Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T08:09:42.710Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Developing trade rules for services: a case of fragmented coherence?

from PART II - Reforming specific areas of trade regulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2011

Panagiotis Delimatsis
Affiliation:
University of Bern, Switzerland
Nicolas Diebold
Affiliation:
Froriep Renggli, Zurich, Switzerland
Martín Molinuevo
Affiliation:
University of Bern, Switzerland
Marion Panizzon
Affiliation:
University of Bern, Switzerland
Pierre Sauvé
Affiliation:
University of Bern, Switzerland
Thomas Cottier
Affiliation:
World Trade Institute
Panagiotis Delimatsis
Affiliation:
Universiteit van Tilburg, The Netherlands
Get access

Summary

KEY MESSAGES

∙ Trade in services ranks among the most intractable subject matters in modern trade diplomacy. Confronted with such complexity, diversity, learning by doing and fragmentation are key characteristics of the evolving regimes governing services trade.

∙ Fragmentation may represent a source of policy and innovation able to inform and shape future directions in multilateral rule-making. It can also offer alternative theatres of collective action able to yield superior outcomes or more politically palatable bargains than those on offer at the World Trade Organization (WTO) or under preferential trade agreements (PTAs).

∙ The adoption of a necessity test applicable across services sectors and enhanced transparency disciplines would improve the quality of services trade regulation. The absence of a necessity test can devalue regulatory disciplines on domestic regulation.

∙ The immigration law caveat of the GATS Annex on the Temporary Movement of Natural Persons and flexibilities within the structure for scheduling GATS commitments exacerbate the divide between a global labour migration regime favouring high-skilled workers and bilateral, non-trade migration agreements regulating the flows of low-skilled and potentially irregular migrants. This schism prevents progress towards a coherent global governance of migration.

∙ The interpretation of the ‘likeness’ concept in the GATS rules on non-discrimination requires an assessment of the competitive relationship between suppliers and services in the marketplace. As trade in services may involve the movement of suppliers and services, consideration must be given to both service-related and supplier-related factors in order to reach an overall conclusion on the competitive relationship between the types of service transactions under scrutiny. […]

Type
Chapter
Information
The Prospects of International Trade Regulation
From Fragmentation to Coherence
, pp. 245 - 283
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adlung, Rudolf and Molinuevo, Martín, ‘Bilateralism in Services Trade: Is there Fire behind the (BIT-)smoke?’ (2008) 11(2) Journal of International Economic Law 365–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beviglia-Zampetti, Americo and Sauvé, Pierre, ‘International Investment’, in Sykes, Alan O. and Guzman, Andrew (eds.), Research Handbook in International Economic Law (London: Edward Elgar, 2007), pp. 211–270.Google Scholar
Bravo, Karen ‘Free Labor! A Labor Liberalization Solution to the Modern Traffic in Humans’ (2009) 18 Transnational Law & Contemporary Problems 545.
Bronckers, Marco and McNeils, Natalie, ‘Rethinking the “Like Product” Definition in GATT 1994: Anti-Dumping and Environmental Protection’, in Cottier, T., Mavroidis, P. C. and Blatter, P. (eds.), Regulatory Barriers and the Principle of Non-Discrimination in World Trade Law: Past, Present, and Future (University of Michigan Press, 2000), pp. 345–385.Google Scholar
Broude, Tomer, ‘The WTO/GATS Mode 4, International Labour Migration Regimes and Global Justice’, Research Paper No. 7–07, May 2007, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Faculty of Law.
Cali, Massimiliano, ‘Liberalizing Mode 4 Trade: What Impact on Exporting Countries?’, Presentation at the WTO Symposium, ‘Mode 4 of the GATS: Taking Stock and Moving Forward’, 22–23 September 2008.
Chanda, Rupa, ‘Low-skilled Workers and Bilateral, Regional, and Unilateral Initiatives, Lessons for the GATS Mode 4 Negotiations and other Agreements’, UNDP Report, 2008.
Carzaniga, Antonia, ‘A Warmer Welcome? Access for Natural Persons under Preferential Trade Agreements’, in Marchetti, J. A. and Roy, M. (eds.), Opening Markets for Trade in Services Countries and Sectors in Bilateral and WTO Negotiations (Cambridge University Press, 2009), pp. 475–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassarino, Jean-Pierre, ‘Informalising Readmission Agreements in the EU Neighbourhood’ (2007) 42(2) The International Spectator, 179–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castles, Stephen, ‘Guestworkers in Europe: A Resurrection?’ (2006) 40(4) International Migration Review, 741–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cossy, Mireille, ‘Some Thoughts on the Concept of “Likeness” in the GATS’, in Panizzon, M., Pohl, N and Sauvé, P. (eds.), GATS and the Regulation of International Trade in Services (Cambridge University Press, 2008), pp. 327–357.Google Scholar
Cottier, Thomas, Delimatsis, Panagiotis and Diebold, Nicolas, ‘Article XIV GATS’ (General Exceptions), in Wolfrum, R., Stoll, P.-T. and Feinäugle, C. (eds.), WTO-Trade in Services: Max-Planck Commentaries on World Trade Law (Brill Publishers, 2008), pp. 287–328.Google Scholar
Delimatsis, Panagiotis, ‘Due Process and “Good” Regulation Embedded in the GATS: Disciplining Regulatory Behaviour in Services through Article VI of the GATS’ (2007) 10(1) Journal of International Economic Law13–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delimatsis, Panagiotis, International Trade in Services and Domestic Regulations: Necessity, Transparency, and Regulatory Diversity (Oxford University Press, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delimatsis, Panagiotis, Article III GATS, in Wolfrum, R., Stoll, P.-T and Feinäugle, C. (eds.), Max-Planck Commentaries on World Trade Law, Volume 6: WTO-Trade in Services (Brill Publishers, 2008), pp. 92–107.Google Scholar
Delimatsis, Panagiotis, ‘Determining the Necessity of Domestic Regulations in Services: The Best is Yet to Come’ (2008) 19(2) European Journal of International Law365–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matos, Claudia and Efionayi-Mäder, Denise, ‘Bestandesaufnahme von Migrationspartnerschaften in der Schweiz’, in Bern, IOM (ed.), Migrationspartnerschaften: Eine Bestandesaufnahme (IOM Bern, 3rd edn, 2007).
Diebold, Nicolas F., ‘The Morals and Order Exceptions in WTO Law: Balancing the Toothless Tiger and the Undermining Mole’ (2008) 11 Journal of International Economic Law43–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMascio, Nicholas and Pauwelyn, Joost, ‘Nondiscrimination in Trade and Investment Treaties: Worlds Apart or Two Sides of the Same Coin?’ (2008) 102 American Journal of International Law48–89.Google Scholar
Esty, Daniel, ‘Good Governance at the Supranational Scale: Globalizing Administrative Law’ (2006) 115 Yale Law Journal1490–1562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fink, Carsten and Molinuevo, Martín, ‘East Asian Free Trade Agreements in Services: Roaring Tigers or Timid Pandas?’, East Asia and Pacific Region Report No. 40175, The World Bank, http://go.worldbank.org/5YFZ3TK4E0.
Goco, Jonell B., ‘Non-Discrimination, “Likeness”, and Market Definition in World Trade Organization Jurisprudence’ (2006) 40 Journal of World Trade315–40.Google Scholar
Grynberg, Roman and Qalo, Veniana, ‘Migration and the World Trade Organization’ (2007) 41(4) Journal of World Trade751–782.Google Scholar
Gugler, Philippe and Julien, Chaisse, ‘Foreign Investment Issues and WTO Law: Dealing with Fragmentation while waiting for a Multilateral Framework’, in Chaisse, Julien and Balmelli, Tiziano (eds.), Essays on the Future of the World Trade Organization (Geneva: Editions Interuniversitaires Suisses, 2008), pp. 135–171.Google Scholar
Gugler, Philippe and Vladimir, Tomsik, ‘A Comparison of the Provisions Affecting Investment in the Existing WTO Obligations’, NCCR Working Paper No. 15, August 2006.
Hollifield, James H. ‘Migration and the “New” International Order: The Missing Regime’, in Ghosh, B. (ed.), Managing Migration, Time for a New International Regime (Oxford University Press, 2000), pp. 100–101.Google Scholar
Hudec, Robert E., ‘“Like Product”: The Differences in Meaning in GATT Articles I and III’, in Cottier, T., Mavroidis, P. C. and Blatter, P. (eds.), Regulatory Barriers and the Principle of Non-Discrimination in World Trade Law: Past, Present, and Future (University of Michigan Press, 2000), pp. 101–23.Google Scholar
Kapur, Devesh, and McHale, John, Give us Your Best and Your Brightest: The Global Hunt for Talent and Its Impact on the Developing World (Washington, DC: Center for Global Development, 2005).Google Scholar
Krajewski, Markus, National Regulation and Trade Liberalization in Services: The Legal Impact of the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) on National Regulatory Autonomy (Kluwer Law International, 2005).
Martin, Lisa, ‘The Rational State Choice of Multilateralism,’ in Ruggie, D. (ed.), Multilateralism Matters (Columbia University Press, 1993), pp. 91–121.Google Scholar
Mattoo, Aaditya, ‘National Treatment in the GATS – Corner-Stone or Pandora's Box?’ (1997) 31 Journal of World Trade, 107–135.Google Scholar
Mattoo, Aaditya and Sauvé, Pierre, ‘Regionalism in Services Trade’, in Aaditya, Mattoo, Stern, Robert M and Zanini, Gianni (eds.), A Handbook of International Trade in Services (Oxford University Press, 2007), pp. 221–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maurer, Andreas and Chauvet, Philippe, ‘The Magnitude of Flows of Global Trade in Services’, in Hoekman, B, Mattoo, A. and English, P. (eds.), Development, Trade and the WTO, A Handbook (World Bank, 2002), pp. 235–246.Google Scholar
Murphy, Sean D., ‘US Interpretation of Core NAFTA Investment Standards’ (2001) 95 American Journal of International Law882.Google Scholar
Panizzon, Marion, ‘Trade and Labor Migration: GATS Mode 4 and Migration Agreements’, Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Geneva, Occasional Paper Series No. 47 (2010).
Panizzon, Marion, ‘Labour Mobility: A win-win-win model for Trade and Development: The Case of Senegal’, NCCR Working Paper No. 7, June 2008, available at: www.nccr-trade.org/ip-8/labour-mobility-as-a-win-win-win-model-for-trade-and-development-in-the-case-of-senegal-2.html (24 November 2008).
Pauwelyn, Joost, ‘Comment: The Unbearable Lightness of Likeness’, in Panizzon, M., Pohl, N. and Sauvé, P. (eds.), GATS and the Regulation of International Trade in Services (Cambridge University Press, 2008), pp. 358–69.Google Scholar
Pritchett, Lant, Let their People Come, Breaking the Gridlock on International Labor Mobility (Washington, DC: Center for Global Development, 2006).Google Scholar
Pritchett, Lant, ‘Been There, Not Yet Done That: Lessons and Challenges in Services Trade’, in Marion, Panizzon, Pohl, Nicole and Sauvé, Pierre (eds.), GATS and the Regulation of International Trade in Services (Cambridge University Press, 2008), pp. 599–631.Google Scholar
Pritchett, Lant, ‘Multilateral Rules on Investment: Is Forward Movement Possible?’ (2006) 9(2) Journal of International Economic Law325–355.Google Scholar
Pritchett, Lant, ‘Qs and As on Trade, Investment and the WTO’ (1997) 31(8) Journal of World Trade 55–79.Google Scholar
Sauvé, Pierre and Molinuevo, Martin, ‘Does Architecture Matter? The Treatment of Trade and Investment in Financial Services in Selected Preferential Trade Agreements’, NCCR Working Paper, No. 9, May 2008.
Schreuer, Christoph, ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment in Arbitral Practice’ (2005) 6(3) Journal of World Investment & Trade 357–386.Google Scholar
Sommerville, Will and Sumption, Madelein, ‘Immigration in the United Kingdom, The Recession and Beyond’, Report for the Equality and Human Rights Commission, March 2009.
Trachtman, Joel, The International Law of Economic Migration: Toward the Fourth Freedom (W. E. Upjohn Institute, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiler, Todd, ‘Saving Oscar Chin: Non-Discrimination in International Investment Law’, in T. Weiler (ed.), International Investment Law and Arbitration (London: Cameron May, 2005).Google Scholar
Zdouc, Werner, Legal Problems Arising under the General Agreement on Trade in Services: Comparative Analysis of GATS and GATT (Difo-Druck, 2002).
,Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, The Global Approach to Migration one year on: Towards a comprehensive European migration policy, Brussels, 30.11.2006, COM(2006) 735 final.
,Draft Final Act Embodying the Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations, MTN.TNC/W/35/Rev.1, 3 December 1990.
,Global Commission on International Migration (GCIM), Final Report, October 2005, available at: www.gcim.org/attachements/gcim-complete-report-2005.pdf.
,Group of Negotiations on Services, Report to the Trade Negotiations Committee meeting at Ministerial level, December 1988, MTN.GNS/21, 25 November 1988.
,United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, ‘Recent developments in international investment agreements’, IIA Monitor No. 2 (2008), (United Nations, 2008).
,United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, ‘National Treatment’, UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements (United Nations, 1999).
,United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, ‘Scope and Definition’, UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements (United Nations, 1999).
,WPDR, Disciplines on Domestic Regulation Pursuant to GATS Article VI:4, Room Document, 20 March 2009.
,Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, The Global Approach to Migration one year on: Towards a comprehensive European migration policy, Brussels, 30.11.2006, COM(2006) 735 final.
,Draft Final Act Embodying the Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations, MTN.TNC/W/35/Rev.1, 3 December 1990.
,Global Commission on International Migration (GCIM), Final Report, October 2005, available at: www.gcim.org/attachements/gcim-complete-report-2005.pdf.
,Group of Negotiations on Services, Report to the Trade Negotiations Committee meeting at Ministerial level, December 1988, MTN.GNS/21, 25 November 1988.
,United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, ‘Recent developments in international investment agreements’, IIA Monitor No. 2 (2008), (United Nations, 2008).
,United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, ‘National Treatment’, UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements (United Nations, 1999).
,United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, ‘Scope and Definition’, UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements (United Nations, 1999).
,WPDR, Disciplines on Domestic Regulation Pursuant to GATS Article VI:4, Room Document, 20 March 2009.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×