Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T04:00:09.853Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 9 - Developing Change Competencies

An Examination of Sensemaking Processes in a Change Management Competency Intervention

from Part IV - The Development of Change Leadership

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2023

By
Johan Simonsen Abildgaard ,
Karina Nielsen  and
Esben Langager Olsen
Edited by
Shaul Oreg ,
Alexandra Michel  and
Rune Todnem By
Shaul Oreg
Affiliation:
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Alexandra Michel
Affiliation:
Universität Heidelberg
Rune Todnem By
Affiliation:
Universitet i Stavanger, Norway
Get access

Summary

Managers act as change agents on the frontlines of the day-to-day implementation of change processes at the same time as having to manage daily operations. This double role puts them under pressure to both implement change processes efficiently and emphasizes the need for tools and techniques to develop the change competencies of managers. This chapter addresses this issue by presenting a case study of a change management competency intervention. The intervention lasted four days of workshops and consisted of dialog exercises and serious-game simulations. The participating managers were presented with change dilemmas related to key change concepts such as change phases, change resistance/readiness, and balancing change and stability, with the aim to improve their change competencies. Drawing on interviews with managers participating in the training we analyze how the intervention challenged the managers’ perspectives on their change management and fostered learning and development of change competencies. The key role of sensemaking processes are analyzed to nuance and theorize the complexities of developing change competency.

Keywords

serious gameinterventionsensemakingchange competencytraininglearningqualitatvecase study
Type
Chapter
Information
The Psychology of Organizational Change
New Insights on the Antecedents and Consequences of Individuals' Responses to Change
 , pp. 185 - 207
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abildgaard, J. S. (2018). Tricks of the trade: Practical advice from the PIPPI project for evaluating organizational interventions. In Nielsen, K. & Noblet, A. (eds.), Organizational Interventions for Health and Well-being: A Handbook for Evidence-Based Practice (pp. 144–166). Oxford: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abildgaard, J. S., & Nielsen, K. (2018). The interplay of sensemaking and material artefacts during interventions: A case study. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.18291/njwls.v8i3.109538Google Scholar
Abt, C. C. (1987). Serious games. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Agger, A., & Møller, M. (2018). Leadership development simulations from the best of intention to real-life balance. In Gudiksen, S. & Inlove, J. (eds.), Why innovators and changemakers use games to break down silos, drive engagement and build trust (pp. 139–154). London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
Ala-Laurinaho, A., Kurki, A.-L., & Abildgaard, J. S. (2017). Supporting sensemaking to promote a systemic view of organizational change: Contributions from activity theory. Journal of Change Management, 17(4), 367–387.Google Scholar
Andersen, T. K. (2018). Understanding the success or failure of organizational ICT integration: The criticality of managerial involvement. Journal of Change Management, 18(4), 327–343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Argyris, C. (1991). Teaching smart people how to learn. Harvard Business Review, 69(3), 99–109.Google Scholar
Armenakis, A. A., & Bedeian, A. G. (1999). Organizational change: A review of theory and research in the 1990s. Journal of Management, 25(3), 293–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balogun, J., & Johnson, G. (2005). From intended strategies to unintended outcomes: The impact of change recipient sensemaking. Organization Studies, 26(11), 1573–1601.Google Scholar
Battilana, J., Gilmartin, M., Sengul, M., Pache, A.-C., & Alexander, J. A. (2010). Leadership competencies for implementing planned organizational change. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(3), 422–438.Google Scholar
Bickerich, K., Michel, A., & O’Shea, D. (2018). Executive coaching during organisational change: A qualitative study of executives and coaches perspectives. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 11(2), 117–143.Google Scholar
Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In APA Handbooks in Psychology. APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological (pp. 57–71). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2015). Interviews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Burnes, B. (2012). Kurt Lewin and the origins of OD. In Boje, D. M., Burnes, B., & Hassard, J. (eds.), The Routledge companion to organizational change (pp. 29–44). Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Carey, M., & Russell, S. (2003). Outsider-witness practices: Some answers to commonly asked questions. The International Journal of Narrative Therapy and Community Work, 1, 1–22.Google Scholar
Colville, I., Pye, A., & Brown, A. D. (2016). Sensemaking processes and Weickarious learning. Management Learning, 47(1), 3–13.Google Scholar
Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2003 ). Semantic learning as change enabler: Relating organizational identity and organizational learning. In Easterby-Smith, M. & Lyles, M. (eds.), The Blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management (pp. 621–636). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Czarniawska, B. (1998). A narrative approach to Oorganization studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Faria, A. J., Hutchinson, D., Wellington, W. J., & Gold, S. (2009). Developments in business gaming: A review of the past 40 years. Simulation & Gaming, 40(4), 464–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guiette, A., & Vandenbempt, K. (2016). Learning in times of dynamic complexity through balancing phenomenal qualities of sensemaking. Management Learning, 47(1), 83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Have, S. ten, Have, W. ten, Huijsmans, A.-B., & Eng, N. van der. (2015). Change competence, implementing effective change (1st ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Higgs, M., & Rowland, D. (2000). Building change leadership capability: “The quest for change competence”. Journal of Change Management, 1(2), 116–130.Google Scholar
Higgs, M., & Rowland, D. (2011). What does it take to implement change successfully? A study of the behaviors of successful change leaders. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 47(3), 309–335.Google Scholar
Iveroth, E., & Hallencreutz, J. (2015). Effective organizational change: Leading through sensemaking. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
de Jong, T., Wiezer, N., de Weerd, M., Nielsen, K., Mattila-Holappa, P., & Mockałło, Z. (2016). The impact of restructuring on employee well-being: A systematic review of longitudinal studies. Work & Stress, 30(1), 91–114.Google Scholar
Jordan, M. E., Lanham, H. J., Crabtree, B. F., Nutting, P. A., Miller, W. L., Stange, K. C., & McDaniel, R. R. (2009). The role of conversation in health care interventions: Enabling sensemaking and learning. Implementation Science, 4(1), 15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kieselbach, T., Armgarth, E., Bagnara, S., Elo, A.-L., Jefferys, S., Joling, C., et al. (2009). Health in restructuring: Innovative approaches and policy recommendations (HIRES). Bremen, Germany: Universität Bremen.Google Scholar
Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 193–212.Google Scholar
Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
Krummaker, S., & Vogel, B. (2013). An in-depth view of the facets, antecedents, and effects of leaders’ change competency: Lessons from a case study. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 49(3), 279–307.Google Scholar
Kurz, R., & Bartram, D. (2002). Competency and individual performance: Modelling the world of work. In Robertson, I. T., Callinan, M., & Bartram, D. (eds.) Organizational effectiveness: The role of psychiatry (pp. 227–255). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Google Scholar
Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics: Concept, method and reality in social science; social equilibria and social change. Human Relations, 1(1), 5–41.Google Scholar
Lundmark, R., Hasson, H., Schwarz, U. von T., Hasson, D., & Tafvelin, S. (2017). Leading for change: Line managers’ influence on the outcomes of an occupational health intervention. Work & Stress, 31(3), 276–296.Google Scholar
Lüscher, L. S., & Lewis, M. W. (2008). Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: Working through paradox. The Academy of Management Journal, 51(2), 221–240.Google Scholar
Maitlis, S., & Christianson, M. (2014). Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. The Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 57–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maurer, R. (2010). Beyond the wall of resistance: Why 70% of all changes still fail and what you can do about it. Austin, TX: Bard Press.Google Scholar
Moon, J. A. (2013). A handbook of reflective and experiential learning: Theory and practice. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Myers, I. B., McCaulley, M. H., Quenk, N. L., & Hammer, A. L. (1998). MBTI manual: A guide to the development and use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, vol. 3. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
Nielsen, K., Randall, R., & Christensen, K. B. (2010). Does training managers enhance the effects of implementing team-working? A longitudinal, mixed methods field study. Human Relations, 63(11), 1719–1741.Google Scholar
Olsen, E. L., Wåhlin-Jacobsen, C. D., & Abildgaard, J. S. (2020). Reconceptualizing job control in participatory interventions: Collective sensemaking as a missing link. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.18291/njwls.122137Google Scholar
Owen, J. E., Mahatmya, D., & Carter, R. (2017). Dominance, influence, steadiness, and conscientiousness (DISC) assessment tool. In Zeigler-Hill, V. & Shackelford, T. K. (eds.), Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences (pp. 1–4). Cham: Springer International.Google Scholar
Riessman, C. K. (1993). Narrative analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Riessman, C. K. (2002). Narrative aAnalysis. In Huberman, A. & Miles, M. (eds.), The qualitative researcher’s companion (pp. 216–270). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Sartori, R., Costantini, A., Ceschi, A., & Tommasi, F. (2018). How do you manage change in organizations? Training, development, innovation, and their relationships. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 313.Google Scholar
Schwandt, D. R. (2005). When managers become philosophers: Integrating learning with sensemaking. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 176–192.Google Scholar
Tafvelin, S., Hasson, H., Nielsen, K., & von Thiele Schwarz, U. (2021). Integrating a transfer perspective into evaluations of leadership training. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 42(6), 856–868.Google Scholar
Teulier, R., & Rouleau, L. (2013). Middle managers’ sensemaking and interorganizational change initiation: Translation spaces and editing practices. Journal of Change Management, 13(3), 308–337.Google Scholar
Thomas, K. W. (1988). The conflict-handling modes: Toward more precise theory. Management Communication Quarterly, 1(3), 430–436.Google Scholar
Todnem By, R. (2005). Organisational change management: A critical review. Journal of Change Management, 5(4), 369–380.Google Scholar
Vignoli, M., Nielsen, K., Guglielmi, D., Mariani, M. G., Patras, L., & Peirò, J. M. (2021). Design of a safety training package for migrant workers in the construction industry. Safety Science, 136, 105124.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E. (1991). The nontraditional quality of organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 116–124.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E. (1993). The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(4), 628.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E. (2007). Drop your tools: On reconfiguring management education. Journal of Management Education, 31(1), 5–16.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E. (2010). Reflections on enacted sensemaking in the Bhopal disaster. Journal of Management Studies, 47(3), 537–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2008). Organizing for high reliability: Processes of collective mindfulness. Crisis Management, 3, 81–123.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. P., & Beard, C. (2013). Experiential learning: A handbook for education, training and coaching. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
Womack, J., Jones, D., & Roos, D. (1991). The machine that changed the world: The story of lean production. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×