Part IV - (Mis)Understandings
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 11 December 2019
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Reading American Indian LawFoundational Principles, pp. 307 - 402Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Further Reading
Berger, Bethany R., Indian Policy and the Imagined Indian Woman, 14 Kan. J.L. & Pub. Pol’y 103 (2004).Google Scholar
Cahn, Naomi, Family Law, Federalism, and the Federal Courts, 79 Iowa L. Rev. 1073 (1994).Google Scholar
Fletcher, Matthew L. M., Resisting Federal Courts on Tribal Jurisdiction, 81 U. Colo. L. Rev. 973 (2010).Google Scholar
Fletcher, Matthew L. M., The Supreme Court’s Indian Problem, 59 Hastings L.J. 579 (2008).Google Scholar
Gover, Kevin & Laurence, Robert, Avoiding Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez: The Litigation in Federal Court of Civil Actions under the Indian Civil Rights Act, 8 Hamline L. Rev. 497 (1985).Google Scholar
Jones, B.J., Welcoming Tribal Courts into the Judicial Fraternity: Emerging Issues in Tribal–State and Tribal–Federal Court Relations, 24 Wm. Mitchell L. Rev. 457 (1998).Google Scholar
Koehn, Melissa L., Civil Jurisdiction: The Boundaries between Federal and Tribal Courts, 29 Ariz. St. L.J. 705 (1997).Google Scholar
Laurence, Robert, A Quincentennial Essay on Martinez v. Santa Clara Pueblo, 28 Idaho L. Rev. 307 (1992).Google Scholar
Levinson, Sanford, On Political Boundary Lines, Multiculturalism, and the Liberal State, 72 Ind. L.J. 403 (1997).Google Scholar
Lawson, Gary, Territorial Governments and the Limits of Formalism, 78 Calif. L. Rev. 853 (1990).Google Scholar
Royster, Judith V., Stature and Scrutiny: Post-Exhaustion Review of Tribal Court Decisions, 46 Kan. L. Rev. 241 (1998).Google Scholar
Valencia-Weber, Gloria, Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez: Twenty-Five Years of Disparate Cultural Visions: An Essay Introducing the Case for Re-argument before the American Indian Nations Supreme Court, 14 Kan. J.L. & Pub. Pol’y 49 (2004).Google Scholar
Further Reading
Collins, Richard B., Indian Consent to American Government, 31 Ariz. L. Rev. 365 (1989).Google Scholar
Davis, Seth, American Colonialism and Constitutional Redemption, 105 Calif. L. Rev. 1751 (2017).Google Scholar
Fredericks, Carla F. & Heibel, Jesse D., Standing Rock, the Sioux Treaties, and the Limits of the Supremacy Clause, 89 U. Colo. L. Rev. 477 (2018).Google Scholar
Newton, Nell Jessup, Federal Power over Indians: Its Sources, Scope, and Limitations, 132 U. Penn. L. Rev. 195 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, Robert Odawi, The Inapplicability of American Law to the Indian Nations, 89 Iowa L. Rev. 1595 (2004).Google Scholar
Saito, Natsu Taylor, The Plenary Power Doctrine: Subverting Human Rights in the Name of Sovereignty, 51 Cath. U.L. Rev. 1115 (2002).Google Scholar
Skibine, Alex Tallchief, Formalism and Judicial Supremacy in Federal Indian Law, 32 Am. Indian L. Rev. 391 (2008).Google Scholar
Skibine, Alex Tallchief, Constitutionalism, Federal Common Law, and the Inherent Powers of Indian Tribes, 39 Am. Indian L. Rev. 77 (2015).Google Scholar
Williams, Robert A. Jr., Like a Loaded Weapon: The Rehnquist Court, Indian Rights, and the Legal History of Racism in America (University of Minnesota Press 2005).Google Scholar
Further Reading
Creel, Barbara, The Right to Counsel for Indians Accused of a Crime: A Tribal and Congressional Imperative, 18 Mich. J. Race & L. 317 (2013).Google Scholar
Ennis, Samuel, Reaffirming Indian Tribal Court Criminal Jurisdiction over Non-Indians: An Argument for a Statutory Abrogation of Oliphant, 57 UCLA L. Rev. 553 (2009).Google Scholar
Kronk, Elizabeth, The Emerging Problem of Methamphetamine: A Threat Signaling the Need to Reform Criminal Jurisdiction in Indian Country, 82 N.D. L. Rev. 1249 (2006).Google Scholar
Lewis, Brian L., Do You Know What You Are? You Are What You Is; You Is What You Am: Indian Status for the Purpose of Federal Criminal Jurisdiction and the Current Split in the Courts of Appeals, 26 Harv. J. Racial & Ethnic Just. 241 (2010).Google Scholar
Monette, Richard, Indian Country Jurisdiction and the Assimilative Crimes Act, 69 Or. L. Rev. 269 (1990).Google Scholar
Resnik, Judith, Tribes, Wars, and the Federal Courts: Applying the Myths and the Methods of Marbury v. Madison to Tribal Courts’ Criminal Jurisdiction, 36 Ariz. St. L.J. 77 (2005).Google Scholar
Schiffler, Molly, Women of Color and Crime: A Critical Race Theory Perspective to Address Disparate Prosecution, 56 Ariz. L. Rev. 1203 (2014).Google Scholar
Washburn, Kevin, Federal Criminal Law and Tribal Self-Determination, 84 N.C. L. Rev. 779 (2006).Google Scholar
Further Reading
Christensen, Grant, Judging Indian Law: What Factors Influence Individual Justice’s Votes on Indian Law in the Modern Era, 43 U. Tol. L. Rev. 267 (2012).Google Scholar
Epps, Daniel & Ortman, William, The Lottery Docket, 116 Mich. L. Rev. 705 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, Adam & Kappner, Alexander, Finding Certainty in Cert: An Empirical Analysis of the Factors Involved in Supreme Court Certiorari Decisions from 2001–2005, 61 Vill. L. Rev. 795 (2016).Google Scholar
Fletcher, Matthew L. M., The Supreme Court’s Indian Problem, 59 Hastings L.J. 579 (2008).Google Scholar
Grant, Emily, Hendrickson, Scott A., and Lynch, Michael S., The Ideological Divide: Conflict and the Supreme Court’s Certiorari Decision, 60 Cle. St. L. Rev. 559 (2012).Google Scholar
Hermann, John R., American Indian Interests and Supreme Court Agenda Setting: 1969–1992 October Terms, 25 Am. Pol. Q. 241 (1997).Google Scholar
Hermann, John R. & O’Connor, Karen, American Indians and the Burger Court, 77 Soc. Sci. Q. 127 (1996).Google Scholar
Kramer, Karl J., Comment, The Most Dangerous Branch: An Institutional Approach to Understanding the Role of the Judiciary in American Indian Jurisdictional Determinations, 1986 Wis. L. Rev. 989 (1986).Google Scholar
O’Brien, David M., Join-3 Votes, the Rule of Four, the Cert. Pool, and the Supreme Court’s Shrinking Plenary Docket, 13 J.L. & Politics 779 (1997).Google Scholar
Palmer, Barbara, The “Bermuda Triangle?” The Cert Pool and Its Influence over the Supreme Court’s Agenda, 18 Const. Commentary 105 (2006).Google Scholar
Riley, Angela, The History of Native American Lands and the Supreme Court, 38 J. Sup. Ct. Hist. 369 (2013).Google Scholar
Skibine, Alexander Tallchief, The Supreme Court’s Last 30 Years of Federal Indian Law: Looking for Equilibrium or Supremacy?, 8 Colum. J. Race & L. 22 (2018).Google Scholar