Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-55f67697df-xq6d9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-08T13:30:42.328Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2025

Rodrigo Zarazaga
Rodrigo Zarazaga
Affiliation:
Instituto Universitario CIAS
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Poverty Shaping Politics
Machine Parties and Their Unexpected Challengers
 , pp. 249 - 260
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Agarwala, R. (2013). Informal Labor, Formal Politics, and Dignified Discontent in India. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alianza Cívica. (2006). Observación del Proceso Electoral Federal 2006. Alianza Cívica.Google Scholar
Aparicio, R. (2002). La magnitud de la manipulación del voto en las elecciones federales del año 2000. Perfiles Latinoamericanos, 10(20), 79–99.Google Scholar
Aspinall, E., and Hicken, A. (2020). Guns for Hire and Enduring Machines: Clientelism beyond Parties in Indonesia and the Philippines. Democratization, 27(1), 137–156.Google Scholar
Aspinall, E., Weiss, M. L., Hicken, A., and Hutchcroft, P. D. (2022). Mobilizing for Elections: Patronage and Political Machines in Southeast Asia. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Auerbach, A. M. (2020). Demanding Development: The Politics of Public Goods Provision in India’s Urban Slums. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Auerbach, A. M., and Thachil, T. (2018). How Clients Select Brokers: Competition and Choice in India’s Slums. American Political Science Review, 112(4), 775–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auerbach, A. M., and Thachil, T. (2020). Cultivating Clients: Reputation, Responsiveness, and Ethnic Indifference in India’s Slums. American Journal of Political Science, 64(3), 471–487.Google Scholar
Auerbach, A. M., and Thachil, T. (2023). Migrants and Machine Politics: How India’s Urban Poor Seek Representation and Responsiveness. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Auyero, J. (2000). Poor People’s Politics: Peronist Survival Networks and the Legacy of Evita. Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Auyero, J. (2007). Routine Politics and Violence in Argentina: The Gray Zone of State Power. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Auyero, J., and Berti, M. F. (2015). In Harm’s Way: The Dynamics of Urban Violence. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beltrán, U., and Castro Cornejo, R. (2019). Clientelistic Activation of Mexican Voters: Between Vote Buying and Political Communication. Política y Gobierno, 26(2), 171–204.Google Scholar
Berenschot, W. (2011). Political Fixers and the Rise of Hindu Nationalism in Gujarat, India: Lubricating a Patronage Democracy. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, 34(3), 382–401.Google Scholar
Berenschot, W. (2019). Informal Democratization: Brokers, Access to Public Services and Democratic Accountability in Indonesia and India. Democratization, 26(2), 208–224.Google Scholar
Berenschot, W., and Bagchi, S. (2020). Comparing Brokers in India: Informal Networks and Access to Public Services in Bihar and Gujarat. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 50(3), 457–477.Google Scholar
Bonfiglio, J. I., Rival, J. M., and Rodríguez Espínola, S. S. (2016). Venta de drogas y consumos problemáticos: Una aproximación diagnóstica a las adicciones en jóvenes de barrios vulnerables (Informe N°3, 2016; Serie del Bicentenario 2010–2016). Observatorio de la Deuda Social Argentina. Barómetro del Narcotráfico y las Adicciones en la Argentina. Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina.Google Scholar
Brambor, T., Clark, W. R., and Golder, M. (2006). Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses. Political Analysis, 14(1), 63–82.Google Scholar
Bruhn, K. (2014). Chronicle of a Victory Foretold: Candidates, Parties, and Campaign Strategies in the 2012 Mexican Presidential Election. In Domínguez, J. I., Greene, K. F., Lawson, C. H., and Moreno, A. (Eds.), Mexico’s Evolving Democracy: A Comparative Study of the 2012 Elections (pp. 32–62). Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Caldeira, T. P. (2017). Peripheral Urbanization: Autoconstruction, Transversal Logics, and Politics in Cities of the Global South. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 35(1), 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvo, E. (2019). Down to the Wire: Argentina’s 2015 Campaign. In Lupu, N., Oliveros, V., and Schiumerini, L. (Eds.), Campaigns and Voters in Developing Democracies: Argentina in Comparative Perspective (pp. 53–71). University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Calvo, E., and Escolar, M. (2005). La nueva política de partidos en la Argentina. Crisis política, realineamientos partidarios y reforma electoral. Prometeo.Google Scholar
