Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T16:53:49.868Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

II - Early Foundations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2021

Edited by
Mario L. Small ,
Brea L. Perry ,
Bernice Pescosolido  and
Edward B. Smith
Mario L. Small
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Brea L. Perry
Affiliation:
Indiana University, Bloomington
Bernice Pescosolido
Affiliation:
Indiana University, Bloomington
Edward B. Smith
Affiliation:
Northwestern University, Illinois
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Personal Networks
Classic Readings and New Directions in Egocentric Analysis
 , pp. 27 - 210
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bibliography

Blau, Peter M. 1964. Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York and London: Wiley.Google Scholar
Blau, Peter M. 1977. Inequality and Heterogeneity. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Breiger, Ronald. 1974. “The Duality of Persons and Groups.” Social Forces 53(2): 181–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, Ronald S. 2005. Brokerage and Closure. An Introduction to Social Capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Caplow, Theodore. 1956. “A Theory of Coalitions in the Triad.” American Sociological Review 21(4): 489–93.Google Scholar
Cartwright, Dorwin, and Harary, Frank. 1956. “Structural Balance: A Generalization of Heider’s Theory.” Psychological Review 63(5): 277–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coleman, James S. 1957. Community Conflict. Glencoe: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Collett, Jessica L. 2011. “(Re)Integrating Simmel in Contemporary Social Exchange: The Effect of Nonpartisans on Relational Outcomes.” Social Forces 90(2): 617–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coser, Lewis A. 1956. The Functions of Social Conflict. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Dahme, Heinz-Jürgen. 1981. Soziologie als exakte Wissenschaft. Georg Simmels Ansatz und seine Bedeutung in der gegenwärtigen Soziologie. 2 Vol. Stuttgart: Enke.Google Scholar
Davis, James A. 1967. “Clustering and Structural Balance in Graphs.” Human Relations 20(3): 181–7.Google Scholar
Faust, Katherine. 2010. “A Puzzle Concerning Triads in Social Networks: Graph Constraints and the Triad Census.” Social Networks 32(3): 221–33.Google Scholar
Feld, Scott L. 1981. “The Focused Organization of Social Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 86(5): 1015–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Claude S. 1982. To Dwell among Friends. Personal Networks in Town and City. Chicago, Il: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, Linton C. 2004. The Development of Social Network Analysis. A Study in the Sociology of Science. Vancouver, BC: Empirical Press.Google Scholar
Frisby, David. [1984] 2002. Georg Simmel. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Häussling, Roger. 2010. “Formale Soziologie,” pp. 241–55 in Handbuch Netzwerkforschung, edited by Stegbauer, C. and Häussling, R.. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
Heider, Fritz. 1946. “Attitudes and Cognitive Organization.” Journal of Psychology 21(1): 107–12.Google Scholar
Hollstein, Betina. 2001. Grenzen sozialer Integration. Zur Konzeption informeller Beziehungen und Netzwerke. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollstein, Betina. 2002. Soziale Netzwerke nach der Verwitwung. Eine Rekonstruktion der Veränderungen informeller Beziehungen. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.Google Scholar
Homans, George C. 1958. “Social Behavior as Exchange.” American Journal of Sociology 63(6): 597–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homans, George C. 1961. Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Kadushin, Charles. 1966. “Friends and Supporters of Psychotherapy: On Social Circles in Urban Life.” American Sociological Review 31(6): 786–802.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kadushin, Charles. 2012. Understanding Social Networks. Theories, Concepts, and Findings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Krackhardt, David. 1998. “Simmelian Ties: Super Strong and Sticky,” pp. 21–38 in Power and Influence in Organizations, edited by Kramer, R. and Neale, M.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laumann, Edward O. 1973. Bonds of Pluralism: The Form and Substance of Urban Social Networks. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Levine, Donald N., ed. 1971. Georg Simmel: On Individuality and Social Forms: Selected Writings. Reprint. Chicago, IL and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Levine, Donald N. 1989. “Simmel as a Resource for Sociological Metatheory.” Sociological Theory 7(2): 161–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, Donald N., Carter, Ellwood B., and Gorman, Eleanor Miller. 1976a. “Simmel’s Influence on American Sociology. I.” The American Journal of Sociology 81(4): 813–45.Google Scholar
Levine, Donald N., Carter, Ellwood B., and Gorman, Eleanor Miller. 1976b. “Simmel’s Influence on American Sociology. II.”. American Journal of Sociology 81(5): 1112–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, J. Miller, and Ranger-Moore, James R.. 1991. “Evolution on a Dancing Landscape: Organizations and Networks in Dynamic Blau Space.” Social Forces 70(1): 19–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, Theodore. 1953. “Power Relations in Three-Person Groups.” American Sociological Review 18(4): 351–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obstfeld, David. 2005. “Social Networks, the Tertius Iungens Orientation, and Involvement in Innovation.” Administrative Science Quarterly 50(1): 100–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Robert E., and Burgess, Ernest W.. 1921. Introduction to the Science of Sociology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pescosolido, Bernice, and Rubin, Beth A.. 2000. “The Web of Group Affiliations Revisited: Social Life, Postmodernism, and Sociology.” American Sociological Review 65(1): 52–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmel, Georg. 1902a. “The Number of Members as Determining the Sociological Form of the Group. I.” American Journal of Sociology 8(1): 1–46.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg. 1902b. “The Number of Members as Determining the Sociological Form of the Group. II.” American Journal of Sociology 8(2): 158–96.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg. 1908. Soziologie. Untersuchungen über die Formen der Vergesellschaftung. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg. 1955. Conflict and The Web of Group-Affiliations. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg. 1997. Simmel on Culture: Selected Writings. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg. 2009. Sociology. Inquiries into the Construction of Social Forms. Translated and edited by Blasi, Anthony J., Jacobs, Anton K., and Kanjirathinkal, Mathew. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Small, Mario L., and Adler, Laura. 2019. “The Role of Space in the Formation of Social Ties.” Annual Review of Sociology 45: 111–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Wiese, Leopold. 1924/1929. Allgemeine Soziologie als Lehre von den Beziehungen und Beziehungsgebilden der Menschen. 2 Vol. München: Duncker & Humblot.Google Scholar
Walter, E. V. 1959. “Simmel’s Sociology of Power: The Architecture of Politics,” pp. 139–67, in Essays on Sociology, Philosophy and Aesthetics edited by Wolff, Kurt H.. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Warner, W. Lloyd, and Lunt, Paul S.. 1941. The Social Life of a Modern Community. New Haven, CT: Yale University.Google Scholar
Wellman, Barry. 1979. “The Community Question: The Intimate Networks of East Yorkers.” American Journal of Sociology 84(5): 1201–31.Google Scholar
Wolff, Kurt H. 1950. “Introduction,” pp. xvii–lxiv in The Sociology of Georg Simmel, by Simmel, Georg, edited and translated by Wolff, Kurt H.. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Yoon, Jeongkoo, Thye, Shane R., and Lawler, Edward J.. 2013. “Exchange and Cohesion in Dyads and Triads: A Test of Simmel’s Hypothesis.” Social Science Research 42(6): 1457–66.Google Scholar

References

Inkeles, Alex. 1950. Public Opinion in Soviet Russia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lazersfeld, Paul. 1941. “Audience Building in Educational Broadcasting.” Journal of Educational Sociology 14(9): 533–41.Google Scholar
Lazersfeld, Paul. 1942. “The Effects of Radio on Public Opinion,” in Print, Radio and Film in a Democracy, edited by Waples, Douglas. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Berelson, Bernard, and Gaudet, Hazel. 1948. The People’s Choice. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Riley, Matilda White, and Riley, John W. Jr. 1951. “A sociological approach to communications research.” Public Opinion Quarterly 15(3): 445–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shils, Edward, and Janowitz, Morris. 1948. “Cohesion and Disintegration in the Wehrmacht.” Public Opinion Quarterly 12: 300–15.Google Scholar
Suchman, Edward. 1941. “An Invitation to Music,” in Radio Research, edited by Lazarsfeld, P. F. and Stanton, F.. New York: Duell, Sloan, and Pearce.Google Scholar
Wiebe, G. D. 1951. “Merchandising Commodities and Citizenship on Television.” Public Opinion Quarterly 15: 679–91.Google Scholar
Wiebe, G. D. 1952. “Responses to the Televised Kefauver Hearings.” Public Opinion Quarterly 16: 179–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Ancona, Deborah G., and Caldwell, David. 1992. “Bridging the Boundary: External Activity and Performance in Organizational Teams.” Administrative Science Quarterly 37: 634–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakshy, Etan, et al. 2009. “Social Influence and the Diffusion of User-Created Content.” In Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 325–34. New York: Association of Computing Machinery.Google Scholar
Barberá, Pablo et al. 2015. “The Critical Periphery in the Growth of Social Protests.” PLoS ONE 10(11): e0143611.Google Scholar
Beaman, Lori, et al. 2016. “Making Networks Work for Policy: Evidence from Agricultural Technology Adoption in Malawi.” Impact Evaluation Report 43. New Delhi: International Initiative for Impact Evaluation.Google Scholar
Becker, Joshua, et al. 2017. “Network Dynamics of Social Influence in the Wisdom of Crowds.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114(26): E5070–6.Google Scholar
Becker, Joshua, et al. 2019. “The Wisdom of Partisan Crowds.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116(22): 10717–22.Google Scholar
Blankenship, Elizabeth B., et al. 2018. “Sentiment, Contents, and Retweets: A Study of Two Vaccine-Related Twitter Datasets.” The Permanente Journal 22: 17–138.Google Scholar
Broniatowski, David, et al. 2018. “Weaponized Health Communication: Twitter Bots and Russian Trolls Amplify the Vaccine Debate.” American Journal of Public Health 108(10):1378–84.Google Scholar
Burt, Ronald S. 1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Centola, Damon. 2010. “The Spread of Behavior in an Online Social Network Experiment.” Science 329(5996): 1194–7.Google Scholar
Centola, Damon. 2011. “An Experimental Study of Homophily in the Adoption of Health Behavior.” Science 334(6060): 1269–72.Google Scholar
Centola, Damon. 2015. “The Social Origins of Networks and Diffusion.” American Journal of Sociology 120(5): 1295–338.Google Scholar
Centola, Damon. 2018. How Behavior Spreads. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Centola, Damon. 2019. “Influential Networks.” Nature Human Behavior 3: 1–2.Google ScholarPubMed
Centola, Damon. 2021. Change: How to Make Big Things Happen. New York: Little Brown, Spark.Google Scholar
Centola, Damon, and Arnout, van de Rijt. 2015. “Choosing Your Network: Social Preferences in an Online Health Community.” Social Science & Medicine 125: 19–31.Google Scholar
Centola, Damon, and Macy, Michael. 2007. “Complex Contagions and the Weakness of Long Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 113(3): 702–34.Google Scholar
Centola, Damon, et al. 2007. “Cascade Dynamics of Multiplex Propagation.” Physica A 374: 449–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Centola, Damon, et al. 2018. “Experimental Evidence for Tipping Points in Social Convention.” Science 360(6393): 1116–19.Google Scholar
Davis, Gerald, and Greve, Henrich R.. 1997. “Corporate Elite Networks and Governance Changes in the 1980s.” The American Journal of Sociology 103(1): 1–37.Google Scholar
Gladwell, Malcolm. 2000. The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 78(6): 1360–80.Google Scholar
Guilbeault, Douglas, and Centola, Damon. 2020a. “Optimal Seeding Strategies for Social Contagions.” Working Paper, Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Guilbeault, Douglas, and Centola, Damon. 2020b. “Networked Collective Intelligence Improves Dissemination of Scientific Information Regarding Smoking Risks.” PLoS ONE 15(2): e0227813.Google Scholar
Guilbeault, Douglas, et al. 2018a. “Complex Contagions: A Decade in Review.” In Complex Spreading Phenomena in Social Systems, edited by Ahn, Yong Yeol and Lehmann, Sune. New York: Springer Nature.Google Scholar
Guilbeault, Douglas, et al. 2018b. “Social Learning and Partisan Bias in the Interpretation of Climate Trends.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115(39): 9714–19.Google Scholar
Hansen, Morten T. 1999. “The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits.” Administrative Science Quarterly 44(1): 82–111.Google Scholar
Howe, Lauren, and Monin, Benoît. 2017. “Healthier than Thou? ‘Practicing What You Preach’ Backfires by Increasing Anticipated Devaluation.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 112(5): 735.Google Scholar
Kanter, Rosabeth Moss. 1977. Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Karsai, Márton, et al. 2016. “Local Cascades Induced Global Contagion: How Heterogeneous Thresholds, Exogenous Effects, and Unconcerned Behaviour Govern Online Adoption Spreading.” Scientific Reports 2016: 27178.Google Scholar
Katz, Elihu. 1957. “The Two-Step Flow of Communication: An Up-to-Date Report on an Hypothesis.” Public Opinion Quarterly 21: 61–78.Google Scholar
Katz, Elihu, and Lazarsfeld, Paul. 1955. Personal Influence. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Bernice R., et al. 2007. “African Americans and Their Distrust of the Health Care System: Healthcare for Diverse Populations.” Journal of Cultural Diversity 14(2): 56–60.Google Scholar
Kluchin, Rebecca. 2009. Fit to Be Tied: Sterilization and Reproductive Rights in America, 1950–1980. Rutgers: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Krackhardt, David. 1999. “The Ties that Torture: Simmelian Tie Analysis in Organizations.” Research in the Sociology of Organizations 16(1): 183–210.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, Paul F., and Merton, Robert K.. 1954. “Friendship as a Social Process: A Substantive and Methodological Analysis.” Freedom and Control in Modern Society 18: 18–66.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, Paul, et al. 1944. The People’s Choice. New York: Duell, Sloan & Pearce.Google Scholar
Mønsted, Bjarke, et al. 2017. “Evidence of Complex Contagion of Information in Social Media: An Experiment Using Twitter Bots.” PLoS ONE 12(9): e0184148.Google Scholar
Newman, Mark. 2010. Networks: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Padgett, John F., and Ansell, Christopher K.. 1993. “Robust Action and the Rise of the Medici, 1400–1434.” American Journal of Sociology 98(6): 1259–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, Scott E. 2007. The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Reagans, Ray, and Bill, McEvily. 2003. “Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range.” Administrative Science Quarterly 48(2): 240–67.Google Scholar
Romero, Daniel, et al. 2011. “Differences in the Mechanics of Information Diffusion across Topics: Idioms, Political Hashtags, and Complex Contagion on Twitter.” In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 695–704. New York: Association of Computing Machinery.Google Scholar
Samuelson, William, and Zeckhauser, Richard. 1988. “Status Quo Bias in Decision Making.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1: 7–59.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg. 1955. Conflict and the Web of Group Affiliations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Sprague, Daniel, and House, Thomas. 2017. “Evidence for Complex Contagion Models of Social Contagion from Observational Data.” PLoS ONE 12(7): e0180802.Google Scholar
State, Bogdan, and Lada Adamic. 2015. “The Diffusion of Support in an Online Social Movement: Evidence from the Adoption of Equal-Sign Profile Pictures.” In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 1741–1750. New York: Association of Computing Machinery.Google Scholar
Steinert-Threlkeld, Zachary C. 2017. “Spontaneous Collective Action: Peripheral Mobilization during the Arab Spring.” American Political Science Review 111(2): 379–403.Google Scholar
Toole, Jameson L. et al. 2012. “Modeling the Adoption of Innovations in the Presence of Geographic and Media Influences.” Plos One 7(1): e29528.Google Scholar
Traag, Vincent. 2016. “Complex Contagion of Campaign Donations.” PLoS One 11(4): e0153539.Google Scholar
Ugander, Johan, et al. 2012. “Structural Diversity in Social Contagion.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109(16): 5962–6.Google Scholar
Vaan, Mathijs de, Vedres, Balazs, and Stark, David. 2015. “Game Changer: The Topology of Creativity.” American Journal of Sociology 120(4): 1144–94.Google Scholar
Wang, Xioachen, et al. 2019. “Anomalous Structure and Dynamics in News Diffusion among Heterogeneous Individuals.” Nature Human Behavior 3: 1–10.Google Scholar
Zhang, Jingwen, and Centola, Damon. 2019. “Social Networks and Health: New Developments in Diffusion, Online and Offline.” Annual Review of Sociology 45(1): 91–109.Google Scholar

References

Aldous, Joan, and Straus, Murray A.. 1966. “Social Networks and Conjugal Roles: A Test of Bott’s Hypothesis.” Social Forces 44: 577–80.Google Scholar
Barnes, John A. 1954. “Class and Committee in a Norwegian Island Parish.” Human Relations 7: 39–58.Google Scholar
Beshers, James, and Laumann, Edward. 1967. “Social Distance: A Network Approach.” American Sociological Review 32: 141–5.Google Scholar
Bott, Elizabeth. 1955. “Urban Families: Conjugal Roles and Social Networks.” Human Relations 8: 345–85.Google Scholar
Bott, Elizabeth. 1956. “Urban Families: The Norms of Conjugal Roles.” Human Relations 9: 325–41.Google Scholar
Bott, Elizabeth. 1957. Family and Social Networks. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
Cartwright, Dorwin, and Zander, Alvin, (eds.). 1960. Group Dynamics: Research and Theory, 2nd ed. Evanston, IL: Row Peterson.Google Scholar
Coleman, James, Katz, Elihu, and Menzel, Herbert. 1957. “The Diffusion of an Innovation among Physicians.” Sociometry 20: 253–70.Google Scholar
Epstein, Arnold L. 1961. “The Network and Urban Social Organization.” Rhodes-Livingstone Journal 29: 29–62.Google Scholar
Festinger, Leon, Schachter, Stanley, and Back, Kurt. 1950. Social Pressures in Informal Groups. New Yorker: Harper.Google Scholar
Firth, Raymond. 1954. “Social Organization and Social Change.” Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 84: 1–20.Google Scholar
Harary, Frank, Norman, Robert Z., and Cartwright, Dorwin. 1965. Structural Models: An Introduction to the Theory of Directed Graphs. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Jay, Edward J. 1964. “The Concepts of ‘Field’ and ‘Network’ in Anthropological Research.” Man 64: 137–9.Google Scholar
Katz, Fred E. 1966. “Occupation Contact Network.” Social Forces 28: 237–52.Google Scholar
Loomis, Charles P. 1967. “Change in Rural India as Related to Social Power and Sex.” Behavioral Sciences and Community Development 1: 1–27.Google Scholar
Loomis, Charles P., Morales, J. O., Clifford, R. A., and Leonard., O. E. 1953. Turrialba: Social Systems and the Introduction of Change. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Mayer, Adrian. 1966. “The Significance of Quasi-Groups in the Study of Complex Societies,” pp. 97–122 in The Social Anthropology of Complex Societies, ASA Monographs 4, edited by Banton, M.. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
Mayer, Philip. 1961. Tribesmen or Townsmen: Conservatism and the Process of Urbanization in a South African City. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mayer, Philip. 1962. “Migrancy and the Study of Africans in Towns.” American Anthropologist 64(3): 576–92.Google Scholar
Mayer, Philip. 1964. “Labour Migrancy and the Social Network.” In Problems of Transition: Proceedings of the Social Sciences Research Conference, vol. 1962, pp. 21–34.Google Scholar
Mitchell, James C. 1959. “The Study of African Urban Social Structures.” Presented at Housing and Urbanization Inter-African Conference, 2nd Session. Nairobi: Publication No. 47, CCTA.Google Scholar
Nelson, Joel I. 1966. “Clique contacts and family orientations.” American Sociological Review 31: 663–672.Google Scholar
Pauw, Berthold A. 1963. The Second Generation. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Radcliffe-Brown, Alfred R. 1952. Structure and Function in Primitive Society: Essays and Addresses. London: Cohen and West.Google Scholar
Reader, D. H. 1964. “Models in Social Change with Special Reference to Southern Africa.” African Studies 23: 11–33.Google Scholar
Turner, Christopher. 1967. “Conjugal roles and social networks: A re-examination of an hypothesis.” Human Relations 20(2): 121–130.Google Scholar
Udry, J. Richard, and Hall, Mary. 1965. “Marital Role Segregation and Social Networks in Middle-Class, Middle-Aged Couples.” Journal of Marriage and Family Living 27(3): 392–5.Google Scholar
van Velsen, Jaap. 1964. The Politics of Kinship. Manchester: Manchester University Press for the Rhodes-Livingstone Institute.Google Scholar
van Velsen, Jaap. 1967. “The Extended Case Method and Situational Analysis,” pp. 129–49 in The Craft of Social Anthropology, edited by Epstein, A. L.. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar

References

Ahuja, G., Soda, G., and Zaheer, A. 2012. “The Genesis and Dynamics of Organizational Networks.” Organization Science 23(2): 434–48.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. A. 1954. “Class and Committees in a Norwegian Island Parish.” Human Relations 7: 39–58.Google Scholar
Boissevain, J. 1973. “An Exploration of Two First Order Zones,” in Network Analysis. Studies in Human Interaction, edited by Boissevain, J. and Mitchell, J. C.. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Borgatti, S. P. 2006. “Identifying Sets of Key Players in a Social Network.” Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory 12(1): 21–34.Google Scholar
Borgatti, S. P., Brass, D. J., and Halgin, D. S. 2014. “Social Network Research: Confusions, Criticisms, and Controversies.” Research in the Sociology of Organizations 40: 1–29.Google Scholar
Borgatti, S. P., and Everett, M. G. 2006. “A Graph-Theoretic Perspective on Centrality.” Social Networks 28: 466–84.Google Scholar
Borgatti, S. P., and Foster, P. C. 2003. “The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research: A Review and Typology.” Journal of Management 29(6): 991–1013.Google Scholar
Borgatti, S. P., and Halgin, D. S. 2011. “On Network Theory.” Organization Science 22(5): 1168–81.Google Scholar
Bott, E. 1957. Family and Social Network. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
Brennecke, J. 2019. “Dissonant Ties in Intraorganizational Networks: Why Individuals Seek Problem-Solving Assistance from Difficult Colleagues.” Academy of Management Journal. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.0399Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. 1983. Corporate Profits and Cooptation: Networks of Market Constraints and Directorate Ties in the American Economy. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. 1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S., and Merluzzi, J. 2016. “Network Oscillation.” Academy of Management Discoveries 2(4): 368–91.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. 1988. “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital.” American Journal of Sociology 94: S95–S120.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. 1994. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Corona, V. P., and Godart, F. C. 2010. “Network-Domains in Combat and Fashion Organizations.” Organization 17(2): 283–304.Google Scholar
Cross, R., Borgatti, S. P., and Parker, A. 2002. “Making Invisible Work Visible: Using Social Network Analysis to Support Strategic Collaboration.” California Management Review 44(2): 25–46.Google Scholar
Fine, G. A. 1992. Manufacturing Tales: Sex and Money in Contemporary Legends. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
Friedkin, N. E., and Johnsen, E. C. 1990. “Social Influence and Opinions.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology 15(3–4): 193–206.Google Scholar
Fulghum, R. 1988. All I Really Need to Know I Learned in Kindergarten. New York: Villard Books.Google Scholar
Furlotti, M., and Soda, G. 2018. “Fit for the Task: Complementarity, Asymmetry, and Partner Selection in Alliances.” Organization Science 29(5): 837–54.Google Scholar
Godart, F. C., and White, H. C. 2010. “Switchings under Uncertainty: The Coming and Becoming of Meanings.” Poetics 38: 567–86.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. S. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 6: 1360–80.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. S. 1985. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.” American Journal of Sociology 91(3): 481–510.Google Scholar
Groenewegen, P., Ferguson, J. E., Moser, C., Mohr, J., and Borgatti, S. P. 2017. Structure, Content and Meaning of Organizational Networks: Extending Network Thinking. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.Google Scholar
Katz, F. E. 1966. “Social Participation and Social Structure.” Social Forces 45(2): 199–210.Google Scholar
Knoke, D., Pappi, F. U., Broadbent, J., and Tsujinaka, Y. 1996. Comparing Policy Networks: Labor Politics in the US, Germany, and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krackhardt, D., and Hanson, J. R., 1993. “Informal Networks.” Harvard Business Review 71(4): 104–11.Google Scholar
Levin, D. Z., and Walter, J. 2018. “Is Tie Maintenance Even Necessary?” Academy of Management Discoveries 4: 497–500.Google Scholar
Levin, D. Z., Walter, J., and Murnighan, J. K. 2011. “Dormant Ties: The Value of Reconnecting.” Organization Science 22(4): 923–39.Google Scholar
Mayer, A. C. 1966. “The Significance of Quasi-Groups in the Study of Complex Societies,” in The Social Anthropology of Complex Societies, edited by M. Blanton. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
Methot, J. R., and Rosado-Solomon, E. 2020. “Multiplex Relationships in Organizations,” in Social Networks at Work, edited by D. Brass and S. Borgatti. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mische, A., and White, H. 1998. “Between Conversation and Situation: Public Switching Dynamics across Network Domains.” Social Research 65(3): 695–724.Google Scholar
Mitchell, J. C. 1969. “The Concept and Use of Social Networks,” in Social Networks in Urban Situations, edited by Mitchell, J. C.. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Molina, J. L. 2018. “Egocentric Analysis. Foundations, Methods, and Models.” Redes. Revista Hispana para el Análisis de Redes Sociales 29(2): 303–6.Google Scholar
Nadel, S. F. 1957. The Theory of Social Structure. London: Cohen and West.Google Scholar
Nadler, A. 1991. “Help-Seeking Behavior: Psychological Costs and Instrumental Benefits,” pp. 290–311 in Prosocial Behavior: Review of Personality and Social Psychology, edited by Clark, M. S.. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Parker, A., Halgin, D. S., and Borgatti, S. P. 2016. “Dynamics of Social Capital: Effects of Performance Feedback on Network Change.” Organization Studies 37(3): 375–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, B. L., Pescosolido, B. A., and Borgatti, S. P. 2018. Egocentric Network Analysis: Foundations, Methods, and Models, vol. 44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Quintane, E., and Carnabuci, G. 2016. “How Do Brokers Broker? Tertius Gaudens, Tertius Iungens, and the Temporality of Structural Holes.” Organization Science 27(6): 1343–60.Google Scholar
Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. 1952. Structure and Function in Primitive Society. Glendale, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Reagans, R., and McEvily, B. 2003. “Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range.” Administrative Science Quarterly 48(2): 240–67.Google Scholar
Rosnow, R. L., and Fine, G. A. 1976. Rumor and Gossip: The Social Psychology of Hearsay. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Sasovova, Z., Mehra, A., Borgatti, S. P., and Schippers, M. C. 2010. “Network Churn: The Effects of Self-Monitoring Personality on Brokerage Dynamics.” Administrative Science Quarterly 55(4): 639–70.Google Scholar
Smith, E. B., Menon, T., and Thompson, L. 2012. “Status Differences in the Cognitive Activation of Social Networks.” Organization Science 23(1): 67–82.Google Scholar
Srinivas, M. N., and Beteille, A. 1964. “Networks in Indian Social Structure.” Man 64(212): 165–8.Google Scholar
Wellman, B. 1988. “Structural Analysis: From Method and Metaphor to Theory and Substance,” in Social Structures: A Network Approach, edited by Wellman, B. and Berkowitz, S. D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wheeldon, P. D. 1969. “The Operation of Voluntary Associations and Personal Networks in the Political Processes of Inter-Ethnic Community,” in Social Networks in Urban Situations, edited by Mitchell, J. C.. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Young, M., and Wilmott, P. 1957. Family and Kinship in East London. Harmondsworth: Penguin books.Google Scholar

References

Abbott, Andrew. 2001. Time Matters. On Theory and Method. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Bidart, Claire, and Charbonneau, Johanne. 2011. “How to Generate Personal Networks: Issues and Tools for a Sociological Perspective.” Field Methods 23(3): 266–86.Google Scholar
Bidart, Claire, Degenne, Alain, and Grossetti, Michel. 2017. “Personal Networks Typologies: A Structural Approach.” Social Networks 54: 1–11.Google Scholar
Bidart, Claire, Degenne, Alain, and Grossetti, Michel. 2020. Life in Networks: The Dynamics of Social Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bott, Elizabeth. 1971 [1957]. Family and Social Network:. Roles, Norms, and External Relationships in Ordinary Urban Families. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Bott, Elizabeth. 1955. “Urban Families: Conjugal Roles and Social Networks.” Human Relations 8: 345–384.Google Scholar
Burt, Ronald S. 1992. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Feld, Scott L. 1981. “The Focused Organization of Social Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 86(5): 1015–35.Google Scholar
Fischer, Claude. 1982. To Dwell Among Friends. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, Linton C. 1978. “Centrality in Social Networks Conceptual Clarification.” Social Networks 1: 215–39.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
Granovetter, Mark S. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” The American Journal of Sociology 78: 1360–80.Google Scholar
Harrell-Bond, Barbara. 1969. “Conjugal Role Behaviour”. Human Relations 22(1): 77–91.Google Scholar
Kalmijn, Matthijs. 2003. “Shared Friendship Networks and the Life Course: An Analysis of Survey Data on Married and Cohabiting Couples.” Social Networks 25: 231–49.Google Scholar
Kapferer, Bruce. 1973. “Social Network and Conjugal Role in Urban Zambia: Towards a Reformulation of the Bott Hypothesis,” in Network Analysis: Studies in Human Interaction, edited by Boissevain, Jeremy and Mitchell, J. Clyde. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Kennedy, David P., Jackson, Grace L., Green, Harold D., Bradbury, Thomas N., and Karney, Benjamin R.. 2015. “The Analysis of Duocentric Social Networks: A Primer.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 77: 295–311.Google Scholar
Bernard, Lahire. 2011. The Plural Actor. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Milardo, Robert. 1982. “Friendship Networks in Developing Relationships: Converging and Diverging Social Environments.” Social Psychology Quarterly 45(3): 162–72.Google Scholar
Milardo, Robert. 1989. “Theoretical and Methodological Issues in the Identification of the Social Networks of Spouses.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 51: 165–74.Google Scholar
Milardo, Robert, and Allan, Graham. 1979. “Social Networks and Marital Relationships,” in Handbook of Personal Relationships, edited by Duck, Steve. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Rözer, Jesper J., Mollenhorst, Gerald, and Völker, Beate. 2014. “Romantic Relationship Formation, Maintenance and Changes in Personal Networks.” Advances in Life Course Research 23: 86–97.Google Scholar
Savage, Mike. 2008. “Elizabeth Bott and the Formation of Modern British Sociology.” The Sociological Review 56(4): 579–605.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg. 1950. The Sociology of Georg Simmel, edited and translated by Wolff, Kurt H.. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Small, Mario L. 2017. Someone to Talk To. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Swidler, Ann. 2001. Talk of Love. How Culture Matters. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Turner, Christopher. 1967. “Conjugal Roles and Social Networks: A Re-examination of a Hypothesis.” Human Relations 20(2): 121–30.Google Scholar
Vacca, Raffaele. 2020. “Structure in Personal Networks: Constructing and Comparing Typologies.” Network Science 8(2): 142–67.Google Scholar
Eric, Widmer, Kellerhals, Jean, and René, Lévy. 2004. “Types of Conjugal Networks, Conjugal Conflict and Conjugal Quality.” European Sociological Review 20(1): 63–77.Google Scholar

References

Festinger, Leon, Cartwright, Dorwin, Barber, Kathleen, Fleischl, Juliet, Gottsdanker, Josephine, Keysen, Annette, and Leavitt, Gloria. 1948. “The Study of a Rumor: Its Origin and Spread.” Human Relations 1: 464–86.Google Scholar

References

Ash, Mitchell G. 1996. Gestalt Psychology in German Culture 1890–1967. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bailey, Michael, Farrell, Patrick, Kuchler, Theresa, and Stroebel, Johannes. 2019. “Social Connectedness in Urban Areas.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper #26029. doi: 10.3386/w26029.Google Scholar
Bales, Robert F. 1950. Interaction Process Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Blau, Peter M. 1977. Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Butts, Carter T., Acton, Ryan M., Hipp, John R., Nagle, Nicholas N.. 2012. “Geographical Variability and Network Structure.” Social Networks 34: 82–100.Google Scholar
Cartwright, Dorian. 1968. “The Nature of Group Cohesiveness.” Group Dynamics: Research and Theory 91: 109.Google Scholar
Cooley, Charles Horton. 1909. Social Organization: A Study of the Larger Mind. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile. 1984 [1893]. The Division of Labor in Society, translated by Halls, W. D.. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Emile. 1951 [1897]. Suicide, translated by John A. Spaulding and George Simpson. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Emirbayer, Mustafa. 1997. “Manifesto for a Relational Sociology.” American Journal of Sociology 103: 281–317.Google Scholar
Festinger, Leon. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Festinger, Leon, Riecken, Henry W., and Schachter, Stanley. 1956. When Prophecy Fails. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, Claude S. 1994. America Calling: A Social History of the Telephone to 1940. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Fischer, Claude S., and Stueve, C. Ann. 1977. “‘Authentic Community’: The Role of Place in Modern Life,” pp. 163–86 in Networks and Places, edited by Fischer, Claude. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Flache, Andreas, and Macy, Michael W.. 1997. “The Weakness of Strong Ties: Collective Action Failure in a Highly Cohesive Group,” in Evolution of Social Networks, edited by Doreian, P. and Stokman, F. N.. Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach.Google Scholar
Frank, Kenneth A. 1996. “Mapping Interactions within and between Cohesive Subgroups.” Social Networks 18(2): 93–119.Google Scholar
Friedkin, Noah E. 1998. A Structural Theory of Social Influence. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Friedkin, Noah E. 2004. “Social Cohesion.” Annual Review of Sociology 30: 409–25.Google Scholar
Gibson, James J. 1986 [1979]. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Goel, Sharad, Anderson, Ashton, Hofman, Jake and Watts, Duncan J.. 2016. “The Structural Virality of Online Diffusion.” Management Science 62(1): 180–96.Google Scholar
Habinek, Jacob, Martin, John Levi, and Zablocki, Benjamin. 2015. “Double-Embeddedness: Spatial and Relational Contexts of Tie Persistence and Re-Formation.” Social Networks 42: 27–41.Google Scholar
Hogg, M. A. 1992. The Social Psychology of Group Cohesiveness: From Attraction to Social Identity. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Homans, George C. 1950. The Human Group. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Company.Google Scholar
Lott, Bernice E. 1961. “Group Cohesiveness: A Learning Phenomenon.” The Journal of Social Psychology 55(2): 275–86.Google Scholar
Markovsky, Barry, and Lawler, Edward J.. 1994. “A New Theory of Social Solidarity,” pp. 113–37 in Advances in Group Processes, vol. 11, edited by Markovsky, B., O’Brien, J., and Heimer, K.. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Martin, John Levi. 1998. “Structures of Power in Naturally Occurring Communities.” Social Networks 20: 197–225.Google Scholar
Martin, John Levi. 2009. Social Structures. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McPherson, Miller. 1983. “An Ecology of Affiliation.”American Sociological Review 519–32.Google Scholar
McPherson, Miller, and Smith-Lovin, Lynn. 2002. “Cohesion and Membership Duration: Linking Groups, Relations and Individuals in an Ecology of Affiliation,” pp. 1–36 in Advances in Group Processes, vol. 19. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
Mok, Diana, Carrasco, Juan-Antonio, and Wellman, Barry. 2010. “Does Distance Still Matter in the Age of the Internet?” Urban Studies 47: 2747–83.Google Scholar
Mok, Diana, Wellman, Barry, and Basu, Ranu. 2007. “Did Distance Matter before the Internet? Interpersonal Contact and Support in the 1970s.” Social Networks 29: 430–61.Google Scholar
Montgomery, James D. 1991. “Social Networks and Labor-Market Outcomes: Toward an Economic Analysis.” American Economic Review 81: 1408–18.Google Scholar
Moody, James, and White, Douglas R. 2003. “Structural Cohesion and Embeddedness: A Hierarchical Concept of Social Groups.” American Sociological Review 103: 127.Google Scholar
Palmer, Susan J. 1994. Moon Sisters, Krishna Mothers, Rajneesh Lovers. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Patnoe, Shelley. 1988. A Narrative History of Experimental Social Psychology: The Lewin Tradition. New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Podolny, Joel M. 2001. “Networks as the Pipes and Prisms of the Market.” American Journal of Sociology 107(1): 33–60Google Scholar
Preciado, Paulina, Tom, A. B. Snijders, William J. Burk, Håkan Stattin, and Kerr, Margaret. 2012. “Does Proximity Matter? Distance Dependence of Adolescent Friendships.” Social Networks 34: 18–31.Google Scholar
Rokeach, Milton. 1964. The Three Christs of Ypsilanti. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Rokeach, Milton. 1968. Beliefs, Attitudes and Values: A Theory of Organization and Change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Ryan, Dan. 2006. “Getting the Word Out: Notes on the Social Organization of Notification.” Sociological Theory 24(3): 228–54.Google Scholar
Sigelman, Lee, Bledsoe, Timothy, Welch, Susan, and Combs, Michael W.. 1996. “Making Contact? Black-White Social Interaction in an Urban Setting.” American Journal of Sociology 101(5): 1306–32.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg. 1950. The Sociology of Georg Simmel, edited and translated by Wolff, Kurt H.. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Small, Mario L., and Adler, Laura. 2019. “The Role of Space in the Formation of Social Ties.” Annual Review of Sociology 45: 111–32.Google Scholar
Spiro, Emma S., Almquist, Zack W., and Butts, Carter T.. 2016. “The Persistence of Division: Geography, Institutions, and Online Friendship Ties.” Socius 2: 1–15. Doi: 10.1177/2378023116634340.Google Scholar
Zhao, Dingxin. 1998. “Ecologies of Social Movements: Student Mobilization during the 1989 Prodemocracy Movement in Beijing.” American Journal of Sociology 103(6): 1493–529.Google Scholar

References

Bernard, H. Russell, and Killworth, Peter D.. 1977. “Informant Accuracy in Social Network Data, II.” Human Communication Research 4: 3–18.Google Scholar
Bernard, H. Russell, Killworth, Peter D., and Sailer, Lee. 1980. “Informant Accuracy in Social Network Data, IV. A Comparison of Clique-Level Structure in Behavioral and Cognitive Data.” Social Networks 2: 191–218.Google Scholar
Bernard, H. Russell, Killworth, Peter D., and Sailer, Lee. 1981. “A Review of Informant Accuracy in Social Network Data” in Madelle fur Ausbreitungsprozesse in socialen Strukturen, edited by Hummell, H. J. and Sodeur, W.. Duisberg: Sozialwissenschaftlichen Kooperative.Google Scholar
Bernard, H. Russell, Killworth, Peter D., and Sailer, Lee. 1982. “Informant Accuracy in Social Network Data, V. An Experimental Attempt to Predict Actual Communication from Recall Data.” Social Science Research 11: 30–66.Google Scholar
Boster, James. 1983. “Requiem for the Omniscient Informant: There’s Life in the Old Girl Yet,” in Directions in Cognitive Anthropology edited by Dougherty, J.. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Cancian, Frank. 1963. “Informant Error and Native Prestige Ranking in Zinacantan.” American Anthropologist 65(5): 1068–75.Google Scholar
D’Andrade, Roy G. 1965. “Trait Psychology and Componential Analysis.” American Anthropologist 67(5): 215–28.Google Scholar
D’Andrade, Roy G. 1973. “Cultural Constructions of Reality,” pp. 115–27 in Cultural Illness and Health, edited by Nader, L. and Maretzky, T. W.. Washington, DC: American Anthropological Association.Google Scholar
D’Andrade, Roy G. 1974. “Memory and the Assessment of Behavior,” pp. 159–86 in Measurement in the Social Sciences, edited by Blalock, H. M. Jr. Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
Deutscher, Irwin. 1973. What We Say/What We Do. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.Google Scholar
Freeman, Linton C., and Ataov, Tuerkeoz. 1960. “Invalidity of Indirect and Direct Measures of Attitude toward Cheating.” Journal of Personality 28: 443–7.Google Scholar
Homans, George. 1967. The Nature of Science. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Hyett, G. P. 1979. “Validation of Diary Records of Telephone Calling Behaviour,” pp. 136–8 in The Recall Method in Social Surveys, edited by Moss, Louis and Goldstein, Harvey. London: University of London Institute of Education.Google Scholar
Kahle, Lynn, and Berman, John. 1979. “Attitudes Cause Behaviors: A Cross-Lagged Panel Analysis.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37(3): 315–21.Google Scholar
Kahle, Lynn, Klingel, David M., and Kulka, Richard A.. 1981. “A Longitudinal Study of Adolescents’ Attitude-Behavior Consistency.” Public Opinion Quarterly 45: 402–14.Google Scholar
Killworth, Peter D., and H. Russell Bernard. 1976. “Informant Accuracy in Social Network Data.” Human Organization 35: 269–86.Google Scholar
Killworth, Peter D., and Bernard, H. Russell. 1979. “Informant Accuracy in Social Network Data, III. A Comparison of Triadic Structures in Behavioral and Cognitive Data.” Social Networks 2: 19–46.Google Scholar
Kronenfeld, David B., Kronenfeld, Judy, and Kronenfeld, Jerrold E.. 1972. “Toward a Science of Design for Successful Food Service.” Institutions 70(11): 38–44.Google Scholar
La Pierre, Richard. 1934. “Attitudes versus Actions.” Social Forces 13: 230–7.Google Scholar
Poggie, John Jr. 1972. “Toward Quality Control in Key Informant Data.” Human Organization 31: 23–30.Google Scholar
Romney, A. Kimball, and Faust, Katherine. 1982. “Predicting the Structure of a Communications Network from Recalled Data.” Social Networks 4: 285–304.Google Scholar
Romney, A. Kimball, and Weller, Susan. 1984. “Predicting Informant Accuracy from Patterns of Recall among Individuals.” Social Networks 6(1): 59–77.Google Scholar
Sankoff, Gillian. 1971. “Quantitative Analysis of Sharing and Variability in a Cognitive Model.” Ethnology 10: 389–408.Google Scholar
Shweder, Richard A. 1977. “Likeliness and Likelihood in Everyday Thought: Magical Thinking in Judgments about Personality.” Current Anthropology 18: 637–48.Google Scholar
Shweder, Richard A., and Andrade, Roy. 1979. “Rethinking Culture and Personality Theory, Part I: A Critical Examination of Two Classical Postulates.” Ethos 7: 255–78.Google Scholar
Shweder, Richard A., and D’Andrade, Roy. 1980. “The Systematic Distortion Hypothesis.” New Directions for Methodology of Behavioral Science 4: 37–58.Google Scholar
Sudman, Seymour, and Bradburn, Norman. 1973. “Effects of Time and Memory Factors on Response in Surveys.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 68(344): 805–15.Google Scholar
Sudman, Seymour, and Bradburn, Norman. 1974. Response Effects in Surveys: A Review and Synthesis. Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
Sudman, Seymour, and Bradburn, Norman. 1982. Asking Questions: A Practical Guide to Questionnaire Design. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel. 1974. “Judgment under Uncertainty.” Science 185: 1124–31.Google Scholar
Tversky, Amos, and Kahneman, Daniel. 1981. “The Framing of Decisions in the Psychology of Choice.” Science 211: 453–8.Google Scholar
Weisner, Thomas S., Gallimore, Ronald, and Tharp, Roland. 1982. “Concordance between Ethnographer and Folk Perspectives: Observed Performance and Self-Ascription of Sibling Caretaking Roles.” Human Organization 44: 237–44.Google Scholar
Weller, Susan. 1984. “Consistency and Consensus among Informants: Disease Concepts in a Rural Mexican Village.” American Anthropologist 86(4): 966–75.Google Scholar

References

Adams, Jimi, and Moody, James. 2007. “To Tell the Truth: Measuring Concordance in Multiple Reported Network Data.” Social Networks 29(1): 44–58.Google Scholar
Bernard, H. Russell, and Peter D. Killworth., 1973. “On the Social Structure of an Ocean-Going Research Vessel and Other Important Things.” Social Science Research 2: 145–84.Google Scholar
Bernard, H. Russell, and Peter D. Killworth., 1977. “Informant Accuracy in Social Network Data II.” Human Communications Research 4: 3–18.Google Scholar
Bernard, H. Russell, Peter D. Killworth, and L. Sailer., 1979. “Informant Accuracy in Social Network Data IV.” Social Networks 2: 191–218.Google Scholar
Bernard, H. Russell, Peter D. Killworth, and L. Sailer., 1982. “Informant Accuracy in Social Network Data V.” Social Science Research 5: 30–66.Google Scholar
Bernard, H. Russell, Peter D. Killworth, L. Sailer, and D. Kronenfeld., 1984. “The Problem of Informant Accuracy: The Validity of Retrospective Data.” Annual Review of Anthropology 13: 495–517.Google Scholar
Bott, Elizabeth. 1957. Family and Social Network. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
Burt, Ronal S., and Bittner., William. M. 1981. “A Note on Inferences Regarding Network Subgroups.” Social Networks 3: 71–88.Google Scholar
Freeman, Linton C., and Romney., A. Kimball 1987. “Words, Deeds and Social Structure: A Preliminary Study of the Reliability of Informants.” Human Organization 46(4): 330–4.Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark S. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” American Journal of Sociology 78(6): 1360–80.Google Scholar
Green Jr., Harrold D., Hoover, Matthew A., Wagner, Glenn, Ryan, Gery W., and Ssegujja, Eric. 2014. “Measuring Agreement between Egos and Alters: Understanding Informant Accuracy in Personal Network Studies.” Field Methods 26(2): 126–40.Google Scholar
Hurlbert, Jeanne S., Haines, Valerie A., and Beggs., John J. 2000. “Core Networks and Tie Activation: What Kinds of Routine Networks Allocate Resources in Nonroutine Situations?” American Sociological Review 6594: 598–618.Google Scholar
Johnson, Jeffrey C. 1994. “Anthropological Contributions to the Study of Social Networks: A Review.” In Advances in Social Network Analysis: Research in the Social and Behavioral Sciences, edited by Wasserman, S. and Galaskiowicz, J.. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Killworth, Peter D., and Russell Bernard., H. 1974. “Catij: A New Sociometric and Its Application to a Prison Living Unit.” Human Organization 33: 335–50.Google Scholar
Killworth, Peter D., and Russell Bernard., H. 1976. “Informant Accuracy in Social Network Data.” Human Organization 35: 269–96.Google Scholar
Killworth, Peter D., and Russell Bernard., H. 1979. “Informant Accuracy in Social Network Data III.” Social Networks 2: 19–46.Google Scholar
Laumann, Edward O. 1965. “Subjective Social Distance and Urban Occupational Stratification.” American Journal of Sociology 71: 26–36.Google Scholar
Marsden, Peter. 1990. “Network Data and Measurement.” Annual Review of Sociology 16: 435–63.Google Scholar
Marsden, Peter. 1993. “The Reliability of Network Density and Composition Measures.” Social Networks 15(4): 399–421.Google Scholar
McPherson, Miller, Smith-Lovin, Lynn, and Cook, James M.. 2001. “Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks.” Annual Review of Sociology 27(1): 415–444.Google Scholar
McPherson, Miller, Smith-Lovin, Lynn, and Brashears., Matthew 2006. “Social Isolation in America: Changes in Core Discussion Networks over Two Decades.” American Sociological Review 71(3): 353–75.Google Scholar
Nunnally, Jum C. 1978. Psychometric Theory, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Park, Namkee, Lee, Seungyoon, and Kim, Jang Hyun. 2012. “Individuals’ Personal Network Characteristics and Patterns of Facebook Use: A Social Network Approach.” Computers in Human Behavior 28(5): 1700–7.Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. 2019. “Facebook Algorithms and Personal Data.” Washington, DC. Available at: www.pewresearch.org/internet/2019/01/16/facebook-algorithms-and-personal-data/ [last accessed February 14, 2021].Google Scholar
Phillips, Gregory, Janulis, Patrick, Mustanski, Brian, and Birkett, Michelle. 2017. “Validation of Tie Corroboration and Reported Alter Characteristics among a Sample of Young Men Who Have Sex with Men.” Social Networks 48: 250–5.Google Scholar
Romney, A. Kimball, and Faust, Katherine. 1982. “Predicting the Structure of a Communications Network from Recalled Data.” Social Networks 4(4): 285–304.Google Scholar
Romney, A. Kimball, and Weller., Susan C. 1984. “Predicting Informant Accuracy from Patterns of Recall among Individuals.” Social Networks 4: 59–77.Google Scholar
Romney, A. Kimball, Weller, Susan C., and Batchelder., William H. 1986. “Culture as Consensus: A Theory of Culture and Informant Accuracy.” American Anthropologist 88(2): 313–33.Google Scholar
Vacca, Raffaele, Solano, Giacomo, Lubbers, Miranda J., Molina, José L, McCarty, Christopher. 2018. “A Personal Network Approach to the Study of Immigrant Structural Assimilation and Transnationalism.” Social Networks 53: 72–89.Google Scholar
Wellman, Barry. 1979. “The Community Question: The Intimate Networks of East Yorkers.” American Journal of Sociology 84(5): 1201–31.Google Scholar

References

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1996. The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, and Lalman, David. 1992. War and Reason. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Chanowitz, Benzion, and Langer, Ellen J.. 1980. “Knowing More (or Less) Than You Can Show: Understanding Control Through the Mindlessness/Mindfulness Distinction.” In Human Helplessness: Theory and Application, edited by Seligman, Martin E. P. and Garber, Judy. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cicourel, Aaron V. 1980. “Three Models of Discourse Analysis.” Discourse Processes 3: 101–31.Google Scholar
Coleman, James. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Favereau, Olivier. 2005. “The Missing Piece in Rational Choice Theory.” Revue française de sociologie 46(5): 103–22.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Gibson, James. 1979. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1955. “On Face Work.” Psychiatry 18: 213–31.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Hanks, William F. 1990. Referential Practice: Language and Lived Space among the Maya. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lazega, Emmanuel, and Favereau, Olivier, (eds.). 2002. Conventions and Structures. London: Elgar.Google Scholar
Lindenberg, Siegwart. 1989. “Choice and Culture: The Behavioral Basis of Cultural Impact on Transactions,” pp. 175–200 in Social Structure and Culture, edited by Haferkamp, Hans. Berlin: DeGruyter.Google Scholar
Lindenberg, Stewart, Coleman, James S., and Nowak, Stefan, (eds.). 1986. Approaches to Social Theory. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Lucy, John A., (ed.). 1993. Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. 1989. Ecological Communication. Cambridge: Polity/Blackwell.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. 1995. Social Systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Mische, Ann. 2008. Partisan Publics: Contention and Mediation across Brazilian Youth Activist Networks. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mische, Ann, and White, Harrison C.. 1998. “Between Conversation and Situation: Public Switching Dynamics across Network Domains.” Social Research 65: 295–324.Google Scholar
Mischel, Walter. 1990. “Personality Dispositions Revisited and Revised: A View after Three Decades,” in Handbook of Personality Theory and Research, edited by Pervin, L.. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Padgett, John E., and McLean, Paul D.. 2006. “Organizational Invention and Elite Transformation: The Birth of Partnership Systems in Renaissance Florence.” American Journal of Sociology 111: 1463–568.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott. 1937. The Structure of Social Action. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Michael. 1958. Personal Knowledge. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Powell, Walter W. 2002. “Neither Market Nor Hierarchy,” pp. 119–62 in Strategy: Critical Perspectives on Business and Management, vol. 4, edited by Faulkner, David. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Riker, William H. 1982. “Implications from the Disequilibrium of Majority Rule for the Study of Institutions,” in Political Equilibrium, edited by Ordeshook, Peter and Shepsle, Kenneth. Boston, MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Sawyer, Keith. 1992. “The Pragmatics of Play: Interactional Strategies during Children’s Pretend Play.” Pragmatics 3: 259–82.Google Scholar
Sorokin, Pitrim A. 1956. The American Sex Revolution. Boston, MA: Porter Sargent Publishers.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1975. “Reflections on the History of European State-Making,” pp. 3–83 in The Formation of National States in Western Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Vaughan, Diane. 2002. “Signals and Interpretive Work: The Role of Culture in a Theory of Practical Action.” In Culture in Mind: Toward a Sociology of Culture and Cognition, edited by Cerulo, Karen. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

References

Abbott, Andrew. 2001. Chaos of Disciplines. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ansell, Christopher K. 1997. “Symbolic Networks: The Realignment of the French Working Class, 1887‐1894.” American Journal of Sociology 103(2): 359–90. https://doi.org/10.1086/231211Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Edited by Holquist, Michael. Translated by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin, TX and London: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1986. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Translated by Vern W. McGee. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Beckert, Jens. 2016. Imagined Futures: Fictional Expectations and Capitalist Dynamics, 1st ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Boorman, Scott A., and White, Harrison C.. 1976. “Social Structure from Multiple Networks. II. Role Structures.” American Journal of Sociology 81(6): 1384–446. https://doi.org/10.1086/226228Google Scholar
Bothner, Matthew, and White, Harrison. 2001. “Market Orientation and Monopoly Power,” pp. 182–208 in Dynamics of Organizations: Computational Modeling and Organizational Theories, edited by Lomi, Alessandro and Larsen, Erik R., 1st ed. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.Google Scholar
Breiger, Ronald L., Boorman, Scott A., and Arabie, Phipps. 1975. “An Algorithm for Clustering Relational Data with Applications to Social Network Analysis and Comparison with Multidimensional Scaling.” Journal of Mathematical Psychology 12(3): 328–83.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 2006. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, 1st ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1985. Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Diehl, David, and McFarland, Daniel A.. 2012. “Classroom Ordering and the Situational Imperatives of Routine and Ritual.” Sociology of Education 85(4): 326–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040712452093Google Scholar
Erikson, Emily. 2013. “Formalist and Relationalist Theory in Social Network Analysis.” Sociological Theory 31(3): 219–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275113501998Google Scholar
Fontdevila, Jorge, and White, Harrison C.. 2010. “Power from Switching across Netdoms through Reflexive and Indexical Language.” Redes. Revista Hispana Para El Análisis de Redes Sociales 18(13): 326–49.Google Scholar
Fontdevila, Jorge, Pilar Opazo, M., and White, Harrison C.. 2011. “Order at the Edge of Chaos: Meanings from Netdom Switchings across Functional Systems.” Sociological Theory 29(3): 178–98.Google Scholar
Fuhse, Jan A. 2009. “The Meaning Structure of Networks.” Sociological Theory 27: 51–73.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Scarborough, ON: Prentice-Hall Inc.Google Scholar
Gibson, David. 2003. “Participation Shifts: Order and Differentiation in Group Conversation.” Social Forces 81(4): 1135–81.Google Scholar
Gibson, David. 2005a. “Opportunistic Interruptions: Interactional Vulnerabilities Deriving from Linearization.” Social Psychology Quarterly 68(4): 316–37.Google Scholar
Gibson, David. 2005b. “Taking Turns and Talking Ties: Network Structure and Conversational Sequences.” American Journal of Sociology 110(6): 1561–97.Google Scholar
Godart, Frédéric C., and White, Harrison C.. 2010. “Switchings under Uncertainty: The Coming and Becoming of Meanings.” Poetics, toward a Relational Sociology of Meaning: Language and Socio-cultural Processes 38(6): 567–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2010.09.003Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles, and Duranti, Alessandro, (eds.). 1992. Rethinking Context: Language as Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J. 1982. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1976. System and Function in Language: Selected Papers, edited by Kress, G.. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1978. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Hanks, William F. 1992. The Indexical Grounds of Deictic Reference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, Paul J., and Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ikegami, Eiko. 2005. Bonds of Civility: Aesthetic Networks and the Political Origins of Japanese Culture. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kirchner, Corinne, and Mohr, John W.. 2010. “Meanings and Relations: An Introduction to the Study of Language, Discourse and Networks.” Poetics, toward a Relational Sociology of Meaning: Language and Socio-cultural Processes 38(6): 555–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2010.09.006Google Scholar
Lakoff, Andrew. 2017. Unprepared: Global Health in a Time of Emergency, 1st ed. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Leifer, Eric M. 1988. “Interaction Preludes to Role Setting: Exploratory Local Action.” American Sociological Review 53(6): 865–78. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095896Google Scholar
Lorrain, François and White, Harrison C.. 1971. “Structural Equivalence of Individuals in Social Networks.” The Journal of Mathematical Sociology 1(1): 49–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.1971.9989788Google Scholar
Mahoney, James, and Thelen, Kathleen. 2010. Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McFarland, Daniel A. 2001. “Student Resistance: How the Formal and Informal Organization of Classrooms Facilitate Everyday Forms of Student Defiance.” American Journal of Sociology 107(3): 612–78. https://doi.org/10.1086/338779Google Scholar
McFarland, Daniel A. 2004. “Resistance as a Social Drama: A Study of Change-Oriented Encounters.” American Journal of Sociology 109(6): 1249–318.Google Scholar
McLean, Paul D. 1998. “A Frame Analysis of Favor Seeking in the Renaissance: Agency, Networks, and Political Culture.” American Journal of Sociology 104: 51–91.Google Scholar
McLean, Paul D. 2007. The Art of the Network: Strategic Interaction and Patronage in Renaissance Florence. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Mische, Ann. 2008. Partisan Publics: Communication and Contention across Brazilian Youth Activist Networks. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mische, Ann. 2011. “Relational Sociology, Culture, and Agency,” pp. 80–97 in The Sage Handbook of Social Network Analysis, edited by Scott, John and Carrington, Peter. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Mische, Ann. 2015a. “Partisan Performance: The Relational Construction of Brazilian Youth Activist Publics,” pp. 430–71 in Social Movements in Latin America: New Theoretical Trends and Lessons from a Mobilized Region, edited by von Bulow, Marisa and Rossi, Federico. Surrey: Ashgate Publications.Google Scholar
Mische, Ann. 2015b. “Fractal Arenas: Dilemmas of Strategy and Style in a Brazilian Student Congress.” In Players and Arenas: The Interactive Dynamics of Protest, edited by Duyvendak, Jan Willem and Jasper, James M.. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Mische, Ann, and White, Harrison. 1998. “Between Conversation and Situation: Public Switching Dynamics across Network Domains.” Social Research 65(3): 695–724.Google Scholar
Mische, Ann, and Chandler, Matthew. 2017. “Narratives, Networks and Publics,” in Routledge Handbook of Cultural Sociology, edited by Hall, John R., Grindstaff, Laura, and Min-Chen, Lo, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mische, Ann, and Pattison, Philippa. 2000. “Composing a Civic Arena: Publics, Projects, and Social Settings.” Poetics 27: 163–94.Google Scholar
Mohr, John. 1998. “Measuring Meaning Structures.” Annual Review of Sociology 24: 345–70.Google Scholar
Mohr, John W., and White, Harrison C.. 2008. “How to Model an Institution.” Theory and Society 37(5): 485–512.Google Scholar
Pachucki, Mark A., and Breiger, Ronald L.. 2010. “Cultural Holes: Beyond Relationality in Social Networks and Culture.” Annual Review of Sociology 36(1): 205–24. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102615Google Scholar
Padgett, John F., and Ansell, Christopher K.. 1993. “Robust Action and the Rise of the Medici, 1400–1434.” American Journal of Sociology 98: 1259–319.Google Scholar
Polletta, Francesca. 2006. It Was Like a Fever: Storytelling in Protest and Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schriffen, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sheller, Mimi. 2000. Democracy After Slavery: Black Publics and Peasant Radicalism in Haiti and Jamaica. Oxford: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 2003. “Indexical Order and the Dialectics of Sociolinguistic Life.” Language and Communication 23(3–4): 193–229.Google Scholar
Steinberg, Marc W. 1999. “The Talk and Back Talk of Collective Action: A Dialogic Analysis of Repertoires of Discourse among Nineteenth‐Century English Cotton Spinners.” American Journal of Sociology 105(3): 736–80. https://doi.org/10.1086/210359Google Scholar
Swidler, Ann. 1986. “Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies.” American Sociological Review 51: 273–86.Google Scholar
Swidler, Ann. 2001. Talk of Love: How Culture Matters. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1993. “A Skeleton Key to Harrison White, Identity and Control” presented at the Colloquium on Identity and Control: A New Work by Harrison White, New School for Social Research, February 18.Google Scholar
Wagner-Pacifici, Robin. 2017. What Is an Event? Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
White, Harrison C. 1992. Identity and Control: A Structural Theory of Social Action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
White, Harrison C. 1995. “Network Switchings and Bayesian Forks: Reconstructing the Social and Behavioral Sciences.” Social Research 62: 1035–63.Google Scholar
White, Harrison C. 2004. Markets from Networks: Socioeconomic Models of Production. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
White, Harrison C. 2008. Identity and Control: How Social Formations Emerge, 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
White, Harrison C., Godart, Frédéric C, and Corona, Victor P.. 2007. “Mobilizing Identities: Uncertainty and Control in Strategy.” Theory, Culture & Society 24(7–8): 181–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276407084703Google Scholar
White, Harrison C., Boorman, Scott A., and Breiger, Ronald L.. 1976. “Social Structure from Multiple Networks. I. Blockmodels of Roles and Positions.” American Journal of Sociology 81(4): 730–80.Google Scholar
Zelizer, Viviana A. 2013. Economic Lives: How Culture Shapes the Economy. Reprint edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×