References

Erik D. Reichle; Lili Yu

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 January 2024

Erik D. Reichle and

Lili Yu

Show author details

Erik D. Reichle: Affiliation:
Macquarie University, Sydney
Lili Yu: Affiliation:
Macquarie University, Sydney

Book contents

Get access

Type: Chapter
Information: The Psychology of Reading
Insights from Chinese
, pp. 189 - 220

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009272780 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akmajian, A., Demers, R. A., Farmer, A. K., & Harnish, R. M. (2010). Linguistics: An introduction to language and communication. Sixth edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Anderson, R. C., Li, W., Ku, Y. M., Shu, H., & Wu, N. (2003). Use of partial information in learning to read Chinese characters. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 52–7.Google Scholar

Andrews, S. (1989). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 802–14.Google Scholar

Andrews, S. (1992). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 234–54.Google Scholar

Andrews, S. (1997). The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 439–61.Google Scholar

Ans, B., Carbonnel, S., & Valdois, S. (1998). A connectionist multiple-trace memory model for polysyllabic word reading. Psychological Review, 105, 678–723.Google Scholar

Antúnex, M., Milligan, S., Hernández-Cabrera, J. A., Barber, H. A., & Schotter, E. (2021). Semantic parafoveal processing in natural reading: Insight from fixation-related potentials & eye movements. Psychophysiology, e13986. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13986.Google Scholar

Bai, X., Hu, X., & Yan, G. (2009). Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in Chinese reading: The influence of semantic transparencies of word N on word N-1 processing. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 41, 377–86. [白学军, 胡笑羽, & 闫国利. (2009). 中文阅读的副中央凹-中央凹效应: 词n的语义透明度对词n-1加工的影响. 心理学报, 41, 377–86.]Google Scholar

Bai, X., Yan, G., Liversedge, S. P., Zang, C., & Rayner, K. (2008). Reading spaced and unspaced Chinese text: evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 1277–87.Google Scholar

Baillet, S. (2017). Magnetoencephalography for brain electrophysiology and imaging. Nature Neuroscience, 20, 327–39.Google Scholar

Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 340–57.Google Scholar

Balota, D. A., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1985). The interaction of contextual constraints and parafoveal visual information in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 17, 364–90.Google Scholar

Balota, D., Yap, M. J., Hutchinson, K. A., Cortese, M. J., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., et al. (2007). The English Lexicon Project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445–59.Google Scholar

Bi, H., Hu, W., & Weng, X. (2006). Orthographic neighborhood effects in the pronunciation of Chinese words. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 38, 791–7. [毕鸿燕, 胡伟, & 翁旭初. (2006). 汉语形声字声旁家族大小对整字发音的影响. 心理学报, 38, 791–7.]Google Scholar

Binder, J. R., Medler, D. A., Westbury, C. F., Liebenthal, E., & Buchanan, L. (2006). Tuning of the human fusiform gyrus to sublexical orthographic structure. NeuroImage, 33, 739–78.Google Scholar

Bishop, D. V., & Snowling, M. J. (2004). Developmental dyslexia and specific language impairment: Same or different? Psychological Bulletin, 130, 858–86.Google Scholar

Bolger, D. J., Perfetti, C. A., & Schneider, W. (2005). Cross-cultural effect on the brain revisited: Universal structure plus writing system variation. Human Brain Mapping, 25, 92–104.Google Scholar

Bouma, H. (1973). Visual interference in the parafoveal recognition of initial and final letters of words. Vision Research, 13, 767–82.Google Scholar

Brysbaert, M. (2019). How many words do we read per minute? A review and meta-analysis of reading rate. Journal of Memory and Language, 109, 104047.Google Scholar

Brysbaert, M., Mandera, P., & Keuleers, E. (2018). The word frequency effect in word processing: An updated review. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27, 45–50.Google Scholar

Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 977–90.Google Scholar

Cacciari, C., & Tabossi, P. (1988). The comprehension of idioms. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 668–83.Google Scholar

Cai, H., Qi, X., Chen, Q., & Zhong, Y. (2012). Effects of phonetic radical position on the regularity effect for naming pictophonetic characters. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 44, 868–81. [蔡厚德, 齐星亮, 陈庆荣, & 钟元. (2012). 声旁位置对形声字命名规则性效应的影响. 心理学报, 44, 868–81.]Google Scholar

Cao, F., Peng, D., Liu, L., Jin, Z., Fan, N., Deng, Y., Booth, J. L. (2009). Developmental differences of neurocognitive networks for phonological and semantic processing in Chinese word reading. Human Brain Mapping, 30, 797–809.Google Scholar

Cao, F., & Perfetti, C. A. (2016). Neural signatures of the reading-writing connection: Greater involvement of writing in Chinese reading than English reading. PloS One, 11, e0168414.Google Scholar

Cao, F., Vu, M., Chan, D. H. L., Lawrence, J. M., Harris, L., Guan, Q. Xu, Y., & Perfetti, C. A. (2013). Writing affects the brain network of reading in Chinese: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Human Brain Mapping, 34, 1670–84.Google Scholar

Cao, H., Lan, Z., Gao, F., Yu, H., Li, P., & Wang, J. (2023). The role of character positional frequency on word recognition during Chinese reading: Lexical decision and eye movements studies. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 55, 159–76. [曹海波, 兰泽波, 高峰, 于海涛, 李鹏, & 王敬欣. (2023). 词素位置概率在中文阅读中的作用: 词汇判断和眼动研究. 心理学报, 55, 159–76.]Google Scholar

Caravolas, M., Lervag, A., Defior, S., Malkova, G. S., & Hulme, C. (2013). Different patterns, but equivalent predictors, of growth in reading in consistent and inconsistent orthographies. Psychological Science, 24, 1398–407Google Scholar

Carlisle, J. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and mean- ing of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing, 12, 169–90.Google Scholar

Caroll, J. B., & White, M. N. (1973a). Age-of-acquisition norms for 220 picturable nouns. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 563–76.Google Scholar

Caroll, J. B., & White, M. N. (1973b). Word frequency and age of acquisition as determiners of picture-naming latency. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 85–95.Google Scholar

Castles, A., & Coltheart, M. (1993). Varieties of developmental dyslexia. Cognition, 47, 149–80.Google Scholar

Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19, 5–51.Google Scholar

Chang, L. Y., Chen, Y. C., & Perfetti, C. A. (2018). GraphCom: A multidimensional measure of graphic complexity applied to 131 written languages. Behavior Research Methods, 50, 427–49.Google Scholar

Chang, R. & Chang, M. S. (1978). Speaking of Chinese. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Chang, Y. N., & Lee, C. Y. (2020). Age of acquisition effects on traditional Chinese character naming and lexical decision. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 27, 1317–24.Google Scholar

Chang, Y. N., Welbourne, S., & Lee, C. Y. (2016). Exploring orthographic neighborhood size effects in a computational model of Chinese character naming. Cognitive Psychology, 91, 1–23.Google Scholar

Chen, B. (1993). An experimental study of Collin’s semantic hierarchical network model. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 25, 359–65. [陈宝国. (1993). 柯林斯语义层次网络模型的实验研究. 心理学报, 25, 359–65.]Google Scholar

Chen, B., & Ning, A. (2005). Homophone effects in the recognition of Chinese character: The evidence of phonology influencing the graphic processing of Chinese character. Psychological Exploration, 25, 35–9. [陈宝国, & 宁爱华. (2005). 汉字识别中的同音字效应: 语音影响字形加工的证据. 心理学探新, 25, 35–9.]Google Scholar

Chen, B., & Peng, D. (2001). The time course of graphic, phonological and semantic information processing in Chinese character recognition (I). Acta Psychologica Sinica, 33, 1–6. [陈宝国, & 彭聃龄. (2001). 汉字识别中形音义激活时间进程的研究(Ⅰ). 心理学报, 33, 1–6.]Google Scholar

Chen, B., Wang, L., & Peng, D. (2003). The time course of graphic, phonological and semantic information processing in Chinese character recognition (II). Acta Psychologica Sinica, 35, 576–81. [陈宝国, 王立新, & 彭聃龄. (2003). 汉字识别中形音义激活时间进程的研究 (Ⅱ). 心理学报, 35, 576–81.]Google Scholar

Chen, B., Wang, L., Wang, L., & Peng, D. (2004). The effect of age of word acquisition and frequency on the identification of Chinese double-character words. Journal of Psychological Science, 27, 1060–4. [陈宝国, 王立新, 王璐璐, & 彭聃龄. (2004). 词汇习得年龄和频率对词汇识别的影响. 心理科学, 27, 1060–4.]Google Scholar

Chen, B., You, W., & Zhou, H. (2007). Age of acquisition effects in reading Chinese: Evidence in favor of the semantic hypothesis. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 39, 9–17. [陈宝国, 尤文平, & 周会霞. (2007). 汉语词汇习得的年龄效应: 语义假设的证据. 心理学报, 39, 9–17.]Google Scholar

Chen, B., Zhou, H., Dunlap, S., & Perfetti, C. A. (2007). Age of acquisition effects in reading Chinese: Evidence in favour of the arbitrary mapping hypothesis. British Journal of Psychology, 98, 499–516.Google Scholar

Chen, H. C., Vaid, J., & Wu, J. T. (2009). Homophone density and phonological frequency in Chinese word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 967–82.Google Scholar

Chen, H. C., Song, H., Lau, W. Y., Wong, K. F. E., & Tang, S. L. (2003). Developmental characteristics of eye movements in reading Chinese. In McBride-Chang, C. & Chen, H. C. (eds.), Reading Development in Chinese Children. Westport, CT: Praeger, 157–69.Google Scholar

Chen, H. C. & Tang, C. K. (1998). The effective visual field in reading Chinese. In Leong, C. K. & Tamaoka, K. (eds.), Cognitive Processing of the Chinese and the Japanese Languages. Dordrecht and Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic, 91–100.Google Scholar

Chen, J., & Zhang, J. (2005). The phonological activation of unfamiliar pictophonetic characters of lower-grade pupils. Journal of Psychological Science, 28, 901–05. [陈俊 & 张积家. (2005). 小学低年级学生对陌生形声字的语音提取. 心理科学, 28, 901–05.]Google Scholar

Chen, M., Wang, Y., Zhao, B., Li, X., & Bai, X. (2022). The role of text familiarity in Chinese word segmentation and Chinese vocabulary recognition. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 54, 1151–66. [陈茗静, 王永胜, 赵冰洁, 李馨, & 白学军. (2022). 中文文本熟悉性在词切分和词汇识别中的作用. 心理学报, 54, 1151–66.]Google Scholar

Chen, M. J. & Weekes, B. S. (2004). Effects of semantic radicals on Chinese character categorization and character decision. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 46, 181–96.Google Scholar

Chen, X., Shu, H., Wu, N., & Anderson, R. C. (2003). Stages in learning to pronounce Chinese characters. Psychology in the Schools, 40, 115–24.Google Scholar

Chen, Y. P., Allport, D., & Marshall, J. (1996). What are the functional orthographic units in Chinese word recognition: The stroke or the stroke pattern? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 1024–43.Google Scholar

