Book contents
- Petroleum and Progress in Iran
- Petroleum and Progress in Iran
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Acknowledgments
- Note on Transliteration
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I
- 1 Iran, Global Oil, and the United States, 1901–1947
- 2 “We Have Done Nothing”
- 3 The Mosaddeq Challenge
- 4 The Collapse Narrative
- Part II
- Bibliography
- Index
3 - The Mosaddeq Challenge
Nationalization and the Isolation of Iranian Oil, 1951–1952
from Part I
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 December 2022
- Petroleum and Progress in Iran
- Petroleum and Progress in Iran
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Acknowledgments
- Note on Transliteration
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I
- 1 Iran, Global Oil, and the United States, 1901–1947
- 2 “We Have Done Nothing”
- 3 The Mosaddeq Challenge
- 4 The Collapse Narrative
- Part II
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
In 1951, Mohammed Mosaddeq rose to power in Iran and nationalized the country’s British-owned oil industry. The nationalization triggered an international crisis as the British, together with major oil companies, placed an embargo on Iran, effectively de-integrating Iranian oil from the global oil market. Convinced that pressure on Mosaddeq would worsen Iran’s political instability and push the country toward communism, the United States attempted to broker a settlement that would produce a suitable definition of “nationalization,” satisfying Iranian nationalism while preserving the dominance of the oil oligopoly. Successive negotiations in 1951 and 1952 failed to produce a settlement. A myth of Iranian incapacity obscured the companies’ use of market power to isolate Iran while the United States helped redirect flows of oil to make up for Iran’s de-integration.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Petroleum and Progress in IranOil, Development, and the Cold War, pp. 86 - 117Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022