Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface: Learning to Think Like a Social Scientist
- About the Contributors
- PART I MODELS AND METHODS IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES
- PART II HISTORY
- 4 Historical Background of Quantitative Social Science
- 5 Sources of Historical Data
- 6 Historical Perspectives on International Exchange Rates
- 7 Historical Data and Demography in Europe and the Americas
- PART III ECONOMICS
- PART IV SOCIOLOGY
- PART V POLITICAL SCIENCE
- PART VI PSYCHOLOGY
- PART VII TO TREAT OR NOT TO TREAT: CAUSAL INFERENCE IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES
- References
- Index
4 - Historical Background of Quantitative Social Science
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface: Learning to Think Like a Social Scientist
- About the Contributors
- PART I MODELS AND METHODS IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES
- PART II HISTORY
- 4 Historical Background of Quantitative Social Science
- 5 Sources of Historical Data
- 6 Historical Perspectives on International Exchange Rates
- 7 Historical Data and Demography in Europe and the Americas
- PART III ECONOMICS
- PART IV SOCIOLOGY
- PART V POLITICAL SCIENCE
- PART VI PSYCHOLOGY
- PART VII TO TREAT OR NOT TO TREAT: CAUSAL INFERENCE IN THE SOCIAL SCIENCES
- References
- Index
Summary
QUANTIFICATION AND THE RISE OF THE WEST
The origins of quantification in social thought reach far back into history. Numbers are found in the classical Greek texts as well as in traditional Indian, Chinese, and Islamic texts, but the sort of quantitative analysis that we are particularly interested in is a European invention that has flourished in the past few centuries and whose roots go back to the Middle Ages. I'll be referring to an interesting work by Alfred Crosby (1997), who asks, why do we count, and do Europeans count differently from everybody else? Did they start at a different time than everybody else, and if so, why? Crosby studies quantification in Western society from 1250 to 1600, and he incidentally sheds light on another of the great debates in history: Why did Europe conquer or expand over the rest of the world? It should not have occurred. Europe in 1500 was not the wealthiest area in the world, nor was it the most advanced area economically, nor did it have the most advanced technology at the time. It was in fact a relatively backward zone of world civilization. Nonetheless, Europeans conquered the world's sea lanes and became the dominant world powers until the twentieth century. Europeans did not merely touch on areas of the world unknown to them and then move on. After all, the Chinese had junks trading on the East African coast long before the Portuguese reached the West African coast.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- A Quantitative Tour of the Social Sciences , pp. 35 - 51Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2009