Fennica 46: 123–43.Google Scholar
Føllesdal, Dagfinn. 2010. The Lebenswelt in Husserl. In Hyder, David and Rheinberger, Hans-Jörg (eds.), Science and the Life-World: Essays on Husserl’s ‘Crisis of European Sciences’, 27–45. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Forman, Paul. 1991. Independence, not Transcendence, for the Historian of Science. Isis 82: 71–86.Google Scholar
Frank, Philipp. 1949. Modern Science and Its Philosophy. Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Galison, Peter. 1997. Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Galison, Peter. 2003. Einstein’s Clocks, Poincaré’s Maps: Empires of Time. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Giere, Ronald N. 2004. How Models Are Used to Represent Reality. Philosophy of Science 71: 742–52.Google Scholar
Giere, Ronald N. 2016. Feyerabend’s Perspectivism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 57: 137–41.Google Scholar
Glanzberg, Michael. 2018a. Truth. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/truth.Google Scholar
Glanzberg, Michael. (ed.). 2018b. The Oxford Handbook of Truth. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldman, Alvin and Beddor, Bob. 2016. Reliabilist Epistemology. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/reliabilism.Google Scholar
Gómez, Juan Carlos. 2004. Apes, Monkeys, Children, and the Growth of Mind. Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gooding, David. 1990. Experiment and the Making of Meaning: Human Agency in Scientific Observation. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Gottwald, Siegfried. 2020. Many-Valued Logic. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2020/entries/logic-manyvalued.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen Jay and Lewontin, Richard C. 1979. The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B205 (1161): 581–98.Google Scholar
Grene, Marjorie. 1974. The Knower and the Known. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Grene, Marjorie. 1987. Historical Realism and Contextual Objectivity: A Developing Perspective in the Philosophy of Science. In Nersessian, Nancy J. (ed.), The Process of Science: Contemporary Philosophical Approaches to Understanding Scientific Practice, 69–81. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Grimm, Stephen R. (ed.). 2018. Making Sense of the World: New Essays on the Philosophy of Understanding. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grimm, Stephen R., Baumberger, Christoph and Ammon, Sabine (eds.). 2017. Explaining Understanding: New Perspectives from Epistemology and Philosophy of Science. New York and Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haack, Susan. 2014. Do Not Block the Way of Inquiry. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 50: 319–39.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. 1989. Extragalactic Reality: The Case of Gravitational Lensing. Philosophy of Science 56: 555–81.Google Scholar
Hardcastle, Gary and Slater, Matthew. 2014. A Novel Exercise for Teaching the Philosophy of Science. Philosophy of Science 81: 1184–96.Google Scholar
Harré, Rom and Llored, Jean-Pierre. 2019. The Analysis of Practices. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Haslanger, Sally. 2000. Gender and Race: (What) Are They? (What) Do We Want Them To Be? Noûs 34: 31–55.Google Scholar
Held, Richard. 1965. Plasticity in Sensory-Motor Systems. Scientific American 213/5: 84–94.Google Scholar
Henne, Céline. 2022. Framed and Framing Inquiry: Development and Defence of John Dewey’s Theory of Knowledge. PhD Dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hentschel, Klaus. 2002. Mapping the Spectrum: Techniques of Visual Representation in Research and Teaching. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hesse, Mary. 1977. Truth and the Growth of Scientific Knowledge. In Suppe, Frederick and Asquith, Peter D. (eds.), PSA 1976, vol. 2 (Symposia), 261–81. East Lansing, mi: Philosophy of Science Association.Google Scholar
Hjortland, Ole Thomassen. 2017. Anti-exceptionalism about Logic. Philosophical Studies 174: 631–58.Google Scholar
Hoefer, Carl and Martí, Genoveva. 2020. Realism, Reference & Perspective. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 10, article 38: 1–22.Google Scholar
Hofmann, August. 1865. On the Combining Power of Atoms. Notices of the Proceedings at the Meetings of the Members of the Royal Institution of Great Britain 4: 401–30.Google Scholar
Holton, Gerald. 1969. Einstein, Michelson, and the ‘Crucial’ Experiment. Isis 60: 133–97.Google Scholar
Hookway, Christopher. 2004. Truth, Reality, and Convergence. In Misak, Cheryl (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Peirce, 127–49. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hornsby, Jennifer. 2004. Agency and Actions. In Hyman, J. and Steward, H. (eds.), Agency and Action, 1–23. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hornsby, Jennifer. 2007. Knowledge and Abilities in Action. In Kanzian, Christian and Runggaldier, Edmund (eds.), Cultures: Conflict – Analysis – Dialogue, 165–80. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag.Google Scholar
Hossenfelder, Sabine. 2018. Lost in Math: How Beauty Leads Physics Astray. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Hoyningen-Huene, Paul. 2013. Systematicity: The Nature of Science. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hoyningen-Huene, Paul and Sankey, Howard (eds.). 2001. Incommensurability and Related Matters. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. [1954] 1970. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. Evanston, il: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Ichikawa, Jonathan Jenkins and Steup, Matthias. 2018. The Analysis of Knowledge. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/knowledge-analysis.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. [1786] 2004. Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science, ed. Friedman, Michael. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kellert, Stephen H., Longino, Helen E. and Waters, C. Kenneth (eds.). 2006. Scientific Pluralism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Kendig, Catherine (ed.). 2016. Natural Kinds and Classification in Scientific Practice. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Khlentzos, Drew. 2021. Challenges to Metaphysical Realism. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/realism-sem-challenge.Google Scholar
Kim, Sung Ho. 2019. Max Weber. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/weber.Google Scholar
Kirkham, R. L. 1992. Theories of Truth: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge, ma: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip. 1993. The Advancement of Science: Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip. 2001. Science, Truth and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip. 2011a. Science in a Democratic Society. Amherst, ny: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip. 2012. Preludes to Pragmatism: Toward a Reconstruction of Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip. (forthcoming). Homo Quaerens: Progress, Truth, and Values.Google Scholar
Kitcher, Philip and Keller, Evelyn Fox. 2017. The Seasons Alter: How to Save Our Planet in Six Acts. New York: Liveright.Google Scholar
Klein, Ursula. 2003. Experiments, Models, Paper Tools: Cultures of Organic Chemistry in the Nineteenth Century. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Knorr Cetina, Karin. 2001. Objectual Practice. In Schatzki, , Knorr Cetina, and von Savigny, (eds.), 186–97.Google Scholar
Kosso, Peter. 1998. Appearance and Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Physics. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. 1957. The Copernican Revolution. Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. [1962] 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd edn. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. [1974] 1977. Second Thoughts on Paradigms. In Kuhn, , The Essential Tension, 293–319. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas S. [1989] 2000. Possible Worlds in History of Science. In Conant, James and Haugeland, John (eds.), The Road Since Structure, 58–89. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kulp, Christopher B. 2009. Dewey, the Spectator Theory of Knowledge, and Internalism/Externalism. The Modern Schoolman 87/1: 67–77.Google Scholar
Kusch, Martin. 2002. Knowledge by Agreement: The Programme of Communitarian Epistemology. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kusch, Martin. (ed.). 2020. The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Relativism. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ladyman, James and Ross, Don, with Spurrett, David, and Collier, John. 2007. Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lakatos, Imre and Musgrave, Alan (eds.). 1970. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George and Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
LaPorte, Joseph. 2018. Rigid Designators. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/rigid-designators.Google Scholar
Laudan, Larry. 1977. Progress and Its Problems. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Laudan, Larry. 1981. A Confutation of Convergent Realism. Philosophy of Science 48: 19–49.Google Scholar
Laudan, Larry. 1984. Science and Values. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lawler, Insa. 2018. Knowing Why – An Investigation of Explanatory Knowledge. PhD dissertation, University of Duisburg–Essen.Google Scholar
Legg, Catherine and Hookway, Christopher. 2021. Pragmatism. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2021/entries/pragmatism.Google Scholar
Lehrer, Keith. 1990. Theory of Knowledge. Boulder, co, and San Francisco, ca: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Lenoir, Timothy. 1992. Practical Reason and the Construction of Knowledge: The Life-world of Haber–Bosch. In McMullin, Ernan (ed.), The Social Dimensions of Science, 158–97. University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Leonelli, Sabina. 2016. Data-Centric Biology: A Philosophical Study. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, Clarence Irving. 1929. Mind and the World-Order: Outline of a Theory of Knowledge. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Lewis, Clarence Irving. 1930. [Review of] The Quest for Certainty: A Study of the Relation of Knowledge and Action [by] John Dewey. Journal of Philosophy 27: 14–25.Google Scholar
Lõhkivi, Endla and Vihalemm, Rein (eds.). 2012. Towards a Practical Realist Account of Science, special issue of Studia Philosophica Estonica 5/2.Google Scholar
Longino, Helen E. 1990. Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Longino, Helen E. (forthcoming). What’s Social about Social Epistemology? Journal of Philosophy.Google Scholar
Losee, John. 1993. A Historical Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. 3rd edn. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, Michael P. 2001. A Functionalist Theory of Truth. In Lynch, Michael P. (ed.), The Nature of Truth: Classical and Contemporary Perspectives, 723–49. Cambridge, ma: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, Timothy D. 2003. Explaining the Success of a Scientific Theory. Philosophy of Science 70: 891–901.Google Scholar
Lyons, Timothy D. 2016a. Scientific Realism. In Humphreys, Paul (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Science, 564–84. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, Timothy D. 2016b. Structural Realism versus Deployment Realism: A Comparative Evaluation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Part A 59: 95–105.Google Scholar
Macarthur, David. 2012. Putnam and the Philosophical Appeal to Common Sense. In Baghramian, (ed.), 127–41.Google Scholar
Mach, Ernst. [1889] 2013. The Science of Mechanics: A Critical and Historical Exposition of Its Principles, trans. McCormack, Thomas J.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mäki, Uskali. 2009. Realistic Realism about Unrealistic Models. In Ross, Don and Kincaid, Harold (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Economics, 68–98. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Massimi, Michela. 2018b. Four Kinds of Perspectival Truth. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 96: 342–59.Google Scholar
Massimi, Michela. 2021. Realism, Perspectivism, and Disagreement in Science. Synthese 198: 6115–41.Google Scholar
Massimi, Michela and McCoy, Casey. (eds.). 2020. Understanding Perspectivism. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Maudlin, Tim. 2015. Confessions of a Hardcore, Unsophisticated Metaphysical Realist. In Auxier, et al. (eds.), 487–501.Google Scholar
Maxwell, Nicholas. 1984. From Knowledge to Wisdom: A Revolution in the Aims and Methods of Science. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mayo, Deborah G. 1996. Error and the Growth of Experimental Knowledge. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McKenzie, Kerry. 2011. Arguing against Fundamentality. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 42: 244–55.Google Scholar
McKenzie, Kerry. 2018. Being Realistic: The Challenge of Theory Change for a Metaphysics of Scientific Realism. Spontaneous Generations 9: 136–42.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Amy. 2009. Peircean Polymorphism: Between Realism and Anti-realism. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 45: 402–21.Google Scholar
McLaughlin, Amy. 2011. In Pursuit of Resistance: Pragmatic Recommendations for Doing Science within One’s Means. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 1: 353–71.Google Scholar
McLeod, Alexus. 2016. Theories of Truth in Chinese Philosophy: A Comparative Approach. London and New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. [1945] 1962. Phenomenology of Perception. London and Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Michaelson, Eliot and Reimer, Marga. 2019. Reference. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2019/entries/reference.Google Scholar
Miller, Alexander. 2016. Realism. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/realism.Google Scholar
Miller, Arthur I. 1981. Albert Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity: Emergence (1905) and Early Interpretation (1905–1911). Reading, ma: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Sandra D. 2003. Biological Complexity and Integrative Pluralism. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Sandra D. 2020. Perspectives, Representation and Integration. In Massimi, and McCoy, , (eds.), 178–93.Google Scholar
Mol, Annemarie. 2002. The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham, nc: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. 1939. Proof of an External World. Proceedings of the British Academy 25: 273–300.Google Scholar
Morgan, Mary S. and Morrison, Margaret (eds.). 1999. Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Murdoch, Dugald. 1987. Niels Bohr’s Philosophy of Physics. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Musgrave, Alan. 1976. Why Did Oxygen Supplant Phlogiston? Research Programmes in the Chemical Revolution. In Howson, Colin (ed.), Method and Appraisal in the Physical Sciences, 181–209. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Neurath, Otto. [1931] 1983. Sociology in the Framework of Physicalism. In Robert S. Cohen and Marie Neurath (eds.), Neurath, , Philosophical Papers 1913–1946, 58–90. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Neurath, Otto. [1932/3] 1983. Protocol Statements. In Robert S. Cohen and Marie Neurath (eds.), Neurath, , Philosophical Papers 1913–1946, 91–9. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Neurath, Otto et al. [1929] 1973. Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung: Der Wiener Kreis (The Scientific Conception of the World: The Vienna Circle). In Marie Neurath and Robert S. Cohen (eds.), Neurath, , Empiricism and Sociology, 299–318. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Niiniluoto, Ilkka. 1999. Critical Scientific Realism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Niiniluoto, Ilkka. 2014. Scientific Realism: Independence, Causation, and Abduction. In Westphal, (ed.), 159–72.Google Scholar
Nye, Mary Jo. 1972. Molecular Reality: A Perspective on the Scientific Work of Jean Perrin. New York: American Elsevier.Google Scholar
Ogilvie, John F. 1990. The Nature of the Chemical Bond 1990: There Are No Such Things as Orbitals! Journal of Chemical Education 67: 280–9.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, Paul and Putnam, Hilary. 1958. Unity of Science as a Working Hypothesis. In Feigl, Herbert, Scriven, Michael and Maxwell, Grover (eds.), Concepts, Theories, and the Mind-Body Problem, 3–36. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Page, Sam. 2006. Mind-Independence Disambiguated: Separating the Meat from the Straw in the Realism/Anti-realism Debate. Ratio 19/3: 321–35.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding and Lynch, Michael P. 2018. Truth Pluralism. In Glanzberg, (ed.), 543–78.Google Scholar
Pedersen, Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding and Wright, Cory. 2018. Pluralist Theories of Truth. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/truth-pluralist.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1877. The Fixation of Belief. Popular Science Monthly 12/1: 1–15.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1878. How to Make Our Ideas Clear. Popular Science Monthly 12/3: 286–302.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1934. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol. v. Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1986. Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A Chronological Edition, vol. iii. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Peters, Dean. 2012. How to Be a Scientific Realist (If At All): A Study of Partial Realism. PhD dissertation, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
