Book contents
- Quantum Worlds
- Quantum Worlds
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- Part I Ontology from Different Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics
- 1 Ontology for Relativistic Collapse Theories
- 2 The Modal-Hamiltonian Interpretation: Measurement, Invariance, and Ontology
- 3 Quantum Mechanics and Perspectivalism
- 4 Quantum Physics Grounded on Bohmian Mechanics
- 5 Ontology of the Wave Function and the Many-Worlds Interpretation
- 6 Generalized Contexts for Quantum Histories
- Part II Realism, Wave Function, and Primitive Ontology
- Part III Individuality, Distinguishability, and Locality
- Part IV Symmetries and Structure in Quantum Mechanics
- Part V The Relationship between the Quantum Ontology and the Classical World
- Index
- References
3 - Quantum Mechanics and Perspectivalism
from Part I - Ontology from Different Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 April 2019
By
Book contents
- Quantum Worlds
- Quantum Worlds
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- Part I Ontology from Different Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics
- 1 Ontology for Relativistic Collapse Theories
- 2 The Modal-Hamiltonian Interpretation: Measurement, Invariance, and Ontology
- 3 Quantum Mechanics and Perspectivalism
- 4 Quantum Physics Grounded on Bohmian Mechanics
- 5 Ontology of the Wave Function and the Many-Worlds Interpretation
- 6 Generalized Contexts for Quantum Histories
- Part II Realism, Wave Function, and Primitive Ontology
- Part III Individuality, Distinguishability, and Locality
- Part IV Symmetries and Structure in Quantum Mechanics
- Part V The Relationship between the Quantum Ontology and the Classical World
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Quantum WorldsPerspectives on the Ontology of Quantum Mechanics, pp. 51 - 70Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Araújo, M. (2016). “If your interpretation of quantum mechanics has a single world but no collapse, you have a problem,” http://mateusaraujo.info/2016/06/20/if-your-interpretation-of-quantum-mechanics-has-a-single-world-but-no-collapse-you-have-a-problem/Google Scholar
Bacciagaluppi, G. (2002). “Remarks on space-time and locality in Everett’s interpretation,” pp. 105–122 in Placek, T. and Butterfield, J. (eds.), Non-Locality and Modality. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Bene, G. and Dieks, D. (2002). “A perspectival version of the modal interpretation of quantum mechanics and the origin of macroscopic behavior,” Foundations of Physics, 32: 645–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berndl, K., Dür, D., Goldstein, S., and Zanghì, N. (1996). “Nonlocality, Lorentz invariance, and Bohmian quantum theory,” Physical Review A, 53: 2062–2073.Google Scholar
Bohm, D. (1952). “A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of ‘hidden’ variables, I and II,” Physical Review, 85: 166–193.Google Scholar
Bohr, N. (1928). “The quantum postulate and the recent development of atomic theory,” Nature, 121: 580–590.Google Scholar
Bohr, N. (1935). “Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?,” Physical Review, 48: 696–702.Google Scholar
Bohr, N. (1948). “On the notions of causality and complementarity,” Dialectica, 2: 312–319.Google Scholar
Bub, J. (1997). Interpreting the Quantum World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dickson, M. and Clifton, R. (1998). “Lorentz invariance in modal interpretations,” pp. 9–47 in Dieks, D. and Vermaas, P. (eds.), The Modal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Dieks, D. (1985). “On the covariant description of wave function collapse,” Physics Letters A, 108: 379–383.Google Scholar
Dieks, D. (2009). “Objectivity in perspective: relationism in the interpretation of quantum mechanics,” Foundations of Physics, 39: 760–775.Google Scholar
Dieks, D. (2017). “Niels Bohr and the formalism of quantum mechanics,” pp. 303–333 in Faye, J. and Folse, H. J. (eds.), Niels Bohr and the Philosophy of Physics − Twenty-First-Century Perspectives. London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Dieks, D. and Vermaas, P. (eds.). (1998). The Modal Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Everett, H. (1957). “‘Relative state’ formulation of quantum mechanics,” Reviews of Modern Physics, 29: 454–462.Google Scholar
Fleming, G. (1996). “Just how radical is hyperplane dependence?,” pp. 11–28 in Clifton, R. (ed.), Perspectives on Quantum Reality. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
Fortin, S. and Lombardi, O. (2019). “Wigner and his many friends: a new no-go result?,” http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/id/eprint/15552.Google Scholar
Frauchiger, D. and Renner, R. (2016). “Single-world interpretations of quantum theory cannot be self-consistent,” arXiv:1604.07422v1 [quant-ph].Google Scholar
Greenberger, D., Horne, M., Shimony, A., and Zeilinger, A. (1990). “Bell’s theorem without inequalities,” American Journal of Physics, 58: 1131–1143.Google Scholar
Griffiths, R. (2017). “The consistent histories approach to quantum mechanics,” in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2017 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/qm-consistent-histories/Google Scholar
Johnson, K., Wong-Campos, J., Neyenhuis, B., Mizrahi, J., and Monroe, C. (2017). “Ultrafast creation of large Schrödinger cat states of an atom,” Nature Communications, 8: Article 697. doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00682-6.Google Scholar
Laudisa, F. and Rovelli, C. (2013). “Relational quantum mechanics,” in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2013 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/qm-relational/Google Scholar
Leegwater, G. (2018). “When Greenberger, Horne and Zeilinger meet Wigner’s Friend,” arXiv:1811.02442 [quant-ph].Google Scholar
Lombardi, O. and Castagnino, M. (2008). “A modal-Hamiltonian interpretation of quantum mechanics,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 39: 380–443.Google Scholar
Lombardi, O. and Dieks, D. (2017). “Modal interpretations of quantum mechanics,” in Zalta, E. N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2017 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/qm-modal/Google Scholar
London, F. and Bauer, E. (1939). La Théorie de l’Observation en Mécanique Quantique. Paris: Hermann. English translation, pp. 217–259 in Wheeler, J. A. and Zurek, W. H. (eds.), 1983, Quantum Theory and Measurement. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Myrvold, W. (2002a). “Modal interpretations and relativity,” Foundations of Physics, 32: 1773–1784.Google Scholar
Myrvold, W. (2002b). “On peaceful coexistence: is the collapse postulate incompatible with relativity?,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 33: 435–466.Google Scholar
Rovelli, C. (1996). “Relational quantum mechanics,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 35: 1637–1678.Google Scholar
Smerlak, M. and Rovelli, C. (2007). “Relational EPR,” Foundations of Physics, 37: 427–445.Google Scholar
Sudbery, A. (2017). “Single-world theory of the extended Wigner’s friend experiment,” Foundations of Physics, 47: 658–669.Google Scholar
Vermaas, P. and Dieks, D. (1995). “The modal interpretation of quantum mechanics and its generalization to density operators,” Foundations of Physics, 25: 145–158.Google Scholar
von Neumann, J. (1932). Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- 12
- Cited by