Chen, Y. M., & Peng, R. (1985). Preliminary study of semantic retrieval for Chinese language. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2, 162–9. [陈永明, & 彭瑞祥. (1985). 汉语语义记忆提取的初步研究. 心理学报, 2, 162–9.]Google Scholar

Cheng, C. M. (1981). The process of recognition of Chinese characters and words. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 70, 137–53. [鄭昭明. (1981). 漢字認知的歷程. 中華心理學刊, 70, 137–53.]Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1959). A review of Skinner’s Verbal Behavior. Language, 35, 26–58.Google Scholar

Christianson, K. (2017). Psycholinguistics. In Aronoff, M. & Rees-Miller, J. (eds.), The Handbook of Linguistics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 345–69.Google Scholar

Clifton, C.Staub, , A., & Rayner, K. (2007). Eye movements in reading words and sentences. In van Gompel, R. P. G., Fischer, M. H., Murray, W. S., & Hill, R. L. (eds.), Eye Movements: A Window on Mind and Brain. Oxford: Elsevier, 341–72.Google Scholar

Cohen, L., Dehaene, S., Naccache, L., Lehericy, S., Dehaene-Lambertz, G., Henaff, M.-A., & Michel, F. (2000). The visual word form area: Spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients. Brain, 123, 291–307.Google Scholar

Cohen, L., Lehericy, S., Chochon, F., Lemer, C., Rivaud, S., & Dehaene, S. (2002). Language-specific tuning of visual cortex? Functional properties of the Visual Word Form Area. Brain, 125, 1054–69.Google Scholar

Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2009). Ventral and dorsal contributions to word reading. In Gazzaniga, M. (ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences. Fourth edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 789–804.Google Scholar

Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407–28.Google Scholar

Collins, R. N., Milliken, B., & Jamieson, R. K. (2020). MINERVA-DE: An instance model of the deficient processing theory. Journal of Memory and Language, 115, 104151.Google Scholar

Coltheart, M. (1987). Attention and Performance XII: The Psychology of Reading. Plymouth: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. Psychological Review, 100, 589–608.Google Scholar

Coltheart, M., Curtis, B., Atkins, P., & Haller, M. (2013). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches. In Cohen, G., Johnstone, R. A., Plunkett, K. (eds.), Exploring Cognition: Damaged Brains and Neural Networks. London: Psychology Press, 381–422.Google Scholar

Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In Dornic, S. (ed.), Attention and Performance VI. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 535–55.Google Scholar

Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C. Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204–56.Google Scholar

Courtney, S. M., Petit, L., Maisog, J. M., Ungerleider, L. G., & Haxby, J. V. (1998). An area specialized for spatial working memory in human front cortex. Science, 279, 1347–52.Google Scholar

Crowder, R. G., & Wagner, R. K. (1992). The Psychology of Reading: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cui, L., Wang, J., Zhang, Y., Cong, F., Zhang, W., & Hyönä, J. (2021). Compound word frequency modifies the effect of character frequency in reading Chinese. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74, 610–33.Google Scholar

Cui, L., Wang, S., Yan, G., & Bai, X. (2010). Parafoveal-on-foveal interactions in normal Chinese reading. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 42, 547–58. [崔磊, 王穗苹, 闫国利, & 白学军. (2010). 中文阅读中副中央凹与中央凹相互影响的眼动实验. 心理学报, 42, 547–58.]Google Scholar

Cui, L., Yan, G., Bai, X., Hyönä, J., Wang, S., & Liversedge, S. P. (2013). Processing of compound-word characters in reading Chinese: An eye-movement-contingent display change study. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 66, 527–47.Google Scholar

Cutter, M. G., Drieghe, D., & Liversedge, S. P. (2014). Preview benefit in English spaced compounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 1778–86.Google Scholar

Davis, C. J. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117, 713–58.Google Scholar

de Wit, B., & Kinoshita, S. (2014). Relatedness proportion effects in semantic categorization: Reconsidering the automatic spreading activation process. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 1733–44.Google Scholar

de Wit, B., & Kinoshita, S. (2015). An RT distribution analysis of relatedness proportion effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization reveals different mechanisms. Memory & Cognition, 43, 99–110.Google Scholar

Deacon, T. W. (1997). The Symbolic Species: The Co-evolution of Language and the Brain. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Dehaene, S. (2009). Reading in the Brain. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (2007). Cultural recycling of cortical maps. Neuron, 57, 384–98.Google Scholar

Ding, G., Peng, D., & Taft, M. (2004). The nature of the mental representation of radicals in Chinese: A priming study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 530–9.Google Scholar

Dong, Y., Nakamura, K., Okada, T., Hanakawa, T., Fukuyama, H., Mazziotta, J. C., & Shibasaki, H. (2005). Neural mechanisms underlying the processing of Chinese words. Neuroscience Research, 52, 139–45.Google Scholar

Durso, F. T., & Johnston, M. K. (1979). Facilitation in naming and categorizing repeated pictures and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 449–59.Google Scholar

Ehri, L. C. (2005). Learning to read words: theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9, 167–88Google Scholar

Ehrlich, S. F., & Rayner, K. (1981). Contextual effects on word perception and eye movements during reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 641–55.Google Scholar

Ellis, A. W., & Morrison, C. M. (1998). Real age-of-acquisition effects in lexical retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 515–23.Google Scholar

Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R. (2011). Parallel graded attention models of reading. In Liversedge, S. P., Gilchrist, I. D., & Everling, S. (eds.), Oxford Handbook on Eye Movements. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 787–800.Google Scholar

Engbert, R., Nuthmann, A., Richter, E., & Kliegl, R. (2005). SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review, 112, 777–813.Google Scholar

Eysenck, M. W., & Keane, M. T. (2015). Cognitive Psychology: A Student’s Handbook. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Fan, X., & Reilly, R. G. (2022). Eye movement control in reading Chinese: A matter of strength of character? Acta Psychologica, 230, 103711.Google Scholar

Farrell, S., & Lewandowsky, S. (2018). Computational Modeling of Cognition and Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Feldman, L. B., & Siok, W. W. (1997). The role of component function in visual recognition of Chinese characters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 776–81.Google Scholar

Feldman, L. B., & Siok, W. W. (1999). Semantic radicals contribute to the visual identification of Chinese characters. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 559–76.Google Scholar

Ferreira, F., & Clifton, C., Jr. (1986). The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 348–68.Google Scholar

Feustel, T. C., Shiffrin, R. M., & Salasoo, A. (1983). Episodic and lexical contributions to the repetition effect in word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 309–46.Google Scholar

Forster, K. I., & Chambers, S. M. (1973). Lexical access and naming time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 627–35.Google Scholar

Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 680–98.Google Scholar

Forster, K. I., & Hector, J. (2002). Cascaded versus noncascaded models of lexical and semantic processing: The turple effect. Memory & Cognition, 30, 1106–17.Google Scholar

Fowler, C. A., Napps, S. E., & Feldman, L. (1985). Relations among regular and irregular morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming. Memory & Cognition, 13, 241–55.Google Scholar

Francis, W., & Kucera, H. (1982). Frequency Analysis of English Usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1982). Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 178–210.Google Scholar

Frazier, L., & Rayner, K. (1987). Resolution of synactic category ambiguities: Eye movements in parsing lexical ambiguous sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 505–26.Google Scholar

Frey, A., & Bosse, M. L. (2018). Perceptual span, visual span, and visual attention span: Three potential ways to quantify limits on visual processing during reading. Visual Cognition, 26, 412–29.Google Scholar

Gao, B., & Gao, F. (2005). The interaction between word frequency and semantic transparency in the recognition of Chinese words. Journal of Psychological Science, 28, 1358–60. [高兵, & 高峰强. (2005). 汉语字词识别中词频和语义透明度的交互作用. 心理科学, 28, 1358–60.]Google Scholar

Gao, L., & Peng, D. (2005). The pre-lexical route in the phonological processing of Chinese phonograms. Journal of Psychological Science, 28, 885–8. [高立群, & 彭聃龄. (2005). 汉语形声字语音加工的前词汇通路. 心理科学, 28, 885–8.]Google Scholar

Geng, S., Guo, W., Rolls, E. T., Xu, K., Jia, T., Zhou, W., et al. (2023). Intersecting distributed networks support convergent linguistic functioning across different languages in bilinguals. Communications Biology, 6, 99.Google Scholar

Gerhand, S., & Barry, C. (1998). Word frequency effects in oral reading are not merely age-of-acquisition effects in disguise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 267–83.Google Scholar

Gerhand, S., & Barry, C. (1999a). Age-of-acquisition and frequency effects in speeded word naming. Cognition, 73, B27–B36.Google Scholar

Gerhand, S., & Barry, C. (1999b). Age of acquisition, word frequency, and the role of phonology in the lexical decision task. Memory & Cognition, 27, 592–602.Google Scholar

Gomez, P., Ratcliff, R., & Perea, M. (2008). The overlap model: A model of letter position coding. Psychological Review, 115, 577–601.Google Scholar

Gough, P. B., & Tumner, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10.Google Scholar

Grainger, J. (1990). Word frequency and neighborhood frequency effects in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 228–40.Google Scholar

Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103, 518–65.Google Scholar

Grainger, J., O’Regan, J. K., Jacobs, A. M., & Segui, J. (1989). On the role of competing word units in visual word recognition: The neighborhood frequency effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 189–95.Google Scholar

Grainger, J. & van Heuven, W. (2003). Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. In Bonin, P. (ed.), The Mental Lexicon. New York: Nova Science, 1–23.Google Scholar

Gu, J., & Li, X. (2015). The effects of character transposition within and across words in Chinese reading. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77, 272–81.Google Scholar

Gu, J., Li, X., & Liversedge, S. P. (2015). Character order processing in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41, 127–37.Google Scholar

Guo, W., Geng, S. Cao, M., & Feng, J. (2022). The brain connectome for Chinese reading. Neuroscience Bulletin, 1–17.Google Scholar

Guo, Y., Wang, Q., & Wang, T. (2021). Interaction between semantic priming and stimulus quality in Chinese words of single character. Journal of Psychological Science, 44, 282–9. [郭艺璇, 王权红, & 王彤彤. (2021). 汉字刺激质量与语义启动间的交互作用. 心理科学, 44, 282–9.]Google Scholar

Han, B. (1994). Development of database of Chinese constituents information – Statistical analysis of the frequency of the constituents and their combination. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 26, 147–52. [韩布新. (1994). 汉字部件信息数据库的建立── 部件和部件组合频率的统计分析. 心理学报, 26, 147–52.]Google Scholar

Handy, T. (2005). Event-Related Potentials: A Methods Handbook. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1999). Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: Insights from connectionist models. Psychological Review, 106, 491–528.Google Scholar

Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2004). Computing the meanings of words in reading: Cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review, 111, 662–720.Google Scholar

Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (1990). Effects of foveal processing difficulty on the perceptual span in reading: Implications for attention and eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 417–29.Google Scholar

Hermena, E. W., & Reichle, E. D. (2020). Insights from the study of Arabic reading. Language and Linguistic Compass, 14, 1–26.Google Scholar