Piaget, Jean. [1937] 1954. The Construction of Reality in the Child. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Pickering, Andrew. 2015. Science, Contingency, and Ontology. In Soler, Léna et al. (eds.), Science as It Could Have Been: Discussing the Contingency/Inevitability Problem, 117–28. University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Pihlström, Sami. 2003. Naturalizing the Transcendental: A Pragmatic View. Amherst, ny: Prometheus.Google Scholar
Pihlström, Sami. 2009. Pragmatist Metaphysics: An Essay on the Ethical Grounds of Ontology. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Pihlström, Sami. 2011. The Problem of Realism, from a Pragmatic Point of View. In Frega, (ed.), 103–26.Google Scholar
Pihlström, Sami. 2012. Toward Pragmatically Naturalized Transcendental Philosophy of Scientific Inquiry and Pragmatic Scientific Realism. Studia Philosophica Estonica 5/2: 79–94.Google Scholar
Pirsig, Robert M. 1974. Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Michael. 1958. Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-critical Philosophy. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Price, Huw. 1998. Three Norms of Assertibility, or How the Moa became Extinct. Philosophical Perspectives 12: 241–54.Google Scholar
Priest, Graham. 2008. An Introduction to Non-classical Logic: From If to Is. 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pritchard, Duncan. 2016. Seeing It for Oneself: Perceptual Knowledge, Understanding, and Intellectual Autonomy. Episteme 13/1: 29–42.Google Scholar
Privat-Deschanel, Agustin. 1876. Elementary Treatise on Natural Philosophy, trans. and ed. Everett, J. D.. London: Blackie & Son.Google Scholar
Psillos, Stathis. 1999. Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1975a. Philosophical Papers, vol. i: Mathematics, Matter and Method. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1977. Realism and Reason. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 50/6: 483–98.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1980a. How to Be an Internal Realist and a Transcendental Idealist (at the Same Time). In Haller, R. and Grassl, W. (eds.), Language, Logic, and Philosophy, 100–8. Vienna: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1987. The Many Faces of Realism (The Paul Carus Lectures). Chicago and La Salle, il: Open Court.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1990a. Realism with a Human Face, ed. Conant, James. Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1999. The Threefold Cord: Mind, Body and World. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 1969. Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Radder, Hans. 2006. The World Observed / The World Conceived. University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Raskin, Marcus G. and Bernstein, Herbert J. 1987. New Ways of Knowing: The Sciences, Society and Reconstructive Knowledge. Totowa, nj: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Nicolas. 1993. Facts, Artifacts, and Mesosomes: Practicing Epistemology with the Electron Microscope. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 24: 227–65.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans. [1920] 1965. The Theory of Relativity and A Priori Knowledge. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Resnick, David. 1994. Hacking’s Experimental Realism. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 24: 395–412.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1982. Consequences of Pragmatism: Essays 1972–1980. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, Sandra B. 2007. C. I. Lewis in Focus: The Pulse of Pragmatism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Rouse, Joseph. 1987. Knowledge and Power: Toward a Political Philosophy of Science. Ithaca, ny: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Rouse, Joseph. 2001. Two Concepts of Practices. In Schatzki, , Knorr Cetina, and von Savigny, (eds.), 198–208.Google Scholar
Rouse, Joseph. 2015. Articulating the World: Conceptual Understanding and the Scientific Image. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rowbottom, Darrell P. 2019. The Instrument of Science: Scientific Anti-realism Revitalized. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ruphy, Stéphanie. 2016. Scientific Pluralism Reconsidered: A New Approach to the (Dis)Unity of Science. University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand. 1910. William James’s Conception of Truth. In Russell, , Philosophical Essays, 127–49. London: Longmans, Green.Google Scholar
Ruthenberg, Klaus and Chang, Hasok. 2020. Glass and Life: The Biochemical Origins of pH. Beitrag für die Mitteilungen der Fachgruppe Geschichte der Chemie 26: 63–87.Google Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert. 1946. Knowing How and Knowing That: The Presidential Address. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, new series 46: 1–16.Google Scholar
Saatsi, Juha (ed.). 2018. The Routledge Handbook of Scientific Realism. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Scerri, Eric. 2007. The Periodic Table: Its Story and Its Significance. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scharp, Kevin. 2021. Conceptual Engineering for Truth: Alethetic Properties and New Alethetic Concepts. Synthese 198: 647–88.Google Scholar
Schatzki, Theodore R. 2001a. Introduction: Practice Theory. In Schatzki, , Knorr Cetina, and von Savigny, (eds.), 10–23.Google Scholar
Schatzki, Theodore R. 2001b. Practice Mind-ed Orders. In Schatzki, , Knorr Cetina, and von Savigny, (eds.), 50–63.Google Scholar
Schatzki, Theodore R., Knorr Cetina, Karin and von Savigny, Eike (eds.). 2001. The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Scheffler, Israel. 1999. A Plea for Pluralism. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 35: 425–36.Google Scholar
Schiller, Ferdinand Canning Scott. 1939. Our Human Truths. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Schilpp, Paul Arthur (ed.). 1968. The Philosophy of C. I. Lewis. La Salle, il: Open Court.Google Scholar
Schweikard, David P. and Schmid, Hans Bernhard. 2021. Collective Intentionality. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/collective-intentionality.Google Scholar
Šešelja, Dunja, Kosolosky, Laszlo and Straßer, Christian. 2012. The Rationality of Scientific Reasoning in the Context of Pursuit: Drawing Appropriate Distinctions. Philosophica 86: 51–82.Google Scholar
Šešelja, Dunja and Straßer, Christian. 2014. Epistemic Justification in the Context of Pursuit: A Coherentist Approach. Synthese 191: 3111–41.Google Scholar
Shan, Yafeng. 2019. A New Functional Approach to Scientific Progress. Philosophy of Science 104: 639–59.Google Scholar
Shang, Rick. 2021. Positron Emission Tomography from 1930 to 1990. PhD dissertation, Washington University.Google Scholar
Shapere, Dudley. 1993. Discussion: Astronomy and Anti-Realism. Philosophy of Science 60: 134–50.Google Scholar
Shipley, Joseph T. 1984. The Origins of English Words: A Discursive Dictionary of Indo-European Roots. Baltimore, md: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Skulberg, Emilie. 2021. The Event Horizon as a Vanishing Point. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Snowdon, Paul. 2004. The Presidential Address. Knowing How and Knowing That: A Distinction Reconsidered. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, new series 104: 1–32.Google Scholar
Soler, Léna. 2012. Robustness of Results and Robustness of Derivations: The Internal Architecture of a Solid Experimental Proof. In Léna Soler, Emiliano Trizio, Thomas Nickles and William C. Wimsatt (eds.), The Robustness of Science, 227–66. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Soler, Léna and Catinaud, Régis. 2014. Toward a Framework for the Analysis of Scientific Practices. In Soler, et al. (eds.), 80–92.Google Scholar
Soler, Léna, Zwart, Sjoerd, Lynch, Michael and Israel-Jost, Vincent (eds.). 2014. Science after the Practice Turn in the Philosophy, History and Social Studies of Science. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Spiegelberg, Herbert. 1956. Husserl and Peirce’s Phenomenologies: Coincidence or Interaction. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 17: 164–85.Google Scholar
Staley, Richard. 2008. Einstein’s Generation: The Origins of the Relativity Revolution. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Stanford, P. Kyle. 2018. Unconceived Alternatives and the Strategy of Historical Ostension. In Saatsi, (ed.), 212–24.Google Scholar
Stanford, P. Kyle and Kitcher, Philip. 2000. Refining the Causal Theory of Reference for Natural Kind Terms. Philosophical Studies 97: 99–129.Google Scholar
Stang, Nicholas F. 2018. Kant’s Transcendental Idealism. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/kant-transcendental-idealism.Google Scholar
Stanley, Jason and Williamson, Timothy. 2001. Knowing How. Journal of Philosophy 98: 411–44.Google Scholar
Steinhoff, Gordon. 1986. Internal Realism, Truth and Understanding. In Fine, Arthur and Machamer, Peter (eds.), PSA 1986, vol. i, 352–63. East Lansing, mi: Philosophy of Science Association.Google Scholar
