Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T17:53:53.269Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 August 2018

Silviya Lechner  and
Mervyn Frost
Silviya Lechner
Affiliation:
King's College London
Mervyn Frost
Affiliation:
King's College London
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Practice Theory and International Relations , pp. 222 - 237
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, Emanuel, and Pouliot, Vincent (eds.), International Practices (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel, and Pouliot, Vincent, ‘International Practices: Introduction and Framework’, in Adler, Emanuel and Pouliot, Vincent (eds.), International Practices (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel, and Pouliot, Vincent, ‘International Practices’, International Theory 3 (1) 2011: 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, Emanuel, and Barnett, Michael (eds.), Security Communities (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca (ed.), Bourdieu in International Relations: Rethinking Key Concepts in IR (London: Routledge, 2013).Google Scholar
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca, ‘Introduction’, in Adler-Nissen, Rebecca (ed.), Bourdieu in International Relations: Rethinking Key Concepts in IR (London: Routledge, 2013), pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
Alderson, Kai, and Hurrell, Andrew (eds.), Hedley Bull on International Society (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Graham T., and Beschel, R. P., ‘Can the United States Promote Democracy?’, Political Science Quarterly 107 (1) 1992: 81–98.Google Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth, Value in Ethics and Economics (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Aristotle, , Ethica Nicomachea (Nicomachean Ethics), in The Works of Aristotle, Vol. IX, trans. and ed. Ross, W. D. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1925).Google Scholar
Aristotle, , Metaphysica (Metaphysics), in The Works of Aristotle, Vol. VIII, 2nd ed., ed. Ross, W. D. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1928).Google Scholar
Arrington, Robert L., ‘A Defence of Ethical Relativism’, Metaphilosphy 14 (3/4) 1983: 225–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aumann, Robert J., ‘Game Theory’, in Eatwell, John, Milgate, Murray and Newman, Peter (eds.), The New Palgrave: Game Theory (London: Macmillan, 1989), pp. 1–53.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L., ‘A Plea for Excuses’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 57 1956–1957: 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, J. L., How to Do Things with Words, 2nd ed., ed. Urmson, J. O. and Sbisà, Marina (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1975 [1962]).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelrod, Robert, The Evolution of Cooperation (New York: Basic Books, 1984).Google Scholar
Baldwin, David A., ‘Power and International Relations’, in Carlsnaes, Walter, Risse, Thomas and Simmons, Beth A. (eds.), Handbook of International Relations (London: Sage, 2013), pp. 273–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, G. P., and Hacker, P. M. S., Wittgenstein: Rules, Grammar, and Necessity (Oxford: Blackwell, 1985).Google Scholar
Beitz, Charles R., ‘What Human Rights Mean’, Daedalus 132 (1) 2003: 36–46.Google Scholar
Beitz, Charles R., The Idea of Human Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beitz, Charles R., ‘The Moral Standing of States Revisited’, Ethics & International Affairs 23 (4) 2009: 325–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellamy, Alex J., Responsibility to Protect: The Global Effort to End Mass Atrocities (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Bellamy, Alex J., The Responsibility to Protect: A Defence (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2015).Google Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy, A Fragment of Government, ed. Burns, J. H. and Hart, H. L. A. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998 [1776]).Google Scholar
Bhaskar, Roy, The Possibility of Naturalism (Brighton: Harvester Press, 1979).Google Scholar
Bhaskar, Roy, Scientific Realism and Human Emancipation (London: Verso, 1986).Google Scholar
Boghossian, Paul A., ‘Rules, Meaning and Intention: Discussion’, Philosophical Studies 124 (2) 2005: 185–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, Outline of a Theory of Practice, trans. Nice, Richard (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977 [1972]).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, In Other Words: Essays towards a Reflexive Sociology, trans. Adamson, Matthew (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, The Logic of Practice, trans. Nice, Richard (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1990 [1980]).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1998 [1994]).Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, Pascalian Meditations (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2000 [1997]).Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre, Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, trans. Nice, Richard (London: Routledge, 2010 [1984]).Google Scholar
Brooks, Thom, Hegel’s Political Philosophy: A Systematic Reading of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Brown, Chris, ‘Cosmopolitanism, World Citizenship and Global Civil Society’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 3 (1) 2000: 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Chris, ‘The ‘‘Practice Turn’’, Phronesis and Classical Realism: Towards a Phronetic International Political Theory?’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies 40 (3) 2012: 439–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Chris, International Society, Global Polity: An Introduction to International Political Theory (London: Sage, 2015).Google Scholar
