Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T08:22:07.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Shape and growth differences between Neandertals and modern humans: Grounds for a species-level distinction?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 August 2009

G. E. Krovitz
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
J. L. Thompson
Affiliation:
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
G. E. Krovitz
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
A. J. Nelson
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario
Get access

Summary

Introduction

There is a great deal of interest in the phylogenetic relationship between Neandertals and anatomically modern humans, and the taxonomic classification of Neandertals is of central importance in the discussion of the origins of anatomically modern humans. There are two prominent hypotheses about modern human origins that offer contrasting views of Neandertal taxonomic status: the recent African origin model posits that Neandertals (Homo neanderthalensis) and modern humans (Homo sapiens) were separate species (e.g., Stringer, 1989, 1992; Stringer & Andrews, 1988; Stringer et al., 1984); while the multiregional model proposes genetic continuity between Neandertals (Homo sapiens neanderthalensis) and early modern humans (Homo sapiens sapiens) in Eurasia (e.g., Wolpoff, 1989; Wolpoff et al., 1984); although less extreme models have also been presented (e.g., Bräuer, 1984; Relethford & Harpending, 1994; Smith, 1992; Smith et al., 1989). Historically, morphological comparisons of Neandertals and modern humans (such as those cited above) have focused almost entirely on adult morphology. However, the study of adult remains alone has failed to answer the question of whether or not Neandertals are a subspecies of Homo sapiens, or a separate species, Homo neanderthalensis.

There is growing awareness that developmental shifts are an important component of evolutionary change (for recent examples, see papers in Minugh-Purvis & McNamara, 2002; O'Higgins & Cohn, 2000). Therefore, the identification of growth processes that differentiate Neandertal and modern human craniofacial morphology is potentially informative about whether or not Neandertals and modern humans belong to the same or to different species, and several recent studies have investigated this idea.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackermann, R. R., & Krovitz, G. E. (2002). Common patterns of facial ontogeny in the hominid lineage. Anatomical Record, 269, 142–147CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akazawa, T., Muhesen, S., Dodo, Y., Kondo, O., Mizoguchi, Y., Abe, Y., Nishiaki, Y., Ohta, S., Oguchi, T., & Haydal, J. (1995). Neanderthal infant burial from the Dederiyeh Cave in Syria. Paléorient, 21, 77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bermúdez de Castro, J. M., Arsuaga, J. L., Carbonell, E., Rosas, A., Martínez, I., & Mosquera, M. (1997). A hominid from the Lower Pleistocene of Atapurerca, Spain: Possible ancestor to Neandertals and modern humans. Science, 276, 1392–1395CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bräuer, G. (1984). A craniological approach to the origin of anatomically modern Homo sapiens in Africa and implications for the appearance of modern Europeans. In The Origins of Modern Humans: A World Survey of the Fossil Evidence, eds. F. H. Smith & F. Spencer, pp. 327–410. New York: Alan R. Liss
Bräuer, G., & Rimbach, K. W. (1990). Late archaic and modern Homo sapiens from Europe, Africa, and Southwest Asia: Craniometric comparisons and phylogenetic implications. Journal of Human Evolution, 19, 789–807CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brothwell, D. (1975). Adaptive growth rate changes as a possible explanation for the distinctiveness of the Neanderthalers. Journal of Archaeological Science, 2, 161–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collard, M., & O'Higgins, P. (2001). Ontogeny and homoplasy in the papionin monkey face. Evolution and Development, 3, 322–331CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dodo, Y., Kondo, O., Muhesen, S., & Akazawa, T. (1998). Anatomy of the Neandertal infant skeleton from Dederiyeh Cave, Syria. In Neandertals and Modern Humans in Western Asia, eds. T. Akazawa, K. Aoki, & O. Bar-Yosef, pp. 323–338. New York: Plenum Press
Duarte, C., Maurício, J., Pettitt, P. B., Souto, P., Trinkaus, E., Plicht, H., & Zilhão, J. (1999). The early Upper Paleolithic human skeleton from the Abrigo do Lagar Velho (Portugal) and modern human emergence in Iberia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 96, 7604–7609CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faerman, M., Zilberman, U., Smith, P., Kharitonov, V., & Batsevitz, V. (1994). A Neanderthal infant from the Barakai Cave, Western Caucasus. Journal of Human Evolution, 27, 405–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golovanova, L. V., Hoffecker, J. F., Kharitonov, V. M., & Romanova, G. P. (1999). Mezmaiskaya Cave: A Neanderthal occupation in the Northern Caucasus. Current Anthropology, 40, 77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez, A. M. (1992). Primitive and derived patterns of relative growth among species of Lorisidae. Journal of Human Evolution, 23, 219–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorlin, R. J., & Goldman, H. M. (1960). Oral Pathology, 5th edn. St Louis: C. V. Mosby
Green, M. D. (1990). Neandertal craniofacial growth: An ontogenetic model. MA thesis, University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Green, M. D., & Smith, F. H. (1991). Neandertal craniofacial growth. American Journal of Physical Anthropology Suppl., 12, 164Google Scholar
Howells, W. W. (1989). Skull Shapes and the Map: Craniometric Analyses in the Dispersion of Modern Homo, Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, vol. 79. Cambridge: Harvard University
Howells, W. W. (1995). Who's Who in Skulls: Ethnic Identification of Crania from Measurements, Papers of the Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, vol. 82. Cambridge: Harvard University
Ishida, H., Kondo, O., Muhesen, S., & Akazawa, T. (2000). A new Neanderthal child recovered at Dederiyeh Cave, Syria in 1997–1998. American Journal of Physical Anthropology Suppl., 30, 186–197Google Scholar
Jungers, W. L., Falsetti, A. B., & Wall, C. E. (1995). Shape, relative size, and size-adjustments in morphometrics. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 38, 137–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krings, M., Stone, A., Schmitz, R. W., Krainitzki, H., Stoneking, M., & Pääbo, S. (1997). Neandertal DNA sequences and the origin of modern humans. Cell, 90, 19–30CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krings, M., Geisert, H., Schmitz, R. W., Krainitzki, H., & Pääbo, S. (1999). DNA sequence of the mitochondrial hypervariable region II from the Neandertal type specimen. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 96, 5581–5585CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krings, M., Capelli, C., Tschentscher, F., Geisert, H., Meyer, S., Haeseler, A., Grochmidt, K., Possnert, G., Paunovic, M., & Pääbo, S. (2000). A view of Neandertal genetic diversity. Nature Genetics, 26, 144–146CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krovitz, G. E. (2000). Three-dimensional comparisons of craniofacial morphology and growth patterns in Neandertals and modern humans. PhD dissertation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore
Lahr, M. M. (1996). The Evolution of Modern Human Diversity: A Study of Cranial Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Lele, S. (1991). Some comments on coordinate-free and scale-invariant methods in morphometrics. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 85, 407–417CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lele, S. (1993). Euclidean distance matrix analysis (EDMA): Estimation of mean form and mean form difference. Mathematical Geology, 25, 573–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lele, S. (1999). Invariance and morphometrics: A critical appraisal of statistical techniques for landmark data. In On Growth and Form: Spatio-Temporal Patterning in Biology, eds. M. A. J. Chaplain, G. D. Singh, & J. McLachlan, pp. 325–336. New York: John Wiley & Sons
Lele, S., & Cole, T. M. III. (1996). A new test for shape differences when variance–covariance matrices are unequal. Journal of Human Evolution, 31, 193–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lele, S., & Richtsmeier, J. T. (1991). Euclidean distance matrix analysis: A coordinate-free approach for comparing biological shapes using landmark data. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 86, 415–427CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lele, S., & Richtsmeier, J. T. (1995). Euclidean distance matrix analysis: Confidence intervals for form and growth differences. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 98, 73–86CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lele, S. R., & McCulloch, C. E. (2002). Invariance, identifiability and morphometrics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97, 1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lele, S. R., & Richtsmeier, J. T. (2001). An Invariant Approach to Statistical Analysis of Shapes. London: Chapman & Hall
Lieberman, D. E., McBratney, B. M., & Krovitz, G. (2002). The evolution and development of cranial form in Homo sapiens. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 99, 1134–1139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Logan, W., & Kronfeld, R. (1933). Development of the human jaws and surrounding structures from birth to the age of 15 years. Journal of the American Dental Association, 20, 379–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLeod, N., & Forey, P. L. (eds.) (2002). Morphology, Shape and Phylogeny. London: Taylor & Francis
Mallegni, F., & Trinkaus, E. (1997). A reconsideration of the Archi 1 Neandertal mandible. Journal of Human Evolution, 33, 651–668CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maureille, B. (2002). A lost Neanderthal neonate found. Nature, 419, 33–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maureille, B., & Bar, D. (1999). The premaxilla in Neandertal and early modern children: Ontogeny and morphology. Journal of Human Evolution, 37, 137–152CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minugh-Purvis, N. (1988). Patterns of craniofacial growth and development in Upper Pleistocene hominids. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
Minugh-Purvis, N. (1998). The search for the earliest modern Europeans. In Neandertals and Modern Humans in Western Asia, eds. T. Akazawa, K. Aoki, & O. Bar-Yosef, pp. 339–352. New York: Plenum Press
Minugh-Purvis, N. (2002). Heterochronic change in the neurocranium and the emergence of modern humans. In Human Evolution through Developmental Change, eds. N. Minugh-Purvis & K. J. McNamara, pp. 479–498. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press
Minugh-Purvis, N., & McNamara, K. J. (eds.) (2002). Human Evolution through Developmental Change. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press
Moorrees, C. F. A., Fanning, E. A., & Hunt, E. E. (1963). Age variation of formation stages for ten permanent teeth. Journal of Dental Research, 42, 1490–1502CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O'Higgins, P., & Cohn, M. J. (eds.) (2000). Development, Growth and Evolution: Implications for the Study of the Hominid Skeleton. London: Academic Press
O'Higgins, P., & Strand Viðarsdóttir, U. (1999). New approaches to the quantitative analysis of craniofacial growth and variation. In Human Growth in the Past: Studies from Bones and Teeth, eds. R. D. Hoppa & C. M. Fitzgerald, pp. 129–160. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Ovchinnikov, I. V., Götherström, A., Romanova, G. P., Kharitonov, V. M., Lidén, K., & Goodwin, W. (2000). Molecular analysis of Neanderthal DNA from the northern Caucasus. Nature, 404, 490–493CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pap, I., Tillier, A.-M., Arensburg, B., & Chech, M. (1996). The Subalyuk Neanderthal remains (Hungary): A re-examination. Annales Historico-Naturales Musei Nationalis Hungarici, 88, 233–270Google Scholar
Ponce de León, M. S., & Zollikofer, C. P. E. (1999). New evidence from Le Moustier 1: Computer-assisted reconstruction and morphometry of the skull. Anatomical Record, 254, 474–4893.0.CO;2-3>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ponce de León, M. S., & Zollikofer, C. P. E. (2001). Neanderthal cranial ontogeny and its implications for late hominid diversity. Nature, 412, 534–538CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rak, Y., Kimbel, W. H., & Hovers, E. (1994). A Neandertal infant from Amud Cave, Israel. Journal of Human Evolution, 26, 313–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Relethford, J. H., & Harpending, H. C. (1994). Craniometric variation, genetic theory, and modern human origins. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 95, 249–270CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richtsmeier, J. T., & Lele, S. (1990). Analysis of craniofacial growth in Crouzon syndrome using landmark data. Journal of Craniofacial Genetics and Developmental Biology, 10, 39–62Google ScholarPubMed
Richtsmeier, J. T., & Lele, S. (1993). A coordinate-free approach to the analysis of growth patterns: Models and theoretical considerations. Biological Reviews, 68, 381–411CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richtsmeier, J. T., & Walker, A. (1993). A morphometric study of facial growth. In The Nariokotome Homo erectus Skeleton, eds. A. Walker & R. Leakey, pp. 391–410. Cambridge: Harvard University PressCrossRef
Richtsmeier, J. T., Cheverud, J. M., Danahey, S. E., Corner, B. D., & Lele, S. (1993a). Sexual dimorphism of ontogeny in the crab-eating macaque (Macaca fasicularis). Journal of Human Evolution, 25, 1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richtsmeier, J. T., Corner, B. D., Grausz, H. M., Cheverud, J. M., & Danahey, S. E. (1993b). The role of postnatal growth pattern in the production of facial morphology. Systematic Biology, 42, 307–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richtsmeier, J. T., Cole, T. M. III, Krovitz, G. E., Valeri, C. J., & Lele, S. (1998). Preoperative morphology and development in sagittal synostosis. Journal of Craniofacial Genetics and Developmental Biology, 18, 64–78Google ScholarPubMed
Richtsmeier, J., DeLeon, V., & Lele, S. (2002). The promise of geometric morphometrics. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 45, 63–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schillaci, M. A., & Froehlich, J. W. (2001). Nonhuman primate hybridization and the taxonomic status of Neanderthals. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 115, 157–166CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, B. H. (1991). Standards of human tooth formation and dental age assessment. In Advances in Dental Anthropology, eds. M. A. Kelley & C. S. Larsen, pp. 143–168. New York: Wiley-Liss
Smith, F. H. (1992). The role of continuity in modern humans. In Continuity or Replacement: Controversies in Homo sapiens Evolution, eds. G. Bräuer & F. H. Smith, pp. 145–156. Rotterdam: A. A. Balkema
Smith, F. H., Falsetti, A. B., & Donnelly, S. M. (1989). Modern human origins. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 32, 35–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strand Viðarsdóttir, U., O'Higgins, P., & Stringer, C. (2002). A geometric morphometric study of regional differences in the ontogeny of the modern human facial skeleton. Journal of Anatomy, 201, 211–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stringer, C. B. (1989). The origin of early modern humans: A comparison of the European and non-European evidence. In The Human Revolution: Behavioural and Biological Perspectives on the Origins of Modern Humans, ed. P. Mellars & C. Stringer, pp. 232–244. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Stringer, C. B. (1992). Replacement, continuity and the origin of Homo sapiens. In Continuity or Replacement: Controversies in Homo sapiens Evolution, eds. G. Bräuer & F. H. Smith, pp. 9–24. Rotterdam: A. A. Balkema
Stringer, C. B., & Andrews, P. (1988). Genetic and fossil evidence for the origin of modern humans. Science, 239, 1263–1268CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stringer, C. B., Hublin, J.-J., & Vandermeersch, B. (1984). The origin of anatomically modern humans in Western Europe. In The Origins of Modern Humans: A World Survey of the Fossil Evidence, eds. F. H. Smith & F. Spencer, pp. 51–135. New York: Alan R. Liss
Stringer, C. B., Dean, M. C., & Martin, R. D. (1990). A comparative study of cranial and dental development within a recent British sample and among Neandertals. In Primate Life History and Evolution, ed. C. J. de Rousseau, pp. 115–152. New York: Wiley-Liss
Thompson, J. L., & Bilsborough, A. (1997). The current state of the Le Moustier 1 skull. Acta Praehistorica et Archaeologica, 29, 17–38Google Scholar
Thompson, J. L., & Illerhaus, B. (1998). A new reconstruction of the Le Moustier 1 skull and investigation of internal structures using 3-D-uCT data. Journal of Human Evolution, 35, 647–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tillier, A.-m. (1983). L'Enfant néanderthalien du Roc de Marsal (Campagne du Bugue, Dordogne): Le squelette facial. Annales de Paléontologie, 69, 137–149Google Scholar
Turbón, D., Pérez-Pérez, A., & Stringer, C. B. (1997). A multivariate analysis of Pleistocene hominids: Testing hypotheses of European origins. Journal of Human Evolution, 32, 449–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vark, G. N., Bilsborough, A., & Henke, W. (1992). Affinities of European Upper Palaeolithic Homo sapiens and later human evolution. Journal of Human Evolution, 23, 401–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, F. L., Godfrey, L. R., & Sutherland, M. R. (2002). Heterochrony and the evolution of Neandertal and modern human craniofacial form. In Human Evolution through Developmental Change, eds. N. Minugh-Purvis & K. J. McNamara, pp. 405–441. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press
Wolpoff, M. H. (1989). Multiregional evolution: The fossil alternative to Eden. In The Human Revolution, eds. P. Mellars & C. B. Stringer, pp. 62–108. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press
Wolpoff, M. H., Wu, X., & Thorne, A. G. (1984). Modern Homo sapiens origins: A general theory of hominid evolution involving the fossil evidence from East Asia. In The Origins of Modern Humans, eds. F. H. Smith & F. Spencer, pp. 411–483. New York: Alan R. Liss
Zollikofer, C. P. E., Ponce de León, M. S., Martin, R. D., & Stucki, P. (1995). Neanderthal computer skulls. Nature, 375, 283–285CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×