Book contents
- Radical Conduct
- Radical Conduct
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures and Tables
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 Politics and Privacy
- 2 Disagreement and Deliberation
- 3 Plurality
- 4 Radical Literary Women
- 5 Gender and Deliberative Equality
- 6 Negotiating Equality
- 7 A Private Affair
- 8 Music and Movement
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
5 - Gender and Deliberative Equality
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 August 2020
- Radical Conduct
- Radical Conduct
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures and Tables
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 Politics and Privacy
- 2 Disagreement and Deliberation
- 3 Plurality
- 4 Radical Literary Women
- 5 Gender and Deliberative Equality
- 6 Negotiating Equality
- 7 A Private Affair
- 8 Music and Movement
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
The deliberative style of radicals around Godwin and Holcroft was driven by a belief in truth and candour and it was one which was especially prized in its binary form, in contrast to the tendency of public meetings and political associations to fall back on rhetoric. It was a discourse that insisted on deliberative equality, but did so in a powerfully hierarchical society, divided on lines of class, status and gender.Godwin and others were often successful in drawing young men into their circles and engaging in this deliberative practice; but it was much more challenging to do so with women.This chapter examines how a number of women sought to resist and negotiate Godwin’s deliberative dominance using a range of strategies to discomfit him, to challenge his intellectualism and to claim a position of equality.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Radical ConductPolitics, Sociability and Equality in London 1789-1815, pp. 155 - 169Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020