Brown, Garrett W. and Held, David (eds.), The Cosmopolitanism Reader (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Buchwalter, Andrew, ‘Hegel’s Conception of an International “We”’, in Grier, Philip T. (ed.), Identity and Difference: Studies in Hegel’s Logic, Philosophy of Spirit, and Politics (New York: State University of New York Press, 2007), pp. 155–176.Google Scholar
Bueger, Christian, and Gadinger, Frank, International Practice Theory: New Perspectives (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2014).Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley, ‘Society and Anarchy in International Relations’, in Butterfield, Herbert and Wight, Martin (eds.), Diplomatic Investigations: Essays in the Theory of International Politics (London: Allen and Unwin, 1966), pp. 35–50.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley, ‘The Emergence of a Universal International Society’, in Bull, Hedley and Watson, Adam (eds.), The Expansion of International Society (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984), pp. 117–126.Google Scholar
Bull, Hedley, The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics, 3rd ed. (Houndmills: Palgrave, 2002 [1977]).Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry, From International to World Society? English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, Lindsey, and Chetail, Vincent, Privatizing War: Private Military and Security Companies under Public International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf, ‘Testability and Meaning’, Philosophy of Science 3 (4) 1936: 419–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carothers, Thomas, Critical Mission: Essays on Democracy Promotion (Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2004).Google Scholar
Carothers, Thomas, and Ottaway, Marina (eds.), Uncharted Journey: Promoting Democracy in the Middle East (Washington DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2005).Google Scholar
Cohen, Jean L., ‘Whose Sovereignty? Empire versus International Law’, Ethics & International Affairs 18 (3) 2004: 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Donald, Essays on Actions and Events, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Morton D., Game Theory: A Non-technical Introduction (New York: Dover, 1997).Google Scholar
Dean, Kathryn, Joseph, Jonathan, Roberts, John Michael and Wight, Colin, Realism, Philosophy and Social Science (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques, Of Grammatology, corr. ed., trans. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
De Saussure, Ferdinand, Course in General Linguistics, ed. Harris, Roy (London: Bloomsbury, 2013 [1916]).Google Scholar
Dessler, David, ‘What’s at Stake in the Agent-Structure Debate?’, International Organization 43 (3) 1989: 441–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Tocqueville, Alexis, Democracy in America, trans. Reeve, Henry, ed. Kramnick, Isaac (New York: Norton, 2007).Google Scholar
Deutsch, Karl W., et al., Political Community and the North Atlantic Area: International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1957).Google Scholar
De Vattel, Emer The Laws of Nations, ed. Kapossy, B. and Wahtmore, R. (Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 2008 [1758]).Google Scholar
Dilthey, Wilhelm, Introduction to the Human Sciences, Selected Works, Vol. I, ed. Makkreel, Rudolf A. and Rodi, Frithjof (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Donnelly, Jack, ‘The Discourse of Anarchy in IR’, International Theory 7 (3) 2015: 393–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dresher, Melvin, Games of Strategy: Theories and Applications (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1961).Google Scholar
Droysen, Johann G., Grundriss Der Historik (Outline of the Principles of History), trans. Andrews, E. Benjamin as Droysen’s Principles of History (Boston, MA: Ginn, 1893 [1858]).Google Scholar
Dummett, Michael, Origins of Analytical Philosophy, reprint ed. (London: Bloomsbury, 2014 [1993]).Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald, Taking Rights Seriously (London: Duckworth, 1977).Google Scholar
Edkins, Jenny, Poststructuralism & International Relations: Bringing the Political Back In (London: Lynne Rienner, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Gareth, The Responsibility to Protect: Ending Mass Atrocity Crimes Once and for All (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Falk, Richard, ‘The Global Promise of Social Movements: Explorations at the Edge of Time’, Alternatives 12 (2) 1987: 173–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fierke, Karin M., ‘Links across the Abyss: Language and Logic in International Relations’, International Studies Quarterly 46 (3) 2002: 331–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fierke, Karin M., ‘Wittgenstein and International Relations Theory’, in Moore, Cerwyn and Farrands, Chris (eds.), International Relations Theory and Philosophy (New York: Routledge, 2010), pp. 83–94.Google Scholar
