Book contents
- Prospects for Economic Growth in the United States
- Prospects for Economic Growth in the United States
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Notes on Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Overview
- Part II Labor and Economic Growth
- Part III Implications of Technology for Growth
- 5 “The $64,000 Question”: Living in the Age of Technological Possibility or Showing Possibility’s Age?
- 6 Artificial Intelligence Technologies and Aggregate Growth Prospects
- Part IV The Effects of Fiscal Policy on Growth
- Part V Special Topics on Economic Growth
- Part VI A Concluding Perspective
- Index
- References
5 - “The $64,000 Question”: Living in the Age of Technological Possibility or Showing Possibility’s Age?
from Part III - Implications of Technology for Growth
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 October 2021
Book contents
- Prospects for Economic Growth in the United States
- Prospects for Economic Growth in the United States
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Notes on Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Overview
- Part II Labor and Economic Growth
- Part III Implications of Technology for Growth
- 5 “The $64,000 Question”: Living in the Age of Technological Possibility or Showing Possibility’s Age?
- 6 Artificial Intelligence Technologies and Aggregate Growth Prospects
- Part IV The Effects of Fiscal Policy on Growth
- Part V Special Topics on Economic Growth
- Part VI A Concluding Perspective
- Index
- References
Summary
Will economic and productivity growth be slower going forward than in US experience over the past century or even over the postwar period, as techno-pessimists suggest? Or will technological changes usher in a new era of faster productivity growth and enhanced welfare? Are “headwinds” to growth from demographic, competitive, and social trends bound to blunt potential gains trumpeted by techno-optimists? This chapter describes the key arguments of the techno-optimists and the techno-pessimists. It argues that there is little a priori reason to doubt that technological advances will continue. The debate should focus on the link between those advances and broad measures of productivity growth. Consistent with early periods of technological diffusion, the time period between general technological advances and their impact on productivity may be long; the chapter extends these arguments to contemporary discussions of AI and machine learning. While it shares concerns about macroeconomic headwinds to growth, the chapter emphasizes microeconomic policies to support intangible capital accumulation and its diffusion to general productivity, and finds for the techno-optimists.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Prospects for Economic Growth in the United States , pp. 115 - 131Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Agrawal, Ajay, Galasso, Alberto, and Oettl, Alexander, 2017. “Roads and Innovation.” Review of Economics and Statistics 99 (3), 417–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, Kenneth, 1962. “Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention.” In Nelson, Richard R. (ed.), The Rate and Direction of Invention Activity, 609–26. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Atkeson, Andrew, and Kehoe, Patrick, 2007. “Modeling the Transition to a New Economy: Lessons from Two Technological Revolutions.” American Economic Review 97 (1) 64–88.Google Scholar
Barro, Robert J., 1991. “Economic Growth in a Cross-Section of Countries.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 106 (2), 407–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartelsman, Eric, Haltiwanger, John, and Scarpetta, Stefano, 2013. “Cross-Country Differences in Productivity: The Role of Allocation and Selection.” American Economic Review 103 (1), 305–34.Google Scholar
Bloom, Nicholas, Jones, Charles I., van Reenen, John, and Webb, Michael, 2017. “Are Ideas Getting Harder to Find?” NBER Working Paper No. 23782. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, Nicholas, Sadun, Raffaella, and van Reenen, John, 2017. “Management As Technology.” NBER Working Paper No. 22327. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Bloom, Nicholas, and van Reenen, John, 2007. “Measuring and Explaining Management Practices Across Firms.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 122 (4), 1351–1408.Google Scholar
Bresnahan, Timothy F., Brynjolfsson, Erik, and Hitt, Lorin, 2002. “Information Technology, Workplace Organization, and the Demand for Skilled Labor: Firm-Level Evidence.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 (1), 339–76.Google Scholar
Bresnahan, Timothy F., and Trajtenberg, Manuel, 1995. “General Purpose Technologies: ‘Engines of Growth’?” Journal of Econometrics, Annals of Econometrics 65 (1), 83–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brynjolfsson, Erik, Hitt, Lorin, and Yang, Shinkyu, 2002. “Intangible Assets: Computers and Organizational Capital.” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 33 (1), 137–98.Google Scholar
Brynjolfsson, Erik, and McAfee, Andrew, 2014. The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. W.W. Norton, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Brynjolfsson, Erik, Rock, Daniel, and Syverson, Chad, 2017. “Artificial Intelligence and the Modern Productivity Paradox: A Clash of Expectations and Statistics.” NBER Working Paper No. 24001. National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Byrne, David M., Fernald, John G., and Reinsdorf, Marshall B., 2016. “Does the United States Have a Productivity Slowdown or a Measurement Problem?” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 47 (1), 109–82.Google Scholar
Christensen, Peter, Gillingham, Kenneth, and Nordhaus, William, 2016. “Uncertainty in Forecasts of Long-Run Productivity Growth.” Working Paper. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Cogan, John F., Hubbard, Glenn, Taylor, John B., and Warsh, Kevin, 2017. “On the Prospects for Higher Economic Growth.” Working Paper. Hoover Institution, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
Cowen, Tyler, 2011. The Great Stagnation: How America Ate All the Low-Hanging Fruit of Modern History, Got Sick, and Will (Eventually) Feel Better. Penguin Group, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Cunningham, Colleen, Ederer, Florian, and Song, Ma, 2018. “Killer Acquisitions.” Working Paper. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
David, Paul, 1991. “Computer and Dynamo: The Modern Productivity Paradox in a Not-Too-Distant Mirror.” In OECD, Technology and Productivity: The Challenge for Economic Policy, 315–47. OECD, Paris, France.Google Scholar
Goolsbee, Austan, Hubbard, Glenn, and Ganz, Amy, 2019. “A Policy Agenda to Develop Human Capital for the Modern Economy.” In Kearney, Melissa S. and Ganz, Amy (eds.), Expanding Economic Opportunity for More Americans, 16–36. Aspen Institute, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Gordon, Robert J., 2016. The Rise and Fall of American Growth: The U.S. Standard of Living Since the Civil War. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ and Oxford, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graetz, Georg, and Michaels, Guy, 2015. “Robots at Work.” Discussion Paper No. 1335. Centre for Economic Performance, London, UK.Google Scholar
Henderson, Rebecca, 2006. “The Innovator’s Dilemma as a Problem of Organizational Competence.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 23 (1), 5–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Himel, Samuel, and Seamans, Robert, 2017. “Artificial Intelligence, Incentives to Innovate, and Competition Policy.” Antitrust Chronicle 1 (3), 1–10.Google Scholar
Holmes, Thomas J., Levine, David K., and Schmitz, James A., 2012. “Monopoly and the Incentive to Innovate When Adoption Involves Switchover Disruptions.” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 4 (3), 1–33.Google Scholar
Hortacsu, Ali, and Syverson, Chad, 2015. “The Ongoing Evolution of U.S. Retail: A Format Tug-of-War.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 29 (4), 89–112.Google Scholar
Hubbard, Glenn, 2016. “Supporting Work, Inclusion, and Mass Prosperity.” In Strain, Michael R. (ed.), The U.S. Labor Market: Questions and Challenge for Public Policy. AEI Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Hubbard, Glenn, and Kane, Timothy, 2013. Balance: The Economics of Great Powers from Rome to Modern America. Simon and Schuster, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Keynes, John Maynard, 1930. “Economic Possibilities for Our Grandchildren.” In Keynes, John Maynard, Essays in Persuasion, 358–73. W.W. Norton, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Lincoln, Abraham, 1858. “Lecture on Discoveries and Inventions.” Speech to the Young Men’s Improvement Association of Bloomington, Illinois, April 6.Google Scholar
McAfee, Andrew, and Brynjolfsson, Eric, 2017. Machine, Platform, Crowd: Harnessing Our Digital Future. W.W. Norton, New York, NY.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Deirdre N., 2016. Bourgeois Equality. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
McKinsey Global Institute, 2018. Solving the Productivity Puzzle: The Role of Demand and the Promise of Digitization. McKinsey & Company, New York, NY.Google Scholar
Mokyr, Joel, Vickers, Chris, and Ziebarth, Nicolas L., 2015. “The History of Technological Anxiety and the Future of Economic Growth: Is This Time Different?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 29 (3), 31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Academy of Engineering, 2015. Making Value for America: Embracing the Future of Manufacturing, Technology, and Work. National Academies Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Powell, Jerome H, 2018. “Monetary Policy in a Changing Economy.” Remarks at the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Symposium on Changing Market Structure and Implications for Monetary Policy, August 23–25, Jackson Hole, WY.Google Scholar
Solow, Robert M, 1987. “We’d Better Watch Out.” New York Times Book Review, July 12, 36.Google Scholar
Summers, Lawrence H., 2013. “Why Stagnation Might Prove to Be the New Normal.” Remarks at the 14th International Monetary Fund Annual Research Conference, November 18, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Syverson, Chad, 2011. “What Determines Productivity?” Journal of Economic Literature 49 (2), 326–65.Google Scholar
Syverson, Chad, 2013. “Will History Repeat Itself? Comments on ‘Is the Information Technology Over?’” International Productivity Monitor 25 (Spring), 37–40.Google Scholar
Syverson, Chad, 2017. “Challenges to Mismeasurement Explanations for the U.S. Productivity Slowdown.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 31 (2), 165–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tirole, Jean, 2017. Economics for the Common Good. Princeton University Press. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Van Reenen, John, 2018. “Increasing Differences between Firms: Market Power and the Macro-Economy.” Remarks at the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Symposium on Changing Market Structure and Implications for Monetary Policy, August 23–25, Jackson Hole, WY.Google Scholar
Yared, Pierre, 2019. “Rising Government Debt: Causes and Solutions for a Decades-Old Trend.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 33 (2), 115–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar