Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. Political Thought and the Public Sphere in Tanzania
  • Cited by 85
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
May 2015
Print publication year:
2015
Online ISBN:
9781316104620
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316104620
Subjects:
Area Studies, African Studies, History, African History, History of Ideas and Intellectual History
Series:
African Studies (133)
Information

Book description

Political Thought and the Public Sphere in Tanzania is a study of the interplay of vernacular and global languages of politics in the era of decolonization in Africa. Decolonization is often understood as a moment when Western forms of political order were imposed on non-Western societies, but this book draws attention instead to debates over universal questions about the nature of politics, concept of freedom and the meaning of citizenship. These debates generated political narratives that were formed in dialogue with both global discourses and local political arguments. The United Nations Trusteeship Territory of Tanganyika, now mainland Tanzania, serves as a compelling example of these processes. Starting in 1945 and culminating with the Arusha Declaration of 1967, Emma Hunter explores political argument in Tanzania's public sphere to show how political narratives succeeded when they managed to combine promises of freedom with new forms of belonging at local and national level.

Awards

Winner of the 2016 Gladstone Prize, Royal Historical Society

Reviews

‘Analyzing a rich array of Swhaili-language newspapers and other sources, Emma Hunter brings out the multiple meanings that the people of colonial Tanganyika attached to concepts like freedom, progress, citizenship and representation. Examining debates over forms of belonging, claims to material and social resources and efforts to build local as well as national institutions, she shows that it was only in retrospect, and only partially, that Tanzanian elites reduced the demand for liberation to the assertion of national independence. She demonstrates the interplay of political discourse across localities and regional centers, in the colony as a whole, across the British empire and on an international scale.’

Frederick Cooper - author of Africa since 1940: The Past of the Present

‘In this exciting example of how to explore a new ‘intellectual history from below’, Emma Hunter has pioneered an understanding of how a new African nation, no matter how diverse in its ethnicity and religion, could develop a common political language of concern about how to pursue ‘progress’ while striving for social harmony. The editorial and letter pages of Tanzania’s Swahili-language press in the era of decolonisation provide her with three decades of evidence. Julius Nyerere could construct a national language of debate derived less from the then international languages of freedom or socialism than from their local appropriations which addressed deeply vernacular anxieties about how to maintain justice and accountability in changing times. This is a model of how to pursue a new history of African social and political philosophy that owes nothing to the study of great texts.’

John Lonsdale - Trinity College, Cambridge

‘In this terrific book, Emma Hunter shows that Africans were not simply handed their independence by departing colonial powers. In the Swahili-language press Africans debated the most fundamental questions of democratic politics. They were not spokesmen for local, defensive, territorially bounded traditions. They were co-participants in the making of liberal political discourse. Hunter’s book makes a powerful argument for the global salience of Africa’s intellectual history.’

Derek R. Peterson - University of Michigan

'This sophisticated book is surely at the vanguard of a new way of writing intellectual history. It builds a history of ideas ‘from below’ by working from Swahili language newspapers and other texts in circulation in Tanganyika and from archives in Tanzania and elsewhere … The way Hunter’s focus moves between the microscopic conditions of localities far from any metropolis to the biggest questions of twentieth-century history, such as the theory and practice of democracy, is deeply admirable.'

'Hunter mines a vibrant Tanzanian press, read alongside archival sources, to reveal the complex and diverse ways in which educated voices reworked old vocabularies and styled new ones to make sense of an era of political transition between 1945 and 1967. Her book uncovers a fascinating landscape of ideas in motion, suggesting important new conceptual avenues for future research on decolonization and democracy in Africa as well as modeling new methodological strategies for such analysis.'

Priya Lal Source: African Studies Review

‘Hunter’s adeptness at moving between the specificity of such particular cases and the broad discussion of abstract ideas on a global scale is facilitated by her lucid writing and engagement with an impressively wide body of comparative scholarly literature. These features help make this book at once accessible to non-specialists and meaningful to Africanists.’

Priya Lal Source: African Studies Review

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

Contents

Contents

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.