Finnis, John, Natural Law and Natural Rights (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Forum on Scientific Realism. Millennium – Journal of International Studies 2007 35 (2): 343–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, Michel, ‘Truth and Power’, in Foucault, Michel, Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews & Other Writings 1972–1977, trans. Gordon, Colin, Marshall, Leo, Mepham, John and Soper, Kate, ed. Gordon, Colin (New York: Vintage Books, 1980), pp. 109–133.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel, Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason, trans. Howard, Richard (New York: Vintage Books, 1988 [1961]).Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel, The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception, trans. Sheridan, Alan M. (London: Routledge, 1989 [1963]).Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, trans. Sheridan, Alan (New York: Vintage Books, 1995 [1975]).Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel, ‘Governmentality’, in Foucault, Michel, The Essential Works of Michel Foucault, 1954–1984, ed. Rabinow, Paul (London: Penguin, 2002), pp. 201–222.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel, ‘Lecture from 14 January 1976’, in Foucault, Michel, Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–1976, trans. Macey, David, ed. Bertani, Mauro and Fontana, Alessandro (New York: Picador, 2003), pp. 23–42.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob, Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik: Eine Logisch Mathematische Untersuchung über den Begriff der Zahl (Breslau: Wilhelm Koebner, 1884).Google Scholar
Frey, R. G., and Morris, Christopher W., ‘Value, Welfare, and Morality’, in Frey, R. G. and Morris, C. W. (eds.), Value, Welfare and Morality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993), pp. 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, Mervyn, Ethics in International Relations: A Constitutive Theory (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, Mervyn, Constituting Global Rights: Global Civil Society and the Society of Democratic States (London: Routledge, 2002).Google Scholar
Frost, Mervyn, Global Ethics: Anarchy, Freedom and International Relations (London: Routledge, 2009).Google Scholar
Frost, Mervyn, and Lechner, Silviya, ‘Two Conceptions of International Practice: Aristotelian Praxis or Wittgensteinian Language-Games’, Review of International Studies 42 (2) 2016: 334–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frost, Mervyn, and Lechner, Silviya, ‘Understanding International Practices from the Internal Point of View’, Journal of International Political Theory 12 (3) 2016: 299–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fukuyama, Francis, The End of History and the Last Man, 20th anniversary ed. (New York: Penguin Books, 2012 [1992]).Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Philosophical Hermeneutics, trans. and ed. Linge, David E. (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold, Studies in Ethnomethodology (Malden, MA: Polity Press, 1967).Google Scholar
Garner, Richard T., and Rosen, Bernard, Moral Philosophy (New York: Macmillan, 1967).Google Scholar
Gauss, Gerald F., ‘Hobbesian-Inspired Liberalism: Public Reason Out of Individual Reason’, in Gauss, Gerald F., Contemporary Theories of Liberalism (London: Sage, 2003), pp. 56–82.Google Scholar
Gauss, Gerald F., On Philosophy, Politics and Economics (Belmond, CA: Wadsworth, 2008).Google Scholar
Gettier, Edmund L., ‘Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?’Analysis 23 (6) 1963: 121–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gintis, Herbert, Game Theory Evolving: A Problem-Centered Introduction to Modeling Strategic Interaction (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Grice, H. P., ‘Meaning’, Philosophical Review 66 (3) 1957: 377–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grotius, Hugo, The Rights of War and Peace, 3 vols., ed. Tuck, R. (Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 2005 [1631]).Google Scholar
Gunnell, John G., ‘Can Social Science Be Just?’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (4) 2009: 595–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunnell, John G., ‘Social Scientific Inquiry and Meta-Theoretical Fantasy: The Case of International Relations’, Review of International Relations 37 (4) 2011: 1447–1469.Google Scholar
Hare, R. M., The Language of Morals (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1952).Google Scholar
Harman, Gilbert, The Nature of Morality: An Introduction to Ethics (New York: Oxford University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Harman, Gilbert, and Thompson, Judith Jarvis, Moral Relativism and Moral Objectivity (Oxford: Blackwell, 1996).Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A., ‘Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals,’ Harvard Law Review 71 (4) 1958: 593–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A., The Concept of Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1961).Google Scholar
H-Diplo/ISSF Roundtable: Review of Vincent Pouliot. International Security in Practice 2 (5) 2011: 1–53. www.h-net.org/~diplo/ISSF.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F., Hegel’s Philosophy of Right, trans. Knox, T. M. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1967 [1821]).Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F., Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. Miller, A. V. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977 [1807]).Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F., Hegel’s Science of Logic, trans. Miller, A. V. (Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press International, 1989 [1812–1816]).Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin, Being and Time, trans. Macquarrie, John and Robinson, Edward (San Francisco, CA: Harper and Row, 1962).Google Scholar
Heisenberg, Werner Karl, ‘Über quantentheoretische Umdeutung kinematischer und mechanischer Beziehungen’, Zeitschrift für Physik 33 (1) 1925: 879–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herz, John H., ‘Idealist Internationalism and the Security Dilemma’, World Politics 2 (2) 1950: 157–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hindriks, Frank, ‘Constitutive Rules, Language and Ontology’, Erkenntnis 71 (2) 2009: 253–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hjorth, Ronnie, ‘Hedley Bull’s Paradox of the Balance of Power: A Philosophical Inquiry’, Review of International Studies 33 (4) 2007: 597–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan, ed. Macpherson, C. B. (London: Penguin, 1968 [1651]).Google Scholar
Hohfeld, W. N., Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1919).Google Scholar
Holzgrefe, J. L., and Keohane, Robert O. (eds.), Humanitarian Intervention: Ethical, Legal, and Political Dilemmas (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Human Rights Watch. ‘World Report 2016: Saudi Arabia’. www.hrw.org/world-report/2016/country-chapters/saudi-arabia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David, A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. Selby-Bigge, L. A. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1888 [1739]).Google Scholar
Hutchinson, Phil, Read, Rupert and Sharrock, Wes, There Is No Such Thing as a Social Science: In Defence of Peter Winch (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008).Google Scholar
Jackson, Peter, ‘Pierre Bourdieu, the “Cultural Turn” and the Practice of International History’, Review of International Studies 34 (1) 2008: 155–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Robert H., Quasi States: Sovereignty, International Relations and the Third World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Jackson, Robert, The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Joseph, Jonathan, ‘In Defence of Critical Realism’, Capital & Class 22 (2) 1998: 73–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, Jonathan, ‘Philosophy in International Relations: A Scientific Realist Approach’, Millennium – Journal of International Studies 35 (2) 2007: 345–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch, in Kant, Immanuel, Political Writings, trans. Nisbet, H. B., ed. Reiss, H. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991 [1795]), pp. 93–130.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Critique of Pure Reason, unified ed., trans. Pluhar, Werner S. (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1996 [1781–1787]).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, The Metaphysics of Morals, ed. Gregor, Mary (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996 [1797]).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, The Doctrine of Right, in Kant, Immanuel, The Metaphysics of Morals, ed. Gregor, Mary (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1996 [1797]), pp. 3–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, ed. Gregor, Mary (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997 [1785]).Google Scholar
Kaplan, Morton A., System and Process in International Politics (New York: Wiley, 1957).Google Scholar
Kasher, Naomi, ‘Deontology and Kant’, Revue Internationale de Philosophie 126 (4) 1978: 551–558.Google Scholar
Kenny, Anthony, Wittgenstein (London: Penguin, 1973).Google Scholar
Kessler, Oliver, and Guillaume, Xavier, ‘Everyday Practices of International Relations: People in Organizations’, Journal of International Relations & Development 15 (1) 2012: 110–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiersey, Nicholas J., (ed.), Foucault and International Relations (London: Routledge, 2011).Google Scholar
Kinsey, Christopher, Corporate Soldiers and International Security: The Rise of Private Military Companies (London: Routledge, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline, ‘Approaching Perpetual Peace: Kant’s Defence of a League of States and His Ideal of a World Federation’, European Journal of Philosophy 12 (3) 2004: 304–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klotz, Audie, ‘Norms Reconstituting Interests: Global Racial Equality and U.S. Sanctions against South Africa’, International Organization 49 (3) 1995: 451–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolodny, Niko and Jay Wallace, R., ‘Promises and Practices Revisited’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 31 (2) 2003: 119–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koskenniemi, Martti, ‘Constitutionalism as Mindset: Reflections on Kantian Themes about International Law and Globalization’, Theoretical Inquiries in Law 8 (1) 2007: 9–36.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich V., Rules, Norms, Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krausz, Michael, and Meiland, Jack W. (eds.), Relativism: Cognitive and Moral (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd ed. (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1996 [1962]).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, David A., Hierarchy in International Relations (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
Lapid, Yosef, ‘The Third Debate: On the Prospects of International Theory in a Post-positivist Era’, International Studies Quarterly 33 (3) 1989: 235–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrenz, Jürgen, ‘Hegel, Recognition and Rights: “Anerkennung” as a Gridline of the Philosophy of Rights’, Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy 3 (2) 2007: 153–169.Google Scholar
Lebow, Richard Ned, The Politics and Ethics of Identity: In Search of Ourselves (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lechner, Silviya, ‘Basic Rights and Global Justice: The Problem of International Coercion’, in Happold, Matthew (ed.), International Law in a Multipolar World (London: Routledge, 2012), pp. 158–178.Google Scholar
Lewis, David, Convention: A Philosophical Study (Oxford: Blackwell, 2002 [1969]), pp. 52–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, John, Second Treatise of Government, ed. Macpherson, C. B. (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1980 [1690]).Google Scholar
Luttwak, Edward N., Turbo Capitalism: Winners and Losers in the Global Economy (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1998).Google Scholar
Lyons, David, ‘The Correlativity of Rights and Duties’, Noûs 4 (1) 1970: 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair, Whose Justice? Which Rationality? (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1988).Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair, After Virtue, 3rd ed. (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2007 [1981]).Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Edward A., The Problem of Scientific Realism (New York: Appleton-Century Crofts, 1972).Google Scholar
Malcolm, Norman, Nothing Is Hidden (Oxford: Blackwell, 1986).Google Scholar
Malcolm, Norman, ‘Wittgenstein on Language and Rules’, Philosophy 64 (247) 1989: 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandel, Robert, Armies without States: The Privatization of Security (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Jane R., ‘Basic Actions and Simple Actions’, American Philosophical Quarterly 9 (1) 1972: 59–69.Google Scholar
Martin, Rex, ‘Human Rights and the Social Recognition Thesis’, Journal of Social Philosophy 44 (1) 2013: 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin-Mazé, Médéric, ‘Returning Struggles to the Practice Turn: How Were Bourdieu and Boltanski Lost in (Some) Translations and What to Do about It?’, International Political Sociology 11 (2) 2017: 203–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, Karl, Early Writings (New York: Vintage Books, 1975).Google Scholar
Mattingly, Garrett, Renaissance Diplomacy (New York: Dover, 1988 [1955]).Google Scholar
Mauss, Marcel, The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies, trans. Halls, W. D. (London: Routledge, 2008 [1950]).Google Scholar
McKinsey, J. C. C., Introduction to the Theory of Games (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1952).Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J., The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (New York: W. W. Norton, 2001).Google Scholar
Melden, A. I., Rights and Persons (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Miller, Alexander, and Wright, Crispin (eds.), Rule-Following and Meaning (Chesham: Acumen, 2002).Google Scholar
Milner, Helen, ‘The Assumption of Anarchy in International Relations Theory: A Critique’, Review of International Studies 17 (1) 1991: 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mungiu-Pippidi, Alina, The Quest for Good Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monten, Jonathan ‘The Roots of the Bush Doctrine: Power, Nationalism and Democracy Promotion in U.S. Strategy’, International Security 29 (4) 2005: 112–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, Patrick M., ‘The Practice of Deterrence’, in Adler, Emanuel and Pouliot, Vincent (eds.), International Practices (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 139–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moulines, Carlos Ulises, ‘Structuralism: The Basic Ideas’, in Balzer, Wolfgang and Moulines, Carlos Ulises (eds.), Structuralist Theory of Science: Focal Issues, New Results (Berlin: De Gruyter, 1996), pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas, The View from Nowhere (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas, ‘The Problem of Global Justice’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 33 (2) 2005: 113–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nardin, Terry, Law, Morality, and the Relations of States (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Nardin, Terry, ‘International Pluralism and the Rule of Law’, Review of International Studies 26 (5) 2000: 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nardin, Terry, The Philosophy of Michael Oakeshott (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Nardin, Terry, ‘The Moral Basis of Humanitarian Intervention’, Ethics & International Affairs 16 (2) 2002: 57–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nardin, Terry, ‘Justice and Coercion’, in Bellamy, Alex J. (ed.), International Society and Its Critics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), pp. 247–264.Google Scholar
Nardin, Terry, ‘Globalization and the Public Realm’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 12 (2) 2009: 297–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nardin, Terry, ‘The Diffusion of Sovereignty’, History of European Ideas 41 (1) 2015: 89–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nardin, Terry, and Williams, Melissa S. (eds.), Humanitarian Intervention: NOMOS XLVII (New York: New York University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Neal, Andrew W., ‘Michel Foucault’, in Edkins, Jenny and Vaughan-Williams, Nick (eds.), Critical Theorists and International Relations (London: Routledge, 2009), pp. 161–170.Google Scholar
Neumann, Iver B., ‘Returning Practice to the Linguistic Turn: The Case of Diplomacy’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies 31 (3) 2002: 627–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nozick, Robert, ‘Coercion’, in Morgenbesser, Sidney, Suppes, Patrick and White, Morton (eds.), Philosophy, Science and Method: Essays in Honour of Ernest Nagel (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1969), pp. 440–472.Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert, Anarchy, State, and Utopia (New York: Basic Books, 1974).Google Scholar
Oakeshott, Michael, Experience and Its Modes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1933).Google Scholar
Oakeshott, Michael, On Human Conduct (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975).Google Scholar
Oakeshott, Michael, ‘The Rule of Law’, in Oakeshott, Michael, On History and Other Essays (Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 1983), pp. 129–178.Google Scholar
Oakeshott, Michael, ‘The Tower of Babel’ (1948), in Oakeshott, Michael, Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays, new expanded ed. (Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 1991 [1962]), pp. 465–487.Google Scholar
Oakeshott, Michael, ‘Rational Conduct’ (1950), in Oakeshott, Michael, Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays, new expanded ed. (Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 1991 [1962]), pp. 99–131.Google Scholar
Oakeshott, Michael, Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays, new ed. (Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Press, 1991 [1962]).Google Scholar
Oakeshott, Michael, ‘Education: The Engagement and Its Frustration’ (1972), in Oakeshott, Michael, The Voice of Liberal Learning (Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, 2001), pp. 62–104.Google Scholar
O’Hear, Anthony, Verstehen and Humane Understanding (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Onuf, Nicholas, World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations (Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Parekh, Bhikhu, ‘The Political Philosophy of Michael Oakeshott’, British Journal of Political Science 9 (4) 1979: 481–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patomäki, Heikki, After International Relations: Critical Realism and the (Re)Construction of World Politics (London: Routledge, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patomäki, Heikki, and Wight, Colin, ‘After Postpositivism? The Promises of Critical Realism’, International Studies Quarterly 44 (2) 2000: 213–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patten, Alan, Hegel’s Idea of Freedom (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Pelczynski, Z. A., (ed.), Hegel’s Political Philosophy: Problems and Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Pelczynski, Z. A., (ed.), The State and Civil Society: Studies in Hegel’s Political Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip, Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Pin-Fat, Véronique, Universality, Ethics and International Relations (London: Routledge, 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plato, , The Republic of Plato, trans. Cornford, Francis MacDonald (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1945).Google Scholar
Plato, , Theaetetus, trans. Levett, M. J., ed. Williams, Bernard (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1992).Google Scholar
Pogge, Thomas, World Poverty and Human Rights: Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms, 2nd ed. (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2008).Google Scholar
Polanyi, Michael, Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-critical Philosophy, rev. ed. (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1962).Google Scholar
Polanyi, Michael, The Tacit Dimension (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 2009 [1966]).Google Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent, ‘“Sobjectivism”: Towards a Constructivist Methodology’, International Studies Quarterly 51 (2) 2007: 359–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent, ‘The Logic of Practicality: A Theory of Practice of Security Communities’, International Organization 62 (2) 2008: 257–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent, International Security in Practice: The Politics of NATO-Russia Diplomacy (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pouliot, Vincent, and Frédéric, Mérand, ‘Bourdieu’s Concepts’, in Adler-Nissen, Rebecca (ed.), Bourdieu in International Relations: Rethinking Key Concepts in IR (London: Routledge, 2013), pp. 24–44.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel, Eight Books on the Laws of Nature and Nations, trans. Oldfather, C. H. and Oldfather, W. A. (Washington, DC: Carnegie Institution, 1964 [1688]).Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel, On the Duty of Man and Citizen according to Natural Law, trans. Silverthorne, Michael, ed. Tully, James (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000 [1673]).Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary, ‘What Is Mathematical Truth?’, in Hilary Putnam, Mathematics, Matter and Method: Philosophical Papers, Vol. I (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1975), pp. 60–78.Google Scholar
Rapoport, Anatol, Two-Person Game Theory: The Essential Ideas (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1966).Google Scholar
Rawls, John, ‘Two Concepts of Rules’, Philosophical Review 64 (1) 1955: 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, John, Political Liberalism, pbk. ed. (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Rawls, John, The Law of Peoples (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph, The Concept of a Legal System: An Introduction to the Theory of Legal System, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970).Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph, Practical Reason and Norms (London: Hutchinson, 1975).Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph, The Practice of Value (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty, The Responsibility to Protect (Ottawa: International Development Research Centre, 2001).Google Scholar
Ringmar, Erik, ‘The Search for Dialogue as a Hindrance to Understanding: Practices as Inter-paradigmatic Research Program’, International Theory 6 (1) 2014: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripstein, Arthur, ‘Authority and Coercion’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 32 (1) 2004: 2–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorty, Richard, Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1980).Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard, (ed.), The Linguistic Turn: Essays in Philosophical Method (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Roundtable: International Relations as a Social Science. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 43 (1) 2014: 328–368.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Justin, The Empire of Civil Society (London: Verso, 1994).Google Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert, ‘Are There Propositions?’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 1930, 30: 91–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert, The Concept of Mind (London: Hutchinson, 1949).Google Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert, ‘Are There Propositions?’, in Gilbert Ryle, Collected Papers, Vol. II (1929–1968) (London: Hutchinson, 1971), pp. 12–38.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M., ‘Practices and Promises’, Philosophy and Public Affairs 19 (3) 1990: 199–226.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M., What We Owe to Each Other (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Schatzki, Theodore R., Social Practices: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Human Activity and the Social (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schatzki, Theodore R., Knorr-Cetina, Karin and von Savigny, Eike (eds.), The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory (London: Routledge, 2001).Google Scholar
Scheffler, Samuel, (ed.), Consequentialism and Its Critics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas, The Strategy of Conflict (New York: Oxford University Press, 1963).Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas, Arms and Influence (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1966).Google Scholar
Schleiermacher, Friedrich, Hermeneutics and Criticism, trans. and ed. Bowie, Andrew (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998 [1838]).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Brian C., The Political Discourse of Anarchy: A Disciplinary History of International Relations (Albany: SUNY Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Schmidtz, David, ‘A Place for Cost-Benefit Analysis’, Noûs 35 (suppl. s1) 2001: 148–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scruton, Roger, Kant (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982).Google Scholar
Searle, John R., ‘How to Derive “Ought” from “Is”’, Philosophical Review 73 (1) 1964: 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R., ‘How to Derive “Ought” from “Is”’, in Foot, Philippa (ed.), Theories of Ethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1967), pp. 101–114.Google Scholar
Searle, John R., Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R., The Construction of Social Reality (New York: Free Press, 1995).Google Scholar
Searle, John R., ‘Consciousness as a Biological Problem’, in Searle, John R., The Mystery of Consciousness (New York: New York Review of Books, 1997), pp. 1–18.Google Scholar
Searle, John R., ‘Social Ontology. Some Basic Principles’, Anthropological Theory (6)1 2006: 12–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sending, Ole Jacob, and Neumann, Iver B., ‘Banking on Power: How Some Practices in an International Organization Anchor Others’, in Adler, Emanuel and Pouliot, Vincent (eds.), International Practices (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 231–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shue, Henry, Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence, and U.S. Foreign Policy, 2nd ed. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996).Google Scholar
Slaughter, Anne-Marie, A New World Order (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004).Google Scholar
Smith, Steve, ‘Positivism and Beyond’, in Smith, Steve, Booth, Ken and Zalewski, Marysia (eds.), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 11–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Steve, Booth, Ken and Zalewski, Marysia (eds.), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stopford, John M., and Strange, Susan with Henley, John S., Rival States, Rival Firms: Competition for World Market Shares (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strange, Susan, States and Markets, 2nd ed. (London: Bloomsbury, 2015 [1988]).Google Scholar
Sumner, L. W., The Moral Foundation of Rights (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989).Google Scholar
Suppe, Frederick, (ed.), The Structure of Scientific Theories, 2nd ed. (Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Swartz, David L., Culture and Power: The Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swartz, David L., Symbolic Power, Politics and Intellectuals: The Political Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles, ‘Interpretation and the Sciences of Man’, The Review of Metaphysics 25 (1) 1971: 3–51.Google Scholar
Thompson, Judith Jarvis, Acts and Other Events (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Thompson, Judith Jarvis, Normativity (Peru, IL: Open Court, 2008).Google Scholar
Tönnies, Ferdinand, Community and Association (Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft) (London: Routledge, 1955 [1887]).Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly 2005 A/60/L.1 (World Summit Outcome), available at www.un.org.Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly 2009 A/63/677 (UN Secretary General’s Report on the Responsibility to Protect), available at www.un.org.Google Scholar
US Department of State. ‘Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2014’. www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/hrrpt/humanrightsreport/#wrapper.Google Scholar
Van Fraassen, Bas C., The Scientific Image (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Neumann, John, and Morgenstern, Oskar, Theory of Games and Economic Behavoir, 60th anniversary commemorative ed. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2007 [1944]).Google Scholar
Wæver, Ole, ‘Still a Discipline after All These Debates?’, in Dunne, Tim, Kurki, Milja and Smith, Steve (eds.), International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press 2010), pp. 297–318.Google Scholar
Walker, R. B. J., ‘Social Movements/World Politics’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies 23 (3) 1994: 669–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waltz, Kenneth N., Theory of International Politics (Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill, 1979).Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael, Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality (New York: Basic Books, 1983).Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael, ‘The Politics of Michel Foucault’, in Hoy, David Couzens (ed.), Foucault: A Critical Reader (London: Basil Blackwell, 1986), pp. 51–68.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael, Interpretation and Social Criticism (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael, Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations, 2nd ed. (New York: Basic Books, 1992).Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael, ‘Equality and Civil Society’, in Chambers, Simone and Kymlicka, Will (eds.), Alternative Conceptions of Civil Society (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002), pp. 34–49.Google Scholar
Warrender, Howard, The Political Philosophy of Hobbes: His Theory of Obligation (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1957).Google Scholar
Watson, Adam, ‘The European International Society and Its Expansion’, in Bull, Hedley and Watson, Adam (eds.), The Expansion of International Society (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984), pp. 13–32.Google Scholar
Watson, Adam, The Evolution of International Society: A Comparative Historical Analysis (London: Routledge, 1992).Google Scholar
Weber, Max, Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, ed. Roth, G. and Wittich, C. (Berkley: University of California Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Wendt, Alexander, ‘The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory’, International Organization 41 (3) 1987: 335–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander, ‘Bridging the Theory/Meta-theory Gap in International Relations’, Review of International Studies 17 (4) 1991: 383–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander, Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander, ‘Scientific Realism and Social Kinds’, in Wendt, Alexander, Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), pp. 47–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wendt, Alexander, ‘“Ideas All the Way Down”: On the Constitution of Power and Interest’, in Wendt, Alexander, Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), pp. 92–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wheeler, Nicholas J., Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiener, Antje, The Invisible Constitution of Politics: Contested Norms and International Encounters (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiener, Antje, ‘Enacting Meaning-in-Use: Qualitative Research on Norms and International Relations’, Review of International Studies 35 (1) 2009: 175–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Robert R., Hegel’s Ethics of Recognition (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Winch, Peter, The Idea of a Social Science and Its Relation to Philosophy (London: Routledge, 1958).Google Scholar
Winch, Peter, ‘Understanding a Primitive Society’, in Winch, Peter, Ethics and Action (London: Routledge, 1972 [1964]), pp. 8–49.Google Scholar
Winch, Peter, ‘Facts and Superfacts’, in Winch, Peter, Trying to Make Sense (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1987), pp. 54–63.Google Scholar
Windelband, Wilhelm, ‘Rectorial Address, Strasbourg, 1894’ (‘Windelband on History and Natural Science’), History and Theory 19 (2) 1980: 169–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Windelband, Wilhelm, and Oakes, Guy, ‘History and Natural Science’, History and Theory 19 (2) 1980: 165–168.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, trans. Ogden, C. K. (London: Routledge 1922).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, trans. Pears, D. F. and McGuinness, B. F. (London: Routledge, 1961 [1921]).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, Philosophical Investigations, 3rd ed., trans. Anscombe, G. E. M. (Oxford: Blackwell 1968 [1953]).Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig, ‘Cause and Effect: Intuitive Awareness’, trans. Winch, Peter, Philosophia 6 (3) and (4) 1976: 409–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolff, Christian, Jus Gentium Methodo Scientifica Pertractatum, trans. Drake, Joseph H. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1934 [1749]).Google Scholar
Wright, Crispin, ‘Wittgenstein on Following a Rule: Five Themes’, unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Zagare, Frank C., Game Theory: Concepts and Applications (Newbury Park, CA: SAGE, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Silviya Lechner, King's College London, Mervyn Frost, King's College London
  • Book: Practice Theory and International Relations
  • Online publication: 10 August 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108645775.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Silviya Lechner, King's College London, Mervyn Frost, King's College London
  • Book: Practice Theory and International Relations
  • Online publication: 10 August 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108645775.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Silviya Lechner, King's College London, Mervyn Frost, King's College London
  • Book: Practice Theory and International Relations
  • Online publication: 10 August 2018
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108645775.008
Available formats
×