Hintzman, D. L. (1991). Why are formal models useful in psychology? In Hockley, W. E. & Lewandowsky, S. (eds.), Relating Theory and Data: Essay on Human Memory in Honor of Bennet B. Murdock. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 39–56.Google Scholar

Hoosain, R. (1992). Psychological reality of the word in Chinese. Advances in Psychology, 90, 111–30.Google Scholar

Hsiao, J. H. W. & Shillcock, R. (2004). Connectionist modelling of Chinese character pronunciation based on foveal splitting. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 26, 601–06.Google Scholar

Hsiao, J. H. W. & Shillcock, R. (2005). Differences of split and non-split architectures emerged from modelling Chinese character pronunciation. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 27, 989–94.Google Scholar

Hsu, S. H., & Huang, K. C. (2000). Interword spacing in Chinese text layout. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 91, 355–65.Google Scholar

Ho, C. S. H., & Bryant, P. (1997a). Learning to read Chinese beyond the logographic phase. Reading Research Quarterly, 32, 276–89.Google Scholar

Ho, C. S. H., & Bryant, P. (1997b). Phonological skills are important in learning to read Chinese. Developmental Psychology, 33, 946–51.Google Scholar

Ho, C. S. H., Chan, D. W., Chung, K. K., Lee, S. H., & Tsang, S. M. (2007). In search of subtypes of Chinese developmental dyslexia. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 97, 61–83.Google Scholar

Ho, C. S. H., Wong, W. L., & Chan, W. S. (1999). The use of orthographic analogies in learning to read Chinese. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 40, 393–403.Google Scholar

Ho, F. C., & Siegel, L. (2012). Identification of sub-types of students with learning disabilities in reading and its implications for Chinese word recognition and instructional methods in Hong Kong primary schools. Reading and Writing, 25, 1547–71.Google Scholar

Howes, D. H., & Solomon, R. S. (1951). Word frequency, personal values, and visual duration thresholds. Psychological Review, 58, 256–70.Google Scholar

Hu, C. F., & Catts, H. W. (1998). The role of phonological processing in early reading ability: What we can learn from Chinese. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 55–79.Google Scholar

Hu, Y. (1981). Modern Chinese. Expanded edition. Shanghai: Shanghai Educational Publishing House. [胡裕树. (1981). 现代汉语 (增订本). 上海:上海教育出版社.]Google Scholar

Huang, H. S., & Hanley, J. R. (1997). A longitudinal study of phonological awareness, visual skills, and Chinese reading acquisition among first-graders in Taiwan. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 20, 249–68.Google Scholar

Huang, H. W., Lee, C. Y., Tsai, J. L., Lee, C. L., Hung, D. L., & Tzeng, O. J. L. (2006). Orthographic neighborhood effects in reading Chinese two-character words. Neuroreport, 17, 1061–5.Google Scholar

Huang, L., & Li, X. (2020). Early, but not overwhelming: The effect of prior context on segmenting overlapping ambiguous strings when reading Chinese. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73, 1382–95.Google Scholar

Huang, L., Staub, A., & Li, X. (2021). Prior context influences lexical competition when segmenting Chinese overlapping ambiguous strings. Journal of Memory and Language, 118, 104218.Google Scholar

Hue, C. (1992). Recognition processes in character naming. In Chen, H. C. & Tzeng, O. J. L. (eds.), Language Processing in Chinese. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 93–107.Google Scholar

Huey, E. B. (1908). The Psychology and Pedagogy of Reading. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, K. A., Balota, D. A., Neely, J. H., Cortese, M. J., Cohen-Shikora, E. R., Tse, C.-S., et al. (2013). The semantic priming project. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 1099–114.Google Scholar

Inhoff, A. W., Eiter, B. M., & Radach, R. (2005). Time course of linguistic information extraction from consecutive words during eye fixations in reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 979–95.Google Scholar

Inhoff, A. W., & Liu, W. (1998). The perceptual span and oculomotor activity during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 20–34.Google Scholar

Inhoff, A. W., & Rayner, K. (1986). Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 431–9.Google Scholar

Inhoff, A. W., & Wu, C. (2005). Eye movements and the identification of spatially ambiguous words during Chinese sentence reading. Memory & Cognition, 33, 1345–56.Google Scholar

Irwin, D. E. (1998). Lexical processing continues during saccadic eye movements. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 1–27.Google Scholar

Jamieson, R. K., & Mewhort, D. J. K. (2009). Applying an exemplar model to the artificial-grammar task: Inferring grammaticality from similarity. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 550–75.Google Scholar

Jarvella, R., & Meijers, G. (1983). Recognizing morphemes in spoken words: Some evidence for a stem-organized mental lexicon. In Flores d’Arcaos, G. B. & Jarvella, R. (eds.), The Process of Language Understanding. New York: Wiley, 81–112.Google Scholar

Jacoby, L. L. (1983). Perceptual enhancement: Persistent effects of an experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 21–38.Google Scholar

Jatoi, M. A., Kamel, N., Malik, A. S., Faye, I., & Begum, T. (2014). A survey of methods used for source localization using EEG signals. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 11, 42–52.Google Scholar

Johnson, R. L., Perea, M., & Rayner, K. (2007). Transposed-letter effects in reading: Evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 209–29.Google Scholar

Jordan, T. R., Almabruk, A. A. A., Gadalla, E. A., McGowan, V. A., White, S. J., Paterson, K. B., et al. (2014). Reading direction and the central perceptual span: Evidence from Arabic and English. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 505–11.Google Scholar

Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329–54.Google Scholar

Kanwisher, N., & Yovel, G. (2006). The fusiform face area: A cortical region specialized for the perception of faces. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 361, 2109–28.Google Scholar

Keay, J. (2009). China: A history. London: Harper Press.Google Scholar

Kelly, M. A., Mewhort, D. J. K., & West, R. L. (2017). The memory tesseract: Mathematical equivalence between composite and separate storage memory models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 77, 142–55.Google Scholar

Kennison, S. M., & Clifton, C., Jr. (1995). Determinants of parafoveal preview benefit in high and low working memory capacity readers: Implications for eye movement control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 68–81.Google Scholar

Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Klein, R. M., & McMullen, P. A. (2001). Converging Methods for Understanding Reading and Dyslexia. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Kliegl, R., Nuthmann, A., & Engbert, R. (2006). Tracking the mind during reading: The influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 12–35.Google Scholar

Kohonen, T. (1995). Self-Organizing Maps. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar

Ku, Y. M., & Anderson, R. C. (2003). Development of morphological awareness in Chinese and English. Reading and Writing, 16, 399–422.Google Scholar

Kuo, W. J., Yeh, T. C., Lee, C. Y., Wu, Y. T., Chou, C. C., Ho, L. T., Hung, D. L., Tzeng, O. J. L., & Hsieh, J. C. (2003). Frequency effects of Chinese character processing in the brain: An event-related fMRI study. NeuroImage, 18, 720–30.Google Scholar

Kwantes, P. J., & Mewhort, J. K. (1999). Modeling lexical decision and word naming as a retrieval process. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53, 306–15.Google Scholar

Lam, S. S. Y., & McBride-Chang, C. (2013). Parent-child joint writing in Chinese kindergarteners: Explicit instruction in radical knowledge and stroke writing skills. Writing Systems Research, 5, 88–109.Google Scholar

Landerl, K., Castles, A., & Parrila, R. (2022). Cognitive precursors of reading: A cross-linguistic perspective. Scientific Studies of Reading, 26, 111–24.Google Scholar

Lee, C. Y., Tsai, J. L., Kuo, W. J., Yeh, T. C., Wu, Y. T., Ho, L. T., Hung, D. L., Tzeng, O. J. L., & Hsieh, J. C. (2004). Neuronal correlates of consistency and frequency effects on Chinese character naming: An event-related fMRI study. NeuroImage, 23, 1235–45.Google Scholar

Lee, C. Y., Tsai, J. L., Su, E. C. I., Tzeng, O. J., & Hung, D. L. (2005). Consistency, regularity, and frequency effects in naming Chinese characters. Language and Linguistics, 6, 75–107.Google Scholar

Leong, C. K., Cheng, P. W., & Mulcahy, R. (1987). Automatic processing of morphemic orthography by mature readers. Language and Speech, 30, 181–96.Google Scholar

Lewellen, M. J. Goldinger, S. D., Pisoni, D. B., & Greene, B. G. (1993). Lexical familiarity and processing efficiency: Individual differences in naming, lexical decision, and semantic categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 316–30.Google Scholar

Lexicon of Common Words in Contemporary Chinese Research Team. (2008). Lexicon of Common Words in Contemporary Chinese. Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar

Li, H., Peng, H., & Shu, H. (2006). A study on the emergence and development of Chinese orthographic awareness in preschool and school children. Psychological Development and Education, 22, 35–8. [李虹, 彭虹, & 舒华. (2006). 汉语儿童正字法意识的萌芽与发展. 心理发展与教育, 22, 35–8.]Google Scholar

Li, H., Shu, H., McBride-Chang, C., Liu, H., & Peng, H. (2012). Chinese children’s character recognition: Visuo-orthographic, phonological processing and morphological skills. Journal of Research in Reading, 35, 287–307.Google Scholar

Li, L., Wang, H. C., Castles, A., Hsieh, M. L., & Marinus, E. (2018). Phonetic radicals, not phonological coding systems, support orthographic learning via self-teaching in Chinese. Cognition, 176, 184–94.Google Scholar

Li, J., Fu, X., & Lin, Z. (2000). Study on the development of Chinese orthographic regularity in school children. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 32, 121–6. [李娟, 傅小兰, & 林仲贤. (2000). 学龄儿童汉语正字法意识发展的研究. 心理学报, 32, 121–6.]Google Scholar

Li, M. F., Gao, X. Y., Chou, T. L., & Wu, J. T. (2017). Neighborhood frequency effect in Chinese word recognition: Evidence from naming and lexical decision. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 46, 227–45.Google Scholar

Li, M. F., Lin, W. C., Chou, T. L., Yang, F. L., & Wu, J. T. (2015). The role of orthographic neighborhood size effects in Chinese word recognition. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 44, 219–36.Google Scholar

Li, Q., Bi, H., Wei, T., & Chen, B. (2011). Orthographic neighborhood size effect in Chinese character naming: Orthographic and phonological activations. Acta Psychologica, 136, 35–41.Google Scholar

Li, W., Anderson, R. C., Nagy, W., & Zhang, H. (2002). Facets of metalinguistic awareness that contribute to Chinese literacy. In Wenling, L., Gaffney, J. S., & Packard, J. L. (eds.) Chinese Children’s Reading Acquisition. Boston, MA: Springer, 87–106.Google Scholar

Li, X., Bicknell, K., Liu, P., Wei, W., & Rayner, K. (2014). Reading is fundamentally similar across disparate writing systems: A systematic characterization of how words and characters influence eye movements in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 895–913.Google Scholar

Li, X., Gu, J., Liu, P., & Rayner, K. (2013). The advantage of word-based processing in Chinese reading: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 879–89.Google Scholar

Li, X., Liu, P., & Rayner, K. (2011). Eye movement guidance in Chinese reading: Is there a preferred viewing location? Vision Research, 51, 1146–56.Google Scholar

Li, X., & Pollatsek, A. (2011). Word knowledge influences character perception. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 833–9.Google Scholar

Li, X. & Pollatsek, A. (2020). An integrated model of word processing and eye-movement control during Chinese reading. Psychological Review, 127 (6), 1139–62.Google Scholar

Li, X., Rayner, K., & Cave, K. R. (2009). On the segmentation of Chinese words during reading. Cognitive Psychology, 58, 525–52.Google Scholar

Li, Y., & Bi, H. Y. (2022). Comparative research on neural dysfunction in children with dyslexia under different writing systems: A meta-analysis study. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 137, 104650.Google Scholar

Liao, S., Yu, L., Reichle, E. D., & Kruger, J. L. (2021). Using eye movements to study the reading of subtitles in video. Scientific Studies of Reading, 25, 417–35.Google Scholar

Lin, D., McBride-Chang, C., Shu, H., Zhang, Y., Li, H., Zhang, J., et al. (2010). Small wins big: Analytic Pinyin skills promote Chinese word reading. Psychological Science, 21, 1117–22.Google Scholar

Liu, I. M., Wu, J. T., & Chou, T. L. (1996). Encoding operation and transcoding as the major loci of the frequency effect. Cognition, 59, 149–68.Google Scholar

Liu, P., Li, W, Lin, N. & Li, X. (2013). Do Chinese readers follow the national standard rules for word segmentation during reading? PLOS ONE, 8, e55440.Google Scholar

Liu, Y., Dunlap, S., Fiez, J., & Perfetti, C. (2007). Evidence for neural accommodation to a writing system following learning. Human Brain Mapping, 28, 1223–34.Google Scholar

Liu, Y. P., Guo, S., Yu, L., & Reichle, E. D. (2018). Word predictability affects saccade length in Chinese reading: An evaluation of the dynamic-adjustment model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 1891–9.Google Scholar

Liu, Y. P., Huang, R., Gao, D., & Reichle, E. D. (2017). Further tests of a dynamic-adjustment account of saccade targeting during the reading of Chinese. Cognitive Science, 41, 1264–87.Google Scholar

Liu, Y. P., Reichle, E. D., & Li, X. (2015). Parafoveal processing affects outgoing saccade length during the reading of Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41, 1229–36.Google Scholar

Liu, Y. P., Reichle, E. D., & Li, X. (2016). The effect of word frequency and parafoveal preview on saccade length during the reading of Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42, 1008–25.Google Scholar

Liu, Y. P., Yu, L., Fu, L., Li, W., Duan, Z., & Reichle, E. D. (2019). The effects of parafoveal word frequency and segmentation on saccade targeting during Chinese reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26, 1367–76.Google Scholar

Liu, Y. P., Yu, L., & Reichle, E. D. (2019). The influence of parafoveal preview, character transposition, and word frequency on saccadic targeting in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 45, 537–52.Google Scholar

Liu, Y. P., Yu, L., & Reichle, E. D. (2023). Towards a model of eye-movement control in Chinese reading. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

Liu, Y. Y., Shu, H., & Li, P. (2007). Word naming and psycholinguistic norms: Chinese. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 192–8.Google Scholar

Liu, Z., Tong, W., Zhang, Z., & Zhao, Y. (2020). Predictability impacts word and character processing in Chinese reading: Evidence from eye movements. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 52, 1031–47. [刘志方, 仝文, 张智君, & 赵亚军. (2020). 语境预测性对阅读中字词加工过程的影响: 眼动证据. 心理学报, 52, 1031–47.]Google Scholar

Liversedge, S. P., Drieghe, D., Li, X., Yan, G., Bai, X., & Hyönä, J. (2016). Universality in eye movements and reading: A trilingual investigation. Cognition, 147, 1–20.Google Scholar

Lo, L. Y., Yeung, P. S., Ho, C. S. H., Chan, D. W. O., & Chung, K. (2016). The role of stroke knowledge in reading and spelling in Chinese. Journal of Research in Reading, 39, 367–88.Google Scholar

Logothetis, N. K. (2003). The underpinnings of the BOLD functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging signal. The Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 3963–71.Google Scholar

Luo, Y., Wang, P., Li, X., Shi, Y., Chen, M., Wang, P., Hu, S., & Luo, Y. (2010). The effect of character’s whole recognition on the processing of components in the processes of Chinese characters. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 42, 683–94. [罗艳琳, 王鹏, 李秀军, 石雅琪, 陈墨, 王培培, 胡斯秀, & 罗跃嘉. (2010). 汉字认知过程中整字对部件的影响. 心理学报, 42, 683–94.]Google Scholar

Ma, G., Li, X., & Rayner, K. (2014). Word segmentation of overlapping ambiguous strings during Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 1046–59.Google Scholar

Ma, G., Li, X., & Rayner, K. (2015). Readers extract character frequency information from nonfixated-target word at long pretarget fixations during Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41, 1409–19.Google Scholar

MacDonald, M. C., Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). Working memory constraints on the processing of syntactic ambiguity. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 56–98.Google Scholar

MacKay, D. G. (1978). Derivational rules and the internal lexicon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 61–71.Google Scholar

Makita, K. (1974). Reading disability and the writing system. In Merritt, J. E. (eds.) New Horizons in Reading: Proceedings of the Fifth International Reading Association World Congress on Reading, Vienna, Austria, August 12–14. Newark, NJ: International Reading Association, 250–4.Google Scholar

Manis, F. R., Seidenberg, M. S., Doi, L. M., McBride-Chang, C., & Petersen, A. (1996). On the bases of two subtypes of development dyslexia. Cognition, 58, 157–95.Google Scholar

Marcel, A. J. (1983). Conscious and unconscious perception: Experiments on visual masking and word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 197–237.Google Scholar

Masson, M. E. J., & Freedman, L. (1990). Fluent identification of repeated words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 355–73.Google Scholar

Matin, E. (1974). Saccadic suppression: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 899–917.Google Scholar

Mattingly, I. G., & Xu, Y. (1994). Word superiority in Chinese. Advances in the Study of Chinese Language Processing, 1, 101–11.Google Scholar

McBride, C. A. (2016). Is Chinese special? Four aspects of Chinese literacy acquisition that might distinguish learning Chinese from learning alphabetic orthographies. Educational Psychology Review, 28 (3), 523–49.Google Scholar

McBride, C., & Wang, Y. (2015). Learning to read Chinese: Universal and unique cognitive cores. Child Development Perspectives, 9, 196–200.Google Scholar

McBride, C., Wang, Y., & Cheang, L. M. L. (2018). Dyslexia in Chinese. Current Developmental Disorders Reports, 5, 217–25.Google Scholar

McBride-Chang, C. (2004). Children’s Literacy Development. London: Arnold.Google Scholar

McBride-Chang, C., Bialystok, E., Chong, K. K., & Li, Y. (2004). Levels of phonological awareness in three cultures. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 89, 93–111.Google Scholar

McBride-Chang, C., Chung, K. K., & Tong, X. (2011). Copying skills in relation to word reading and writing in Chinese children with and without dyslexia. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 110, 422–33.Google Scholar

McBride-Chang, C., & Ho, C. S. H. (2000). Developmental issues in Chinese children’s character acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 50–5.Google Scholar

McBride-Chang, C., Shu, H., Zhou, A., Wat, C. P., & Wagner, R. K. (2003). Morphological awareness uniquely predicts young children’s Chinese character recognition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 743–51.Google Scholar

McBride-Chang, C., Tong, X., Shu, H., Wong, A. M. Y., Leung, K. W., & Tardif, T. (2008). Syllable, phoneme, and tone: Psycholinguistic units in early Chinese and English word recognition. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 171–94.Google Scholar

McCandliss, B. D., Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2003). The visual word form area: Expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 293–9.Google Scholar

McClelland, J. L. & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, 375–407.Google Scholar

McConkie, G. W., Kerr, P. W., Reddix, M. D., & Zola, D. (1988). Eye movement control during reading: I. The location of initial eye fixations in words. Vision Research, 28, 1107–18.Google Scholar

McConkie, G. W., Kerr, P. W., Reddix, M. D., Zola, D., Jacobs, A. M. (1989). Eye movement control during reading: II. Frequency of refixating a word. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 245–53.Google Scholar

McConkie, G. W., & Rayner, K. (1975). The span of the effective stimulus during a fixation in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 17, 578–86.Google Scholar

McConkie, G. W., & Rayner, K. (1976). What guides a reader’s eye movements? Vision Research, 16, 829–37.Google Scholar

McConkie, G. W., & Zola, D. (1979). Is visual information integrated across successive fixations in reading? Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 221–4.Google Scholar

McNamara, T. P. (2005). Semantic Priming: Perspectives from Memory and Word Recognition. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

McCormack, M. (2016). Solar Bones. Dublin: Tramp Press.Google Scholar

McDonald, S. A., Carpenter, R. H. S., & Shillcock, R. C. (2005). An anatomically constrained, stochastic model of eye movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 112, 814–40.Google Scholar

Meyer, D. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90, 227–34.Google Scholar

Miao, X., & Sang, B. (1991). A further study of the semantic memory of Chinese words. Journal of Psychological Science, 1, 8–11. [缪小春, & 桑标. (1991). 汉语词汇语义记忆的再研究. 心理科学, 1, 8–11.]Google Scholar

Miellet, S., O’Donnell, P. J., & Sereno, S. C. (2009). Parafoveal magnification: Visual acuity does not modulate the perceptual span in reading. Psychological Science, 20, 721–8.Google Scholar

Miikkulainen, R. (1997). Dyslexic and category-specific aphasic impairments in a self-organizing feature map model of the lexicon. Brain and Language, 59, 334–66.Google Scholar

Modern Chinese Frequency Dictionary. (1986). Beijing: Beijing Language and Culture University Press. [现代汉语频率词典. (1986). 北京:北京语言大学出版社.]Google Scholar

Mok, L. W. (2009). Word-superiority effect as a function of semantic transparency of Chinese bimorphemic compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 1039–81.Google Scholar

Morrison, C. M., & Ellis, A. W. (1995). Roles of word frequency and age of acquisition in word naming and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 116–33.Google Scholar

Morrison, C. M., & Ellis, A. W. (2000). Real age of acquisition effects in word naming and lexical decision. British Journal of Psychology, 91, 167–80.Google Scholar

Morton, J. (1969). Interaction of information in word recognition. Psychological Review, 76, 165–78.Google Scholar

Nation, K. (2009). Form-meaning links in the development of visual word recognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 364, 3665–74.Google Scholar

Nation, K. (2017). Nurturing a lexical legacy: Reading experience is critical for the development of word reading skill. npj Science of Learning, 2, 1–4.Google Scholar

Nation, K., Angell, P., & Castles, A. (2007). Orthographic learning via self-teaching in children learning to read English: Effects of exposure, durability, and context. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 96, 71–84.Google Scholar

Neely, J. H. (1976). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Evidence for facilitatory and inhibitory processes. Memory & Cognition, 4, 648–54.Google Scholar

Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles if inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106, 226–54.Google Scholar

Neely, J. H. (1991). Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. In Besner, D. & Humphreys, G. W. (eds.), Basic Processes in Reading: Visual Word Recognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 264–336.Google Scholar

