References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 May 2019
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Bagarello, F., Quantum dynamics for classical systems: With applications of the number operator, John Wiley Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messiah, A., Quantum mechanics, vol. 2, North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 1962.Google Scholar
Bagarello, F., Bravo, G., Gargano, F., Tamburino, L., Large-scale effects of migration and conflict in pre-agricultural human groups: insights from a dynamic model, PLoS ONE, 12, e0172262, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagarello, F., Di Salvo, R., Gargano, F., Oliveri, F., (H, ρ)-induced dynamics and the quantum game of life, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 43, 15–32, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagarello, F., Di Salvo, R., Gargano, F., Oliveri, F., (H, ρ)-induced dynamics and large time behaviors, Physica A, 505, 355–373 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagarello, F., Oliveri, F., An operator description of interactions between populations with applications to migration, Mathematical Models Methods in Applied Sciences, 23, 471–492, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagarello, F., Gargano, F., Oliveri, F., A phenomenological operator description of dynamics of crowds: Escape strategies, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 39, 2276–2294, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagarello, F., Oliveri, F., An operator-like description of love affairs, SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics, 70, 3235–3251, 2011.Google Scholar
Bagarello, F., Damping in quantum love affairs, Physica A, 390, 2803–2811, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagarello, F., Basieva, I., Khrennikov, A., Quantum field inspired model of decision making: Asymptotic stabilization of the belief state via interaction with surrounding mental environment, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 82, 159–168, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagarello, F., An operator view on alliances in politics, SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics, 75, No. 2, 564–584, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagarello, F., Gargano, F., Modeling interactions between political parties and electors, Physica A, 481, 243–264, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagarello, F., Haven, E., Khrennikov, A., A model of adaptive decision making from representation of information environment by quantum fields, Philosophical Transactions A, 375, 20170162, 2017.Google Scholar
Bagarello, F., A quantum-like view to a generalized two players game, International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 54, No. 10, 3612–3627, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagarello, F., Basieva, I., Khrennikov, A., Pothos, E., Quantum like modeling of decision making: Quantifying uncertainty with the aid of Heisenberg-Robinson inequality, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 84, 49–56, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, D., Davies, P.C.W., Pati, A.K., Quantum aspects of life, Imperial College Press, London, UK, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baaquie, B.E., Quantum finance, path integrals and Hamiltonians for options and interest rates, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baaquie, B.E., Interest rates and coupon bonds in quantum finance, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busemeyer, J.R., Bruza, P.D., Quantum models of cognition and decision, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haven, E., Khrennikov, A., Quantum social science, Cambridge University Press, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khrennikov, A., Ubiquitous quantum structure: From psychology to finance, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagarello, F., Gazeau, J.P., Szafraniec, F.H., Znojil, M., Eds., Non-selfadjoint operators in quantum physics: Mathematical aspects, John Wiley Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bender, C., Making sense of non-hermitian hamiltonians, Reports on Progress in Physics, 70, 947–1018, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mostafazadeh, A., Pseudo-Hermitian representation of quantum mechanics, International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics, 7, 1191–1306, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagarello, F., Gargano, F., Non-hermitian operator modelling of basic cancer cell dynamics, Entropy, 2018. doi:10.3390/e20040270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, M., Simon, B., Methods of modern mathematical physics, I, Academic Press, New York, 1980.Google Scholar
Antoine, J.-P., Inoue, A., Trapani, C., Partial*-algebras and their operator realizations, Kluwer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagarello, F., Algebras of unbounded operators and physical applications: A survey, Reviews in Mathematical Physics, 19, No. 3, 231–272, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmüdgen, K., Unbounded operator algebras and representation theory, Birkhäuser, Basel, Switzerland, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagarello, F., Quons, coherent states and intertwining operators, Physics Letters A, 373, 2637–2642, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagarello, F., Deformed quons and bi-coherent states, Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 473, 20170049, 2017.Google Scholar
Eremin, V.V., Meldianov, A.A., The q-deformed harmonic oscillator, coherent states and the uncertainty relation, Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, 147, No. 2, 709–715, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fivel, D.I., Interpolation between Fermi and Bose statistics using generalized commutators, Physical Review Letters, 65, 3361–3364, 1990;Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, O.W., Particles with small violations of Fermi or Bose statistics, Physical Review D, 43, 4111–4120, 1991.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mohapatra, R.N., Infinite statistics and a possible small violation of the Pauli principle, Physics Letters B, 242, 407–411, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagchi, B., Biswas, S.N., Khare, A., Roy, P.K., Truncated harmonic oscillator and parasupersymmetric quantum mechanics, Pramana, 49, No. 2, 199–204, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchdahl, H.A., Concerning a kind of truncated quantized linear harmonic oscillator, American Journal of Physics, 35, 210–218, 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagarello, F., Deformed canonical (anti-)commutation relations and non hermitian hamiltonians, in Non-selfadjoint operators in quantum physics: Mathematical aspects, Bagarello, F., Gazeau, J.P., Szafraniec, F.H. and Znojil, M., Eds., John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagarello, F., Finite-dimensional pseudo-bosons: A non-Hermitian version of the truncated harmonic oscillator, Physics Letters A. doi:10.1016/j.physleta. 2018.06.044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratteli, O. and Robinson, D.W., Operator algebras and quantum statistical mechanics 1, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sewell, G.L., Quantum theory of collective phenomena, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1989.Google Scholar
Barnett, S.M., Radmore, P.M., Methods in theoretical quantum optics, Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK, 1997.Google Scholar
Ben-Aryeh, Y., Mann, A., Yaakov, I., Rabi oscillations in a two-level atomic system with a pseudo-hermitian hamiltonian, Journal of Physics A, 37, 12059–12066, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherbal, O., Drir, M., Maamache, M., Trifonov, D.A., Fermionic coherent states for pseudo-Hermitian two-level systems, Journal of Physics A, 40, 1835–1844, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagarello, F., Linear pseudo-fermions, Journal of Physics A, 45, 444002, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pascazio, S., All you ever wanted to know about quantum Zeno effect in 70 minutes, Open Systems Information Dynamics, 21, 1440007, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galam, S., Sociophysics, A physicist’s modeling of psycho-political phenomena, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buonomo, B., d’Onofrio, A., Modeling the influence of publics memory on the corruption popularity dilemma in politics, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 158, 554–575, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, O.A., Hinich, M.J., Ordeshook, P., An expository development of a mathematical model of the electoral process, The American Political Science Review, 64, No. 2, 426–448, 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feichtinger, G., Wirl, F., On the stability and potential cyclicity of corruption in governments subject to popularity constraints, Mathematical Social Sciences, 28, 113–131, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galam, S., Majority rule, hierarchical structures, and democratic totalitarianism: A statistical approach, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 30, 426–434, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galam, S., The drastic outcomes from voting alliances in three-party democratic voting (19902013), Journal of Statistical Physics, 151, 46–68, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, S.E., Sander, L.M., Schneider-Mizell, C.M., Conformity and dissonance in generalized voter models, Journal of Statistical Physics, 128, 1279–1287, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palombi, F., Toti, S., Stochastic dynamics of the multi-state voter model over a network based on interacting cliques and zealot candidates, Journal of Statistical Physics, 156, 336–367, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raffaelli, G., Marsili, M., Statistical mechanics model for the emergence of consensus, Physical Review E, 72, 016114, 2005.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Di Salvo, R., Gorgone, M., Oliveri, F., Political dynamics affected by turncoats, International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 56, No. 11, 3604–3614, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Salvo, R., Gorgone, M., Oliveri, F., -induced political dynamics: Facets of the disloyal attitudes into the public opinion, International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 56, No. 12, 3912–3922, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khrennikova, P., Haven, E., Khrennikov, A., An application of the theory of open quantum systems to model the dynamics of party governance in the US Political System, International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 53, No. 4, 1346–1360, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khrennikova, P., Order effect in a study on voters preferences: Quantum framework representation of the observables, Physica Scripta, 163, 18, 2014.Google Scholar
Khrennikova, P., Quantum like modelling of the nonseparability of voters preferences in the US political system, In Atmanspacher et al. (Eds.), Lecture notes in computer science: Vol. 8951. Quantum Interactions, 8th International Conference, QI 2014, Filzbach, Switzerland, June 30–July 3, 2014 (pp. 196–209).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khrennikova, P., Quantum dynamical modeling of competition and cooperation between political parties: The coalition and non-coalition equilibrium model, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 71, 3950, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makowski, M., Piotrowski, E.W., Decisions in elections transitive or intransitive quantum preferences, Journal of Physics A, 44, No. 21, 215303, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagarello, F., Cherubini, A.M., Oliveri, F., An operatorial description of desertification, SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics, 76, No. 2, 479–499, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pothos, E.M., Busemeyer, J.R., Can quantum probability provide a new direction for cognitive modeling? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36, 255327, 2013.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bagarello, F., An improved model of alliances between political parties, Ricerche di Matematica, 65, No. 2, 399–412, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, J.F., Stafford Smith, D.M., Lambin, E.F., Turner II, B.L., Mortimore, M., Batterbury, S.P.J., Downing, T.E. et al., Global desertification: Building a science for dryland development, Science, 316, 847–851, 2007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dakos, V., Carpenter, S.R., Brock, W., Ellison, A.M., Guttal, V., Ives, A.R., Kéfi, S., Livina, V., Seekell, D.A., E.H. van Nes, Scheffer, M., Methods for detecting early warnings of critical transitions in time series illustrated using simulated ecological data, PLoS ONE, 7, e41010, 2012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kéfi, S., Guttal, V., Brock, W.A., Carpenter, S.R., Ellison, A.M., V.N. Livina, Seekell, D.A., Scheffer, M., van Nes, E.H., Dakos, V., Early warning signals of ecological transitions: Methods for spatial patterns, PLoS One, 9, E92097, 2014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corrado, R., Cherubini, A.M., Pennetta, C., Critical desertification transition in semi-arid ecosystems: The role of local facilitation and colonization rate, Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 22, 3–12, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra, E.W., A note on two problems in connexion with graphs, Numerische Mathematik, 1, 269–271, 1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shi, D.-M., Wang, B.-H., Evacuation of pedestrians from a single room by using snowdrift game theories. Physical Review E, 87, 022802, 2013.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guo, R.-Y., Huang, H.J., Route choice in pedestrian evacuation: Formulated using a potential field. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 4, P04012, 2011.Google Scholar
Helbing, D., Farkas, I.J., Vicsek, T.. Simulating dynamical features of escape panic, Nature, 407, 487–490, 2000.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kirchner, A., Schadschneider, A., Simulation of evacuation processes using a bionics-inspired cellular automaton model for Pedestrian dynamics, Physica A, 312, 260–276, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagai, R., Fukamachi, M., Nagatani, T., Evacuation of crawlers and walkers from corridor through an exit, Physica A, 367, 449–460, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varas, A., Cornejo, M.D., Mainemer, D., Toledo, B., Rogan, J., Muñoz, V., Valdivia, J.A., Cellular automaton model for evacuation process with obstacles, Physica A, 2, 631–642, 2007.Google Scholar
Yuan, W., Tan, K.H., A model for simulation of crowd behaviour in the evacuation from a smoke-filled compartment, Physica A, 390, 4210–4218, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiaoping, Z., Tingkuan, Z., Mengting, L., Modeling crowd evacuation of a building based on seven methodological approaches, Building and Environment, 44, 437–445, 2009.Google Scholar
Xiaoping, Z., Zhong, T.K., Liu, M.T., Study on numeral simulation approaches of crowd evacuation, Journal of System Simulation, 21, 3503–3508, 2009.Google Scholar
Brilkov, A.V., Ganusov, V.V., Morozova, E.V., Pechurkin, N.S., Computer modeling of the biotic cycle formation in a closed ecological system, Advances in Space Research, 27, 1587–1592, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Angelis, D.L., Mathematical modeling relevant to closed artificial ecosystems, Advances in Space Research, 31, 1657–1665, 2003.Google ScholarPubMed
Svirezhev, Y.M., Krysanova, V.P., Voinov, A.A., Mathematical modelling of a fish pond ecosystem, Ecological Modelling, 21, 315–337, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, R.M., Stability and complexity in model ecosystems, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1973.Google ScholarPubMed
Bagarello, F., Oliveri, F., Dynamics of closed ecosystems described by operators, Ecological Modeling, 275, 89–99, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Salvo, R., Oliveri, F., On fermionic models of a closed ecosystem with application to bacterial populations, Atti della Accademia Peloritana dei Pericolanti, 94, No. 2, A5, 2016.Google Scholar
