Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:10:22.991Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

11 - Prioritarianism and Equality of Opportunity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2022

By
Paolo Brunori ,
Francisco H. G. Ferreira  and
Vito Peragine
Edited by
Matthew D. Adler  and
Ole F. Norheim
Matthew D. Adler
Affiliation:
Duke University, North Carolina
Ole F. Norheim
Affiliation:
Universitetet i Bergen, Norway
Get access

Summary

This chapter asks whether prioritarianism – the view that social welfare orderings should give explicit priority to the worse-off – is consistent with the normative theory of equality of opportunity. We show that there are inherent tensions between some of the axioms underpinning prioritarianism and the principles underlying equality of opportunity; but also that these inconsistencies vanish under plausible adjustments to the domains of two key axioms, namely anonymity and the transfer principle. That is: reconciling prioritarianism and equality of opportunity is possible but allowing room for individual responsibility within prioritarianism requires compromises regarding the nature and scope of both impartiality and inequality aversion. The precise nature of the compromises depends on the specific variant of the theory of equality of opportunity that is adopted, and we define classes of social welfare functions and discuss relevant dominance conditions for six such variants. The conflicts and the paths to reconciliation are illustrated in an application to South Africa between 2008 and 2017, where results suggest broad empirical agreement among the different approaches.

Keywords

prioritarianismwelfarismequality of opportunitystochastic dominancerobust welfare comparisonsSouth Africa
Type
Chapter
Information
Prioritarianism in Practice , pp. 518 - 571
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, M. (2018). “Prioritarianism: Room for Desert?” Utilitas, 30: 172–197.Google Scholar
Adler, M. (2019). Measuring Social Welfare: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Arneson, R. (1989). “Equality of Opportunity for Welfare.” Philosophical Studies, 56: 77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, A.B. (1970). “On the measurement of inequality.” Journal of Economic Theory, 2: 244–263.Google Scholar
Atkinson, A.B. and Bourguignon, F. (1987). “Income Distribution and Differences in Need.” In Feiwel, G. F., ed., Arrow and the Foundation of the Theory of Economic Policy. London: Macmillan, pp. 350–370.Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (1789). An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. London: T. Payne and Son.Google Scholar
Brophy, T., Branson, N., Daniels, R.C., Leibbrandt, M., Mlatsheni, C. and Woolard, I. (2018). National Income Dynamics Study Panel User Manual. Release 2018 Version 1. www.datafirst.uct.ac.zaGoogle Scholar
Brunori, P., Hufe, P. and Mahler, D.. (2018). “The Roots of Inequality: Estimating Inequality of Opportunity from Regression Trees and Random Forests”, Ifo Working Paper, No. 252, Ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, Munich.Google Scholar
Brunori, P., Peragine, V. and Serlenga, L. (2019). “Upward and downward bias when measuring inequality of opportunity.” Social Choice and Welfare, 52: 635–661.Google Scholar
Cohen, G.A. (1989). “On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice.” Ethics, 99: 906–944.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. (1981a). “What is equality? Part 1: Equality of welfare.” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 10: 185–246.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. (1981b). “What is equality? Part 2: Equality of resources.” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 10: 283–345.Google Scholar
Ferreira, F.H.G. and Peragine, V. (2016). “Individual Responsibility and Equality of Opportunity”. In Adler, M. and Fleurbaey, M., eds., Oxford Handbook of Well-Being and Public Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 746–784.Google Scholar
Fleurbaey, M. (1994). “On fair compensation.” Theory and Decision, 36: 277–307.Google Scholar
Fleurbaey, M. (1995). “Three solutions for the compensation problem.” Journal of Economic Theory, 65: 505–521.Google Scholar
Fleurbaey, M. and Peragine, V. (2013). “Ex ante versus ex post equality of opportunity.” Economica, 80: 118–130.Google Scholar
Fleurbaey, M., Peragine, V. and Ramos, X. (2017). “Ex-Post Inequality of Opportunity Comparisons.” Social Choice and Welfare, 49: 577–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hothorn, T., Hornik, K. and Zeileis, A. (2006). “Unbiased recursive partitioning: A conditional inference framework.” Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 15: 651–674.Google Scholar
Parfit, D. (2000). “Equality or Priority?” In Clayton, M. and Williams, A., eds., The Ideal of Equality. Houndmills: Palgrave, pp. 81–125.Google Scholar
Peragine, V. (2004). “Ranking income distributions according to equality of opportunity.” Journal of Economic Inequality, 2: 11–30.Google Scholar
Peragine, V. and Serlenga, L. (2008). “Higher education and equality of opportunity in Italy.” In Bishop, J. and Zheng, B., eds., Research on Economic Inequality, 16: 67–97.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roemer, J. (1993). “A pragmatic theory of responsibility for the egalitarian Planner.” Philosophy & Public Affairs, 10: 146–166.Google Scholar
Roemer, J. (1998). Equality of Opportunity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Saposnik, R. (1981). “Rank-dominance in Income Distributions.” Public Choice, 36: 147–151Google Scholar
Sen, A.K. (1980). “Equality of what?” In McMurrin, S., ed., The Tanner Lectures on Human Values. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, pp. 197–220.Google Scholar
Sen, A.K. (1985). Commodities and Capabilities. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Sen, A.K. (2000). “Social Justice and Distribution of Income.” In Atkinson, A.B. and Bourguignon, F., eds., Handbook of Income Distribution: Vol.1. Amsterdam: North Holland, chapter 1.Google Scholar
Shorrocks, A. (1983). “Ranking Income Distributions.” Economica, 50: 3–17.Google Scholar
Van de Gaer, D. (1993). “Equality of opportunity and investment in human capital.” Ph.D. Dissertation, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×