Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T18:49:53.674Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

7 - Process tracing, causal inference, and civil war

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2014

Jason Lyall
Affiliation:
Yale University
Andrew Bennett
Affiliation:
Georgetown University, Washington DC
Jeffrey T. Checkel
Affiliation:
Simon Fraser University, British Columbia
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Process tracing is an invaluable tool in the civil war scholar’s toolkit. Or, rather, it should be, for it provides the ability to move beyond statistical association toward causal inference about why (and how) outcomes are produced in civil war settings. Yet, scholars have too often neglected its use. Instead, great pains have been taken to construct research designs that (at best) are able to identify suggestive correlations between variables, but lack the ability to test the mechanism(s) at work. Qualitative research is not immune to this criticism, either, for process tracing, when properly conducted, establishes a standard for rigor that often goes unmet even in detailed historical cases (see also Evangelista, this volume, Chapter 6). This is an unfortunate state of affairs; without understanding the causal processes that underpin associations, we foreclose opportunities to advance our theories of civil war and contribute to debates about the efficacy of different policies in violent settings.

This chapter emphasizes the practicalities of marrying design-based inference with the strengths of process tracing to improve our ability to build and (especially) test theories about civil war onset and dynamics. Bennett and Checkel’s ten best practices for process tracing (this volume, pp. 20–31) provide a springboard for a discussion of how to identify and conduct rigorous process tracing in settings marked by poor (or no) data, security concerns, and fluid events. The chapter also introduces ideas from the now-burgeoning literature on causal inference to help guide decisions about case selection and evidentiary standards. In particular, the approach advocated here draws on a potential outcomes framework that hinges on the use of counterfactual observations, “elaborate” theory, and qualitative evidence on treatment assignment to facilitate drawing causal inferences about why wars break out and how they are fought (see also Dunning, this volume, Chapter 8, on using process tracing to assess assignment to treatment).

Type
Chapter
Information
Process Tracing
From Metaphor to Analytic Tool
, pp. 186 - 208
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×