Book contents
- Placental–Fetal Growth Restriction
- Placental–Fetal Growth Restriction
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Glossary and Commonly Used Abbreviations
- Section 1 Basic Principles
- Section 2 Maternal Cardiovascular Characteristics and the Placenta
- Section 3 Screening for Placental–Fetal Growth Restriction
- Chapter 11 First Trimester Combined Screening Algorithms for Fetal Growth Restriction
- Chapter 12 Second Trimester and Late-Pregnancy Screening for Fetal Growth Restriction
- Section 4 Prophylaxis and Treatment
- Section 5 Characteristics of Fetal Growth Restriction
- Section 6 Management of Fetal Growth Restriction
- Section 7 Postnatal Aspects of Fetal Growth Restriction
- Index
- References
Chapter 12 - Second Trimester and Late-Pregnancy Screening for Fetal Growth Restriction
from Section 3 - Screening for Placental–Fetal Growth Restriction
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 July 2018
Book contents
- Placental–Fetal Growth Restriction
- Placental–Fetal Growth Restriction
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Glossary and Commonly Used Abbreviations
- Section 1 Basic Principles
- Section 2 Maternal Cardiovascular Characteristics and the Placenta
- Section 3 Screening for Placental–Fetal Growth Restriction
- Chapter 11 First Trimester Combined Screening Algorithms for Fetal Growth Restriction
- Chapter 12 Second Trimester and Late-Pregnancy Screening for Fetal Growth Restriction
- Section 4 Prophylaxis and Treatment
- Section 5 Characteristics of Fetal Growth Restriction
- Section 6 Management of Fetal Growth Restriction
- Section 7 Postnatal Aspects of Fetal Growth Restriction
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Placental-Fetal Growth Restriction , pp. 105 - 119Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Imdad, A, Yakoob MY, Siddiqui S, Bhutta ZA. Screening and triage of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) in general population and high risk pregnancies: A systematic review with a focus on reduction of IUGR related stillbirths. BMC Public Health 2011;11 Suppl 3:S1. DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-S3-S1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, JMG, Jungner, G. Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease. World Health Organization: Geneva, 1968.Google Scholar
Cetin, I, Huppertz B, Burton G, Cuckle H, Gonen R, Lapaire O, Mandia L, Nicolaides K, Redman C, Soothill P, Spencer K, Thilaganathan B, Williams D, Meiri H. Pregenesys pre-eclampsia markers consensus meeting: What do we require from markers, risk assessment and model systems to tailor preventive strategies? Placenta 2011;32 Suppl:S4–16. DOI 10.1016/j.placenta.2010.11.022.Google Scholar
Breeze, AC, Lees, CC. Prediction and perinatal outcomes of fetal growth restriction. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2007;12:383–97. DOI 10.1016/j.siny.2007.07.002.Google Scholar
Morris, RK, Malin GL, Tsourapas A, Roberts TE, Khan KS. An economic evaluation of alternative test-intervention strategies to prevent fetal growth restriction in singleton pregnancies. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2010;95:F12.Google Scholar
Bujold, E, Roberge S, Lacasse Y, Bureau M, Audibert F, Marcoux S, Forest JC, Giguere Y. Prevention of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction with aspirin started in early pregnancy: A meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116:402–14. DOI 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e9322a.Google Scholar
Baschat, AA, Cosmi E, Bilardo CM, Wolf H, Berg C, Rigano S, Germer U, Moyano D, Turan S, Hartung J, Bhide A, Muller T, Bower S, Nicolaides KH, Thilaganathan B, Gembruch U, Ferrazzi E, Hecher K, Galan HL, Harman CR. Predictors of neonatal outcome in early-onset placental dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:253–61. DOI 10.1097/01.AOG.0000253215.79121.75.Google Scholar
Royal College of Obstetricans and Gynaecologists (2013). Green-top guidelines No. 31. The investigation and management of the Small-for-Gestational-Age Fetus. London: Royal College of Obstetricans and Gynaecologists. Available at www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/guidelines/gtg31 (accessed 11/10/2014).Google Scholar
Lausman, A, Kingdom J, Gagnon CR, Basso M, Bos H, Crane J, Davies G, Delisle MF, Hudon L, Menticoglou S, Mundle W, Ouellet A, Pressey T, Pylypjuk C, Roggensack A, Sanderson F. Intrauterine growth restriction: Screening, diagnosis, and management. JOGC 2013;35:741–57.Google Scholar
American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice bulletin no. 134: fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol 2013;121:1122–33. DOI 10.1097/01.AOG.0000429658.85846.f9.Google Scholar
Robert Peter, J, Ho JJ, Valliapan J, Sivasangari S. Symphysial fundal height (SFH) measurement in pregnancy for detecting abnormal fetal growth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;7:CD008136. DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD008136.pub2.Google Scholar
Morse, K, Williams A, Gardosi J. Fetal growth screening by fundal height measurement. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2009;23:809–18. DOI 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2009.09.004.Google Scholar
Stampalija, T, Gyte GM, Alfirevic Z. Utero-placental Doppler ultrasound for improving pregnancy outcome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010:CD008363. DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD008363.pub2.Google Scholar
Napolitano, R, Melchiorre K, Arcangeli T, Dias T, Bhide A, Thilaganathan B. Thilaganathan. Screening for pre-eclampsia by using changes in uterine artery Doppler indices with advancing gestation. Prenat Diagn 2012;32:180–4. DOI 10.1002/pd.2930.Google Scholar
Fox, C, Khan KS, Coomarasamy A. How to interpret randomised trials of test-treatment combinations: A critical evaluation of research on uterine Doppler test to predict, and aspirin to prevent, pre-eclampsia. BJOG 2010;117:801–8. DOI 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02577.x.Google Scholar
Goffinet, F, Aboulker D, Paris-Llado J, Bucourt M, Uzan M, Papiernik E, Breart G. Screening with a uterine Doppler in low risk pregnant women followed by low dose aspirin in women with abnormal results: A multicenter randomised controlled trial. BJOG 2001;108:510–18.Google Scholar
Subtil, D, Goeusse P, Houfflin-Debarge V, Puech F, Lequien P, Breart G, Uzan S, Quandalle F, Delcourt YM, Malek YM, Essai G, Regional Aspirine Mere-Enfant Collaborative. Randomised comparison of uterine artery Doppler and aspirin (100 mg) with placebo in nulliparous women: The Essai Regional Aspirine Mere-Enfant study (Part 2). BJOG 2003;110:485–91.Google Scholar
Papageorghiou, AT, Yu CK, Cicero S, Bower S, Nicolaides KH. Second-trimester uterine artery Doppler screening in unselected populations: A review. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2002;12:78–88. DOI 10.1080/jmf.12.2.78.88.Google Scholar
Papageorghiou, AT, Leslie K, . Uterine artery Doppler in the prediction of adverse pregnancy outcome. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2007;19:103–9. DOI 10.1097/GCO.0b013e32809bd964.Google Scholar
Cnossen, JS, Morris RK, ter Riet G, Mol BW, van der Post JA, Coomarasamy A, Zwinderman AH, Robson SC, Bindels PJ, Kleijnen J, Khan KS. Use of uterine artery Doppler ultrasonography to predict pre-eclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction: A systematic review and bivariable meta-analysis. CMAJ 2008;178:701–11. DOI 10.1503/cmaj.070430.Google Scholar
Deeks, JJ, Altman DG, . Diagnostic tests 4: Likelihood ratios. BMJ 2004;329:168–9. DOI 10.1136/bmj.329.7458.168.Google Scholar
Fayyad, AM, Harrington KF, . Prediction and prevention of preeclampsia and IUGR. Early Hum Dev 2005;81:865–76. DOI 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2005.09.005.Google Scholar
Morris, RK, Cnossen JS, Langejans M, Robson SC, Kleijnen J, Ter Riet G, Mol BW, van der Post JA, Khan KS. Serum screening with Down’s syndrome markers to predict pre-eclampsia and small for gestational age: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2008;8:33. DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-8-33.Google Scholar
Hui, D, Okun N, Murphy K, Kingdom J, Uleryk E, Shah PS. Combinations of maternal serum markers to predict preeclampsia, small for gestational age, and stillbirth: A systematic review. JOGC 2012;34:142–53.Google ScholarPubMed
Conde-Agudelo, A, Papageorghiou AT, Kennedy SH, Villar J. Novel biomarkers for predicting intrauterine growth restriction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 2013;120:681–94. DOI 10.1111/1471-0528.12172.Google Scholar
Napolitano, R, Santo S, D’Souza R, Bhide A, Thilaganathan B. Sensitivity of higher, lower and mean second-trimester uterine artery Doppler resistance indices in screening for pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010;36:573–6. DOI 10.1002/uog.7645.Google Scholar
Meads, CA, Cnossen JS, Meher S, Juarez-Garcia A, ter Riet G, Duley L, Roberts TE, Mol BW, van der Post JA, Leeflang MM, Barton PM, Hyde CJ, Gupta JK, Khan KS. Methods of prediction and prevention of pre-eclampsia: Systematic reviews of accuracy and effectiveness literature with economic modelling. Health Technol Assess 2008;12:iii–iv, 1–270.Google Scholar
Kleinrouweler, CE, Bossuyt PM, Thilaganathan B, Vollebregt KC, Arenas Ramirez J, Ohkuchi A, Deurloo KL, Macleod M, Diab AE, Wolf H, van der Post JA, Mol BW, Pajkrt E. Value of adding second-trimester uterine artery Doppler to patient characteristics in identification of nulliparous women at increased risk for pre-eclampsia: An individual patient data meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;42:257–67. DOI 10.1002/uog.12435.Google Scholar
Audibert, F, Benchimol Y, Benattar C, Champagne C, Frydman R. Prediction of preeclampsia or intrauterine growth restriction by second trimester serum screening and uterine Doppler velocimetry. Fetal Diagn Ther 2005;20:48–53. DOI 10.1159/000081369.Google Scholar
Bricker, L, Neilson JP, Dowswell T. Routine ultrasound in late pregnancy (after 24 weeks’ gestation). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008:CD001451. DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD001451.pub3.Google Scholar
Napolitano, R, Dhami J, Ohuma EO, Ioannou C, Conde-Agudelo A, Kennedy SH, Villar J, Papageorghiou AT. Pregnancy dating by fetal crown-rump length: A systematic review of charts. BJOG 2014;121:556–65. DOI 10.1111/1471-0528.12478.Google Scholar
Ioannou, C, Talbot K, Ohuma E, Sarris I, Villar J, Conde-Agudelo A, Papageorghiou A. Systematic review of methodology used in ultrasound studies aimed at creating charts of fetal size. BJOG 2012;119:1425–39.Google Scholar
Gardosi, J, Chang A, Kalyan B, Sahota D, Symonds EM. Customised antenatal growth charts. Lancet 1992;339:283–7.Google Scholar
Gardosi, J, Francis A, . Adverse pregnancy outcome and association with small for gestational age birthweight by customized and population-based percentiles. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009;201:28 e21-28. DOI 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.04.034.Google Scholar
Owen, P, Ogston S, . Conditional centiles for the quantification of fetal growth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1998;11:110–17. DOI 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1998.11020110.x.Google Scholar
Papageorghiou, AT, Kennedy SH, Salomon LJ, Ohuma EO, Cheikh Ismail L, Barros FC, Lambert A, Carvalho M, Jaffer YA, Bertino E, Gravett MG, Altman DG, Purwar M, Noble JA, Pang R, Victora CG, Bhutta ZA, Villar J, International and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century. International standards for early fetal size and pregnancy dating based on ultrasound measurement of crown-rump length in the first trimester of pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014;44:641–8. DOI 10.1002/uog.13448.Google Scholar
Papageorghiou, AT, Ohuma EO, Altman DG, Todros T, Cheikh Ismail L, Lambert A, Jaffer YA, Bertino E, Gravett MG, Purwar M, Noble JA, Pang R, Victora CG, Barros FC, Carvalho M, Salomon LJ, Bhutta ZA, Kennedy SH, Villar J, International and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century. International standards for fetal growth based on serial ultrasound measurements: The Fetal Growth Longitudinal Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project. Lancet 2014;384:869–79. DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61490–2.Google Scholar
Souka, AP, Papastefanou I, Pilalis A, Michalitsi V, Kassanos D. Performance of third-trimester ultrasound for prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates and evaluation of contingency screening policies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012; 39:535–42. DOI 10.1002/uog.10078.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindqvist, PG, Molin J, . Does antenatal identification of small-for-gestational age fetuses significantly improve their outcome? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2005;25:258–64. DOI 10.1002/uog.1806.Google Scholar
Ben-Haroush A, , Yogev Y, , Hod, M, Bar J, . Predictive value of a single early fetal weight estimate in normal pregnancies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2007;130:187–92. DOI 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.04.018.Google Scholar
De Reu, PA, Smits LJ, Oosterbaan HP, and Nijhuis JG. Value of a single early third trimester fetal biometry for the prediction of birth weight deviations in a low risk population. J Perinat Med 2008;36:324–9. DOI 10.1515/JPM.2008.057.Google Scholar
Sylvan K, , Ryding, EL, Rydhstroem H, . Routine ultrasound screening in the third trimester: A population-based study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005;84:1154–8. DOI 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00649.x.Google Scholar
Sovio, U, White IR, Dacey A, Pasupathy D, Smith GC. Screening for fetal growth restriction with universal third trimester ultrasonography in nulliparous women in the Pregnancy Outcome Prediction (POP) study: A prospective cohort study. Lancet 2015;386:2089–97. DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00131-2.Google Scholar
Fadigas, C, Saiid Y, Gonzalez R, Poon LC, Nicolaides KH. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: Screening by fetal biometry at 35–37 weeks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015;45:559–65. DOI 10.1002/uog.14816.Google Scholar
Roma, E, Arnau A, Berdala R, Bergos C, Montesinos J, Figueras F. Ultrasound screening for fetal growth restriction at 36 vs 32 weeks’ gestation: A randomized trial (ROUTE). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2015;46:391–7. DOI 10.1002/uog.14915.Google Scholar
Evans, S, Newnham J, MacDonald W, Hall C. Characterisation of the possible effect on birthweight following frequent prenatal ultrasound examinations. Early Hum Dev 1996;45:203–14.Google Scholar
Chang, TC, Robson SC, Spencer JA, Gallivan S. Identification of fetal growth retardation: Comparison of Doppler waveform indices and serial ultrasound measurements of abdominal circumference and fetal weight. Obstet Gynecol 1993;82:230–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Owen, P, Khan KS, . Fetal growth velocity in the prediction of intrauterine growth retardation in a low risk population. BJOG 1998;105:536–40.Google Scholar
Sarris, I, Ohuma E, Roseman F, Hoch L, Altman DG, Papageorghiou AT. Sonographer standardisation of fetal biometry ultrasound measurements: An exercise to improve quality and consistency in a large, prospective, multi-centre study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;38:681–87.Google Scholar
Sarris, I, Ioannou C, Chamberlain P, Ohuma E, Roseman F, Hoch L, Altman DG, Papageorghiou AT. Intra- and interobserver variability in fetal ultrasound measurements. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2012;39:266–73. DOI 10.1002/uog.10082.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed