Skip to main content Accessibility help
×

Purchasing is currently unavailable on Cambridge Core due to maintenance. We apologise for the inconvenience and are working to restore services.

Hostname: page-component-669899f699-qzcqf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-24T12:06:29.708Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Case 48 - A 35-Year-Old at 40 Weeks with Ruptured Membranes and Arrest of Cervical Dilation at 7 cm for 3 Hours

from Section 6 - Intrapartum/Delivery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2025

Peter F. Schnatz
Affiliation:
The Reading Hospital, Pennsylvania
D. Yvette LaCoursiere
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Christopher M. Morosky
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut School of Medicine
Jonathan Schaffir
Affiliation:
The Ohio State University College of Medicine
Vanessa Torbenson
Affiliation:
Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine
David Chelmow
Affiliation:
Virginia Commonwealth School of Medicine
Get access

Summary

This is a case of a 35-year-old gravida 1 para 0 at 39 weeks’ gestation who experienced a protracted active phase of the first stage of labor. The case reviews traditional definitions (based on the work of Friedman) and current Obstetrical Care Consensus guidelines related to the active phase of the first stage of labor. It includes discussion of the 5 Ps that can affect labor progress and interventions that have been shown to have a positive impact on the active phase. Slow but continued progress in the first stage of labor is not an indication for cesarean. To diagnose arrest of dilation in the active phase, the cervix must be ≥ 6 cm dilated with rupture of membranes and ≥ 4 hours of adequate contractions (≥ 200 MvU) or ≥ 6 hours of inadequate contractions.

Type
Chapter
Information
Pregnancy Complications
A Case-Based Approach
, pp. 146 - 148
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Obstetric Care Consensus No. 1: Safe Prevention of the Primary Cesarean Delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;123:693–711.Google Scholar
Zhang, J, Landy, HJ, Ware Branch, D, et al. Contemporary Patterns of Spontaneous Labor with Normal Neonatal Outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116(6):12811287.Google ScholarPubMed
Ashwal, E, Livne, MY, Benichou, JIC, et al. Contemporary Patterns of Labor in Nulliparous and Multiparous Women [published correction appears in Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223(6):918]. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222(3):267.e1267.e9.Google ScholarPubMed
Friedman, EA, Cohen, WR. The Active Phase of Labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;228(5S):S1037S1049.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 766 Summary: Approaches to Limit Intervention during Labor and Birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2019;133(2):406–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilpatrick, SJ, Garrison, E, Fairbrother, E. Normal Labor and Delivery. In: Gabbe’s Obstetrics: Normal and Problem Pregnancies, 8th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2021, 204225.e4.Google Scholar
Spong, CY, Berghella, V, Wenstrom, KD, Mercer, BM, Saade, GR. Preventing the First Cesarean Delivery: Summary of a Joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal–Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Workshop. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(5):11811193.Google Scholar
Rouse, DJ, Owen, J, Hauth, JC. Active-Phase Labor Arrest: Oxytocin Augmentation for at Least 4 Hours. Obstet Gynecol. 1999;93(3):323328.Google ScholarPubMed
Wood, S, Skiffington, J, Brant, R, et al. The REDUCED Trial: A Cluster Randomized Trial for REDucing the Utilization of CEsarean Delivery for Dystocia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;228(5S):S1095S1103.Google Scholar
Govindappagari, S, Greene, N, Burwick, R, Wong, M, Gregory, K. Maternal and Neonatal Morbidity after 4 and 6 Hours of Protracted Active Labor in Nulliparous Term Pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(1):185193.Google ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×