Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-hbs24 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-11T23:09:03.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

17 - Asymmetrical prosodic effects on the laryngeal gesture in Korean

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2011

Sun-Ah Jun
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Bruce Connell
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Amalia Arvaniti
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Get access

Summary

Introduction

It is well established that prosody conditions segmental and suprasegmental features. In English, for example, segments are lengthened at the end of a phrase (e.g. Oiler, 1973; Beckman & Edwards, 1990), and the “gestural magnitude” of /h/ is weakened word medially or in deaccented words (Pierrehumbert & Talkin, 1992). Additionally, Keating, Linker & Huffman (1983) show that many languages have different allophones for voiced or voiceless stops depending on position within the word or the phrase. However, such effects are often not symmetrical with respect to the edges of a prosodic unit. For example, in German, voiced stops often become voiceless word initially as well as word finally, but this causes neutralization only word finally, where the contrasting voiceless stop is not aspirated.

Korean also has such prosodically conditioned strengthenings and weakenings of laryngeal features, and asymmetries between word initial and word final position. In syllable initial position, there is a three-way contrast among aspirated, tense, and lenis voiceless obstruents, but this contrast is preserved only in the initial position of a word in isolation. In word medial onset position, the lenis stops are voiced between sonorants. In syllable final position, the distinction is neutralized completely to an unreleased lenis stop. The weakening processes in word medial and syllable final position have been described by phonologists (e.g. Cho, 1987; Kim-Renaud, 1974; Kang, 1992) as Lenis Stop Voicing and Coda Neutralization, respectively.

Type
Chapter
Information
Phonology and Phonetic Evidence
Papers in Laboratory Phonology IV
, pp. 235 - 253
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×