Book contents
- Prosecutors, Voters, and the Criminalisation of Corruption in Latin America
- Cambridge Studies in Law and Society
- Prosecutors, Voters, and the Criminalisation of Corruption in Latin America
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Causes
- Part II Public Reactions
- Part III Conclusions
- Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in Law and Society
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 April 2023
Book contents
- Prosecutors, Voters, and the Criminalisation of Corruption in Latin America
- Cambridge Studies in Law and Society
- Prosecutors, Voters, and the Criminalisation of Corruption in Latin America
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- Part I Causes
- Part II Public Reactions
- Part III Conclusions
- Bibliography
- Index
- Cambridge Studies in Law and Society
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Prosecutors, Voters and the Criminalization of Corruption in Latin AmericaThe Case of Lava Jato, pp. 282 - 299Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
van Aaken, Anne, Salzberger, Eli, and Voigt, Stefan. 2004. “The Prosecution of Public Figures and the Separation of Powers: Confusion within the Executive Branch – A Conceptual Framework.” Constitutional Political Economy 15(3): 261–280.Google Scholar
Abers, Rebecca Neaera. 2019. “Bureaucratic Activism: Pursuing Environmentalism Inside the Brazilian State.” Latin American Politics and Society 61(2): 21–44.Google Scholar
Adebanwi, Wale, and Obadare, Ebenezer. 2011. “When Corruption Fights Back: Democracy and Elite Interest in Nigeria’s Anti-corruption War.” Journal of Modern African Studies 49(2): 185–213.Google Scholar
Agerberg, Mattias. 2019. “The Curse of Knowledge? Education, Corruption, and Politics.” Political Behavior 41(2): 369–399.Google Scholar
Agger, Robert E., Goldstein, Marshall N., and Pearl, Stanley A.. 1961. “Political Cynicism: Measurement and Meaning.” Journal of Politics 23(3): 477–506.Google Scholar
Aguiar Aguilar, Azul. 2012. “Institutional Changes in the Public Prosecutor’s Office: The Cases of Mexico, Chile and Brazil.” Mexican Law Review 4(2): 261–289.Google Scholar
Aguiar Aguilar, Azul. 2015. “The Public Prosecutor: The Achilles’ Heel of the Rule of Law in Mexico.” Revista Mexicana de Análisis Politico y Administración Pública 4(1): 159–172.Google Scholar
Aguiar Aguilar, Azul. 2019. “Reforms of the Public Prosecutor’s Office in Brazil, Chile and Mexico: The Role of Justice Sector Interest Groups.” In Beyond High Courts: The Justice Complex in Latin America, eds. Ingram, Matthew and Kapiszewski, Diana. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Albertson, Bethany, and Kushner Gadarian, Shana. 2015. Anxious Politics: Democratic Citizenship in a Threatening World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alonso, Angela, and Mische, Ann. 2017. “Changing Repertoires and Partisan Ambivalence in the New Brazilian Protests.” Bulletin of Latin American Research 36(2): 144–159.Google Scholar
Andersen, Christopher J., and Tverdova, Yuliya V.. 2003. “Corruption, Political Allegiances, and Attitudes toward Government in Contemporary Democracies.” American Journal of Political Science 47(1): 91–109.Google Scholar
Anduiza, Eva, Gallego, Aina, and Muñoz, Jordi. 2013. “Turning a Blind Eye.” Comparative Political Studies 46(12): 1664–1692.Google Scholar
Andvig, Jens, and Moene, Karl Ove. 1990. “How Corruption May Corrupt.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 13(1): 63–76.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, Karina. 2010. “More Power, More Rights? The Supreme Court and Society in Mexico.” In Cultures of Legality, eds. Couso, Javier, Huneeus, Alexandra, and Sieder, Rachel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Anti-corruption Center. 2009. Tracking Progress of Grand Corruption Cases. U4 Expert Answers Series.Google Scholar
Arantes, Rogério. 2011. “The Federal Police and the Ministério Público.” In Corruption and Democracy in Brazil: The Struggle for Accountability, eds. Power, Timothy and Taylor, Matthew. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Arias, Eric et al. 2019. “Information Provision, Voter Coordination, and Electoral Accountability: Evidence from Mexican Social Networks.” American Political Science Review 113(2): 475–498.Google Scholar
Aytaç, S. Erdem, and Stokes, Susan C.. 2019. Why Bother? Rethinking Participation in Elections and Protests. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bakiner, Onur. 2020. “Endogenous Sources of Judicial Power: Parapolitics and the Supreme Court of Colombia.” Comparative Politics 52(4): 603–624.Google Scholar
Banks, Antoine J., White, Ismail K., and McKenzie, Brian D.. 2019. “Black Politics: How Anger Influences the Political Actions Blacks Pursue to Reduce Racial Inequality.” Political Behavior 41(4): 917–943.Google Scholar
Banuri, Sheheryar, and Keefer, Philip. 2013. Intrinsic Motivation, Effort and the Call to Public Service. Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar
Baraybar-Hidalgo, Viviana. 2020. “When and Why Do Voters Punish Corruption? The Role of Perceptions of Negative Externalities in Electoral Accountability.” Unpublished MPhil dissertation, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Barbacetto, Gianni, Gomez, Peter, Travaglio, Marco, and Davigo, Piercamillo. 2012. Mani Pulite. Milan: Chiarelettere.Google Scholar
Basabe-Serrano, Santiago. 2009. “Ecuador: Reforma constitucional, nuevos actores políticos y viejas prácticas partidistas.” Revista de Ciencia Política 29(2): 381–406.Google Scholar
Bauhr, Monika, and Grimes, Marcia. 2014. “Indignation or Resignation: The Implications of Transparency for Societal Accountability.” Governance 27(2): 291–320.Google Scholar
Bennett, Colin J. 1991. “What Is Policy Convergence and What Causes It?” British Journal of Political Science 21(2): 215–233.Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. 1983. The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham: Deontology. Together with a Table of the Springs of Action and the Article on Utilitarianism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Berghoff, Hartmut. 2018. “‘Organised Irresponsibility’? The Siemens Corruption Scandal of the 1990s and 2000s.” Business History 60(3): 423–445.Google Scholar
Bersch, Katherine. 2019. When Democracies Deliver. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bertossa, Carlo. 2003. “Difficulties Encountered by the Judiciary: A Summary of Key Issues.” In Effective Prosecution of Corruption, ed. Asian Development Bank. Manila: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
Binder, Alberto. 2000. Ideas y materiales para la reforma de la justicia penal. Buenos Aires: Ad Hoc.Google Scholar
Bischoff, James L. 2003. “Reforming the Criminal Procedure System in Latin America.” Texas Hispanic Journal of Law & Policy 9: 27–54.Google Scholar
Blais, André et al. 2010. “Political Judgments, Perceptions of Facts, and Partisan Effects.” Electoral Studies 29(1): 1–12.Google Scholar
Boas, Taylor C., Daniel Hidalgo, F., and Melo, Marcus André. 2019. “Norms versus Action: Why Voters Fail to Sanction Malfeasance in Brazil.” American Journal of Political Science 63(2): 385–400.Google Scholar
Botero, Sandra et al. 2015. “Says Who? An Experiment on Allegations of Corruption and Credibility of Sources.” Political Research Quarterly 68(3): 493–504.Google Scholar
Botero, Sandra, Brinks, Daniel, and Gonzalez-Ocantos, Ezequiel, eds. 2022. The Limits of Judicialization: From Progress to Backlash in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowler, Shaun, and Karp, Jeffrey A.. 2004. “Politicians, Scandals, and Trust in Government.” Political Behavior 26(3): 271–287.Google Scholar
Boyd, Christina, Nelson, Michael, Ostrander, Ian, and Boldt, Ethan. 2021. The Politics of Federal Prosecution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brader, Ted. 2005. “Striking a Responsive Chord: How Political Ads Motivate and Persuade Voters by Appealing to Emotions.” American Journal of Political Science 49(2): 388–405.Google Scholar
Brader, Ted. 2006. Campaigns for Hearts and Minds: How Emotional Appeals in Political Ads Work. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Brader, Ted, Groendendyk, Eric W., and Valentino, Nicholas A.. 2010. “Fight or Flight? When Politics Threats Arouse Public Anger and Fear.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.Google Scholar
Braun, Dietmar, and Gilardi, Fabrizio. 2006. “Taking ‘Galton’s Problem’ Seriously.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 18(3): 298–322.Google Scholar
Breitenstein, Sofia. 2019. “Choosing the Crook: A Conjoint Experiment on Voting for Corrupt Politicians.” Research & Politics 6(1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brett, Roddy. 2016. “Peace without Social Reconciliation? Understanding the Trial of Generals Ríos Montt and Rodriguez Sánchez in the Wake of Guatemala’s Genocide.” Journal of Genocide Research 18(2–3): 285–303.Google Scholar
Brinks, Daniel. 2008. The Judicial Response to Police Killings in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brinks, Daniel, Levitsky, Steven, and Murillo, María Victoria eds. 2020. The Politics of Institutional Weakness in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brinks, Daniel M., Levitsky, Steven, and Murillo, María Victoria. 2019. Understanding Institutional Weakness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Buciuni, Giulio, and Finotto, Vladi. 2016. “Innovation in Global Value Chains: Co-Location of Production and Development in Italian Low-Tech Industries.” Regional Studies 50(12): 1–14.Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, and Smith, Alastair. 2011. The Dictator’s Handbook: Why Bad Behavior Is Almost Always Good Politics. New York: PublicAffairs.Google Scholar
Burt, Jo-Marie. 2016. “From Heaven to Hell in Ten Days: The Genocide Trial in Guatemala.” Journal of Genocide Research 18(2–3): 143–169.Google Scholar
Bybee, Keith J. 2010. All Judges Are Political, Except When They Are Not. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Cabot, Diego. 2018. Los cuadernos. Cómo fue la investigación secreta del caso de corrupción más importante de la historia argentina. Buenos Aires: Sudamericana.Google Scholar
Cappella, Joseph, and Jamieson, Kathleen. 1996. “News Frames, Political Cynicism, and Media Cynicism.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 546(1): 71–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caramani, Daniele. 2017. “Will vs. Reason: The Populist and Technocratic Forms of Political Representation and Their Critique to Party Government.” American Political Science Review 111(1): 54–67.Google Scholar
de Carli, Carla et al. 2011. Lavagem de dinheiro: Prevenção e controle penal. Porto Alegre: Verbo Juridico.Google Scholar
Carnes, Nicholas, and Lupu, Noam. 2016. “Do Voters Dislike Working-Class Candidates? Voter Biases and the Descriptive Underrepresentation of the Working Class.” American Political Science Review 110(4): 832–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnevale, Peter J. D., and Isen, Alice. 1986. “The Influence of Positive Affect and Visual Access on the Discovery of Integrative Solutions in Bilateral Negotiation.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 37(1): 1–13.Google Scholar
Carothers, Christopher. 2022. Corruption Control in Authoritarian Regimes: Lessons from East Asia. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carr, Indira, and Outhwaite, Opi. 2008. “The OECD Anti-Bribery Convention 10 Years On.” Manchester Journal of International Law 5(1): 3–35.Google Scholar
Casey, Gregory. 1974. “The Supreme Court and Myth: An Empirical Investigation.” Law & Society Review 8(3): 385–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavise, Leonard L. 2007. “The Transition from the Inquisitorial to the Accusatorial System of Trial Procedure: Why Some Latin American Lawyers Hesitate.” Wayne Law Review 53(2): 785–816.Google Scholar
Chang, Eric C. C., and Chu, Yun-han. 2006. “Corruption and Trust: Exceptionalism in Asian Democracies?” The Journal of Politics 68(2): 259–271.Google Scholar
Chang, Eric C. C., Golden, Miriam A., and Hill, Seth J.. 2010. “Legislative Malfeasance and Political Accountability.” World Politics 62(2): 177–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chemin, Rodrigo. 2017. Mãos Limpas e Lava Jato: A corrupção se olha no espelho. Porto Alegre: CDG.Google Scholar
Chong, Alberto, de La O, Ana L., Karlan, Dean, and Wantchekon, Leonard. 2015. “Does Corruption Information Inspire the Fight or Quash the Hope? A Field Experiment in Mexico on Voter Turnout, Choice, and Party Identification.” Journal of Politics 77(1): 55–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Citrin, Jack. 1974. “Comment: The Political Relevance of Trust in Government.” American Political Science Review 68(3): 973–988.Google Scholar
Comaroff, Jean, and Comaroff, John L.. 2006. Law and Disorder in the Postcolony. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Comisión Andina de Juristas. 2003. El Debido Proceso en las decisiones de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos. Lima: CAJ.Google Scholar
Conaghan, Catherine M. 2012. “Prosecuting Presidents: The Politics within Ecuador’s Corruption Cases.” Journal of Latin American Studies 44(4): 649–678.Google Scholar
Contesse, Jorge, and Gallagher, Janice. 2022. “Critical Disconnects: Progressive Jurisprudence and Tenacious Impunity in Mexico.” In The Limits of Judicialization: From Progress to Backlash in Latin America, eds. Brinks, Daniel M., Botero, Sandra, and Gonzalez-Ocantos, Ezequiel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coppedge, Michael. 2005. “Examining Democratic Deterioration in Venezuela Through Nested Inference.” In The Third Wave of Democratization in Latin America: Advances and Setbacks, eds. Hagopian, Frances and Mainwaring, Scott. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coppedge, Michael. 2012. Democratization and Research Methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Corbacho, Ana, Gingerich, Daniel W., Oliveros, Virginia, and Ruiz-Vega, Mauricio. 2016. “Corruption as a Self-Fulfilling Prophecy: Evidence from a Survey Experiment in Costa Rica.” American Journal of Political Science 60(4): 1077–1092.Google Scholar
Coslovsky, Salo. 2011. “Relational Regulation in the Brazilian Ministério Publico: The Organizational Basis of Regulatory Responsiveness.” Regulation and Governance 5(1): 70–89.Google Scholar
Couso, Javier. 2010. “The Transformation of Constitutional Discourse and the Judicialization of Politics in Latin America.” In Cultures of Legality, eds. Couso, Javier, Huneeus, Alexandra, and Sieder, Rachel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cubas, Víctor. 2003. El nuevo proceso penal peruano: Teoría y práctica de su implementación. Lima: Palestra Editores.Google Scholar
Cuéllar, Mariano F., and Stephenson, Matthew. 2020. “Taming Systemic Corruption: The American Experience and Its Implications for Contemporary Debates.” Unpublished Manuscript.Google Scholar
Cyr, Jennifer. 2016. “The Pitfalls and Promise of Focus Groups as a Data Collection Method.” Sociological Methods & Research 45(2): 231–259.Google Scholar
Cyr, Jennifer. 2019. Focus Groups for the Social Science Researcher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dargent, Eduardo. 2005. “Juzgando a los señores: Reflexiones sobre los procesos anticorrupción en el Perú.” In El Pacto Infame. Lima: Red para el desarollo de las ciencias sociales en el Perú.Google Scholar
Dargent, Eduardo. 2014. Technocracy and Democracy in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dargent, Eduardo, and Muñoz, Paula. 2016. “Peru: A Close Win for Continuity.” Journal of Democracy 27(4): 145–158.Google Scholar
Dargent, Eduardo, and Rousseau, Stephanie. 2021. “Peru 2020: El quiebre de la continuidad?” Revista de Ciencia Política 41(2): 377–400.Google Scholar
Da Ros, Luciano. 2014. Mayors in the Dock: Judicial Responses to Local Corruption in Brazil. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago.Google Scholar
Da Ros, Luciano, and Taylor, Matthew. 2022a. Brazilian Politics on Trial: Corruption and Reform under Democracy. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Da Ros, Luciano, and Taylor, Matthew. 2022b. “Kickbacks, Crackdown and Backlash: Legal Accountability in the Lava Jato Investigation.” In The Limits of Judicialization: From Progress to Backlash in Latin America, eds. Brinks, Daniel M., Botero, Sandra, and Gonzalez-Ocantos, Ezequiel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Defensoría del Pueblo. 2008. Decimosegundo Informe Anual de la Defensoría del Pueblo. Lima: Defensoría del Pueblo.Google Scholar
Defensoría del Pueblo. 2017. Informe Anual 2017. Actividades y actuaciones llevadas a cabo a lo largo del año 2017. Lima: Defensoría del Pueblo.Google Scholar
Denzin, Norma, and Ryan, Katherine. 2007. “Qualitative Methods.” In The SAGE Handbook of Social Science Methodology, eds. Outhwaite, William and Turner, Stephen. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Dervan, Lucian E., and Podgor, Ellen S.. 2016. “Investigating and Prosecuting White-Collar Criminals.” In Oxford Handbook of White-Collar Crime, eds. Van Slyke, Shanna R., Benson, Michael L., and Cullen, Francis T.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Diehl, M., and Stroebe, W.. 1987. “Productivity Loss in Brainstorming Groups: Toward the Solution of a Riddle.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53(3): 497–509.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul, and Powell, Walter. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48(2): 147–160.Google Scholar
Dunning, Thad et al. 2019. “Voter Information Campaigns and Political Accountability: Cumulative Findings from a Preregistered Meta-Analysis of Coordinated Trials.” Science Advances 5(7): 1–10.Google Scholar
Durand, Francisco. 2018. Odebrecht: La empresa que capturaba gobiernos. Lima: Fondo Editorial PUCP.Google Scholar
Easton, David. 1975. “A Re-Assessment of the Concept of Political Support.” British Journal of Political Science 5(4): 435–457.Google Scholar
Eilstrup-Sangiovanni, Mette, and Sharman, Jason C.. 2022. Vigilantes beyond Borders: NGOs as Enforcers of International Law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Epp, Charles R. 1998. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Epp, Charles R. 2009. Making Rights Real: Activists, Bureaucrats, and the Creation of the Legalistic State. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, and Knight, Jack. 1998. The Choices Justices Make. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Falcone, Giovanni, and Turone, Giuliano. 1982. “Tecniche di indagine in materia di mafia.” Rivista di studi e ricerche sulla criminalità organizzata 1(1): 116–153.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D. 1999. “Electoral Accountability and the Control of Politicians: Selecting Good Types versus Sanctioning Poor Performance.” In Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, eds. Przeworski, Adam, Stokes, Susan C., and Manin, Bernard. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, John. 2002. “Judicializing Politics, Politicizing Law.” Law and Contemporary Problems 65(3): 41–68.Google Scholar
Fernández-Vázquez, Pablo, Barberá, Pablo, and Rivero, Gonzalo. 2016. “Rooting Out Corruption or Rooting for Corruption? The Heterogeneous Electoral Consequences of Scandals.” Political Science Research and Methods 4(2): 379–397.Google Scholar
Ferrajoli, Luigi. 2013. Poderes salvajes: La crisis de la democracia constitucional. Minima Trotta.Google Scholar
Ferraz, Claudio, and Finan, Frederico. 2008. “Exposing Corrupt Politicians: The Effects of Brazil’s Publicly Released Audits on Electoral Outcomes.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 123(2): 703–745.Google Scholar
Figueroa, Valentín. 2021. “Political Corruption Cycles: High-Frequency Evidence from Argentina’s Notebooks Scandal.” Comparative Political Studies 54(3–4): 482–517.Google Scholar
Finkel, Jodi. 2008. Judicial Reform as Political Insurance: Argentina, Peru, and Mexico in the 1990s. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Fisman, Raymond, and Golden, Miriam. 2017. Corruption: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fouirnaies, Alexander, and Fowler, Anthony. 2021. “Do Campaign Contributions Buy Favorable Policies? Evidence from the Insurance Industry.” Political Science Research and Methods 10(1): 18–32.Google Scholar
Freeman, Will. 2020. “Sidestepping the Constitution: Executive Aggrandizement in Latin America and East Central Europe.” Constitutional Studies 6: 35–58.Google Scholar
Gailmard, Sean, and Patty, John W.. 2007. “Slackers and Zealots: Civil Service, Policy Discretion, and Bureaucratic Expertise.” Journal of Politics 51(4): 873–889.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Janice. 2017. “The Last Mile Problem: Activists, Advocates, and the Struggle for Justice in Domestic Courts.” Comparative Political Studies 50(12): 1666–1698.Google Scholar
Gathii, James Thuo. 2019. “Recharacterizing Corruption to Encompass Illicit Financial Flows.” AJIL Unbound 113: 336–340.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L., and Caldeira, Gregory A.. 2009. Citizens, Courts, and Confirmations: Positivity Theory and the Judgments of the American People. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L., Caldeira, Gregory A., and Baird, Vanessa A.. 1998. “On the Legitimacy of National High Courts.” American Political Science Review 92(2): 343–358.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L., Caldeira, Gregory A., and Spence, Lester Kenyatta. 2003. “Measuring Attitudes toward the United States Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 47(2): 354–367.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L., Caldeira, Gregory A., and Spence, Lester Kenyatta. 2005. “Why Do People Accept Public Policies They Oppose? Testing Legitimacy Theory with a Survey-Based Experiment.” Political Research Quarterly 58(2): 187–201.Google Scholar
Gillman, Howard. 1999. “The Court as an Idea, Not a Building (or a Game): Interpretive Institutionalism and the Analysis of Supreme Court Decision-Making.” In Supreme Court Decision-Making, eds. Clayton, Cornell W. and Gillman, Howard. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Gingerich, Daniel W. 2009. “Corruption and Political Decay: Evidence from Bolivia.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 4(1): 1–34.Google Scholar
Gingerich, Daniel W. 2013. Political Institutions and Party-Directed Corruption in South America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Julie H., Lerner, Jennifer S., and Tetlock, Philip E.. 1999. “Rage and Reason: The Psychology of the Intuitive Prosecutor.” European Journal of Social Psychology 29(5–6): 781–795.Google Scholar
Gonzalez Ocantos, Ezequiel, de Jonge, Chad Kiewiet, and Nickerson, David W.. 2014. “The Conditionality of Vote-Buying Norms: Experimental Evidence from Latin America.” American Journal of Political Science 58(1): 197–211.Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Ocantos, Ezequiel. 2016a. Shifting Legal Visions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Ocantos, Ezequiel. 2016b. “Evaluations of Human Rights Trials and Trust in Judicial Institutions: Evidence from Fujimori’s Trial in Peru.” The International Journal of Human Rights 20(4): 445–470.Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Ocantos, Ezequiel. 2020. The Politics of Transitional Justice in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gonzalez‐Ocantos, Ezequiel, and Dinas, Elias. 2019. “Compensation and Compliance: Sources of Public Acceptance of the U.K. Supreme Court’s Brexit Decision.” Law & Society Review 53(3): 889–919.Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Ocantos, Ezequiel, and LaPorte, Jody. 2021. “Process Tracing and the Problem of Missing Data.” Sociological Methods & Research 50(3): 1407–1435Google Scholar
Green, Paul E., Krieger, Abba M., and Wind, Yoram. 2001. “Thirty Years of Conjoint Analysis: Reflections and Prospects.” Interfaces 31(3 suppl.): S56–S73.Google Scholar
Groenendyk, Eric. 2011. “Current Emotion Research in Political Science: How Emotions Help Democracy Overcome Its Collective Action Problem.” Emotion Review 3(4): 455–463.Google Scholar
Grosskopf, Anke, and Mondak, Jeffery J.. 1998. “Do Attitudes toward Specific Supreme Court Decisions Matter? The Impact of Webster and Texas v. Johnson on Public Confidence in the Supreme Court.” Political Research Quarterly 51(3): 633–654.Google Scholar
Guarnieri, Carlo. 2003. “Courts as an Instrument of Horizontal Accountability: The Case of Latin Europe.” In Democracy and the Rule of Law, eds. Maravall, Jose M. and Przeworski, Adam. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gulzar, Saad, Rueda, Miguel R., and Ruiz, Nelson A.. 2022. “Do Campaign Contribution Limits Curb the Influence of Money in Politics?” American Journal of Political Science 66(4): 932–946Google Scholar
Guthmann, Yanina. 2019. “El Ministerio Público Fiscal (MPF) en Argentina: Actors y prácticas. Apuntes de investigación.” Revista Argentina de Ciencia Política 1(2): 59–80.Google Scholar
Hagopian, Frances. 2016 “Delegative Democracy Revisited: Brazil’s Accountability Paradox.” Journal of Democracy 27(3): 119–128.Google Scholar
Hainmueller, Jens, and Hopkins, Daniel J.. 2015. “The Hidden American Immigration Consensus: A Conjoint Analysis of Attitudes toward Immigrants.” American Journal of Political Science 59(3): 529–548.Google Scholar
Hainmueller, Jens, Hopkins, Daniel J., and Yamamoto, Teppei. 2014. “Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multidimensional Choices via Stated Preference Experiments.” Political Analysis 22(1): 1–30.Google Scholar
Hakhverdian, Armen, and Mayne, Quinton. 2012. “Institutional Trust, Education, and Corruption: A Micro-Macro Interactive Approach.” The Journal of Politics 74(3): 739–750.Google Scholar
Hammergren, Linn. 2008. “Twenty-Five Years of Latin American Judicial Reforms: Achievements, Disappointments, and Emerging Issues.” Whitehead Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations 9(1): 89–104.Google Scholar
Hellwig, Timothy, and Samuels, David. 2007. “Voting in Open Economies.” Comparative Political Studies 40(3): 283–306.Google Scholar
Helmke, Gretchen. 2005. Courts under Constraints. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Helmke, Gretchen, Jeong, YeonKyung, Kim, Jae-Eun, and Ozturk, Seda. 2019. Upending Impunity: Explaining Post-Tenure Presidential Prosecutions in Latin America. Mimeo.Google Scholar
Helmke, Gretchen, and Levitsky, Steven eds. 2006. Informal Institutions and Democracy: Lessons from Latin America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Hetherington, Marc J. 1998. “The Political Relevance of Political Trust.” The American Political Science Review 92(4): 791–808.Google Scholar
Hetherington, Marc J., and Smith, Joseph L.. 2007. “Issue Preferences and Evaluations of the U.S. Supreme Court.” Public Opinion Quarterly 71(1): 40–66.Google Scholar
Hibbing, John R., and Theiss-Morse, Elizabeth. 1995. Congress as Public Enemy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hilbink, Lisa. 2007. Judges beyond Politics in Democracy and Dictatorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hilbink, Lisa. 2012. “The Origins of Positive Judicial Independence.” World Politics 64(4): 587.Google Scholar
Hilti, Martin. 2021. Corporate Criminal Liability: Incomplete Legislation, Inadequate Enforcement, Serious Lack of Transparency. Lausanne: Transparency Switzerland.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Valerie J. 2003. Public Reaction to Supreme Court Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holland, Alisha C. 2021. Creative Construction: The Rise and Stall of Mass Infrastructure in Latin America. Unpublished Manuscript.Google Scholar
Hollis-Brusky, Amanda. 2015. Ideas with Consequences: The Federalist Society and the Conservative Counterrevolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch. 2006. Lost in Transition: Bold Ambitions, Limited Results for Human Rights under Fox. New York: Human Rights Watch.Google Scholar
Hunter, Wendy, and Power, Timothy J.. 2019. “Bolsonaro and Brazil’s Illiberal Backlash.” Journal of Democracy 30(1): 68–82.Google Scholar
Ingram, Matthew C. 2015. Crafting Courts in New Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
International Crisis Group. 2011. Learning to Walk without a Crutch: An Assessment of the International Commission against Impunity in Guatemala.Google Scholar
Isbell, Linda M., Ottati, Victor C., and Burns, Kathleen C.. 2006. “Affect and Politics: Effects on Judgment, Processing, and Information Seeking.” In Feeling Politics, ed. Redlawsk, David P.. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Iversen, Torben, and Soskice, David. 2019. Democracy and Prosperity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, John D., and Summers, Sarah J.. 2012. The Internationalisation of Criminal Evidence the Internationalisation of Criminal Evidence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Janis, Irving. 1982. Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascos. 2nd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Joly, Eva. 2003. “Coping with High-Profile Judicial Cases: Experience of Prosecutors from Asia and the Pacific, and from Europe.” In Effective Prosecution of Corruption, ed. Asian Development Bank. Manila: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
Jorge, Guillermo. 2019. “The Impact of Corporate Liability on Corruption in Latin America.” AJIL Unbound 113: 320–325.Google Scholar
Justicia Viva. 2007. Balance del subsistema anticorrupción a seis años de su creación (2000–2006). Lima: Justicia Viva.Google Scholar
Kapiszewski, Diana. 2012. High Courts and Economic Governance in Argentina and Brazil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Daniel, and Vicente, Pedro C.. 2011. “Legal Corruption.” Economics & Politics 23(2): 195–219.Google Scholar
Kim, Hunjoon, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 2010. “Explaining the Deterrence Effect of Human Rights Prosecutions for Transitional Countries.” International Studies Quarterly 54(4): 939–963.Google Scholar
Kirchheimer, Otto. 1961. Political Justice: The Use of Legal Procedure for Political Ends. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Klašnja, Marko, Little, Andrew T., and Tucker, Joshua A.. 2016. “Political Corruption Traps.” Political Science Research and Methods 6(3): 413–428.Google Scholar
Klašnja, Marko, Lupu, Noam, and Tucker, Joshua A.. 2021. “When Do Voters Sanction Corrupt Politicians?” Journal of Experimental Political Science 8(2): 161–171Google Scholar
Klašnja, Marko, and Tucker, Joshua A.. 2013. “The Economy, Corruption, and the Vote: Evidence from Experiments in Sweden and Moldova.” Electoral Studies 32(3): 536–543.Google Scholar
Klinkhammer, Julian. 2013. “On the Dark Side of the Code: Organizational Challenges to an Effective Anti-corruption Strategy.” Crime, Law and Social Change 60(2): 191–208.Google Scholar
Krosnick, Jon, and Kinder, Donald. 1990. “Altering the Foundations of Support for the President through Priming.” American Political Science Review 82(2): 497–512.Google Scholar
Kunda, Ziva. 1990. “The Case for Motivated Reasoning.” Psychological Bulletin 108(3): 480.Google Scholar
Kupatadze, Alexander. 2016. “Georgia’s Break with the Past.” Journal of Democracy 27(1): 110–123.Google Scholar
Lagunes, Paul, and Svejnar, Jan eds. 2020. Corruption and the Lava Jato Scandal in Latin America. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Langer, Máximo. 2004. “From Legal Transplants to Legal Translations: The Globalization of Plea Bargaining and the Americanization Thesis in Criminal Procedure.” Harvard International Law Journal 45(1): 1–64.Google Scholar
Langer, Màximo. 2007. “Revolution in Latin American Criminal Procedure.” The American Journal of Comparative Law 55: 617–676.Google Scholar
Leeper, Thomas J., Hobolt, Sara B., and Tilley, James. 2020. “Measuring Subgroup Preferences in Conjoint Experiments.” Political Analysis 28(2): 207–221.Google Scholar
Lerner, Jennifer S., and Keltner, Dacher. 2001. “Fear, Anger, and Risk.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81(1): 146–159.Google Scholar
Lessa, Francesca. 2019. “Operation Condor on Trial: Justice for Transnational Human Rights Crimes in South America.” Journal of Latin American Studies 51(2): 409–439.Google Scholar
Levine, John M., and Moreland, Richard L.. 1998. “Small Groups.” In The Handbook of Social Psychology, eds. Gilbert, D., Fiske, S., and Lindzey, G.. Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Levine, John M., Moreland, Richard L., and Choi, Hoon-Seok. 2001. “Group Socialization and Newcomer Innovation.” In Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes, eds. Hogg, Michael A. and Tindale, Scott R.. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven. 2013. “Peru: The Challenges of a Democracy without Parties.” In Constructing Democratic Governance in Latin America, eds. Dominguez, Jorge and Shifter, Michael. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Cameron, Maxwell A.. 2003. “Democracy without Parties? Political Parties and Regime Change in Fujimori’s Peru.” Latin American Politics and Society 45(3): 1–33.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Murillo, María Victoria eds. 2005. Argentine Democracy: The Politics of Institutional Weakness. University Park: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Murillo, María Victoria 2009. “Variation in Institutional Strength.” Annual Review of Political Science 12(1): 115–133.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Zavaleta, Mauricio. 2016. “Why No Party-Building in Peru?” In Challenges of Party-Building in Latin America, eds. Levitsky, Steven, Loxton, James, van Dyck, Brandon, and Dominguez, Jorge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Luna, Juan Pablo, and Altman, David. 2011. “Uprooted but Stable: Chilean Parties and the Concept of Party System Institutionalization.” Latin American Politics and Society 53(2): 1–28.Google Scholar
Lupu, Noam. 2016. Party Brands in Crisis: Partisanship, Brand Dilution and the Breakdown of Political Parties in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Machado, Fabiana, Scartascini, Carlos, and Tommasi, Mariano. 2011. “Political Institutions and Street Protests in Latin America.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 55(3): 340–365.Google Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz. 2003. “Authoritarianism, Democracy and the Supreme Court: Horizontal Exchange and the Rule of Law in Mexico.” In Democratic Accountability in Latin America, eds. Mainwaring, Scott and Welna, Christopher. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz. 2008. “Enforcing the Autocratic Political Order and the Role of Courts: The Case of Mexico.” In Rule by Law, eds. Ginsburg, Tom and Moustafa, Tamir. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Malarino, Ezequiel. 2010. “Activismo judicial, punitivización y nacionalización. Tendencias antidemocráticas y antiliberales en la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos.” In Sistema interamericano de protección de los derechos humanos y derecho penal internacional, ed. Ambos, Kai. Montevideo: Fundación Konrad Adenauer.Google Scholar
Manzetti, Luigi. 2014. “Accountability and Corruption in Argentina during the Kirchners’ Era.” Latin American Research Review 49(2): 173–195.Google Scholar
Manzi, Lucia. 2018. “The Effective Judicial Prosecution of Systemic Political Corruption: Italy.” Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Notre Dame.Google Scholar
March, James G. 1991. “Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning.” Organization Science 2(1): 71–87.Google Scholar
Marcus, George, Neuman, Russell, and MacKuen, Michael. 2000. Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Martini, Maíra. 2015. Fighting Grand Corruption. New York: Transparency International.Google Scholar
Mayka, Lindsay. 2019. Building Participatory Institutions in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCann, James A., and Domínguez, Jorge. 1998. “Mexicans React to Electoral Fraud and Political Corruption: An Assessment of Public Opinion and Voting Behavior.” Electoral Studies 17(4): 483–503.Google Scholar
McCoy, Jennifer L., and Heckel, Heather. 2001. “The Emergence of a Global Anti-corruption Norm.” International Politics 38(1): 65–90.Google Scholar
van der Meer, Tom. 2010. “In What We Trust? A Multi-level Study into Trust in Parliament as an Evaluation of State Characteristics.” International Review of Administrative Sciences 76(3): 517–536.Google Scholar
Meierhenrich, Jens, and Pendas, Devin. 2017. “‘The Justice of My Cause Is Clear, but There’s Politics to Fear’: Political Trials in Theory and History.” In Political Trials in Theory and History, eds. Meierhenrich, Jens and Pendas, Devin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Meléndez, Carlos. 2019. El mal menor: Vínculos politicos en el Perú posterior al colapso del sistema de partidos. Lima: IEP.Google Scholar
Meléndez, Carlos, and León, Carlos. 2009. “Perú 2008: El juego de ajedrez de la gobernabilidad en partidas simultáneas.” Revista de ciencia política 29(2): 591–609.Google Scholar
Metz-McDonnell, Erin. 2017. “Patchwork Leviathan: How Pockets of Bureaucratic Governance Flourish within Institutionally Diverse Developing States.” American Sociological Review 82(3): 476–510.Google Scholar
Meyer, John W., Boli, John, Thomas, George M., and Ramirez, Francisco O.. 1997. “World Society and the Nation‐State.” American Journal of Sociology 103(1): 144–181.Google Scholar
Michel, Verónica. 2018a. Prosecutorial Accountability and Victims’ Rights in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Michel, Verónica. 2018b. “Public Prosecutors’ Offices in Latin America.” In Routledge Handbook of Law and Society in Latin America, eds. Sieder, Rachel, Ansolabehere, Karina, and Alfonso, Tatiana. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Michel, Verónica, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 2013. “Human Rights Prosecutions and the Participation Rights of Victims in Latin America.” Law & Society Review 47(4): 873–907.Google Scholar
Miller, Arthur H. 1974. “Political Issues and Trust in Government: 1964–1970.” American Political Science Review 68(3): 951–972.Google Scholar
Mishler, William, and Rose, Richard. 2001. “What Are the Origins of Political Trust?” Comparative Political Studies 34(1): 30–62.Google Scholar
Mondak, Jeffery J. 1990. “Perceived Legitimacy of Supreme Court Decisions: Three Functions of Source Credibility.” Political Behavior 12(4): 363–384.Google Scholar
Moons, Wesley G., Eisenberger, Naomi I., and Taylor, Shelley E.. 2010. “Anger and Fear Responses to Stress Have Different Biological Profiles.” Brain, Behavior, and Immunity 24(2): 215–219.Google Scholar
Moreira Leite, Paulo. 2015. A outra história da Lava-Jato: Uma investigação necessária que se transformou numa operação contra a democracia. São Paulo: Geração Editorial.Google Scholar
Moro, Sergio. 2004. “Consideraçoes sobre a operaçao Mani Pulite.” Revista CEJ 26: 56–62.Google Scholar
Moro, Sergio. 2018. “Preventing Systemic Corruption in Brazil.” Daedalus 147(3): 157–168.Google Scholar
Morris, Stephen D., and Klesner, Joseph L.. 2010. “Corruption and Trust: Theoretical Considerations and Evidence from Mexico.” Comparative Political Studies 43(10): 1258–1285.Google Scholar
Mota-Prado, Mariana, and Rodriguez-Machado, Marta. Forthcoming. “Using Criminal Law to Fight Corruption: The Potential, Risks and Limitations of Operation Car Wash (Lava Jato).” American Journal of Comparative Law.Google Scholar
Mungiu-Pippidi, Alina. 2015. The Quest for Good Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Muñoz, Paula. 2019. Buying Audiences: Clientelism and Electoral Campaigns When Parties are Weak. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Muñoz, Paula. 2021. “Peru’s Democracy in Search of Representation.” In Divisive Politics and Democratic Dangers in Latin America, eds. Carothers, Thomas and Feldman, Andreas. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.Google Scholar
Muñoz, Paula, and Dargent, Eduardo. 2016. “Patronage, Subnational Linkages, and Party-Building: The Cases of Colombia and Peru.” In Challenges of Party-Building in Latin America, eds. Levitsky, Steven, Loxton, James, van Dyck, Brandon, and Dominguez, Jorge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Murillo, María Victoria, Levistky, Steven, and Brinks, Daniel. 2021. La ley y la trampa en América Latina: por qué optar por el debilitamiento institucional puede ser una estrategia política. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI Editores.Google Scholar
Nabi, Robin L. 1999. “A Cognitive-Functional Model for the Effects of Discrete Negative Emotions on Information Processing, Attitude Change, and Recall.” Communication Theory 9(3): 292–320.Google Scholar
Naim, Moisés. 1995. “The Corruption Eruption.” The Brown Journal of World Affairs 2(2): 245–261.Google Scholar
Nelken, David. 1996. “The Judges and Political Corruption in Italy.” Journal of Law and Society 23(1): 95–112.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Stephen P., and Hansford, Thomas G.. 2014. “Partisans in Robes: Party Cues and Public Acceptance of Supreme Court Decisions.” American Journal of Political Science 58(3): 620–636.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Stephen P., and Howard, Robert M.. 2003. “Framing Support for the Supreme Court in the Aftermath of Bush v. Gore.” Journal of Politics 65(3): 676–695.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, Guillermo. 1993. “On the State, Democratization and Some Conceptual Problems: A Latin American View with Glances at Some Postcommunist Countries.” World Development 21(8): 1355–1369.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, Guillermo. 1998. “Horizontal Accountability in New Democracies.” Journal of Democracy 9(3): 112–126.Google Scholar
Oliveros, Virginia, and Schuster, Christian. 2018. “Merit, Tenure, and Bureaucratic Behavior: Evidence from a Conjoint Experiment in the Dominican Republic.” Comparative Political Studies 51(6): 759–792.Google Scholar
Olvera Rivera, Alberto Javier. 2019. “Regime Crisis, Subnational Authoritarianism and Justice Reform in Mexico.” Perfiles latinoamericanos 27(53): 1–25.Google Scholar
Ortellado, Pablo, and Solano, Esther. 2016. “Nova direita nas ruas? Uma análise do descompasso entre manifestantes e os convocantes dos protestos antigoverno de 2015.” Perseu: História, memória e política 11: 169–180.Google Scholar
Ortiz Ortiz, Richard. 2018. “Los problemas estructurales de la Constitución ecuatoriana de 2008 y el hiperpresidencialismo autoritario.” Estudios constitucionales 16(2): 527–566.Google Scholar
Ottati, Victor, Terkildsen, Nayda, and Hubbard, Clark. 1997. “Happy Faces Elicit Heuristic Processing in a Televised Impression Formation Task: A Cognitive Tuning Account.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 23(11): 1144–1156.Google Scholar
Paiva, Luan Correa de. 2019. A criminalização político-ideológica da esquerda: Uma explicação crítica para o recente caso brasileiro. São Paulo: Editora Dialectica.Google Scholar
Pari, Juan. 2017. Estado corrupto: Los megaproyectos del caso Lava Jato en Perú. Lima: Planeta.Google Scholar
Patterson, M., and Schaeffer, R. E.. 1977. “Effects of Size and Sex Composition on Interaction Distance, Participation, and Satisfaction in Small Groups.” Small Group Research 8: 433–442.Google Scholar
Pavão, Nara. 2018. “Corruption as the Only Option: The Limits to Electoral Accountability.” The Journal of Politics 80(3): 996–1010.Google Scholar
Pei, Minxin. 2018. “How Not to Fight Corruption: Lessons from China.” Daedalus 147(3): 216–230.Google Scholar
Petersen, Roger D. 2011. Western Intervention in the Balkans: The Strategic Use of Emotion in Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Piper, William E. et al. 1983. “Cohesion as a Basic Bond in Groups.” Human Relations 36(2): 93–108.Google Scholar
Pires, Roberto R. C. 2010. “Beyond the Fear of Discretion: Flexibility, Performance, and Accountability in the Management of Regulatory Bureaucracies.” Regulation and Governance 5(1): 1–27.Google Scholar
Popova, Maria, and Post, Vincent. 2018. “Prosecuting High-Level Corruption in Eastern Europe.” Communist and Post-Communist Studies 51(3): 231–244.Google Scholar
della Porta, Donatella. 2001. “A Judges’ Revolution? Political Corruption and the Judiciary in Italy.” European Journal of Political Research 39(1): 1–21.Google Scholar
della Porta, Donatella, and Vannucci, Alberto. 2007. “Corruption and Anti-corruption: The Political Defeat of ‘Clean Hands’ in Italy.” West European Politics 30(4): 830–853.Google Scholar
Power, Timothy, and Taylor, Matthew eds. 2011. Corruption and Democracy in Brazil: The Struggle for Accountability. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Praça, Sérgio, and Taylor, Matthew M.. 2014. “Inching toward Accountability: The Evolution of Brazil’s Anticorruption Institutions, 1985–2010.” Latin American Politics and Society 56(2): 27–48.Google Scholar
Pulecio-Boek, Daniel. 2015. “The Genealogy of Prosecutorial Discretion in Latin America: A Comparative and Historical Analysis of the Adversarial Reforms in the Region.” Richmond Journal of Global Law and Business 13(1): 67–144.Google Scholar
Rhodes-Purdy, Matthew, and Rosenblatt, Fernando. 2021. “Raising the Red Flag: Democratic Elitism and the Protests in Chile.” Perspectives on PoliticsGoogle Scholar
Rich, Jessica A. J. 2019. State-Sponsored Activism: Bureaucrats and Social Movements in Democratic Brazil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ríos-Figueroa, Julio. 2007. “Fragmentation of Power and the Emergence of an Effective Judiciary in Mexico, 1994–2002.” Latin American Politics and Society 49(1): 31–57.Google Scholar
Ríos-Figueroa, Julio. 2015. “Judicial Institutions.” In Routledge Handbook of Comparative Political Institutions, eds. Ganhi, Jennifer and Ruiz-Rufino, Ruben. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ríos-Figueroa, Julio. 2019. “Independence in Judicial Hierarchies: Civil-Law Systems.” In Research Handbook on Law and Courts, eds. Sterett, Susan and Walker, Demetrius. London: Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Roca, David. 2019. Lava Jato en el Congreso: detrás de cámaras de un debate. Lima: Revuelta Editores.Google Scholar
Roht-Arriaza, Naomi. 2009. “Prosecutions of Heads of State in Latin America.” In Prosecuting Heads of State, eds. Lutz, Ellen L. and Reiger, Caitlin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roht-Arriaza, Naomi. 2015. “After Amnesties Are Gone: Latin American National Courts and the New Contours of the Fight Against Impunity.” Human Rights Quarterly 37(2): 341.Google Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1999. Corruption and Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, Susan, and Palifka, Bonnie J.. 2016. Corruption and Government. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rotberg, Robert. 2017. The Corruption Cure: How Citizens and Leaders Can Combat Graft. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rothstein, Bo. 2011. “Anti-corruption: The Indirect ‘Big Bang’ Approach.” Review of International Political Economy 18(2): 228–250.Google Scholar
Rothstein, Bo, and Varraich, Aiysha. 2017. Making Sense of Corruption. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Stéphanie, and Dargent, Eduardo. 2019. “The Construction of Indigenous Language Rights in Peru: A Language Regime Approach.” Journal of Politics in Latin America 11(2): 161–180.Google Scholar
de Sa e Silva, Fabio. 2020. “From Car Wash to Bolsonaro: Law and Lawyers in Brazil’s Illiberal Turn (2014–2018).” Journal of Law and Society 47: 90–110.Google Scholar
Sadek, Maria Tereza, and Cavalcanti, Rosângela Batista. 2003. “The New Brazilian Public Prosecution: An Agent of Accountability.” In Democratic Accountability in Latin America, eds. Mainwaring, Scott and Welna, Christopher. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sakwa, Richard. 2017. “The Trials of Khodorkovsky in Russia.” In Political Trials in Theory and History, eds. Meierhenrich, Jens and Pendas, Devin O.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Samuels, David J., and Zucco, Cesar. 2018. Partisans, Antipartisans, and Nonpartisans. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sanchez-Badin, Michelle R., and Sanchez-Badin, Arthur. 2019. “Anticorruption in Brazil: From Transnational Legal Order to Disorder.” AJIL Unbound 113: 326–330.Google Scholar
Sberna, Salvatore, and Vannucci, Alberto. 2013. “‘It’s the Politics, Stupid!’: The Politicization of Anti-corruption in Italy.” Crime, Law and Social Change 60(5): 565–593.Google Scholar
Scartascini, Carlos, and Tommasi, Mariano. 2012. “The Making of Policy: Institutionalized or Not?” American Journal of Political Science 56(4): 787–801.Google Scholar
Scheb, John, and Lyons, William. 2000. “The Myth of Legality and Public Evaluation of the Supreme Court.” Social Science Quarterly 81(4): 928–940.Google Scholar
Schedler, Andreas, Diamond, Larry, and Plattner, Marc. 1999. The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies. Bounder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Spaeth, Harold J.. 1993. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Seligson, Mitchell A. 2002. “The Impact of Corruption on Regime Legitimacy: A Comparative Study of Four Latin American Countries.” The Journal of Politics 64(2): 408–433.Google Scholar
Sergi, Anna. 2016. “Three Tales / Two Threats”. Prosecutors in Italy, England and the United States Narrate National and Transnational Organised Crime. Mimeo.Google Scholar
Sewell, William H. 1996. “Historical Events as Transformations of Structures: Inventing Revolution at the Bastille.” Theory and Society 25(6): 841–881.Google Scholar
Shipan, Charles R., and Volden, Craig. 2008. “The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion.” American Journal of Political Science 52(4): 840–857.Google Scholar
Shipan, Charles R., and Volden, Craig. 2012. “Policy Diffusion: Seven Lessons for Scholars and Practitioners.” Public Administration Review 72(6): 788–796.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. 1993. “Human Rights, Principled Issue-Networks, and Sovereignty in Latin America.” International Organization 47(3): 411–441.Google Scholar
Sikkink, Kathryn. 2011. The Justice Cascade: How Human Rights Prosecutions Are Changing World Politics. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Singer, Peter. 2011. The Expanding Circle: Ethics, Evolution and Moral Progress. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Silva, Cátia Aida. 2000. “Brazilian Prosecutors and the Collective Demands: Bringing Social Issues to the Courts of Justice.” Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Latin American Studies Association, Miami.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A. 2001. “The International Politics of Harmonization: The Case of Capital Market Regulation.” International Organization 55(3): 589–620.Google Scholar
Simpser, Alberto. 2013. Why Governments and Parties Manipulate Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Steven M. 2003. “The Constraining Effects of Initial Ideas.” In Group Creativity: Innovation through Collaboration, eds. Paulus Paul, B. and Nijstad, Bernard A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smulovitz, Catalina. forthcoming. “Del ‘descubrimiento de la ley’ al ‘lawfare’ o cómo las uvas se volvieron amargas.” Revista SAAP.Google Scholar
Soifer, Hillel. 2020. “Shadow Cases in Comparative Research.” Qualitative & Multi-Method Research 18(2): 9–18.Google Scholar
Solaz, Hector, de Vries, Catherine E., and de Geus, Roosmarijn A.. 2019. “In-Group Loyalty and the Punishment of Corruption.” Comparative Political Studies 52(6): 896–926.Google Scholar
de Sousa Santos, Boaventura. 1995. Toward a New Common Sense: Law, Science and Politics in the Paradigmatic Transition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Spiller, Pablo T., and Tommasi, Mariano. 2007. The Institutional Foundations of Public Policy in Argentina. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spink, Kevin S., and Carron, Albert. 1992. “Group Cohesion and Adherence in Exercise Classes.” Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 14(1): 78–86.Google Scholar
Stockemer, Daniel, and Scruggs, Lyle. 2012. “Income Inequality, Development and Electoral Turnout – New Evidence on a Burgeoning Debate.” Electoral Studies 31(4): 764–773.Google Scholar
Stoyan, Alissandra T. 2020. “Ambitious Reform via Constituent Assemblies: Determinants of Success in Contemporary Latin America.” Studies in Comparative International Development 55(1): 99–121.Google Scholar
Sugiyama, Natasha Borges. 2012. “Bottom-up Policy Diffusion: National Emulation of a Conditional Cash Transfer Program in Brazil.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 42(1): 25–51.Google Scholar
Sullivan, John L., Piereson, James, and Marcus, George E.. 1979. “An Alternative Conceptualization of Political Tolerance: Illusory Increases 1950s–1970s.” American Political Science Review 73(3): 781–794.Google Scholar
Taber, Charles S., and Lodge, Milton. 2006. “Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs.” American Journal of Political Science 50(3): 755–769.Google Scholar
Taylor, Matthew M. 2018. “Getting to Accountability: A Framework for Planning & Implementing Anticorruption Strategies.” Daedalus 147(3): 63–82.Google Scholar
Teitel, Ruti G. 2003. “Transitional Justice Genealogy.” Harvard Human Rights Journal 16: 15–94.Google Scholar
Teles, Steven. 2012. The Rise of the Conservative Legal Movement. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tonry, Michael. 2012. “Prosecutors and Politics in Comparative Perspective.” Crime and Justice: Review of Research 41: 1–34.Google Scholar
Travaglio, Marco, Gomez, Peter, and Barbacetto, Gianni. 2012. Mani Pulite: La Vera Storia. Roma: Chiarelettere.Google Scholar
Truth and Reconciliation Commission. 2003. Informe Final: Tomo III. Lima: Comisión de la Verdad y Reconciliación.Google Scholar
Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel. 1981. “The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice.” Science 211(4481): 453–458.Google Scholar
Tyler, Tom R. 2004. “Enhancing Police Legitimacy.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 593(1): 84–99.Google Scholar
United States Department of Justice. 2016. Case Information File: United States V. Odebrecht.Google Scholar
Uslaner, Eric M. 2008. Corruption, Inequality, and the Rule of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Valentino, Nicholas A. et al. 2011. “Election Night’s Alright for Fighting: The Role of Emotions in Political Participation.” The Journal of Politics 73(1): 156–170.Google Scholar
Valentino, Nicholas A., Gregorowicz, Krysha, and Groenendyk, Eric W.. 2009. “Efficacy, Emotions and the Habit of Participation.” Political Behavior 31(3): 307–330.Google Scholar
Vannucci, Alberto. 2009. “The Controversial Legacy of ‘Mani Pulite’: A Critical Analysis of Italian Corruption and Anti-corruption Policies.” Bulletin of Italian Politics 1(2): 233–264.Google Scholar
Vannucci, Alberto. 2016. “The ‘Clean Hands’ (Mani Pulite) Inquiry on Corruption and Its Effects on the Italian Political System.” Em Debate 8(2): 62–68.Google Scholar
Vera, Sofia B. 2020. “Accepting or Resisting? Citizen Responses to Corruption across Varying Levels of Competence and Corruption Prevalence.” Political Studies 68(3): 653–670.Google Scholar
Vergara, Alberto. 2018. “Virtue, Fortune, and Failure in Peru.” Journal of Democracy 29(4): 65–76.Google Scholar
Vergara, Camila. 2020. Systemic Corruption: Constitutional Ideas for an Anti-Oligarchic Republic. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
de Vries, Catherine E., and Solaz, Hector. 2017. “The Electoral Consequences of Corruption.” Annual Review of Political Science 20: 391–408.Google Scholar
Wallander, Lisa. 2009. “Twenty-five Years of Factorial Surveys in Sociology: A Review.” Social Science Research 38(3): 505–520.Google Scholar
Wang, Ching-Hsing. 2016. “Government Performance, Corruption, and Political Trust in East Asia*.” Social Science Quarterly 97(2): 211–231.Google Scholar
Warren, Mark. 2004. “What Does Corruption Mean in a Democracy?” American Journal of Political Science 48(2): 328–343.Google Scholar
Webster, Steven W. 2017. “Anger and Declining Trust in Government in the American Electorate.” Political Behavior 40(4): 933–964.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 2005. “Theories of Policy Diffusion Lessons from Latin American Pension Reform.” World Politics 57(2): 262–295.Google Scholar
Weyland, Kurt. 2009. “Institutional Change in Latin America: External Models and Their Unintended Consequences.” Journal of Politics in Latin America 1(1): 37–66.Google Scholar
Whitehead, Laurence. 2021. “Democratic Delinquencies in Latin America.” Journal of Democracy 32(3): 78–93Google Scholar
Whiteley, Paul, Clarke, Harold D., Sanders, David, and Stewart, Marianne. 2016. “Why Do Voters Lose Trust in Governments? Public Perceptions of Government Honesty and Trustworthiness in Britain 2000–2013.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 18(1): 234–254.Google Scholar
Widmeyer, W. N., Brawley, L. R., and Carron, Albert V.. 1990. “The Effects of Group Size in Sport.” Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 12: 177–190.Google Scholar
Wittenbaum, Gwen M., and Moreland, Richard L.. 2008. “Small-Group Research in Social Psychology: Topics and Trends over Time.” Social and Personality Psychology Compass 2(1): 187–203.Google Scholar
World Bank. 1997. Helping Countries Combat Corruption: The Role of the World Bank. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Woods, Patricia J., and Hilbink, Lisa. 2009. “Comparative Sources of Judicial Empowerment.” Political Research Quarterly 62(4): 745–752.Google Scholar
Zechmeister, Elizabeth J., and Zizumbo-Colunga, Daniel. 2013. “The Varying Political Toll of Concerns about Corruption in Good versus Bad Economic Times.” Comparative Political Studies 46(10): 1190–1218.Google Scholar
Zink, James R., Spriggs, James F., and Scott, John T.. 2009. “Courting the Public: The Influence of Decision Attributes on Individuals’ Views of Court Opinions.” The Journal of Politics 71(3): 909–925.Google Scholar