Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T19:57:02.783Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Evidence II: Experimental results

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2011

Thomas Hoffmann
Affiliation:
Universität Osnabrück
Get access

Summary

As the last chapter has shown, the examination of the Kenyan and British English components of the ICE corpus project already revealed a great number of processing-based as well as variety-specific constraints on preposition placement. Due to the inherent negative data problem of corpus evidence it was necessary, however, to corroborate some of the findings with experimental evidence. It was therefore decided to investigate the following issues in a series of introspection experiments using the Magnitude Estimation method:

  1. (i) the status of pied-piping with that- and Ø-relativizers,

  2. (ii) the status of pied-piping with the wh-words who and whom,

  3. (iii) the alleged ungrammaticality of preposition stranding with certain PP types such as manner and frequency adjuncts,

  4. (iv) the influence of syntactic complexity, and

  5. (v) the acceptability of doubled preposition structures (the place in which I live in), a non-standard phenomenon for which it had only been possible to retrieve tokens from the ICE-EA corpus (cf. section 4.1).

The first experiment investigated issues (i) and (iii) in simple relative clauses (section 5.1), while the second one examined issues (i), (ii), (iv) and (v) in relative clauses of varying syntactic complexity (5.2). Finally, experiment number three focused on (ii), (iii) and (v) but this time tested these factors in interrogative clauses (5.3).

Preposition placement in simple relative clauses

The first experiment design crossed the following factors: preposition placement (two levels: stranded; pied-piped), relativizer (three levels: wh-; that; Ø) and pp type (three levels: prepositional verbs; temporal/locative sentence adjuncts; manner-degree/frequency-duration adjuncts).

Type
Chapter
Information
Preposition Placement in English
A Usage-based Approach
, pp. 175 - 225
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×