<span class='italic'>Advocate</span> The promise of community policing

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511489334.002

2 - Advocate The promise of community policing

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009

Wesley G. Skogan

Edited by

David Weisburd and

Anthony A. Braga

Show author details

Wesley G. Skogan: Affiliation:
Professor of Political Science and a member of the research faculty University's Institute for Policy Research
David Weisburd: Affiliation:
Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Anthony A. Braga: Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Community policing is very popular. So popular is the concept with politicians, city managers, and the general public, that few police chiefs want to be caught without some program they can call community policing. In a 1997 survey of police departments conducted by the Police Foundation, 85 percent reported they had adopted community policing or were in the process of doing so (Skogan 2004). The biggest reason for not doing so was that community policing was “impractical” for their community, and my own tabulations of the data found these replies were mostly from small departments with only a few officers. Bigger cities included in the survey (those with populations greater than 100,000) all claimed in the 1997 survey to have adopted community policing – half by 1991 and the other half between 1992 and 1997. By 2000, a federal survey with a much larger sample found that more than 90 percent of departments in cities over 250,000 in population reported having full-time, trained community policing officers in the field (Bureau of Justice Statistics 2003).

What do cities that claim they are “doing community policing” actually do? They describe a long list of projects. Under the rubric of community policing, officers patrol on foot (in the 1997 survey, 75 percent listed this), or perhaps on horses, bicycles, or segways. Departments variously train civilians in citizen police academies, open small neighborhood storefront offices, conduct surveys to measure community satisfaction, canvass door-to-door to identify local problems, publish newsletters, conduct drug education projects, and work with municipal agencies to enforce health and safety regulations.

Type: Chapter
Information: Police Innovation
Contrasting Perspectives
, pp. 27 - 43

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489334.002 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Braga, A. A., Weisburd, D. L., Waring, E. J., Mazerolle, L. G., Spelman, W., and Gajewski, F. (1999). Problem-oriented policing in violent crime places: A randomized controlled experiment. Criminology, 37, 541–580.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bureau of Justice Statistics. (2001). Community policing in local police departments 1997 and 1999. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, US Department of Justice.

Bureau of Justice Statistics (2003). Local police departments 2000. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics, US Department of Justice.

Butterfield, F. (2004). As cities struggle, police get by with less. New York Times, July 27.Google Scholar

Capowich, G. E. (2005). A case study of community policing implementation: Contrasting success and failure. In Kerley, K. R. (ed.), Policing and program evaluation. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

Cordner, G. and Biebel, E. (2005). Problem-oriented policing in practice. Criminology and Public Policy, 4, 155–180.

Eck, J. E. (2004). Why don't problems get solved? In Skogan, W. G. (ed.), Community policing: Can it work?Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar

Eck, J. E. and Wartell, J. (1998). Improving the management of rental properties with drug problems: A randomized experiment. In Mazerolle, L. G. and Roehl, J. (eds.), Civil remedies and crime prevention, 9 (pp. 161–183). Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar

Greene, J. R. (2004). Community policing and organization change. In Skogan, Wesley G. (ed.), Community policing: Can it work? (pp. 30–53). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar

Grinc, R. M. (1994). “Angles in marble”: Problems in stimulating community involvement in community policing. Crime and Delinquency, 40, 437–468.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lurigio, A. and Rosenbaum, D. (1994). The impact of community policing on police personnel. In Rosenbaum, D. P. (ed.), The challenge of community policing: Testing the promises. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRef Google Scholar

Mastrofski, S. D. (1998). Community policing and police organization structure. In Brodeur, J. (ed.), Community policing and the evaluation of police service delivery (pp. 161–189). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Moy, P. and Pfau, M. (2000). With malice toward all? The media and public confidence in democratic institutions. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishing.Google Scholar

Pate, A. M. and Shtull, P. (1994). Community policing grows in Brooklyn: An inside view of the New York Police Department's model precinct. Crime and Delinquency, 40, 384–410.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sadd, S. and Grinc, R. (1994). Innovative neighborhood oriented policing: An evaluation of community policing programs in eight cities. In Rosenbaum, D. P. (ed.), The challenge of community policing: Testing the promises (pp. 27–52). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRef Google Scholar

Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S., and Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918–924.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Skogan, W. G. (1988). Community organizations and crime. In Tonry, M. and Morris, N. (eds.), Crime and justice: An annual review, 10. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Skogan, W. G. (1990). Disorder and decline: Crime and the spiral of decay in American cities. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar

Skogan, W. G. (2004). Community policing: Common impediments to success. In Fridell, L. and Wycoff, M. A. (eds.), Community policing: the past, present, and future. Washington, DC: The Annie E. Casey Foundation and the Police Executive Research Forum, 159–168.Google Scholar

Skogan, W. G. and Hartnett, S. (1997). Community policing, Chicago style. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Skogan, W. G. and Steiner, L. (2004). Community policing in Chicago, year ten. Chicago: Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority.Google Scholar

Skogan, W. G., Hartnett, S., DuBois, J., Comey, J., Kaiser, M., and Lovig, J. (1999). On the beat: Police and community problem solving. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

Skogan, W. G., Steiner, L., Hartnett, S., DuBois, J., Bennis, J., Rottinghaus, B., Kim, S., Van, K., and Rosenbaum, D. (2003). Community policing in Chicago, years eight and nine. Chicago: Illinois Criminal Justice Information Authority.Google Scholar

Weisburd, D., Mastrofski, S., McNally, A. M., Greenspan, R., and Willis, J. (2003). Reforming to preserve: Compstat and strategic problem solving in American policing. Criminology and Public Policy, 2, 421–456.CrossRef Google Scholar