Nelson, J., Liu, Y., Fiez, J., & Perfetti, C. A. (2009). Assimilation and accommodation patterns in ventral occipitotemporal context in learning a second writing system. Human Brain Mapping, 30, 810–20.Google Scholar

Norman, J. (1988). Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Normann, R. A., & Guillory, K. S. (2002). Anatomy and physiology of the retina. In Hung, G. K. & Ciuffreda, K. J. (eds.), Models of the Visual System. Boston, MA: Springer, 109–45.Google Scholar

Norris, D. (1994). A quantitative multiple-levels model of reading aloud. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1212–32.Google Scholar

Norris, D., & Kinoshita, S. (2012). Reading through a noisy channel: Why there’s nothing special about the perception of orthography. Psychological Review, 119, 517–45.Google Scholar

Nuthmann, A., Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R. (2005). Mislocated fixations during reading and the inverted optimal viewing position effect. Vision Research, 45, 2201–17.Google Scholar

O’Regan, J. K. (1981). The ‘convenient viewing location’ hypothesis. In Fisher, D. F., Monty, R. A., & Senders, J. W. (eds.), Eye Movements: Cognition and Visual Perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 289–98.Google Scholar

O’Regan, J. K. (1992). Optimal view position in words and the strategy-tactics model of eye movements in reading. In Rayner, K. (ed.), Eye Movements and Visual Cognition: Scene Perception and Reading. New York: Springer, 333–54.Google Scholar

O’Regan, J. K., & Jacobs, A. M. (1992). Optimal viewing position effect in word recognition: A challenge to current theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 185–97.Google Scholar

O’Regan, J. K., & Lévy-Schoen, A. (1987). Eye-movement strategy and tactics in word recognition and reading. In Coltheart, M. (ed.), Attention and Performance, XII. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 363–84.Google Scholar

O’Regan, J. K., Lévy-Schoen, A., Pynte, J., & Brugaillere, B. (1984). Convenient fixation location within isolated words of different length and structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 250–7.Google Scholar

Ozen, R., West, R. L., & Kelly, M. A. (2022). Minvera-Q: A multiple-trace memory system for reinforcement learning. Proceedings of the 44th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar

Packard, J. L. (2015). Morphology: Morphemes in Chinese. In Wang, W. S., & Sun, C. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Chinese Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 262–73.Google Scholar

Packard, J. L., Chen, X., Li, W., Wu, X., Gaffney, J. S., Li, H., & Anderson, R. C. (2006). Explicit instruction in orthographic structure and word morphology helps Chinese children learn to write characters. Reading and Writing, 19, 457–87.Google Scholar

Palmer, K. (2009). What can MEG neuroimaging tell us about reading? Journal of Neurolinguistics, 22, 266–80.Google Scholar

Peng, D., Liu, Y., & Wang, C. (1999). How is access representation organized? The relation of polymorphemic words and their morphemes in Chinese. In Wang, J., Inhoff, A. W., & Chen, H. C. (eds.), Reading Chinese Script: A Cognitive Analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 65–89.Google Scholar

Peng, D., & Wang, C. (1997). Basic processing unit of Chinese character recognition: Evidence from stroke number effect and radical number effect. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 29, 8–16. [彭聃龄, & 王春茂. (1997), 笔画数效应和部件数效应. 心理学报, 29, 8–16.]Google Scholar

Peng, P., Wang, C., Tao, S., & Sun, C. (2017). The deficit profiles of Chinese children with reading difficulties: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 29, 513–64.Google Scholar

Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003). Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter similarity effects in masked associative priming. Memory & Cognition, 31, 829–41.Google Scholar

Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2004). Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 231–46.Google Scholar

Perea, M., Rosa, E., & Gomez, C. (2005). The frequency effect for pseudo-words in the lexical decision task. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 301–14.Google Scholar

Perfetti, C. A. (2005). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 357–83.Google Scholar

Perfetti, C. A., & Liu, Y. (2006). Reading Chinese characters: Orthography, phonology, meaning, and the Lexical Constituency Model. In Li, P., Tan, L. H., Bates, E., & Tzeng, O. J. L. (eds.), The Handbook of East Asian Psycholinguistics, Volume 1: Chinese. New York: Cambridge University Press, 225–36.Google Scholar

Perfetti, C. A., Liu, Y., Fiez, J. Nelson, J., Bolger, D. J., & Tan, L. H. (2007). Reading in two writing systems: Accommodation and assimilation of the brain’s reading network. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10, 131–46.Google Scholar

Perfetti, C. A., Liu, Y., & Tan, L. H. (2005). The lexical constituency model: Some implications of research on Chinese for general theories of reading. Psychological Review, 112, 43–59.Google Scholar

Perfetti, C. A., & Tan, L. H. (1998). The time course of graphic, phonological, and semantic activation in Chinese character identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 101–18.Google Scholar

Perfetti, C. A., & Tan, L. H. (1999). The constituency model of Chinese word identification. In Wang, J., Inhoff, A. W., & Chen, H. C. (eds.), Reading Chinese Script: A Cognitive Analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 115–34.Google Scholar

Perfetti, C. A., & Tan, L. H. (2013). Write to read: the brain’s universal reading and writing network. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 56–7.Google Scholar

Perfetti, C. A., & Zhang, S. (1995). Very early phonological activation in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 24–33.Google Scholar

Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2007). Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: The CDP+ model of reading aloud. Psychological Review, 114, 273–315.Google Scholar

Peterson, R. L., & Pennington, B. F. (2012). Developmental dyslexia. The Lancet, 379, 1997–2007.Google Scholar

Pinker, S. (2015). The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language. London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Plaut, D. C. (2005). Connectionist approaches to reading. In Snowling, M., Hulme, C., & S. Seidenberg, M. (eds.), The Science of Reading: A Handbook. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 24–38.Google Scholar

Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., & Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, 56–115.Google Scholar

Pollatsek, A., Bolozky, S., Well, A. D., & Rayner, K. (1981). Asymmetries in the perceptual span for Israeli readers. Brain and Language, 14, 174–80.Google Scholar

Pollatsek, A., Reichle, E. D., & Rayner, K. (2006). Serial processing is consistent with the time course of linguistic information extraction from consecutive words during eye fixations in reading: A response to Inhoff, Eiter, and Radach (2005). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1485–9.Google Scholar

Pollatsek, A., & Treiman, R. (2015). The Oxford Handbook of Reading. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Pritchard, S. C., Coltheart, M., Marinus, E., & Castles, A. (2018). A computational model of the self-teaching hypothesis based on the dual-route cascaded model of reading. Cognitive Science, 42, 722–70.Google Scholar

Pugh, K. R., Shaywitz, B. A., Shaywitz, S. E., Constable, R. T., Skudlarski, P., Fulbright, R. K., et al. (1996). Cerebral organization of component processes in reading. Brain, 119, 1221–38.Google Scholar

Qian, Y., Song, Y. W., Zhao, J., & Bi, H. Y. (2015). The developmental trend of orthographic awareness in Chinese preschoolers. Reading and Writing, 28, 571–86.Google Scholar

Raichle, M. E. (1983). Positron emission tomography. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 6, 249–67.Google Scholar

Rastle, K., & Davis, M. (2002). On the complexities of measuring naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 307–14.Google Scholar

Rayner, K. (1975). The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 65–81.Google Scholar

Rayner, K. (1979). Eye movements and cognitive psychology: On-line computer approaches to studying visual information processing. Behavior Research Methods & Instruments, 11, 164–71.Google Scholar

Rayner, K. (1986). Eye movements and the perceptual span in beginning and skilled readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 41, 211–36.Google Scholar

Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372–422.Google Scholar

Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1457–506.Google Scholar

Rayner, K. (2014). The gaze-contingent moving window in reading: Development and review. Visual Cognition, 22, 242–58.Google Scholar

Rayner, K., Ashby, J., Pollatsek, A., & Reichle, E. D. (2004). The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: Implications for the E-Z Reader model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, 720–32.Google Scholar

Rayner, K., & Bertera, J. J. (1979). Reading without a fovea. Science, 206, 468–9.Google Scholar

Rayner, K., Carlson, M., & Frazier, L. (1983). The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing: Eye movements in the analysis of semantically biased sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 22, 358–74.Google Scholar

Rayner, K., & Duffy, S. A. (1986). Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory & Cognition, 14, 191–201.Google Scholar

Rayner, K., Foorman, B. R., Perfetti, C. A., Pesetsky, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2001). How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2, 31–74.Google Scholar

Rayner, K., Li, X., Juhasz, B. J., & Yan, G. (2005). The effect of word predictability on eye movements on Chinese readers. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 1089–93.Google Scholar

Rayner, K., Li, X., & Pollatsek, A. (2007). Extending the E-Z Reader model of eye movement control to Chinese readers. Cognitive Science, 31, 1021–33.Google Scholar

Rayner, K., McConkie, G. W., & Zola, D. (1980). Integrating information across eye movements. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 206–26.Google Scholar

Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1981). Eye movement control during reading: Evidence for direct control. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 351–73.Google Scholar

Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1989). The Psychology of Reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., Ashby, J., & Clifton, C., Jr. (2012). The Psychology of Reading. Second edition. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Rayner, K., Sereno, S. C., & Raney, G. E. (1996). Eye movement control in reading: A comparison of two types of models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1188–1200.Google Scholar

Rayner, K., Schotter, E. R., Masson, M. E. J., Potter, M. C., & Treiman, R. (2016). So much to read, so little time: How do we read, and can speed reading help? Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 17, 4–34.Google Scholar

Rayner, K., & Well, A. D. (1986). Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 504–09.Google Scholar

Rayner, K., Well, A. D., Pollatsek, A., & Bertera, J. H. (1982). The availability of useful information to the right of fixation in reading. Perception & Psychophysics, 31, 537–50.Google Scholar

Reicher, G. M. (1969). Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 274–80.Google Scholar

Reichle, E. D. (2006). Computational models of eye-movement control during reading: Theories of the “eye-mind” link. Cognitive Systems Research, 7, 2–3.Google Scholar

Reichle, E. D. (2011). Serial attention models of reading. In Liversedge, S. P., Gilchrist, I. D., & Everling, S. (eds.), Oxford Handbook on Eye Movements. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 767–86.Google Scholar

Reichle, E. D. (2021). Computational Models of Reading: A handbook. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Reichle, E. D., & Drieghe, D. (2015). Using E-Z Reader to examine the consequences of fixation-location measurement error. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41, 262–70.Google Scholar

Reichle, E. D., Liversedge, S. P., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2009). Encoding multiple words simultaneously in reading is implausible. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 115–19.Google Scholar

Reichle, E. D., & Perfetti, C. A. (2003). Morphology in word identification: A word-experience model that accounts for morpheme frequency effects. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7, 219–37.Google Scholar

Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., Fisher, D. L., & Rayner, K. (1998). Toward a model of eye-movement control in reading. Psychological Review, 105, 125–57.Google Scholar

Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2006). E-Z Reader: A cognitive-control, serial-attention model of eye-movement control during reading. Cognitive Systems Research, 7, 4–22.Google Scholar

Reichle, E. D., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2012). Using E-Z Reader to simulate eye movements in non-reading tasks: A unified framework for understanding the eye-mind link. Psychological Review, 119, 155–85.Google Scholar

Reichle, E. D., & Reingold, E. M. (2013). Neurophysiological constraints on the eye-mind link. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 361. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00361.Google Scholar

Reichle, E. D., & Schotter, E. R. (2020). A computational analysis of the constraints on parallel word identification. In CogSci 2020: Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society, 164–70.Google Scholar

Reichle, E. D., Veldre, A., Yu, L., & Andrews, S. (2022). A neural implementation of MINERVA 2. In CogSci2022: Proceedings of the 44th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society, 2278–84.Google Scholar

Reichle, E. D., & Yu, L. (2018). Models of Chinese reading: Review and analysis. Cognitive Science, 42, 1154–65.Google Scholar

Reilly, R. (1993). A connectionist framework for modeling eye-movement control in reading. In d’Ydewalle, G & Van Rensbergen, J. (eds.), Perception and Cognition: Advances in Eye Movement Research. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 193–212.Google Scholar

Reilly, R., Aranyanak, I., Yu, L., Yan, G., & Tang, S. (2011). Eye movement control in reading Thai and Chinese. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 9, 35–44.Google Scholar

Reilly, R., & Radach, R. (2003). Foundations of an interactive activation model of eye movement control in reading. In Hyönä, J., Radach, R. & Deubel, H. (eds.), The Mind’s Eyes: Cognitive and Applied Aspects of Oculomotor Research. Oxford: Elsevier, 429–56.Google Scholar

Reilly, R., & Radach, R. (2006). Some empirical tests of an interactive activation model of eye movement control in reading. Cognitive Systems Research, 7, 34–55.Google Scholar

Reingold, E. M., Reichle, E. D., Glaholt, M. G., & Sheridan, H. (2012). Direct lexical control of eye movements in reading: Evidence from survival analysis of fixation durations. Cognitive Psychology, 65, 177–206.Google Scholar

Ren, P., Xu, F., & Zhang, R. (2006). Effects of Pinyin in learning on development of phonological awareness. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 38, 41–6. [任萍, 徐芬, & 张瑞平. (2006). 拼音学习对幼儿语音意识发展的影响, 心理学报, 38, 41–6.]Google Scholar

Rips, L. J., Shoben, E. J., & Smith, E. E. (1973). Semantic distance and the verification of semantic relations. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 1–20.Google Scholar

Robinson, A. (1995). The Story of Writing: Alphabets, Hieroglyphs, & Pictograms. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar

Rosch, E. (1973). Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 4, 328–350.Google Scholar

Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573–605.Google Scholar

Rossmeissl, P. G., & Theios, J. (1982). Identification and pronunciation effects in a verbal reaction time task for words, pseudo-words, and letters. Memory & Cognition, 10, 443–50.Google Scholar

Rueckl, J. G., Paz-Alonso, P. M., Molfese, P. J., Kuo, W.-J., Bick, A., Frost, S. J., et al. (2015). Universal brain signature of proficient reading: Evidence from four contrasting languages. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 11510–15.Google Scholar

Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1982). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychological Review, 89, 60–94.Google Scholar

Sagan, C. (1980). Cosmos. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Salvucci, D. D. (2001). An integrated model of eye movements and visual encoding. Cognitive Systems Research, 1, 201–20.Google Scholar

Scarborough, D. L., Cortese, C., & Scarborough, H. S. (1977). Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 1–17.Google Scholar

Schad, D. J., & Engbert, R. (2012). The zoom lens of attention: Simulating shuffled versus normal text reading using the SWIFT model. Visual Cognition, 20, 391–421.Google Scholar

Schilling, H. E. H., Rayner, K., & Chumbley, J. I. (1998). Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: Word frequency effects and individual differences. Memory & Cognition, 26, 1270–81.Google Scholar

Schoonbaert, S., & Grainger, J. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 333–67.Google Scholar

Schotter, E. R. (2013). Synonyms provide semantic preview benefit in English. Journal of Memory and Language, 69, 619–33.Google Scholar

Sears, C. R., Hino, Y., & Lupker, S. J. (1995). Neighborhood size and neighborhood frequency effects in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 876–900.Google Scholar

Segbers, J., & Schroeder, S. (2017). How many words do children know? A corpus-based estimation of children’s total vocabulary size. Language Testing, 34, 297–320.Google Scholar

Seidenberg, M. S. (2017). Language at the Speed of Sight: How We Read, Why So Many Can’t, and What Can Be Done about It. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523–68.Google Scholar

Seyfarth, R. M., Cheney, D. L., & Marler, P. (1980). Monkey responses to three different alarm calls: Evidence of predator classification and semantic communication. Science, 210, 801–3.Google Scholar

Share, D. L. (2008). On the Anglocentricities of current reding research and practice: The perils of overreliance on an “outlier” orthography. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 584–615.Google Scholar

Share, D. L. (2021). Is the science of reading just the science of reading English?. Reading Research Quarterly, 56, S391–S402.Google Scholar

Shen, D., & Forster, K. (1999). Masked phonological priming in reading Chinese words depends on the task. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 429–60.Google Scholar

Shen, M., Pan, S., & Li, Z. (1997). The effects of global perception of Chinese character morphology on recognition of its radical. Chinese Journal or Applied Psychology, 3, 47−51. [沈模卫, 潘善会, 李忠平. (1997). 整体字形对部件识别的影响. 应用心理学, 3, 47−51.]Google Scholar

Shen, W., & Li, X. (2012). The uniqueness of word superiority effect in Chinese reading. Chinese Science Bulletin, 57, 3414–20. [申薇, & 李兴珊. (2012). 中文阅读中词优效应的特异性. 科学通报, 57, 3414–20.]Google Scholar

Shillcock, R. C., & Monaghan, P. (2001). Connectionist model of surface dyslexia based on foveal splitting: Impaired pronunciation after only two half pints. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Edinburgh: LEA, 916–21.Google Scholar

Shu, H., & Anderson, R. C. (1997). Role of radical awareness in the character and word acquisition of Chinese children. Reading Research Quarterly, 32, 78–89.Google Scholar

Shu, H., & Anderson, R. C. (1999). Learning to read Chinese: The development of metalinguistic awareness. In Wang, J., Inhoff, A. W., & Chen, H. C. (eds.), Reading Chinese Script: A Cognitive Analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1–18.Google Scholar

Shu, H., & Liu, B. X. (1994). The role of pinyin in early reading for Chinese junior primary school children. Psychological Development and Education, 10, 11–15. [舒华, & 刘宝霞. (1994). 拼音在小学低年级儿童早期阅读中作用的研究. 心理发展与教育, 10, 11–15.]Google Scholar

Shu, H., McBride-Chang, C., Wu, S., & Liu, H. (2006). Understanding Chinese developmental dyslexia: Morphological awareness as a core cognitive construct. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 122–33.Google Scholar

Shu, H., Meng, X., Chen, X., Luan, H., & Cao, F. (2005). The subtypes of developmental dyslexia in Chinese: Evidence from three cases. Dyslexia, 11, 311–29.Google Scholar

Shu, H., Peng, H., & McBride-Chang, C. (2008). Phonological awareness in young Chinese children. Developmental Science, 11, 171–81.Google Scholar

Shu, H., & Zeng, H. (1996). Awareness of phonological cues in pronunciation of Chinese characters and its development. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 28, 160–5. [舒华, & 曾红梅. (1996). 儿童对汉字结构中语音线索的意识及其发展. 心理学报, 28, 160–5.]Google Scholar

Shu, H., & Zhang, H. (1987). The processing of pronouncing Chinese characters by proficient mature readers. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 3, 282–90. [舒华, & 张厚粲. (1987). 成年熟练读者的汉字读音加工过程. 心理学报, 3, 282–90.]Google Scholar

Shu, H., Zhou, X., & Wu, N. (2000). Utilizing phonological cues in Chinese characters: A developmental study. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 32, 164–9. [舒华, 周晓林, & 武宁宁. (2000). 儿童汉字读音声旁一致性意识的发展. 心理学报, 32, 164–9.]Google Scholar

Siok, W. T., & Fletcher, P. (2001). The role of phonological awareness and visual-orthographic skills in Chinese reading acquisition. Developmental Psychology, 37, 886–99.Google Scholar

Snell, J., & Grainger, J. (2019). Readers are parallel processors. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23, 537–46.Google Scholar

Snell, J., van Leipsig, S., Grainger, J., & Meeter, M. (2018). OB1-Reader: A model of word recognition and eye movements in text reading. Psychological Review, 125, 969–84.Google Scholar

Snowling, M. (1987). Dyslexia: A Cognitive Developmental Perspective. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Snowling, M. J., & Hulme, C. (2005). The Science of Reading: A Handbook. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Song, S., Georgiou, G. K., Su, M., & Hua, S. (2016). How well do phonological awareness and rapid automatized naming correlate with Chinese reading accuracy and fluency? A meta-analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 20, 99–123.Google Scholar

Song, S., Zhang, Y., Shu, H., Su, M., & McBride, C. (2020). Universal and specific predictors of Chinese children with dyslexia – Exploring the cognitive deficits and subtypes. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2904.Google Scholar

Song, X., Xu, X., Yang, X., Sun, G., & Cui, L. (2022). The influence of predictability, word frequency and stroke number on Chinese word recognition: An eye movement study. Journal of Psychological Science, 45, 1061–8. [宋悉妮, 徐晓晨, 杨秀莉, 孙桂苓, & 崔磊. (2022). 预期性、词频和笔画数对中文词汇识别影响的眼动研究. 心理科学, 45, 1061–8.]Google Scholar

Spencer, L. H., & Hanley, J. R. (2004). Learning a transparent orthography at five years old: Reading development of children during their first year of formal reading instruction in Wales. Journal of Research in Reading, 27, 1–14.Google Scholar

Spinks, J. A., Liu, Y., Perfetti, C. A., & Tan, L. H. (2000). Reading Chinese characters for meaning: The role of phonological information. Cognition, 76, B1–B11.Google Scholar

Spivey, M. J., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Syntactic ambiguity resolution in discourse: Modeling the effects of referential context and lexical frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 1521–43.Google Scholar

State Language Commission & Ministry of Education China. (2013). Standardized Common Chinese Character List.Google Scholar

Stevenson, H. W., Stigler, J. W., Lucker, G. W., Lee, S. Y., Hsu, C. C., & Kitamura, S. (1982). Reading disabilities: The case of Chinese, Japanese, and English. Child Development, 53 (5), 1164–81.Google Scholar

Stroop, J. R. (1935) Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18 (6), 643–62.Google Scholar

Sun, F., & Feng, D. (1999). Eye movements in reading Chinese and English text. In Wang, J., Inhoff, A. W., & Chen, H. C. (eds.), Reading Chinese Script: A Cognitive Analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 189–205.Google Scholar

Swinney, D. A., & Cutler, A. (1979). The access and processing of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 523–34.Google Scholar

Sze, W. P., Yap, M. J., & Rickard Liow, S. J. (2015). The role of lexical variables in the visual recognition of Chinese characters: A megastudy analysis. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68, 1541–70.Google Scholar

Taft, M. (1991). Reading and the Mental Lexicon. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Taft, M., & Chen, H. C. (1992). Judging homophony in Chinese: The influence of tones. In In Chen, H. C. & Tzeng, O. J. L. (eds.), Language Processing in Chinese. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 151–72.Google Scholar

Taft, M., & Krebs-Lazendic, L. (2013). The role of orthographic syllable structure in assigning letters to their position in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 68, 85–97.Google Scholar

Taft, M., & van Graan, F. (1998). Lack of phonological medication in a semantic categorization task. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 203–24.Google Scholar

Taft, M., & Zhu, X. (1997). Submorphemic processing in reading Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 761–75.Google Scholar

Taft, M., Zhu, X., & Peng, D. (1999). Positional specificity of radicals in Chinese character recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 498–519.Google Scholar

Tan, L. H., Hoosain, R., & Peng, D. L. (1995). Role of early presemantic phonological code in Chinese character identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 43–54.Google Scholar

Tan, L. H., Laird, A. R., Li, K., & Fox, P. T. (2005). Neuroanatomical correlates of phonological processing of Chinese characters and alphabetic words: A meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 25, 83–91.Google Scholar

Tan, L. H., Liu, H. L., Perfetti, C. A., Spinks, J. A., Fox, P. T., & Gao, J. H. (2001). The neural system underlying Chinese logographic reading. NeuroImage, 13, 836–46.Google Scholar

Tan, L. H., & Perfetti, C. A. (1998a). Phonological codes as early sources of constraint in Chinese word identification: A review of current discoveries and theoretical accounts. Reading and Writing, 10, 165–200.Google Scholar

Tan, L. H., & Perfetti, C. A. (1998b). Phonological activation in visual identification of Chinese two-character words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 382–93.Google Scholar

Tan, L. H., Spinks, J. A., Eden, G. F., Perfetti, C. A., & Siok, W. T. (2005). Reading depends on writing, in Chinese. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 8781–5.Google Scholar

Tan, L. H., Spinks, J. A., Gao, J. H., Liu, H. L., Perfetti, C. A., Xiong, J., Stofer, K. A., Pu, Y., Liu, Y., & Fox, P. T. (2000). Brain activation in the processing of Chinese characters and words. Human Brain Mapping, 10, 16–27.Google Scholar

Tang, S., & Wu, X. (2009). The early development of young children’s Chinese phonological awareness. Journal of Psychological Science, 32, 312–15. [唐珊, & 伍新春. (2009). 汉语儿童早期语音意识的发展. 心理科学, 32, 312–15.]Google Scholar

Taylor, J. S. H., Plunkett, K., & Nation, K. (2010). The influence of consistency, frequency, and semantics on learning to read: An artificial orthography paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 60–76.Google Scholar

Taylor, W. L. (1953). Cloze procedure: A new tool for measuring readability. Journalism Quarterly, 30, 415–33.Google Scholar

Tong, W., Liu, N., Fu, G., & Yan, G. (2014). The perceptual span in Chinese when reading sentence constructed by one-character words. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 12, 298–303. [仝文, 刘妮娜, 伏干, & 闫国利. (2014). 中文单字词句的阅读知觉广度. 心理与行为研究, 12, 298–303.]Google Scholar

Tong, W., Yu, X., Liu, Z., Zhu, X., & Qi, Q. (2022). Differences in contextual information utilization between fast and slow readers: The role of processing depth. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 20, 450–6. [仝文, 余雪, 刘志方, 朱星宇, & 齐琦. (2022). 快慢读者利用语境信息的差异：加工深度的作用. 心理与行为研究, 20, 450–6.]Google Scholar

Tong, X., & McBride-Chang, C. (2010). Developmental models of learning to read Chinese words. Developmental Psychology, 46, 1662–76.Google Scholar

Tong, X., McBride-Chang, C., Shu, H., & Wong, A. M. (2009). Morphological awareness, orthographic knowledge, and spelling errors: Keys to understanding early Chinese literacy acquisition. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13, 426–52.Google Scholar

Tong, X., Tong, X., & McBride-Chang, C. (2015). Tune in to the tone: Lexical tone identification is associated with vocabulary and word recognition abilities in young Chinese children. Language and Speech, 58, 441–58.Google Scholar

Treiman, R., & Cassar, M. (1996). Effects of morphology on children’s spelling of final consonant clusters. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63, 141–70.Google Scholar

Tsai, J. L., Kliegl, R., & Yan, M. (2012). Parafoveal semantic information extraction in traditional Chinese reading. Acta Psychologica, 141, 17–23.Google Scholar

Tsai, J. L., Lee, C. Y., Lin, Y. C., Tzeng, O. J., & Hung, D. L. (2006). Neighborhood size effects of Chinese words in lexical decision and reading. Language and Linguistics (Taipei), 7, 659–75.Google Scholar

Tsai, J. L., & McConkie, G. W. (2003). Where do Chinese readers send their eyes? In Hyönä, J., Radach, R., Deubel, H. (eds.), The Mind’s Eye: Cognitive and Applied Aspects of Eye Movement Research. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 159–76.Google Scholar

Tsang, Y. K., Huang, J., Lui, M., Xue, M., Chan, Y. W. F., Wang, S., & Chen, H. C. (2018). MELD-SCH: A megastudy of lexical decision in simplified Chinese. Behavior Research Methods, 50, 1763–77.Google Scholar

Tse, C. S., & Yap, M. J. (2018). The role of lexical variables in the visual recognition of two-character Chinese compound words: A megastudy analysis. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71, 2022–38.Google Scholar

Tse, C. S., Yap, M. J., Chan, Y. L., Sze, W. P., Shaoul, C., & Lin, D. (2017). The Chinese Lexicon Project: A megastudy of lexical decision performance for 25,000+ traditional Chinese two-character compound words. Behavior Research Methods, 49, 1503–19.Google Scholar

Turner, J. E., Valentine, T., & Ellis, A. W. (1998). Contrasting effects of age of acquisition and word frequency on auditory and visual lexical decision. Memory & Cognition, 26, 1282–91.Google Scholar

Van Orden, G. C. (1987). A ROWS is a ROSE: Spelling, sound, and reading. Memory & Cognition, 15, 181–98.Google Scholar

Van Orden, G. O., Pennington, B. F., & Stone, G. O. (1990). Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. Psychological Review, 97, 488–522.Google Scholar

Veldre, A., & Andrews, S. (2016). Is semantic preview benefit due to relatedness or plausibility? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42, 939–52.Google Scholar

Veldre, A., Reichle, E. D., Yu, L., & Andrews, S. (2020). Towards a complete model of reading: Simulating lexical decision, word naming, and sentence reading with Über-Reader. In CogSci 2020: Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society, 151–7.Google Scholar

Veldre, A., Reichle, E. D., Yu, L., & Andrews, S. (2023). Understanding the visual constraints on lexical processing: New empirical and simulation results. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 152 (3), 693–722.Google Scholar

Vinckier, F., Dehaene, S., Jobert, A., Dubus, J. P., Sigman, M., & Cohen, L. (2007). Hierarchical coding of letter strings in the ventral stream: Dissecting the inner organization of the visual word-form system. Neuron, 55, 143–55.Google Scholar

Vitu, F., McConkie, G. W., Kerr, P., & O’Regan, J. K. (2001). Fixation location effects on fixation durations during reading: An inverted optimal viewing position effect. Vision Research, 41, 3513–33.Google Scholar

Wang, C., & Peng, D. (1999). Effects of semantic transparency and surface frequency on Chinese word processing. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 31, 266–73. [王春茂, & 彭聃龄. (1999). 合成词加工中的词频、词素频率及语义透明度. 心理学报, 31, 266–73.]Google Scholar

Wang, C., & Peng, D. (2000). The role of semantic transparencies in the processing of compound words. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 32, 127–32. [王春茂, & 彭聃龄. (2000). 重复启动作业中词的语义透明度的作用. 心理学报, 32, 127–32.]Google Scholar

Wang, J., Tian, J., Han, W., Liversedge, S. P., & Paterson, K. B. (2014). Inhibitory stroke neighbour priming in character recognition and reading in Chinese. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 2149–71.Google Scholar

Wang, L., & Yan, G. (2020). The interference effect of masking materials in Chinese reading: An eye movement study. Psychological Exploration, 40, 318–24. [王丽红, & 闫国利. (2020). 阅读知觉广度研究中掩蔽刺激干扰效应的眼动研究. 心理学探新, 40, 318–24.]Google Scholar

Wang, L., & Yan, G. (2021). The perceptual span for two-character compound-word sentence in Chinese: An eye movement study. Psychological Exploration, 41, 123–30. [王丽红, & 闫国利. (2021). 汉语双字词句知觉广度的眼动研究. 心理学探新, 41, 123–30.]Google Scholar

Wang, L. C., & Yang, H. M. (2014). Classifying Chinese children with dyslexia by dual-route and triangle models of Chinese reading. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35, 2702–13.Google Scholar

Wang, W. S. Y. (1973). The Chinese language. Scientific American, 228, 50–63.Google Scholar

Warrington, K. L., Wu, S. H., Reichle, E. D., Sheridan, H., Peterson, K. B., & White, S. J. (2023). Eye movements during reading and skimming: Effects of word length and frequency. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar

Wegener, S., Wang, H. C., Beyersmann, E., Reichle, E. D., Nation, K., & Castles, A. (2023). The effect of spacing versus massing on orthographic learning. Reading Research Quarterly. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ey76v Google Scholar

Wei, W., Li, X., & Pollatsek, A. (2013). Word properties of a fixated region affect outgoing saccade length. Vision Research, 80, 1–6.Google Scholar

West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (1982). Source of inhibition in experiments on the effect of sentence context on word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 385–99.Google Scholar

Wheeler, D. D. (1970). Processes in word recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 1, 59–85.Google Scholar

White, S. J., & Liversedge, S. P. (2006). Foveal processing difficulty does not modulate non-foveal orthographic influences on fixation positions. Vision Research, 46, 426–37.Google Scholar

White, S. J., Rayner, K., & Liversedge, S. P. (2005). The influence of parafoveal word length and contextual constraint on fixation durations and word skipping in reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 466–71.Google Scholar

Whitlow, J. W. (1990). Differential sensitivity of perceptual identification for words and pseudo-words to test expectations: Implications for the locus of word frequency effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 837–51.Google Scholar

Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 221–43.Google Scholar

Whitney, C., & Cornelissen, P. (2008). SERIOL reading. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 143–64.Google Scholar

Wolf, M. (2008). Proust and the Squid: The Story and Science of the Reading Brain. London: Icon.Google Scholar

Wu, J., Slattery, T. J., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (2008). Word segmentation in Chinese reading. In Rayner, K., Shen, D., Bai, X., & Yan, G. (eds.), Cognitive and Cultural Influences on Eye Movements. Tianjin: Tianjin People’s Publishing House, 303–14.Google Scholar

Wu, J. T., Yang, F. L., & Lin, W. C. (2013). Beyond phonology matters in character recognition. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 55, 289–318. [吳瑞屯, 楊馥菱, & 林維駿. (2013). 跨越單字辨識歷程研究裡的語音處理議題. 中華心理學刊, 55, 289–318.]Google Scholar

Wu, X., Anderson, R. C., Li, W., Wu, X., Li, H., Zhang, J., et al. (2009). Morphological awareness and Chinese children’s literacy development: An intervention study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13, 26–52.Google Scholar

Wurtz, R. H., & Kandel, E. R. (1991). Central visual pathways. In Kandel, E. R., Schwartz, J. H., & Jessell, T. M. (eds.), Principles of Neural Science. New York: McGraw-Hill, 523–47.Google Scholar

Xing, H., Shu, H., & Li, P. (2002). A self-organizing connectionist model of character acquisition in Chinese. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 24, 950–5.Google Scholar

Xing, H., Shu, H., & Li, P. (2004). The acquisition of Chinese characters: Corpus analyses and connectionist simulations. Journal of Cognitive Science, 5, 1–49.Google Scholar

Xiong, J., Yu, L., Veldre, A., Reichle, E. D., & Andrews, S. (2023). A multi-task comparison of word- and character-frequency effects in Chinese reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 49, 793–811.Google Scholar

Xu, Y., Pollatsek, A., & Potter, M. C. (1999). The activation of phonology during silent Chinese word reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 838–57.Google Scholar

Yan, G., Fu, G., & Bai, X. (2008). The perceptual span and eye movements in reading Chinese materials of different degrees of difficulty. Journal of Psychological Science, 31, 1287–90. [闫国利, 伏干, & 白学军. (2008). 不同难度阅读材料对阅读知觉广度影响的眼动研究. 心理科学, 31, 1287–90.]Google Scholar

Yan, G., Sun, S., Cui, L., & Bai, X. (2013). Homophone density effect in naming task and sentence reading. Journal of Psychological Science, 36, 776–80. [闫国利, 孙莎莎, 崔磊, & 白学军. (2013). 汉字命名与句子阅读中的同音字密度效应. 心理科学, 36, 776–80.]Google Scholar

Yan, G., Tian, H., Bai, X., & Rayner, K. (2006). The effect of word and character frequency on the eye movements of Chinese readers. British Journal of Psychology, 97, 259–68.Google Scholar

Yan, G., Zhang, Q., & Bai, X. (2013). Study on the influencing factors of perceptual span in Chinese reading. Psychological Development and Education, 29, 121–30. [闫国利, 张巧明, & 白学军. (2013). 中文阅读知觉广度的影响因素研究. 心理发展与教育, 29, 121–30.]Google Scholar

Yan, G., Zhang, Q., Zhang, L., & Bai, X. (2013). The effect of masking materials on perceptual span in Chinese reading, Journal of Psychological Science, 36, 1317–22. [闫国利, 张巧明, 张兰兰, & 白学军. (2013). 不同掩蔽材料对阅读知觉广度的影响. 心理科学, 36, 1317–22.]Google Scholar

Yan, M., & Kliegl, R. (2016). CarPrice versus CarpRice: Word boundary ambiguity influences saccade target selection during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42, 1832–8.Google Scholar

Yan, M., Kliegl, R., Richter, E. M., Nuthmann, A., & Shu, H. (2010). Flexible saccade-target selection in Chinese reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 705–25.Google Scholar

Yan, M., Richter, E. M., Shu, H., & Kliegl, R. (2009). Readers of Chinese extract semantic information from parafoveal words. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 561–6.Google Scholar

Yan, X., Jiang, K., Li, H., Wang, Z., Perkins, K., & Cao, F. (2021). Convergent and divergent brain structural and functional abnormalities associated with developmental dyslexia. elife, 10, e69523.Google Scholar

Yang, H., Chen, J., Spinelli, G., & Lupker, S. J. (2019). The impact of text orientation on form priming effects in four-character Chinese words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45, 1511–26.Google Scholar

Yang, H., Hino, Y., Chen, J., Yoshihara, M., Nakayama, M., Xue, J., & Lupker, S. J. (2020). The origins of backward priming effects in logographic scripts for four-character words. Journal of Memory and Language, 113, 104107.Google Scholar

Yang, J. F., McCandliss, B. D., Shu, H., & Zevin, J. D. (2009). Simulating language-specific and language-general effects in a statistical learning model of Chinese reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 238–57.Google Scholar

Yang, J. F., Shu, H., McCandliss, B. D., & Zevin, J. D. (2013). Orthographic influences on division of labor in learning to read Chinese and English: Insights from computational modeling. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 354–66.Google Scholar

Yang, J. F., Zevin, J. D., Shu, H., McCandliss, B. D., & Li, P. (2006). A “triangle model” of Chinese reading. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Cognitive Science Society, 912–17.Google Scholar

Yang, J. M, Staub, A., Li, N., Wang, S., & Rayner, K. (2012). Plausibility effects when reading one- and two-character words in Chinese: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1801–9.Google Scholar

Yang, J. M., Wang, S., Tong, X., & Rayner, K. (2012). Semantic and plausibility effects on preview benefit during eye fixations in Chinese reading. Reading and Writing, 25, 1031–52.Google Scholar

Yang, J. M., Wang, S., Xu, Y., & Rayner, K. (2009). Do Chinese readers obtain preview benefit from word n + 2? Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1192–204.Google Scholar

Yang, L. P., Li, C., Li, X., Zhai, M., An, Q., Zhang, Y., et al. (2022). Prevalence of developmental dyslexia in primary school children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Sciences, 12, 240.Google Scholar

Yang, L. Y., Guo, J. P., Richman, L. C., Schmidt, F. L., Gerken, K. C., & Ding, Y. (2013). Visual skills and Chinese reading acquisition: A meta-analysis of correlation evidence. Educational Psychology Review, 25, 115–43.Google Scholar

Yao, P., Staub, A., & Li, X. (2022). Predictability eliminates neighborhood effects during Chinese sentence reading. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 29, 243–52.Google Scholar

Yen, M. H., Radach, R., Tzeng, O. J. L., & Tsai, J. L. (2012). Usage of statistical cues for word boundary in reading Chinese sentences. Reading and Writing, 25, 1007–29.Google Scholar

Yeung, P. S., Ho, C. S. H., Chan, D. W. O., & Chung, K. K. H. (2016). Orthographic skills important to Chinese literacy development: The role of radical representation and orthographic memory of radicals. Reading and Writing, 29, 1935–58.Google Scholar

Yeung, P. S., Ho, C. S. H., Wong, Y. K., Chan, D. W. O., Chung, K. K. H., & Lo, L. Y. (2013). Longitudinal predictors of Chinese word reading and spelling among elementary grade students. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34, 1245–77.Google Scholar

Yin, W. & Butterworth, B. (1992). Deep and surface dyslexia in Chinese. In Chen, H. C. & Tzeng, O. J. L. (eds.), Language Processing in Chinese. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 349–66).Google Scholar

Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 441–517.Google Scholar

Yu, B., & Cao, H. (1992). A new exploration on the effect of stroke-number in the identification of Chinese characters. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 24, 120–6. [喻柏林, & 曹河圻. (1992). 汉字识别中的笔画数效应新探——兼论字频效应. 心理学报, 24, 120–6.]Google Scholar

Yu, B., Li, C. & Zhang, S. (1995). Effects of complexities on recognition for tilted Chinese characters. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 27, 337–43. [喻柏林, 李朝晖, & 张蜀林. (1995). 复杂性对倾斜汉字识别的影响. 心理学报, 27, 337–43.]Google Scholar

Yu, L., Cutter, M. G., Yan, G., Bai, X., Fu, Y., Drieghe, D., & Liversedge, S. P. (2016). Word n+ 2 preview effects in three-character Chinese idioms and phrases. Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 31, 1130–49.Google Scholar

Yu, L., Liu, Y., & Reichle, E. D. (2021). A corpus-based vs. experimental examination of word- and character-frequency effects in Chinese reading: Theoretical implications for models of reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150, 1612–41.Google Scholar

Yu, L., Zhang, Q., Ke, M., Han, Y., & Kinoshita, S. (2022). Some neighbors are more interfering: Asymmetric priming by stroke neighbors in Chinese character recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 30, 1062–73.Google Scholar

Zang, C., Wang, Y., Bai, X., Yan, G., Drieghe, D., & Liversedge, S. P. (2016). The use of probabilistic lexicality cues for word segmentation in Chinese reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 548–60.Google Scholar

Zhang, J., & Jiang, M. (2008). The effects of the radical family size and high frequency phonetic radical family member on phonogram recognition. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 40, 947–60. [张积家, & 姜敏敏. (2008). 形旁家族、声旁家族和高频同声旁字对形声字识别的影响. 心理学报, 40, 947–60.]Google Scholar

Zhang, J., & Wang, H. (2001). The effects of phonological and tonal relations between phonetic radicals and whole characters on the processing of pictophonetic characters. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 33, 193–7. [张积家, & 王惠萍. (2001). 声旁与整字的音段, 声调关系对形声字命名的影响. 心理学报, 33, 193–7.]Google Scholar

Zhang, L., Xia, Z., Zhao, Y., Shu, H., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Recent Advances in Chinese Developmental Dyslexia. Annual Review of Linguistics, 9. 439–61.Google Scholar

Zhang, Q., Zhou, Y., & Lou, H. (2022). The dissociation between age of acquisition and word frequency effects in Chinese spoken picture naming. Psychological Research, 86, 1918–29.Google Scholar

Zhang, W., & Feng, L. (1992). A study on the unit of processing in recognition of Chinese characters. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 24, 379–85. [张武田, & 冯玲. (1992). 关于汉字识别加工单位的研究. 心理学报, 24, 379–85.]Google Scholar

Zhang, Z., Han, B., & Chen, T. (2003). Frequency effect of phonetic component in naming Chinese character component in different target presenting speed. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 35, 178–82. [张喆, 韩布新, & 陈天勇. (2003). 两种呈现速度下整字及声旁命名. 心理学报, 35, 178–82.]Google Scholar

Zhao, J., & Li, S. (2014). Development of form recognition of visual word in Chinese children of 3 to 6 years old. Journal of Psychological Science, 37, 357–62. [赵静, & 李甦. (2014). 3~ 6 岁儿童汉字字形认知的发展. 心理科学, 37, 357–62.]Google Scholar

Zhou, J., & Li, X. (2021). On the segmentation of Chinese incremental words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 47, 1353–68.Google Scholar

Zhou, J., Ma, G., Li, X., & Taft, M. (2018). The time course of incremental word processing during Chinese reading. Reading and Writing, 31, 607–25.Google Scholar

Zhou, Y. L., McBride-Chang, C., Fong, C. Y. C., Wong, T. T. Y., & Cheung, S. K. (2012). A comparison of phonological awareness, lexical compounding, and homophone training for Chinese word reading in Hong Kong kindergarteners. Early Education and Development, 23, 475–92.Google Scholar

Ziegler, J. C., Tan, L. H., Perry, C., & Montant, M. (2000). Phonology matters: The phonological frequency effect in written Chinese. Psychological Science, 11, 234–8.Google Scholar

Zorzi, M., Houghton, G., & Butterworth, B. (1998). Two routes or one in reading aloud? A connectionist dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1131–61.Google Scholar

Book contents

References

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive