Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T06:46:08.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - ‘Hey, You, Can I Loan Your Yellow Pencil?’

Young Norwegian EFL Learners’ Metapragmatic Appraisal of Requests

from Part I - Pragmatics in Action

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2022

By
Milica Savić  and
Anders Myrset
Edited by
Nicola Halenko  and
Jiayi Wang
Nicola Halenko
Affiliation:
University of Central Lancashire, Preston
Jiayi Wang
Affiliation:
De Montfort University, Leicester
Get access

Summary

This chapter presents a cross-sectional study exploring the development of young Norwegian EFL learners’ appraisal of requestive behaviour in English and their metapragmatic awareness of the linguistic and contextual features influencing request production and interpretation. The participants were in the third, fifth, and seventh grade of primary school, aged approximately 9, 11, and 13. Through an Emoticon task performed in groups, the learners appraised a selection of requests they themselves had produced, and were subsequently invited to explain their choices. Direct requests were appraised increasingly more positively with age, while the opposite was the case with conventionally indirect ones. Hints proved the most challenging to appraise and discuss due to the discrepancies between their linguistic form and speaker intentions. Metapragmatic discussions revealed a more frequent focus on the linguistic features of requesting in all age groups, with the marker ‘please’ consistently emerging as the origin of positive appraisals. Although contextual features, such as the age of and familiarity with the interlocutor, place and communicative situation, were discussed less commonly on the whole, they appeared more often with older learners, resulting in more nuanced appraisals and suggesting a developing awareness of the interplay between linguistic and contextual features.

Keywords

Norwegian EFL learnersrequestsmetapragmatic awareness
Type
Chapter
Information
Pragmatics in English Language Learning , pp. 114 - 140
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bernicot, J. (1991). French children’s conception of requesting: The development of metapragmatic knowledge. International Journal of Behavioural Development, 14(3), 285–304.Google Scholar
Bernicot, J., Laval, V., & Chaminaud, S. (2007). Nonliteral language forms in children: In what order are they acquired in pragmatics and metapragmatics? Journal of Pragmatics, 39(12), 2115–2132.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G., eds. (1989). Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiba, A. (2017). Investigating young learners’ L2 pragmatic competence in telling uncomfortable truths. In Brooks, G. (ed.), The 2016 PanSIG Journal. Tokyo: JALT, pp. 46–54.Google Scholar
Collins, A., Lockton, E., & Adams, C. (2014). Metapragmatic explication ability in children with typical language development: Development and validation of a novel clinical assessment. Journal of Communication Disorders, 52, 31–43.Google Scholar
Cromdal, J. (1996). Pragmatic skills and awareness in bilinguals: Children’s directives in school contexts. Working Papers on Childhood and the Study of Children, 10, 1–38.Google Scholar
Dittrich, W., Johansen, T., & Kulinskaya, E. (2011). Norms and situational rules of address in English and Norwegian speakers. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(15), 3807–3821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eelen, G. (2001). A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester and Northampton, MA: St. Jerome Publishing.Google Scholar
Fretheim, T. (2005). Politeness in Norway: How can you be polite and sincere? In Hickey, L. & Stewart, M. (eds.), Politeness in Europe. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd, pp. 145–158.Google Scholar
Fukushima, S. (2003). Requests and Culture: Politeness in British English and Japanese, 3rd ed. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Hasselgreen, A. (2005). The new læreplan proposal for English – reading between the lines. Språk og språkundervisning, 2, 7–10.Google Scholar
Ishihara, N., & Chiba, A. (2014). Teacher-based or interactional?: Exploring assessment for children’s pragmatic development. Iranian Journal of Language Testing, 4(1), 84–112.Google Scholar
Kádár, D., & House, J. (2020). Ritual frames: A contrastive pragmatic approach. Pragmatics, 30(1), 142–168.Google Scholar
Kecskes, I. (2014). Intercultural Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Krulatz, A. (2016). Competent non-native users of English? Requestive behaviour of Norwegian EFL teachers. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 15(4), 24–44.Google Scholar
Laval, V. (2003). Idiom comprehension and metapragmatic knowledge in French children. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(5), 723–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C. (2010). An exploratory study of the interlanguage pragmatic comprehension of young learners of English. Pragmatics, 20(3), 343–373.Google Scholar
McConachy, T. (2018). Developing Intercultural Perspectives on Language Use: Exploring Pragmatics and Culture in Foreign Language Learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Myrset, A., & Savić, M. (2021). ‘If an astronaut were on the moon …’: Eliciting metapragmatic data from young L2 learners. Applied Pragmatics, 3(2), 163–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogiermann, E., & Bella, S. (2020). An interlanguage study of request perspective: Evidence from German, Greek, Polish and Russian learners of English. Contrastive Pragmatics, 1(2), 180–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Kane, C. (2008). The development of participatory techniques: Facilitating children’s views about decisions which affect them. In Christensen, P. & James, A. (eds.), Research with Children: Perspectives and Practices, 2nd ed. New York and London: Routledge, pp. 125–155.Google Scholar
Pinter, A., & Zandian, S. (2014). ‘I don’t ever want to leave this room’: Benefits of researching ‘with’ children. ELT Journal, 68(1), 64–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portolés, L. (2015). Multilingualism and Very Young Learners: An Analysis of Pragmatic Awareness and Language Attitudes. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portolés, L., & Safont, P. (2018). Examining authentic and elicited data from a multilingual perspective. The real picture of child requestive behaviour in the L3 classroom. System, 75, 81–92.Google Scholar
Punch, S. (2002). Research with children: The same or different from research with adults? Childhood, 9(3), 321–341.Google Scholar
Røkaas, F. (2000). Potential for misunderstandings: Social interaction between Norwegians and Americans. In Isaksson, M. & Røkaas, F. A. (eds.), Conflicting Values: An Intercultural Challenge. Sandvika: Norwegian School of Management BI, pp. 111–129.Google Scholar
Savić, M. (2015). ‘Can I very please borrow it?’ Request development in young Norwegian EFL learners. Intercultural Pragmatics, 12(4), 443–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savić, M. (2021). Co-constructing metapragmatic understandings: How young EFL learners talk about making requests. The European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL, 10(2), 153–176.Google Scholar
Savić, M., Economidou-Kogetsidis, M., & Myrset, A. (2021). Young Greek Cypriot and Norwegian EFL learners: Pragmalinguistic development in request production. Journal of Pragmatics, 180, 15–34.Google Scholar
Savić, M., & Myrset, A. (2021). ‘But in England they’re certainly very polite, so you mustn’t forget that’: Young EFL learners making sense of pragmatic practices. In McConachy, T. & Liddicoat, A. J. (eds.), Teaching and Learning Second Language Pragmatics for Intercultural Understanding. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 40–59.Google Scholar
Savin-Baden, M., & Major, C. (2013). Qualitative Research: The Essential Guide to Theory and Practice. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stavanger municipality. (2017). Levekår i Stavanger: Geografisk Fordeling – Rapport nr. 7 [Living conditions in Stavanger: Geographical Distribution – Report no. 7], Stavanger: Stavanger Kommune.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, L. C., & Milosky, L. M. (1987). School-age children’s metapragmatic knowledge of requests and responses in the classroom. Topics in Language Disorders, 7(2), 61–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, L. C., Wilkinson, A. C., Spinelli, F., & Chiang, C. P. (1984). Metalinguistic knowledge of pragmatic rules in school-age children. Child Development, 55(6), 2130–2140.Google Scholar
Yates, L. (2010). Pragmatic challenges for second language learners. In Trosborg, A. (ed.), Pragmatics across Languages and Cultures. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 287–308.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×