Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-7l9ct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-11T01:50:56.667Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Regionalism: moving from fragmentation towards coherence

from PART I - Constitutional issues in international trade regulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2011

By
Richard Baldwin  and
Theresa Carpenter
Edited by
Thomas Cottier  and
Panagiotis Delimatsis
Richard Baldwin
Affiliation:
Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva, Switzerland
Theresa Carpenter
Affiliation:
Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva, Switzerland
Thomas Cottier
Affiliation:
World Trade Institute
Panagiotis Delimatsis
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Tilburg, The Netherlands
Get access

Summary

KEY MESSAGES: THREE FACTS AND AN IMPLICATION

∙ Fact 1: The world trade system is marked by a motley assortment of discriminatory trade agreements known as the ‘Spaghetti Bowl’.

∙ Fact 2: Regionalism is here to stay. Trade agreements will continue to proliferate even after the current trade round meanders to a conclusion.

∙ Fact 3: This tangle of trade deals is a sub-optimal way to organise world trade. The discrimination inherent in regionalism is economically inefficient and the costs rise as manufacturing becomes ever more internationalised and supply chains grow across national borders.

Regionalism is also unfair. While the spaghetti bowl is a problem for firms in big nations, it is much more of a problem for firms in poor nations. Rich nations have the resources and negotiating leverage to navigate the tangle's worst effects. The governments of small and poor nations do not. The spaghetti bowl falls much harder on the heads of the world's small and poor nations.

Implication: As the spaghetti bowl's inefficiencies are increasingly magnified, the world must find a solution. Since regionalism is here to stay, the solution must work with existing regional arrangements, not against it. The solution must be to multilateralise regionalism.

Introduction

The World Trade Organization (WTO)-centric world trade system is principled and rules-based, yet flexible enough to embrace the vast range of realities facing nations across the planet. The key principle – Article I of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) – is non-discrimination.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Prospects of International Trade Regulation
From Fragmentation to Coherence
 , pp. 136 - 166
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Augier, P., Gasiorek, M and Tong, C. L. (2005). ‘The Impact of Rules of Origin on Trade Flows’, Economic Policy, 20(43): 567–624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, R. (1992). ‘The Economic Logic of EFTA Membership in the EEA and the EC’, EFTA Occasional Paper 41.
Baldwin, Richard (1993). ‘A Domino Theory of Regionalism’, CEPR Discussion Paper 857; NBER Working Paper, 4465. Published in Baldwin, Haaparanta and Kiander (eds.), Expanding Membership in the European Union, Cambridge University Press. Republished as Chapter 23 (pp. 479–502) in J. Bhagwati, P. Krishna and A. Panagariya (1999), Trading Blocs: Alternative Approaches to Analyzing Preferential Trade Agreements. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Richard (1994). Towards an Integrated Europe. London: CEPR.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Richard (1997). ‘The Causes of Regionalism’, The World Economy, 20(7): 865–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, Richard (2000). ‘Regulatory Protectionism, Developing Nations, and a Two-Tier World Trade System’, Brookings Trade Forum 2000, 237–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, Richard (2006a). ‘Managing the Noodle Bowl: The Fragility of East Asian Regionalism’, CEPR DP 5561, Singapore Economic Review, 53(03): 449–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, Richard (2006b). ‘Globalisation: The Great Unbundling(s)’, Globalisation Challenges for Europe. Helsinki: Secretariat of the Economic Council, Finnish Prime Minister's Office, Chapter 1, pp. 5–57.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Richard (2006c). ‘Multilateralising Regionalism: Spaghetti Bowls as Building Blocs on the Path to Global Free Trade’, The World Economy, 29(11): 1451–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, Richard (2008). ‘Sequencing and Depth of Regional Economic Integration: Lessons for the Americas from Europe’, The World Economy, 31(1): 5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, Richard and Seghezza, Elena (2007). ‘Are Trade Blocs Building or Stumbling Blocks? New Evidence’, CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP6599.
Baldwin, Richard and Rieder, Roland (2007). ‘A Test of Endogenous Trade Bloc Formation Theory on EU Data’, Journal of International Economic Studies, 11(2)(December): 77–111.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Richard and Jaimovich, Dany (2009). ‘Are Free Trade Agreements Contagious’, NCCR Trade Regulation Working Paper 2009/31.
Baldwin, Richard and Carpenter, Theresa (2009). ‘A 3 Bloc Dance: East Asian Regionalism and the North Atlantic Trade Giants’, NCCR Trade Regulation Working Paper 2009/29.
Baldwin, Richard, Evenett, Simon and Low, Patrick (2009). ‘Beyond Tariffs: Multilateralizing Non-tariff RTA Commitments’, in Baldwin, Richard and Low, Patrick (eds.), Multilateralizing Regionalism: Challenges for the Global Trading System. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Lorand and Ortino, Federico (eds.) (2007). Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO Legal System. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bhagwati, J. (1991). The World Trading System at Risk. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhagwati, J. (2008). Termites in the Trading System. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bombarda, Pamela and Gamberoni, Elisa (2008). ‘Firm Heterogeneity, Rules of Origin and Rules of Cumulation’, HEI Working Papers 09–2008, Economics Section, The Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies.
Carpenter, Theresa (2009). ‘A Historical Perspective on Regionalism’, in Baldwin, Richard and Low, Patrick (eds.), Multilateralizing Regionalism: Challenges for the Global Trading System. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cottier, Thomas and Foltea, Marina (2006). ‘Constitutional Functions of the WTO and Regional Trade Agreements’, in Bartels, Lorand and Ortino, Federico (eds.), Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO Legal System. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Crawford, Jo-Ann and Laird, Sam (2000). ‘Regional Trade Agreements and the WTO’, CREDIT Research Paper, No. 00/3, University of Nottingham.
Damuri, Yose (2009). ‘How Preferential are Preferential Trade Agreements? An analysis of Product Exclusions in PTAs’, NCCR Trade Regulation Working Paper 2009/30.
Delimatsis, Panagiotis (2007). International Trade in Services and Domestic Regulations: Necessity, Transparency, and Regulatory Diversity, Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draper, Peter and Qobo, Mzukisi (2009). ‘Multilateralizing Regionalism: Case Study of African Regionalism’, in Baldwin, Richard and Low, Patrick (eds.), Multilateralizing Regionalism: Challenges for the Global Trading System. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Egger, Peter and Larch, Mario (2008). ‘Interdependent Preferential Trade Agreement Memberships: An Empirical Analysis’, Journal of International Economics, 76(2): 384–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estevadeordal, Antoni, Freund, Caroline and Ornelas, Emanuel (2008). ‘Does Regionalism Affect Trade Liberalization toward Nonmembers?’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, MIT Press, 123(4): 1531–75.Google Scholar
Estevadeordal, Antoni, Harris, Jeremy and Suominen, Kati (2009). ‘Harmonizing Preferential Rules of Origin Regimes around the World’, in Baldwin, Richard and Low, Patrick (eds.), Multilateralizing Regionalism: Challenges for the Global Trading System. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estevadeordal, Antoni, Shearer, Matthew and Suominen, Kati (2009). ‘Multilateralizing RTAs in the Americas: State of Play and Ways Forward’, in Baldwin, Richard and Low, Patrick (eds.), Multilateralizing Regionalism: Challenges for the Global Trading System. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fink, Carsten and Jansen, Marion (2009). ‘Services Provisions in Regional Trade Agreements: Stumbling Blocks or Building Blocks for Multilateral Liberalization?’ in Baldwin, Richard and Low, Patrick (eds.), Multilateralizing Regionalism: Challenges for the Global Trading System. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fink, Carsten and Molinuevo, Martin (2008). ‘East Asian Free Trade Agreements in Services: Key Architectural Elements’, Journal of International Economic Law, 11(2): 263–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorentino, Roberto V., Verdeja, Luis and Toqueboeuf, Christelle (2007). ‘The Changing Landscape of Regional Trade Agreements: 2006 Update’ WTO Discussion Paper No. 12.
Foroutan, Faezeh (1998). ‘Does Membership in a Regional Preferential Trade Agreement Make a Country More or Less Protectionist?’ The World Economy, 21(3): 305–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamberoni, Elisa (2008). ‘Do Unilateral Trade Preferences Help Export Diversification? An Investigation of the Impact of European Unilateral Trade Preferences on the Extensive and Intensive Margin of Trade’, HEI Working Papers 17–2007, Graduate Institute of International Studies and Development.
Gamberoni, Elisa (2009). ‘Market Access, Imported Inputs and Export Growth: An Analysis of Mauritius Exporting Firms’, PhD thesis, Geneva, Graduate Institute, Chapter 3.
Hoekman, Bernard and Winters, Alan (2009). ‘Multilateralizing Preferential Trade Agreements: A Developing Country Perspective’, in Baldwin, Richard and Low, Patrick (eds.), Multilateralizing Regionalism: Challenges for the Global Trading System. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, Tammy (2005). ‘What Drives Regional Trade Agreements that Work?’, HEI Working Papers 07–2005, Economics Section, The Graduate Institute of International Studies.
Horn, Henrik, Mavroidis, Petros C. and Sapir, André (2009). ‘Beyond The WTO? An Anatomy of EU and US Preferential Trade Agreements’, Centre for Economic Policy Research Discussion Paper No. 7317, available at www.iadb.org/intal/intalcdi/PE/2009/03795.pdf.
Hufbauer, Gary and Schott, Jeffrey (2009). ‘Fitting Asia-Pacific Agreements into the WTO System’, in Baldwin, Richard and Low, Patrick (eds.), Multilateralizing Regionalism: Challenges for the Global Trading System. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Joshi, Vivek (2009). ‘Preferential Tariff Formation: The Case of the European Union’, CTEI Working Paper 111.
Kawai, Masahiro and Wignaraja, Ganeshan (2009). ‘Multilateralizing Regional Trade Arrangements in Asia.’ in Baldwin, Richard and Low, Patrick (eds.), Multilateralizing Regionalism: Challenges for the Global Trading System. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Robert (1996). Regionalism, Multinationalism, and Deeper Integration. Washington, DC, Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Lendle, Andreas (2007). ‘The ASEAN Free Trade Agreement: Building Block or Stumbling Block?’, NCCR Trade Regulation Working Paper 2007/33.
Marchetti, Juan and Roy, Martin (eds.) (2009). Opening Markets for Trade in Services: Countries and Sectors in Bilateral and WTO Negotiations. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost (2009). ‘Legal Avenues to “Multilateralising Regionalism”: Beyond Article XXIV’, in Baldwin, Richard and Low, Patrick (eds.), Multilateralizing Regionalism: Challenges for the Global Trading System. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rollo, Jim (2009). ‘The Challenge of Negotiating RTAs for Developing Countries. What Could the WTO Do to Help?’ in Baldwin, Richard and Low, Patrick (eds.), Multilateralizing Regionalism: Challenges for the Global Trading System. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roy, Martin, Marchetti, Juan and Lim, Hoe (2006). ‘Services Liberalization in the New Generation of Preferential Trade Agreements (PTAs): How Much Further than the GATS?’, WTO Staff Working Paper ERSD-2006–07.
Sapir, Andre (2001). ‘Domino Effects in Western European Regional Trade, 1960–1992’, European Journal of Political Economy, 17(2): 377–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeats, Alexander (1998). ‘Does Mercosur's Trade Performance Raise Concerns about the Effects of Regional Trade Arrangements?’, World Bank Economic Review, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×