Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-669899f699-chc8l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-03T18:03:59.211Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Penance and the Carolingian Reforms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2014

Rob Meens
Rob Meens
Affiliation:
Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
Get access

Summary

We have seen in the last chapter that penitential handbooks from Ireland were known in England and on the European mainland from the late sixth century onward. Probably they had been introduced there by Irish monks during their peregrinatio. Apart from particular historical figures such as Columbanus and Fursa, the influence of whom we have sketched above, there might have been more about whom we do not know a lot. However, the evidence for the existence of penitential handbooks and the practice of hearing confession that these texts presuppose, dating from the seventh and early eighth centuries, is scarce. Although, for example, Cummean’s penitential was used in a couple of eighth- and ninth-century texts, only one manuscript – and a rather late one – containing this text has survived. There are good reasons for this lack of manuscript evidence. As is clear from the case of the penitential attributed to Egbert, the manuscripts may have remained unbound, existing only as loose quires. This would endanger their preservation for future generations, while the fact that they probably were written in an insular script, which at some point was no longer easy to read, may also have contributed to the bad state of survival of these texts. At the Carolingian councils of the first half of the ninth century, penitential handbooks came under fire and, as we shall see in this chapter, the council of Paris (829) actually called for the destruction of such books. It is not very probable that such an inquisition had much success, but it goes to show that we must reckon with the fact that many penitential handbooks did not survive the ravages of time.

Type
Chapter
Information
Penance in Medieval Europe, 600–1200 , pp. 101 - 139
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Kottje, R., ‘Überlieferung und Rezeption der irischen Bußbücher auf dem Kontinent’, in Löwe, H. (ed.), Die Iren und Europa im früheren Mittelalter, vol. i (Stuttgart 1982), pp. 511–24.Google Scholar
Ganz, D., ‘Book production in the Carolingian empire and the spread of Caroline minuscule’, in McKitterick, R. (ed.), The New Cambridge Medieval History, vol. ii, c. 700–c. 900 (Cambridge 1995), pp. 786–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jong, M., ‘Charlemagne’s Church’, in Story, J. (ed.), Charlemagne. Empire and Society (Manchester 2005), pp. 103–35.Google Scholar
de Jong, M., ‘Sacrum palatium et ecclesia. L'autorité religieuse royale sous les Carolingiens (790–840)’, Annales HSS 58 (2003), pp. 1243–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angenendt, A., ‘“Er war der Erste…”. Willibrords historische Stellung’, in Bange, P. and Weiler, A. (eds.), Willibrord, zijn wereld en zijn werk. Voordrachten gehouden tijdens het Willibrordcongres Nijmegen, 28–30 september 1989, Middeleeuwse Studies 6 (Nijmegen 1990), pp. 13–34, at pp. 17–18Google Scholar
Fouracre, P., The Age of Charles Martel (Harlow 2000), pp. 126–7.Google Scholar
Alcuin, , Vita Willibrordi, c. 5, ed. Levison, W., MGH SS rer. Mer. VII (Hanover / Leipzig 1920), pp. 120–1Google Scholar
van Egmond, W. S., ‘Radbod van de Friezen, een aristocraat in de periferie’, Millennium 19 (2005), pp. 24–44.Google Scholar
Meens, R., ‘Het heilige bezoedeld. Opvattingen over het heilige en het onreine in de vroegmiddeleeuwse religieuze mentaliteit’, in Bange, P. and Weiler, A. (eds.), Willibrord, zijn wereld en zijn werk. Voordrachten gehouden tijdens het Willibrordcongres Nijmegen, 28–30 september 1989, Middeleeuwse Studies 6 (Nijmegen 1990), pp. 237–55, at pp. 241–2.Google Scholar
Siems, H., Studien zur Lex Frisionum (Ebelsbach 1980)Google Scholar
Diekamp, W., Die Geschichtsquellen des Bistums Münster, vol. iv (Münster 1881), pp. 10–11.Google Scholar
Meens, R., ‘Children and confession in the early Middle Ages’, in Wood, D. (ed.), The Church and Childhood, Studies in Church History 31 (Oxford 1994), pp. 53–65.Google Scholar
Meens, R., ‘Willibrords boeteboek?’, Tijdschrift voor Geschiedenis 106 (1993), pp. 163–78Google Scholar
Meens, R., ‘Christentum und Heidentum aus der Sicht Willibrords? Überlegungen zum Paenitentiale Oxoniense II’, in Polfer, M. (ed.), L'évangélisation des régions entre Meuse et Moselle et la fondation de l'abbaye d'Echternach (Ve–IXe siècle). Actes des 10es Journées Lotharingiennes, Publications de la Section Historique de l'Institut G.-D. de Luxembourg 117 (Luxembourg 2000), pp. 415–28Google Scholar
Meens, R., ‘Het christendom van Willibrord en Bonifatius’, Trajecta 15 (2006), pp. 342–58, at p. 345.Google Scholar
Stubbs, W., Councils and Ecclesiastical Documents Relating to Great Britain and Ireland, vol. iii (Oxford 1871; repr. 1964), p. 373Google Scholar
Cubitt, C., Anglo-Saxon Church Councils c. 650–c. 850 (London / New York 1995), p. 101.Google Scholar
Bachrach, , ‘Confession in the Regnum Francorum’ and Bachrach, Religion and the Conduct of War c. 300 – c. 1215 (Woodbridge 2003), pp. 43–62.Google Scholar
Fischer, A., Karl Martell. Der Beginn der karolingischen Herrschaft (Stuttgart 2012), pp. 53–4.Google Scholar
Costambeys, M., ‘An aristocratic community on the northern Frankish frontier 690–726’, Early Medieval Europe 3 (1994), pp. 39–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rau, R., Briefe des Bonifatius. Willibalds Leben des Bonifatius. Nebst einigen zeitgenössischen Dokumenten, Ausgewählte Quellen zur deutschen Geschichte des Mittelalters. Freiherr vom Stein-Gedächtnisausgabe, vol. ivb (Darmstadt 1968), p. 486:Google Scholar
Schieffer, T., Winfrid-Bonifatius und die christliche Grundlegung Europas (Darmstadt 1980), pp. 118–19Google Scholar
Weiler, A., Willibrords Missie. Christendom en cultuur in de zevende en achtste eeuw (Hilversum 1989), pp. 158–9Google Scholar
Mostert, M., 754, Bonifatius bij Dokkum vermoord (Hilversum 1999), pp. 44–5Google Scholar
von Padberg, L., Bonifatius. Missionar und Reformer (Munich 2003), pp. 35–6Google Scholar
Meens, R., ‘With one foot in the font. The failed baptism of the Frisian king Radbod and the eighth century discussion about the fate of unbaptized forefathers’, in Moran, P. and Warntjes, I. (eds.), Culture and Tradition in Medieval Ireland. A Festschrift for Dáibhí Ó Cróinín (Turnhout 2014) (in press).Google Scholar
Nonn, U., ‘Castitas et vitae et fidei et doctrinae – Bonifatius und die Reformkonzilien’, in Felten, F. J., Jarnut, J. and von Padberg, L. (eds.), Bonifatius. Leben und Nachwirken (754–2004) (Wiesbaden 2007), pp. 271–80.Google Scholar
Innes, M., ‘“Immune from heresy”: defining the boundaries of Carolingian Christianity’, in Fouracre, P. and Ganz, D. (eds.), Frankland. The Franks and the World of the Early Middle Ages. Essays in Honour of Dame Jinty Nelson (Manchester 2008), pp. 101–25Google Scholar
Meeder, S., ‘Boniface and the Irish heresy of Clemens’, Church History 80 (2011), pp. 251–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reuter, T., ‘“Kirchenreform” und “Kirchenpolitik” im Zeitalter Karl Martells: Begriffe und Wirklichkeit’, in Jarnut, J., Nonn, U. and Richter, M. (eds.), Karl Martell in seiner Zeit (Sigmaringen 1994), pp. 35–59.Google Scholar
de Jong, M., ‘Bonifatius: een Angelsaksische priester-monnik en het Frankische hof’, Millennium 19 (2005), pp. 5–23.Google Scholar
Schmitz, H., Die Bussbücher und das kanonische Bussverfahren (Düsseldorf 1898), pp. 597–644Google Scholar
Körntgen, , ‘Kanonisches recht und Busspraxis. Zu Kontext und Funktion des Paenitentiale Excarpsus Cummeani’, in Müller, W. P. and Sommar, M. E. (eds.), Medieval Church Law and the Origins of the Western Legal Tradition. A Tribute to Kenneth Pennington (Washington 2006), pp. 17–32.Google Scholar
Glatthaar, M., Bonifatius und das Sakrileg. Zur politischen Dimension eines Rechtsbegriffs, Freiburger Beiträge zur mittelalterlichen Geschichte 17 (Frankfurt a.M. etc. 2004), pp. 386–9Google Scholar
Ganz, D., Corbie in the Carolingian Renaissance (Sigmaringen 1990), p. 20.Google Scholar
Meens, R., ‘Aspekte der Christianisierung des Volkes’, in Felten, F. J., Jarnut, J. and von Padberg, L. (eds.), Bonifatius. Leben und Nachwirken (754–2004) (Wiesbaden 2007), pp. 211–29, at pp. 219–27.Google Scholar
Brommer, P., ‘Capitula Episcoporum’. Die bischöflichen Kapitularien des 9. und 10. Jahrhunderts, Typologie des sources 43 (Turnhout 1985)Google Scholar
van Rhijn, C., Shepherds of the Lord. Priests and Episcopal Statutes in the Carolingian Period (Turnhout 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kottje, R., ‘Einheit und Vielfalt des kirchlichen Lebens in der Karolingerzeit’, Zeitschrift für Kirchengeschichte 76 (1965), pp. 323–42Google Scholar
McKitterick, R., ‘Unity and diversity in the Carolingian Church’, in Swanson, R. (ed.), Unity and Diversity in the Church, Studies in Church History 32 (Oxford 1996), pp. 59–82Google Scholar
Mahadevan, L., ‘Überlieferung und Verbreitung des Bussbuchs “Capitula Iudiciorum”’, ZRG Kan. Abt. 72 (1986), pp. 17–75Google Scholar
McKitterick, R., ‘Kingship and the writing of history’, in McKitterick, , History and Memory in the Carolingian World (Cambridge 2004), pp. 133–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mordek, H., Zechiel-Eckes, K. and Glatthaar, M., Die Admonitio generalis Karls des Großen, MGH Fontes Iuris Germanici Antiqui in usum scholarum separatim editi 16 (Hanover 2012).Google Scholar
Buck, T. M., Admonitio und Praedicatio. Zur religions-pastoralen Dimension von Kapitularien und kapitulariennahen Texten (507–814) (Frankfurt 1997).Google Scholar
Hammer, C., ‘Country churches. Clerical inventories and the Carolingian renaissance in Bavaria’, Church History 49 (1980), pp. 5–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devroey, J.-P., Le polyptyque et les listes de cens de l'abbaye de Saint-Remi de Reims (IXe–XIe siècles), Travaux de l'Académie Nationale de Reims 163 (Reims 1984), pp. 14, 46, 53Google Scholar
Hase, A., Mittelalterliche Bücherverzeichnisse aus Kloster Lorsch. Einleitung, Edition und Kommentar (Wiesbaden 2002), p. 353.Google Scholar
Schieffer, R., ‘“Redeamus ad fontem”. Rom als Hort authentischer Überlieferung im frühen Mittelalter’, in Angenendt, A. and Schieffer, R., Roma: Caput et Fons (Opladen 1989), pp. 45–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitz, G., Die Kapitulariensammlung des Ansegis, MGH Cap. N.S. I (Hanover 1996).Google Scholar
Hartmann, W., Die Synoden der Karolingerzeit im Frankenreich und in Italien, Konziliengeschichte, Reihe A: Darstellungen (Paderborn / Munich / Vienna / Zürich 1989), pp. 128–40Google Scholar
Schmitz, G., ‘Die Reformkonzilien von 813 und die Sammlung des Benedictus Levita’, Deutsches Archiv 56 (2000), pp. 1–31Google Scholar
Hägermann, D., Karl der Große. Herrscher des Abendlandes: Biographie (third edn, Berlin 2006), pp. 609–13.Google Scholar
Busch, J., Vom Amtswalten zum Königsdienst. Beobachtungen zur ‘Staatssprache’ des Frühmittelalters am Beispiel des Wortes ‘administratio’, MGH Studien und Texte 42 (Hanover 2007), pp. 42–57Google Scholar
Rio, A., Legal Practice and the Written Word in the Early Middle Ages. Frankish Formulae, c. 500–1000 (Cambridge 2009), esp. pp. 193–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, I., ‘Administration, law and culture in Merovingian Gaul’, in McKitterick, R. (ed.), The Uses of Literacy in Early Medieval Europe (Cambridge 1990), pp. 63–81Google Scholar
Dahlhaus-Berg, E., Nova antiquitas et antiqua novitas. Typologische Exegese und isidorianisches Geschichtsbild bei Theodulf von Orléans, Kölner Historische Abhandlungen 23 (Cologne / Vienna 1975), pp. 221–35.Google Scholar
Pokorny, R., ‘Exkurs II: Ist Theodulf II tatsächlich ein Kapitular Theodulfs von Orléans?’, in Pokorny, R. (ed.), Capitula Episcoporum IV, MGH Cap. Ep. IV (Hanover 2005), pp. 96–100.Google Scholar
Schmitz, G. (ed.), Die Kapitulariensammlung des Ansegis, MGH (Hanover 1996), pp. 27–8.Google Scholar
Zechiel-Eckes, K., Florus von Lyon als Kirchenpolitiker und Publizist. Studien zur Persönlichkeit eines karolingischen ‘Intellektuellen’ am Beispiel der Auseinandersetzung mit Amalarius (835–838) und des Prädestinationsstreits (Stuttgart 1999)Google Scholar
d’Achery, L and de la Barre, L.-F.-J., Spicilegium sive collectio veterum aliquot scriptorum qui in Galliae bibliothecis delituerant (Paris 1723), pp. 509–64Google Scholar
Firey, A., ‘Ghostly recensions in early medieval canon law: the problem of the Collectio Dacheriana and its shades’, Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis 68 (2000), pp. 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kottje, R., Die Bussbücher Halitgars von Cambrai und des Hrabanus Maurus. Ihre Überlieferung und ihre Quellen, Beiträge zur Geschichte und Quellenkunde des Mittelalters 8 (Berlin / New York 1980), pp. 50–1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teetaert, A., La confession aux laïcs dans l’Église latine depuis le VIIIe jusqu’au XIVe siècle (Paris / Louvain 1926).Google Scholar
Cathwulf, , Epistola Ad Karolum, ed. Dümmler, E., MGH Epistolae IV (Berlin 1895), pp. 501–5.Google Scholar
Story, J., ‘Cathwulf, kingship, and the royal abbey of Saint-Denis’, Speculum 74 (1999), pp. 1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrison, M., ‘Letters to a king and biblical exempla: the examples of Cathuulf and Clemens Peregrinus’, Early Medieval Europe 7 (1998), pp. 305–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meens, R., ‘Politics, mirrors of princes and the Bible: sins, kings and the well-being of the realm’, Early Medieval Europe 7 (1998), pp. 345–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anton, H. H., ‘Königsvorstellungen bei Iren und Franken im Vergleich’, in Erkens, F.-R., Das frühmittelalterliche Königtum. Ideelle und religiöse Grundlagen, Ergänzungsbände zum Reallexikon der Germanischen Altertumskunde 49 (Berlin / New York 2005), pp. 270–330.Google Scholar
Anton, H. H., Fürstenspiegel und Herrscherethos in der Karolingerzeit, Bonner historische Forschungen 32 (Bonn 1968)Google Scholar
Smith, J., Europe after Rome. A New Cultural History (Oxford 2005), pp. 239–52.Google Scholar
Mordek, H., ‘Karls des Großen zweites Kapitular von Herstal und die Hungersnot der Jahre 778/770’, Deutsches Archiv 61 (2005), pp. 1–52, at p. 50Google Scholar
McCormick, M., Eternal Victory. Triumphal Rulership in Late Antiquity and the Early Medieval West (Cambridge 1986)Google Scholar
McCormick, , ‘The liturgy of war in the early Middle Ages: crisis, litanies, and the Carolingian monarchy’, Viator 15 (1984), pp. 1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godman, P. and Collins, R. (eds.), Charlemagne’s Heir. New Perspectives on the Reign of Louis the Pious (814–840) (Oxford 1990).Google Scholar
Noble, T. F. X., ‘Louis the Pious and his piety reconsidered’, Revue Belge de philologie et d’histoire 58 (1980), pp. 297–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jong, M., The Penitential State. Authority and Atonement in the Age of Louis the Pious, 814–840 (Cambridge 2009)Google Scholar
Booker, C., Past Convictions. The Penance of Louis the Pious and the Decline of the Carolingians (Philadelphia 2009).Google Scholar
Dutton, P. E. (ed.), Carolingian Civilization. A Reader (Peterborough, Ontario 1993), p. 181.Google Scholar
Dümmler, E., Abhandlungen der kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, phil.-hist. Klasse (Berlin 1900), p. 69.Google Scholar
van Acker, L., Agobardi Lugdunensi Opera Omnia, CC CM 52 (Turnhout 1981), p. 311Google Scholar
Garnier, C. and Kamp, H. (eds.), Spielregeln der Mächtigen. Mittelalterliche Politik zwischen Gewohnheit und Konvention (Darmstadt 2010).Google Scholar
Capitula Neustrica tertia, c. 2, ed. Pokorny, R., MGH Cap. Ep. III (Hanover 1995), p. 65Google Scholar
Hartmann, W., ‘Neue Texte zur bischöflichen Reformgesetzgebung aus den Jahren 829–31. Vier Diözesansynoden Halitgars von Cambrai’, Deutsches Archiv 35 (1979), pp. 368–94Google Scholar
Kottje, R., ‘Ein Fragment des “Paenitentiale” Halitgars von Cambrai aus einem Frühdruck der “Institutionen” Justinians’, Sacris Erudiri 44 (2005), pp. 241–6, at p. 243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haggenmüller, R., ‘Zur Rezeption der Beda und Egbert zugeschriebenen Bußbücher’, in Mordek, H. (ed.), Aus Archiven und Bibliotheken. Festschrift für Raymund Kottje zum 65. Geburtstag (Frankfurt a.M. / Bern / etc. 1992), pp. 149–59.Google Scholar
Kerff, F., Der Quadripartitus. Ein Handbuch der karolingischen Kirchenreform. Überlieferung, Quellen und Rezeption, Quellen und Forschungen zum Recht im Mittelalter 1 (Sigmaringen 1982), pp. 61–4.Google Scholar
Kerff, F., ‘Das Paenitentiale Pseudo-Gregorii III. Ein Zeugnis karolingischer Reformbestrebungen’, ZRG Kan Abt. 69 (1983), pp. 46–63Google Scholar
Kottje, R., ‘“Buße oder Strafe?”. Zur “Iustitia” in den “Libri Paenitentiales”’, in La Giustizia nell'alto medioevo (secoli V–VIII), Settimane di Studio 42 (Spoleto 1995), pp. 443–74, at p. 449, n. 17.Google Scholar
van Rhijn, C. (ed.), Paenitentiale Pseudo-Theodori, CC SL 156 B (Turnhout 2009), pp. xiv–xvii.Google Scholar
van Rhijn, C. and Saan, M., ‘Correcting sinners, correcting texts: a context for the Paenitentiale pseudo-Theodori’, Early Medieval Europe 14 (2006), pp. 23–40, at p. 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kottje, R., ‘Busspraxis und Bussritus’, in Segni e riti nella chiesa altomedievale occidentale, Settimane di studio 33 (Spoleto 1987), pp. 369–95Google Scholar
Körntgen, L., ‘Bußbuch und Bußpraxis in der zweiten Hälfte des 9. Jahrhunderts’, in Hartmann, W. (ed.), Recht und Gericht in Kirche und Welt um 900, Schriften des Historischen Kollegs, Kolloquien 69 (Munich 2007), pp. 197–215.Google Scholar
Brundage, J., Law, Sex, and Christian Society in Medieval Europe (Chicago / London 1987), pp. 158–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Penance and the Carolingian Reforms
  • Rob Meens, Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Book: Penance in Medieval Europe, 600–1200
  • Online publication: 05 August 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139029667.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Penance and the Carolingian Reforms
  • Rob Meens, Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Book: Penance in Medieval Europe, 600–1200
  • Online publication: 05 August 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139029667.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Penance and the Carolingian Reforms
  • Rob Meens, Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands
  • Book: Penance in Medieval Europe, 600–1200
  • Online publication: 05 August 2014
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139029667.005
Available formats
×