Book contents
- Placental–Fetal Growth Restriction
- Placental–Fetal Growth Restriction
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Glossary and Commonly Used Abbreviations
- Section 1 Basic Principles
- Section 2 Maternal Cardiovascular Characteristics and the Placenta
- Section 3 Screening for Placental–Fetal Growth Restriction
- Section 4 Prophylaxis and Treatment
- Section 5 Characteristics of Fetal Growth Restriction
- Section 6 Management of Fetal Growth Restriction
- Chapter 22 Management of Early-Onset Fetal Growth Restriction (Less than 34 Weeks)
- Chapter 23 Late-Onset Fetal Growth Restriction
- Chapter 24 Severe Fetal Growth Restriction: Pregnancy Management at the Limits of Viability
- Chapter 25 Fetal Growth Restriction in Twin Pregnancies
- Section 7 Postnatal Aspects of Fetal Growth Restriction
- Index
- References
Chapter 22 - Management of Early-Onset Fetal Growth Restriction (Less than 34 Weeks)
from Section 6 - Management of Fetal Growth Restriction
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 July 2018
Book contents
- Placental–Fetal Growth Restriction
- Placental–Fetal Growth Restriction
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Glossary and Commonly Used Abbreviations
- Section 1 Basic Principles
- Section 2 Maternal Cardiovascular Characteristics and the Placenta
- Section 3 Screening for Placental–Fetal Growth Restriction
- Section 4 Prophylaxis and Treatment
- Section 5 Characteristics of Fetal Growth Restriction
- Section 6 Management of Fetal Growth Restriction
- Chapter 22 Management of Early-Onset Fetal Growth Restriction (Less than 34 Weeks)
- Chapter 23 Late-Onset Fetal Growth Restriction
- Chapter 24 Severe Fetal Growth Restriction: Pregnancy Management at the Limits of Viability
- Chapter 25 Fetal Growth Restriction in Twin Pregnancies
- Section 7 Postnatal Aspects of Fetal Growth Restriction
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Placental-Fetal Growth Restriction , pp. 201 - 208Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Mari, G, Hanif, F, Treadwell, MC, Kruger, M. Gestational age at delivery and Doppler waveforms in very preterm intrauterine growth-restricted fetuses as predictors of perinatal mortality. J Ultrasound Med 2007 May;26:555–9.Google Scholar
Garite, TJ, Clark, R, Thorp, JA. Intrauterine growth restriction increases morbidity and mortality among premature neonates. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191:481–7.Google Scholar
Aucott, SW, Donohue, PK, Northington, FJ. Increased morbidity in severe early intrauterine growth restriction. J Perinatol 2004;24:435–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morsing, E, Asard, M, Ley, D, Stjernqvist, K, Marsál, K. Cognitive function after intrauterine growth restriction and very preterm birth. Pediatrics 2011;127:e874–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guellec, I, Lapillonne, A, Renolleau, S, Charlaluk, ML, Roze, JC, Marret, S, Vieux, R, Monique, K, Ancel, PY; EPIPAGE Study Group. Neurologic outcomes at school age in very preterm infants born with severe or mild growth restriction. Pediatrics 2011;127:e883–91.Google Scholar
Barker, DJ, Osmond, C. Infant mortality, childhood nutrition, and ischaemic heart disease in England and Wales. Lancet 1986; 1: 1077–81Kanaka-Gantenbein C. Fetal origins of adult diabetes. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2010;1205:99–105.Google Scholar
Baschat, AA, Cosmi, E, Bilardo, CM, Wolf, H, Berg, C, Rigano, S, Germer, U, Moyano, D, Turan, S, Hartung, J, Bhide, A, Müller, T, Bower, S, Nicolaides, KH, Thilaganathan, B, Gembruch, U, Ferrazzi, E, Hecher, K, Galan, HL, Harman, CR. Predictors of neonatal outcome in early-onset placental dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol 2007;109:253–61.Google Scholar
Baschat, AA, Viscardi, RM, Hussey-Gardner, B, Hashmi, N, Harman, C. Infant neurodevelopment following fetal growth restriction: Relationship with antepartum surveillance parameters. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;33:44–50.Google Scholar
Torrance, HL, Bloemen, MC, Mulder, EJ, Nikkels, PG, Derks, JB, de Vries, LS, Visser, GH. Predictors of outcome at 2 years of age after early intrauterine growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 36:171–7.Google Scholar
Soothill, PW, Ajayi, RA, Campbell, S, Ross, EM, Candy, DC, Snijders, RM, Nicolaides, KH. Relationship between fetal acidemia at cordocentesis and subsequent neurodevelopment. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1992;2:80–3.Google Scholar
Bernstein, IM, Horbar, JD, Badger, GJ, Ohlsson, A, Golan, A. Morbidity and mortality among very-low-birth-weight neonates with intrauterine growth restriction. The Vermont Oxford Network. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;182:198–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lees, C, Marlow, N, Arabin, B, Bilardo, CM, Brezinka, C, Derks, JB, Duvekot, J,Frusca, T, Diemert, A, Ferrazzi, E, Ganzevoort, W, Hecher, K, Martinelli, P, Ostermayer, E, Papageorghiou, AT, Schlembach, D, Schneider, KT, Thilaganathan, B, Todros, T, Van Wassenaer-Leemhuis, A, Valcamonico, A, Visser, GH, Wolf, H; TRUFFLE Group. Perinatal morbidity and mortality in early-onset fetal growth restriction: Cohort outcomes of the trial of randomized umbilical and fetal flow in Europe (TRUFFLE). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42:400–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Groom, KM, North, RA, Poppe, KK, Sadler, L, McCowan, LM. The association between customised small for gestational age infants and pre-eclampsia or gestational hypertension varies with gestation at delivery. BJOG 2007;114:478–84.Google Scholar
Hofstaetter, C, Dubiel, M, Gudmundsson, S. Two types of umbilical venous pulsations and outcome of high-risk pregnancy. Early Hum Dev 2001;61:111–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baschat, AA, Gembruch, U, Weiner, CP, Harman, CR. Qualitative venous Doppler waveform analysis improves prediction of critical perinatal outcomes in premature growth-restricted fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003;22:240–5.Google ScholarPubMed
Baschat, AA, Gembruch, U, Gortner, L, Reiss, I, Weiner, CP, Harman, CR. Coronary artery blood flow visualization signifies hemodynamic deterioration in growth-restricted fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2000;16:425–31.Google Scholar
Chaoui, R. Coronary arteries in fetal life: Physiology, malformations and the “heart-sparing effect.” Acta Paediatr Suppl 2004;93:6–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rizzo, G, Capponi, A, Pietrolucci, ME, Boccia, C, Arduini, D. The significance of visualising coronary blood flow in early onset severe growth restricted fetuses with reverse flow in the ductus venosus. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2009;22:547–51.Google Scholar
Flynn, AM, Kelly, J, O’Conor, M. Unstressed antepartum cardiotocography in the management of the fetus suspected of growth retardation. BJOG 1979;86:106–10.Google Scholar
Visser, GH, Redman, CW, Huisjes, HJ, Turnbull, AC. Nonstressed antepartum heart rate monitoring: Implications of decelerations after spontaneous contractions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980; 138:429–35.Google Scholar
Ayres-de-Campos, D, Bernardes, J, Costa-Pereira, A, Pereira-Leite, L. Inconsistencies in classification by experts of cardiotocograms and subsequent clinical decision. BJOG 1999;106:1307–10.Google Scholar
Dawes, GS, Lobb, M, Moulden, M, Redman, CW, Wheeler, T. Antenatal cardiotocogram quality and interpretation using computers. BJOG 1992;99:791–7.Google Scholar
Van Ravenswaaij-Arts, CM, Kollée, LA, Hopman, JC, Stoelinga, GB, Van Geijn, HP. Heart rate variability. Ann Intern Med 1993;118:436–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Visser, GH, Bekedam, DJ, Ribbert, LS. Changes in antepartum heart rate patterns with progressive deterioration of the fetal condition. Int J Biomed Comput 1990;25:239–46.Google Scholar
Guzman, ER, Vintzileos, AM, Martins, M, Benito, C, Houlihan, C, Hanley, M. The efficacy of individual computer heart rate indices in detecting acidemia at birth in growth-restricted fetuses. Obstet Gynecol 1996;87:969–74.Google Scholar
Street, P, Dawes, GS, Moulden, M, Redman, CW. Short-term variation in abnormal antenatal fetal heart rate records. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1991;165:515–23.Google Scholar
Serra, V, Moulden, M, Bellver, J, Redman, CW. The value of the short-term fetal heart rate variation for timing the delivery of growth-retarded fetuses. BJOG 2008; 115:1101–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hecher, K, Bilardo, CM, Stigter, RH, Ville, Y, Hackelöer, BJ, Kok, HJ, Senat, MV, Visser, GH. Monitoring of fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction: A longitudinal study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001; 18:564–70.Google Scholar
Bilardo, CM, Wolf, H, Stigter, RH, Ville, Y, Baez, E, Visser, GH, Hecher, K. Relationship between monitoring parameters and perinatal outcome in severe, early intrauterine growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004;23:119–25.Google Scholar
Walkinshaw, S, Cameron, H, MacPhail, S, Robson, S. The prediction of fetal compromise and acidosis by biophysical profile scoring in the small for gestational age fetus. J Perinat Med 1992;20:227–32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baschat, AA, Gembruch, U, Harman, CR. The sequence of changes in Doppler and biophysical parameters as severe fetal growth restriction worsens. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;18:571–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turan, S, Turan, OM, Berg, C, Moyano, D, Bhide, A, Bower, S, Thilaganathan, B, Gembruch, U, Nicolaides, K, Harman, C, Baschat, AA. Computerized fetal heart rate analysis, Doppler ultrasound and biophysical profile score in the prediction of acid-base status of growth-restricted fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2007; 30:750–6.Google Scholar
Yoon, BH, Romero, R, Roh, CR, Kim, SH, Ager, JW, Syn, HC, Cotton, D, Kim, SW. Relationship between the fetal biophysical profile score, umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry, and fetal blood acid-base status determined by cordocentesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;169:1586–94.Google Scholar
Ferrazzi, E, Bozzo, M, Rigano, S, Bellotti, M, Morabito, A, Pardi, G, Battaglia, FC, Galan, HL. Temporal sequence of abnormal Doppler changes in the peripheral and central circulatory systems of the severely growth-restricted fetus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002;19:140–6.Google Scholar
Lees, C; Marlow, N, Van Wassenaer-Leemhuis, A, Arabin, B, Bilardo, CM, Brezinka, C, Calvert, S, Derks, JB, Diemert, A, Duvekot, JJ, Ferrazzi, E, Frusca, T, Ganzevoort, W, Hecher, K, Martinelli, P, Ostermayer, E, Papageorghiou, AT, Schlembach, D, Schneider, KTM, Thilaganathan, B, Todros, T, Valcamonico, A, Visser, GHA, Wolf, H on behalf of the TRUFFLE Group. The Trial of Randomized Umbilical and Fetal Flow in Europe (TRUFFLE) study: Two year neurodevelopmental and intermediate perinatal outcomes. Lancet 2015;385:2162–72.Google Scholar
Figueras, F, Benavides, A, Del, Rio, M, Crispi, F, Eixarch, E, Martinez, JM, Hernandez-Andrade, E, Gratacós, E. Monitoring of fetuses with intrauterine growth restriction: Longitudinal changes in ductus venosus and aortic isthmus flow. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;33:39–43.Google Scholar
Arduini, D, Rizzo, G, Romanini, C. Changes of pulsatility index from fetal vessels preceding the onset of late decelerations in growth-retarded fetuses. Obstet Gynecol 1992;79:605–10.Google ScholarPubMed
Baschat, AA. Neurodevelopment following fetal growth restriction and its relationship with antepartum parameters of placental dysfunction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;37:501–14Google Scholar
Turan, OM, Turan, S, Gungor, S, Berg, C, Moyano, D, Gembruch, U, Nicolaides, KH, Harman, CR, Baschat, AA. Progression of Doppler abnormalities in intrauterine growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008;32:160–7.Google Scholar
Odegård, RA, Vatten, LJ, Nilsen, ST, Salvesen, KA, Austgulen, R. Preeclampsia and fetal growth. Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:950–5.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, S, Irgens, LM. Fetal growth and body proportion in preeclampsia. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 101:575–83.Google Scholar
Allen, VM, Joseph, K, Murphy, KE, Magee, LA, Ohlsson, A. The effect of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy on small for gestational age and stillbirth: A population based study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2004;4:17.Google Scholar
Khalil, A, Garcia-Mandujano, R, Maiz, N, Elkhaouli, M, Nicolaides, KH. Longitudinal changes in uterine artery Doppler and blood pressure and risk of pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014;43:541–7.Google Scholar
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Hypertension in pregnancy: The management of hypertensive disorders during pregnancy. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg107 (accessed January 18, 2015).Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Task Force on Hypertension in Pregnancy. Hypertension in Pregnancy. www.acog.org/Womens-Health/Preeclampsia-and-Hypertension-in-Pregnancy (accessed January 18, 2015).Google Scholar
Brodszki, J, Morsing, E, Malcus, P, Thuring, A, Ley, D, Marsál, K. Early intervention in management of very preterm growth-restricted fetuses: 2-year outcome of infants delivered on fetal indication before 30 gestational weeks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 34:288–96.Google Scholar
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The Investigation and Management of the Small-for-Gestational-Age Fetus. Green-top Guideline No. 31. 2nd Edition. February 2013. Minor revisions January 2014. www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/gtg_31.pdf (accessed January 18, 2015).Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice bulletin no. 134: Fetal growth restriction. Obstet Gynecol 2013;121:1122–33.Google Scholar
Torrance, HL, Derks, JB, Scherjon, SA, Wijnberger, LD, Visser, GH. Is antenatal steroid treatment effective in preterm IUGR fetuses? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2009;88:1068–73.Google Scholar