Book contents
- Quantum Worlds
- Quantum Worlds
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- Part I Ontology from Different Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics
- Part II Realism, Wave Function, and Primitive Ontology
- Part III Individuality, Distinguishability, and Locality
- 10 Making Sense of Nonindividuals in Quantum Mechanics
- 11 From Quantum to Classical Physics: The Role of Distinguishability
- 12 Individuality and the Account of Nonlocality: The Case for the Particle Ontology in Quantum Physics
- 13 Beyond Loophole-Free Experiments: A Search for Nonergodicity
- Part IV Symmetries and Structure in Quantum Mechanics
- Part V The Relationship between the Quantum Ontology and the Classical World
- Index
- References
13 - Beyond Loophole-Free Experiments: A Search for Nonergodicity
from Part III - Individuality, Distinguishability, and Locality
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 April 2019
Book contents
- Quantum Worlds
- Quantum Worlds
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- Part I Ontology from Different Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics
- Part II Realism, Wave Function, and Primitive Ontology
- Part III Individuality, Distinguishability, and Locality
- 10 Making Sense of Nonindividuals in Quantum Mechanics
- 11 From Quantum to Classical Physics: The Role of Distinguishability
- 12 Individuality and the Account of Nonlocality: The Case for the Particle Ontology in Quantum Physics
- 13 Beyond Loophole-Free Experiments: A Search for Nonergodicity
- Part IV Symmetries and Structure in Quantum Mechanics
- Part V The Relationship between the Quantum Ontology and the Classical World
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Quantum WorldsPerspectives on the Ontology of Quantum Mechanics, pp. 245 - 266Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Abarbanel, H. (1983) “The analysis of observed chaotic data in physical systems,” Reviews of Modern Physics, 65: 1331–1392.Google Scholar
Agüero, M., Hnilo, A., Kovalsky, M., and Larotonda, M. (2009). “Time stamping in EPRB experiments: Application on the test of non-ergodic theories,” European Physical Journal D, 55: 705–709.Google Scholar
Agüero, M., Hnilo, A., and Kovalsky, M. (2012). “Time resolved measurement of the Bell’s inequalities and the coincidence-loophole,” Physical Review A, 86: 052121.Google Scholar
Agüero, M., Hnilo, A., and Kovalsky, M. (2014). “Measuring the entanglement of photons produced by a nanosecond pulsed source,” Journal of the Optical Society of America B, 31: 3088–3096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballentine, L. E. (1998). Quantum Mechanics. A Modern Development. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonazzola, C., Hnilo, A., Kovalsky, M., and Tredicce, J. (2015). “Features of the extreme events observed in an all-solid-state laser with saturable absorber,” Physical Review A, 92: 053816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buonomano, V. (1978). “A limitation on Bell’s inequality,” Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré, 29A: 379–394.Google Scholar
Clauser, J. and Shimony, A. (1978). “Bell’s theorem: Experimental tests and implications,” Reports on Progress in Physics, 41: 1881–1927.Google Scholar
d’Espagnat, B. (1984). “Nonseparability and the tentative descriptions of reality,” Physics Reports, 110: 201–264.Google Scholar
Gisin, N. (1990). “Weinberg’s non-linear quantum mechanics and superluminal communications,” Physics Letters A, 143: 1–2.Google Scholar
Giustina, M., Versteegh, M. A. M., Wengerowsky, S., Handsteiner, J., Hochrainer, A., Phelan, K., … Zeilinger, A. (2015). “A significant loophole-free test of Bell’s theorem with entangled photons,” Physical Review Letters, 115: 250401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hnilo, A. (1994). “On testing objective local theories by using GHZ states,” Foundations of Physics, 24: 139–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hnilo, A. (2012). “Observable consequences of a hypothetical transient deviation from Quantum Mechanics,” arXiv/quant-ph/1212.5722.Google Scholar
Hnilo, A. (2014). “On the meaning of an additional hypothesis in the Bell’s inequalities,” arXiv/quant-ph/1402.6177.Google Scholar
Hnilo, A. (2017a). “Consequences of recent loophole-free experiments on a relaxation of measurement independence,” Physical Review A, 95: 022102.Google Scholar
Hnilo, A. (2017b). “Using measured values in Bell’s inequalities entails at least one hypothesis additional to Local Realism,” Entropy, 19: 80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hnilo, A. and Agüero, M. (2015). “Simple experiment to test a hypothetical transient deviation from Quantum Mechanics,” arXiv/abs/1507.01766.Google Scholar
Hnilo, A., Peuriot, A., and Santiago, G. (2002). “Local realistic models tested by the EPRB experiment with random variable analyzers,” Foundations of Physics Letters, 15: 359–371.Google Scholar
Jaynes, E. T. (1980). “Quantum beats,” pp. 37–43 in Barut, A. (ed.), Foundations of Radiation Theory and Quantum Electrodynamics. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Khrennikov, A. (2017). “Buonomano against Bell: Nonergodicity or nonlocality?”, International Journal of Quantum Information, 8: 1740010.Google Scholar
Kovalsky, M. and Hnilo, A. (2004). “Different routes to chaos in the Ti: Sapphire laser,” Physical Review A, 70: 043813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurtsiefer, C., Oberparleiter, M., and Weinfurter, H. (2001). “High efficiency entangled photon pair collection in type II parametric fluorescence,” Physical Review A, 64: 023802.Google Scholar
Mermin, D. (1990). “Extreme quantum entanglement in a superposition of macroscopically distinct states,” Physical Review, 65: 1838–1840.Google Scholar
Peng, C., Yang, T., Bao, X., Zhang, J., Jin, X., Feng, F., … Pan, J. W. (2005). “Experimental free-space distribution of entangled photon pairs over 13km: towards satellite-based global quantum communication,” Physical Review Letters, 94: 150501.Google Scholar
Polchinski, J. (1991). “Weinberg’s nonlinear quantum mechanics and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox,” Physical Review Letters, 66: 397–400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scheidl, T., Ursin, R., Kofler, J., Ramelow, S., Ma, X. -S., Herbst, T., … Zeilinger, A. (2010). “Violation of local realism with freedom of choice,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107: 19708–19713.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scully, O. M. and Zubairy, M. S. (1997). Quantum Optics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shalm, L. Meyer-Scott, E., Christensen, B., Bierhorst, P., Wayne, M., Stevens, M., … Nam, S. W. (2015). “A strong loophole-free test of local realism,” Physical Review Letters, 115: 250402.Google Scholar
Weihs, G., Jennewein, T., Simon, C., Weinfurter, H., and Zeilinger, A. (1998). “Violation of Bell’s inequality under strict Einstein locality conditions,” Physical Review Letters, 81: 5039–5043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar