A new approach to the quantitative analysis of postcranial growth in Neandertals and modern humans: Evidence from the hipbone

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511542565.015

15 - A new approach to the quantitative analysis of postcranial growth in Neandertals and modern humans: Evidence from the hipbone

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 August 2009

T. Majó and

Edited by

G. E. Krovitz and

T. Majó: Affiliation:
Université Bordeaux 1
A-M. Tillier: Affiliation:
Université Bordeaux 1
J. L. Thompson: Affiliation:
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
G. E. Krovitz: Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
A. J. Nelson: Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

Growth and development studies in Paleolithic populations have, for a long time, focused on craniodental remains as there was simply less documentation available for similar studies of the postcranial skeleton. Yet the appendicular skeleton and the hipbone are thought to provide an indication of differences in robusticity and morphology between human groups within the Late Pleistocene hominid sample (e.g., Churchill, 1994; Trinkaus, 1992; Trinkaus et al., 1998). The morphology of the hipbone (note: we follow the Nomina Anatomica for the use of appropriate nomenclature, in agreement with Tuttle's note published in 1988) has been used to distinguish Neandertals from their close relatives, anatomically modern humans (e.g., McCown & Keith, 1939; Rak, 1990; Rosenberg, 1988; Stewart, 1960; Trinkaus, 1976). However, none of the Neandertal specimens in Europe is sufficiently preserved to estimate relative sizes of the iliac, ischial, and pubic elements in order to produce accurate analysis of the hipbone morphocomplex. By far the most complete and least distorted specimen within the Middle Paleolithic hominid sample is represented by Kebara 2 from the southern Levant. While the identification of several Near Eastern specimens as parts of the Neandertal sample is still debated (e.g., Arensburg, 1989; Arensburg & Belfer-Cohen, 1998; Mann, 1995; Trinkaus, 1992), the Kebara specimen is usually described as a presumed Neandertal (see Aiello & Dean, 1990: 455).

On the basis of the European fossil record, the Neandertal adult hipbone is primarily described as exhibiting an unusually elongated and slender superior pubic ramus.

Type: Chapter
Information: Patterns of Growth and Development in the Genus Homo , pp. 361 - 385

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511542565.015 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aiello, L., & Dean, C. (1990). An Introduction to Human Evolutionary Anatomy. London: Academic Press

Akazawa, T., Muhesen, S., Dodo, Y., Kondo, O., & Mizoguchi, Y. (1995). Neanderthal infant burial from the Dederiyeh Cave in Syria. Paléorient, 21(2), 77–86CrossRef Google Scholar

Akazawa, T., Muhesen, S., Ishida, H., Kondo, O., & Griggo, C. (1999). New discovery of a Neanderthal burial from the Dederiyeh cave in Syria. Paléorient, 25(2), 129–142CrossRef Google Scholar

Anonymous (1985). Cem Anos de Antropologia em Coimbra. Coimbra: Museu e Laboratorio Antropologico

Arensburg, B. (1989). New skeletal evidence concerning the anatomy of Middle Paleolithic populations in the Middle East: The Kebara skeleton. In The Human Revolution: Behavioral and Biological Perspectives in the Origins of Modern Humans, eds. P. Mellars & C. B. Stringer, pp. 165–171. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press

Arensburg, B., & Belfer-Cohen, A. (1998). Sapiens and Neandertals: Rethinking the Levantine Middle Paleolithic hominids. In Neandertals and Modern Humans in Western Asia, eds. T. Akazawa, K. Aoki, & O. Bar Yosef, pp. 311–322. New York: Plenum Press

Bräuer, G. (1988). Osteometrie. In Anthropologie: Handbuch der vergleichenden Biologie des Menschen, Zugleich 4, Auflage des Lehrbuchs des Anthropologie begründet von martin R., Band I, Wesen und Methoden der Anthropologie, ed. R. Knussman, pp. 160–232. New York: Gustav Fischer

Bruzek, J., &Vandermeersch, B. (1997). Reassessment of the sex of the Qafzeh 9 individual based on multivariate statistical analysis. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, Suppl. 24, 84Google Scholar

Churchill, S. E. (1994). Human upper body evolution in the Eurasian Later Pleistocene. PhD dissertation, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque

Dodo, Y., Kondo, O., Muhesen, S., & Akazawa, T. (1998). Anatomy of the Neandertal infant skeleton from Dederiyeh Cave, Syria. In Neandertals and Modern Humans in Western Asia, eds. T. Akazawa, K. Aoki, & O. Bar Yosef, pp. 323–338. New York: Plenum Press

Duarte, C.,Mauricio, J.,Pettitt, P. B.,Souto, P.,Trinkaus, E.,Plicht, H., & Zilhao, J. (1999). The Early Upper Paleolithic human skeleton from the Abrigo do Lagar Velho (Portugal) and modern human emergence in Iberia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 96, 7604–7609CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Duday, H., Laubenheimer, F., & Tillier, A-m. (1995). Sallèles-d'Aude: Nouveau-nés et Nourrissons Gallo-romains, Annales Littéraires de l'Université de Besançon no. 563; Centre de Recherches d'Histoire Ancienne no. 144, série Amphores no. 3. Paris: Les Belles Lettres

Duport, L. (1958). Le Gisement moustérien de Puymoyen (Charente), Grotte René Simard. Bulletins et Mémoires de la Société Archéologique de la Charente, 35–39Google Scholar

Fazekas, I. G., & Kósa F. (1978). Forensic Fetal Osteology. Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadô

Golanova, L., Hoffecker, J. F., Kharitonov, V., & Romanova, G. (1999). Mezmaiskaya Cave: A Neanderthal occupation in the Northern Caucasus. Current Anthropology, 40, 77–86CrossRef Google Scholar

Heim, J-L. (1982). Les Enfants Néandertaliens de La Ferrassie, Fondation Singer Polignac. Paris: Masson

Herrmann, B. (1977). Über die Reste des postcranialen Skelettes des Neanderthalers von Le Moustier. Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Anthropologie, 68, 129–149Google Scholar

Hoppa, R. D. (1992). Evaluating human skeletal growth: An Anglo-Saxon example. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 2, 275–288CrossRef Google Scholar

Humphrey, L. (1998). Growth patterns in the modern human skeleton. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 105, 57–723.0.CO;2-A>CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Madre-Dupouy, M. (1992). L'Enfant Néandertalien du Roc de Marsal: Etude Analytique et Comparative, Cahiers de Paléoanthropologie. Paris: Editions du CNRS

Majó, T. (1995). Quelques aspects de la croissance de l'os coxal: Application aux Néandertaliens de la Ferrassie. Anthropologie et Préhistoire, 106, 57–64Google Scholar

Majó, T. (2000). L'Os coxal non-adulte: Approche méthodologique de la croissance et de la diagnose sexuelle. Application aux enfants du Paléolithique moyen. Thèse en Sciences Biologiques et Médicales, Université Bordeaux 1, Bordeaux

Mann, A. E. (1995). Modern human origins: Evidence from the Near East. Paléorient, 21(2), 35–46CrossRef Google Scholar

McCown, T. D., & Keith, A. (1939). The Stone Age of Mount Carmel, vol. 2. Oxford: Clarendon Press

Merchant, V. L., & Ubelaker, D. H. (1977). Skeletal growth of the protohistoric Arikara. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 46, 61–72CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Molleson, T. I., Cox, M., Waldron, A. H., & Whitaker, D. K. (1993). The Spitalfields Project, vol. 2, Anthropology CBA Research Report no. 86. York: Council for British Archaeology

Nelson, A. J., & Thompson, J. L. (1999). Growth and development in Neandertals and other fossil hominids: Implications for the evolution of hominid ontogeny. In Human Growth in the Past: Studies from Bones and Teeth, eds. R. H. Hoppa & C. M. Fitzgerald, pp. 88–110. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Radovčić, J., Smith, F., Trinkaus, E., & Wolpoff, M. H. (1988). The Krapina Hominids: An Illustrated Catalog of Skeletal Collection. Zagreb: Mladost

Rak, Y. (1990). On the differences between two pelvises of Mousterian context from Qafzeh and Kebara Caves, Israel. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 81, 323–332CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Rosenberg, K. R. (1988). The functional significance of the Neandertal pubic length. Current Anthropology, 29, 595–617CrossRef Google Scholar

Saunders, S. R. (1992). Subadult skeletons and growth related studies. In Skeletal Biology of Past Peoples: Research Methods, eds. S. R. Saunders & M. A. Katzenberg, pp. 1–20. New York: Wiley-Liss

Saunders, S. R., & Hoppa, R. D. (1993). Growth deficit in survivors and non-survivors: Biological mortality bias in subadult skeletal samples. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 36, 127–151CrossRef Google Scholar

Schwarcz, H. P., Grün, R., Vandermeersch, B., Bar Yosef, O., Valladas, H., & Tchernov, E. (1988). ESR dates for the hominid burial site of Qafzeh in Israel. Journal of Human Evolution, 17, 733–737CrossRef Google Scholar

Smith, F. H. (1976). The Neandertal Remains from Krapina: A Descriptive and Comparative Study, Department of Anthropology Report of Investigations, no. 15. Knoxville: University of Tennessee

Stewart, T. D. (1960). Form of the pubic bone in Neanderthal man. Science, 131, 1437–1438CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Sundick, R. I. (1978). Human skeletal growth and age determination. Homo, 29(4), 228–249Google Scholar

Suzuki, H., & Takai, F. (eds.) (1970). The Amud Man and His Cave Site. Tokyo: University of Tokyo

Tillier, A-m. (1986). Quelques aspects de l'ontogenèse du squelette cranien des Néanderthaliens. In Fossil Man: New Facts, New Ideas, eds. V. V. Novotny & A. Mizerova, Anthropos (Brno),23, 207–216

Tillier, A-m. (1995). Neanderthal ontogeny: A new source for critical analysis. Anthropologie (Brno), 33(1/2), 63–68Google Scholar

Tillier, A-m. (1999). Les Enfants Moustériens de Qafzeh: Interprétation Phylogén-étique et Paléoauxologique, Cahiers de Paléoanthropologie. Paris: Editions du CNRS

Tillier, A-m. (2000). Palaeoauxology applied to Neanderthals: Similarities and contrasts between Neanderthal and modern children. In Children in the Past: Paleoauxology, Demographic Anomalies, Taphonomy and Mortuary Practices, ed. A-m. Tillier, Anthropologie (Brno), 8(1), 109–120

Tixier, J., Brugal, J-Ph., Tillier, A-m., Bruzek, J., & Hublin, J-J. (2001). Irhoud 5, un fragment d'os coxal non-adulte des niveaux moustériens marocains. Actes des 1e Journées Nationales de l'Archéologie et du patrimoine au Maroc, 1–4 July 1998, vol. 1, Préhistoire, pp. 149–53. Rabat: Société Marocaine d'Archéologie et du Patrimoine

Tompkins, R. L., & Trinkaus, E., (1987). La Ferrassie 6 and the development of Neandertal pubic morphology. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 73, 223–239CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Trinkaus, E. (1976). The morphology of European and Southwest Asian Neandertal pubic bones. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 44, 95–104CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Trinkaus, E. (1992). Morphological contrasts between the Near Eastern Qafzeh-Skhul and Late Archaic human samples: Grounds for a behavioral difference? In The Evolution and Dispersal of Modern Humans in Asia, eds. T. Akazawa, K. Aoki, & T. Kimura, pp. 277–294. Tokyo: Hokusen-sha

Trinkaus, E., Ruff, C. B., & Churchill, S. E. (1998). Upper limb versus lower limb loading patterns among Near Eastern Middle Paleolithic Hominids. In Neandertals and Modern Humans in Western Asia, eds. T. Akazawa, K. Aoki & O. Bar Yosef, pp. 391–404. New York: Plenum Press

Tuttle, R. H. (1988). The hipbone and Nomina Anatomica. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 77, 133–134CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Valladas, H., Reyss, J. L., Joron, J. L., Valladas, G., Bar Yosef, O., & Vandermeersch, B. (1988). Thermoluminescence dating of Mousterian “Proto-Cro-Magnon” remains from Israel and the origin of modern man. Nature, 331, 614–616CrossRef Google Scholar

Vandermeersch, B. (1981). Les Hommes Fossiles de Qafzeh (Israël), Cahiers de Paléoanthropologie. Paris: Editions du CNRS

Vlček, E. (1973). Postcranial skeleton of a Neandertal child from Kiik Koba, USSR. Journal of Human Evolution, 2, 537–546CrossRef Google Scholar

Book contents

15 - A new approach to the quantitative analysis of postcranial growth in Neandertals and modern humans: Evidence from the hipbone

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive