Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T22:16:08.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

21 - Multiple stressor debriefing as a model for intervention

from Part III - Adaptations of debriefing models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2010

Beverley Raphael
Affiliation:
New South Wales Health Department, Sydney
John Wilson
Affiliation:
Cleveland State University
Get access

Summary

EDITORIAL COMMENTS

Multiple stressor debriefing has evolved as an adaptation of debriefing processes to a framework for dealing with the multiple and often prolonged stresses involved in disaster relief work, for instance in the weeks and months following an earthquake in a devastated community. As Armstrong points out the stresses in these circumstances are multiple and not so clearly identifiable as those in the acute rescue phase. Workers may come from multiple settings, may not have been trained to work together, and may not have been adequately briefed or prepared for their contribution.

The author describes the model he and his group have evolved and provides examples of its implementation. The model is reported to be flexible and able to be used in individual, family or group situations according to specific need. It is of interest to see the potential of family-based interventions in this context and their possible normalizing roles. The intervention or debriefing model proposed is more positive and involves four phases: disclosure of events; feelings and reactions to these; coping strategies; and a termination phase that focusses on learning and integration. This more positive model may in and of itself have benefits as it appears not to pathologize the experience. Furthermore, as described, the model appears to provide for implementation in frameworks linked to need and also for opportunities for a screening approach to identify those in need of more ongoing clinical services.

Type
Chapter
Information
Psychological Debriefing
Theory, Practice and Evidence
, pp. 290 - 302
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×