Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T02:54:53.747Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2021

Edited by
Thomas Kjeller Johansen
Thomas Kjeller Johansen
Affiliation:
Universitetet i Oslo
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Productive Knowledge in Ancient Philosophy
The Concept of <I>Technê</I>
 , pp. 283 - 296
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alesse, F. 2000. La Stoa e la Tradizione Socratica. Rome: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Algra, K., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J., and Schofield, M. (eds.) 1999. The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, J. 2001. Inference from Signs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Allen, J. 2010. ‘Pyrrhonism and Medicine’, in The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism, ed. Bett, R.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 232–48.Google Scholar
Allen, J. 2015. ‘Practical and Theoretical Knowledge in Aristotle’, in Bridging the Gap between Aristotle’s Science and Ethics, eds. Henry, D. and Nielsen, K. M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 49–70.Google Scholar
Angeli, A. 1985. ‘L’esattezza scientifica in Epicuro e Filodemo’, Cronache Ercolanesi 15: 63–84.Google Scholar
Angier, T. 2010. Technê in Aristotle’s Ethics: Crafting the Moral Life. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Annas, J. 1981. An Introduction to Plato’s Republic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Annas, J. 1993. The Morality of Happiness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Annas, J. 2011. Intelligent Virtue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Annas, J., and Betegh, G. (eds.) 2016. Cicero’s De Finibus: Philosophical Approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Arnim, H. von (ed.) 1903–1905. Stoicorum veterum fragmenta, 4 vols. Leipzig: B. G. Teubner Verlag.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. 1984. Epicurus’ Scientific Method. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. 1996. ‘Lucretius on the Growth of Ideas’, in Epicureismo greco e romano: Atti del congresso internazionale, vol. 2, eds. Giannantoni, G. and Gigante, M.. Naples: Bibliopolis: 763–72.Google Scholar
Balansard, A. 2001. Technê dans les Dialogue de Platon. St. Augustin: Academia Verlag.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. 1986. ‘Is Rhetoric an Art?’, DARG Newsletter (University of Calgary) 2: 2–22.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. 1988a. ‘Epicurean Signs’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, suppl. vol. 1988: 91–134.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. 1988b. ‘Scepticism and the Arts’, in Method, Medicine and Metaphysics, ed. Hankinson, R. J.. Edmonton: Academic Print and Publishing; reprinted in Barnes, J. 2014. Proof, Knowledge and Scepticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 512–35.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. 1990. The Toils of Scepticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. 2003. Porphyry Introduction. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, J., Brunschwig, J., Burnyeat, M. F., and Schofield, M. (eds.) 1982. Science and Speculation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barney, R. 2006. ‘Socrates’ Refutation of Thrasymachus’, in The Blackwell Guide to Plato’s Republic, ed. Santas, G.. Oxford: Blackwell: 44–62.Google Scholar
Barney, R. 2008a. ‘Aristotle’s Argument for a Human Function’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 34: 293–322.Google Scholar
Barney, R. 2008b. ‘The Carpenter and the Good’, in Pursuing the Good: Ethics and Metaphysics in Plato’s Republic, eds. Cairns, D., Herrmann, F.-G. and Penner, T.. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press: 293–319.Google Scholar
Beardsley, M. C. 1966. Aesthetics from Classical Greece to the Present: A Short History. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Beere, J. 2009. Doing and Being: An Interpretation of Metaphysics Theta. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bénatouïl, T. 2006. Faire usage: La pratique du Stoicisme, Histoire des doctrines de l’Antiquité Classique. Paris : Vrin.Google Scholar
Bénatouïl, T. 2009. ‘Theôria et vie contemplative du stoïcisme au platonisme: Chrysippe, Panétius, Antiochus, Alcinoos’, in The Origins of the Platonic System: Platonisms of the Early Empire and Their Philosophical Contexts, eds. Bonazzi, M. and Opsomer, J.. Louvain: Éditions Peeters; Société des Études Classiques: 3–31.Google Scholar
Bénatouïl, T., and Bonazzi, M. (eds.). 2012. Theoria, Praxis, and the Contemplative Life after Plato and Aristotle. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Bengson, J., and Moffett, M. (eds.) 2011. Knowing How: Essays on Knowledge, Mind, and Action. Oxford: Oxford Universtiy Press.Google Scholar
Betegh, G. 2003. ‘Cosmological Ethics in the Timaeus and Early Stoicism’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 24: 273–302.Google Scholar
Bett, R. 2010. The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bignone, E. 1936. L’Aristotele perduto et la formazione filosofica di Epicuro. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
Blank, D. 1995. ‘Philodemus on the Technicity of Rhetoric’, in Philodemus and Poetry: Poetic Theory and Practice in Lucretius, Philodemus and Horace, ed. Obbink, D.. Oxford: Oxford Univesity Press: 178–88.Google Scholar
Blank, D. 1998. Sextus Empiricus: Against the Grammarians (Adversus Mathematicos I). Clarendon Later Ancient Philosophers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blank, D. 2003. ‘Atomistic Rhetoric in Philodemus’, Cronache Ercolanesi 33: 69–88.Google Scholar
Bolton, R. 2012. ‘The Aristotelian Elenchus’, in The Development of Dialectic from Plato to Aristotle, ed. Fink, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 270–95.Google Scholar
Bolton, R. 2013. ‘Dialectic, Peirastic and Scientific Method in Aristotle’s Sophistical Refutations’, Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy 15: 267–85.Google Scholar
Bolton, R. 2017. ‘The Search for Principles in Aristotle: Posterior Analytics II and Generation of Animals I’, in Aristotle’s Generation of Animals, eds. Falcon, A. and Lefebvre, D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 227–48.Google Scholar
Bolton, R. 2018. ‘Two Conceptions of Practical Skill (Technê) in Aristotle’, in Aristotle – Contemporary Perspectives on His Thought, ed. Sfendoni-Mentzou, D.. Berlin: De Gruyter: 279–96.Google Scholar
Bolton, R. (Forthcoming). ‘Phronesis: Aristotle on Moral Wisdom and Its Origins in Philia’, in Wisdom, Love and Friendship in Ancient Philosophy, eds. Keeling, E. and Sermamoglou-Soulmaidi, G.. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Bonazzi, M., and Helmig, C. (eds.) 2007. Platonic Stoicism – Stoic Platonism: The Dialogue between Platonism and Stoicism in Antiquity. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, B. 1904. A History of Aesthetics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bréhier, É. 1931. Plotin: Ennéades, vol. V. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Brandom, R. B. 2011. Perspectives on Pragmatism: Classical, Recent and Contemporary. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brennan, T. 1996. ‘Reasonable Impressions in Stoicism’, Phronesis 41: 318–34.Google Scholar
Brickhouse, T. C., and Smith, N. D. 1994. Plato’s Socrates. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brisson, L. 1999. ‘Logos et logoi chez Plotin: Leur nature et leur rôle’, Les Cahiers Philosophiques de Strasbourg 8: 87–108.Google Scholar
Broadie, S. 1987. ‘Nature, Craft and Phronesis in Aristotle’, Philosophical Topics 15: 35–50.Google Scholar
Broadie, S. 1991. Ethics with Aristotle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Broadie, S. 2007. ‘Why No Platonistic Ideas of Artefacts?’ in Maieusis: Essays in Ancient Philosophy in Honour of Myles Burnyeat, ed. Scott, D.. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 232–53.Google Scholar
Broadie, S. 2014. Nature and Divinity in Plato’s Timaeus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Broadie, S., and Rowe, C. 2002. Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics. Translation, Introduction and Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, E. 2000. ‘Justice and Compulsion for Plato’s Philosopher-Rulers’, Ancient Philosophy 20: 1–17.Google Scholar
Brown, E. 2009. ‘Socrates in the Stoa’, in A Companion to Socrates, eds. Ahbel-Rappe, S. and Kamtekar, R.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Brown, L. 1993. ‘Understanding the Theaetetus’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 11: 199–224.Google Scholar
Brown, L. 2010. ‘Division and Definition in Plato’s Sophist’, in Definition in Greek Philosophy, ed. Charles, D.. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 151–71.Google Scholar
Brouwer, R. 2014. The Stoic Sage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brunschwig, J. 1986. ‘The Cradle Argument in Epicureanism and Stoicism’, in The Norms of Nature, eds. Schofield, M. and Striker, G.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 113–44.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. 1982. ‘The Origins of Non-Deductive Inference’, in Science and Speculation, eds. Barnes, J., Brunschwig, J., Burnyeat, M. F. and Schofield, M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 193–238.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. 1990. The Theaetetus of Plato. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. F. 2002. ‘Aristotle on Learning to Be Good’, Journal of the History of Philosophy 40: 141–62.Google Scholar
Calabi, F., and Castaldi, S. (eds.) 2012. Immagini delle origini: La nascita della civiltà e della cultura nel pensiero antico. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.Google Scholar
Callard, A. (unpublished). ‘Reasoning about Particulars in Prior Analytics B21’.Google Scholar
Caluori, D. 2015. Plotinus on Soul, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cambiano, G. 1991. Platone e le Tecniche, Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Chadwick, J., and Mann, W. A. 1978. Hippocratic Writings, 2nd ed. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Chandler, C. 2006. Philodemus on Rhetoric Books 1 and 2: Translations and Exegetical Essays, Studies in Classics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Charles, D. 2000. Aristotle on Meaning and Essence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cole, T. 1990. Democritus and the Sources of Greek Anthropology. American Philological Association Monograph Series 25. Atlanta: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. M. 1982. ‘Aristotle on Natural Teleology’, in Language and Logos, eds. Schofield, M. and Nussbaum, M. C.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 197–222.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. M. (ed.) 1997. Plato: Complete Works, Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. M. 1999. ‘Pleasure and Desire in Epicurus’, in Reason and Emotion: Essays on Ancient Moral Psychology, and Ethical Theory, ed. Cooper, J. M.. Princeton: Princeton University Press: 495–514.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. M. 2012. Pursuits of Wisdom, Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corti, L. 2015. ‘Scepticism, Number and Appearances: The ἀριθμητικὴ τέχνη and Sextus’ targets in M I–VI’, Philosophie Antique 15: 123–47.Google Scholar
Crager, A. 2013. ‘The Infinite in Aristotle’s Logical Epistemology’, in Master of Logic Thesis Series, ed. Fernádez, R.. Amsterdam: Institute for Logic, Language and Computation Scientific Publications: 1–80.Google Scholar
Craik, E. 1998. Hippocrates: Places in Man. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cuomo, S. 2007. Technology and Culture in Greek and Roman Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Delattre, D. 2007. Philodème de Gadara: Sur la Musique: Livre IV, 2 vols. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
d’Hoine, P. 2006a. ‘The Status of the Arts: Proclus’ Theory of Artefacts’, Elenchos 27: 305–44.Google Scholar
d’Hoine, P. 2006b. ‘Proclus and Syrianus on Ideas of Artefacts: A Test Case for Neoplatonic Hermeneutics’ in Proklos: Methode, Seelenlehre, Metaphysik, eds. Perkams, M. and Piccione, R. M.. Philosophia Antiqua 98. Leiden: Brill: 279–302.Google Scholar
Diaco, S. 2016. ‘Plato and Lucretius on the Origins and Development of Human Society’, PhD diss., Faculty of Classics, Cambridge University.Google Scholar
Diels, H., and Kranz, W. 1952. Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, 8th ed. Diels: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Dillon, J. 2003. ‘Philip of Opus and the Theology of Plato’s Laws’ in Plato’s Laws: From Theory into Practice, eds. Scolnicov, S. and Brisson, L.. Proceedings of the VI Symposium Platonicum. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag: 304–11.Google Scholar
Dillon, J., and Gergel, T. (eds.) 2003. The Greek Sophists, trans. Dillon, J. and Gergel, T.. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Dodds, E. R. 1973. ‘The Sophistic Movement and the Failure of Greek Liberalism’, in The Ancient Concept of Progress and Other Essays on Greek Literature and Belief, ed. Dodds, E. R.. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 92–105.Google Scholar
Druart, T.-A. 1999. ‘The Timaeus Revisited’, in Plato and Platonism, ed. van Ophuijsen, J. M.. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press: 163–78.Google Scholar
Düring, I. 1957. Aristotle in the Ancient Biographical Tradition. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
Ebert, T. 1987. ‘The Origin of the Stoic Theory of Signs in Sextus Empiricus’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy: 82–126.Google Scholar
Emilsson, E. K. 2007. Plotinus on Intellect, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Emilsson, E. K. 2012. ‘Plotinus and Plato on Soul and Action’, in Plato and the divided self, eds. Barney, R., Brennan, T. and Brittain, C.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 350–67.Google Scholar
Farrar, C. 1988. The Origins of Democratic Thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ferejohn, M. 1984. ‘Socratic Thought-Experiments and the Unity of the Virtue Paradox’, Phronesis 29: 105–22.Google Scholar
Ferrario, M. 1981. ‘La concezione della retorica da Epicuro a Filodemo’, in Proceedings of the XVI International Congress of Papyrology. Chicago: Scholars Press: 145–52.Google Scholar
Frede, M. 1985. Galen: Three Treatises on the Nature of Science. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Frede, M. 1987. ‘Numenius’, in Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 36.2, ed. Haase, W.. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter Verlag: 1034–75.Google Scholar
Frede, M. 1990. ‘An Empiricist View of Knowledge: Memorism’, in Companions to Ancient Thought 1: Epistemology, ed. Everson, S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 225–50.Google Scholar
Frede, M. 1992. ‘Introduction’, in Plato Protagoras, trans. Lombardo, S. and Bell, K.. Indianapolis: Hackett: vii–xxxiii.Google Scholar
Gerson, L. P. 2012. ‘Plotinus on Logos’, Neoplatonism and the Philosophy of Nature, eds. Horn, C. and Wilberding, J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 17–29.Google Scholar
Giannantoni, G., and Gigante, M. (eds.) 1996. Epicureismo greco e romano, 2 vols. Atti del congresso internazionale. Naples: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Gigandet, A. 2003. ‘Les Épicuriens et le problème du paradigme artificialiste’, in Ars et ratio: Sciences, art et métiers dans la philosophie héllenistique, eds. Lévy, C., Besnier, B. and Gigandet, A.. Collection Latomus 273. Brussels: Édition Latomus: 221–30.Google Scholar
Gomperz, T. 1900–1912. Greek Thinkers: A History of Ancient Philosophy, 4 vols, trans. Magnus, L. and Berry, G. G.. London: Murray.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, P. 2009. The Virtue of Aristotle’s Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goulet-Cazé, M.-O. 1986. L’ascèse cynique: un commentaire de Diogène Laërce VI, 70–71. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Gourinat, J.-B. 2001. ‘Le Socrate d’Epictète’, Philosophie antique 1: 137–66.Google Scholar
Gourinat, J.-B. 2008. ‘Le Platon de Panétius: à propos d’un témoignage inédit de Galien’, Philosophie antique 8: 139–51.Google Scholar
Gourinat, J.-B. 2011. ‘Les définitions de l’epistêmê et de la technê dans l’ancient stoïcisme’, in L’Homme et la Science, Actes du XVIe Congrès international et quinquennal de l’Association Guillaume Budé, eds. Jouanna, J., Fartzoff, M. and Bakhouche, B.. Paris: Les Belles Lettres: 242–56.Google Scholar
Grote, G. 1875. Plato and the Other Companions of Socrates, 3rd ed. London. John Murray.Google Scholar
Gulley, N. 1968. The Philosophy of Socrates. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. 1987. ‘Causes and Empiricism: A Problem in the Interpretation of Later Greek Medical Method’, Phronesis 32: 329–48.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. 1995. The Sceptics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hankinson, R. J. 2013. ‘Lucretius, Epicurus, and the Logic of Multiple Explanations’, in Lucretius: Poetry, Philosophy, Science, eds. Lehoux, D., Morrison, A. D. and Sharrock, A.. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 69–97.Google Scholar
Hard, R. (trans.) 2014. Epictetus: Discourses, Fragments, Handbook. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harte, V., McCabe, M. M., Sharples, B., and Sheppard, A. (eds.) 2010. Aristotle and the Stoics Reading Plato. BICS Supplementary, vol. 107. London: Institute of Classical Studies.Google Scholar
Harte, V. (Forthcoming). ‘The Fourfold Classification and Socrates’ Craft Analogy in the Philebus’, in Cambridge Companion to Plato, rev. ed., eds. Kraut, R. and Ebrey, D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hasper, P.-S., and Yurdin, J. 2014. ‘Between Perception and Scientific Knowledge: Aristotle’s Account of Experience’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 47: 119–50.Google Scholar
Heinimann, F. 1961. ‘Eine Vorplatonische Theorie der τέχνη’. Museum Helveticum 18: 105–30.Google Scholar
Helmig, C. 2012. Forms and Concepts: Concept Formation in the Platonic Tradition. Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca et Byzantina, 5. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Henry, D. 2015. ‘Holding for the Most Part: The Demonstrability of Moral Facts’, in Bridging the Gap between Aristotle’s Science and Ethics, eds. Henry, D. and Nielsen, K. M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 169–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, D., and Nielsen, K. M. (eds.) 2015. Bridging the Gap between Aristotle’s Science and Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hicks, R. D. 1925. Diogenes Laertius: Lives of Eminent Philosophers. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Hulme Kozey, E. L. 2019a. ‘Philosophia and Philotechnia: The Technê Theme in the Platonic Dialogues’, PhD diss., Princeton University.Google Scholar
Hulme Kozey, E. L. 2019b. ‘The Good-Directedness of Τέχνη and the Status of Rhetoric in the Platonic Dialogues’, Apeiron 52: 223–44.Google Scholar
Hülser, K. (ed.) 1987. Die fragmente zur Dialektik der Stoiker, vol. 2. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
Hussey, E. 1990. ‘The Beginnings of Epistemology: From Homer to Philolaus’, in Epistemology, ed. Everson, S.. Companions to Ancient Thought 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 11–38.Google Scholar
Hussey, E. 1996. ‘Rescuing Protagoras’, in Essays for David Wiggins: Identity, Truth and Value, eds. Lovibond, S. and Williams, S. G.. Oxford: Blackwell: 185–200.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, D. S. 1988. ‘Doctrines of the Mean and the Debate concerning Skills in Fourth-Century Medicine, Rhetoric, and Ethics’, Apeiron 21: 17–52.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. 2004. ‘Review of Sellars 2003’, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews. https://ndpr.nd.edu/news/the-art-of-living-the-stoics-on-the-nature-and-function-of-philosophy/.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. 2005a. Reading Seneca: Stoic Philosophy at Rome. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. 2005b. ‘Getting to Goodness’, in Reading Seneca: Stoic Philosophy at Rome, ed. Inwood, B.. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 271–301.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. 2017. ‘Stoic Ethics’, in The Cambridge History of Moral Philosophy, eds. Golob, S. and Timmerman, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 75–87.Google Scholar
Irwin, T. 1977. Plato’s Moral Theory: The Early and Middle Dialogues. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Irwin, T. 1995. Plato’s Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Irwin, T. 2000. ‘Ethics As an Inexact Science: Aristotle’s Ambitions for Moral Theory’, in Moral Particularism, eds. Hooker, B. and Little, M. O.. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 100–29.Google Scholar
Isnardi Parente, M. 1966. Techne: Momenti del Pensiero Greco da Platone ad Epicuro. Firenze: Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
Janko, R. 2000. Philodemus on Poems Book One. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johansen, T. K. 2004. Plato’s Natural Philosophy: A Study of the Timaeus-Critias. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johansen, T. K. 2012. The Powers of Aristotle’s Soul. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johansen, T. K. 2014. ‘Why the Cosmos Needs a Craftsman: Plato, Timaeus 27d5–29b1’, Phronesis 59: 297–320.Google Scholar
Johansen, T. K. 2017. ‘Aristotle on the Logos of the Craftsman’, Phronesis 62: 97–135.Google Scholar
Johansen, T. K. 2020. ‘From Craft to Nature: The Emergence of Natural Teleology’, in The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Science, ed. Taub, L.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 102–20.Google Scholar
Jouanna, J. 1990. Hippocrate II 1: De l’Ancienne Médicine (Budé series). Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. 1996. Plato and the Socratic Dialogue: The Philosophical Use of a Literary Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kalligas, P. 2016. ‘Platonic Astronomy and the Development of Ancient Sphairopoiia’, Rhizomata 4: 176–200.Google Scholar
Kamtekar, R. 2006. ‘The Politics of Plato’s Socrates’, in A Companion to Socrates eds. Ahbel-Rappe, S. and Kamtekar, R.. Oxford: Blackwell: 214–27.Google Scholar
Kato, M. 1986. Techne und Philosophie bei Platon. Frankfurt am Main: P. Lang.Google Scholar
Kidd, I. G. 1978. ‘Moral Actions and Rules in Stoic Ethics’, in The Stoics, ed. Rist, J.. Berkeley: University of California Press: 247–58.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, C. 1996. The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, C. 2009. Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kozbelt, A., Beghetto, R. A., and Runco, M. A. 2010. ‘Theories of Creativity’, in The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity, eds. Kaufman, J. C. and Sternberg, R.J., Cambridge University Press: Cambridge: 20–47.Google Scholar
Kraut, R. 1989. Aristotle on the Human Good. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kraut, R. 1991. ‘Return to the Cave: Republic 519–521’ Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 7: 43–62.Google Scholar
Kraut, R. 1992. ‘The Defense of Justice in Plato’s Republic’, in Cambridge Companion to Plato, ed. Kraut, R.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 311–37.Google Scholar
Kube, J. 1969. TEXNH und ARETH: Sophistisches und Platonisches Tugendwissen. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kuisma, O. 2003. Art or Experience: A Study on Plotinus’ Aesthetics. Helsinki: Societas scientiarum fennica.Google Scholar
Laks, A., and Most, G. W. 2016. Early Greek Philosophy, 9 vols. Loeb Series. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Laurenti, R. 1973. Filodemo e il pensiero economico degli Epicurei. Milan: Cisalpino—Goliardica.Google Scholar
Lee, D. (rev. Johansen, T. K.) 2008. Plato: Timaeus and Critias. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Lehoux, D., Morrison, A. D., and Sharrock, A. (eds.) 2013. Lucretius: Poetry, Philosophy, Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lennox, J. 2021. Aristotle on Inquiry. Erotetic Frameworks and Domain Specific Norms. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leone, G. 2000. ‘Epicuro fondatore del Giardino e l’opera sua conservata nei papiri’, Cronache Ercolanesi 30: 21–33.Google Scholar
Löbl, R. 1997. ΤΕΧΝΗ –TECHNE, Untersuchungen zur Bedeutung dieses Worts in der Zeit von Homer bis Aristoteles, Band I: Von Homer bis zu den Sophisten. Würzburg: Königshausen und Neumann.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. 1978. ‘Dialectic and the Stoic Sage’, in The Stoics, ed. Rist, J.. Berkeley: University of California Press: 101–24.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. 1988. ‘Socrates in Hellenistic Philosophy’, Classical Quarterly 38: 150–71.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. 2002. Epictetus: A Stoic and Socratic Guide to Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Long, A. A., and Sedley, D. N. 1987. The Hellenistic Philosophers, 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Long, A. G. (ed.) 2013. Plato and the Stoics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Longo-Aurrichio, F. 1977. Φιλοδήμου Περὶ Ρητορικῆς libros primum et secundum. Naples: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Longo-Aurrichio, F. 1985. ‘Testimonianze della Retorica di Filodemo sulla concezione dell’oratoria nei primi maestri epicurei’, Cronache Ercolanesi 15: 31–61.Google Scholar
Longo-Aurrichio, F. 1988. Ermarco: Frammenti. Naples: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Lovibond, S., and Williams, S. G. (eds.) 1996. Essays for David Wiggins: Identity, Truth and Value. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Maier, J. 2018. ‘Ability, Modality, and Genericity’, Philosophical Studies 175: 411–28.Google Scholar
Makin, S. 2006. Aristotle Metaphysics Book Theta. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. 1978. ‘Zeno of Citium’, Mnemosyne 31: 134–78.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. 1983a. ‘Techne: A New Fragment of Chrysippus’, Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 24: 57–65.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. 1983b. ‘Zeno’s Definition of Geometry in a Fragment of I. Calvenus Taurus’, Phronesis 28: 59–74.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. 1986. ‘Diogenes Laertius on Stoic Philosophy’, Elenchos 7: 295–382.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J., and Runia, D. T. 1997. Aëtiana I. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J., and Runia, D. T. 2009. Aëtiana II. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Marrou, H. I. 1948. Histoire de l’Éducation dans l’Antiquité. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Maucolin, B. 2009. Untersuchungen zur hippokratischen Schrift ‘Über die alte Heilkunst’. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Menn, S. 1995. ‘Physics As a Virtue’, in Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 11, eds. Cleary, J. and Wians, W.. Washington, DC: University Press of America: 1–45.Google Scholar
Michalewski, A. 2014. La puissance de l’intelligible: La théorie plotinienne des Formes au miroir de l’héritage médioplatonicien. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
Mitsis, P. 1988. Epicurus’ Ethical Theory: The Pleasures of Invulnerability. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Moraux, P. 1951. Les Listes Anciennes des Ouvrages d’Aristote. Louvain: Éditions Universitaires.Google Scholar
Morel, P.-M. 2016. ‘Travail et émancipation dans l’épicurisme antique: Prométhée revisité’, Revue Internationale de Philosophie 278: 451–67.Google Scholar
Morison, B. 2011. ‘The Logical Structure of the Sceptic’s Opposition’, in Essays in Memory of Michael Frede, eds. Allen, J., Emilsson, E. and Mann, W.. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 40. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 265–95.Google Scholar
Morison, B. 2014. ‘Sextus Empiricus’, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Zalta, E. N.. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/sextus-empiricus/.Google Scholar
Morison, B. 2019. ‘The Sceptic’s Argumentation’, in Dialectic after Plato and Aristotle, eds. Bénatouïl, T. and Ierodiakonou, K.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 283–319.Google Scholar
Moss, J., 2014. ‘Right Reason in Plato and Aristotle: On the Meaning of logos’, Phronesis 59: 181–230.Google Scholar
Narcy, M. 2015. ‘Cité naturelle et cité juste dans la République de Platon’, Bulletin de la Société Française de Philosophie, séance du 22 novembre 2014: 1–40.Google Scholar
Natali, C. 1995. ‘Oikonomia in Hellenistic Political Thought’, in Justice and Generosity: Studies in Hellenistic Social and Political Philosophy, eds. Laks, A. and Schofield, M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 95–128.Google Scholar
Natali, C. 2008. ‘Aristotle’s Conception of Dunamis and Technê’, in Reading Ancient Texts Volume II: Aristotle and the Neoplatonists, Essays in Honour of Denis O’Brien, eds. Stern-Gillet, S. and Corrigan, K.. Leiden: Brill: 1–21.Google Scholar
Nawar, T. 2013. ‘Knowledge and True Belief at Theaetetus 201a–c’, British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21: 1052–70.Google Scholar
Nawar, T. 2017. ‘Platonic Know-How and Successful Action’, European Journal of Philosophy 25: 944–62.Google Scholar
Nawar, T. 2018. ‘Thrasymachus’ Unerring Skill and the Arguments of Republic I’, Phronesis 63: 359–91.Google Scholar
Nawar, T. (unpublished). ‘Aristotle on Skill and Rational Ability’.Google Scholar
Nehamas, A. 1987. ‘Socratic Intellectualism’, Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium in Ancient Philosophy 2: 275–316.Google Scholar
Nehamas, A. 1998. The Art of Living: Socratic Reflections from Plato to Foucault. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Neschke-Hentschke, A. 2000. ‘Der platonische Timaios als Manifest der platonischen Demiurgie’, in Le Timée de Platon: Contributions à l’histoire de sa réception: Platos Timaios, Beiträge zu seiner Rezeptionsgeschichte, ed. Neschke-Hentschke, A.. Bibliothèque philosophique de Louvain, 53, Éditions de l’Institut Supérieur de Philosophie. Leuven: Peeters: ix–xxvii.Google Scholar
Nicolardi, F. 2018. Filodemo: Il primo libro della Retorica. La Scuola di Epicuro, vol. 19. Naples: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Noble, C. I., and Powers, N. M. 2015. ‘Creation and Divine Providence in Plotinus’, in Causation and Creation in Late Antiquity, eds. Marmodoro, A. and Prince, B. D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 51–70.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 1986. The Fragility of Goodness: Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. 2005. ‘Demiurges in Early Imperial Platonism’, in Gott und die Götter bei Plutarch: Götterbilder – Gottesbilder – Weltbilder, ed. Hirsch-Luipold, R.. Berlin: De Gruyter: 51–99.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. 2006. ‘Drittes Bett, Artefakt-Ideen und die Problematik, die Ideenlehre zu veranschaulichen’, in Metaphysik als Wissenschaft: Festschrift für Klaus Düsing zum 65. Geburtstag, ed. Fonfara, D.. Freiburg: Alber: 73–88.Google Scholar
Opsomer, J. 2017. ‘The Natural World’, in All from One: A Guide to Proclus, eds. d’Hoine, P. and Martijn, M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 139–66.Google Scholar
Panofsky, E. 1939. Studies in Iconology: Humanistic Themes in the Art of the Renaissance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Primavesi, O. 2012. ‘Aristotle, Metaphysics A’, in Aristotle’s Metaphysics Alpha, ed. Steel, C.. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 385–516.Google Scholar
Reeve, C. D. C. 1989. Socrates in the Apology: An Essay on Plato’s Apology of Socrates. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Reeve, C. D. C. (trans.) 2004. Plato: Republic. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Rich, A. N. M. 1960. ‘Plotinus and the Theory of Artistic Imitation’, Mnemosyne, 4th series 13: 233–39.Google Scholar
Rist, J. (ed.) 1978. The Stoics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Robin, L. 1928. De rerum natura: Commentaire exégétique et critique, 3 vols. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Roochnik, D. 1996. Of Art and Wisdom: Plato’s Understanding of Techne, University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Rosetti, L. 1973. ‘“Socratica” in Fedone di Elide’, Studi Urbinati 47: 364–81.Google Scholar
Ross, W. D. 1924. Aristotle’s Metaphysics, a Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. J., and Schofield, M. (eds.) 2000. The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. 1949. The Concept of Mind. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Schaerer, R. 1930. ΕΠΙΣΤΗΜH et ΤΕΧΝΗ: Etude sur les notions de connaissance et d’art d’Homère à Platon. Mâcon: Protat Frères.Google Scholar
Schiefsky, Mark J. 2005. Hippocrates on Ancient Medicine. Studies in Ancient Medicine 28. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Schiller, F. C. S. 1908. Plato or Protagoras? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schniewind, A. 2007 Plotin, Traité 5: I, 9: Introduction, traduction, commentaire et notes. Paris: Les éditions du Cerf.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. 1984. ‘Ariston of Chios and the Unity of Virtue’, Ancient Philosophy 4: 83–95.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. 2013. ‘Cardinal Virtues: A Contested Socratic Inheritance’, in Plato and the Stoics, ed. Long, A. G.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 11–28.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. 1982. ‘On Signs’, in Science and Speculation, eds. Barnes, J., Brunschwig, J., Burnyeat, M. F. and Schofield, M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 239–72.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. 1998. ‘Platonic Causes’, Phronesis 43: 114–32.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. 1998a. ‘The Inferential Foundation for Epicurean Ethics’, in Ethics, ed. Everson, S.. Companions to Ancient Thought 4. Cambridge: Cambridge Unnversity Press: 129–50.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. 1998b. Lucretius and the Transformation of Greek Wisdom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. 1999. ‘The Stoic-Platonist Debate on kathêkonta’, in Topics in Stoic Philosophy, ed. Ierodiakonou, K.. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 128–52.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. 2007. Creationism and Its Critics in Antiquity. Sather Classical Lectures, 66. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Sedley, D. N. 2010. ‘Teleology, Aristotelian and Platonic’, in Being, Nature, and Life in Aristotle, eds. Lennox, J. and Bolton, R.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 5–29.Google Scholar
Sellars, J. 2003. The Art of Living: The Stoics on the Nature and Function of Philosophy. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Sienkiewicz, S. 2019. Five Modes of Scepticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, M. F. 1992. Diogenes of Oinoanda: The Epicurean Inscription. Naples: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Smith, M. F. 2003. Supplement to Diogenes of Oinoanda: The Epicurean Inscription. Naples: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Smith, R. 1997. Aristotle, Topics: Books I and VIII. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, R. 2009. ‘Aristotle’s Theory of Demonstration’, in A Companion to Aristotle, ed. Anagnostopoulos, G.. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Solmsen, F. 1929. Die Entwicklung der Aristotelischen Logik und Rhetorik. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. 2004a. Aristotle on Memory, 2nd ed. London: Duckworth (1st ed. 1972).Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. 2004b. The Philosophy of the Commentators, 200–600 AD: A Sourcebook: Volume 2, Physics. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. 2010. ‘The Ancient Commentators on Concept Formation’, in Interpreting Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics in Antiquity and Beyond, eds. de Haas, F. and Leunissen, M.. Leiden: Brill: 3–26.Google Scholar
Sparshott, F. E. 1978. ‘Zeno on Art: Anatomy of a Definition’, in The Stoics, ed. Rist, J.. Berkeley: University of California Press: 273–90.Google Scholar
Stanley, J. 2011. Know How. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stanley, J., and Williamson, T. 2017. ‘Skill’, Nous 51: 713–26.Google Scholar
Steel, C. 2007–2008. Procli In Platonis Parmenidem Commentaria I-V, 2 vols. Oxford Classical Texts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Striker, G. 1990. ‘Ataraxia: Happiness As Tranquillity’, The Monist 73: 97–110; reprinted in Striker, G. 1996a. Essays on Hellenistic Epistemology and Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 183–95.Google Scholar
Striker, G. 1991. ‘Following Nature: A Study in Stoic Ethics’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 9: 1–73.Google Scholar
Striker, G. 1996a. Essays on Hellenistic Epistemology and Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Striker, G. 1996b. ‘Antipater, or the Art of Living’, in Striker, G. Essays on Hellenistic Epistemology and Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 298–315.Google Scholar
Striker, G. 1996c. ‘Plato’s Socrates and the Stoics’, in Striker, G. Essays on Hellenistic Epistemology and Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 316–24.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. C. W. 1991. Plato Protagoras, rev. ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tepedino Guerra, A. 1991. Polieno. Frammenti, La Scuola di Epicuro 11. Naples: Bibliopolis.Google Scholar
Thorsrud, H. 2009. Ancient Scepticism. Stocksfield: Acumen.Google Scholar
Tieleman, T. 2003. Chrysippus’ On Affections: Reconstruction and Interpretation. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Tieleman, T. 2007a. ‘Onomastic Reference in Seneca: The Case of Plato and the Platonists’, in Platonic Stoicism – Stoic Platonism: The Dialogue between Platonism and Stoicism in Antiquity, eds. Bonazzi, M. and Helmig, C.. Leuven: Leuven University Press: 133–48.Google Scholar
Tieleman, T. 2007b. ‘Panaetius’ Place in the History of Stoicism, with Special Reference to His Moral Psychology’, in Pyrrhonists, Patricians, and Platonizers: Hellenistic Philosophy in the Period 155–86 BC, eds. Ioppolo, A. M. and Sedley, D.. Naples: Bibliopolis: 103–42.Google Scholar
Tsouna, V. 2007. The Ethics of Philodemus. Oxford: Oxford Universtiy Press.Google Scholar
Tsouna, V. 2012. Philodemus on Property Management. Williston: Society of Biblical Literature.Google Scholar
Tsouna, V. 2016. ‘Epicurean Preconceptions’, Phronesis 61: 160–221.Google Scholar
Tsouna, V. 2017. ‘Epicureanism and Hedonism’, in The Cambridge History of Moral Philosophy, eds. Golob, S. and Timmerman, J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 57–74.Google Scholar
Tsouna, V. (Forthcoming). ‘Lucrèce: Les origines et le développement des arts’, Aitia.Google Scholar
van Riel, G. 2013. Plato’s Gods. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Vander Waerdt, P. A. 1988. ‘Hermarchus and the Epicurean Genealogy of Morals’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 118: 87–106.Google Scholar
Vander Waerdt, P. A. (ed.) 1994a. The Socratic Movement. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Vander Waerdt, P. A. 1994b. ‘Zeno’s Republic and the Origins of Natural Law’, in Vander Waerdt, P. A. The Socratic Movement. Ithaca: Cornell University Press: 272–308.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. 1983. ‘The Socratic Elenchus’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 1: 27–58.Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. 1985. ‘Socrates’ Disavowal of Knowledge’, Philosophical Quarterly 35: 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vlastos, G. 1991. Socrates: Ironist and Moral Philosopher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Warren, J. 2002. Epicurus and Democritean Ethics: An Archaeology of Ataraxia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Watson, G. 1994. ‘The Concept of “Phantasia” from the Late Hellenistic Period to Early Neoplatonism’, Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt, II 36 (7): 4765–810.Google Scholar
White, N. 2002. Individual and Conflict in Greek Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wiggins, D. 1996. ‘Reply to Edward Hussey’, in Essays for David Wiggins: Identity, Truth and Value, eds. Lovibond, S. and Williams, S. G.. Oxford: Blackwell: 274–76.Google Scholar
Wilberding, J. 2017. Forms, Souls, and Embryos: Neoplatonists on Human Reproduction, Issues in Ancient Philosophy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Witt, C. 2015. ‘In Defense of the Craft Analogy: Artifacts and Natural Teleology’, in Aristotle’s Physics: A Critical Guide, ed. Leunissen, M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 107–20.Google Scholar
Woodruff, P. 1990. ‘Plato’s Early Theory of Knowledge’, in Companions to Ancient Thought, 1: Epistemology, ed. Everson, S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 60–84.Google Scholar
Woodruff, P. 2010. ‘The Pyrrhonian Modes’, in The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism, ed. Bett, R.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 208–31.Google Scholar
Woods, M. 1986. ‘Intuition and Perception in Aristotle’s Ethics’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 4: 145–66.Google Scholar
Woolf, R. 2004. ‘What Kind of Hedonist Was Epicurus?’, Phronesis 49: 303–22.Google Scholar
Wright, G. H. 1976. ‘Replies’, in Essays on Explanation and Understanding, eds. Manninen, J. and Tuomela, R.. Dordrecht: Reidel: 371–413.Google Scholar
Zedda, S. 2000. ‘How to Build a World Soul: A Practical Guide’, in Reason and Necessity: Essays on Plato’s Timaeus, ed. Wright, M. R.. London: Duckworth: 23–41.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Thomas Kjeller Johansen, Universitetet i Oslo
  • Book: Productive Knowledge in Ancient Philosophy
  • Online publication: 14 January 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108641579.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Thomas Kjeller Johansen, Universitetet i Oslo
  • Book: Productive Knowledge in Ancient Philosophy
  • Online publication: 14 January 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108641579.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Edited by Thomas Kjeller Johansen, Universitetet i Oslo
  • Book: Productive Knowledge in Ancient Philosophy
  • Online publication: 14 January 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108641579.013
Available formats
×