Book contents
- Patent Cultures
- Cambridge Intellectual Property and Information Law
- Patent Cultures
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Note on the Cover Image
- Part I Introductory
- Part II Americas
- Part III Southern Europe
- Part IV Central and Eastern Europe
- Part V Asia
- 13 Patent Policy in India under the British Raj
- 14 The India Twist to Patent Culture
- 15 The Life and Times of Patent No. 2,670
- Part VI Epilogue
- Index
- Cambridge Intellectual Property and Information Law
14 - The India Twist to Patent Culture
Investigating Its History
from Part V - Asia
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 March 2020
- Patent Cultures
- Cambridge Intellectual Property and Information Law
- Patent Cultures
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Note on the Cover Image
- Part I Introductory
- Part II Americas
- Part III Southern Europe
- Part IV Central and Eastern Europe
- Part V Asia
- 13 Patent Policy in India under the British Raj
- 14 The India Twist to Patent Culture
- 15 The Life and Times of Patent No. 2,670
- Part VI Epilogue
- Index
- Cambridge Intellectual Property and Information Law
Summary
The use of patents in relation to public health is especially important in relation to the needs of developing countries to ensure equitable access to “life-saving” patented drugs. Since the USA has been pursuing a stringent protection regime for drugs marketed by US patentees, however, it becomes all the more essential to highlight such concerns among developing countries. Recently Brazil, China, and India have individually been at the forefront of challenges to US patent policy; other countries such as Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Singapore are bound together in such campaigns by colonial after-effects of the British Empire. This chapter considers implications of the pricing of patented drugs for AIDS/HIV and cancer patients in developing countries, specifically India and argues that these should be considered in a distinct category of “positive discrimination.” Looking at the role of the relevant stakeholders – governments, civil society, and pharmaceutical companies – it explores how India and Brazil have seamlessly taken the lead in determining the optimum use of compulsory licensing measures to ensure that patented drugs are available to all.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Patent CulturesDiversity and Harmonization in Historical Perspective, pp. 302 - 318Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020