Steinle, Friedrich. 2016. Exploratory Experiments: Ampère, Faraday, and the Origins of Electrodynamics. University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Stern, David G. 2003. The Practical Turn. In Turner, Stephen P. and Roth, Paul A. (eds.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 185–206. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stoljar, Daniel and Damnjanovic, Nic. 2014. The Deflationary Theory of Truth. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/truth-deflationary.Google Scholar
Stuart, Michael T. 2018. How Thought Experiments Increase Understanding. In Stuart, , Fehige, and Brown, (eds.), 526–44.Google Scholar
Stuart, Michael T., Fehige, Yiftach and Brown, James Robert (eds.). 2018. The Routledge Companion to Thought Experiments. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stump, David J. 2015. Conceptual Change and the Philosophy of Science: Alternative Interpretations of the A Priori. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Suárez, Mauricio. 2004. An Inferential Conception of Scientific Representation. Philosophy of Science 71: 767–79.Google Scholar
Suárez, Mauricio. 2016. Representation in Science. In Humphreys, Paul (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Science, 440–59. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swoyer, Chris. 1991. Structural Representation and Surrogative Reasoning. Synthese 87: 449–508.Google Scholar
Teller, Paul. 2018. Referential and Prespectival Realism. Spontaneous Generations 9/1: 151–64.Google Scholar
Teller, Paul. 2020. What Is Perspectivism, and Does It Count as Realism? In Massimi, and McCoy, (eds.), 49–64.Google Scholar
Thompson, Michael. 2008. Life and Action: Elementary Structures of Practice and Practical Thought. Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tomczyk, Hannah. 2022. Did Einstein Predict Bose–Einstein Condensation? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 93: 30–8.Google Scholar
Toon, Adam. 2012. Models as Make-Believe: Imagination, Fiction and Scientific Representation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Torretti, Roberto. 2000. ‘Scientific Realism’ and Scientific Practice. In Agazzi, Evandro and Pauri, Massimo (eds.), The Reality of the Unobservable, 113–22. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Van Fraassen, Bas. 2004. Précis of The Empirical Stance. Philosophical Studies 121: 127–32.Google Scholar
Van Fraassen, Bas. 2008. Scientific Representation: Paradoxes of Perspective. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vickers, Peter. 2017. Understanding the Selective Realist Defence against the PMI. Synthese 194: 3221–32.Google Scholar
Vihalemm, Rein. 2012. Practical Realism: Against Standard Scientific Realism and Anti-realism. Studia Philosophica Estonica 5/2: 7–22.Google Scholar
Watkins, Calvert (ed.). 1985. The American Heritage Dictionary of Indo-European Roots. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Westerblad, Oscar. (forthcoming). Making Sense of Understanding: A Pragmatist Account of Scientific Understanding. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth (ed.). 2014. Realism, Science and Pragmatism. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wheaton, Bruce R. 1983. The Tiger and the Shark: Empirical Roots of Wave–Particle Dualism. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Mark. 2006. Wandering Significance: An Essay on Conceptual Behaviour. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, William C. 2007. Re-engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings: Piecewise Approximations to Reality. Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1922. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Woodward, James. (forthcoming). Sketch of Some Themes for a Pragmatist Philosophy of Science. In Andersen, Holly and Mitchell, Sandra (eds.), The Pragmatist Challenge. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Worrall, John. 1989. Structural Realism: The Best of Both Worlds? Dialectica 43: 99–124.Google Scholar
Wright, Crispin. 1992. Truth and Objectivity. Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Crispin. 1999. Truth: A Traditional Debate Reviewed. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 24: 31–74.Google Scholar
Young, James O. 2015. The Coherence Theory of Truth. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2015/entries/truth-coherence.Google Scholar
Zambito, Pascal. 2019. ‘Logic is a geometry of thinking’: Space and Spatial Frameworks in Wittgenstein’s Writings. PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar