Book contents
- Propertius and the Virgilian Sensibility
- Propertius and the Virgilian Sensibility
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- About the Texts and Translations Used in This Book
- Chapter 1 Introduction: Virgil and the Propertian Sensibility
- Chapter 2 Rus in Urbe
- Chapter 3 Shades of Dido
- Chapter 4 The Shield of Propertius
- Chapter 5 Romani patria Callimachi
- Chapter 6 Propertius’ Epic Designs
- Chapter 7 Conclusions
- Bibliography
- Index Locorum
- General Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 November 2024
Book contents
- Propertius and the Virgilian Sensibility
- Propertius and the Virgilian Sensibility
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- About the Texts and Translations Used in This Book
- Chapter 1 Introduction: Virgil and the Propertian Sensibility
- Chapter 2 Rus in Urbe
- Chapter 3 Shades of Dido
- Chapter 4 The Shield of Propertius
- Chapter 5 Romani patria Callimachi
- Chapter 6 Propertius’ Epic Designs
- Chapter 7 Conclusions
- Bibliography
- Index Locorum
- General Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Propertius and the Virgilian SensibilityElegy after 19 BC, pp. 393 - 446Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2024
References
Acosta-Hughes, B. (2002) Polyeideia: The Iambi of Callimachus and the Archaic Iambic Tradition. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Acosta-Hughes, B. (2008) ‘Unwilling farewell and complex allusion (Sappho, Callimachus and Aeneid 6.458)’, in Cairns, F., Cairns, S. & Williams, F. (eds.), Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar 13: Hellenistic Greek and Augustan Latin Poetry, Flavian and Post-Flavian Latin Poetry, Greek and Roman Prose. Cambridge: 1–11.Google Scholar
Acosta-Hughes, B. (2010) Arion’s Lyre: Archaic Lyric into Hellenistic Poetry. Princeton, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acosta-Hughes, B., Lehnus, L. & Stephens, S. (eds.) (2011) Brill’s Companion to Callimachus. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acosta-Hughes, B. & Stephens, S. A. (eds.) (2012) Callimachus in Context: From Plato to the Augustan Poets. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, J. N. & Mayer, R. G. (eds.) (2011) Aspects of the Language of Latin Poetry. Oxford: 21–93.Google Scholar
Albrecht, M. von (1997) A History of Roman Literature: From Livius Andronicus to Boethius: With Special Regard to its Influence on World Literature. 2 vols. Leiden.Google Scholar
Albrecht, M. von (2012) ‘Properz und die Architektur des augusteischen Rom’, in Cristofoli, Santini & Santucci 2012: 207–28.Google Scholar
Alessi, P. T. (1989) ‘Propertius: Furor, ingenium and Callimachus’, in Deroux, C. (ed.), Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History 5. Brussels: 216–32.Google Scholar
Alfonsi, L. (1944–5a) ‘Di Properzio II, 34 e della protasi dell’ Eneide’, RFIC 22–3: 116–29.Google Scholar
Alfonsi, L. (1954) ‘Il giudizio di Properzio sulla poesia vergiliana’, Aevum 28.3: 205–21.Google Scholar
Allen, A. W. (1962) ‘Sunt qui Propertium malint’, in Sullivan, J.P. (ed.), Critical Essays on Roman Literature I: Elegy and Lyric. London: 109–48.Google Scholar
Álvarez Hernández, A. R. (1997) La poética de Propercio (Autobiografía artística del ‘Calímaco romano’). Assisi.Google Scholar
Álvarez Hernández, A. R. (2005) ‘Properzio e gli archetipi ellenistici del genere elegiaco’, in Santini & Santucci 2005: 33–59.Google Scholar
Álvarez Hernández, A. R. (2014) ‘Il Virgilio dei primi libri properziani’, in Bonamente, Cristofoli & Santini 2014: 255–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambühl, A. (2004) ‘Entertaining Theseus and Heracles: The Hecale and the Victoria Berenices as a diptych’, in Harder, Regtuit & Wakker 2004: 23–47.Google Scholar
Ambühl, A. (2005) Kinder und junge Helden: innovative Aspekte des Umgangs mit der literarischen Tradition bei Kallimachos (Hellenistica Groningana 9). Leuven.Google Scholar
Anagnostou-Laoutides, E. (2023) ‘Lust in lions and lovers: Hunting for civic virtue in Vergil, Propertius, and early Greek elegy’, in Keith & Myers 2023: 106–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ancona, R. & Greene, E. (eds.) (2005) Gendered Dynamics in Latin Love Poetry. Baltimore, MD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, A. R. (1928) ‘Heracles and his successors: A study of a heroic ideal and the recurrence of a heroic type’, HSPh 39: 7–58.Google Scholar
Anderson, R. D., Parsons, P. J. & Nisbet, R. G. M. (1979) ‘Elegiacs by Gallus from Qaṣr Ibrîm’, JRS 69: 125–55.Google Scholar
Anderson, W. S. (1968) ‘Pastor Aeneas: On pastoral themes in the Aeneid’, TAPhA 99: 1–17.Google Scholar
Anderson, W. S. (1992) ‘The limits of genre (Response to Francis Cairns)’, in Galinsky 1992: 96–103.Google Scholar
Arkins, B. T. (1989) ‘Language in Propertius 4.6’, Philologus 133.1–2: 246–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, D., Fish, J., Johnston, P. A. & Skinner, M. B. (eds.) (2004) Vergil, Philodemus and the Augustans. Austin, TX.Google Scholar
Ash, R. (2002) ‘Epic encounters? Ancient historical battle narratives and the epic tradition’, in Levene & Nelis 2002: 253–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asper, M. (1997) Onomata allotria: Zur Genese, Struktur und Funktion poetologischer Metaphern bei Kallimachos (Hermes Einzelschrift 75). Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Asper, M. (2008) ‘Apollonius and Poetry’, in Papanghelis & Rengakos 2008: 167–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asper, M. (2011) ‘Dimensions of power: Callimachean geopoetics and the Ptolemaic Empire’, in Acosta-Hughes, Lehnus & Stephens 2011: 155–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Avezzù, E. (2008) ‘Motivi dell’epica greca arcaica nell’elegia properziana’, in Santini & Santucci 2008: 273–92.Google Scholar
Baeza Angulo, E. F. & Buono, V. (2013) ‘La solitudine domestica delle matrone elegiache’, Ágora 15: 33–49.Google Scholar
Barbantani, S. (2001) Φάτις νικηφόρος: frammenti di elegia encomiastica nell’età delle Guerre Galatiche: Supplementum Hellenisticum 958 e 969. Milan.Google Scholar
Barbantani, S. (2011) ‘Callimachus’ queens’, in Acosta-Hughes, Lehnus & Stephens 2011: 201–24.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (1978) ‘Il lamento di Giuturna’, MD 1: 99–121. Eng. trans. in Barchiesi 2015: 95–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (1979) ‘Palinuro e Caieta: due “epigrammi” Virgiliani (Aen. V 870 sg.; VII 1–4)’, Maia 31: 3–11.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (1984) La traccia del modello: effetti omerici nella narrazione virgiliana. Pisa. Eng. trans. in Barchiesi 2015: xv–93.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (1994a) ‘Rappresentazioni del dolore e interpretazione nell’Eneide’, A&A 40.1: 109–24.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (1994b) ‘Immovable Delos: Aeneid 3.73–98 and the Hymns of Callimachus’, CQ 44.2: 438–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (1995) ‘Figure dell’intertestualità nell’epica romana’, Lexis 13: 49–67. Eng. trans. in Barchiesi 2001a: 129–40.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (1997a) The Poet and the Prince: Ovid and Augustan Discourse. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (1997b) ‘Otto punti su una mappa dei naufragi’, MD 39: 209–26. Eng. trans. in Barchiesi 2001a: 141–54.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (1997c) ‘Virgilian narrative: Ecphrasis’, in Martindale 1997a: 271–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (2001a) Speaking Volumes: Narrative and Intertext in Ovid and other Latin poets. London.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (2001b) ‘The crossing’, in Harrison, S. J. (ed.), Texts, Ideas, and the Classics: Scholarship, Theory and Classical Literature. Oxford: 142–63.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (2005a) ‘Learned eyes: Poets, viewers, image makers’, in Galinsky, G. K. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Augustus. Cambridge: 281–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (2005b) ‘The search for the perfect book: A PS to the new Posidippus’, in Gutzwiller 2005: 320–42.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (2011) ‘Roman Callimachus’, in Acosta-Hughes, Lehnus & Stephens 2011: 511–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (2015) Homeric Effects in Vergil’s Narrative, trans. I. Marchesi & M. Fox. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (2019) ‘Virgilian narrative: Ecphrasis’, in Mac Góráin & Martindale 2019: 413–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron, S. (2011) Strandentwining Cable: Joyce, Flaubert, and Intertextuality. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, M. (1981) Review of Sollertinsky & Sollertinsky (1981). Music & Letters 62.3/4: 430–2.Google Scholar
Barsby, J. A. (1974) ‘The composition and publication of the first three books of Propertius’, G&R 21.2: 128–37.Google Scholar
Barton, T. (1995) ‘Augustus and Capricorn: Astrological polyvalency and imperial rhetoric’, JRS 85: 33–51.Google Scholar
Bartsch, S. (1998) ‘Ars and the Man: The politics of art in Virgil’s Aeneid’, CPh 93.4: 322–42.Google Scholar
Bartsch, S. & Elsner, J. (2007) ‘Introduction: Eight ways of looking at an ekphrasis’, CPh 102.1: i–vi.Google Scholar
Basson, A. F. & Dominik, W. J. (eds.) (2003) Literature, Art, History: Studies on Classical Antiquity and Tradition in Honour of W. J. Henderson. Bern.Google Scholar
Beck, B. (2013) ‘Tying up loose ends: The metapoetics of closure in Odyssey 22’, Rosetta 13: 1–15.Google Scholar
Bergmann, B. & Kondoleon, C. (eds.) (1999) The Art of Ancient Spectacle. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Berry, M. (2006) ‘Hercules and Augustus: Propertius 4.9: A political reading’. MA Diss. Tasmania.Google Scholar
Berry, M. (2011) ‘Political poetics: the Bona Dea episode in Propertius 4, 9’, Latomus 70.2: 391-404.Google Scholar
Bettenworth, A. (2016) ‘Hoc satis in titulo … ’: Studien zu den Inschriften in der römischen Elegie. Münster.Google Scholar
Bettini, M. (2004) ‘Tarpeiae turpe sepulchrum/fabor. Il ‘mito romano’ fra discorso autorevole e discorso screditato’, in Santini & Santucci 2004: 199–230.Google Scholar
Bettini, M. (2012) ‘Properzio, Vertumno e i mores pubblici’, in Cristofoli, Santini & Santucci 2012: 99–109.Google Scholar
Bigaroni, M. & Santucci, F. (eds.) (1977) Colloquium Propertianum: Atti (Assisi, 26–28 marzo 1976). Assisi.Google Scholar
Binder, G. (1971) Aeneas und Augustus: Interpretationen zum 8. Buch der Aeneis (Beiträge zur klassischen Philologie 38). Meisenheim am Glan.Google Scholar
Binder, G. & Hamm, U. (1998) ‘Die ‘Locke der Berenike’ und der Ursprung der römischen Liebeselegie’, in Radke, A. E. (ed.), Candide Iudex: Beiträge zur augusteischen Dichtung. Stuttgart: 15–34.Google Scholar
Bing, P. (1988a) The Well-Read Muse: Past and Present in Callimachus and the Hellenistic Poets. Göttingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bing, P. (1988b) ‘Theocritus’ epigrams on the statues of ancient poets’, A&A 34.1: 117–23.Google Scholar
Bing, P. (1997) ‘Reconstructing Berenike’s Lock’, in Most, G. W. (ed.), Collecting Fragments/Fragmente sammeln. Gottingen: 78–94. Repr. in Bing 2009: 65–82.Google Scholar
Bing, P. (2009) The Scroll and the Marble: Studies in Reading and Reception in Hellenistic Poetry. Ann Arbor, MI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birt, T. (1882) Das antike Buchwesen in seinem Verhältniss zur Litteratur, mit Beiträgen zur Textgeschichte des Theokrit, Catull, Properz, und anderer Autoren. Berlin.Google Scholar
Bleisch, P. R. (1999) ‘The empty tomb at Rhoetum: Deiphobus and the problem of the past in Aeneid 6.494–547’, ClAnt 18.2: 187–226.Google Scholar
Blum, R. (1991) Kallimachos: The Alexandrian Library and the Origins of Bibliography. Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Bolchazy, L. J. (1977) Hospitality in Early Rome: Livy’s Concept of its Humanizing Force. Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Boldrer, F. (ed.) (1999) L’Elegia di Vertumno (Properzio 4.2). Introduzione, testo critico, traduzione e commento. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Boldrer, F. (2001) ‘Il mito di Vertumno tra Properzio e Ovidio’, Appunti Romani di Filologia 3: 87–111.Google Scholar
Boldrer, F. (2003) ‘Il callimachismo di Properzio nelle elegie romane: analisi di 4, 1’, in Belloni, L., De Finis, L. & Moretti, G. (eds.), L’officina ellenistica: poesia dotta e popolare in Grecia e a Roma. Trento: 399–423.Google Scholar
Boldrer, F. (2019) ‘Ovidio e Properzio (4.1 e 4.2) nel proemio delle Metamorfosi e un problema testuale in Met. 1.2 (illas/illa)’, Lexis 37: 256–79.Google Scholar
Boldrighini, F. (2014) ‘La gens Propertia e l’edilizia di età augustea ad Assisi: Il caso della Domus Musae’, in Bonamente, Cristofoli & Santini 2014: 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boldrighini, F. (2016) ‘Dei ed eroi della Domus Musae: Quadretti a soggetto mitologico e testi graffiti nel criptoportico della “Casa di Properzio” ad Assisi’, in Bonamente, Cristofoli & Santini 2016: 241–87.Google Scholar
Bonamente, G., Cristofoli, R. & Santini, C. (eds.) (2014) Properzio e l’età augustea: Cultura, storia, arte (Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Propertius: Assisi – Perugia, 25–27 May 2012). Turnhout.Google Scholar
Bonamente, G., Cristofoli, R. & Santini, C. (eds.) (2016) Le figure del mito in Properzio (Proceedings of the Twentieth International Conference on Propertius: Assisi – Bevagna, 30 May–1 June 2014). Turnhout.Google Scholar
Bonamente, G., Cristofoli, R. & Santini, C. (eds.) (2020) I generi letterari in Properzio: modelli e fortuna (Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Conference on Propertius, Assisi – Spello, 24–27 May 2018). Turnhout.Google Scholar
Booth, J. (2006) ‘Naming names – or not: Some significant choices and suppressions in Latin poetry’, in Booth, J. & Maltby, R. (eds.), What’s in a Name? The Significance of Proper Names in Classical Latin Literature. Swansea: 49–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boucher, J. P. (1958) ‘L’œuvre de L. Varius Rufus d’après Properce II, 34’, RÉA 60.3–4: 307–22.Google Scholar
Boucher, J. P. (1980) ‘Virgile et Properce’, in Le Bonniec, H. & Vallet, G. (eds.), Mélanges de Littérature et d’épigraphie latines, d’histoire ancienne et d’archéologie: Hommage à la memoire de Pierre Wuilleumier. Paris: 39–44.Google Scholar
Bowditch, L. (2009) ‘Palatine Apollo and the imperial gaze: Propertius 2.31 and 2.32’, AJPh 130.3: 401–38.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. (1986) ‘Early Greek elegy, symposium, and public festival’, JRS 106: 13–35.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. (2010) ‘Historical narrative in archaic and early classical Greek elegy’, in Konstan, D. & Raaflaub, K. A. (eds.), Epic and History. Malden, MA: 145–66.Google Scholar
Boyd, B. W. (1992) ‘Virgil’s Camilla and the traditions of catalogue and ecphrasis (Aeneid 7.803–17)’, AJPh 113.2: 213–34.Google Scholar
Boyle, A. J. (1986) The Chaonian Dove: Studies in the Eclogues, Georgics and Aeneid of Virgil. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breed, B. W. (2006) Pastoral Inscriptions: Reading and Writing Virgil’s Eclogues. London.Google Scholar
Brenk, F. E. (1979) ‘Tarpeia among the Celts: Watery romance from Simylos to Propertius’, in Deroux, C. (ed.), Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History 1. Brussels: 166–74.Google Scholar
Briggs, W. W., Jr. (1980) Narrative and Simile from the Georgics in the Aeneid. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brink, C. O. (1963) Horace on Poetry: Prolegomena to the Literary Epistles. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Brink, C. O. (ed.) (1982) Horace on Poetry: Epistles Book II: The Letters to Augustus and Florus. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bruno, M. (2007) ‘Cosa sognano i poeti: la rappresentazione onirico-visionaria del programma poetico’, Ὅρμος 9: 17–62.Google Scholar
Buchheit, V. (1963) Vergil über die Sendung Roms: Untersuchungen zum Bellum Poenicum und zur Aeneis. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Butrica, J. L. P. (1996) ‘The Amores of Propertius: Unity and structure in Books 2–4’, ICS 21: 87–158.Google Scholar
Butrica, J. L. P. (1997) ‘Editing Propertius’, CQ 47.1: 176–208. Repr. in Greene & Welch 2012: 42–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butrica, J. L. P. (2001) ‘Apollo Actius, Apollo Leucadius: A false problem in Latin poetry’, in Joyal, M. (ed.), In Altum: Seventy-Five Years of Classical Studies in Newfoundland. St. John’s: 289–311.Google Scholar
Cadili, L., Fowler, R. L. & Herren, M. W. (2014) ‘Mythography’, in Thomas & Ziolkowski 2014: 872–5.Google Scholar
Cafagna, A. (2016) ‘I travestimenti del mito’, in Bonamente, Cristofoli & Santini 2016: 35–50.Google Scholar
Cairns, F. (1969) ‘Propertius I,18 and Callimachus, Acontius and Cydippe’, CR 19.2: 131–4.Google Scholar
Cairns, F. (1984) ‘Propertius and the Battle of Actium (4.6)’, in Woodman & West 1984: 129–68. Repr. in Cairns 2007: 220–61.Google Scholar
Cairns, F. (1992) ‘Propertius 4.9: “Hercules exclusus” and the dimensions of genre’, in Galinsky 1992: 65–95. Repr. in Cairns 2007: 262–85.Google Scholar
Cairns, F. (1996) ‘Ancient “etymology” and Tibullus: On the classification of “etymologies” and on “etymological markers”’, PCPhS 42: 24–59.Google Scholar
Cairns, F. (1998) ‘Ovid Amores 1.15 and the problematic fruges of line 25’, in Schubert, W. (ed.), Ovid: Werk und Wirkung (Festgabe für Michael von Albrecht zum 65. Geburtstag). Frankfurt: 85–93. Repr. in Cairns 2007: 414–22.Google Scholar
Cairns, F. (2002) ‘Propertius the historian (3.3.1–12)?’, in Levene & Nelis 2002: 25–44. Repr. in Cairns 2007: 197–211.Google Scholar
Cairns, F. (2003) ‘Propertius 3.4 and the Aeneid incipit’, CQ 53.1: 309–11. Repr. in Cairns 2007: 212–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cairns, F. (2004) ‘Varius and Vergil: Two pupils of Philodemus in Propertius 2.34?’, in Armstrong, Fish, Johnston & Skinner 2004: 299–321.Google Scholar
Cairns, F. (2011) ‘Tarpeia pudicitia in Propertius 1.16.2 – and the early Roman historians’, RhM 154.2: 176–84.Google Scholar
Campagna, G. (1923-4) ‘Sulla composizione di un’ elegia properziana’, AIV 83.2: 259–67.Google Scholar
Camps, W. A. (1954) ‘A note on the structure of the Aeneid’, CQ 4.3–4: 214–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canas, M. (2009) ‘Scribonia Caesaris et le Stemma des Scribonii Libones’, RPh 83.2: 183–210.Google Scholar
Casali, S. (2006) ‘The making of the shield: Inspiration and repression in the Aeneid’, G&R 53.2: 185–204.Google Scholar
Casali, S. (2007) ‘Correcting Aeneas’s voyage: Ovid’s commentary on Aeneid 3’, TAPhA 137.1: 181–210.Google Scholar
Casali, S. (2009) ‘Ovidian intertextuality’, in Knox, P. E. (ed.), A Companion to Ovid. Chichester: 341–54.Google Scholar
Casali, S. (2010) ‘Autoriflessività onirica nell’Eneide e nei successori epici di Virgilio’, in Scioli, E. & Walde, C. (eds.), Sub imagine somni: Nighttime Phenomena in Greco-Roman Culture. Pisa: 119–42.Google Scholar
Casey, D. (2001) ‘Sunt aliquid Manes: Homer, Plato, and Alexandrian allusion in Propertius IV 7’, CJ 96.4: 401–13.Google Scholar
Caston, R. R. (2003) ‘Rivaling the shield: Propertius 4, 6’, in Thibodeau, P. & Haskell, H. (eds.), Being There Together: Essays in Honor of Michael C. J. Putnam on the Occasion of his Seventieth Birthday. Afton, MN: 145–62.Google Scholar
Catanzaro, G. & Santucci, F. (eds.) (2002) Properzio alle soglie del 2000: Un bilancio di fine secolo. Assisi.Google Scholar
Celentano, L. (1956) ‘Significato e valore del IV libro di Properzio’, Annali della Facoltà di Lettere e Filosofia dell’Università di Napoli 6: 33–68.Google Scholar
Chomse, S. (2024) ‘The rise and fall of Virgil’s sublime Carthage’, in Gale & Chahoud 2024: 164–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciaffi, V. (1978) ‘La Iª elegia del libro IV di Properzio e l’ordinamento del libro’, in Ciaffi, V. (ed.), Scritti indetti o rari. Torino: 147–60.Google Scholar
Ciccarelli, I. (2015a) ‘Commento all’elegia II’, in Fedeli, Dimundo & Ciccarelli 2015: 396–502.Google Scholar
Ciccarelli, I. (2015b) ‘Commento all’elegia X’, in Fedeli, Dimundo & Ciccarelli 2015: 1198–1264.Google Scholar
Citroni, M. (2003) ‘Politica culturale augustea e nuovo assetto dei generi poetici latini’, in Uglione, R. (ed.), Intellettuali e potere nel mondo antico. Alessandria: 101–22.Google Scholar
Citroni, M. (2006) ‘The concept of the classical and the canons of model authors in Roman literature’, in Porter 2006a: 204–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Citroni, M. (2011) ‘Arte allusiva: Pasquali and onward’, in Acosta-Hughes, Lehnus & Stephens 2011: 566–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Citroni, M. (2015) ‘La vittoria e il tempio: interpretazione del proemio del III libro delle Georgiche’, in Günther & Fedeli 2015: 39–87.Google Scholar
Clark, M. L. (1964) ‘Virgil and the golden section’ (review of Duckworth 1962), CR 14.1: 43–5.Google Scholar
Clarke, J. (2003) Imagery of Colour and Shining in Catullus, Propertius, and Horace. New York.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. J., Currie, B. G. F. & Lyne, R. O. A. M. (eds.) (2006) Epic Interactions: Perspectives on Homer, Virgil, and the Epic Tradition. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clausen, W. V. (1987) Virgil’s Aeneid and the Tradition of Hellenistic Poetry. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Clauss, J. J. (1993) The Best of the Argonauts: The Redefinition of the Epic Hero in Book One of Apollonius’ Argonautica. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clauss, J. J. (2010) ‘From the head of Zeus: The beginnings of Roman literature’, in Clauss, J. J. & Cuypers, M. (eds.), A Companion to Hellenistic Literature. Chichester: 463–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clauss, J. J. (2016) ‘The Hercules and Cacus episode in Augustan literature: Engaging the Homeric Hymn to Hermes in light of Callimachus’ and Apollonius’ reception’, in Faulkner, A., Vergados, A. & Schwab, A. (eds.), The Reception of the Homeric Hymns. Oxford: 55–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clément-Tarantino, S. (2006) ‘La poétique romaine comme hybridation féconde: Les leçons de la greffe (Virgile, Géorgiques, 2, 9–82)’, Ars Scribendi 4 (http://ars-scribendi.ens.lsh.fr/).Google Scholar
Coleman, K. M. (2003) ‘Apollo’s speech before the battle of Actium: Propertius 4.6.37–54’, in Basson & Dominik 2003: 37–45.Google Scholar
Coleman, R. (1962) ‘Gallus, the Bucolics, and the ending of the fourth Georgic’, AJPh 83.1: 55–71.Google Scholar
Coleman, R. (1999) ‘Poetic diction and poetic register’, in Adams & Mayer 1999: 21–93.Google Scholar
Conington, J. & Nettleship, H. (1883) P. Vergili Maronis Opera: The Works of Virgil, Vol. 3. 3rd edn. London.Google Scholar
Conington, J. & Nettleship, H. (1884) P. Vergili Maronis Opera: The Works of Virgil, Vol. 2. 4th edn. London.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. (2000) ‘Asymptotes of pleasure: Thoughts on the nature of Roman erotic elegy’, Arethusa 33.1: 71–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1970) ‘Il balteo di Pallante’, RFIC 98: 292–300. Rev. as ‘Il balteo di Pallante. Modelli antropologici e retorica letteraria’ in Conte 1984: 97–107. Rev. & Eng. trans. in Conte 1986a: 185–95.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1974) Memoria dei poeti e sistema letterario. Catullo, Virgilio, Ovidio, Lucano. Turin.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1978) ‘L’episodio di Elena nel secondo dell’Eneide: modelli strutturali e critica dell’autenticità’, RFIC 106: 53–62. Repr. in Conte 1984: 109–19. Eng. trans. in Conte 1986a: 196–207.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1981) ‘Lettura della decima bucolica’, in Gigante, M. (ed.), Lecturae Vergilianae I: Le Bucoliche. Naples: 347–73. Repr. as ‘Il genere e i suoi confini: Interpretazione della decima ecloga’ in Conte 1984: 13–42. Eng. trans. in Conte 1986a: 110–29.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1984) Virgilio: il genere e i suoi confini. Modelli del senso, modelli della forma in una poesia colta e ‘sentimentale’. Milan.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1986a) The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Vergil and Other Latin Poets, trans. C. P. Segal. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1986b) ‘L’amore senza elegia: I Remedia Amoris e la logica di un genere’, in Lazzarani, C. & Conte, G. B. (eds.), Ovidio: Rimedi contro l’amore. Venice: 9–53. Repr. in Conte 1991: 53–94. Eng. trans. in Conte 1994b: 35–65.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1989) Letteratura latina: Manuale storico dalle origini alla fine dell’impero romano. 2nd edn. Florence.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1991) Generi e lettori: Lucrezio, l’elegia d’amore, l’enciclopedia di Plinio. Milan. Eng. trans. as Conte 1994b.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1992a) ‘La retorica dell’imitazione come retorica della cultura: Qualche ripensamento’, FAM 2: 41–52. Engl. trans as Conte 1992b.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1992b) ‘“Rhetoric of imitation” as rhetoric of culture: Some new thoughts’, Vergilius 38: 45–55. Repr. in Conte 1994b: 129–43.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1992c) ‘Proems in the middle’, in Dunn, F. & Cole, T. (eds.), Beginnings in Classical Literature (Yale Classical Studies 29). Cambridge: 147–59.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1994b) Genres and Readers: Lucretius, Love Elegy, Pliny’s Encyclopedia, trans. G. W. Most. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (2007) The Poetry of Pathos: Studies in Virgilian Epic, trans. E. Fantham & G. Most, ed. Harrison, S. J.. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conte, G. B. (2016) Critical Notes on Virgil: Editing the Teubner Text of the Georgics and the Aeneid. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conte, G. B. (2017) Stealing the Club from Hercules: On Imitation in Latin Poetry. Berlin.Google Scholar
Corbeill, A. (2015) Sexing the World: Grammatical Gender and Biological Sex in Ancient Rome. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Corsaro, F. (1992) ‘Sulla ridefinizione Properziana del mito di Tarpeia (Properzio IV, 4)’, SicGymn 45: 43–65.Google Scholar
Cotterill, R. (1988) ‘Sunt aliquid manes: Personalities, personae and ghosts in Augustan poetry’, in Benjamin, A. (ed.), Post-Structuralist Classics. London: 227–44.Google Scholar
Courtney, E. (1968) ‘The structure of Propertius Book 1 and some textual consequences’, Phoenix 22.3: 250–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courtney, E. (1970) ‘The structure of Propertius’ Book III’, Phoenix 24.1: 48–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coutelle, É. (2005) Poétique et Métapoésie chez Properce: De l’Ars amandi à l’Ars scribendi. Louvain.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cristofoli, R. (2005) ‘Properzio e la battaglia di Azio’, in Santini & Santucci 2005: 187–205.Google Scholar
Cristofoli, R. (2008) ‘Antonio e Cleopatra nell’ Eneide e nell’elegia di Properzio’, in Santini & Santucci 2008: 193–212.Google Scholar
Cristofoli, R. (2016) ‘Giove Feretrio in Properzio: storia e mito’, in Bonamente, Cristofoli & Santini 2016: 209–39.Google Scholar
Cristofoli, R., Santini, C. & Santucci, F. (eds.) (2012) Properzio fra tradizione e innovazione (Atti del convegno internazionale, Assisi – Spello, 21–23 maggio 2010). Assisi.Google Scholar
Culpepper Stroup, S. (2010) Catullus, Cicero, and a Society of Patrons: The Generation of the Text. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtis, L. (2019) ‘Elegiac women and the epiphanic gaze: The case of Propertius’ Cynthia’, CPh 114.3: 406–29.Google Scholar
Cusset, C. (1999) La muse dans la bibliothèque: Réécriture et intertextualité dans la poésie alexandrine. Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dällenbach, L. (1989) The Mirror in the Text, trans. J. Whiteley & E. Hughes. Chicago.Google Scholar
Danesi Marioni, G. (1979) ‘Aspetti dell’espressività properziana nel IV libro’, SIFC 51: 103–30.Google Scholar
D’Anna, G. (1983) ‘Il rapporto di Properzio con Virgilio: Una sottile polemica col classicismo augusteo’, in Vivona 1983: 45–57.Google Scholar
D’Anna, G. (1986) ‘Qualche considerazione sui rapporti di Tibullo con Virgilio e Orazio’, Atti del Convegno internazionale di studi su Albio Tibullo (Roma – Palestrina, 10–13 maggio 1984). Rome: 29–45.Google Scholar
DeBrohun, J. B. (2003) Roman Propertius and the Reinvention of Elegy. Ann Arbor, MI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Del Mastro, G. (2014) Titoli e annotazioni bibliologiche nei pairigreci di Ercolano (Cronache Ercolanesi Suppl. 5). Naples.Google Scholar
Den Boeft, J. (2008) ‘Post Stygias aliquid seruabitur undas: The inhabitants of Propertius’ Hades’, in Santini & Santucci 2008: 313–33.Google Scholar
Dench, E. (2005) Romulus’ Asylum: Roman Identities from the Age of Alexander to the Age of Hadrian. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Depew, M. & Obbink, D. (eds.) (2000) Matrices of Genre: Authors, Canons, and Society. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Deschamps, L. (1980) ‘Properce et son double ou l’impossible coïncidence’, Ktèma 5: 89–98.Google Scholar
Deschamps, L. (1981) ‘Aemulatio et latinitas chez Properce’, in Colloquium Propertianum secundum (Assisi, 9–11 November 1979): Atti. Assisi: 101–20.Google Scholar
Desmond, M. (1993) ‘When Dido reads Vergil: Gender and intertextuality in Ovid’s Heroides 7’, Helios 20.1: 56–68.Google Scholar
Dieterich, A. (1900) ‘Die Widmungselegie des letzten Buches des Properz’, RhM 55: 191–221.Google Scholar
Diggle, J., Hall, J. B. & Jocelyn, H. D. (eds.) (1989) Studies in Latin Literature and its Tradition in Honour of C. O. Brink (PCPhS Suppl. 15). Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dimundo, R. (1989) ‘Properzio 4,7: Dalla variante di un modello letterario alla costante di un’ unità tematica’, in Catanzaro & Santucci 1989: 273–81.Google Scholar
Dimundo, R. (ed.) (1990) Properzio 4,7: Dalla variante di un modello letterario alla costante di una unità tematica. Bari.Google Scholar
Dimundo, R. (2000) L’elegia allo specchio: Studi sul I libro degli Amores di Ovidio. Bari.Google Scholar
Dimundo, R. (ed.) (2003) Ovidio: Lezioni d’Amore: saggio di commento al I libro dell’Ars amatoria. Bari.Google Scholar
Dimundo, R. (2011) ‘L’ignobile morte della lena e il riscatto del poeta oppresso (Prop. 4,5,1–4; 67–78)’, Euphrosyne 39: 81–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimundo, R. (2012) ‘Properzio 4,7: Personaggi, intersezioni letterarie, moduli stilistici’, RFIC 140.2: 331–59.Google Scholar
Dimundo, R. (2015a) ‘Commento all’elegia III’, in Fedeli, Dimundo & Ciccarelli 2015: 503–91.Google Scholar
Dimundo, R. (2015b) ‘Commento all’elegia V’, in Fedeli, Dimundo & Ciccarelli 2015: 713–98.Google Scholar
Dimundo, R. (2015c) ‘Commento all’elegia VII’, in Fedeli, Dimundo & Ciccarelli 2015: 901–1004.Google Scholar
Dinter, M. (2005) ‘Epic and epigram: Minor heroes in Virgil’s Aeneid’, CQ 55:1: 153–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dominicy, M. (2007) ‘De la métrique verbale à l’établissement du texte: Sur trois vers de Properce (IV, 3, 51; IV, 7, 85; IV, 10, 31)’, LÉC 75.3: 227–48.Google Scholar
Dominicy, M. (2015) ‘Notes critiques sur les élégies IV, 4 et IV, 5 de Properce’, AC 84: 121–40.Google Scholar
Dominik, W. J. (2003) ‘Following in whose footsteps? The epilogue to Statius’ Thebaid’, in Basson & Dominik 2003: 91–109.Google Scholar
Dornseiff, F. (1936) ‘Die römischen Dichter heillos interpoliert?’, Hermes 71.4: 458–65.Google Scholar
Drew, D. L. (1924) ‘Virgil’s marble temple (Georgics III 10–39)’, CQ 18.3–4: 195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drinkwater, M. O. (2013) ‘The woman’s part: The speaking beloved in Roman elegy’, CQ 63.1: 329–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duckworth, G. E. (1962) Structural Patterns and Proportions in Vergil’s Aeneid: A Study in Mathematical Composition. Ann Arbor, MI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dué, C. (2001) ‘Sunt aliquid manes: Homer, Plato, and Alexandrian allusion in Propertius IV 7’, CJ 96.4: 401–13.Google Scholar
Dufallo, B. (2007) The Ghosts of the Past: Latin Literature, the Dead, and Rome’s Transition to a Principate. Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
Dufallo, B. (2013) The Captor’s Image: Greek Culture in Roman Ecphrasis. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumézil, G. (1974) Mythe et épopée, Vol. 1: L’idéologie des trois fonctions dans les épopées des peuples indo-européens. 2nd edn. Paris.Google Scholar
Du Quesnay, I. M. Le, M. (1995) ‘Horace, Odes 4.5: Pro reditu Imperatoris Caesaris Divi filii Augusti’, in Harrison, S. J. (ed.), Homage to Horace: A Bimillenary Celebration. Oxford: 128–87.Google Scholar
Effe, B. (2002) ‘Hercules fervidus ira: ein Motiv der Aeneis und seine Rezeption bei Properz und Ovid’, Hermes 130.2: 164–75.Google Scholar
Eisenhut, W. (1956) ‘Die Einleitungsverse der Elegie IV 6 des Properz’, Hermes 84.1: 121–8. Repr. in Eisenhut 1975: 302–14.Google Scholar
Eliot, T. S. (1920) ‘Tradition and the individual talent’, in The Sacred Wood: Essays on Poetry and Criticism. London. 42–53.Google Scholar
Eliot, T. S. (1945) What Is a Classic? An Address Delivered before the Virgil Society on the 16th of October, 1944. London.Google Scholar
Enk, P. J. (ed.) (1946) Sex. Propertii Elegiarum liber I (Monobiblos). 2 vols. Leiden.Google Scholar
Erskine, A. (2001) Troy Between Greece and Rome: Local Tradition and Imperial Power. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, J. D. (1992) The Art of Persuasion: Political Propaganda from Aeneas to Brutus. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Evans, J. D. (2009) ‘Prostitutes in the portico of Pompey? A reconsideration’, TAPhA 139.1: 123–45.Google Scholar
Fabre-Serris, J. (2001) ‘Deux réponses de Tibulle à Virgile: Les élégies II, 1 et II, 5’, RÉL 79: 140–51.Google Scholar
Fabre-Serris, J. (2009a) ‘Explorations génériques au livre IV de Properce: Des voix nouvelles dans l’élégie: Quelques réflexions sur les poèmes 7 et 9’, in Van Mal-Maeder, D. K., Burnier, A., Núñez, L. & Bertholet, F. (eds.), Jeux de voix: énonciation, intertextualité et intentionnalité dans la littérature antique. Bern: 157–73.Google Scholar
Fabre-Serris, J. (2009b) ‘Sulpicia: An/other female voice in Ovid’s Heroides: A new reading of Heroides 4 and 15’, Helios 36.2: 149–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabre-Serris, J. (2009c) ‘Le désir au féminin: D’une “Lucrèce” à une autre: Sur les réceptions élégiaques d’une adaptation tibulléenne de Tite-Live’, Dictynna 6: 17–35.Google Scholar
Fabre-Serris, J. (2011) ‘Élégie érotique et discours satirique chez Properce’, MD 67: 51–78.Google Scholar
Fabre-Serris, J. (2023) ‘Generic polemic in the Bucolics: Vergil, Gallus, and remedia amoris’, in Keith & Myers 2023: 48–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fabre-Serris, J. (2024) ‘Roman topography, politics and gender: the cult of Bona Dea in Propertius 4.9 – an answer to Aeneid 8?’, in Gale & Chahoud 2024: 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fantham, E. (1997) ‘Images of the city: Propertius’ new-old Rome’, in Habinek, T. & Schiesaro, A. (eds.), The Roman Cultural Revolution. Cambridge: 122–35. Repr. in Greene & Welch 2012: 302–19.Google Scholar
Fantuzzi, M. (2003) ‘Pastoral love and “elegiac” love, from Greece to Rome’, LICS 2.3: 1–11.Google Scholar
Fantuzzi, M. & Hunter, R. L. (2004) Tradition and Innovation in Hellenistic Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. (1991) Vergil’s Georgics and the Traditions of Ancient Epic: The Art of Allusion in Literary History. Oxford.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. (1999) ‘The Ovidian corpus: Poetic body and poetic text’, in Hardie, Barchiesi & Hinds 1999: 127–41.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. (2012) ‘Calling out the Greeks: Dynamics of the elegiac canon’, in Gold 2012: 9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, J. & Putnam, M. C. J. (eds.) (2010) A Companion to Vergil’s Aeneid and its Tradition. Malden, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faulkner, A. (2011) ‘Introduction: Modern scholarship on the Homeric Hymns: Foundational issues’, in Faulkner, A. (ed.), The Homeric Hymns: Interpretative Essays. Oxford: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fay, L. E. (1980) ‘Shostakovich versus Volkov: Whose Testimony?’, Russian Review 39.4: 484–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedeli, P. (1974) ‘Properzio 1,3: Interpretazione e proposte sull’origine dell’elegia latina’, MH 31.1: 23–41.Google Scholar
Fedeli, P. (1987a) ‘Properzio, fra culto del testo tradito e caccia alia corruttela’, in Freyburger 1987: 107–12. Trans. A. Talleur, ‘Propertius: Between the cult of the transmitted text and the hunt for corruption’, in Greene & Welch 2012: 31–41.Google Scholar
Fedeli, P. (1987b) ‘Acanthis e la sete dei morti (Prop. 4,5)’, in Raffaelli, R. (ed.), Rappresentazioni della morte. Urbino: 91–129.Google Scholar
Fedeli, P. (ed.) (1992) ‘Dal testo ellenistico al testo elegiaco: Ripresa e trasformazione dei codici letterari’, Aevum(ant) 5: 245–57.Google Scholar
Fedeli, P. (1994) ‘Ideologia augustea e poesia: Il mito di Ercole e Caco in Properzio’, in Rosen, K. (ed.), Macht und Kultur im Rom der Kaiserzeit. Bonn: 109–19.Google Scholar
Fedeli, P. (2005b) ‘Properzio e la poesia greca prealessandrina’, in Santini & Santucci 2005: 3–32.Google Scholar
Fedeli, P. (2008) ‘Killing Cynthia: Costruzione e decostruzione della donna elegiaca’, in Santini & Santucci 2008: 3–38.Google Scholar
Fedeli, P. (2012) ‘Il IV libro delle elegie fra l’Eneide virgiliana e l’ultima produzione lirica oraziana’, in Cristofoli, Santini & Santucci 2012: 3–18.Google Scholar
Fedeli, P. (2014) ‘Da Cinzia a Cornelia’, in Bonamente, Cristofoli & Santini 2014: 373–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedeli, P. (2015a) ‘Introduzione: in cerca di nuove vie per la poesia elegiaca’, in Fedeli, Dimundo & Ciccarelli 2015: 65–134.Google Scholar
Fedeli, P. (2015b) ‘Commento all’elegia I’, in Fedeli, Dimundo & Ciccarelli 2015: 141–395.Google Scholar
Fedeli, P. (2015c) ‘Commento all’elegia IV’, in Fedeli, Dimundo & Ciccarelli 2015: 592–712.Google Scholar
Fedeli, P. (2015d) ‘Commento all’elegia VI’, in Fedeli, Dimundo & Ciccarelli 2015: 799–900.Google Scholar
Fedeli, P. (2015e) ‘Commento all’elegia VIII’, in Fedeli, Dimundo & Ciccarelli 2015: 1005–1101.Google Scholar
Fedeli, P. (2015f) ‘Commento all’elegia IX’, in Fedeli, Dimundo & Ciccarelli 2015: 1102–97.Google Scholar
Fedeli, P. (2015g) ‘Commento all’elegia XI’, in Fedeli, Dimundo & Ciccarelli 2015: 1265–1410.Google Scholar
Fedeli, P. (2015h) ‘La sezione troiana di Prop. 4.1 alla luce dell’epos virgiliano’, in Günther & Fedeli 2015: 135–68.Google Scholar
Fedeli, P. (2016a) ‘Cantare le gesta del principe: Azio, dal 31 a.C. a 15 anni dopo’, Maia 68.2: 231–44.Google Scholar
Fedeli, P. (2016b) ‘Le ambiguità del mito’, in Bonamente, Cristofoli & Santini 2016: 11–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedeli, P. (2020) ‘Properzio e l’epos virgiliano: dall’annuncio al ricordo’, in Bonamente, Cristofoli & Santini 2020: 127–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedeli, P., Dimundo, R. & Ciccarelli, I. (eds.) (2015) Properzio: Elegie, Libro IV. 2 vols. Nordhausen.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. C. (1984) ‘The reconciliation of Juno’, CQ 34.1: 179–94. Repr. in Harrison 1990: 339–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeney, D. C. (1987) ‘Following after Hercules, in Virgil and Apollonius’, PVS 18: 47–85.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. C. (1991) The Gods in Epic: Poets and Critics of the Classical Tradition. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeney, D. C. (1998) Literature and Religion at Rome: Cultures, Contexts, and Beliefs. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. C. (2007) Caesar’s Calendar: Ancient Time and the Beginnings of History. Berkeley, CA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeney, D. C. (2016) ‘Horace and the literature of the past: Lyric, epic, and history in Odes 4’, in Delignon, B., Le Meur, N. & Thévenaz, O. (eds.), La poésie lyrique dans la cité antique: les Odes d’Horace au miroir de la lyrique grecque archaïque. Paris: 295–312.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. & Nelis, D. (2005) ‘Two Virgilian acrostics: Certissima signa?’, CQ 55.2: 644–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felber, H., Wiesehöfer, J. & Wagner-Hasel, B. (2005) ‘Hospitality’, in Cancik, H. & Schneider, H. (eds.), Brill’s New Pauly, Vol. 6. Leiden: 528–32.Google Scholar
Feldherr, A. (1999) ‘Putting Dido on the map: Genre and geography in Vergil’s underworld’, Arethusa 32.1: 85–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldherr, A. (2014) ‘Viewing myth and history on the shield of Aeneas’, CA 33.2: 281–318.Google Scholar
Fernandelli, M. (1997) ‘“Serpent Imagery” e tragedia greca nel II libro dell’Eneide’, Orpheus 18.1: 141–56.Google Scholar
Fish, J. (2004) ‘Anger, Philodemus’ Good King, and the Helen Episode of Aeneid 2.567–589: A new proof of authenticity from Herculaneum’, in Armstrong, Fish, Johnston & Skinner 2004: 111–38.Google Scholar
Flaschenriem, B. L. (1998) ‘Speaking of women: “Female voice” in Propertius’, Helios 25.1: 49–64.Google Scholar
Flower, H. I. (2000) ‘The tradition of the Spolia Opima: M. Claudius Marcellus and Augustus’, ClAnt 19.1: 34–64.Google Scholar
Fowler, A. (1982) Kinds of Literature: An Introduction to the Theory of Genres and Modes. Oxford.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. P. (1983) ‘An acrostic in Vergil (Aeneid 7. 601–604)?’, CQ 33.1: 298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, D. P. (1991) ‘Narrate and describe: The problem of ekphrasis’, JRS 81: 25–35. Repr. in Fowler 2000: 64–85.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. P. (1997a) ‘On the shoulders of giants: Intertextuality and classical studies’, MD 39: 13–34. Repr. in Fowler 2000: 115–37.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. P. (1997b) ‘Second thoughts on closure’, in Roberts, Dunn & Fowler 1997: 3–22. Repr. in Fowler 2000: 284–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, D. P. (1998) ‘Opening the Gates of War: Aeneid 7.601–40’, in Stahl 1998: 155–74. Repr. in Fowler 2000: 173–92.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. P. (2000) Roman Constructions: Readings in Postmodern Latin. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, M. (1996) Roman Historical Myths: The Regal Period in Augustan Literature. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fratantuono, L. M. (2019) ‘Alma Phoebe: Lunar references in Virgil’s Aeneid’, GLB 24.1: 61–79.Google Scholar
Fratantuono, L. M. & Smith, R. A. (eds.) (2018) Virgil, Aeneid 8: Text, Translation, and Commentary. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freudenburg, K. (2014) ‘Recusatio as political theatre: Horace’s letter to Augustus’, JRS 104: 105–32.Google Scholar
Freyburger, G. (ed.) (1987) De Virgile à Jacob Balde: Hommage à Mme Andrée Thill (BFLM 15). Paris.Google Scholar
Frischer, B. (1983) ‘Inceptive quoque and the introduction medias in res in classical and early medieval Latin literature’, Glotta 61.3/4: 236–51.Google Scholar
Fuhrer, T. (1992) Die Auseinandersetzung mit den Chorlyrikern in den Epinikien des Kallimachos. Basel.Google Scholar
Fuhrer, T., Mundt, F. & Stenger, J. (eds.) (2015) Cityscaping: Constructing and Modelling Images of the City. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulkerson, L. (2005) The Ovidian Heroine as Author: Reading, Writing, and Community in the Heroides. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fusi, A. (2016) ‘Un verso callimacheo di Virgilio (Aen. 8.685): Nuovi argomenti a favore di una congettura negletta’, Lexis 34: 217–48.Google Scholar
Gagliardi, P. (2012) ‘Virgilio, Properzio e Gallo: A proposito di Virg. ecl. 10, 46–49 e Prop. 1, 8’, RÉL 90: 147–63.Google Scholar
Gaisser, J. H. (1983) ‘Amor, rura and militia in three elegies of Tibullus (1.1, 1.5 and 1.10)’, Latomus 42.1: 58–72.Google Scholar
Gale, M. R. (1997) ‘Propertius 2, 7: Militia amoris and the ironies of elegy’, JRS 87: 77–91. Repr. in Greene & Welch 2012: 273–301.Google Scholar
Gale, M. R. (ed.) (2000) Virgil on the Nature of Things: The Georgics, Lucretius and the Didactic Tradition. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, M. R. (2003) ‘Poetry and the backward glance in Virgil’s Georgics and Aeneid’, TAPhA 133.2: 323–52.Google Scholar
Gale, M. R. (ed.) (2004) Latin Epic and Didactic Poetry: Genre, Tradition and Individuality. Swansea.Google Scholar
Gale, M. R. (2007) ‘Lucretius and previous poetic traditions’, in Gillespie & Hardie 2007: 59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, M. R. (2019) ‘Name puns and acrostics in didactic poetry: Reading the universe’, in Canevaro, L. G. & O’Rourke, D. (eds.), Didactic Poetry of Greece, Rome and Beyond: Knowledge, Power, Tradition. Swansea: 123–50.Google Scholar
Gale, M. R. (2024) ‘Poetic and imperial spaces in Propertius, Books 1–3’, in Gale & Chahoud 2024: 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gale, M. R. & Chahoud, A. (eds.) (2024) The Augustan Space: The Poetics of Geography, Topography and Monumentality. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galinsky, G. K. (ed.) (1992) The Interpretation of Roman Poetry: Empiricism or Hermeneutics? Frankfurt am Main.Google Scholar
Ganiban, R. T. (2007) Statius and Virgil: The Thebaid and the Reinterpretation of the Aeneid. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garani, M. (2007) ‘Propertius’ temple of Jupiter Feretrius and the spolia opima (4.10): A poem not to be read?’, AC 76: 99–117.Google Scholar
Gazeau, M. (2010) ‘Les métamorphoses de Vertumne ou La recusatio propertienne de tous les récits’, RÉL 88: 137–55.Google Scholar
Gazeau, M. (2017) Le tombeau de Cynthia: Mythes, fictions et ironie dans le livre IV des Élégies de Properce. Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gazich, R. (1997) ‘Moenia disponere: Properzio, Callimaco e la città augustea’, Aevum(ant) 10: 289–336.Google Scholar
Genette, G. (1997) Palimpsests: Literature in the Second Degree, trans. C. Newman & C. Doubinsky. Lincoln, NE.Google Scholar
Giangrande, G. (1981) ‘Propertius, Callimachus Romanus?’, in Colloquium Propertianum secundum (Assisi, 9–11 novembre1979): Atti. Assisi: 147–67.Google Scholar
Gibson, C. A. (ed.) (2008) Libanius’s Progymnasmata: Model Exercises in Greek Prose Composition and Rhetoric. Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. K. (1999) ‘Aeneas as hospes in Vergil, Aeneid 1 and 4’, CQ 49.1: 184–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, R. K. (2002) ‘“Cf. e.g.”: A typology of “parallels” and the function of commentaries on Latin poetry’, in Gibson, R. K. & Kraus, C. S. (eds.), The Classical Commentary: Histories, Practices, Theory. Leiden: 331–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, R. K. (2007) Excess and Restraint: Propertius, Horace, and Ovid’s Ars Amatoria. London.Google Scholar
Gibson, R. K. (2018) ‘Propertius and the unstructured self’, in Frangoulidis, S. & Harrison, S. (eds.), Life, Love and Death in Latin Poetry. Berlin: 13–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, R. K. & Whitton, C. (eds.) (2023) The Cambridge Critical Guide to Latin Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gigante Lanzara, V. (1990) ‘Virgilio e Properzio’, in Gigante, M. (ed.), Virgilio e gli Augustei. Naples: 111–76.Google Scholar
Gillespie, S. & Hardie, P. R. (eds.) (2007) The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giusti, E. (2018) Carthage in Virgil’s Aeneid: Staging the Enemy under Augustus. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gladhill, B. & Myers, M. Y. (eds.) (2020) Walking Through Elysium: Vergil’s Underworld and the Poetics of Tradition. Toronto.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gold, B. K. (1993) ‘“But Ariadne was never there in the first place”: Finding the female in Roman poetry’, in Rabinowitz, N. S. & Richlin, A. (eds.), Feminist Theory and the Classics. New York: 75–101.Google Scholar
Gold, B. K. (2006) ‘How women (re)act in Roman love poetry: Inhuman she-wolves and unhelpful mothers in Propertius’ elegies’, Helios 33.2: 165–87.Google Scholar
Gold, B. K. (2007) ‘The natural and unnatural silence of women in the Elegies of Propertius’, Antichthon 41: 54–72. Repr. in Greene & Welch 2012: 355–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldschmidt, N. (2013) Shaggy Crowns: Ennius’ Annales and Virgil’s Aeneid. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goold, G. P. (1970) ‘Servius and the Helen Episode’, HSPh 74: 101–68. Repr. in Harrison 1990: 60–126.Google Scholar
Goold, G. P. (1988) ‘On editing Propertius’, in Horsfall, N. (ed.), Vir bonus discendi peritus: Studies in Celebration of Otto Skutsch’s Eightieth Birthday (BICS suppl. 51). London: 27–38.Google Scholar
Goold, G. P. (1989) ‘Problems in editing Propertius’, in Grant, J. N. (ed.), Editing Greek and Latin Texts. New York: 97–119.Google Scholar
Gowers, E. (2005) ‘Virgil’s Sibyl and the “many mouths” cliché (Aen. 6.625–7)’, CQ 55.1: 170–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gowers, E. (2016) ‘Dido and the owl’, in Mitsis, P. & Ziogas, I. (eds.), Wordplay and Powerplay in Latin Poetry. Berlin: 107–30.Google Scholar
Gowers, E. (2020) ‘Why isn’t Homer in Vergil’s underworld? – and other notable absences’, in Gladhill & Myers 2020: 206–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, S. J. (2004b) ‘Contextualization and textual criticism: Making sense of character in Propertius 4.4 and Ovid, Heroides 1’, CW 97.4: 363–72.Google Scholar
Greene, E. (1998) The Erotics of Domination: Male Desire and the Mistress in Latin Love Poetry. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Greene, E. (2005) ‘Gender identity and the elegiac hero in Propertius 2.1’, in Ancona & Greene 2005: 61–78.Google Scholar
Greene, E. & Welch, T. S. (eds.) (2012) Propertius. Oxford Readings in Classical Studies. Oxford.Google Scholar
Griffith, R. D. (1995) ‘Catullus’ Coma Berenices and Aeneas’ farewell to Dido’, TAPhA 125: 47–59.Google Scholar
Griffiths, A. (2002) ‘The Odes: Just where do you draw the line?’, in Woodman, T. & Feeney, D. C. (eds.), Traditions and Contexts in the Poetry of Horace. Cambridge: 65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grillo, L. (2011) ‘Leaving Troy and Creusa: Reflections on Aeneas’ flight’, CJ 106.1: 43–68.Google Scholar
Grimal, P. (1945) ‘Notes sur Properce I: la composition de l’élégie à Vertumne’, RÉL 23: 110–19.Google Scholar
Grimal, P. (1948) ‘La promenade d’Évandre et Énée à la lumière des fouilles récentes’, RÉA 50: 348–51.Google Scholar
Grimal, P. (1952) ‘Les intentions de Properce et la composition du livre IV des “Élégies”’, Latomus 11.2–4: 183–97, 315–26, 437–50.Google Scholar
Grimal, P. (1989) ‘Jupiter, Anchise et Vulcain: Trois rélévations sur le destin de Rome’, in Diggle, Hall & Jocelyn 1989: 1–13.Google Scholar
Gros, P. (2003) ‘Le bois sacré du Palatin: Une composante oubliée du sanctuaire augustéen d’Apollon’, RA 35.1: 51–66.Google Scholar
Guarducci, M. (1977) ‘Epigrammi greci in una casa romana di Assisi’, in Bigaroni & Santucci 1977: 123–9.Google Scholar
Günther, H.-C. & Fedeli, P. (eds.) (2015) Virgilian Studies: A Miscellany Dedicated to the Memory of Mario Geymonat. Nordhausen.Google Scholar
Gurval, R. A. (1995) Actium and Augustus: The Politics and Emotions of War. Ann Arbor, MI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C. (1962) A History of Greek Philosophy, Vol. I: The Earlier Presocratics and the Pythagoreans. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. J. (1985) ‘The lover and the lena: Propertius 4.5’, Ramus 14.2: 105–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. J. (1991) Theocritus’ Pastoral Analogies: The Formation of a Genre. Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. J. (1992) ‘Callimachus’ Lock of Berenice: Fantasy, romance, and propaganda’, AJPh 113.3: 359–85.Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. J. (1996) ‘The evidence for Theocritean poetry‐books’, in Harder, Regtuit & Wakker 1996: 119–48.Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. J. (ed.) (2005) The New Posidipppus: A Hellenistic Poetry Book. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. J. (2012) ‘The Hecale and Hellenistic conceptions of short hexameter narratives’, in Bär, S. & Baumbach, M. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Greek and Latin Epyllion and its Reception. Leiden: 221–44.Google Scholar
Habermehl, P. (2013) ‘Tod und Verklärung: Cynthias letzter Auftritt in den Elegien des Properz (4, 7 und 8)’, A&A 59.1: 58–79.Google Scholar
Habinek, T. N. (1998) The Politics of Latin Literature: Writing, Identity, and Empire in Ancient Rome. Princeton, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habinek, T. N. (2005) The World of Roman Song: From Ritualized Speech to Social Order. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Hadjittofi, F. (2008) ‘Callimachus’ sexy Athena: The Hymn to Athena and the Homeric Hymn to Aphrodite’, MD 60: 9–37.Google Scholar
Haffter, H. (1970) ‘Das Gedichtbuch als dichterische Aussage: Überlegungen zu den Elegien des Properz’, in Ableitinger-Gruenberger, D. & Gugel, H. (eds.), Festschrift Karl Vretska zum 70. Geburtstag überreicht von seinem Freunden und Schülern. Heidelberg: 53–67. Repr. in Eisenhut 1975: 160–73.Google Scholar
Hallett, C. H. (2012) ‘The archaic style in sculpture in the eyes of ancient and modern viewers’, in Coltman, V. (ed.), Making Sense of Greek Art. Exeter: 70–100.Google Scholar
Hallett, J. P. (1973) ‘The role of women in Roman elegy: Counter-cultural feminism’, Arethusa 6: 103–24. Repr. in J. Peradotto & J. P. Sullivan (eds.) (1984), Women in the Ancient World. New York: 241–62.Google Scholar
Hallett, J. P. (1985) ‘Queens, princeps and women of the Augustan elite: Propertius’ Cornelia-elegy and the Res Gestae Divi Augusti’, in Winkes, R. (ed.), The Age of Augustus: Interdisciplinary Conference Held at Brown University, April 30–May 2, 1982. Louvain-la-Neuve: 73–88.Google Scholar
Hallett, J. P. (2007) ‘Sulpicia and her fama: an intertextual approach to recovering her Latin literary image’, CW 100.1: 37–42.Google Scholar
Hallett, J. P. (2009) ‘Absent Roman fathers in the writings of their daughters: Cornelia and Sulpicia’, in Hübner, S. & Ratzan, D. M. (eds.), Growing up Fatherless in Antiquity. Cambridge: 175–91.Google Scholar
Hallett, J. P. (2019) ‘A love poet’s script for an Augustan power couple: Propertius 4.11’, in Bielman Sánchez, A. (ed.), Power Couples in Antiquity: Transversal Perspectives. London: 151–65.Google Scholar
Halperin, D. M. (1983) Before Pastoral: Theocritus and the Ancient Tradition of Bucolic Poetry. New Haven, CT.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harder, M. A. (1993) ‘Aspects of the structure of Callimachus’ Aetia’, in Harder, Regtuit & Wakker 1993: 99–110.Google Scholar
Harder, M. A. (2002) ‘Intertextuality in Callimachus’ Aetia’, in Lehnus & Montanari 2002: 189–233.Google Scholar
Harder, M. A. (2003) ‘The invention of past, present and future in Callimachus’ Aetia’, Hermes 131.3: 290–306.Google Scholar
Harder, M. A. (2011) ‘Callimachus as fragment’, in Acosta-Hughes, Lehnus & Stephens 2011: 63–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harder, M. A. (ed.) (2012a) Callimachus, Aetia: Introduction, Text, and Translation. Oxford.Google Scholar
Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F. & Wakker, G. C. (eds.) (1993) Callimachus (Hellenistica Groningana 1). Groningen.Google Scholar
Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F. & Wakker, G. C. (eds.) (1996) Theocritus (Hellenistica Groningana 2). Groningen.Google Scholar
Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F. & Wakker, G. C. (eds.) (2004) Callimachus II (Hellenistica Groningana 7). Leuven.Google Scholar
Hardie, A. (2002) ‘The Georgics, the mysteries and the muses at Rome’, PCPhS 48: 175–208.Google Scholar
Hardie, C. (1971) The Georgics: A Transitional Poem (The Third Jackson Knight Memorial Lecture). Abingdon-on-Thames.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. (1987) ‘Ships and ship names in the Aeneid’, in Whitby, M., Hardie, P. R. & Whitby, M. (eds.), Homo Viator: Classical Essays for John Bramble. Bristol: 163–71.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. (1992) ‘Augustan poets and the mutability of Rome’, in Powell 1992: 59–82.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. (1993b) ‘Vt pictura poesis? Horace and the visual arts’, in Rudd 1993: 120–39.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. (ed.) (1999) Virgil: Critical Assessments of Classical Authors, Vol. 1. London.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. (2006b) ‘Cultural and historical narratives in Virgil’s Eclogues and Lucretius’, in Fantuzzi, M. & Papanghelis, T. D. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Greek and Latin Pastoral. Leiden: 275–300. Rev. in Hardie 2009: 13–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardie, P. R. (2007a) ‘Poets, patrons, rulers: The Ennian traditions’, in Fitzgerald, W. & Gowers, E. (eds.), Ennius perennis: The Annals and Beyond. Cambridge: 129–44.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. (2007b) ‘Polyphony or Babel? Hosidius Geta’s Medea and the poetics of the cento’, in Swain, S. C. R., Harrison, S. J. & Elsner, J. (eds.), Severan Culture. Cambridge: 168–76.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. (2009) Lucretian Receptions: History, the Sublime, Knowledge. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R. (2012) ‘Virgil’s Catullan Plots’, in Du Quesnay, I. & Woodman, A. J. (eds.), Catullus: Poems, Books, Readers. Cambridge: 212–38.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. R., Barchiesi, A. & Hinds, S. (eds.) (1999) Ovidian Transformations: Essays on Ovid’s Metamorphoses and its Reception. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Harmon, D. P. (2014) ‘Rome, topography and architecture of’, in Thomas & Ziolkowski 2014: 1098–1104.Google Scholar
Harrison, E. L. (1972–3) ‘Why did Venus wear boots? Some reflections on Aeneid 1.314 f.’, PVS 12: 10–25.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (1989) ‘Augustus, the poets and the Spolia Opima’, CQ 39.2: 408–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (1997) ‘The survival and supremacy of Rome: The unity of the shield of Aeneas’, JRS 87: 70–6.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (1998) ‘The sword-belt of Pallas: Moral symbolism and political ideology’, in Stahl 1998: 223–42.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (2002) ‘Ovid and genre: Evolutions of an elegist’, in Hardie 2002b: 79–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (2005) ‘Hercules and Augustus in Propertius 4.9’, in Cairns, F. (ed.), Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar 12: Greek and Roman Poetry, Greek and Roman Historiography. Leeds: 117–31.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (2006) ‘The epic and the monuments: Interactions between Virgil’s Aeneid and the Augustan building programme’, in Clarke, Currie & Lyne 2006: 159–83.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (2007c) ‘The primal voyage and the ocean of epos: Two aspects of metapoetic imagery in Catullus, Virgil and Horace’, Dictynna 4, n.p.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (2013) Framing the Ass: Literary Texture in Apuleius’ Metamorphoses. Oxford.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (2015) ‘Vergil’s metapoetic katabasis: The underworld of Aeneid 6 and the history of epic’, in Günther & Fedeli 2015: 169–94.Google Scholar
Harrison, S. J. (2021) ‘Framing epigrams and elegy in Propertius Book 4’, in F. Cairns (ed.), Papers of the Langford Latin Seminar 18: Roman Poetry, Republican and Imperial. Prenton: 109–20.Google Scholar
Harrisson, J. (2019) ‘Reality and unreality: Literature and folklore in Propertius 4.7’, in Harrisson, J. (ed.), Imagining the Afterlife in the Ancient World. London: 133–51.Google Scholar
Hatch, J. S. (2007) ‘Poetic voices and Hellenistic antecedents in the Elegies of Propertius’. PhD diss. Cincinnati.Google Scholar
Hatch, N. L. (1959) ‘The time element in interpretation of Aeneid 2.575–6 and 585–87’, CPh 54.4: 255–7.Google Scholar
Heath, T. (1921) A History of Greek Mathematics, Vol. 1: From Thales to Euclid. Oxford.Google Scholar
Heerink, M. (2015) Echoing Hylas: A Study in Hellenistic and Roman Metapoetics. Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Heffernan, J. A. W. (1993) The Poetics of Ekphrasis from Homer to Ashbery. Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Heiden, B. (1987) ‘Laudes Herculeae: Suppressed savagery in the Hymn to Hercules, Verg. A. 8.285–305’, AJPh 108.4: 661–71.Google Scholar
Heimreich, C. (1864–7) ‘Novae quaestiones Propertianae’, Symbola Philologorum Bonnensium in Honorem Friderici Ritschelii collecta. Leipzig: 667–84.Google Scholar
Heinze, R. (1960) Ovids Elegische Erzählung, in E. Burck (ed.), Vom Geist des Römertums. Darmstadt: 308–403.Google Scholar
Heinze, R. (1993) Virgil’s Epic Technique, trans. H. Harvey, D. Harvey & F. Robertson. London.Google Scholar
Hemelrijk, E. A. (2004) ‘Masculinity and femininity in the Laudatio Turiae’, CQ 54.1: 185–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henkel, J. (2014a) ‘Metrical feet on the road of poetry: Foot puns and literary polemic in Tibullus’, CW 107.4: 451–75.Google Scholar
Henkel, J. (2014b) ‘Vergil talks technique: Metapoetic arboriculture in Georgics 2’, Vergilius 60: 33–66.Google Scholar
Hertzberg, W. A .B. (ed.) (1845) Sex. Aurelii Propertii elegiarum libri quattuor. Vol 3. Halle.Google Scholar
Heslin, P. J. (2010) ‘Virgil’s Georgics and the dating of Propertius’ first book’, JRS 100: 54–68.Google Scholar
Heslin, P. J. (2015) The Museum of Augustus: The Temple of Apollo in Pompeii, the Portico of Philippus in Rome, and Latin Poetry. Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
Heslin, P. J. (2018) Propertius, Greek Myth, and Virgil: Rivalry, Allegory, and Polemic. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hexter, R. (1990) ‘What was the Trojan horse made of? Interpreting Vergil’s Aeneid’, YJC 3.2: 109–31.Google Scholar
Hexter, R. (1992) ‘Sidonian Dido’, in Hexter, R. & Selden, D. (eds.), Innovations of Antiquity. New York: 332–84.Google Scholar
Heyne, C. G. (ed.) (1819) Publii Virgilii Maronis quae extant opera omnia, Vol. 3. Paris.Google Scholar
Heyworth, S. J. (1986) ‘Notes on Propertius Books III and IV’, CQ 36.1: 199–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyworth, S. J. (1993) ‘Deceitful Crete: Aeneid 3.84 and the Hymns of Callimachus’, CQ 43.1: 255–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyworth, S. J. (1995a) ‘Propertius: Division, transmission, and the editor’s task’, in Brock, R. & Woodman, A. J. (eds.), Papers of the Leeds International Latin Seminar 8: Roman Comedy, Augustan Poetry, Historiography. Leeds: 165–85.Google Scholar
Heyworth, S. J. (1995b) ‘Dividing poems’, in Pecere, O. & Reeve, M. D. (eds.), Formative Stages of Classical Traditions: Latin Texts from Antiquity to Renaissance. Spoleto: 117–48.Google Scholar
Heyworth, S. J. (1999) ‘Textual notes on Propertius 4.3, 4.4, 4.5’, in Morton Braund, S. & Mayer, R. G. (eds.), Amor, Roma: Love and Latin Literature: Eleven Essays (and One Poem) by Former Research Students Presented to E. J. Kenney on his Seventy-Fifth Birthday (PCPhS Suppl. 22). Cambridge: 71–93.Google Scholar
Heyworth, S. J. (2007c) ‘An elegist’s career: From Cynthia to Cornelia’, in Hardie, P. R. & Moore, H. (eds.), Classical Literary Careers and Their Reception. Cambridge: 89–104.Google Scholar
Heyworth, S. J. & Morwood, J. H. W. (eds.) (2011) A Commentary on Propertius, Book 3. Oxford.Google Scholar
Hill, J. (2021) ‘True friendship: Ennius and other poets in Catullus 116’, TAPhA 151.1: 155–84.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. E. (1983) ‘Carmina Digna: Gallus P. Qaṣr Ibrîm 6–7 metamorphosed’, in Cairns, F. (ed.) (1984), Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar 4: 43–54.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. E. (1987a) The Metamorphosis of Persephone: Ovid and the Self-Conscious Muse. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. E. (1987c) ‘The poetess and the reader: Further steps towards Sulpicia’, Hermathena 143: 29–46.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. E. (1998) Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. E. (1999) ‘After exile: Time and teleology from Metamorphoses to Ibis’, in Hardie, Barchiesi & Hinds 1999: 48–67.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. E. (2000) ‘Essential epic: Genre and gender from Macer to Statius’, in Depew & Obbink 2000: 221–44.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. E. (2002) ‘Landscapes with figures: Aesthetics of place in the Metamorphoses and its tradition’, in Hardie 2002b: 122–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinds, S. E. (2006) ‘Venus, Varro and the vates: Towards the limits of etymologising interpretation’, Dictynna 3: 175–210.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. E. (2017) ‘Candida dividua colla tegente coma’, in Corcoran, P. (ed.), Line of Inquiry. Dublin: 60–1.Google Scholar
Holleman, A. W. J. (1977) ‘Propertius IV 9: An Augustan view of Roman religion’, RBPh 55.1: 79–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollis, A. S. (2006) ‘Propertius and Hellenistic poetry’, in Günther 2006a: 97–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtz, L. (2011) ‘Servius et Donat’, in Bouquet, M. & Méniel, B. (eds.), Servius et sa réception de l’Antiquité à la Renaissance, Rennes: 205–17 (https://books.openedition.org/pur/38287#bodyftn9, accessed 3 July 2022).Google Scholar
Holzberg, N. (2012) ‘Der “Böse” und die Augusteer: Cacus bei Livius, Vergil, Properz und Ovid’, Gymnasium 119.5: 449–62.Google Scholar
Holzberg, N. (2014) ‘Carmina compono, hic elegos: Properzio e Orazio’, in Bonamente, Cristofoli & Santini 2014: 279–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horsfall, N. M. (1971) ‘Numanus Remulus: Ethnography and propaganda in Aen., IX, 598 f.’, Latomus 30: 1108–16. Repr. in Harrison 1990: 305–15.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. M. (1973) ‘Dido in the light of history’, PVS 13: 1–13. Repr. in Harrison 1990: 127–44.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. M. (1981) ‘Virgil and the conquest of chaos’, Antichthon 15: 141–50. Repr. in Harrison 1990: 466–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horsfall, N. M. (1987) ‘From history to legend: M. Manlius and the geese’, in Bremmer, J. & Horsfall, N. (eds.), Roman Myth and Mythography (BICS Suppl. 52). London: 63–75.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. M. (1991a) Virgilio: l’epopea in alambicco (Forme, Materiali e Ideologie del Mondo Antico 31). Naples.Google Scholar
Horsfall, N. M. (2016) The Epic Distilled: Studies in the Composition of the Aeneid. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höschele, R. (2009) ‘Catullus’ Callimachean hair-itage and the erotics of translation’, RFIC 137.1–2: 118–52.Google Scholar
Hubaux, J. (1957) ‘Parthenius. Gallus. Virgile. Properce’, in Miscellanea Properziana: Atti dell’Accademia Properziana del Subasio 5. Assisi: 31–8.Google Scholar
Hunt, A. (2010) ‘Elegiac grafting in Pomona’s orchard: Ovid, Metamorphoses 14. 623–771’, MD 65: 43–58.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. (1993) The Argonautica of Apollonius: Literary Studies. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. L. (1995) ‘The divine and human map of the Argonautica’, Syllecta classica 6: 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. L. (1996) Theocritus and the Archaeology of Greek Poetry. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. L. (2003) ‘Literature and its contexts’, in Erskine, A. (ed.), A Companion to the Hellenistic World. Oxford: 477–93.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. (2006) The Shadow of Callimachus: Studies in the Reception of Hellenistic Poetry at Rome. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, R. L. (ed.) (2008) ‘The poetics of narrative in the Argonautica’, in Papanghelis & Rengakos 2008: 115–46.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. (1984) ‘Propertius and the unity of the book’, JRS 74: 99–106. Repr. in Greene & Welch 2012: 186–202.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. (2008) Talking Books: Readings in Hellenistic and Roman Books of Poetry. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, G. O. (2013) Greek to Latin: Frameworks and Contexts for Intertextuality. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huttner, U. (1997) Die politische Rolle der Heraklesgestalt im griechischen Herrschertum (Historia, Einzelschriften 112). Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Ingleheart, J. (2007) ‘Propertius 4.10 and the end of the Aeneid: Augustus, the spolia opima and the right to remain silent’, G&R 54.1: 61–81.Google Scholar
Isaac, B. H. (2004) The Invention of Racism in Classical Antiquity. Princeton, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jachmann, G. (1957) ‘Versus Coae vestis’, in Miscellanea Properziana (Atti dell’Accad. Properziana del Subasio 5). Assisi: 39–47.Google Scholar
James, S. L. (2002) ‘Future perfect feminine: Women past and present in Vergil’s Aeneid’, in Quartarone, L. N. (ed.), Approaches to Teaching Vergil’s Aeneid. New York: 138–46.Google Scholar
James, S. L. (2003) Learned Girls and Male Persuasion: Gender and Reading in Roman Love Elegy. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
James, S. L. (2010) ‘Ipsa dixerat: Women’s words in Roman love elegy’, Phoenix 64.3–4: 314–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, S. L. (2012) ‘Re-reading Propertius’ Arethusa’, Mnemosyne 65.3: 425–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansen, L. (ed.) (2014a) The Roman Paratext: Frame, Texts, Readers. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansen, L. (2014b) ‘Modern covers and paratextual strategy in Ovidian elegy’, in Jansen 2014: 262–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansen-Winkeln, K. (2008) ‘Schoinos’, in Cancik, H. & Schneider, H. (eds.), Brill’s New Pauly, Vol. 13. Leiden: 63–4.Google Scholar
Jenkyns, R. (1998) Virgil’s Experience: Nature and History, Times, Names, and Places. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jocelyn, H. D. (1979) ‘Vergilius’ cacozelus (Donatus, Vita Vergilii 44)’, in Cairns, F. (ed.) (1980), Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar 2: Vergil and Roman Elegy, Medieval Latin Poetry and Prose, Greek Lyric and Drama. Liverpool: 67–142.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. R. (1973) ‘The emotions of patriotism: Propertius 4.6’, California Studies in Classical Antiquity 6: 151–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, W. R. (1990) ‘Messalla’s birthday: The politics of pastoral’, Arethusa 23.1: 95–113.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. R. (1997) ‘Final exit: Propertius 4.11’, in Roberts, Dunn & Fowler 1997: 163–80.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. R. (2009) A Latin Lover in Ancient Rome: Readings in Propertius and His Genre. Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
Johnston, P. A. (1980) Vergil’s Agricultural Golden Age: A Study of the Georgics. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, P. A. (1987) ‘Dido, Berenice, and Arsinoe: Aeneid 6.460’, AJPh 108.4: 649–54.Google Scholar
Kaesser, C. (2005) ‘The meaning of origins: Callimachus Aetia, Propertius IV, and Ovid Fasti’. PhD diss. Oxford.Google Scholar
Kahn, A. (2013) ‘Russian elegists and Latin lovers in the long eighteenth century’, in Thorsen 2013: 336–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kampakoglou, A. (2013) ‘Victory, mythology and the poetics of intercultural praise in Callimachus’ Victoria Berenices’, TiC 5.1: 111–43.Google Scholar
Karacsony, R. (2018) Properzens Vertumnus-Elegie (4,2) und das Dichtungsprogramm des vierten Buches: Ein intertextueller Kommentar. Stuttgart.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, J. T. (2008) ‘Vergil translates Aratus: Phaenomena 1–2 and Georgics 1.1–2’, MD 60: 105–23.Google Scholar
Kazanskaya, M. N. (2017) ‘Autumn dreams: Servius on Aen. 6, 282–284’, PhilClass 12.2: 142–53.Google Scholar
Keeline, T. (2017) ‘A poet on the margins: Vergil and the Theocritean scholia’, CPh 112.4: 456–78.Google Scholar
Keith, A. M. (1992) ‘Amores 1.1: Propertius and the Ovidian programme’, in Deroux, C. (ed.), Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History 6. Brussels: 327–44.Google Scholar
Keith, A. M. (1994) ‘Corpus eroticum: Elegiac poetics and elegiac puellae in Ovid’s Amores’, CW 88.1: 27–40.Google Scholar
Keith, A. M. (1997) ‘Tandem venit amor: A Roman woman speaks of love’, in Hallett & Skinner 1997: 295–310.Google Scholar
Keith, A. M. (1999) ‘Slender verse: Roman elegy and ancient rhetorical theory’, Mnemosyne 52.1: 41–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keith, A. M. (2015) ‘Cityscaping in Propertius and the elegists’, in Fuhrer, Mundt & Stenger 2015: 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keith, A. M. (2022) ‘Virgilian loci in Propertius Book 4.1’, in James, S. L. (ed.), Golden Cynthia: Essays on Propertius. Ann Arbor, MI: 139–60.Google Scholar
Kellum, B. (1985) ‘Sculptural programs and propaganda in Augustan Rome: The temple of Apollo on the Palatine’, in Winkes, R. (ed.), The Age of Augustus: Interdisciplinary Conference Held at Brown University, April 30–May 2, 1982. Louvain-la-Neuve: 169–76.Google Scholar
Kelly, P. (2020) ‘Crafting chaos: Intelligent design in Ovid, Metamorphoses Book 1 and Plato’s Timaeus’, CQ 70.2: 734–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, D. F. (1987) ‘Arcades ambo: Virgil, Gallus and Arcadia’, Hermathena 143: 47–59.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. F. (1992) ‘“Augustan” and “anti-Augustan”: Reflections on terms of reference’, in Powell 1992: 26–58.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. F. (1993) The Arts of Love: Five Studies in the Discourse of Roman Love Elegy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. F. (1997) ‘Modern receptions and their interpretative implications’, in Martindale 1997a: 38–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, D. F. (2002) Rethinking Reality: Lucretius and the Textualization of Nature. Ann Arbor, MI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, D. F. (2005) ‘Intention and the subject of interpretation: A response’, Phoenix 59.1–2: 143–9.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. F. (2019) ‘Modern receptions and their interpretative implications: The case of T. S. Eliot’, in Mac Góráin & Martindale 2019b: 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, D. F. (2020) ‘On not being modern: Exploring historical ontology with Bruno Latour’, in Turner, A. (ed.), Reconciling Ancient and Modern Philosophies of History, Berlin: 43–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, G. A. (1972) The Art of Rhetoric in the Roman World, 300 B.C.–A.D. 300, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Kenney, E. J. (1983) ‘Virgil and the elegiac sensibility’, ICS 8.1: 44–59. Repr. in Hardie 1999: 68–83.Google Scholar
Keppie, L. J. F. (1983) Colonisation and Veteran Settlement in Italy, 47–14 B.C. London.Google Scholar
Kerrigan, C. (ed.) (2020) Virgil’s Map: Geography, Empire, and the Georgics. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keyssner, K. (1938) ‘Die bildende Kunst bei Properz’, in Herbig, R. (ed.), Würzburger Festgabe H. Bulle dargebracht zum 70. Geburtstage. Stuttgart: 169–89. Repr. in Eisenhut 1975: 264–86.Google Scholar
Kierdorf, W. (1995) ‘Properzens Actium-Elegie (4,6): Künstlerische Bewältigung einer politischen Annäherung’, in Binder, G. & Effe, B. (eds.), Affirmation und Kritik: Zur politischen Funktion von Kunst und Literatur im Altertum (Bochumer altertumswissenschaftliches Colloquium 20). Trier: 165–84.Google Scholar
Kirichenko, A. (2013) ‘Virgil’s Augustan temples: Image and intertext in the Aeneid’, JRS 103: 65–87.Google Scholar
Kirichenko, A. (2018) ‘Der Durst des Hercules: Kallimachos, Augustus und die Liebeselegie in Properz 4, 9’, PhilClass 13.1: 82–94.Google Scholar
Kirichenko, A. (2022) ‘Callimachus Romanus: Propertius’ love elegy and the aetiology of empire’, in Wessels, A. B. & Klooster, J. J. H. (eds.), Inventing Origins? Aetiological Thinking in Greek and Roman Antiquity, Leiden: 65–100.Google Scholar
Klein, F. (2021) ‘Gendered intertextuality: Feminizing the Alexandrian models in Propertius’ Actian poetry’, in Fabre-Serris, J., Keith, A. M. & Klein, F. (eds.), Identities, Ethnicities and Gender in Antiquity, Berlin: 115–34.Google Scholar
Klein, F. N. (2024) ‘aurea nunc, olim siluestribus horrida dumis: the luci Molorci and the Augustan Space in Virgil’s Georgics and Aeneid 8’, in Gale & Chahoud 2024: 98–113.Google Scholar
Knauer, G. N. (1964a) Die Aeneis und Homer: Studien zur poetischen Technik Vergils mit Listen der Homerzitate in der Aeneis (Hypomnemata 7). Göttingen.Google Scholar
Knauer, G. N. (1964b) ‘Vergil’s Aeneid and Homer’, GRBS 5.2: 61–84. Repr. in Harrison 1990: 390–412.Google Scholar
Knox, B. M. W. (1950) ‘The serpent and the flame: The imagery of the second book of the Aeneid’, AJPh 71.4: 379–400.Google Scholar
Knox, P. E. (1986) Ovid’s Metamorphoses and the Traditions of Augustan Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Knox, P. E. (2011) ‘The Heroides: Elegiac voices’, in Boyd, B. W. (ed.), Brill’s Companion to Ovid. Leiden: 117–39.Google Scholar
Koster, S. (1983) ‘Die Etymologien des Properz’, in Koster, S. (ed.), Tessera: Sechs Beiträge zur Poesie und poetischen Theorie der Antike. Erlangen: 47–54.Google Scholar
Kouremenos, T. (1996) ‘Herakles, Jason and “programmatic” similes in Apollonius Rhodius’ Argonautica’, RhM 139.3–4: 233–50.Google Scholar
Kraggerud, E. (1998) ‘Virgil announcing the Aeneid: On Georgics 3.1–48’, in Stahl 1998: 1–20.Google Scholar
Kraus, C. S. (2005) ‘Hair, hegemony, and historiography: Caesar’s style and its earliest critics’, in Reinhardt, T., Lapidge, M. & Adams, J. N. (eds.), Aspects of the Language of Latin Prose (Proceedings of the British Academy 129). Oxford: 97–115.Google Scholar
Krause, E. (1884) Quibus temporibus quoque ordine Vergilius Eclogas scripserit. PhD diss. Berlin.Google Scholar
Kristeva, J. (1980) ‘Word, dialogue and novel’, in Kristeva, J. (ed. L. S. Roudiez), Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature. New York: 64–91. Trans. of ‘Bakhtine, le mot, le dialogue et le roman’, Critique 239 (1967): 438–65.Google Scholar
Kristeva, J. (2002) ‘“Nous deux” or a (hi)story of intertextuality’, Romanic Review 93: 7–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyriakou, P. (1995) Homeric Hapax Legomena in the Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius: A Literary Study. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Labate, M. (1991) ‘Città morte, città future: Un tema della poesia augustea’, Maia 43: 167–84.Google Scholar
Labate, M. (2016) ‘The night of reason: The Esquiline and witches in Horace’, in Hardie 2016: 74–94.Google Scholar
Lada-Richards, I. (2019) ‘On taking our sources seriously: Servius and the theatrical life of Vergil’s Eclogues’, ClAnt 38.1: 91–140.Google Scholar
Laird, A. (1996) ‘Ut figura poesis: Writing art and the art of writing in Augustan poetry’, in Elsner 1996: 75–102.Google Scholar
Laird, A. (1999) Powers of Expression, Expressions of Power: Speech Presentation in Latin Literature. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lallemant-Maron, J. (1972) ‘Architecture et philosophie dans l’œuvre virgilienne’, Euphrosyne 5: 447–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange, C. H. (2009) Res Publica Constituta: Actium, Apollo and the Accomplishment of the Triumviral Assignment. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange, D. K. (1979) ‘Cynthia and Cornelia: Two voices from the grave’, in Deroux, C. (ed.), Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History 1. Brussels: 335–42.Google Scholar
La Penna, A. (1979) ‘Sibila torquet (Prop. IV 8,8): storia (tentata) di una callida iunctura’, Maia 31: 135–7.Google Scholar
Laroche, R. A. (2002) ‘The symbolic number 3: Its role in the Aeneid’, in Defosse 2002: 287–304.Google Scholar
Leach, E. W. (1978) ‘Vergil, Horace, Tibullus: Three collections of ten’, Ramus 7: 79–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, E. W. (1988) The Rhetoric of Space: Literary and Artistic Representations of Landscape in Republican and Augustan Rome. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Leach, E. W. (2008) ‘Hypermestra’s querela: Coopting the Danaids in Horace Ode 3.11 and in Augustan Rome’, CQ 102.1: 13–32.Google Scholar
Lee-Stecum, P. (2005) ‘Tot in uno corpore formae: Hybridity, ethnicity and Vertumnus in Propertius Book 4’, Ramus 34.1: 22–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefèvre, E. (1966a) Propertius ludibundus: Elemente des Humors in seinen Elegien. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Lefèvre, E. (1966b) ‘Form und Funktion der Einleitungselegie des 4. Buches des Properz’, WS 79: 427–42.Google Scholar
Lehnus, L. & Montanari, F. (eds.) (2002) Callimaque: sept exposés suivis de discussions (Fondation Hardt Entretiens sur l’Antiquité Classique 48). Geneva.Google Scholar
Lentano, M. (2012) ‘Properzio e i valori privati del mos maiorum: Una lettura dell’elegia 4, 11’, in Cristofoli, Santini & Santucci 2012: 111–38.Google Scholar
Levene, D. S. & Nelis, D. P. (eds.) (2002) Clio and the Poets: Augustan Poetry and the Traditions of Ancient Historiography. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, B. (1974) ‘The rape of Troy: Infantile perspective in Book II of the Aeneid’, Arethusa 7.1: 103–13.Google Scholar
Lieberg, G. (1982) Poeta creator: Studien zu einer Figur der antiken Dichtung. Amsterdam.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebeschuetz, W. (2013) ‘Propertius IV, 1: Introducing the last book of Propertius’, Latomus 72.4: 971–83.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, J. L. (ed.) (1999) Parthenius of Nicaea: The Poetical Fragments and the Erōtika Pathēmata. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lindheim, S. H. (1998a) ‘I am dressed, therefore I am? Vertumnus in Propertius 4.2 and in Metamorphoses 14.622–771’, Ramus 27.1: 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindheim, S. H. (1998b) ‘Hercules cross-dressed, Hercules undressed: Unmasking the construction of the Propertian amator in elegy 4.9’, AJPh 119.1: 43–66.Google Scholar
Lindheim, S. H. (2003) Mail and Female: Epistolary Narrative and Desire in Ovid’s Heroides. Madison, WI.Google Scholar
Lindsay, W. M. (ed.) (1903) Nonii Marcelli De Compendiosa Doctrina Libros XX. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Lipka, M. (2001) Language in Vergil’s Eclogues (Untersuchungen zur antiken Literatur und Geschichte 60). Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liubzhin, A. (2005) ‘La terza edizione completa di Properzio in lingua russa’, in Santini & Santucci 2005: 477–80.Google Scholar
Liveley, G. (2010) ‘Cynthia prima fuit, Cynthia finis erit: Time and narrative in Propertius 4’, Helios 37.2: 111–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liveley, G. & Salzman-Mitchell, P. (2008) ‘Narrating in couplets’, in Liveley, G. & Salzman-Mitchell, P. (eds.), Latin Elegy and Narratology: Fragments of Story. Columbus, OH: 1–13.Google Scholar
Liverani, P. (1987) Municipium Augustum Veiens: Veio in età imperiale attraverso gli scavi Giorgi (1811–13) (Studia Archaeologica 43). Rome.Google Scholar
Lobel, E., Roberts, C. H. & Wegener, E. P. (eds.) (1941) The Oxyrhynchus Papyri 18: Nos. 2157–2207. London.Google Scholar
Loehr, J. (1996) Die Mehrfacherklärungen Ovids in der Tradition der aitiologischen Dichtung. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Longley, M. (2009) ‘Lapsed classicist’, in Harrison, S. J. (ed.), Living Classics: Greece and Rome in Contemporary Poetry in English. Oxford: 97–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovatt, H. (2013) The Epic Gaze: Vision, Gender and Narrative in Ancient Epic. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, D. (2010) ‘The symbolic value of grafting in ancient Rome’, TAPhA 140.2: 461–88.Google Scholar
Lowe, D. (2013) ‘Women scorned: A new stichometric allusion in the Aeneid’, CQ 63.1: 442–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, D. (2014) ‘A stichometric allusion to Catullus 64 in the Culex’, CQ 64.2: 862–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, D. (2015) ‘A stichometric allusion to Catullus 64 in the Culex: An addendum’, CQ 65.2: 891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowrie, M. (2009) Writing, Performance, and Authority in Augustan Rome. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowrie, M. (2011) ‘Divided voices and imperial identity in Propertius 4.1 and Derrida: Monolingualism of the Other and politics of friendship’, Dictynna 8: n.p.Google Scholar
Luisi, A. (2008) ‘Le divinità italiche nell’elegia di Properzio’, in Santini & Santucci 2008: 405–22.Google Scholar
Lulli, L. (2016) ‘Elegy and epic: A complex relationship’, in Swift, L. & Carey, C. (eds.), Iambus and Elegy: New Approaches, Oxford: 192–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luz, C. (2010) Technopaignia: Formspiele in der griechischen Dichtung. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyne, Raphael (2016) Memory and Intertextuality in Renaissance Literature. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyne, R. O. A. M. (1994) ‘Vergil’s Aeneid: Subversion by intertextuality: Catullus 66.39–40 and other examples’, G&R 41.2: 187–204.Google Scholar
Lyne, R. O. A. M. (1998a) ‘Propertius 2.10 and 11 and the structure of Books “2a” and “2b”’, JRS 88: 21–36.Google Scholar
Lyne, R. O. A. M. (1998b) ‘Propertius and Tibullus: Early exchanges’, CQ 48.2: 519–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacDonald, C. (2016) ‘Rewriting Rome: Topography, etymology and history in Varro De lingua Latina 5 and Propertius Elegies 4’, Ramus 45.2: 192–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mac Góráin, F. & Martindale, C. (eds.) (2019) The Cambridge Companion to Virgil. 2nd edn. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Maciver, C. A. (2012) Quintus Smyrnaeus’ Posthomerica: Engaging Homer in Late Antiquity. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackil, E. (2013) Creating a Common Polity: Religion, Economy, and Politics in the Making of the Greek Koinon. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Macleod, C. W. (1976) ‘Propertius 4, 1’, in Cairns, F. (ed.) (1977), Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar 1976: Classical Latin Poetry; Medieval Latin Poetry; Greek Poetry. Liverpool: 141–53.Google Scholar
Mader, G. (1991) ‘Changing forms: An addendum to Propertius 4,2,21–48’, WS 104: 131–47.Google Scholar
Mader, G. (2016) ‘Herculeus labor – labor limae: Epic arithmetic at Virgil, Aeneid 8.230–2’, CQ 66.2: 800–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malamud, M. (1998) ‘Gnawing at the end of the rope: Poets on the field in two Vergilian catalogues’, Ramus 27.2: 95–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maltby, R. (1981) ‘Love and marriage in Propertius 4.3’, in Cairns, F. (ed.), Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar 3. Liverpool: 243–7.Google Scholar
Maltby, R. (1999) ‘Tibullus and the language of Latin elegy’, in Adams & Mayer 1999: 377–98.Google Scholar
Manuwald, G. (ed.) (2018) Cicero, Agrarian Speeches: Introduction, Text, Translation, and Commentary. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marincola, J. (2010) ‘Eros and empire: Virgil and the historians on civil war’, in Kraus, C. S., Marincola, J. & Pelling, C. (eds.), Ancient Historiography and its Contexts: Studies in Honour of A. J. Woodman. Oxford: 183–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, P. (2015) ‘Asconius Pedianus, Quintus’, Oxford Classical Dictionary (online) (https://doi-org.eux.idm.oclc.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199381135.013.854, accessed 26 July 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martindale, C. (1993) Redeeming the Text: Latin Poetry and the Hermeneutics of Reception. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Martindale, C. (ed.) (1997b) ‘Green politics: The Eclogues’, in Martindale 1997a: 107–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martindale, C. (2019) ‘Green politics: The Eclogues’, in Mac Góráin & Martindale 2019: 173–92.Google Scholar
Marx, A. (1884) De S. Propertii vita et librorum ordine temporibusque. PhD diss. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Massa-Pairault, F.-H. (2014) ‘Properzio tra l’Etruria e Roma’, in Bonamente, Cristofoli & Santini 2014: 147–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massimilla, G. (ed.) (2010) Callimaco, Aitia: libro terzo e quarto (Biblioteca di Studi Antichi 92). Pisa.Google Scholar
Mastroiacovo, C. (2005) ‘Il serpente e la vergine: Inversion dei ruoli in Properzio 4.8’, in Santini & Santucci 2005: 383–93.Google Scholar
Maury, P. (1944) ‘Le secret de Virgile et l’architecture des Bucoliques’, in Lettres d’Humanité, Vol. 3. Paris: 71–147.Google Scholar
McAuley, M. (2016) Reproducing Rome: Motherhood in Virgil, Ovid, Seneca, and Statius. Oxford.Google Scholar
McGill, S. (2005) Virgil Recomposed: The Mythological and Secular Centos in Antiquity. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGinn, T. A. J. (2004) The Economy of Prostitution in the Roman World: A Study of Social History and the Brothel. Ann Arbor, MI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNamee, K. (1993) ‘Propertius, poetry, and love’, in DeForest, M. (ed.), Woman’s Power, Man’s Game: Essays on Classical Antiquity in Honor of Joy K. King, Wauconda, IL: 215–48.Google Scholar
McNelis, C. (2003) ‘Mourning glory: Callimachus’ Hecale and heroic honors’, MD 50: 155–61.Google Scholar
Meillier, C. (1985) ‘La composition numérique du livre III des Élégies de Properce’, RÉL 63: 101–17.Google Scholar
Merli, E. (2000) Arma canant alii: Materia epica e narrazione elegiaca nei Fasti di Ovidio. Florence.Google Scholar
Michalopoulos, A. N. (1998) ‘Some cases of Propertian etymologising’, in Cairns, F. & Heath, M. (eds.), Papers of the Leeds International Latin Seminar 10: Greek Poetry, Drama, Prose, Roman Poetry. Leeds: 235–50.Google Scholar
Miller, J. F. (1982) ‘Callimachus and the Augustan aetiological elegy’, ANRW 30.1: 371–417.Google Scholar
Miller, J. F. (1992) ‘The Fasti and Hellenistic didactic: Ovid’s variant aetiologies’, Arethusa 25.1: 11–31.Google Scholar
Miller, J. F. (2013) ‘Breaking the rules: Elegy, matrons and mime’, in Thorsen 2013: 239–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, P. A. (2004) Subjecting Verses: Latin Love Elegy and the Emergence of the Real. Princeton, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, P. A. & Platter, C. (1999) ‘Crux as symptom: Augustan elegy and beyond’, CW 92.5: 445–54.Google Scholar
Molyviati-Toptsis, U. (1995) ‘Sed falsa ad caelum mittunt insomnia manes (Aeneid 6.896)’, AJPh 116.4: 639–52.Google Scholar
Montanari Caldini, R. (1979) Horos e Properzio ovvero l’ispirazione necessaria. Florence.Google Scholar
Monti, R. C. (1981) The Dido Episode and the Aeneid: Roman Social and Political Values in the Epic. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moorton, R. F. (1990) ‘Love as death: The pivoting metaphor in Vergil’s story of Dido’, CW 83: 153–66.Google Scholar
Morello, R. (2008) ‘Segregam eam efficit: Vergil’s Camilla and the scholiasts’, in Casali, S. & Stok, F. (eds.), Servio: stratificazioni esegetiche e modelli culturali [Servius: Exegetical Stratifications and Cultural Models]. Brussels: 38–57.Google Scholar
Morgan, J. D. & Thomas, R. F. (2014) ‘Numerical patterns’, in Thomas & Ziolkowski 2014: 918–20.Google Scholar
Morgan, Ll. (1995) ‘Underhand Tactics: Milanion, Acontius and Gallus P. Qaṣr Ibrîm’, Latomus 54.1: 79–85.Google Scholar
Morgan, Ll (1998) ‘Assimilation and civil war: Hercules and Cacus’, in Stahl 1998: 175–97.Google Scholar
Morgan, Ll (2004) ‘Getting the measure of heroes: The dactylic hexameter and its detractors’, in Gale 2004: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Most, G. (1992) ‘Il poeta nell’Ade: Catabasi epica e teoria dell’epos tra Omero e Virgilio’, SIFC 10.2: 1014–26.Google Scholar
Murray, J. (2004) ‘The metamorphoses of Erysichthon: Callimachus, Apollonius, and Ovid’, in Harder, Regtuit & Wakker 2004: 207–42.Google Scholar
Mutschler, F.-H. (1996) ‘Hercules im Hain: Überlegungen zur Properzelegie 4, 9’, in Faber, R. & Seidensticker, B. (eds.), Worte, Bilder, Töne: Studien zur Antike und Antikerezeption: Bernhard Kytzler zu ehren. Würzburg: 115–28.Google Scholar
Myers, K. S. (1994) ‘Ultimus ardor: Pomona and Vertumnus in Ovid’s Met. 14.623–771’, CJ 89.3: 225–50.Google Scholar
Myers, K. S. (1996) ‘The poet and the procuress: The lena in Latin love elegy’, JRS 86: 1–21.Google Scholar
Myers, M. Y. (2008) ‘The frontiers of the empire and the edges of the world in the Augustan poetic imaginary’. PhD diss. Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
Myers, M. Y. (2020) ‘Vergil’s underworld and the afterlife of lovers and love poets’, in Gladhill & Myers 2020: 111–33.Google Scholar
Nadeau, Y. (1982) ‘Caesaries Berenices – or the hair of the god’, Latomus 41.1: 101–3.Google Scholar
Nadeau, Y. (1989) ‘Aristaeus: Augustus: Berenice: Aeneas’, Mnemosyne 42.1–2: 97–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Najbjerg, T. (2002–16) ‘The Severan Marble Plan of Rome (Forma Urbis Romae), fr. 20e’, http://formaurbis.stanford.edu/fragment.php?record=96 (accessed 9 May 2023).Google Scholar
Nau, F. (2009) ‘Vmbria Romani patria Callimachi: Le poète élégiaque et l’identité nationale romaine’, RÉL 87: 114–29.Google Scholar
Nauta, R. R. (1990) ‘Gattungsgeschichte als Rezeptionsgeschichte am Beispiel der Enstehung der Bukolik’, A&A 36.1: 116–37.Google Scholar
Nelis, B. (2020) ‘Sequor’, in Aberson, M., Dell’Oro, F., De Vaan, M., Viredaz, A. & Wachter, B. (eds.), [vøːrtər]: Mélanges de linguistique, de philologie et d’histoire ancienne offerts à Rudolf Wachter. Lausanne: 209–13.Google Scholar
Nelis, D. (1992) ‘The Aristaeus Episode and the Aeneid’, in Haan, E. A. M. (ed.), From Erudition to Inspiration: Essays in Honour of Michael McGann. Belfast: 3–18.Google Scholar
Nelis, D. (2004) ‘From didactic to epic: Georgics 2.458–3.48’, in Gale 2004: 73–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelis, D. (2005a) ‘The Roman Callimachus: Structure and coherence in the Propertian corpus’, in Kolde, A., Lukinovich, A. & Rey, A.-L. (eds.), Κορυφαίῳ ἀνδρί: Mélanges offertes à André Hurst. Geneva: 235–48.Google Scholar
Nelis, D. (2005b) ‘Patterns of time in Vergil: The Aeneid and the Aetia of Callimachus’, in Schwindt, J. P. (ed.), La représentation du temps dans la poésie augustéenne/Zur Poetik der Zeit in augusteischer Dichtung. Heidelberg: 71–83.Google Scholar
Nelis, D. (2007) ‘Et maintenant, Erato … : À propos d’Énéide VII, 37’, RÉA 109.1: 269–71.Google Scholar
Nelis, D. (2010) ‘Further voices in Propertius’ Cynthia’, in Fuhrer, T. & Nelis, D. P. (eds.), Acting with Words: Communication, Rhetorical Performance and Performative Acts in Latin Literature. Heidelberg: 47–61.Google Scholar
Nelis, D. (2015) ‘Vergilian cities: Visions of Troy, Carthage and Rome’, in Fuhrer, Mundt & Stenger 2015: 19–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nethercut, W. R. (1968a) ‘Notes on the structure of Propertius, Book IV’, AJPh 89.4: 449–64.Google Scholar
Nethercut, W. R. (1970) ‘The ironic priest. Propertius’ “Roman elegies”, III, 1–5: Imitations of Horace and Vergil’, AJPh 91.4: 385–407.Google Scholar
Newman, J. K. (2002) ‘Hercules in the Aeneid: The dementia of power’, in Defosse 2002: 398–411.Google Scholar
Newman, J. K. (2006) ‘The third book: Defining a poetic self’, in Günther 2006a: 319–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. (1991) ‘The style of Virgil’s Eclogues’, PVS 20: 1–14. Repr. in R. G. M. Nisbet (ed. Harrison, S. J. ) (1995), Collected Papers on Latin Literature. Oxford: 325–37.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. & Hubbard, M. (eds.) (1970) A Commentary on Horace: Odes Book I. Oxford.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. G. M. & Hubbard, M. (eds.) (1978) A Commentary on Horace: Odes Book II. Oxford.Google Scholar
Nugent, S. G. (1999) ‘The women of the Aeneid: Vanishing bodies, lingering voices’, in Perkell 1999: 251–70.Google Scholar
Obbink, D. (ed.) (1996) Philodemus, On Piety. Part 1: Critical Text with Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
O’Hara, J. J. (1990) Death and the Optimistic Prophecy in Vergil’s Aeneid. Princeton, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Hara, J. J. (1994) ‘They might be giants: Inconsistency and indeterminacy in Vergil’s war in Italy’, ColbyQ 30.3: 206–26.Google Scholar
O’Hara, J. J. (1996a) True Names: Vergil and the Alexandrian Tradition of Etymological Wordplay. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
O’Hara, J. J. (1996b) ‘Vergil’s best reader? Ovidian commentary on Vergilian etymological wordplay’, CJ 91.3: 255–76.Google Scholar
O’Hara, J. J. (2001) ‘Callimachean influences on Vergilian etymological wordplay’, CJ 96.4: 369–400.Google Scholar
O’Hara, J. J. (2007) Inconsistency in Roman Epic: Studies in Catullus, Lucretius, Vergil, Ovid and Lucan. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Hara, J. J. (2017) True Names: Vergil and the Alexandrian Tradition of Etymological Wordplay. 2nd edn. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Oliensis, E. (1997a) ‘Sons and lovers: Sexuality and gender in Virgil’s poetry’, in Martindale 1997a: 294–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliensis, E. (1997b) ‘The erotics of amicitia: Readings in Tibullus, Propertius and Horace’, Hallett & Skinner 1997: 151–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliensis, E. (2019) ‘Virgilian narrative: Ecphrasis’, in Mac Góráin & Martindale 2019: 425–44.Google Scholar
O’Neill, K. (1995) ‘Propertius 4.4: Tarpeia and the burden of aetiology’, Hermathena 158: 53–60.Google Scholar
O’Neill, K. (1998) ‘Symbolism and sympathetic magic in Propertius 4.5’, CJ 94.1: 49–80.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, D. (2008) ‘Letum non omnia finit: Reading Vergilian intertextuality in Propertius 4’. PhD diss. Dublin.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, D. (2011a) ‘The representation and misrepresentation of Virgilian poetry in Propertius 2.34’, AJPh 132.3: 457–97.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, D. (2011b) ‘“Eastern” elegy and “western” epic: Reading “orientalism” in Propertius 4 and Virgil’s Aeneid’, Dictynna 8, n.p.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, D. (2014) ‘Paratext and intertext in the Propertian poetry book’, in Jansen 2014a: 156–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Rourke, D. (2016) ‘The madness of elegy: Rationalizing Propertius’, in Hardie 2016: 199–217.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, D. (2017) ‘Hospitality narratives in Virgil and Callimachus: The ideology of reception’, CCJ 63: 118–42.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, D. (2018) ‘Make war not love: Militia amoris and domestic violence in Roman elegy’, in Gale, M. R. & Scourfield, J. H. D. (eds.), Texts and Violence in the Roman World. Cambridge: 110–39.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, D. (2020) ‘Elegies for Ireland: W. B. Yeats, Michael Longley, and the Roman elegists’, in Torrance, I. & O’Rourke, D. (eds.), Classics and Irish Politics, 1916–2016. Oxford: 291–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Rourke, D. (2024) ‘Hospitalité’, in Guez, J.-Ph., Klein, F., Peigney, J. & Prioux, E. (eds.), Dictionnaire des images du poétique dans l’Antiquité. Vol. 2. Paris: 801–3.Google Scholar
O’Rourke, D. & Pelttari, A. (2023) ‘Intertextuality’, in Gibson & Whitton 2023: 208–71.Google Scholar
Osgood, J. W. (2006) Caesar’s Legacy: Civil War and the Emergence of the Roman Empire. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Paduano, G. (1968) ‘Le reminiscenze dell’Alcesti nell’Elegia iv,11 di Properzio’, Maia 20: 21–8.Google Scholar
Paladini, M. L. (1958) ‘A proposito della tradizione poetica sulla battaglia di Azio’, Latomus 17.2–3: 240–69, 462–75.Google Scholar
Paley, F. A. (ed.) (1853) Sex. Aurelii Propertii Carmina: The Elegies of Propertius. London.Google Scholar
Palmore, A. (2016) ‘Callimachus’ Victoria Berenices: A case study in elegiac epyllion’, Aitia 6, online at: http://aitia.revues.org/1438 (accessed 7 January 2017).Google Scholar
Panayotakis, C. (2008) ‘Virgil on the popular stage’, in Hall, E. & Wyles, R. (eds.), New Directions in Ancient Pantomime. Oxford: 185–97.Google Scholar
Pandey, N. B. (2018) The Poetics of Power in Augustan Rome: Latin Poetic Responses to Early Imperial Iconography. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pandey, N. B. (2023) ‘Et in Arcadia ego: Vergil the elegist’, in Keith & Myers 2023: 301–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panoussi, V. (2007) ‘Polis and empire: Greek tragedy in Rome’, in Gregory, J. (ed.), A Companion to Greek Tragedy, Malden, MA: 413–27.Google Scholar
Panoussi, V. (2009) Greek Tragedy in Vergil’s Aeneid: Ritual, Empire, and Intertext. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panoussi, V. (2016) ‘Spinning Hercules: Gender, religion, and geography in Propertius 4.9’, CW 109.2: 179–94.Google Scholar
Papadimitropoulos, L. (2006) ‘Alexandrian adaptations of Heracles’ myth’, Παρνασσός 48: 41–68.Google Scholar
Papaioannou, S. (2005) Epic Succession and Dissension: Ovid, Metamorphoses 13.623–14.582, and the Reinvention of the Aeneid. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papaioannou, S. (2006) ‘The poetology of hairstyling and the excitement of hair loss in Ovid, Amores 1,14’, QUCC 83.2: 45–69.Google Scholar
Papanghelis, T. D. (1987) Propertius: A Hellenistic Poet on Love and Death. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papanghelis, T. D. & Rengakos, A. (eds.) (2008) Brill’s Companion to Apollonius Rhodius. 2nd edn. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paratore, E. (1957) ‘De Propertio Vergiliani carminis iudice’, Miscellanea Properziana: Atti dell’Accademia Properziana del Subasio 5. Assisi: 71–82.Google Scholar
Parker, H. N. (1992) ‘The fertile fields of Umbria: Prop. 1.22.10’, Mnemosyne 45.1: 88–92.Google Scholar
Parker, H. N. (1994) ‘Sulpicia, the Auctor de Sulpicia and the authorship of 3.9 and 3.11 of the Corpus Tibullianum’, Helios 21.1: 39–62.Google Scholar
Parkes, R. (2007) ‘Where was Hercules? A note on Vergil Aeneid 8.201–212’, Vergilius 53: 100–3.Google Scholar
Paschalis, M. (1997) ‘Virgil’s Arethusa (Ecl. 10.1–6) and the bucolic tradition’, in Papademetriou, J.-T. A. (ed.), Πρακτικά: Πρώτο Πανελλήνιο και δίεθνες συνέδριο αρχαίας Ελληνικής φιλολογίας (23–26 Μαϊου 1994)/Acta: First Panhellenic and International Conference on Ancient Greek Literature (23–26 May 1994). Athens: 713–26.Google Scholar
Pascucci, G. (1986) ‘Il callimachismo stilistico di Properzio’, in Bimillenario della morte di Properzio (Atti del convegno internazionale di studi properziani, Roma – Assisi, 21–26 maggio 1985). Assisi: 199–222.Google Scholar
Pasles, C. (1998) ‘Was he or wasn’t he?’, Los Angeles Times, 29 November 1998, www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1998-nov-29-ca-48630-story.html (accessed 24 August 2022).Google Scholar
Pasoli, E. (ed.) (1974) Sesto Properzio: Il libro quarto delle Elegie. Saggio introduttivo, testo e traduzione. 2nd ed. Bologna.Google Scholar
Pasoli, E. (1977) ‘Poesia d’amore e “metapoesia”: aspetti della modernità di Properzio’, in Bigaroni & Santucci 1977: 101–21.Google Scholar
Patillon, M. (ed.) (2008) Corpus Rhetoricum: Anonyme, Préambule à la rhétorique; Aphthonius, Progymnasmata; Pseudo-Hermogène, Progymnasmata. Paris.Google Scholar
Paton, W. R. (1918) The Greek Anthology, Vol. IV. Book 10: The Hortatory and Admonitory Epigrams; Book 11: The Convivial and Satirical Epigrams; Book 12: Strato’s Musa Puerilis. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Pausch, D. (2021) ‘Indue me Cois, fiam non dura puella: Kleidung und Konstruktion von Geschlechterrollen in Properz, Buch 4’, Gymnasium 128.5: 433–51.Google Scholar
Pease, A. S. (ed.) (1935) Publi Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Quartus. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Peirano, I. (2009) ‘Mutati artus: Scylla, Philomela and the end of Silenus’ song in Virgil Eclogue 6’, CQ 59.1: 187–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peirano, I. (2012) The Rhetoric of the Roman Fake: Latin Pseudepigrapha in Context. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pelttari, A. (2014) The Space that Remains: Reading Latin Poetry in Late Antiquity. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Perkell, C. G. (ed.) (1981) ‘On Creusa, Dido, and the quality of victory in Virgil’s Aeneid’, in Foley, H. P. (ed.), Reflections of Women in Antiquity. New York: 355–77.Google Scholar
Perkell, C. G. (1997) ‘The lament of Juturna: Pathos and interpretation in the Aeneid’, TAPhA 127: 257–86.Google Scholar
Perkell, C. G. (ed.) (1999) Reading Vergil’s Aeneid: An Interpretive Guide. Norman, OK.Google Scholar
Petrain, D. (2000) ‘Hylas and silva: Etymological wordplay in Propertius 1.20’, HSPh 100: 409–21.Google Scholar
Petrović, I. (2008) ‘Aitiologie des Triumphes – Triumph als Motiv in Properz 4,6’, in Krasser, H., Pausch, D. & Petrović, I. (eds.), Triplici invectus triumpho: der römische Triumph in augusteischer Zeit. Stuttgart: 191–208.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, R. (1968) History of Classical Scholarship from the Beginning to the End of the Hellenistic Age. Oxford.Google Scholar
Phillips, D. A. (2015) ‘Reading the civic landscape of Augustan Rome: Aeneid 1.421–429 and the building program of Augustus’, in Kemezis, A. M. (ed.), Urban Dreams and Realities in Antiquity: Remains and Representations of the Ancient City. Leiden: 229–45.Google Scholar
Piazzi, L. (ed.) (2007) P. Ovidii Nasonis Heroidum Epistula VII Dido Aeneae. Florence.Google Scholar
Piazzi, L. (2013) ‘Latin love elegy and other genres’, in Thorsen 2013: 224–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pillinger, E. (2019) Cassandra and the Poetics of Prophecy in Greek and Latin Literature. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pillinger, H. E. (1969) ‘Some Callimachean influences on Propertius, Book IV’, HSPh 73: 171–99.Google Scholar
Pinotti, P. (1975–6) ‘Alessandrinismo e poikilia stilistica nell’elegia IV 8 di Properzio’, RAIB 64: 127–72. Repr. in Pinotti 2004: 105–51.Google Scholar
Pinotti, P. (1977) ‘Propert. IV 9: Alessandrinismo e arte allusiva’, GIF 29: 50–71. Repr. in Pinotti 2004: 153–74. Trans. A. Talleur, ‘Propertius IV 9: Alexandrianism and allusion’, in Greene & Welch 2012: 116–37.Google Scholar
Pinotti, P. (1983) ‘Properzio e Vertumno: Anticonformismo e restaurazione Augustea’, in Vivona 1983: 75–96. Repr. in Pinotti 2004: 45–66.Google Scholar
Pinotti, P. (2005) ‘Properzio nella storia del genere elegiac latino’, in Santini & Santucci 2005: 207–30.Google Scholar
Platter, C. (1995) ‘Officium in Catullus and Propertius: A Foucauldian reading’, CP 90.3: 211–24.Google Scholar
Poccetti, P. (2012) ‘Properzio e l’Etruria: Tra tradizioni antiquarie e immaginazione’, in Cristofoli, Santini & Santucci 2012: 173–206.Google Scholar
Poliakoff, M. B. (1987) ‘The weapons of love and war: A note on Propertius IV.3’, ICS 12.1: 93–6.Google Scholar
Polt, C. (2017) ‘Furrowing prows: Varro of Atax’s Argonautae and transgressive sailing in Virgil’s Aeneid’, CQ 67.2: 542–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porte, D. (2011) ‘Le “porteur de trophées”: Une lecture octavienne de Properce, Élég. IV, 6 & 10’, Latomus 70.4: 1013–27.Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. (ed.) (2006a) Classical Pasts: The Classical Traditions of Greece and Rome. Princeton, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter, J. I. (2006b) ‘What is “Classical” about Classical Antiquity’, in Porter 2006a: 1–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell Frost, C. (1991) ‘Propertius 3.3.45–46: Don’t go near the water’, AJPh 112.2: 251–9.Google Scholar
Prioux, É. (2011) ‘Callimachus’ queens’, in Acosta-Hughes, Lehnus & Stephens 2011: 201–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pucci, J. (1998) The Full-Knowing Reader: Allusion and the Power of the Reader in the Western Literary Tradition. New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Puelma, M. (1983) ‘Gli Aetia di Callimaco come modello dell’elegia romana d’amore’, A&R 28: 113–32.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. (1965) The Poetry of the Aeneid: Four Studies in Imaginative Unity and Design. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. (1970) Virgil’s Pastoral Art: Studies in the Eclogues. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. (1980) ‘Propertius’ third book: Patterns of cohesion’, Arethusa 13.1: 97–113.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. (1995) Virgil’s Aeneid: Interpretation and Influence. Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. (1998) Virgil’s Epic Designs: Ekphrasis in the Aeneid. New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Putnam, M. C. J. (2000) Horace’s Carmen Saeculare: Ritual Magic and the Poet’s Art. New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Quenemoen, C. K. (2006) ‘The portico of the Danaids: A new reconstruction’, AJA 110.2: 229–50.Google Scholar
Questa, C. (2014) ‘Paratore, Ettore’, Treciani – Dizionario biografico degli Italiani, Vol. 81, www.treccani.it/enciclopedia/ettore-paratore_(Dizionario-Biografico)/ (accessed 15 July 2022).Google Scholar
Quint, D. (1993) Epic and Empire: Politics and Generic Form from Virgil to Milton. Princeton, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quint, D. (2018) Virgil’s Double Cross: Design and Meaning in the Aeneid. Princeton, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabinowitz, N. S. & Richlin, A. (eds.) (1993) Feminist Theory and the Classics. New York.Google Scholar
Racette-Campbell, M. (2016) ‘Death becomes her: Women’s speech haunting Propertian elegy’, Helios 43.2: 109–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramsby, T. R. (2007) Textual Permanence: Roman Elegists and the Epigraphic Tradition. London.Google Scholar
Ramsey, J. T. & Licht, A. L. (1997) The Comet of 44 B.C. and Caesar’s Funeral Games. Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Rawles, R. (2018) Simonides the Poet: Intertextuality and Reception. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rea, J. A. (2007) Legendary Rome: Myth, Monuments and Memory on the Palatine and Capitoline. London.Google Scholar
Reed, J. D. (2007) Virgil’s Gaze: Nation and Poetry in the Aeneid. Princeton, NJ.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, J. D. (2016) ‘Mora in the Aeneid’, in Mitsis, P. & Ziogas, I. (eds.), Wordplay and Powerplay in Latin Poetry (Trends in Classics 36). Berlin: 87–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehm, R. (1994) Marriage to Death: The Conflation of Wedding and Funeral Rituals in Greek Tragedy. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Reiff, A. (1959) Interpretatio, imitatio, aemulatio: Begriff und Vorstellung literarischer Abhängigkeit bei den Römern. Bonn.Google Scholar
Reitzenstein, E. (1936) Wirklichkeitsbild und Gefühlsentwicklung bei Properz (Philologus Suppl. 29.2). Leipzig.Google Scholar
Reitzenstein, E. (1969) ‘Die Cornelia-Elegie des Properz (IV,11): Eine Formuntersuchung und ihre Ergebnisse für die Textkritik’, RhM 112.2: 126–45.Google Scholar
Reitzenstein, E. (1970) Über die Elegie des Propertius auf den Tod der Cornelia. Wiesbaden. Also in AAWM 6: 405–63.Google Scholar
Reitz-Joosse, B. (2021) Building in Words: The Process of Construction in Latin Literature. Oxford.Google Scholar
Rich, J. W. (1998) ‘Augustus’s Parthian honours, the Temple of Mars Ultor and the arch in the Forum Romanum’, PBSR 66: 71–128.Google Scholar
Richmond, O. L. (1918) ‘Towards a reconstruction of the text of Propertius’, CQ 12.2: 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, W. & Senis, G. (1990) ‘Tecnicismi’, Enciclopedia Virgiliana, Vol. 5. Rome: 65–70.Google Scholar
Riesenweber, T. (2007) Uneigentliches Sprechen und Bildermischung in den Elegien des Properz. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, D. H., Dunn, F. M. & Fowler, D. P. (eds.) (1997) Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Robinson, M. (2006) ‘Augustan responses to the Aeneid’, in Clarke, Currie & Lyne 2006: 185–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rochette, B. (2007) ‘Les spolia (opima) dans l’Énéide et la “restauration” du temple de Jupiter Feretrius par Auguste’, in Denooz, J., Dortu, V. & Steinmetz, R. (eds.), Mosaïque. Hommages à Pierre Somville. Liège: 241–55.Google Scholar
Romussi, B. (1940–1) ‘Lo sviluppo di Properzio verso la concezione di una nuova poesia poetica ed etiologica’, Philologus 94.1–4: 175–96.Google Scholar
Romussi, B. (1943) ‘Rapporti tra la poesia erotica del IV libro di Properzio e quella dei libri precedenti’, RFIC 71: 57–65.Google Scholar
Romussi, B. (1952) ‘La realtà familiare e sociale in Properzio come superamento dell’eziologia’, GIF 5: 149–55.Google Scholar
Rosati, G. (2016) ‘Non solo Omero: Il mito Troiano in Properzio’, in Bonamente, Cristofoli & Santini 2016: 51–72.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, D. M. (1981) Oaten Reeds and Trumpets: Pastoral and Epic in Virgil, Spenser, and Milton. Lewisburg, PA.Google Scholar
Rosenmeyer, T. G. (1969) The Green Cabinet: Theocritus and the European Pastoral Lyric. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Ross, D. O. (1975) Backgrounds to Augustan Poetry: Gallus, Elegy, and Rome. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ross, D. O. (1986) ‘Tibullus and the Country’, in Scevola, M. (ed.), Atti del convegno Internazionale di studi su Albio Tibullo (Rome – Palestrina, 10–13 maggio 1984). Rome: 251–65.Google Scholar
Rossi, A. (2004) Contexts of War: Manipulation of Genre in Virgilian Battle Narrative. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Rothstein, M. (ed.) (1920) Die Elegien des Sextus Propertius. Erster Teil: Erstes und Zweites Buch. 2nd edn. Berlin.Google Scholar
Rothstein, M. (ed.) (1924) Die Elegien des Sextus Propertius. Zweiter Teil: Drittes und Viertes Buch. 2nd edn. Berlin.Google Scholar
Rüpke, J. (2016) On Roman Religion: Lived Religion and the Individual in Ancient Rome. Ithaca, NY.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saglio, E. (1887) ‘Cyclas’, Dictionnaire des Antiquités Grecques et Romaines 1.2: 1690–1.Google Scholar
Santini, C. (2004) ‘Properzio e i Fasti di Ovidio: intersezioni mitografiche’, in Santini & Santucci 2004: 149–72.Google Scholar
Santini, C. (2014) ‘Properzio tra scrittura e visualità: Un contributo alla genesi delle immagini in un poeta augusteo’, in Bonamente, Cristofoli & Santini 2014: 349–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santini, C. (2016) ‘Miti di acque e acque trasfigurate in mito nelle elegie di Properzio’, in Bonamente, Cristofoli & Santini 2016: 375–95.Google Scholar
Santini, C. & Santucci, F. (eds.) (2004) Properzio tra storia, arte, mito (Atti del Convegno Internazionale, Assisi, 24–26 maggio 2002). Assisi.Google Scholar
Santini, C. & Santucci, F. (eds.) (2005) Properzio nel genere elegiaco: modelli, motivi, riflessi storici (Atti del convegno internazionale: Assisi, 27–29 maggio 2004). Assisi.Google Scholar
Santini, C. & Santucci, F. (eds.) (2008) I personaggi dell’elegia di Properzio (Atti del convegno internazionale, Assisi, 26–28 maggio 2006). Assisi.Google Scholar
Saunders, T. (2008) Bucolic Ecology: Virgil’s Eclogues and the Environmental Literary Tradition. London.Google Scholar
Schafer, J. K. (2017) ‘Authorial pagination in the Eclogues and Georgics’, TAPhA 147.1: 135–78.Google Scholar
Scheid, J. & Svenbro, J. (2011) ‘Le mythe de Pomone et de Vertumne au livre XIV des Métamorphoses’, Journée de Recherche et d’Agrégation Ovide, Métamorphoses XIV, organisée le 9 mars 2011 par A. Videau, https://claro.hypotheses.org/files/2011/06/M%C3%A9t.XIV-PO-2011-Scheid-Svenbro-Pomone-Vertumne.pdf (accessed 23 August 2022).Google Scholar
Schiesaro, A. (2008) ‘Furthest voices in Virgil’s Dido’, SIFC 6.1: 60–109 & 6.2: 194–245.Google Scholar
Schilling, R. (2002) ‘Il mito e la religione in Properzio messa a punto all’inizio del terzo millenio’, in Catanzaro & Santucci 2002: 229–49.Google Scholar
Schlunk, R. R. (1974) The Homeric Scholia and the Aeneid: A Study of the Influence of Ancient Homeric Literary Criticism on Virgil. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Schmit-Neuerburg, T. (1999) Vergils Aeneis und die antike Homerexegese: Untersuchungen zum Einfluss ethischer und kritischer Homerrezeption auf imitatio und aemulatio Vergils (Untersuchungen zur antiken Literatur und Geschichte 56). Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schrader, J. (2017) Gespräche mit Göttern: Die poetologische Funktion kommunikativer Kultbilder bei Horaz, Tibull und Properz. Stuttgart.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulzki, H. J. (2007) ‘Pertica’, in Cancik, H. & Schneider, H. (eds.), Brill’s New Pauly, Vol. 10. Leiden: 853–4.Google Scholar
Schuster, M. (1930) Tibull-Studien. Beiträge zur Erklärung und Kritik Tibulls und des Corpus Tibullianum. Vienna.Google Scholar
Secci, D. (2013) ‘Hercules, Cacus, and Evander’s myth-making in Aeneid 8’, HSPh 107: 195–227.Google Scholar
Sens, A. (2005) ‘The art of poetry and the poetry of art: The unity and poetics of Posidippus’ statue-poems’, in Gutzwiller 2005: 206–25.Google Scholar
Shackleton Bailey, D. R. (1952–3) ‘Some recent experiments in Propertian criticism’, PCPhS 182: 9–20.Google Scholar
Sharrock, A. R. (2013) ‘The poeta-amator, nequitia, and recusatio’, in Thorsen 2013: 151–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shi, V. S. & Morgan, L. (2015) ‘A tale of two Carthages: History and allusive topography in Virgil’s Libyan Harbor (Aen. 1.159–69)’, TAPhA 145.1: 107–33.Google Scholar
Sistakou, E. (2008) Reconstructing the Epic: Cross-Readings of the Trojan Myth in Hellenistic Poetry (Hellenistica Groningana 14). Leuven.Google Scholar
Skempis, M. (2010a) ‘Kleine Leute’ und grosse Helden in Homers Odyssee und Kallimachos’ Hekale. Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skulsky, S. (1985) “‘Invitus, regina …”: Aeneas and the love of Rome’, AJPh 106: 447–55.Google Scholar
Slings, S. R. (2004) ‘The Hymn to Delos as a partial allegory of Callimachus’ poetry’, in Harder, Regtuit & Wakker 2004: 279–98.Google Scholar
Smith, R. A. (1990) ‘Ov. Met. 10.475: An instance of “meta-allusion”’, Gymnasium 97: 458–60.Google Scholar
Sollertinsky, D. & Sollertinsky, L. (1981) Pages from the Life of Dmitri Shostakovich, trans. G. Hobbs & C. Midgley. London.Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. (1961) ‘Propertius in his literary relations with Tibullus and Vergil’, Philologus 105.1–2: 273–89. German trans. in Eisenhut 1975: 224-46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solodow, J. B. (1986) ‘Raucae, tua cura, palumbes: Study of a poetic word order’, HSPh 90: 129–53.Google Scholar
Sordi, M. (1964) ‘Vergilio e la storia romana del iv sec. a. C.’, Athenaeum 42: 80–100.Google Scholar
Spence, S. (1991) ‘Cinching the text: The Danaids and the end of the Aeneid’, Vergilius 37: 11–19.Google Scholar
Spencer, D. (2001) ‘Propertius, Hercules, and the dynamics of Roman mythic space in Elegy 4.9’, Arethusa 34.3: 259–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, D. (2019) Language and Authority in De Lingua Latina: Varro’s Guide to Being Roman. Madison, WI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spentzou, E. (2003) Readers and Writers in Ovid’s Heroides: Transgressions of Genre and Gender. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spentzou, E. (2018) ‘Propertius’ aberrant itineraries: Fleeting moments in the Eternal City’, in Fitzgerald, W. & Spentzou, E. (eds.), The Production of Space in Latin Literature. Oxford: 23–41.Google Scholar
Squire, M. J. (2014) ‘The ordo of rhetoric and the rhetoric of order’, in Meyer, M. & Elsner, J. (eds.), Art and Rhetoric in Roman Culture. Cambridge: 353–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, M. J. (2015) ‘Ecphrasis: Visual and verbal interactions in ancient Greek and Latin literature’, Oxford Handbooks Online: Topics in Classical Studies (https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935390.013.58, accessed 25 August 2022).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Squire, M. J. (2017) ‘POP art: The optical poetics of Publilius Optatianus Porfyrius’, in Elsner, J. & Hernández Lobato, J. (eds.), The Poetics of Late Latin Literature. Oxford: 26–99.Google Scholar
Stachon, M. (2014) ‘Properz und Vergil: Was sich liebt, das neckt sich!’, WJA 38: 127–44.Google Scholar
Stahl, H.-P. (1985) Propertius: “Love” and “War”. Individual and State under Augustus. Berkeley, CA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stahl, H.-P. (ed.) (1998) Vergil’s Aeneid: Augustan Epic and Political Context. London.Google Scholar
Steenkamp, J. (2019) ‘The singer and his audience: The opening lines of Propertius’ four books’, AClass 62: 151–71.Google Scholar
Stephens, S. (2003) Seeing Double: Intercultural Poetics in Ptolemaic Alexandria. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Stephens, S. (2011) ‘Remapping the Mediterranean: The Argo adventure in Apollonius and Callimachus’, in Obbink, D. & Rutherford, R. (eds.), Culture in Pieces: Essays on Ancient Texts in Honour of Peter Parsons. Oxford: 188–207.Google Scholar
Stok, F. (2010) ‘The Life of Virgil before Donatus’, in Farrell & Putnam 2010: 107–20.Google Scholar
Stok, F. (2012a) ‘Barbari e alterità etnica nelle elegie di Properzio’, in Cristofoli, Santini & Santucci 2012: 155–72.Google Scholar
Stok, F. (2012b) ‘Commenting on Virgil, from Aelius Donatus to Servius’, Dead Sea Discoveries 19.3: 464–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stok, F. (2016) ‘Il mito di Troia resurgens’, in Bonamente, Cristofoli & Santini 2016: 73–91.Google Scholar
Stover, J. (2018) ‘Propertius, Martial and the Monobiblos’. Paper delivered to the SCS Annual Meeting 149 (https://classicalstudies.org/propertius-martial-and-monobiblos, accessed 26 August 2022).Google Scholar
Strazzulla, M. J. (1990) Il principato di Apollo: Mito e propaganda nelle lastre “Campana” dal tempio di Apollo Palatino. Rome.Google Scholar
Strocka, V. M. (2008) ‘Vergil und die Danaiden’, in Strocka, V. M., von Haehling, R., Freund, S. & Vielberg, M. (eds.), Vergil und das antike Epos: Festschrift Hans Jürgen Tschiedel. Stuttgart: 41–66.Google Scholar
Sullivan, J. P. (ed.) (1962) Critical Essays on Roman Literature I: Elegy and Lyric. London.Google Scholar
Sullivan, J. P. (1993) ‘Form opposed: Elegy, epigram, satire’, in Boyle 1993a: 143–61.Google Scholar
Süssenbach, U. (1974) ‘Cyclas’, in Straub, J. (ed.), Bonner Historia-Augusta-Colloquium 1971 (Vol. 11). Bonn: 185–236.Google Scholar
Suzuki, M. (1989) Metamorphoses of Helen: Authority, Difference, and the Epic. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Syed, Y. (2005). Vergil’s Aeneid and the Roman Self: Subject and Nation in Literary Discourse. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Tarrant, R. J. (1997) ‘Aspects of Virgil’s reception in antiquity’, in Martindale 1997a: 56–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrant, R. J. (2002) ‘Ovid and ancient literary history’, in Hardie 2002b: 13–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrant, R. J. (2006) ‘Propertian textual criticism and editing’, in Günther 2006a: 45–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrant, R. J. (2016) Texts, Editors, and Readers: Methods and Problems in Latin Textual Criticism. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrant, R. J. (2019) ‘Aspects of Virgil’s reception in antiquity’, in F. Mac Góráin & C. Martindale 2019: 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tatum, J. (1984) ‘Allusion and interpretation in Aeneid 6.440–76’, AJPh 105.4: 434–52.Google Scholar
Tatum, J. (2000) ‘Aspirations and divagations: The poetics of place in Propertius 2.10’, TAPhA 130: 393–410.Google Scholar
Thalmann, W. G. (2011) Apollonius of Rhodes and the Spaces of Hellenism. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theodorakopoulos, E. (1997) ‘Closure: the book of Virgil’, in Martindale 1997a: 155–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theodorakopoulos, E. (2019) ‘Closure and the book of Virgil’, in Mac Góráin & Martindale 2019: 226–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thibodeau, P. & Haskell, H. (eds.) (2003) Being There Together: Essays in Honor of Michael C. J. Putnam on the Occasion of his Seventieth Birthday. Afton, MN.Google Scholar
Thill, A. (ed.) (1980) L’élégie romaine: Enracinement, themes, diffusion (BFLM 10). Paris.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1982a) Lands and Peoples in Roman Poetry: The Ethnographical Tradition (PCPhS Suppl. Vol. 70). Cambridge.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1983a) ‘Callimachus, the Victoria Berenices and Roman poetry’, CQ 33.1: 92–113. Repr. in Thomas 1999: 68–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1985) ‘From recusatio to commitment: The evolution of the Vergilian Programme’, in Cairns, F., Cairns, S. & Adkin, N. (eds.) (1986), Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar 5: 61–73. Repr. in Thomas 1999: 101–13.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1986) ‘Virgil’s Georgics and the art of reference’, HSPh 90: 171–98. Repr. in Thomas 1999: 114–41.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1992) ‘The old man revisited: Memory, reference and genre in Virg., Georg. 4, 116–48’, MD 29: 35–70. Repr. in Thomas 1999: 173–205.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1993) ‘Callimachus back in Rome’, in Harder, Regtuit & Wakker 1993: 197–215. Repr. in Thomas 1999: 206–28.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1996) ‘Genre through intertextuality: Theocritus to Virgil and Propertius’, in Harder, Regtuit & Wakker 1996: 227–46. Repr. in Thomas 1999: 246–66.Google Scholar
Thomas, R. F. (1999) Reading Virgil and his Texts: Studies in Intertextuality. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Thorsen, T. S. (ed.) (2013) The Cambridge Companion to Latin Love Elegy. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tissol, G. (1997) The Face of Nature: Wit, Narrative, and Cosmic Origins in Ovid’s Metamorphoses. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Torrance, I. (2011) ‘In the footprints of Aeschylus: Recognition, allusion, and metapoetics in Euripides’, AJPh 132.2: 177–204.Google Scholar
Traina, A. (1989) ‘Le traduzioni’, in Cavallo, G., Fedeli, P. & Giardina, A. (eds.), Lo spazio letterario di Roma antica, Vol. 2: La circolazione del testo. Rome: 93–123.Google Scholar
Traina, A. (1996) ‘Optiuo cognomine crescit: Properzio e l’ironia di Orazio (epist. 2.2.99–101)’, Lexis 14: 121–4.Google Scholar
Tränkle, H. (1960) Die Sprachkunst des Properz und die Tradition der lateinischen Dichtersprache. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Tueller, M. A. (2000) ‘Well-read heroes: Quoting the Aetia in Aeneid 8’, HSPh 100: 361–80.Google Scholar
Turpin, J. (1973) ‘Cynthia et le dragon de Lanuvium: Une élégie cryptique (Properce IV,8)’, RÉL 51: 159–71.Google Scholar
Van Sickle, J. (1974–5) ‘Propertius (vates): Augustan ideology, topography, and poetics in Eleg. IV, 1’, DArch 8.1: 116–45.Google Scholar
Van Sickle, J. (1976) ‘Theocritus and the development of the conception of bucolic genre’, Ramus 5.1: 18–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Sickle, J. (1980) ‘The book-roll and some conventions of the poetry book’, Arethusa 13.1: 5–42.Google Scholar
Van Tress, H. (2004) Poetic Memory: Allusion in the poetry of Callimachus and the Metamorphoses of Ovid. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verdière, R. (1964) (ed.) Gratti Cynegeticon libri I quae supersunt, Vol. 1: Texte et traduction. Leiden.Google Scholar
Versnel, H. S. (1970) Triumphus: An Enquiry into the Origin, Development, and Meaning of the Roman Triumph. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vessey, D. W. T. (1986) ‘Pierius menti calor incidit: Statius’ epic style’, ANRW 32.5: 2965–3019.Google Scholar
Veyne, P. (1988) Roman Erotic Elegy: Love, Poetry and the West, trans. D. Pellauer. Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Viparelli Santangelo, V. (1986) L’esametro di Properzio: Rapporti con Callimaco. Naples.Google Scholar
Vivona, S. (ed.) (1983) Colloquium Propertianum (Tertium), Assisi, 29–31 maggio 1981. Atti. (Accademia Properziana del Subasio 3). Assisi.Google Scholar
Vogt-Spira, G. (2008) ‘Gli dei dell’Olimpo nell’elegia di Properzio’, in Santini & Santucci 2008: 423–45.Google Scholar
Volk, K. (2002) The Poetics of Latin Didactic: Lucretius, Vergil, Ovid, Manilius. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (1982) ‘The Golden Age and sin in Augustan ideology’, P&P 95: 19–36.Google Scholar
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (2020) ‘L’arte nella poesia di Properzio’, in Bonamente, Cristofoli & Santini 2020: 375–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallis, J. (2018) Introspection and Engagement in Propertius: A Study of Book 3. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warde Fowler, W. (1918) Aeneas at the Site of Rome: Observations on the Eighth Book of the Aeneid. Oxford.Google Scholar
Warden, J. (1978) ‘Another would-be Amazon: Propertius 4, 4, 71–2’, Hermes 106.1: 177–87.Google Scholar
Warden, J. (1996) ‘The dead and the quick: Structural correspondences and thematic relationships in Propertius 4.7 and 4.8’, Phoenix 50.2: 118–29.Google Scholar
Warner, R. (1972) Thucydides: History of the Peloponnesian War, with an introduction and notes by M. I. Finley, 2nd edn. London.Google Scholar
Waterfield, R. (1988) The Theology of Arithmetic: On the Mystical, Mathematical and Cosmological Symbolism of the First Ten Numbers. Attributed to Iamblichus. Grand Rapids, MI.Google Scholar
Webb, R. H. (2009) Ekphrasis, Imagination and Persuasion in Ancient Rhetorical Theory and Practice. Aldershot.Google Scholar
Weber, C. (1983) ‘Two chronological contradictions in Catullus 64’, TAPhA 113: 263–71.Google Scholar
Weber, G. (1993) Dichtung und höfische Gesellschaft: die Rezeption von Zeitgeschichte am Hof der ersten drei Ptolemäer (Hermes Einzelschriften 62). Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Weeber, K.-W. (1977) Das 4. Properz-Buch. Interpretationen zu seiner Eigenart und seiner Stellung im Gesamtwerk. Bochum.Google Scholar
Weeber, K.-W. (1978) ‘Properz IV 1, 1–70 und das 8. Buch der Aeneis’, Latomus 37.2: 489–506.Google Scholar
Welch, T. S. (2005a) The Elegiac Cityscape: Propertius and the Meaning of Roman Monuments. Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
Welch, T. S. (2005b) ‘Amor versus Roma: Gender and landscape in Propertius 4.4’, in Ancona & Greene 2005: 269–317.Google Scholar
Welch, T. S. (2012) ‘Whose reading of what Propertius?’, in Greene & Welch 2012: 1–27.Google Scholar
West, D. A. (1975–6) ‘Cernere erat: The shield of Aeneas’, PVS 15: 1–6. Repr. in Harrison 1990: 295–304.Google Scholar
West, D. & Woodman, A. J. (eds.) (1979) Creative Imitation and Latin Literature. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, S. M. (1995) ‘Imago mundi: Another view of the creation in Ovid’s Metamorphoses’, AJPh 116.1: 95–121.Google Scholar
Wheeler, S. M. (1999) A Discourse of Wonders: Audience and Performance in Ovid’s Metamorphoses. Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
White, P. (1993) Promised Verse: Poets in the Society of Augustan Rome. Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitton, C. (2015) ‘Grand designs: Unrolling Epistles 2’, in Marchesi, I. (ed.), Pliny the Book-Maker: Betting on Posterity in the Epistles. Oxford: 109–45.Google Scholar
Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. von (1913) Sappho und Simonides: Untersuchungen über griechische Lyriker. Berlin.Google Scholar
Wilhelm, M. (1987) ‘Venus, Diana, Dido and Camilla in the Aeneid’, Vergilius 33: 43–8.Google Scholar
Williams, Gareth (2018) ‘From grave to rave: Reading “reality” in Propertius 4.7 and 4.8’, in Frangoulidis, S. & Harrison, S. J. (eds.), Life, Love and Death in Latin Poetry, Berlin: 51–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. H. C. (2001) Beyond the Rubicon: Romans and Gauls in Republican Italy. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, M. F. (2003) ‘The Sidus Iulium, the divinity of men, and the Golden Age in Virgil’s Aeneid’, LICS 2.1: 1–29.Google Scholar
Williams, M. F. (2006) ‘Propertius on art (Prop. III, 9, 9–16; II, 3, 41–44; II, 6, 27–34; II, 12, 1–12; II, 31): Epigram, Aristotle, and the new Posidippus (P. Mil. Vogl. VIII, 309, Pos. X, 8–XI, 5 Bastianini = 62–70 AB)’, in Deroux, C. (ed.), Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History 13. Brussels: 291–314.Google Scholar
Wilson, Emily (2006) ‘Quantum mutatus ab illo: Moments of change and recognition in Tasso and Milton’, in Clarke, Currie & Lyne 2006: 273–99.Google Scholar
Wimmel, W. (1960) Kallimachos in Rom: Die Nachfolge seines apologetischen Dichtens in der Augusteerzeit. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Wimmel, W. (1961) ‘Tibull II 5 und das elegische Rombild’, in Radke, G. (ed.), Gedenkschrift für G. Rohde. Tübingen: 227–66.Google Scholar
Wimmel, W. (1973) Hirtenkrieg und arkadisches Rom: Reduktionsmedien in Vergils Aeneis. Munich.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, W. K. & Beardsley, M. C. (1954) ‘The intentional fallacy’, in Wimsatt, W. K., Jr. (ed.), The Verbal Icon: Studies in the Meaning of Poetry. Lexington, KY: 3–18.Google Scholar
Winsbury, R. (2009) The Roman Book: Books, Publishing and Performance in Classical Rome. London.Google Scholar
Wiseman, T. P. (1999) ‘The games of Flora’, in Bergmann, B. & Kondoleon, C. (eds.), The Art of Ancient Spectacle. Washington, DC: 194–203.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. (1989) ‘Virgil the historian: Aeneid 8.626–62 and Livy’, in Diggle, Hall & Jocelyn 1989: 132–45.Google Scholar
Woodman, A. J. & West, D. (eds.) (1984) Poetry and Politics in the Age of Augustus. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wyke, M. (1987a) ‘Written women: Propertius’ scripta puella’, JRS 77: 47–61. Repr. in Wyke 2002: 46–77.Google Scholar
Wyke, M. (1987b) ‘The elegiac woman at Rome’, PCPhS 33: 153–78. Repr. in Wyke 2002: 78–114.Google Scholar
Wyke, M. (1989) ‘Mistress and metaphor in Augustan elegy’, Helios 16.1: 25–47. Repr. in Wyke 2002: 11–45; Greene & Welch 2012: 323–54.Google Scholar
Wyke, M. (1992) ‘Augustan Cleopatras: Female power and poetic authority’, in Powell 1992: 98–140. Rev. in Wyke 2002: 195–243.Google Scholar
Wyke, M. (1994) ‘Taking the woman’s part: Engendering Roman love elegy’, Ramus 23.1–2: 110–28. Rev. in Wyke 2002: 155–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xinyue, B. (2018) ‘The Didos of Book Four: Gender, genre, and the Aeneid in Propertius 4.3 and 4.4’, G&R 65.2: 218–41.Google Scholar
Yardley, J. C. (1987) ‘Propertius 4.5, Ovid Amores 1.6 and Roman comedy’, PCPhS 33: 179–89.Google Scholar
Zanker, P. (2014) ‘Il tempio di Apollo Palatino in Properzio e i suoi resti’, in Bonamente, Cristofoli & Santini 2014: 221–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zecchini, G. (2005) ‘Properzio e la storia romana’, in Santini & Santucci 2005: 94–114.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (1983) ‘Re-creating the canon: Augustan poetry and the Alexandrian past’, Critical Inquiry 10: 83–105.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (1989) ‘Romane memento: Justice and judgment in Aeneid 6’, TAPhA 119: 263–84.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (1997) ‘Rome and its traditions’, in Martindale 1997a: 188–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (2018) Critics, Compilers and Commentators: An Introduction to Roman Philology, 200 BCE–800 CE. Oxford.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (2019) ‘Rome and its traditions’, in Mac Góráin & Martindale 2019: 263–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann Damer, E. (2019) In the Flesh: Embodied Identities in Roman Elegy. Madison, WI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziolkowski, J. M. & Putnam, M. C. J. (eds.) (2008) The Virgilian Tradition: The First Fifteen Hundred Years. New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Zwierlein, O. (1999) Die Ovid- und Vergil-Revision in tiberischer Zeit. Band I: Prolegomena. Berlin.Google Scholar