Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T06:48:58.391Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Section 2 - Pre-procedure Protocols

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2023

Edited by
Markus H. M. Montag  and
Dean E. Morbeck
Markus H. M. Montag
Affiliation:
ilabcomm GmbH, St Augustin, Germany
Dean E. Morbeck
Affiliation:
Kindbody Inc, New York City
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Principles of IVF Laboratory Practice
Laboratory Set-Up, Training and Daily Operation
 , pp. 75 - 104
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Bavister, B. D. Culture of preimplantation embryos: facts and artifacts. Hum Reprod Update 1995; 1(2):91–148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leese, H. J. Metabolic control during preimplantation mammalian development. Hum Reprod Update 1995; 1:63–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Punt–van der Zalm, J. P. E. M., Hendriks, J. C. M., Westphal, J. R., et al. Toxicity testing of human assisted reproduction devices using the mouse embryo assay. Repro Biomed Online 2009; 18(4):529–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lane, M. and Gardner, D. K. Differential regulation of mouse embryo development and viability by amino acids. J Reprod Fertil 1997; 109:153–64.Google ScholarPubMed
Davidson, A., Vermesh, M., Lobo, R. and Paulson, R. Mouse embryo culture as quality control for human in vitro fertilization: the one-cell versus the two-cell model. Fertil Steril 1988; 49:516–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, P. M., Morbeck, D. E., Hudson, S., et al. Peroxides in mineral oil used for in vitro fertilization: defining limits of standard quality control assays. J Assist Reprod Genet 2010; 27:87–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mestres, E., Garcia-Jiménez, M., Faes, L., et al. Parameters of the mouse embryo assay that affect detection of peroxides in mineral oil. Reprod Biomed Online 2019; 39:547–55.Google Scholar
Ainsworth, A. J., Fredrickson, J. R. and Morbeck, D.E. Improved detection of mineral oil toxicity using an extended mouse embryo assay. J Assist Reprod Genet 2017; 34:391–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, L. F., Sundaram, S. G. and Smith, S. The relevance and use of mouse embryo bioassays for quality control in an assisted reproductive technology program. Fertil Steril 1993; 60:559–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morbeck, D.E., Khan, Z., Barnidge, D. R. and Walker, D. L. Washing mineral oil reduces contaminants and embryotoxicity. Fertil Steril 2010; 94:2747–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suzuki, O., Asano, T., Yamamoto, Y., Takano, K. and Koura, M. Development in vitro of preimplantation embryos from 55 mouse strains. Reprod Fertil Dev 1996; 8:975–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khan, Z., Morbeck, D. E., Walker, D. L. et al. Mouse embryos and in vitro stress: does mouse strain matter? Fertil Steril 2010; 94:S58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, D. K., Reed, L., Linck, D., Sheehan, C. and Lane, M. Quality control in human in vitro fertilization. Semin Reprod Med 2005; 23(4):319–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolff, H. S., Fredrickson, J. R., Walker, D. L. and Morbeck, D. E. Advances in quality control: mouse embryo morphokinetics are sensitive markers of in vitro stress. Hum Reprod 2013; 28(7):1776–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Carrell, D. T. and Cartmill, D. A brief review of current and proposed federal government regulation of assisted reproduction laboratories in the United States. J Androl 2002; 23:611–17.Google Scholar
Gorrill, M. J., Rinehart, J. S., Tamhane, A. C. and Gerrity, M. Comparison of the hamster sperm motility assay to the mouse one-cell and two-cell embryo bioassays as quality control tests for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1991; 55(2):345–54.Google Scholar
de Jonge, C. J., Centola, G. M. Reed, M. L., et al. Andrology lab corner: human sperm survival assay as a bioassay for the assisted reproductive technologies laboratory. J Androl 2003; 24:16–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bavister, B. and Andrews, J. C. A rapid sperm motility bioassay procedure for quality control testing of water and culture media. J In Vitro Fertil Embryo Trans 1988; 5(2):67–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rinehart, J. S., Bavister, B. D. and Gerrity, M. Quality control in the in vitro fertilization laboratory: comparison of bioassay systems for water quality. J In Vitro Fertil Embryo Trans 1988; 5(6):335–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davidson, A., Vermesh, M., Lobo, R. A. and Paulson, R. J. Mouse embryo culture as a quality control for human in vitro fertilization: the one-cell versus the two-cell model. Fertil Steril 1988; 49:516–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claasens, O. E., Wehr, J. B. and Harrison, K. L. Optimizing sensitivity of the human sperm motility assay for embryo toxicity testing. Hum Reprod 2000; 15(7):1586–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Critchlow, J. D., Matson, P. L., Newman, M. C., et al. Quality control in an in vitro fertilization laboratory: use of human sperm survival studies. Hum Reprod 1989; 4(5):545–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Wikland, M. and Sjoblom, C. The application of quality systems in ART programs. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2000; 166:3–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brinster, R. L. In vitro cultivation of mammalian ova. Adv Biosci 1969; 4:199–233.Google Scholar
Almeida, P. A. and Bolton, V. N. The effect of temperature fluctuations on the cytoskeletal organization and chromosomal constitution of the human oocyte. Zygote 1995; 3(4):357–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Higdon, H. L., 3rd, Blackhurst, D. W. and Boone, W. R. Incubator managements in an assisted reproductive technology laboratory. Fertil Steril 2008; 89(3):703–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swain, J. E. Optimizing the culture environment in the IVF laboratory: impact of pH and buffer capacity on gamete and embryo quality. Reprod Biomed Online 2010; 21:6–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swain, J. E. and Pool, T. B. New pH-buffering system for media utilized during gamete and embryo manipulations for assisted reproduction. Reprod. Biomed Online 2009; 18:799–810.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koustas, G. and Sjoblom, C. Epigenetic consequences of pH stress in mouse embryos. Hum Reprod 2011; 26:i78.Google Scholar
Fitzharris, G. and Baltz, J. Regulation of intracellular pH during oocyte growth and maturation in mammals. Reproduction 2009; 138:619–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Squirrell, J. M., Lane, M. and Bavister, B. D. Altering intracellular pH disrupts development and cellular organization in preimplantation hamster embryos. Biol Reprod 2001; 64:1845–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Swain, J. E. Is there an optimal pH for culture media used in clinical IVF? Hum Reprod Update 2012; 18(3):333–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quinn, P. and Cooke, S. Equivalency of culture media for human in vitro fertilization formulated to have the same pH under an atmosphere containing 5% or 6% carbon dioxide. Fertil Steril 2004; 81:1502–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Graves, C. N. and Biggers, J. D. Carbon dioxide fixation by mouse embryos prior to implantation. Science 1970; 167:1506–8.Google Scholar
Peng, H., Shi, W., Zhang, W., et al. Better quality and more usable embryos obtained on day 3 cultured in 5% than 20% oxygen: a controlled and randomized study using the sibling oocytes. Reprod Sci 2015; pii:1933719115602761.Google Scholar
Morbeck, D. E. Air quality in the assisted reproduction laboratory: a mini-review. J Assist Reprod Genet 2015; 32(7):1019–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boone, W. R., Johnson, J. E., Locke, A. J., Crane, M. M., 4th and Price, T. M. Control of air quality in an assisted reproductive technology laboratory. Fertil Steril 1999; 71(1):150–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Directive 2003/23/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on setting standards of quality and safety for the donation, procurement, testing, processing, preservation, storage and distribution of human tissues and cells. Official Journal of the European Union, L 102, 7.4.2004, pp. 48–58, available at http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/oj/.Google Scholar

References

Alikani, A., Go, K. J., McCaffrey, C. and McCulloh, D. H. Comprehensive evaluation of contemporary assisted reproduction technology laboratory operations to determine staffing levels that promote patient safety and quality care. Fertil Steril 2014; 102:1350–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Revised guidelines for human embryology and andrology laboratories. Fertil Steril 2008; 90(Suppl. 3):S45–59.Google Scholar
Lundin, K. and Ahlström, A. Quality control and standardization of embryo morphology scoring and viability marker. Reprod Biomed Online 2015; 31(4):459–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, M. P., Morbeck, D. E., Hudson, S. B. A., et al. Peroxides in mineral oil used for in vitro fertilization: defining limits of standards quality control assays. J Assist Reprod. Genet 2010; 27:87–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morbeck, D. E., Khan, Z., Barnidge, D. R. and Walker, D. Washing mineral reduces contaminants and embryotoxicity. Fertil Steril 2010; 94:2747–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×