Introduction

Jon Mandle

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511814099.002

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012

Jon Mandle

Show author details

Jon Mandle: Affiliation:
State University of New York, Albany

Book contents

Get access

Summary

“The smarter you get, the smarter it gets.”

(Hilary Putnam on A Theory of Justice)

In 1971 the philosophical world was waiting both literally and metaphorically for A Theory of Justice. Many philosophers eagerly anticipated it because John Rawls had already published key elements of his theory in a series of articles, and for several years he had circulated drafts of sections of the book. Just a year after its publication, one author began his review by stating that “Rawls' theory of justice is too well-known to need detailed exposition.” Metaphorically, the field of political philosophy was waiting for it because, in the words of Isaiah Berlin in 1964, “no commanding work of political philosophy has appeared in the twentieth century.” The field was looking for such a work in order to escape from what was widely believed to be its very poor condition. Perhaps the most dramatic expression of this despondent state was Peter Laslett's declaration, in the introduction to his 1956 collection Philosophy, Politics and Society, that “For the moment, anyway, political philosophy is dead.” This certainly overstated the case, but his identification of “the culprit” revealed clearly what he thought had gone wrong in the field: “The Logical Positivists did it.”

The work of T. D. Weldon was characteristic of this approach. In an article included in Laslett's 1956 collection, Weldon declared that “The purpose of philosophy…is to expose and elucidate linguistic muddles; it has done its job when it has revealed the confusions which have occurred and are likely to recur in inquiries into matters of fact because the structure and the use of language are what they are.”

Type: Chapter
Information: Rawls's 'A Theory of Justice'
An Introduction
, pp. 1 - 34

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511814099.002 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Parekh, B., “Reflections on Rawls's Theory of Justice,” Political Studies, 20 (1972), p. 478Google Scholar

Berlin, Isaiah, “Does Political Theory Still Exist?” in Philosophy, Politics and Society (second series), Laslett, Peter and Runciman, W. G., eds. (Blackwell, 1964), p. 1Google Scholar

Laslett, Peter, “Introduction” in Philosophy, Politics and Society, Laslett, Peter, ed. (Blackwell, 1956), p. viiGoogle Scholar

Partridge, P. H., “Politics, Philosophy, Ideology,” Political Studies, 9 (1961)CrossRef Google Scholar

Barry, Brian, “Political Argument after Twenty-Five Years: An Introduction to the Reissue” in Political Argument: A Reissue with a New Introduction (University of California Press, 1990)Google Scholar

Hart, H. L. A., “Between Utility and Rights” [1979] in Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy (Oxford University Press, 1983), p. 198Google Scholar

“The Good of Justice as Fairness,” Times Literary Supplement, May 5, 1972, p. 505

Cohen, Marshall, “Review of A Theory of Justice,” New York Times Book Review, July 16, 1972, p. 18Google Scholar

“John Rawls: Liberal Democracy Restated” in Liberal Democracy and its Critics, Carter, April and Stokes, Geoffrey, eds. (Polity, 1998), p. 118

Nozick, Robert, Anarchy, State, and Utopia (Basic Books, 1974), p. 183Google Scholar

Pogge, Thomas, John Rawls: His Life and Theory of Justice (Oxford University Press, 2007)CrossRef Google Scholar

Freeman, Samuel, Rawls (Routledge, 2007)Google Scholar

Rawls, John, A Brief Inquiry into the Meaning of Sin and Faith: With “On My Religion,”Nagel, Thomas, ed. (Harvard University Press, 2009)CrossRef Google Scholar

Gregory, Eric, “Before the Original Position: The Neo-Orthodox Theology of the Young John Rawls,” Journal of Religious Ethics, 35 (2007)CrossRef Google Scholar

Collected Papers, Freeman, Samuel, ed. (Harvard University Press, 1999)

“John Rawls: For the Record,” The Harvard Review of Philosophy (Spring, 1991), p. 39

Rawls, John, Political Liberalism, expanded edn. (Columbia University Press, 2005)Google Scholar

Freeman, , Collected Papers; The Law of Peoples (Harvard University Press, 1999)Google Scholar

Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy, Herman, Barbara, ed. (Harvard University Press, 2000)

Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, Kelly, Erin, ed. (Harvard University Press, 2001)

Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy, Freeman, Samuel, ed. (Harvard University Press, 2007)

Samuelson, Robert, “Faculty Shelves Draft Resolution after Debating for Hour and Half,” The Harvard Crimson, January 11, 1967Google Scholar

“Symposium on the Reception of Rawls in Europe” in the European Journal of Political Theory, 1 (2002)

“John Rawls,” The Harvard Review of Philosophy, 11 (2003), p. 7CrossRef

“Rawls is Given Two Awards for Book on Justice Theory,” The Harvard Crimson, December 7, 1972

Cohen, Joshua, “The Importance of Philosophy: Reflections on John Rawls,” South African Journal of Philosophy, 32 (2004), p. 118Google Scholar

Posner, Richard, The Problematics of Moral and Legal Theory (Harvard University Press, 1999), p. ixGoogle Scholar

Rorty, Richard, “Human Rights, Rationality, and Sentimentality” [1993] in Truth and Progress: Philosophical Papers, vol. III (Cambridge University Press, 1998), p. 176Google Scholar

Rawls, John, “Afterword: A Reminiscence” in Future Pasts: The Analytic Tradition in Twentieth-Century Philosophy, Floyd, Juliet and Shieh, Sanford, eds. (Oxford University Press, 2001), pp. 427–8Google Scholar

Schwartz, Adina, “Moral Neutrality and Primary Goods,” Ethics, 83 (1973), p. 297CrossRef Google Scholar

Elster, Jon, Local Justice: How Institutions Allocate Scarce Goods and Necessary Burdens (Russell Sage Foundation, 1992), p. 227Google Scholar

Harsanyi, John, “Can the Maximin Principle Serve as a Basis for Morality? A Critique of John Rawls's Theory” [1975] in Essays on Ethics, Social Behavior, and Scientific Explanation (D. Reidel, 1976)Google Scholar

Kukathas, Chandran and Pettit, Philip, Rawls: “A Theory of Justice” and its Critics (Stanford University Press, 1990), p. 142Google Scholar

Ackerman, Bruce, “Political Liberalisms,” The Journal of Philosophy, 91 (1994), pp. 371, 374CrossRef Google Scholar

Williams, Bernard, “A Fair State,” London Review of Books, May 13, 1993, p. 8Google Scholar

Nagel, Thomas, “Rawls and Liberalism” in The Cambridge Companion to Rawls, Freeman, Samuel, ed. (Cambridge University Press, 2003), p. 71Google Scholar

Anderson, Elizabeth, “What is the Point of Equality?” Ethics, 109 (1999)CrossRef Google Scholar

Scheffler, Samuel, “What is Egalitarianism?” Philosophy and Public Affairs, 31 (2003)CrossRef Google Scholar

Freeman, Samuel, “Rawls and Luck Egalitarianism” in Justice and the Social Contract: Essays on Rawlsian Political Philosophy (Oxford University Press, 2007)Google Scholar

Sandel, Michael, Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, second edn. (Cambridge University Press, 1998), p. 139CrossRef Google Scholar

“Justice, Desert, and Ideal Theory,” Social Theory and Practice, 23 (1997)

Galston, William, Liberal Purposes: Goods, Virtues, and Diversity in the Liberal State (Cambridge University Press, 1991), p. 162CrossRef Google Scholar

Schaller, Walter, “Rawls, the Difference Principle, and Economic Inequality,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 79 (1998)CrossRef Google Scholar

Book contents

Introduction

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive