Book contents
- Performances at Court in the Age of Shakespeare
- Performances at Court in the Age of Shakespeare
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Notes on Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Textual Note
- General Introduction
- Part I Elizabethan Court Theatre
- Chapter 1 Palamon and Arcite: Early Elizabethan Court Theatre
- Chapter 2 Revels at the Court of Elizabeth I, 1594–1603
- Chapter 3 Multiple Marlowe: Doctor Faustus and Court Performance
- Chapter 4 The Court Theatre Response to the Public Theatre Debate in A Midsummer Night’s Dream
- Part II The Jacobean Tradition
- Part III Reassessing the Stuart Masque
- Part IV The Material Conditions of Performances at Court
- General Bibliography
- Index
Chapter 2 - Revels at the Court of Elizabeth I, 1594–1603
from Part I - Elizabethan Court Theatre
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 October 2019
- Performances at Court in the Age of Shakespeare
- Performances at Court in the Age of Shakespeare
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Notes on Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Textual Note
- General Introduction
- Part I Elizabethan Court Theatre
- Chapter 1 Palamon and Arcite: Early Elizabethan Court Theatre
- Chapter 2 Revels at the Court of Elizabeth I, 1594–1603
- Chapter 3 Multiple Marlowe: Doctor Faustus and Court Performance
- Chapter 4 The Court Theatre Response to the Public Theatre Debate in A Midsummer Night’s Dream
- Part II The Jacobean Tradition
- Part III Reassessing the Stuart Masque
- Part IV The Material Conditions of Performances at Court
- General Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Chapter 2 argues that 1594 was an extraordinary year in the history of Elizabeth I’s revels. According to William R. Streitberger, documentary evidence shows that in 1593 Master of the Revels Edmund Tilney attempted to impose a 'composition' signed by the Queen which made the Revels Office responsible for 'plays only' and reduced its budget both for the wages of the officers and production costs. The under officers of the Revels refused to accept this composition, making it impossible for Tilney to pay Revels Office bills until a settlement was reached five years later. In April 1594 the 5th Earl of Derby died, and many of Derby’s players later wound up in the Admiral’s and Chamberlain’s companies. The connection between the problems in the Revels Office between 1593 and 1598, the formation of these two companies, and the successful restart of the Queen’s revels in December 1594 can only be properly understood in the context of the efforts begun in 1573 by the Queen and a small group of her relatives and personal friends on the Privy Council to reform the Revels Office.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Performances at Court in the Age of Shakespeare , pp. 35 - 50Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019