Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T14:51:06.859Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

22 - Peer Relationships in Cultural Perspective: Methodological Reflections

from Conclusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 August 2009

By
Barry H. Schneider ,
Doran C. French  and
Xinyin Chen
Edited by
Xinyin Chen ,
Doran C. French  and
Barry H. Schneider
Barry H. Schneider
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Doran C. French
Affiliation:
Illinois Wesleyan University Bloomington, Illinois, USA
Xinyin Chen
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada
Xinyin Chen
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario
Doran C. French
Affiliation:
Illinois Wesleyan University
Barry H. Schneider
Affiliation:
University of Ottawa
Get access

Summary

In this concluding chapter, we reflect on some of the challenges confronting researchers who seek to understand peer relationships within a cultural context. We focus specifically on some of the methodological issues that have been raised in the chapters and implications of these issues for future study. The chapters in this volume illustrate some of the methodological advances in the study of culture and social behavior, as well as the methodological pluralism that characterizes the field. In the following sections, we will discuss: (a) the assessment of cultural influence using between-group comparisons, (b) cultural psychology, and (c) developmental perspectives.

Equivalence and Biases in Cross-Cultural Comparisons

Many of the methodological discussions focusing on culture have addressed the difficulty of making valid inferences from comparisons of multiple cultures. A basic assumption underlying the work in the field is that the variation in the social or psychological functioning of individuals in different settings may indicate the causal influence of culture on individuals. Perhaps foremost among the issues discussed in the methodological literature in cross-cultural psychology is the need to systematically sample cultures on theoretical grounds so that the cultural groups represent variations in the theoretically relevant cultural dimension.

Although some advocates of theory-based sampling of cultures, such Van den Vijver and Leung (1997), recognize the value of two-culture comparisons when researchers have a compelling theoretical reason for comparing the two cultures, any two cultures are likely to vary on so many dimensions that it is difficult to isolate the elements that are responsible for differences between groups (Jahoda & Krewer, 1997).

Type
Chapter
Information
Peer Relationships in Cultural Context , pp. 489 - 500
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bergeron, N., & Schneider, B. H. (2005). Explaining cross-national differences in aggression: A quantitative synthesis. Aggressive Behavior, 31, 116–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bethlehem, D. W. (1975). The effect of Westernization on cooperative behavior in Central Africa. International Journal of Psychology, 10, 219–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, D. T., & Narroll, R. (1972). The mutual methodological relevance of anthropology and psychology. In Hsu, F. L. K. (Ed.), Psychological anthropology (pp. 435–468). Cambridge, England: Schenkman.Google Scholar
Chen, C., Lee, S. Y., & Stevenson, H. W. (1995). Response style and cross-cultural comparisons of rating scales among East Asian and North American students. Psychological Science, 6, 170–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X., Cen, G., Li, D., & He, Y. (2005). Social functioning and adjustment in Chinese children: The imprint of historical time. Child Development, 76, 182–195.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, X., Rubin, K., & Sun, Y. (1992). Social reputation and peer relationships in Chinese and Canadian children: A cross-cultural study. Child Development, 63, 1336–1343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Di Blas, L., Forzi, M., & Peabody, D. (2000). Evaluative and descriptive dimensions from Italian personality factors. European Journal of Personality, 14, 279–290.3.0.CO;2-X>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, C. P. (1994). Cross-cultural research on Kohlberg's stages: The basis for consensus. In Puka, B. (Ed.), New research in moral development (Vol. 5; pp. 373–384). New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Garcia-Coll, C. (2005). Editorial. Developmental Psychology, 41, 299–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gudykunst, W. B., Ting-Toomey, S., & Chua, E. (1988). Culture and interpersonal communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Jahoda, G., & Krewer, B. (1997). History of cross-cultural and cultural psychology. In Berry, J. W., Dasen, P. R., & Sawaswathi, T. S. (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 1–41). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Leung, K., & Bond, M. H. (1989). On the empirical identification of dimensions for cross-cultural comparisons. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 23, 498–509.Google Scholar
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metzger, B. M. (1976). Trials of the translator. Theology Today, 33, 96–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLoyd, V. C. (1990). The impact of economic hardship on Black families and children: Psychological distress, parenting, and socioemotional development. Child Development, 61, 311–346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 3–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peng, K., Nisbett, R. E., & Wong, N. Y. (1997). Validity problems comparing values across cultures and possible solutions. Psychological Methods, 2, 329–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Saarni, C., Mumme, D. L., & Campos, J. J. (1998). Emotional development: Action, communication, and understanding. In Damon, W. (Series Ed.) & Eisenberg, N. (Vol. Ed.). Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 237–309). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Salkind, N. J., Kojima, H., & Zelniker, T. (1978). Cognitive tempo in American, Japanese, and Israeli children. Child Development, 49, 1024–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sameroff, A. J., & Haith, M. (Eds.). (1996). The five to seven year shift: The age of reason and responsibility. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, B. H. (1998). Cross-cultural comparison as doorkeeper in research on the social and emotional adjustment of children and adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 34, 793–797.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schwartz, S. H., & Sagiv, L. (1995). Identifying culture-specifics in the content and structure of values. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 92–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shweder, R. A. (1993). The cultural psychology of the emotions. In Lewis, M. & Haviland, J. M. (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (pp. 417–434). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 580–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinha, D. (1997). Indigenizing psychology. In Berry, J. W., Dasen, P. R., & Sawaswathi, T. S. (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 129–169). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Ting-Toomey, S. (1988). A face-negotiation theory. In Kim, Y. & Gudykunst, W. (Eds.), Theory in interpersonal communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Triandis, H. C. (1989). The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts. Psychological Review, 96, 506–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Triandis, H. C. (1990). Cross-cultural studies of individualism and collectivism. In Berman, J. J., (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1989: Cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 41–133). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Turiel, E. (1998). The development of morality. In Damon, W. (Series Ed.) & Eisenberg, N. (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 3; pp. 863–932). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Valsiner, J., & Lawrence, J. A. (1997). Human development in culture across the lifespan. In Berry, J. W., Dasen, P. R., & Sawaswathi, T. S. (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 69–106). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Van de Vijver, F., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis of comparative research. In Berry, J. W., Dasen, P. R., & Sawaswathi, T. S. (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 257–300). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Veroff, J. B., & Goldenberger, N. R. (1995). What's in a name? The case for intercultural psychology. In Goldenberger, N. R. & Veroff, J. B. (Eds.), Culture and psychology (pp. 1–22). New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Weisz, J. R., Chaiyasit, W., Weiss, B., Eastman, K. L., & Jackson, E. E. (1995). A multimethod study of problem behavior among Thai and American children in school: Teacher reports versus direct observations. Child Development, 66, 402–415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whiting, J. W. (1941). Becoming a Kwoma: Teaching and learning in a New Guinea tribe. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×