Calvo, E., and Murillo, M. V. (2004). Who Delivers? Partisan Clients in the Argentine Electoral Market. American Journal of Political Science, 48(4), 742–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvo, E., and Murillo, M. V. (2013). When Parties Meet Voters: Assessing Political Linkages through Partisan Networks and Distributive Expectations in Argentina and Chile. Comparative Political Studies, 46(7), 851–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvo, E., and Murillo, M. V. (2019). Non-policy Politics: Richer Voters, Poorer Voters, and the Diversification of Electoral Strategies. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Camp, E. (2017). Cultivating Effective Brokers: A Party Leader’s Dilemma. British Journal of Political Science, 47(3), 521–543.Google Scholar
Carnes, M. E., & Mares, I. (2014). Coalitional realignment and the adoption of non-contributory social insurance programmes in Latin America. Socio-Economic Review, 12(4), 695–722.Google Scholar
Castro Maravilla, R., and Muñoz Armenta, A. (2022). Lealtad o conveniencia. El caso de las coordinadoras (brokers) de una red clientelar en Tecámac, Estado de México. Revista del Instituto Electoral del Estado de México. Apuntes Electorales, 21(67), 199–234.Google Scholar
Chandra, K. (2004). Why Ethnic Parties Succeed: Patronage and Ethnic Head Counts in India. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chhibber, P. K., and Petrocik, J. R. (1989). The Puzzle of Indian Politics: Social Cleavages and the Indian Party System. British Journal of Political Science, 19(2), 191–210.Google Scholar
Chidambaram, S. (2012). The “Right” Kind of Welfare in South India’s Urban Slums: Seva vs. Patronage and the Success of Hindu Nationalist Organizations. Asian Survey, 52(2), 298–320.Google Scholar
Clerici, P., Cruz, F., and Goyburu, L. (2016). ¿Los hermanos sean unidos? Competitividad en las primarias municipales en la provincia de Buenos Aires. Revista SAAP, 10(2), 279–309.Google Scholar
Clerici, P., Cruz, F., and Goyburu, L. (2020). ¿Fuego amigo? El desgaste de las primarias competitivas en la provincia de Buenos Aires. Revista de Ciencia Política, 40(1), 1–26.Google Scholar
Cohen, A., and Taylor, E. (2000). American Pharaoh: Mayor Richard J. Daley - His Battle for Chicago and the Nation. Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
Collier, R. B., and Collier, D. (1991). Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cornelius, W. A. (1975). Politics and the Migrant Poor in Mexico City. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Cornelius, W. A. (2002). La eficacia de la compra y coacción del voto en las elecciones mexicanas de 2000. Perfiles Latinoamericanos, 10(20), 11–31.Google Scholar
Cornelius, W. A. (2004). Mobilized Voting in the 2000 Elections: The Changing Efficacy of Vote Buying and Coercion in Mexican Electoral Politics. In Domínguez, J. I. and Lawson, C. H. (Eds.), Mexico’s Pivotal Democratic Election: Candidates, Voters, and the Presidential Campaign of 2000. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Cox, G. W., and McCubbins, M. D. (1986). Electoral politics as a redistributive game. The Journal of Politics, 48(2), 370–389.Google Scholar
Cravino, M. C., Fournier, M., Neufeld, M. R., and Soldano, D. (2001). Sociabilidad y micropolítica en un barrio bajo planes. In Andrenacci, L. (org.), Cuestión social y política social en el Gran Buenos Aires (pp. 36–52). Instituto del Conurbano, Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento.Google Scholar
Cravino, M. C. (2016). Desigualdad urbana, inseguridad y vida cotidiana en asentamientos informales del Área Metropolitana de Buenos Aires. Etnografías Contemporáneas, 2(3), 56–83.Google Scholar
Daby, M. (2021). The gender gap in political clientelism: Problem-solving networks and the division of political work in Argentina. Comparative Political Studies, 54(2), 215–244.Google Scholar
De la O, A. L. (2014). How Governmental Corruption Breeds Clientelism. In Domínguez, J. I., Greene, K. F., Lawson, C. H., and Moreno, A. (Eds.), Mexico’s Evolving Democracy. A Comparative Study of the 2012 Elections. Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
De Luca, M., Jones, M. P., and Tula, M. I. (2002). Back rooms or ballot boxes? Candidate nomination in Argentina. Comparative Political Studies, 35(4), 413–436.Google Scholar
Del Tredici, R., González, L., and Zarazaga, R. (2023). Buying stones: Welfare spending and protests in Argentina, 2008–2019. Governance, 36(4), 1185–1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, M. (2015). El orden clandestino. Política, fuerzas de seguridad y mercados ilegales en la Argentina. Katz Editores.Google Scholar
Díaz-Cayeros, A., Estévez, F., and Magaloni, B. (2016). The Political Logic of Poverty Relief. Electoral Strategies and Social Policy in Mexico. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dixit, A., and Londregan, J. (1996). The determinants of success of special interests in redistributive politics. The Journal of Politics, 58(4), 1132–1155.Google Scholar
Domínguez, J. I. (2014). Mexico’s 2012 Presidential Election. Conclusions. In Domínguez, J. I., Greene, K. F., Lawson, C. H., and Moreno, A. (Eds.), Mexico’s Evolving Democracy. A Comparative Study of the 2012 Elections (pp. 252–270). Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Eckstein, H. (1975). Case Studies and Theory in Political Science. In Greenstein, F. I. and Polsby, N. W. (Eds.), Handbook of Political Science. Volume 1. Political Science: Scope and Theory (pp. 94–137). Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC). (2019). Preliminary overview of the economics of Latin America and the Caribbean, 2019 (LC/PUB.2019/25-P).Google Scholar
Elizondo, G., and Zarazaga, R. (2023). El rol de los referentes barriales en la reurbanización de barrios populares. Un análisis a partir de los casos de Rodrigo Bueno y Playón de Chacarita (2016–2020). Revista de Ciencia Política (Santiago), 43 (3), 463–487.Google Scholar
Etchemendy, S. (2020). The politics of popular coalitions: Unions and territorial social movements in post-neoliberal Latin America (2000–15). Journal of Latin American Studies, 52(1), 157–188.Google Scholar
Etchemendy, S., and Collier, R. B. (2007). Down but not out: Union resurgence and segmented neocorporatism in Argentina (2003–2007). Politics & Society, 35(3), 363–401.Google Scholar
Fairfield, T., and Garay, C. (2017). Redistribution under the right in Latin America: Electoral competition and organized actors in policymaking. Comparative Political Studies, 50(14), 1871–1906.Google Scholar
Finan, F., and Schechter, L. A. (2012). Vote-buying and reciprocity. Econometrica, 80(2), 863–881.Google Scholar
Fischer, B. (2014). Introduction. In Fischer, B., McCann, B., and Auyero, J. (Eds.), Cities from Scratch: Poverty and Informality in Urban Latin America (pp. 1–7). Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Flom, H. (2022). The Informal Regulation of Criminal Markets in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gallo, A. (2015). Impacto de las nuevas normativas electorales en Argentina: Discusión y análisis de la Ley de Reforma Política 26.571. Temas y Debates, 29, 117–145.Google Scholar
Gallo, A., and Bartoletti, J. (2012). Partidos de gobierno en la era posneoliberal: Paradigmas antagónicos y límites para una agenda de izquierda en América del Sur. Los casos del Frente Amplio, Alianza País y el Frente para la Victoria. Revista Elecciones, 11(12), 35–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galván, F. G. (2011). ¿El sello importa? El rol partidario de los ejecutivos nacionales y provinciales a la luz de las listas peronistas disidentes (1989–2009). POSTData, 16(1), 63–84.Google Scholar
Gans-Morse, J., Mazzuca, S., and Nichter, S. (2014). Varieties of clientelism: Machine politics during elections. American Journal of Political Science, 58(2), 415–432.Google Scholar
Garay, C. (2007). Social policy and collective action: Unemployed workers, community associations, and protest in Argentina. Politics & Society, 35(2), 301–328.Google Scholar
Garay, C. (2016). Social Policy Expansion in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Garay, C., Palmer-Rubin, B., and Poertner, M. (2020). Organizational and partisan brokerage of social benefits: Social policy linkages in Mexico. World Development, 136, 105103.Google Scholar
Gibson, E. L. (1992). Conservative Electoral Movements and Democratic Politics: Core Constituencies, Coalition-Building, and the Latin American Electoral Right. In Chalmers, D. A., De Souza, M. do C. C., and Borón, A. A. (Eds.), The Right and Democracy in Latin America (pp. 13–42). Praeger-Greenwood.Google Scholar
Gibson, E. L., and Calvo, E. (2000). Federalism and low-maintenance constituencies: Territorial dimensions of economic reform in Argentina. Studies in Comparative International Development, 35(3), 32–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González Hernández, J. R., and González Hernández, G. M. (2011). Entre autonomía y clientelismo: Clubes de migrantes zacatecanos. Desacatos, 36, 85–106.Google Scholar
González-Ocantos, E. A., Kiewiet de Jonge, C. P., Meléndez, C., Osorio, J., and Nickerson, D. W. (2012). Vote buying and social desirability bias: Experimental evidence from Nicaragua. American Journal of Political Science, 56(1), 202–217.Google Scholar
González-Ocantos, E., and Oliveros, V. (2019). Clientelism in Latin American Politics. In G. Prevost and H. Vanden (Eds.), The Oxford Encyclopedia of Latin American Politics. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Greene, K. F. (2007). Why Dominant Parties Lose. Mexico’s Democratization in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Greene, K. F. (2022). Money can’t buy you love: Partisan responses to vote-buying offers. American Journal of Political Science, 0(0), 1–17.Google Scholar
Hagene, T. (2015). Political clientelism in Mexico: Bridging the gap between citizens and the state. Latin American Politics and Society, 57(1), 139–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagene, T., and González-Fuente, Í. (2016). Deep politics: Community adaptations to political clientelism in twenty-first-century Mexico. Latin American Research Review, 51(2), 3–23.Google Scholar
Hernández, D., and Anauati, M. V. (2024). Monitor de barrios populares: Informe. CIAS-FUNDAR.Google Scholar
Hicken, A., Aspinall, E., Weiss, M. L., and Muhtadi, B. (2022). Buying Brokers: Electoral handouts beyond clientelism in a weak-party state. World Politics, 74 (1), 77–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, A. C., and Hummel, C. (2022). Informalities: An index approach to informal work and its consequences. Latin American Politics and Society, 64(2), 1–20.Google Scholar
Holland, A. C., and Palmer-Rubin, B. (2015). Beyond the machine: Clientelist brokers and interest organizations in Latin America. Comparative Political Studies, 48(9), 1186–1223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holston, J. (2008). Insurgent Citizenship: Disjunctions of Democracy and Modernity in Brazil. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Holzner, C. (2004). The end of clientelism? Strong and weak networks in a Mexican squatter movement. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 9(3), 223–240.Google Scholar
Hummel, C. (2021). Why Informal Workers Organize. Contentious Politics, Enforcement, and the State. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2021). Argentina. Ex-post evaluation of exceptional access under the 2018 stand-by arrangement – press release and staff report. Country Report N° 21/279.Google Scholar
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos (INDEC). (2020a). Incidencia de la pobreza y la indigencia en 31 aglomerados urbanos. Segundo semestre de 2019. Informes técnicos. Vol. 4, n° 59; Condiciones de vida. Vol. 4, n° 4.Google Scholar
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos (INDEC). (2020b). Mercado de trabajo. Tasas e indicadores socioeconómicos (EPH). Cuarto trimestre de 2019. Informes técnicos. Vol. 4, n° 53; Trabajo e ingresos. Vol. 4, n° 1.Google Scholar
Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos (INDEC). (2003). ¿Qué es el Gran Buenos Aires?Google Scholar
Iñiguez-Montiel, A. J. (2014). Growth with equity for the development of Mexico: Poverty, inequality, and economic growth (1992–2008). World Development, 59, 313–326.Google Scholar
Jones, M. P., and Mainwaring, S. (2003). The nationalization of parties and party systems. An empirical measure and an application to the Americas. Party Politics, 9(2), 139–166.Google Scholar
Kemahlioğlu, Ö. (2012). Agents or Bosses? Patronage and Intra-Party Politics in Argentina and Turkey. ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Key, Jr., V. O. (1984). Southern Politics in State and Nation. The University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, H. (2000). Linkages between citizens and politicians in democratic polities. Comparative Political Studies, 33(6–7), 845–879.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, H., and Wilkinson, S. I. (2007). Citizen-politician linkages: An introduction. In Kitschelt, H. and Wilkinson, S. I. (Eds.), Patrons, Clients, and Policies. Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition (pp. 1–49). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kothari, R. (1964). The Congress «system» in India. Asian Survey, 4(12), 1161–1173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landau, M. F. (2015). No sólo de globos vive el PRO: El macrismo en la larga tradición del gobierno de la Ciudad. Revista Ciencias Sociales, 87, 74–79.Google Scholar
Lanfranchi, G., Cordara, C., Duarte, J. I., Giménez Hutton, T., Rodríguez, S., and Ferlicca, F. (2018). ¿Cómo crecen las ciudades argentinas? Estudio de la expansión urbana de los 33 grandes aglomerados. CIPPEC.Google Scholar
Langston, J., and Castro Cornejo, R. C. (2023). Why do clientelist brokers go rogue? Parties, politicians, and intermediaries in Mexico. Perspectives on Politics, 21(1), 43–58.Google Scholar
Larreguy, H., Marshall, J., and Querubín, P. (2016). Parties, brokers and voter mobilization: How turnout buying depends upon the party’s capacity to monitor brokers. American Political Science Review, 110(1), 160–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, C. H., and Greene, K. F. (2014). Making clientelism work: How norms of reciprocity increase voter compliance. Comparative Politics, 47(1), 61–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leiras, M. (2007). Todos los caballos del rey. La integración de los partidos políticos y el gobierno democrático de la Argentina, 1995–2003. Prometeo Libros.Google Scholar
Lenarduzzi, J. (2009). La renovación política en el nivel local. Estudio de los casos de Quilmes, Lanús y Almirante Brown (2007–2009). Documento de trabajo. Universidad de Buenos Aires.Google Scholar
Levitsky, S. (2003). Transforming Labor-Based Parties in Latin America. Argentine Peronism in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lindbeck, A., and Weibull, J. W. (1987). Balanced-budget redistribution as the outcome of political competition. Public Choice, 52(3), 273–297.Google Scholar
Luna, J. P. (2014). Segmented Representation. Political party Strategies in Unequal Democracies. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luna, J. P., and Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2014). Introduction: The Right in Contemporary Latin America: A Framework for Analysis. In Luna, J. P. and Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (Eds.), The Resilience of the Latin American Right (pp. 1–22). Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lupu, N. (2019). Why Does Wealth Affect Vote Choice? In Lupu, N., Oliveros, V., and Schiumerini, L. (Eds.), Campaigns and Voters in Developing Democracies: Argentina in Comparative Perspective (pp. 72–88). University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupu, N., Oliveros, V., and Schiumerini, L. (2019). Campaigns and Voters in Developing Democracies: Argentina in Comparative Perspective. University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Magaloni, B. (2006). Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and Its Demise in Mexico. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Malamud, A. (2017). División de Buenos Aires. In Levy Yeyati, E. (comp.), 100 políticas para la Argentina del 2030 (pp. 49–53). Ciudad de Lectores.Google Scholar
Malamud, A., and De Luca, M. (2016). ¿Todo sigue igual que ayer? Continuidad y ruptura en el sistema de partidos argentino (1983–2015). In Freidenberg, F. (Ed.), Los sistemas de partidos en América Latina (1978–2015). Tomo 2. Cono Sur y Países Andinos (pp. 27–68). Instituto Nacional Electoral e Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas, UNAM.Google Scholar
Mattina, G. (2016). De «Macri» a «Mauricio». Una aproximación a los mecanismos de constitución pública del liderazgo político en la Argentina contemporánea. In Vommaro, G. A. and Morresi, S. D. (orgs.), “Hagamos equipo.” PRO y la construcción de la nueva derecha en Argentina (pp. 71–109). Ediciones UNGS, Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento.Google Scholar
Mauro, S. (2020). Electoral coalitions and new political parties in Argentina. The Republican Proposal Party case. Convergencia Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 27, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merklen, D. (2010). Pobres ciudadanos. Las clases populares en la era democrática (Argentina, 1983–2003) (2nd ed.). Editorial Gorla.Google Scholar
Munshi, S. (2022). Clientelism or public goods: Dilemma in a ‘divided democracy’. Constitutional Political Economy, 33(4), 483–506.Google Scholar
Muñoz, P. (2014). An Informational Theory of Campaign Clientelism: The Case of Peru. Comparative Politics, 47(1), 79–98.Google Scholar
Muñoz, P. (2019). Buying Audiences: Clientelism and Electoral Campaigns When Parties Are Weak. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Murillo, M. V. (2000). From populism to neoliberalism: Labor unions and market reforms in Latin America. World Politics, 52(2), 135–174.Google Scholar
Murillo, M. V. (2001). Labor unions, partisan coalitions, and market reforms in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Murillo, M. V., Oliveros, V., and Zarazaga, R. (2021). The most vulnerable poor: Clientelism among slum dwellers. Studies in Comparative International Development, 56(3), 343–363.Google Scholar
Murillo, M. V., and Zarazaga, R. (2020). Argentina: Peronism returns. Journal of Democracy, 31(2), 125–136.Google Scholar
Nichter, S. (2008). Vote buying or turnout buying? Machine politics and the secret ballot. American Political Science Review, 102(1), 19–31.Google Scholar
Nichter, S. (2018). Votes for Survival. Relational Clientelism in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nichter, S., and Palmer-Rubin, B. (2014). Clientelism, Declared Support, and Mexico’s 2012 Campaign. In Domínguez, J. I., Greene, K. F., Lawson, C. H., and Moreno, A. (Eds.), Mexico’s Evolving Democracy. A Comparative Study of the 2012 Elections (pp. 200–226). Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Nichter, S., and Peress, M. (2017). Request fulfilling: When citizens demand clientelist benefits. Comparative Political Studies, 50(8), 1086–1117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novaes, L. M. (2018). Disloyal brokers and weak parties. American Journal of Political Science, 62(1), 84–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Donnell, G. (1993). On the state, democratization and some conceptual problems: A Latin American view with glances at some postcommunist countries. World Development, 21(8), 1355–1369.Google Scholar
Oliveros, V. (2016). Making it personal. Clientelism, favors, and the personalization of public administration in Argentina. Comparative Politics, 48(3), 373–391.Google Scholar
Oliveros, V. (2021). Patronage at Work. Public Jobs and Political Services in Argentina. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ollier, M. M. (2010). Atrapada sin salida. Buenos Aires en la política nacional (1916–2007). UNSAM Edita.Google Scholar
Ollier, M. M. (2016). Maldita Buenos Aires. El resultado electoral 2015. Revista SAAP, 10(1), 141–162.Google Scholar
Ossona, J. L. (2014). Punteros, malandras y porongas. Ocupación de tierras y usos políticos de la pobreza. Siglo XXI Editores.Google Scholar
Pagni, C. (2023). El nudo. Por qué el conurbano bonaerense modela la política argentina. Planeta.Google Scholar
Palmer-Rubin, B. (2016). Interest organizations and distributive politics: Small-business subsidies in Mexico. World Development, 84, 97–117.Google Scholar
Palmer-Rubin, B. (2022). Evading the Patronage Trap: Interest Representation in Mexico. University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perón, J. D. (1997). Ayer, hoy y siempre. Perón en doctrina. Mega Libros Editores.Google Scholar
Piattoni, S. (2001). Clientelism in Historical and Comparative Perspective. In Piattoni, S. (Ed.), Clientelism, Interests, and Democratic Representation. The European Experience in Historical and Comparative Perspective (pp. 1–30). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quirós, J. (2018). Del intercambio al interconocimiento: La etnografía ante los hechos invisibles del trabajo político. Íconos. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 60, 121–142.Google Scholar
Rains, E., and Wibbels, E. (2023). Informal work, risk, and clientelism: Evidence from 223 slums across India. British Journal of Political Science, 53(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
Rakove, M. L. (1975). Don’t Make No Waves… Don’t Back No Losers. An Insider’s Analysis of the Daley Machine. Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Ray, T. F. (1969). The Politics of the Barrios of Venezuela. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, K. M. (2014). Democracy, Free Markets, and the Rightist Dilemma in Latin America. In Luna, J. P. and Kaltwasser, C. Rovira (Eds.), The Resilience of the Latin American Right (pp. 25–47). Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Rossi, F. M. (2017). The Poor’s Struggle for Political Incorporation. The Piquetero Movement in Argentina. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roy, A. (2003). City Requiem, Calcutta: Gender and the Politics of Poverty. University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Roy, A. (2009). Why India cannot plan its cities: Informality, insurgence and the idiom of urbanization. Planning Theory, 8(1), 76–87.Google Scholar
Sain, M. F. (2008). El Leviatán azul. Policía y política en la Argentina. Siglo XXI Editores.Google Scholar
Scherlis, G. E. (2010). Patronage and party organization in Argentina: The emergence of the patronage-based network party [PhD Thesis]. Leiden University.Google Scholar
Schipani, A. (2020). The Left and the Labor Movement in Latin America. 116th Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, California.Google Scholar
Schipani, A., Zarazaga, R., and Forlino, L. (2021). Mapa de las políticas sociales en la Argentina. Aportes para un sistema de protección social más justo y eficiente. CIAS-Fundar.Google Scholar
Shefner, J. (2006). “Do You Think Democracy is a Magical Thing?” From Basic Needs to Democratization in Informal Politics. In Fernández Kelly, P., and Shefner, J. (Eds.), Out of the Shadows: Political Action and the Informal Economy in Latin America (pp. 241–268). The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Shefter, M. (1977). Party and patronage: Germany, England, and Italy. Politics & Society, 7(4), 403–451.Google Scholar
Silva, E. (2017). Reorganizing popular sector incorporation: Propositions from Bolivia, Ecuador, and Venezuela. Politics & Society, 45(1), 91–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, S. C. (2005). Perverse accountability: A formal model of machine politics with evidence from Argentina. American Political Science Review, 99(3), 315–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, S. C. (2007). Political Clientelism. In Boix, C. and Stokes, S. C. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics (pp. 604–627). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stokes, S. C., Dunning, T., Nazareno, M., and Brusco, V. (2013). Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism. The puzzle of Distributive Politics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szwarcberg, M. (2012). Uncertainty, political clientelism, and voter turnout in Latin America. Why parties conduct rallies in Argentina. Comparative Politics, 45(1), 88–106.Google Scholar
Szwarcberg, M. (2015). Mobilizing Poor Voters. Machine Politics, Clientelism, and Social Networks in Argentina. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thachil, T. (2014). Elite parties and poor voters: Theory and evidence from India. American Political Science Review, 108(2), 454–477.Google Scholar
Torre, J. C. (1999). El peronismo como solución y como problema. In Novaro, M. (comp.), Entre el abismo y la ilusión. Peronismo, democracia y mercado (pp. 41–50). Grupo Editorial Norma.Google Scholar
Torre, J. C. (2003). Los huérfanos de la política de partidos. Sobre los alcances y la naturaleza de la crisis de representación partidaria. Desarrollo Económico, 42(168), 647–665.Google Scholar
Tosoni, M. M. (2007). Notas sobre el clientelismo político en la ciudad de México. Perfiles Latinoamericanos, 14(29), 47–69.Google Scholar
Tuñón, I. (2019). Infancia(s). Progresos y retrocesos en clave de desigualdad (Documento estadístico #01; EDSA Serie Agenda para la Equidad 2017–2025). Observatorio de la Deuda Social Argentina. Barómetro de la Deuda Social Argentina. Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina.Google Scholar
United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat). (2016). World Cities Report 2016: Urbanization and Development: Emerging Futures. UNGoogle Scholar
Vommaro, G. A. (2015). El mundo político del conurbano en la democracia reciente. In Kessler, G. (dir.), Historia de la provincia de Buenos Aires. Tomo 6. El Gran Buenos Aires (pp. 365–399). Edhasa y UNIPE: Editorial Universitaria.Google Scholar
Vommaro, G. A., and Armesto, M. (2015). ¿Nuevos políticos en el partido, viejos políticos en las listas? Reclutamiento partidario y división del trabajo político en PRO, en la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires. Pasado Abierto, 1(2), 110–132.Google Scholar
Vommaro, G. A., and Morresi, S. D. (2014). Unidos y diversificados: La construcción del partido PRO en la CABA. Revista SAAP, 8(2), 375–417.Google Scholar
Vommaro, G. A., and Morresi, S. D. (2016). Introducción. El PRO como laboratorio político. Aprehender un partido a partir de los espacios y las temporalidades de su construcción. In Vommaro, G. A. and Morresi, S. D. (orgs.), «Hagamos equipo». PRO y la construcción de la nueva derecha en Argentina (pp. 11–28). Ediciones UNGS, Universidad Nacional de General Sarmiento.Google Scholar
Vommaro, G. A., Morresi, S. D., and Bellotti, A. (2015). Mundo PRO. Anatomía de un partido fabricado para ganar. Planeta.Google Scholar
Vommaro, G. A., and Quirós, J. (2011). «Usted vino por su propia decisión»: Repensar el clientelismo en clave etnográfica. Desacatos, 36, 65–84.Google Scholar
Wacquant, L., Slater, T., and Pereira, V. B. (2014). Territorial stigmatization in action. Environment and Planning A, 46(6), 1270–1280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, C.-S., and Kurzman, C. (2007). The Logistics: How to Buy Votes. In Schaffer, F. C. (Ed.), Elections for Sale. The Causes and Consequences of Vote Buying (pp. 61–78). Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Weitz-Shapiro, R. (2012). What wins votes: Why some politicians opt out of clientelism. American Journal of Political Science, 56(3), 568–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitz-Shapiro, R. (2014). Curbing Clientelism in Argentina: Politics, Poverty, and Social Policy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, S. I. (2007). Explaining Changing Patterns of Party-Voter Linkages in India. In Kitschelt, H. and Wilkinson, S. I. (Eds.), Patrons, Clients, and Policies. Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition (pp. 110–140). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yıldırım, K. (2020). Clientelism and dominant incumbent parties: Party competition in an urban Turkish neighbourhood. Democratization, 27(1), 81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zarazaga, R. (2014). Brokers beyond clientelism: A new perspective through the Argentine case. Latin American Politics and Society, 56(3), 23–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zarazaga, R. (2015a). Los programas de transferencias monetarias condicionadas en Argentina: Análisis sobre el alcance, las condicionalidades y el clientelismo en la Asignación Universal por Hijo y el Programa Argentina Trabaja. Desarrollo Económico, 54(214), 333–356.Google Scholar
Zarazaga, R. (2015b). Plugged in brokers: A model of vote-buying and access to resources. Journal of Applied Economics, 18(2), 369–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zarazaga, R. (2016). Party machines and voter-customized rewards strategies. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 28(4), 678–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zarazaga, R. (2017). Punteros, el rostro del Estado frente a los pobres. In Zarazaga, R. and Ronconi, L. (comps.), Conurbano infinito. Actores políticos y sociales, entre la presencia estatal y la ilegalidad (pp. 19–63). Siglo XXI Editores.Google Scholar
Zarazaga, R. (2019). «Todos unidos triunfaremos…». Nuevas dificultades para la unidad electoral peronista. Revista SAAP, 13(1), 11–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×