Book contents
- Philosophy and the Language of the People
- Philosophy and the Language of the People
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Early Humanist Critics of Scholastic Language: Francesco Petrarch and Leonardo Bruni
- Chapter 2 From a Linguistic Point of View: Lorenzo Valla’s Critique of Aristotelian-Scholastic Philosophy
- Chapter 3 Giovanni Pontano on Language, Meaning, and Grammar
- Chapter 4 Juan Luis Vives on Language, Knowledge, and the Topics
- Chapter 5 Anti-Essentialism and the Rhetoricization of Knowledge: Mario Nizolio’s Humanist Attack on Universals
- Chapter 6 Skepticism and the Critique of Language in Francisco Sanches
- Chapter 7 Thomas Hobbes and the Rhetoric of Common Language
- Chapter 8 Between Private Signification and Common Use: Locke on Ideas, Words, and the Social Dimension of Language
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
Chapter 8 - Between Private Signification and Common Use: Locke on Ideas, Words, and the Social Dimension of Language
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 July 2021
- Philosophy and the Language of the People
- Philosophy and the Language of the People
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Early Humanist Critics of Scholastic Language: Francesco Petrarch and Leonardo Bruni
- Chapter 2 From a Linguistic Point of View: Lorenzo Valla’s Critique of Aristotelian-Scholastic Philosophy
- Chapter 3 Giovanni Pontano on Language, Meaning, and Grammar
- Chapter 4 Juan Luis Vives on Language, Knowledge, and the Topics
- Chapter 5 Anti-Essentialism and the Rhetoricization of Knowledge: Mario Nizolio’s Humanist Attack on Universals
- Chapter 6 Skepticism and the Critique of Language in Francisco Sanches
- Chapter 7 Thomas Hobbes and the Rhetoric of Common Language
- Chapter 8 Between Private Signification and Common Use: Locke on Ideas, Words, and the Social Dimension of Language
- Conclusion
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
This chapter studies Locke’s critique of scholastic language, but since this “learned gibberish” is, for Locke, only one form of insignificant speech, the chapter then proceeds to discuss his views about the requirements for significant speech and the remedies proposed in case these requirements are not met. Locke’s answer contains elements that, at first sight, cannot be reconciled with each other so easily: his linguistic thesis according to which words as arbitrary signs are imposed by the mind on its ideas has a mentalistic and even solipsistic ring to it, yet communication is a social activity, governed by rules, customs, and conventions. The chapter therefore ends by looking in more detail at the social dimension of language to see how the social world shapes our apparently private minds. It concludes that for Locke the mind is a social entity, embedded in social and linguistic practices that shape our views of the world and give expression to them. The social world is built on the ideas we receive and construct, and common linguistic usage, for all its imperfections, is essential in framing and conveying these ideas.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Philosophy and the Language of the PeopleThe Claims of Common Speech from Petrarch to Locke, pp. 215 - 244Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021