Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Introduction and overview: Key issues in the conceptualization of debriefing
- Part I Key conceptual framework of debriefing
- Part II Debriefing: models, research and practice
- Part III Adaptations of debriefing models
- 16 Delayed debriefing: after a disaster
- 17 Debriefing in different cultural frameworks: responding to acute trauma in Australian Aboriginal contexts
- 18 The concept of debriefing and its application to staff dealing with life-threatening illnesses such as cancer, AIDS and other conditions
- 19 Traumatic childbirth and the role of debriefing
- 20 Debriefing health care staff after assaults by patients
- 21 Multiple stressor debriefing as a model for intervention
- Part IV Debriefing overview and future directions
- Conclusion: debriefing – science, belief and wisdom
- Index
21 - Multiple stressor debriefing as a model for intervention
from Part III - Adaptations of debriefing models
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 January 2010
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Introduction and overview: Key issues in the conceptualization of debriefing
- Part I Key conceptual framework of debriefing
- Part II Debriefing: models, research and practice
- Part III Adaptations of debriefing models
- 16 Delayed debriefing: after a disaster
- 17 Debriefing in different cultural frameworks: responding to acute trauma in Australian Aboriginal contexts
- 18 The concept of debriefing and its application to staff dealing with life-threatening illnesses such as cancer, AIDS and other conditions
- 19 Traumatic childbirth and the role of debriefing
- 20 Debriefing health care staff after assaults by patients
- 21 Multiple stressor debriefing as a model for intervention
- Part IV Debriefing overview and future directions
- Conclusion: debriefing – science, belief and wisdom
- Index
Summary
EDITORIAL COMMENTS
Multiple stressor debriefing has evolved as an adaptation of debriefing processes to a framework for dealing with the multiple and often prolonged stresses involved in disaster relief work, for instance in the weeks and months following an earthquake in a devastated community. As Armstrong points out the stresses in these circumstances are multiple and not so clearly identifiable as those in the acute rescue phase. Workers may come from multiple settings, may not have been trained to work together, and may not have been adequately briefed or prepared for their contribution.
The author describes the model he and his group have evolved and provides examples of its implementation. The model is reported to be flexible and able to be used in individual, family or group situations according to specific need. It is of interest to see the potential of family-based interventions in this context and their possible normalizing roles. The intervention or debriefing model proposed is more positive and involves four phases: disclosure of events; feelings and reactions to these; coping strategies; and a termination phase that focusses on learning and integration. This more positive model may in and of itself have benefits as it appears not to pathologize the experience. Furthermore, as described, the model appears to provide for implementation in frameworks linked to need and also for opportunities for a screening approach to identify those in need of more ongoing clinical services.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Psychological DebriefingTheory, Practice and Evidence, pp. 290 - 302Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2000
- 1
- Cited by