Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:06:54.225Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Do Conflicts Make Us Free?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 December 2009

Barbara Guckes
Affiliation:
Associate Professor of Philosophy, University of Constance, Germany
Peter Baumann
Affiliation:
University of Aberdeen
Monika Betzler
Affiliation:
Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen, Germany
Get access

Summary

Sometimes we wonder whether we should act in one way or another; we are unsure whether we should do A or B. In situations such as these, different reasons count in favor of different actions, and in our view the different reasons are so strong that we do not quite know which of these reasons should guide our actions. If this is the case, we are in a practical conflict.

Being in a situation of this type seems to be an exception, and yet, in my view, it is situations such as this that nourish our hope that we can act freely. This is so because in general we believe that in order to be free in the way relevant to responsibility, the agent has to be able to do A or the alternative B in a controlled manner. And since we can act in a controlled manner only if we act in accordance with reasons, this implies that we can act freely only if we can act in one way or another in accordance with reasons. We see below that we cannot perform alternative controlled actions unless we are in a conflict situation. Therefore it would appear that we can act freely only in conflict situations. In the following sections I shall begin by arguing that we cannot be free unless we are in a situation of conflict. I will then discuss whether conflicts really are the pockets of freedom we seek.

Type
Chapter
Information
Practical Conflicts
New Philosophical Essays
, pp. 316 - 333
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anscombe, G. E. M. 1971. Causality and Determinism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Campbell, Charles Arthur. 1967. In Defence of Free Will. London: Allen & Unwin
Clarke, Randolph. 1993. Toward a Credible Agent-Causal Account. In Timothy O'Connor (ed.), Agents, Causes, and Events: Essays on Indeterminism and Free Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 201–11
Clarke, Randolph. 1994. Ability and Responsibility for Omissions. Philosophical Studies 73: 195–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, Daniel. 1978. Brainstorms. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press
Foot, Philippa. 1966. Free Will as Involving Determinism. In Bernard Berofsky (ed.), Free Will and Determinism. New York: Harper & Row, 95–108
Guckes, Barbara. 1998. Anmerkungen zur Gültigkeit des Prinzips alternativer Möglichkeiten und verwandter Prinzipien. Logos 5: 334–54Google Scholar
Guckes, Barbara. 1999. Bemerkungen zu Frankfurts und Dennetts Interpretation von “x hätte anders handeln können.”Zeitschrift für philosophische Forschung 53: 188–213Google Scholar
Guckes, Barbara. 2000. Kontrolle als Bedingung für Verantwortlichkeit. Logos 6: 319–40Google Scholar
Guckes, Barbara. 2001. Willensfreiheit trotz Ermangelung einer Alternative? Harry G. Frankfurts hierarchisches Modell des Wünschens. In Harry Frankfurt, Freiheit und Selbstbestimmung, ed.: Monika Betzler and Barbara Guckes. Berlin: Akademie, 1–17
Guckes, Barbara. 2003. Ist Freiheit eine Illusion? Eine metaphysische Untersuchung. Paderborn: Mentis
Hobbes, Thomas. 1966. The English Works of Thomas Hobbes, ed.: William Molesworth. London: John Bohn 1839; 2nd rpt., Aalen: Scientia 1966, vol. 5
Hume, David. 1975. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, 3rd ed., ed. L. A. Selby-Bigge and Peter H. Nidditch. Oxford: Clarendon
Kane, Robert. 1988. Libertarianism and Rationality Revisited. Southern Journal of Philosophy 26: 441–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kane, Robert. 1989. Two Kinds of Incompatibilism: In Timothy O'Connor (ed.), Agents, Causes, and Events: Essays on Indeterminism and Free Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 115–50
Kane, Robert. 1993. The Ends of Metaphysics. International Philosophical Quarterly 33: 413–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kane, Robert. 1994. Free Will: The Elusive Ideal. Philosophical Studies 75: 25–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kane, Robert. 1995. Acts, Patterns, and Self-Control. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18: 131–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kane, Robert. 1996. The Significance of Free Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press
O'Connor, Timothy. 1993. Indeterminism and Free Agency: Three Recent Views. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53: 499–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, William L. 1995. Two Concepts of Freedom. In Timothy O'Connor (ed.), Agents, Causes, and Events: Essays on Indeterminism and Free Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 151–71
Watson, Gary (ed.). 1982. Free Will. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Wiggins, David. 1973. Towards a Reasonable Libertinarianism. In Ted Honderich (ed.), Essays on Freedom of Action. London: Routledge, 31–61

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Do Conflicts Make Us Free?
    • By Barbara Guckes, Associate Professor of Philosophy, University of Constance, Germany
  • Edited by Peter Baumann, University of Aberdeen, Monika Betzler, Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen, Germany
  • Book: Practical Conflicts
  • Online publication: 02 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616402.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Do Conflicts Make Us Free?
    • By Barbara Guckes, Associate Professor of Philosophy, University of Constance, Germany
  • Edited by Peter Baumann, University of Aberdeen, Monika Betzler, Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen, Germany
  • Book: Practical Conflicts
  • Online publication: 02 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616402.015
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Do Conflicts Make Us Free?
    • By Barbara Guckes, Associate Professor of Philosophy, University of Constance, Germany
  • Edited by Peter Baumann, University of Aberdeen, Monika Betzler, Georg-August-Universität, Göttingen, Germany
  • Book: Practical Conflicts
  • Online publication: 02 December 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511616402.015
Available formats
×