Di Salvo, R., Oliveri, F., An operatorial model for long-term survival of bacterial populations, Ricerche di Matematica, 65, 435–447, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, T.R., Fry, A.M., Haven, E., Quantum counting: Operator methods for discrete population dynamics with applications to cell division, Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 130, 106–119, 2017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bagarello, F., Passante, R., Trapani, C., Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians in Quantum Physics, Selected Contributions from the 15th International Conference on Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians in Quantum Physics, Palermo, Italy, 18–23 May 2015, Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, T.M., Burger, C.J., Elgert, K.D., Tumor growth alters T cell and macrophage production of and responsiveness to granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor: Partial dysregulation through interleukin-10, Cellular Immunology, 154, No. 2, 342–357, 1994.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gardner, M., Mathematical games: The fantastic combinations of John Conways new solitiare game of Life, Scientific American, 223, No. 10, 120, 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, M., Mathematical games: On cellular automata, self-reproduction, the Garden of Eden and the game of Life, Scientific American, 224, No. 2, 116, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J., Adachi, S., Peper, F., Morita, K., Asynchronous game of life, Physica D, 194, 369–384, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrighi, P., Grattage, J., A quantum game of life, TUSC. Journées Automates Cellulaires 2010, Finland, 31–42, 2010.Google Scholar
Bleh, D., Calarco, T., Montagero, S., Quantum game of life, Europhysics Letters A, 97, 20012, 2012.Google Scholar
Flitney, A.P., Abbott, D., Towards a quantum game of life, Game of Life Cellular Automata, Springer, London, UK, 465–486, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golberg, A., Mychajliw, A.M., Hadly, E.A., Post-invasion demography of prehistoric humans in South America, Nature, 532, 232–245, 2016.Google Scholar
Boserup, E., The conditions of agricultural growth: The economics of agrarian change under population pressure, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ, 2005.Google Scholar
Bravo, G., Tamburino, L., Are two resources really better than one? Some unexpected results of the availability of substitutes, Journal of Environmental Management, 92 No. 11, 2865–2874, 2011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kyle, A.S., Continuous auctions an insider trading, Econometrica, 53, 1315–1335, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haven, E., The variation of financial arbitrage via the use of an information wave function, International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 51, 193–199, 2008.Google Scholar
Bagarello, F., Haven, E., The role of information in a two-traders market, Physica A, 404, 224–233, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagarello, F., Haven, E., Towards a formalization of a two traders market with information exchange, Physica Scripta, 90, 015203, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agrawal, P.M., Sharda, R., OR Forum – Quantum mechanics and human decision making, Operations Research, 61 No. 1, 1–16, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asano, M., Ohya, M., Tanaka, Y., Basieva, I., Khrennikov, A., Quantum-like dynamics of decision-making, Physica A, 391, 2083–2099, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busemeyer, J.R., Pothos, E.M., A quantum probability explanation for violations of “rational” decision theory, Proeedings of the Royal Society B, 276 No. 1665, 2171–2178, 2009.Google Scholar
Busemeyer, J.R., Wang, Z., Townsend, J.T., Quantum dynamics of human decision-making, Journal Mathematical Psychology, 50, 220–241, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conte, E., Todarello, O., Federici, A., Vitiello, F., Lopane, M., Khrennikov, A., Zbilut, J.P., Some remarks on an experiment suggesting quantum-like behavior of cognitive entities and formulation of an abstract quantum mechanical formalism to describe cognitive entity and its dynamics, Chaos Solitons Fractals, 31, 1076–1088, 2006.Google Scholar
Manousakis, E., Quantum formalism to describe binocular rivalry, Biosystems, 98, No. 2, 5766, 2009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martínez-Martínez, I., A connection between quantum decision theory and quantum games: The Hamiltonian of Strategic Interaction, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 58, 3344, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bevilacqua, A. Leoneti, Utility function for modeling group multicriteria Decision Making problems as games, Operations Research Perspectives, 3, 21–26, 2016.Google Scholar
Machina, M., Expected utility analysis without the independence axiom, Econometrica, 50, No. 2, 277–323, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheng, C.L., A general utility functions for decision making, Mathematical Modeling, 5, 265–274, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asano, M., Ohya, M., Tanaka, Y., Basieva, I., Khrennikov, A., Quantum-like model of brains functioning: Decision making from decoherence, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 281, No. 1, 56–64, 2011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, D.W., Measuring new types of question-order effects, Public Opinion Quarterly, 66, 8091, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozawa, M., Quantum perfect correlations, Annals of Physics, 321, 744769, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozawa, M., Quantum reality and measurement: A quantum logical approach, Foundations of Physics, 41, 592607, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ozawa, M., Probabilistic interpretation of quantum theory, New Generation Computing, 34, 125–152, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Z., Busemeyer, J.R., A quantum question order model supported by empirical tests of an a priori and precise prediction, Topics in Cognitive Sciences, 5, 689–710, 2013.Google ScholarPubMed