Book contents
- Political Responsibility & Tech Governance
- Political Responsibility & Tech Governance
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 The Problem of Structural Injustice
- Chapter 2 Artificial Intelligence and Ground Truth
- Chapter 3 Repro-tech and the Genetic Supermarket
- Chapter 4 Putting the Public into the Public Body
- Chapter 5 Conclusion
- Appendix Legal, Moral and Structural Actions, Injustices and Responsibilities
- References
- Index
Chapter 2 - Artificial Intelligence and Ground Truth
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 February 2025
- Political Responsibility & Tech Governance
- Political Responsibility & Tech Governance
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Epigraph
- Contents
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 The Problem of Structural Injustice
- Chapter 2 Artificial Intelligence and Ground Truth
- Chapter 3 Repro-tech and the Genetic Supermarket
- Chapter 4 Putting the Public into the Public Body
- Chapter 5 Conclusion
- Appendix Legal, Moral and Structural Actions, Injustices and Responsibilities
- References
- Index
Summary
Humanity’s increasing reliance on AI and robotics is driven by compelling narratives of efficiency in which the human is a poor substitute for the extraordinary computational power of machine learning, the creative competences of generative AI as well as the speed, accuracy and consistency of automation in so many spheres of human activity. Indeed, AI is increasingly becoming the core technological foundation of many contemporary societies. Most thinking on how to manage the downside risks to humanity of this seismic societal shift is set out in a direct fault-based relationship such as the innovative EU AI Act which is by far the most comprehensive political attempt to locate (or deter) those directly responsible for AI-generated harm. I argue that while such approaches are vital for combating injustice exacerbated by AI and robotics, too little thought goes into political approaches to the structural dynamics of AI’s impact on society. By way of example, I examine the UK ‘pro-innovation’ approach to AI governance and explore how it fails to address the structural injustices inherent in increasing AI usage.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Political Responsibility and Tech GovernanceAI, Repro-tech and Structural Injustice, pp. 49 - 85Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2025